Causes of short-term mortality after appendectomy: a population-based case-controlled study

PAN-Immune inflammation value: a new biomarker for diagnosing appendicitis in children??

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the potential of the pan-immune-inflammation values (PIV) index as a biomarker for diagnosing acute appendicitis in children and compares its performance with other systemic inflammatory markers.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1,514 pediatric patients aged 0-18 years with abdominal pain admitted between 2019 and 2023 was conducted. Patients were categorized into complicated, non-complicated appendicitis, negative appendectomy, and non-surgical treatment groups. Demographic and laboratory data were recorded, and PIV, Systemic Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) indices were calculated. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess predictive performance, with optimal cut-offs evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, and multiple logistic regression (MLR) analyses.

RESULTS

Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC), C-reactive Protein (CRP), lymphocyte, and PLR showed weak predictive value, while White Blood Cell Count (WBC), neutrophil, monocyte, NLR, SII, SIRI, and PIV demonstrated poor predictive value for appendicitis. Optimal cut-offs were 3.40 for NLR, 134.5 for PLR, 1010.3 for SII, 3.47 for SIRI, and 919.3 for PIV, with sensitivity and specificity values of 78.7%, 47.1% for NLR; 64.7%, 47.5% for PLR; 75.6%, 52% for SII; 71.5%, 57.3% for SIRI; and 72.2%, 54.1% for PIV. In the MLR model, PIV above 919.3 increased appendicitis likelihood 2.67-fold (95% Confidence Interval: 2.16-3.37).

CONCLUSION

Although PIV demonstrated potential as a novel biomarker for pediatric appendicitis, its diagnostic utility remains limited without supplementary clinical and radiological data. Larger prospective studies are recommended to validate these findings and improve clinical decision-making. PIV may serve as a supplementary tool in diagnosing pediatric appendicitis when used alongside other markers and diagnostic methods.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

'retrospectively registered'.

Swedish national guidelines for diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Differences in the management of this large group of patients has important consequences for the patients and the healthcare system. Controversies regarding the understanding of the natural course of the disease, the utility of new diagnostic methods, and alternative treatments have lead to large variations in practice patterns between centres. These national guidelines present evidence-based recommendations aiming at a uniform, safe and cost-efficient management of this large group of patients.

METHOD

A working group of six experts with broad clinical and research experience was formed. Additional expertise from outside was consulted during the process. A national survey revealed significant variations in the management of patients with suspicion of appendicitis. The evidence provided in published guidelines and reviews were extracted and systematically graded, according to the GRADE methodology. This was supplemented by additional more recent and more directed search of the literature. Patients treated for appendicitis were involved through interviews. The guidelines were reviewed by external experts before the final version was determined.

RESULTS

The guidelines cover an extensive number of issues: pathology, epidemiology, aetiology, natural history, clinical and laboratory diagnosis, diagnostic scoring systems, diagnostic imaging, treatment, nursing care, follow-up, quality registers and quality indicators, among others. Special considerations related to children and pregnant women are covered.

CONCLUSION

These national guidelines present an extensive and thorough review of the current knowledge base related to appendicitis, and provide up-to-date evidence-based recommendations for the management of this large group of patients.

Patients' attitudes toward negative appendectomies and surgery for suspected appendicitis: a qualitative interview study

INTRODUCTION

From a surgeon's perspective, appendicitis is treated with appendectomy and sometimes a normal appendix is removed. This study aimed to investigate the patients' perspectives on having surgery but not appendicitis and their involvement in treatment decisions.

METHODS

This study is reported according to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guideline. Eligible participants either had a normal diagnostic laparoscopy with no resection of the appendix or a negative appendectomy confirmed by histopathology. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

This study consisted of 15 interviews. Analysis of the interviews resulted in the formulation of four categories: (1) discovering the results of the histopathology report, (2) thoughts on having a normal appendix removed or left in situ, (3) the scarce use of shared decision-making, and (4) general anesthesia and the risk of a burst appendix made the participants nervous.

CONCLUSION

The amount of information communicated to the patients before and after surgery was sparse. The participants were not aware of the histopathology results and the participants were not involved in decision-making and were generally anxious about anesthesia and a burst appendix.

Observation Safely Reduces the Use of the Computerized Tomography in Medium-to-Low-Risk Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives-The objective was to compare the effectiveness of observation in standard-of-care computed tomography (CT) in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis (AA). Methods-Patients with clinically suspected AA and inconclusive diagnosis after primary clinical examination, laboratory examination, and transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) were eligible for the study, and they were randomized (1:1) to parallel groups: observation-group patients were observed for 8-12 h and then, repeated clinical and laboratory examinations and TUS were performed; CT group (control group) patients underwent abdominopelvic CT scan. The study utilized Statistical Analysis System 9.2 for data analysis, including tests, logistic regression, ROC analysis, and significance evaluation. Patients were enrolled in the study at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos in Lithuania between December 2018 and June 2021. Results-A total of 160 patients (59 men, 101 women), with a mean age of 33.7 ± 14.71, were included, with 80 patients in each group. Observation resulted in a reduced likelihood of a CT scan compared with the CT group (36.3% vs. 100% p < 0.05). One diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in the observation group; there were no cases of negative appendectomy (NA) in the CT group. Both conditional CT and observation pathways resulted in high sensitivity and specificity (97.7% and 94.6% vs. 96.7% and 95.8%). Conclusions-Observation including the repeated evaluation of laboratory results and TUS significantly reduces the number of CT scans without increasing NA numbers or the number of complicated cases.

Acute appendicitis: A block-randomized study on active observation with or without antibiotic treatment

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic treatment of unselected patients with acute appendicitis is safe and effective. However, it is unknown to what extent early provision of antibiotic treatment may represent overtreatment due to spontaneous healing of appendix inflammation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of antibiotic treatment versus active in-hospital observation on spontaneous regression of acute appendicitis.

METHOD

Patients who sought acute medical care at Sahlgrenska University Hospital were block-randomized according to age (18-60 years) and systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein <60 mg/L, white blood cell <13,000/μL), in combination with clinical and abdominal characteristics of acute appendicitis. Study patients received antibiotic treatment and active observation, while control patients were allocated to classic active "wait and see observation" for either disease regression or the need for surgical exploration. According to our standard surgical care, certified surgeons in charge decided whether and when appendectomy was necessary. In total, 1,019 patients were screened for eligibility; 203 patients met inclusion criteria, 126 were accepted to participate, 29 declined, and 48 were missed for inclusion.

RESULTS

The antibiotic group (n = 69) and the control group (n = 57) were comparable at inclusion. Appendectomy at first hospital stay was 28% and 53% for study and control patients (χ2, P < .004). Life table analysis indicated a time-dependent difference in the need for appendectomy during follow-up (P < .03). Antibiotics prevented surgical exploration and appendectomy by 72% to 50% compared to 47% to 37% in the control group across the time course follow-ups between 5 and 1,200 days.

CONCLUSION

Early antibiotic treatment is superior to traditional "wait and see observation" to avoid surgical exploration and appendectomy.

Acute Appendicitis Treatment Strategies and Mortality Based on Critical Illness on Admission: An Observational Study

Background: Trials have shown non-inferiority of non-operative management (NOM) for appendicitis, although critically ill patients have been often excluded. The purpose of this study is to evaluate surgical versus NOM outcomes in critically ill patients with appendicitis by measuring mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS). Patients and Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) Database was utilized to analyze data from 10 states between 2008 and 2015. All patients with acute appendicitis by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes over the age of 18 were included. Negative binomial and logistic regression were used to determine the association of acute renal failure (ARF), cardiovascular failure (CVF), pulmonary failure (PF), and sepsis by treatment strategy (laparoscopic, open, both, or no surgery) on mortality and hospital LOS. Results: Among 464,123 patients, 67.5%, 23.3%, 8.2%, and 0.8% underwent laparoscopic, open, NOM, or both laparoscopic and open surgery, respectively. Patients who underwent surgery had 58% lower odds of mortality and 34% shorter hospital LOS compared with NOM patients. Patients with ARF, CVF, PF, and sepsis had 102%, 383%, 475%, and 666% higher odds of mortality and a 47%, 46%, 71%, and 163% longer hospital LOS, respectively, compared with patients without these diagnoses on admission. Conclusions: Critical illness on admission increases mortality and hospital LOS. Patients who underwent laparoscopic, and to a lesser extent, open appendectomy had improved mortality compared with those who did not undergo surgery regardless of critical illness status.

Outcomes after emergency appendicectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: a population-based cohort study from England

INTRODUCTION

The mortality risk after appendicectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis is predicted to be higher than in the general population given the associated risk of perioperative bleeding, infections and liver decompensation. This population-based cohort study aimed to determine the 90-day mortality risk following emergency appendicectomy in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy in England between January 2001 and December 2018 were identified from two linked primary and secondary electronic healthcare databases, the clinical practice research datalink and hospital episode statistics data. Length of stay, re-admission, case fatality and the odds ratio of 90-day mortality were calculated for patients with and without cirrhosis, adjusting for age, sex and co-morbidity using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 40,353 patients underwent appendicectomy and of these 75 (0.19%) had cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis were more likely to be older (p < 0.0001) and have comorbidities (p < 0.0001). Proportionally, more patients with cirrhosis underwent an open appendicectomy (76%) compared with 64% of those without cirrhosis (p = 0.03). The 90-day case fatality rate was 6.67% in patients with cirrhosis compared with 0.56% in patients without cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis had longer hospital length of stay (4 (IQR 3-9) days versus 3 (IQR 2-4) days and higher readmission rates at 90 days (20% vs 11%, p = 0.019). Most importantly, their odds of death at 90 days were 3 times higher than patients without cirrhosis, adjusted odds ratio 3.75 (95% CI 1.35-10.49).

CONCLUSION

Patients with cirrhosis have a threefold increased odds of 90-day mortality after emergency appendicectomy compared to those without cirrhosis.

Common procedures and conditions leading to inpatient hospital admissions in adults with and without diabetes from 2015 to 2019 in Germany : A comparison of frequency, length of hospital stay and complications

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate common surgical procedures and admission causes in inpatient cases with diabetes in Germany between 2015 and 2019 and compare them to inpatient cases without diabetes.

METHODS

Based on the German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) statistics, regression models stratified by age groups and gender were used to calculate hospital admissions/100,000 individuals, hospital days as well as the proportion of complications and mortality in inpatient cases ≥ 40 years with or without a documented diagnosis of diabetes (type 1 or type 2).

RESULTS

A total of 14,222,326 (21%) of all inpatient cases aged ≥ 40 years had a diagnosis of diabetes. More middle-aged females with vs. without diabetes/100,000 individuals [95% CI] were observed, most pronounced in cases aged 40-< 50 years with myocardial infarction (305 [293-319] vs. 36 [36-37], p < 0.001). Higher proportions of complications and longer hospital stays were found for all procedures and morbidities in cases with diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Earlier hospitalizations, longer hospital stays and more complications in inpatient cases with diabetes together with the predicted future increase in diabetes prevalence depict huge challenges for the German healthcare system. There is an urgent need for developing strategies to adequately care for patients with diabetes in hospital.

Estimating the potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment of acute appendicitis in Thailand using a secondary data analysis of service utilization before, during and after the COVID-19 lockdown policy

Introduction

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies; however, optimal diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis remains challenging. We used the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown policy as a natural experiment to explore potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment of acute appendicitis in Thailand. The aim of this study was to estimate the potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment of acute appendicitis in Thailand by examining service utilization before, during, and after the COVID-19 lockdown policy.

Methods

A secondary data analysis of patients admitted with acute appendicitis under the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) in Thailand over a 6-year period between 2016 and 2021 was conducted. The trend of acute appendicitis was plotted using a 14-day rolling average of daily cases. Patient characteristics, clinical management, and outcomes were descriptively presented and compared among three study periods, namely pre-pandemic, lockdown, and post-lockdown.

Results

The number of overall acute appendicitis cases decreased from 25,407 during pre-pandemic to 22,006 during lockdown (13.4% reduction) and 21,245 during post-lockdown (16.4% reduction). This reduction was mostly due to a lower incidence of uncomplicated acute appendicitis, whereas cases of generalized peritonitis were scarcely affected by the pandemic. There was an increasing trend towards the usage of diagnostic computerized tomography for acute appendicitis but no significant difference in treatment modalities and complication rates.

Conclusion

The stable rates of generalized peritonitis and complications during the COVID-19 lockdown, despite fewer admissions overall, suggest that there may have been overdiagnosis and overtreatment of acute appendicitis in Thailand. Policy makers could use these findings to improve clinical practice for acute appendicitis in Thailand and support the efficient utilization of surgical services in the future, especially during pandemics.

Emergency appendectomy versus elective appendectomy following conservative treatment for acute appendicitis: a multicenter retrospective clinical study by the Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine

PURPOSE

To establish the best treatment strategy for acute appendicitis.

METHODS

We collected data on 2142 appendectomies performed in 2017 and compared the backgrounds and surgical outcomes of patients who underwent early surgery (ES) (< 48 h) with those managed with non-ES (> 48 h). We performed a risk factor analysis to predict postoperative complications and subgroup analysis to propose a standard treatment strategy.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly higher in the ES group than in the non-ES group, and significantly lower in the laparoscopic surgery group than in the laparotomy group. Surgical outcomes, including the incidence of postoperative complications, were comparable after acute surgery (< 12 h) and subacute surgery (12-48 h), following antibiotic treatment. The risk factors for postoperative complications in the ES group were a higher age, history of abdominal surgery, perforation, high C-reactive protein level, histological evidence of gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, a long operation time, and intraoperative complications. The risk factors for postoperative complications in the non-ES group were perforation and unsuccessful conservative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-early appendectomy is feasible for acute appendicitis but should be applied with care in patients with risk factors for postoperative complications or failure of pretreatment, including diabetes mellitus, abscess formation, and perforation.

[Mortality in acute appendicitis in Russia]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the causes of mortality in patients with acute appendicitis in Russia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied mortality in patients with acute appendicitis in the Russian Federation in 2020. We surveyed the hospitals with mortality reported in the electronic database of annual reports to the chief surgeon of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.

RESULTS

There were 259 deaths among 150.393 patients with acute appendicitis aged ≥18 years (in-hospital mortality 0.17%). We obtained data about 95.8% (n=248) of lethal cases including 86.3% (n=214) complicated and 13.7% (n=34) uncomplicated forms of disease. Two patients died without surgery (0.8%). Among the deceased, 58.2% (n=145) were men and 41.8% (n=103) were women. Mean patient age was 66.2 years [0.95% CI 64.2-68.1]. The main cause of death in complicated appendicitis was late presentation (after 4.9 days [0.95% CI 4.3-5.4]) that resulted peritonitis and sepsis in 71.5% (n=153) of patients. Cardiovascular diseases were noted in 23.4% (n=50) of cases. A new coronavirus infection was detected in 7.0% (n=15) of patients. However, COVID-19 as a direct cause of death was recognized in 2.8% (n=6) of cases. Other reasons accounted for 2.3% (n=5). In uncomplicated appendicitis, cardiovascular diseases were the main cause of mortality (73.5%, n=25). Peritonitis and sepsis were found in 11.8% (n=4) of cases, COVID-19 - in 5.9% (n=2). Other causes accounted for 8.8% (n=3). Diagnostic, tactical, technical problems and their combination were revealed in 54.4% of lethal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Mortality from acute appendicitis in the Russian Federation is low, comparable with international data, and mainly associated with delayed treatment and complicated course of disease. However, the impact of diagnostic, tactical and technical errors on the outcome of acute appendicitis is significant.

Metabolomics and Inflammatory Mediator Profiling for the Differentiation of Life-Threatening and Non-Severe Appendicitis in the Pediatric Population

While children with appendicitis often have excellent clinical outcomes, some develop life-threatening complications including sepsis and organ dysfunction requiring pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) support. Our study applied a metabolomics and inflammatory protein mediator (IPM) profiling approach to determine the bio-profiles of children who developed severe appendicitis compared with those that did not. We performed a prospective case-control study of children aged 0-17 years with a diagnosis of appendicitis. Cases had severe disease resulting in PICU admission. Primary controls had moderate appendicitis (perforation without PICU); secondary controls had mild appendicitis (non-perforated). Serum samples were analyzed using Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (¹H NMR) Spectroscopy and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS); IPM analysis was performed using plasma bead-based multiplex profiling. Comparisons were made using multivariate data statistical analysis. Fifty-three children were included (15 severe, 38 non-severe). Separation between severe and moderate appendicitis demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity (100%, 88%; 14 compounds), separation between severe and mild appendicitis also showed excellent sensitivity and specificity (91%, 90%; 16 compounds). Biomarker patterns derived from metabolomics and IPM profiling are capable of distinguishing children with severe appendicitis from those with less severe disease. These findings provide an important first step towards developing non-invasive diagnostic tools for clinicians in early identification of children who are at a high risk of developing severe appendicitis.

Novel molecular biomarkers and diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children

Reliable and efficient diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis is essential for the establishment of a clinical management plan and improvement of patient outcomes. Current strategies used to diagnose a child presenting with a suspected appendicitis include laboratory studies, clinical scores and diagnostic imaging. Although these modalities work in conjunction with each other, one optimal diagnostic strategy has yet to be agreed upon. The recent introduction of precision medicine techniques such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics has increased both the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of appendicitis. Using these novel strategies, the integration of precision medicine into clinical practice via point-of-care technologies is a plausible future. These technologies would assist in the screening, diagnosis and prognosis of pediatric appendicitis.

Conditional CT Strategy-An Effective Tool to Reduce Negative Appendectomy Rate and the Overuse of the CT

(1) Background: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) remains challenging; either computed tomography (CT) is universally used or negative appendectomy rates of up to 30% are reported. Transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) as the first-choice imaging modality might be useful in adult patients to reduce the need for CT scans while maintaining low negative appendectomy (NA) rates. The aim of this study was to report the results of the conditional CT strategy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. (2) Methods: All patients suspected of acute appendicitis were prospectively registered from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. Data on their clinical, radiological and surgical outcomes are presented. (3) Results: A total of 1855 patients were enrolled in our study: 1206 (65.0%) were women, 649 (35.0%) were men, and the median age was 34 years (IQR, 24.5-51). TUS was performed in 1851 (99.8%) patients, and CT in 463 (25.0%) patients. Appendices were not visualized on TUS in 1320 patients (71.3%). Furthermore, 172 (37.1%) of 463 CTs were diagnosed with AA, 42 (9.1%) CTs revealed alternative emergency diagnosis and 249 (53.8%) CTs were normal. Overall, 519 (28.0%) patients were diagnosed with AA: 464 appendectomies and 27 diagnostic laparoscopies were performed. The NA rate was 4.2%. The sensitivity and specificity for TUS and CT are as follows: 71.4% and 96.2%; 93.8% and 93.6%. (4) Conclusion: A conditional CT strategy is effective in reducing NA rates and avoids unnecessary CT in a large proportion of patients. Observation and repeated TUS might be useful in unclear cases.

Prevalence of Postoperative Unfavorable Outcome and Associated Factors in Patients with Appendicitis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

Appendicitis is surgical emergency that might need removal of the inflamed appendix. Unless treated, appendicular abscess, perforation, and even death might be the unfavorable outcomes. Hence, this study was aimed to investigate the unfavorable outcomes and associated factors among appendicitis operated patients.

Patients and Methods

A total of 300 patients who operated for appendicitis from September 1 2019 to August 30 2020 were studied using a retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were collected by using a checklist. Epi-data and SPSS version 25 were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. Binary logistic regression model was used to identify independent factors. A p<0.05 was used to set the statistical significance of factors.

Results

Among 300 patients who were operated for acute appendicitis, 36 (12%) developed unfavorable outcomes. Though one death because of sepsis was recorded, wound infection was the main postoperative disorder. Female (AOR=0.49; 95% CI: 0.13-0.074), living outside the hospital setting (AOR= 0.49; 95% CI: 0.13-0.074), duration of illness before arrival at the hospital (1-3 days (AOR= 1.67; 95% CI: 1.34-8.37) and ≥4 days (AOR=5.38; 95% CI: 1.63-7.69)), more than 3 days hospital stay (AOR= 3.21; 95% CI: 2.06-8.10), and mass in the right lower quadrant (AOR= 6.01; 95% CI: 2.11-14.50) were the independent predictors of unfavorable outcomes of appendicitis treatment.

Conclusion

In this study, unfavorable outcome of acute appendicitis was high. More than one-tenth of appendicitis cases developed unfavorable outcomes. Living outside the hospital setting area, long duration of illness before arrival at the Hospital, more than 3 days hospital stay, and mass in the right lower quadrant were the risk factors, while females were less likely to have unfavorable outcomes of appendicitis. Therefore, closely working with patients who have abdominal pain and increasing their awareness about acute appendicitis will improve the operation outcome.

The Worldwide Epidemiology of Acute Appendicitis: An Analysis of the Global Health Data Exchange Dataset

BACKGROUND

This study aims to describe the worldwide epidemiology and changing disease trends of acute appendicitis (AA).

METHODS

Epidemiological data on the incidence of AA and deaths were collected from the Global Health Data Exchange repository from 1990 to 2019. Data were stratified by age, sex and Socio-Demographic Index (SDI).

RESULTS

In 2019, there were an estimated 17.7 million cases (incidence 228/100,000) with over 33,400 deaths (0.43/100,000). Both the absolute number and the incidence had increased from 1990 to 2019 (+ 38.8% and + 11.4%, respectively). The number of deaths and deaths per 100,000 declined during this period (- 21.8% and - 46.2%, respectively). These trends were largely similar in all 5 SDI groups. There was a significant difference in the incidence of AA between the SDI groups, with low SDI group having the lowest and high SDI group having the highest. The high SDI group had the lowest mortality rate (Kruskall-Wallis test, p < 0.001). The peak incidence was in the 15-19-year age group. The mortality rate increased exponentially from the third decade of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate of AA is declining worldwide, while the incidence is increasing. The peak incidence is in the 15-19-year group.

Appendectomy as Teaching Operation: No Compromise in Safety-An Audit of 17,106 Patients

OBJECTIVE

In a surgical career, teaching of surgical procedures plays a central role. In this study we want to evaluate the influence of teaching in appendectomies on the in-hospital outcome.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospectively, 26,436 cases from the national quality measurement database (AQC) between the years 2009 and 2017 were evaluated using the diagnosis and the procedure codes. Included were all cases with appendicitis (International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes K35-K37), surgical treatment (appendectomy), and a documented teaching status of the procedure. Variables were sought in bivariate and multivariate analyses. The occurrence of any complication was the primary outcome, whereas in-hospital mortality was the secondary outcome.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 17,106 patients with a mean age of 37 ± 19 years remained for final analysis. A total of 6267 operations (37%), were conducted as teaching-operations. Seventy-four percent of all teaching procedures were performed by residents.

RESULTS

We found no statistical association between teaching operations and complication rates or mortality. However, the teaching group showed longer duration of surgery (+ 11%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no influence of the training status of the appendectomy procedure on complication rates and in-hospital mortality. However, there was a prolonged duration of surgery. Despite these statistically significant differences, a comparable clinical outcome was observed in all patients, thus justifying the benefits of resident training.

A novel nomogram for the differential diagnosis between advanced and early appendicitis in pediatric patients

Aim: To develop a nomogram for differential diagnosis between advanced and early pediatric appendicitis (PA). Patients & methods: We retrospectively studied 669 PA patients. Patient characteristics and 24 serum markers were subjected to univariate and multivariate analysis, based on which the nomogram was constructed. Results: Fibrin degradation product, CRP and Na⁺ differed significantly between the advanced and early PA. The value of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.8602, which was greater than that of a single serum marker. Furthermore, the nomogram showed better discriminative ability than the biomarker alone. Notably, validation indicated high stability and reproducibility. Conclusion: The nomogram is superior to the serum marker alone, and may hold promise in clinical application.

Meta-analysis of studies comparing conservative treatment with antibiotics and appendectomy for acute appendicitis in the adult

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy is considered the first treatment choice for appendicitis. However, controversy exists since conservative therapy is associated with fewer complications than appendectomy for patients with acute appendicitis (AA). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes between conservative therapy and appendectomy in the management of adult AA.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to screen eligible clinical studies. Subgroup analyses of the uncomplicated population, complicated population and mixed population of randomized clinical trials were subsequently performed. Clinical outcomes included the overall effective rate of treatment, complication rate, relapse rate (reoperation rate) and overall length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Eleven trials totalling 2751 patients (conservative = 1463, appendectomy = 1288) were analysed. Patients receiving conservative treatment had a lower overall effective rate (OR: 0.11 ~ 0.17) and complication rate (OR: 0.21 ~ 0.51). The conservative group had a higher reoperation rate (5.6, 95% CI: 3.1% ~ 10.2%) than the appendectomy group (OR: 9.58 ~ 14.29). Conservative treatment was associated with a shorter overall length of stay (0.47 day, 95% CI: 0.45 ~ 0.5 day) than appendectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

For both uncomplicated and complicated adult AA, non-operative management with antibiotics was associated with significantly fewer complications and a shorter length of stay but a lower effective rate and higher relapse rate.

Apendicectomía por único puerto asistida por laparoscopia versus técnica abierta convencional localizada, en pacientes con apendicitis aguda en el Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael

Introducción. La apendicectomía por puerto único, asistida por laparoscopia, ofrece una alternativa terapéutica en el abordaje de la apendicitis aguda. En el presente estudio, se evalúa el beneficio terapéutico de la técnica por único puerto asistida por laparoscopia y se compara esta técnica con la apendicectomía abierta. Materiales y métodos. Se trata de un estudio observacional analítico retrospectivo de cohorte, llevado a cabo en el Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael, de Bogotá. Se incluyeron 106 pacientes mayores de 15 años con apendicitis aguda, que fueron sometidos a apendicectomía por puerto único, asistida por laparoscopia o apendicectomía abierta. La relación entre el grupo con apendicectomía por laparoscopia y el de técnica abierta, fue de 1:1. Se incluyeron variables sociodemográficas, clínicas y quirúrgicas (tiempo quirúrgico, frecuencia de infección del sitio operatorio, estancia hospitalaria, dolor, reingresos y resultado estético). Resultados. La edad promedio fue de 32 años y la mayoría de los pacientes eran de sexo masculino. El tiempo operatorio fue menor en los casos de apendicectomía por puerto único, asistida por laparoscopia, con un promedio de 34,1 minutos. Según la escala análoga, el dolor posoperatorio fue de 2,2 con la técnica laparoscópica y de 3,2 con la apendicectomía abierta (p<0,05). Hubo ocho veces más reingresos entre los casos de apendicectomía abierta en comparación con la apendicectomía por un puerto, y el resultado estético fue satisfactorio en todos con esta última técnica. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la estancia hospitalaria o la infección del sitio operatorio. La razón de momios (odds ratio, OR) fue inferior a 1 en variables como dolor, reingreso y menor tiempo quirúrgico, lo cual indica una menor probabilidad, en los que se usó un solo puerto. Discusión. La técnica por un solo puerto es segura, reproducible, equiparable en términos de días de estancia hospitalaria e infección de sitio operatorio, e incluso, produce mejores resultados en el tiempo quirúrgico, las escalas de dolor y el número de reingresos.

Perioperative stroke associated in-hospital morbidity and in-hospital mortality in common non-vascular non-neurological surgery

Perioperative stroke in non-vascular, non-neurological surgery is a potential cause of high levels of in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Although, perioperative stroke following non-vascular and non-neurological surgery is a relatively infrequent event; high surgical volume results in thousands of patients experiencing neurological deficits. We aim to determine if perioperative stroke is an independent risk factor for 30-day in-hospital morbidity and mortality following common non-vascular non-neurological surgery. This is a retrospective analysis of 4,264,963 surgical procedures identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from the years 2000 through 2011. The exposure of interest was stroke within 30 days of total knee arthroscopy, total hip arthroscopy, lung segmentation and resection, appendectomy, hemicolectomy, cholecystectomy, and lysis of peritoneal adhesions. Study outcomes were in-hospital mortality and in-hospital morbidity. Our study found an in-hospital morbidity, in-hospital mortality, and perioperative stroke rate of 5.5%, 0.8%, and 0.2%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed perioperative stroke to be a significant independent predictor (p < 0.001) of length of stay exceeding 14 days (OR = 4.55, 95% CI: 4.21-4.91), cardiovascular complications (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.75-2.19), pulmonary complications (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.89-2.27). The impact of perioperative stroke on in-hospital mortality was (OR = 8.53, 95% CI: 7.87-9.25), whereas cardiovascular complications impact on in-hospital mortality was (OR = 8.36, 95% CI = 7.67-9.10, p < 0.001). This study identified perioperative stroke as an independent predictor of 30-day in-hospital morbidity and mortality following non-vascular, non-neurological surgery.

Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Over the last three decades, laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) has become the routine treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The role of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis (gangrenous and/or perforated) remains controversial due to concerns of an increased incidence of post-operative intra-abdominal abscesses (IAA) in LA compared to open appendicectomy (OA). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of LA versus OA for complicated appendicitis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Database for randomised controlled trials (RCT) and case-control studies (CCS) that compared LA with OA for complicated appendicitis.

RESULTS

Data from three RCT and 30 CCS on 6428 patients (OA 3,254, LA 3,174) were analysed. There was no significant difference in the rate of IAA (LA = 6.1% vs. OA = 4.6%; OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.71-1.47, p = 0.91). LA for complicated appendicitis has decreased overall post-operative morbidity (LA = 15.5% vs. OA = 22.7%; OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.31-0.59, p < 0.0001), wound infection, (LA = 4.7% vs. OA = 12.8%; OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.19-0.36, p < 0.001), respiratory complications (LA = 1.8% vs. OA = 6.4%; OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.13-0.49, p < 0.001), post-operative ileus/small bowel obstruction (LA = 3.1% vs. OA = 3.6%; OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.42-1.0, p = 0.048) and mortality rate (LA = 0% vs. OA = 0.4%; OR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.61, p = 0.008). LA has a significantly shorter hospital stay (6.4 days vs. 8.9 days, p = 0.02) and earlier resumption of solid food (2.7 days vs. 3.7 days, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

These results clearly demonstrate that LA for complicated appendicitis has the same incidence of IAA but a significantly reduced morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay compared with OA. The finding of complicated appendicitis at laparoscopy is not an indication for conversion to open surgery. LA should be the preferred treatment for patients with complicated appendicitis.

Cytokines and Chemokines in Pediatric Appendicitis: A Multiplex Analysis of Inflammatory Protein Mediators

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to demonstrate the potential of precision medicine to describe the inflammatory landscape present in children with suspected appendicitis. Our primary objective was to determine levels of seven inflammatory protein mediators previously associated with intra-abdominal inflammation (C-reactive protein-CRP, procalcitonin-PCT, interleukin-6 (IL), IL-8, IL-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1-MCP-1, and serum amyloid A-SAA) in a cohort of children with suspected appendicitis. Subsequently, using a multiplex proteomics approach, we examined an expansive array of novel candidate cytokine and chemokines within this population.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of targeted proteomics data from Alberta Sepsis Network studies. Plasma mediator levels, analyzed by Luminex multiplex assays, were evaluated in children aged 5-17 years with nonappendicitis abdominal pain (NAAP), acute appendicitis (AA), and nonappendicitis sepsis (NAS). We used multivariate regression analysis to evaluate the seven target proteins, followed by decision tree and heat mapping analyses for all proteins evaluated.

RESULTS

185 children were included: 83 with NAAP, 79 AA, and 23 NAS. Plasma levels of IL-6, CRP, MCP-1, PCT, and SAA were significantly different in children with AA compared to those with NAAP (p < 0.001). Expansive proteomic analysis demonstrated 6 patterns in inflammatory mediator profiles based on severity of illness. A decision tree incorporating the proteins CRP, ferritin, SAA, regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), monokine induced by gamma interferon (MIG), and PCT demonstrated excellent specificity (0.920) and negative predictive value (0.882) for children with appendicitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiplex proteomic analyses described the inflammatory landscape of children presenting to the ED with suspected appendicitis. We have demonstrated the feasibility of this approach to identify potential novel candidate cytokines/chemokine patterns associated with a specific illness (appendicitis) amongst those with a broad ED presentation (abdominal pain). This approach can be modelled for future research initiatives in pediatric emergency medicine.

The Use of Routine Blood Cultures in Pediatric Appendicitis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the proportion of true-positive blood culture results in children presenting to the ED with suspected appendicitis. To describe the current practice of obtaining blood cultures in children with suspected appendicitis.

METHODS

We performed a 2-year retrospective health record review of all children aged 2 through 17 years investigated for suspected appendicitis at a tertiary Pediatric Emergency Department. Subjects were identified by searching (a) institutional records for ICD-10-CA coding, (b) diagnostic imaging records of ultrasounds for appendicitis, and (c) surgical database records for nonincidental appendectomies. Abstracted demographic and clinical data were matched to regional laboratory services data to describe the performance and result of blood cultures.

RESULTS

Overall, 1315 children investigated for appendicitis were reviewed. Seven hundred fifty (57.0%) were girls, the average age was 11.7 years (SD, 4.0). Blood cultures were obtained in 288 (21.9%) of 1315 patients. Of the 11 (3.8%) cultures that were positive, only 1 (0.35%) was a true positive. Young age, high triage acuity, and presence of fever were associated with the acquisition of cultures (P < 0.001 for all). The proportion of children undergoing appendectomy and the negative appendectomy rate was similar between those with and without blood culture (P = 0.10 and P = 0.96, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

True-positive blood cultures are very rare in children presenting to the ED with suspected appendicitis. Given the potential for false-positive cultures and the social/economic implications of initial testing/retesting of false positives, the use of routine blood cultures for children with suspected appendicitis is not supported.

Mortality Related to Appendectomy; a Population Based Analysis over Two Decades in Finland

OBJECT

To define the mortality rate of appendectomy patients and appendectomy-related risk factors.

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy has been considered as a safe operation and negative appendectomies acceptable in order to avoid perforations. There are few publications on appendectomy-related mortality. Removal of a normal appendix has been suggested to be related to a higher mortality rate versus removal of an inflamed appendix.

METHODS

Data on all appendectomy patients between 1990 and 2010 in Finland were retrieved from the Discharge Register of the National Institute for Health and Welfare and combined with data from the Death Certificate Register of Statistics Finland. Thirty-day mortality was identified and compared with overall mortality. Detailed information from death certificates of patients dying within 30-day post-surgery was collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Over the study period, the thirty-day post-appendectomy mortality rate was 2.1/1000. Increased mortality was found in patients over 60 years of age. Negative appendectomy and complicated appendicitis were related to mortality. The negative appendectomy rate was higher in patients older than 40 years of age. During the study period, both mortality and the rate of negative appendectomies decreased, while the rate of laparoscopic appendectomies increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-appendectomy mortality is related to both negative appendectomies and complicated appendicitis. Diagnostic accuracy is fundamental in the care of patients with acute appendicitis, especially in the elderly. Improved diagnostic accuracy may have reduced mortality over the last two decades in Finland.

Meaningful standard of reference for appendiceal perforation: pathology, surgery, or both?

Purpose

This retrospective study was aimed to determine if appendiceal perforation identified pathologically but not surgically is clinically meaningful.

Methods

The study consists of 2 parts. First, we reviewed 74 studies addressing appendiceal perforation published in 2012 and 2013. Second, in a cross-sectional study, we classified 1,438 adolescents and adults (mean age, 29.3 ± 8.4 years; 785 men) with confirmed appendicitis as “nonperforation” (n = 1,083, group 1), “pathologically-identified perforation” (n = 55, group 2), “surgically-identified perforation” (n = 202, group 3), or “pathologically- and surgically-identified perforation” (n = 98, group 4). The 4 groups were compared for the frequency of laparoscopic appendectomy and the length of hospital stay using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

The reference standard for appendiceal perforation was frequently missing or inconsistent in the previous studies. Laparoscopic appendectomies were less frequent in groups 3 (52.5%, P = 0.001) and 4 (65%, P = 0.040) than in group 1 (70.7%), while group 2 (73%, P = 0.125) did not significantly differ from group 1. Median hospital stays were 2.9, 3.0, 5.1, and 6.0 days for groups 1–4, respectively. Prolonged hospital stay (≥3.7 days) was more frequent in groups 3 (77.7%, P < 0.001) and 4 (89%, P < 0.001) than in group 1 (23.4%), while group 2 (35%, P = 0.070) did not significantly differ from group 1.

Conclusion

We recommend using surgical rather than pathologic findings as the reference standard for the presence of appendiceal perforation in future investigations.

Derivation and validation of the APPEND score: an acute appendicitis clinical prediction rule

BACKGROUND

Although many clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for appendicitis exist, none have been developed for a New Zealand population presenting with right iliac fossa (RIF) pain. The aim of this study was to derive and validate an appendicitis CPR for our population.

METHOD

This is a retrospective review of all patients from December 2010 to February 2012 of at least 15 years of age presenting to the general surgery service with RIF pain. Patient data were divided into derivation and validation groups. Univariate and multiple regression analyses identified significant predictors of appendicitis which were used to construct a CPR. A retrospective validation study was then performed and the CPR was refined accordingly. Finally, the accuracy of the CPR was tested.

RESULTS

The final components of the new CPR, the APPEND score, were Anorexia, migratory Pain, local Peritonism, Elevated C-reactive protein, Neutrophilia and male gender (Dude). This CPR has an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84. The CPR can stratify patients into low, intermediate and high-risk groups which may standardize patient care and reduce the negative appendicectomy rate.

CONCLUSION

A new CPR for predicting appendicitis, in patients presenting with RIF pain, has been derived and validated for use in our population. A prospective study to further evaluate its performance is required.

Severe Complications of Laparoscopic and Conventional Appendectomy Reported to the Finnish Patient Insurance Centre

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy is considered a safe operation, the related complications being minor. Negative exploration is an accepted procedure to avoid complications of appendicitis. Treatment with antibiotics is under debate as a primary treatment for appendicitis. The aim of this study was to collect and analyze detailed information on complications and morbidity related to appendectomy using the information of the nationwide Patient Insurance Association (PIA) database and to study the incidence of patient claims and compensated injuries related to appendectomy in Finland.

METHODS

Patients' claims from 1990 to 2010 were collected from the PIA register. Complications were classified using the accordion severity grading system. Severe complications were selected for more detailed analyses. Laparoscopic and open surgeries were compared. Factors related to compensated claims were assessed. For statistical analysis, Fisher's exact test, logistic multivariate regression, and the Mann-Kendall function were used.

RESULTS

Appendectomy complications leading to a patient insurance claim in Finland are rare (0.2 %). The rate of patients' claims after laparoscopic surgery was higher than after open surgery (p < 0.001), but the rate of compensated claims was equal. During the study period, complications after laparoscopic procedures more often led to additional surgery or organ failure (p = 0.03). Of the patients with a compensated injury, only 57 % had appendicitis. Preoperative computed tomography was used in only 6 % of these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient injuries and claims regarding severe complications after appendectomy are rare. The complications related to laparoscopic appendectomy were more severe than those of open surgery.

Predictive factors and outcomes of negative appendectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess predictive factors for negative appendectomy and to evaluate the outcomes of negative appendectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 4,878 patients who underwent appendectomy at our institution from January 2008 to December 2014 was performed.

RESULTS

Younger age (≤15 years), normal white blood cell count, appendix diameter of less than 6 mm on computed tomography (CT), and CT grade less than 3 were found to be independent predictive factors for negative appendectomy. When complications were investigated according to the results of pathologic diagnosis, negative appendectomy had more complications than appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis, and this was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

When CT findings are equivocal, in deciding to operate for acute appendicitis, additional ultrasonography can be performed. Furthermore, if the patient is younger than 15 years and the white blood cell count is normal, it is recommended to monitor changes in symptoms a little longer rather than operating hastily.

Is acute appendicitis still misdiagnosed?

OBJECTIVE

The optimal diagnostics and treatment of acute appendicitis continues to be a challenge. A false positive diagnosis of appendicitis may lead to an unnecessary operation, which has been appropriately termed negative appendectomy. The aim of our study was to identify the effectiveness of preoperative investigations in preventing negative appendectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on adult patients who underwent operation for suspected acute appendicitis from 2008 to 2013 at Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos. Patients were divided into two groups: group A underwent an operation, where appendix was found to be normal (non-inflamed); group B underwent an appendectomy for inflamed appendix. Groups were compared for preoperative data, investigations, treatment results and pathology findings.

RESULTS

554 patients were included in the study. Preoperative laboratory tests results of hemoglobin, hematocrit concentrations and white blood cell count were significantly higher in group B (p<0.001). Ultrasonography was performed for 78 % of patients in group A and 74 % in group B and did not provide any statistically significant results. Comparing Alvarado score results, there were more patients with Alvarado score less than 7 in group A than in group B. In our large series we could find only four independent risk factors, and they could only account for 24 % of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, acute appendicitis is still often misdiagnosed and the ratio of negative appendectomies remains rather high. Additional investigations such as observation and computed tomography should be used to prevent this.

International normalized ratio and serum C-reactive protein are feasible markers to predict complicated appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic approach for complicated appendicitis is still controversial. We planned this study to analyze preoperative laboratory markers that may predict complications of appendicitis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent appendectomy were retrospectively recruited. They were divided into complicated appendicitis and non-complicated appendicitis groups and their preoperative laboratory results were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were included. Elevated international normalized ratio (INR) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were associated with complicated appendicitis (p = 0.001). On ROC curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC) of CRP and INR were 0.796 and 0.723, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

INR and CRP increased significantly in patients with complicated appendicitis. Further studies evaluating INR and CRP in patients undergoing conservative management for appendicitis are required.

Diagnostic Value of White Blood Cell and C-Reactive Protein in Pediatric Appendicitis

Background. Acute appendicitis (AA) associated with acute phase reaction is the most prevalent disease which requires emergency surgery. Its delayed diagnosis and unnecessarily performed appendectomies lead to numerous complications. In our study, we aimed to detect the role of WBC and CRP in the exclusion of acute and complicated appendicitis and diagnostic accuracy in pediatric age group. Methods. Appendectomized patient groups were constructed based on the results of histological evaluation. The area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was performed to examine diagnostic accuracy. Results. When WBC and CRP were used in combination, based on cut-off values of ≥13.1 × 10³/μL for WBC counts and ≥1.17 mg/dL for CRP level, diagnostic parameters were as follows: sensitivity, 98.7%; specificity, 71.3%; PPV, 50.6%; NPV, 99.5%; diagnostic accuracy, 77.6%; LR(+), 3.44; LR(−), 0.017. AUC values were 0.845 (95% CI 0.800–0.891) for WBC and 0.887 (95% CI 0.841–0.932) for CRP. Conclusions. For complicated appendicitis, CRP has the highest degree of diagnostic accuracy. The diagnosis of appendicitis should be made primarily based on clinical examination, and obviously more specific and systemic inflammatory markers are needed. Combined use of cut-off values of WBC (≥13100/μL) and CRP (≥1.17 mg/L) yields a higher sensitivity and NPV for the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis.

Delaying surgery to perform CT scans for suspected appendicitis decreases the rate of negative appendectomies without increasing the rate of perforation nor postoperative complications

PURPOSE

Negative appendectomies are costly and are embedded with unnecessary risks for the patients. A careful indication for surgery seems mandatory even more so, since conservative therapy emerges as a potential alternative to surgery. The aims of this population-based study were to analyze whether radiological examinations for suspected appendicitis decreased the rate of negative appendectomies without increasing the rate of perforation or worsening postoperative outcomes.

METHOD

This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective population-based database. The data collection included preoperative investigations and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Based on 2559 patients, the rate of negative appendectomies decreased significantly with the use of CT scan as compared to clinical evaluation only (9.3 vs 5 %, p = 0.019), whereas ultrasonography alone was not able to decrease this rate (9.3 vs 6.2 %, p = 0.074). Delaying surgery for radiological investigation did not increase the rate of perforation (18.1 vs 19.2 %; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.01; 0.8-1.3; p = 0.899). Postoperative complications (surgical reintervention, postoperative wound infection, postoperative hematoma, postoperative intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative ileus) were all comparable.

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, CT scan was the only radiological modality that significantly reduced the rate of negative appendectomy. The delay induced by such additional imaging did not increase perforation nor complication rates. Abdominal CT scans for suspected appendicitis should therefore be more frequently used if clinical findings are unconclusive.

Risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism following emergency appendicectomy in adults

Background

Appendicectomy is the commonest intra-abdominal emergency surgical procedure, and little is known regarding the magnitude and timing of the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after surgery. This study aimed to determine absolute and relative rates of symptomatic VTE following emergency appendicectomy.

Methods

A cohort study was undertaken using linked primary (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and secondary (Hospital Episode Statistics) care data of patients who had undergone emergency appendicectomy from 2001 to 2011. Crude rates and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for VTE were calculated using Poisson regression, compared with baseline risk in the year before appendicectomy.

Results

A total of 13 441 patients were identified, of whom 56 (0·4 per cent) had a VTE in the first year after surgery. The absolute rate of VTE was highest during the in-hospital period, with a rate of 91·29 per 1000 person-years, which was greatest in those with a length of stay of 7 days or more (267·12 per 1000 person-years). This risk remained high after discharge, with a 19·1- and 6·6-fold increased risk of VTE in the first and second months respectively after discharge, compared with the year before appendicectomy (adjusted IRR: month 1, 19·09 (95 per cent c.i. 9·56 to 38·12); month 2, 6·56 (2·62 to 16·44)).

Conclusion

The risk of symptomatic VTE following appendicectomy is relatively high during the in-hospital admission and remains increased after discharge. Trials of extended thromboprophylaxis are warranted in patients at particularly high risk.

The Place of Calprotectin, Lactoferrin, and High-Mobility Group Box 1 Protein on Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis with Children

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of serum calprotectin (CP), lactoferrin (LF), and high-mobility group protein B1 (HMGB-1) levels and fecal CP and LF levels in differential diagnosis of acute uncomplicated appendicitis from other causes of abdominal pain and further from complicated appendicitis. Totally, 120 children were included grouped into 4 as: healthy controls, patients with right lower quadrant pain with other than surgical causes, patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, and patients with complicated appendicitis. Serum CP, LF, HMGB-1, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and white blood cell (WBC) count were studied as well as the fecal CP and LF levels. There was a statistically significant difference between control group and both uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis groups, regarding all parameters. In diagnosis of complicated acute appendicitis, area under curve (AUC) for fecal LF, serum CP, and serum HMGB-1 were determined as 1.00 and the cutoff level was determined as 25 μg/g feces, 670 ng/mL, and 30 ng/mL, respectively. In differential diagnosis of uncomplicated and complicated AA, the most accurate parameter was fecal LF with an AUC of 0.977. At a 60 μg/g cutoff value for this variable, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 96.7, 93.3, and 95.0 %, respectively. In conclusion, HMGB-1, calprotectin, and lactoferrin constitute novel markers in diagnosis of AA. Moreover, their levels may be helpful for the clinicians to judge about the severity of the condition. Larger studies are warranted to determine the diagnostic potential of HMGB-1, LF, and CP in AA diagnosis.

Patient-centered outcomes research in appendicitis in children: Bridging the knowledge gap

PURPOSE

Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) aims to give patients a better understanding of the treatment options to enable optimal decision-making. As nonoperative alternatives are now being evaluated in children for acute appendicitis, we surveyed patients and their families regarding their knowledge of appendicitis and evaluated whether providing basic medical information would affect their perception of the disease and allow them to more rationally consider the treatment alternatives.

METHODS

Families of children aged 5-18 presenting to the Emergency Department with suspected appendicitis were recruited for a tablet-based interactive educational survey. One hundred subjects (caregivers and patients ≥ 15 years) were questioned before and after an education session about their understanding of appendicitis, including questions on three hypothetical treatment options: urgent appendectomy, antibiotics alone, or initial antibiotics followed by elective appendectomy. Subjects were clearly informed that urgent appendectomy is currently the standard of care.

RESULTS

Only 14% of respondents correctly identified the mortality rate of appendicitis (17 deaths/year according to the 2010 US census) when compared with other extremely rare causes of death. Fifty-four and 31% thought it was more common than death from lightning (40/year) and hunting-associated deaths (44/year), respectively. Eighty-two percent of respondents believed it "likely" or "very likely" that the appendix would rupture if operation was at all delayed, and 81% believed that rupture of the appendix would rapidly lead to severe complications and death. In univariate analysis, this perception was significantly more prevalent for mothers (odds ratio, (OR) 5.19, confidence interval (CI) 1.33-21.15), and subjects who knew at least one friend or relative who had a negative experience with appendicitis (OR 5.53, CI 1.40-25.47). Following education, these perceptions changed significantly (53% still believed that immediate operation was necessary, and 47% believed perforation led to great morbidity and potential mortality, P<0.001). In a survey of potential appendicitis treatment options, urgent appendectomy was considered a "good" or "very good" option by 74% of subjects, compared with 68% for antibiotics only without appendectomy and 49% for initial antibiotic therapy followed by elective outpatient appendectomy.

CONCLUSION

There was a striking knowledge gap in the participant perception of appendicitis. Appropriate education can correct anecdotally supported misconceptions. Adequate education may empower patients to make better-informed decisions about their medical care and may be important for future studies in alternative treatments for appendicitis in children.

Can new inflammatory markers improve the diagnosis of acute appendicitis?

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of appendicitis is difficult and resource consuming. New inflammatory markers have been proposed for the diagnosis of appendicitis, but their utility in combination with traditional diagnostic variables has not been tested. Our objective is to explore the potential of new inflammatory markers for improving the diagnosis of appendicitis.

METHODS

The diagnostic properties of the six most promising out of 21 new inflammatory markers (interleukin [IL]-6, chemokine ligand [CXCL]-8, chemokine C-C motif ligand [CCL]-2, serum amyloid A [SAA], matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]-9, and myeloperoxidase [MPO]) were compared with traditional diagnostic variables included in the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score (right iliac fossa pain, vomiting, rebound tenderness, guarding, white blood cell [WBC] count, proportion neutrophils, C-reactive protein and body temperature) in 432 patients with suspected appendicitis by uni- and multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

Of the new inflammatory variables, SAA, MPO, and MMP9 were the strongest discriminators for all appendicitis (receiver operating characteristics [ROC] 0.71) and SAA was the strongest discriminator for advanced appendicitis (ROC 0.80) compared with defence or rebound tenderness, which were the strongest traditional discriminators for all appendicitis (ROC 0.84) and the WBC count for advanced appendicitis (ROC 0.89). CCL2 was the strongest independent discriminator beside the AIR score variables in a multivariable model. The AIR score had an ROC area of 0.91 and could correctly classify 58.3 % of the patients, with an accuracy of 92.9 %. This was not improved by inclusion of the new inflammatory markers.

CONCLUSION

The conventional diagnostic variables for appendicitis, as combined in the AIR score, is an efficient screening instrument for classifying patients as low-, indeterminate-, or high-risk for appendicitis. The addition of the new inflammatory variables did not improve diagnostic performance further.

The morbidity of negative appendicectomy

INTRODUCTION

The increased use of diagnostic laparoscopy for management of right iliac fossa pain may have lowered the threshold for removing normal appendices, particularly as there is a perception that this practice carries little additional morbidity. The aim of this retrospective audit was to determine the negative appendicectomy rate after laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) in our busy district hospital, and to compare the relative incidence and severity of complications after removal of an inflamed or non-inflamed appendix.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent LA in 2011-2012 were identified from theatre registers. Histology results were reviewed to differentiate between inflamed and normal appendices. Postoperative complications and events following discharge were identified via electronic patient records. Complication severity was stratified using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

Over 2 years, 467 LAs were performed, of which 143 (30.6%) were for normal appendices. Significantly more negative appendicectomies were performed in women (43%) than in men (17%) (p<0.0001). Complications were seen in 62 patients (13.3%). There was no significant difference between the complication rates for those who had an inflamed (16.6%) or non-inflamed (11.9%) appendix (p=0.141). Similarly, there was no difference in the severity of complications between these groups. Reoperation or invasive intervention was required after four negative appendicectomies (2.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

LA carries a similar morbidity regardless of whether the appendix is inflamed. Negative appendicectomy should not be undertaken routinely during laparoscopy for right iliac fossa pain.

Mortality from acute appendicitis is associated with complex disease and co-morbidity

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating mortality in patients with acute appendicitis focus on the outcomes of appendicectomy alone. We hypothesize this may not be representative of what happens in clinical practice as a small proportion of patients with acute appendicitis undergo procedures other than appendicectomy, for example, caecectomy or right hemicolectomy. To clarify the issue, the authors evaluated Australian adult patients who died with a primary diagnosis of acute appendicitis regardless of whether they underwent an operation or the type of operation performed.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of systematically collected mortality data from the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality was conducted on adults who died in hospital with a primary diagnosis of acute appendicitis between January 2009 and December 2012.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients died with a primary diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The median age was 83 years and the median number of co-morbidities was three. Four patients died without surgery due to their family's wishes. Twenty-two patients were treated surgically: five for right hemicolectomy, four for laparoscopic/McBurney appendicectomy, 10 for laparotomy with appendicectomy, two for unknown method of appendicectomy and one for open abscess drainage.

CONCLUSION

Most adult patients who died following surgery for acute appendicitis did not undergo simple appendicectomy but underwent more complicated procedures for complex appendicitis.

The NOTA Study (Non Operative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis): prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conservatively treated suspected appendicitis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of antibiotics treatment for suspected acute uncomplicated appendicitis and to monitor the long term follow-up of non-operated patients.

BACKGROUND

Right lower quadrant abdominal pain is a common cause of emergency department admission. The natural history of acute appendicitis nonoperatively treated with antibiotics remains unclear.

METHODS

In 2010, a total of 159 patients [mean AIR (Appendicitis Inflammatory Response) score = 4.9 and mean Alvarado score = 5.2] with suspected appendicitis were enrolled and underwent nonoperative management (NOM) with amoxicillin/clavulanate. The follow-up period was 2 years.

RESULTS

Short-term (7 days) NOM failure rate was 11.9%. All patients with initial failures were operated within 7 days. At 15 days, no recurrences were recorded. After 2 years, the overall recurrence rate was 13.8% (22/159); 14 of 22 patients were successfully treated with further cycle of amoxicillin/clavulanate. No major side effects occurred. Abdominal pain assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale and the visual analog scale; median Numeric Rating Scale score was 3 at 5 days and 2 after 7 days. Mean length of stay of nonoperatively managed patients was 0.4 days, and mean sick leave period was 5.8 days. Long-term efficacy of NOM treatment was 83% (118 patients recurrence free and 14 patients with recurrence nonoperatively managed). None of the single factors forming the Alvarado or AIR score were independent predictors of failure of NOM or long-term recurrence. Alvarado and AIR scores were the only independent predictive factors of NOM failure after multivariate analysis, but both did not correlate with recurrences. Overall costs of NOM and antibiotics were &OV0556;316.20 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotics for suspected acute appendicitis are safe and effective and may avoid unnecessary appendectomy, reducing operation rate, surgical risks, and overall costs. After 2 years of follow-up, recurrences of nonoperatively treated right lower quadrant abdominal pain are less than 14% and may be safely and effectively treated with further antibiotics.

Prophylactic Appendectomy during Laparoscopic Surgery for Other Conditions

Acute appendicitis remains the most common surgical emergency. Laparoscopy has gained increasing favor as a method of both investigating right iliac fossa pain and treating the finding of appendicitis. A question arises: what to do with an apparent healthy appendix discovered during laparoscopic surgery for other pathology. We present a case of unilateral hydroureteronephrosis complicated with rupture of the renal pelvis, due to gangrenous appendicitis with abscess of the right iliopsoas muscle and periappendicular inflammation in a 67-year-old woman, who underwent laparoscopic right annessiectomy for right ovarian cyst few years earlier, in which a healthy appendix was left inside. There is a lack of consensus in the literature about what to do with a normal appendix. The main argument for removing an apparently normal appendix is that endoluminal appendicitis may not be recognized during surgery, leading to concern that an abnormal appendix is left in place. Because of a lack of evidence from randomized trials, it remains unclear whether the benefits of routine elective coincidental appendectomy outweigh the costs and risks of morbidity associated with this prophylactic procedure. Nevertheless, it appears, from limited data, that women aged 35 years and under benefit most from elective coincidental appendectomy.

Short and long-term mortality after appendectomy in Sweden 1987 to 2006. Influence of appendectomy diagnosis, sex, age, co-morbidity, surgical method, hospital volume, and time period. A national population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Avoiding mortality is the ultimate goal when managing patients with suspected appendicitis. Previous studies have shown high mortality after negative appendectomy. This national cohort study analyzes short- and long-term mortality after appendectomy in relation to appendectomy diagnosis, age, co-morbidity, surgical method, hospital volume, and time period.

METHOD

A total of 223,543 appendectomy patients treated from 1987 to 2006 were identified from the Swedish National Patient Register and followed up via the Swedish Cause of Death Register. Analysis of mortality was conducted as Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) and by Cox multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Negative appendectomy was followed by a higher mortality in the short term (30-day Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR30d) 8.95, confidence interval (CI) 6.68-12.61) than after perforated appendicitis (SMR30d 6.39, CI 5.44-7.48), and remained increased for up to 5 years (SMR5yr 1.31, CI 1.16-1.47). Non-perforated appendicitis had a lower than expected long-term mortality (SMR5yr 0.72, CI 0.68-0.76). These differences remained after adjustment for covariates. Laparoscopic appendectomy had similar short-term mortality as open appendectomy but lower than expected long-term morality (SMR5yr 0.70, CI 0.62-0.78). Mortality was decreasing during the study period. Hospital volume had no influence on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative appendectomy is associated with excess short- and long-term mortality that remains after adjustment for known confounders, suggesting an association with underlying undetected morbidity. This motivates an improved preoperative diagnosis to avoid the additional trauma from unnecessary surgical interventions, but further studies are needed to investigate the cause of the increased long-term mortality and if this can be prevented by an improved follow-up of patients with negative appendectomy. Laparoscopic and open appendectomy have similar short-term mortality. The lower long-term mortality after non-perforated appendicitis and laparoscopic appendectomy suggest selection of healthier patients for these interventions. This possibility should be taken into account when comparing mortality after open and laparoscopic appendectomy.

Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Randomized studies have indicated that acute appendicitis may be treated by antibiotics without the need of surgery. However, concerns have been raised about selection bias of patients in such studies. Therefore, the present study was aimed to validate previous findings in randomized studies by a full-scale population-based application.

METHODS

All patients with acute appendicitis at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (May 2009 and February 2010) were offered intravenous piperacillin plus tazobactam according to our previous experience, followed by 9 days out-hospital oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole. Endpoints were treatment efficacy and complications. Efficient antibiotic treatment was defined as recovery without the need of surgery beyond 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 558 consecutive patients were hospitalized and treated due to acute appendicitis. Seventy-nine percent (n = 442) received antibiotics as first-line therapy and 20 % (n = 111) had primary surgery as the second-line therapy. Seventy-seven percent of patients on primary antibiotics recovered while 23 % (n = 100) had subsequent appendectomy due to failed initial treatment on antibiotics. Thirty-eight patients (11 %) of the 342 had experienced recurrent appendicitis at 1-year follow-up. Primary antibiotic treatment had fewer complications compared to primary surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based study confirms previous results of randomized studies. Antibiotic treatment can be offered as the first-line therapy to a majority of unselected patients with acute appendicitis without medical drawbacks other than the unknown risk for long-term relapse, which must be weighed against the unpredicted but well-known risk for serious major complications following surgical intervention.

Histological characterization of appendectomy specimens with intraoperative appearance of vascular injection

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis frequently needs acute surgical intervention. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and conventional open appendectomy (OA) are well established procedures, but appendectomy for intraoperative inconspicuous or vascular injected appendixes remains under debate because of potential postoperative morbidity. The aim of this study was to correlate intraoperative nonacute appendixes with histological and clinical outcome.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2009, a total of 1,017 patients underwent OA or LA. A total of 1,005 patients were enrolled with inclusion criteria of suspicious acute appendicitis preoperatively. One hundred twenty-nine of 1,005 patients had intraoperative normal, vascular injected or chronic appendixes that were defined as nonacute appendicitis. Intraoperative findings were correlated with histological results and clinical outcome of patients.

RESULTS

Of 129 (12.8 %) of 1,005 patients with macroscopically nonacute appendicitis intraoperatively, 16.3 % had normal findings, 81.4 % vascular injection, and 2.3 % chronic alterations; and 94.6 % of nonacute appendixes had histopathological alterations: 38.9 % chronic, 14.0 % neurogenic, 26.4 % acute, 13.2 % phlegmonous, and 2.3 % malignant. Coproliths were found in 21.7 % of patients, most in vascular injected appendixes. Four of seven patients with histopathological normal appendixes had coproliths. Morbidity rate was 2.3 %, with no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Appendiceal resection for intraoperative nonacute appendixes should be recommended because of high incidence of histopathological findings with low morbidity. In particular, chronic and neurogenous alterations cannot be predicted clinically or verified by radiological examination, but may cause recurrent symptoms.

The evolution of the appendectomy: from open to laparoscopic to single incision

Beginning with its initial description by Fitz in the 19th century, acute appendicitis has been a significant long-standing medical challenge; today it remains the most common gastrointestinal emergency in adults. Already in 1894, McBurney advocated for the surgical removal of the inflamed appendix and is credited with the initial description of an Open Appendectomy (OA). With the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, this classic approach evolved into a procedure with multiple, smaller incisions; a technique termed Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA). There is much literature describing the advantages of this newer approach. To name a few, patients have significantly less wound infections, reduced pain, and a reduction in ileus compared with the OA. In the past few years, Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy (SILA) has gained popularity as the next major evolutionary advancement in the removal of the appendix. Described as a pioneer in the era of "scarless surgery," it involves only one transumbilical incision. Patients are postulated to have reduced post-operative complications such as infection, hernias, and hematomas, as well as a quicker recovery time and less post-operative pain scores, in comparison to its predecessors. In this review, we explore the advancement of the appendectomy from open to laparoscopic to single incision.