Prognostic factors after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer and rationale for determining surgical indications: a retrospective analysis

The Ugly: Metastatic Colon Cancer-Surgical Options

Over 50% of patients with colorectal cancer develop metastatic disease. Although systemic therapy remains the backbone of palliative treatment, select patients may be candidates for surgical resection with curative intent. Given increasing evidence of the association between metastasectomy and prolonged survival, surgery has acquired an increasingly central role in the management of liver, lung, and peritoneal metastases. This is compounded by accumulating advances in local and systemic treatments that have allowed for expansion of the resectability pool, bringing the potential for curative surgical treatment to increasing numbers of patients with stage IV disease. However, as the boundaries of resectability are pushed, patient selection and consideration of tumor-related and technical factors are imperative to the identification of patients for whom surgery would be of the greatest benefit.

Transcontinental Differences in Management of Pulmonary Metastatic Disease: Europe

Several international registries, including 4 from Europe-Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons-are dedicated to addressing deficiencies in pulmonary metastasectomy research. The randomized PulMiCC and SABR-COMET trials provide contradictory outcomes and new randomized trials have been initiated. Europe's metastasectomy approach transitioned from open thoracotomy to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, with 72% of surgeons favoring minimally invasive methods by 2023. European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines recommend surgery for completely resectable lesions and propose ablative approaches as supplementary or alternative treatments for inoperable cases due to frailty or unfavorable anatomy.

Effects of location of primary tumor on survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The benefit of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with isolated lung metastases remains unclear, and failure to separate colon from rectal cancer may contribute. Using a large national database, we investigate whether PM is associated with survival benefits in patients presenting with CRC with synchronous lung metastases based on primary tumor location.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015 was queried to identify patients with stage IV CRC with isolated synchronous lung metastases at initial diagnosis. These patients were restricted to include only those in which the location of the primary tumor being either colon or rectum could be conclusively identified, and the primary site was resected. SEER-Medicare linked claims were also queried to identify cases of PM that were not adequately recorded in SEER alone. Patients were then analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) methods and multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From the SEER database 185,871 patients with metastatic CRC were identified. Only 588 had isolated synchronous lung metastases, with 441 with colon cancer and 147 with rectal cancer. PM was performed in 15.3% (n = 90) with two-thirds being colon cancer. Univariate K-M demonstrated worse OS for rectal cancer than colon cancer, which remained significant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

OS is associated with the site of primary CRC in patients undergoing PM. Distinct mutational and molecular characteristics differences between colon and rectal cancer may explain these findings and are an area for future research.

Recurrence-free survival curve for pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer plateaus at 3 years

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer (CRC) has encouraging results; however, specific criteria for lung resection and the timing of resection remain undetermined. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to examine the long-term prognosis and 10-year survival rates and analyze poor prognostic factors in patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from CRC. This retrospective, single-institution study included 156 patients with controlled primary CRC and metastases confined to the lungs or liver who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy between 2005 and 2022. Statistical analyses were conducted using the X2 and two-tailed Student's t test to compare variables. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the appropriate cut-off point for tumor size as a predictive factor of survival. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and non-parametric group comparisons were performed using log-rank tests. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 67% and 59%, respectively. Further, there was no recurrence 38 months post-surgery, and the RFS curve plateaued. Moreover, by 88 months post-surgery, no deaths occurred, and the OS curve plateaued. Multivariate analysis revealed that a pulmonary metastatic tumor >14 mm and disease-free interval <2 years indicated poor prognosis. The RFS curve for pulmonary metastasectomy may plateau approximately 3 years after surgery. Pulmonary metastasectomy can achieve long-term survival in selected patients with CRC. Furthermore, surgical resection of recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy may lead to better results. Thus, tumor size and disease-free interval may be independent prognostic factors.

Prognostic factors in pulmonary metastases resection from colorectal cancer: impact of right-sided colon cancer and early recurrence

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of resection of pulmonary metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Overall, 60 patients who underwent resection of PM from CRC between 2015 and 2021 at two institutions were reviewed. The primary outcome were overall survival (OS) and early recurrence after PM resection. The association between OS and right-sided colon cancer (RCC) was investigated. Early recurrence after PM resection was defined as recurrence within one year.

RESULTS

The 5-year OS after CRC resection was 83.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67.5-92.4) and after PM resection was 69.4% (95% CI 47.5-83.6). In total, 25 patients had recurrence after PM resection (16 within 1 year and 9 after 1 year). In multivariable analysis for OS, RCC (hazard ratio [HR] 4.370, 95% CI 1.020-18.73; p = 0.047) and early recurrence after resection of PM (HR 17.23, 95% CI 2.685-110.6; p = 0.003) were risk factors for poor OS. In multivariable analysis for early recurrence after PM resection, higher value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (> 5.0 mg/dL) before PM resection was a risk factor for early recurrence (HR 3.275, 95% CI 1.092-9.821; p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

The RCC and early recurrence after PM resection were poor prognosis factors of OS. Higher value of CEA before PM resection was an independent risk factor for early recurrence after resection of PM. Comparitive study between surgery and nonsurgery is necessary in patients with higher CEA values.

Stereotactic ablative brachytherapy versus percutaneous microwave ablation as salvage treatments for lung oligometastasis from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment for lung oligometastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging. This retrospective study aimed to compare the local tumor control, survival and procedure-related complications in CRC patients undergoing low-dose rate stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (L-SABT) versus percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for lung oligometastasis.

METHODS

Patients between November 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in the entire cohort as well as by stratified analysis based on the minimal ablation margin (MAM) around the tumor.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 122 patients: 74 and 48 in the brachytherapy and MWA groups, respectively, with a median follow-up of 30.5 and 35.3 months. The 1- and 3-year LTPFS rate was 54.1% and 40.5% in the brachytherapy group versus 58.3% and 41.7% in the MWA group (P = 0.524 and 0.889, respectively). The 1- and 3-year OS rate was 75.7% and 48.6% versus 75.0% and 50.0% (P = 0.775 and 0.918, respectively). Neither LTPFS nor OS differed significantly between the patients with MAM of 5-10 mm versus > 10 mm. Pulmonary complication rate did not differ in the overall analysis, but was significantly higher in the MWA group in the subgroup analysis that only included patients with lesion within 10 mm from the key structures (P = 0.005). The increased complications was primarily bronchopleural fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the caveats associated with radioisotope use in L-SABT, MWA is generally preferable. In patients with lesion within 10 mm from the key pulmonary structures, however, L-SABT could be considered as an alternative due to lower risk of bronchopleural fistula.

Reduced chemokine C-C motif ligand 1 expression may negatively regulate colorectal cancer progression at liver metastatic sites

Colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastasis, albeit a stage-IV disease, is completely curable by surgical resection in selected patients. In addressing the molecular basics of this phenomenon, differentially expressed genes at primary and liver metastatic sites were screened by RNA sequencing with the use of paraffin-embedded surgical specimens. Chemokine C-C motif ligand 1 (CCL1), a chemotactic factor for a ligand of the chemokine C-C motif receptor 8 (CCR8), was isolated as one of the differentially expressed genes. Histological analysis revealed that the number of CCL1-positive cells, mainly tumour associated macrophages (TAMs) located in the stroma of CRC, decreased significantly at liver metastatic sites, while the expression level of CCR8 on CRC remained unchanged. To explore the biological significance of the CCL1-CCR8 axis in CRC, CCR8-positive CRC cell line Colo320DM was used to assess the effect of the CCL1-CCR8 axis on major signalling pathways, epithelial mesenchymal transition induction and cell motility. Upon stimulation of recombinant CCL1 (rCCL1), phosphorylation of AKT was observed in Colo320DM cells; on the other hand, the corresponding significant increase in MMP-2 levels demonstrated by RT-qPCR was nullified by siRNA (siCCR8). In the scratch test, rCCL1 treatment significantly increased the motility of Colo320DM cells, which was similarly nullified by siCCR8. Thus, the activation of the CCL1-CCR8 axis is a positive regulator of CRC tumour progression. Reduced CCL1 expression of TAMs at liver metastatic sites may partly explain the unique slow tumour progression of CRC, thus providing for a grace period for radical resection of metastatic lesions.

The percutaneous management of pulmonary metastases

Local treatment of lung metastases has been in the front scene since late 90s when an international registry of thoracic surgery reported a median overall survival of 35 months in resected patients versus 15 months in non-resected patients. Today, other local therapies are available for patients with oligometastatic lung disease, including image guided thermal ablation, such as ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation. Image-guided ablation is increasingly offered, and now recommended in guidelines as option to surgery. Today, the size of the target tumour remains the main driver of success and selection of patients with limited tumour size allowing for local tumour control in the range of 90% in most recent and larger series targeting lung metastases up to 3.5 cm. Overall survival exceeding five-years in large series of thermal ablation for lung metastases from colorectal origin are align with outcome of same patients treated with surgical resection. Moreover, thermal ablation in such population allows for one-year chemotherapy holidays in all comers and over 18 months in lung only metastatic patients, allowing for improved patient quality of life and preserving further lines of systemic treatment when needed. Tolerance of thermal ablation is excellent and better than surgery with no lost in respiratory function, allowing for repeated treatment when needed. In the future, it is likely that practice of lung surgery for small oligometastatic lung disease will decrease, and that minimally invasive techniques will replace surgery in such indications. Randomized study will be difficult to obtain as demonstrated by discontinuation of many studies testing the hypothesis of surgery versus observation, or surgery versus SBRT.

Applying machine learning techniques to predict the risk of lung metastases from rectal cancer: a real-world retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Metastasis in the lungs is common in patients with rectal cancer, and it can have severe consequences on their survival and quality of life. Therefore, it is essential to identify patients who may be at risk of developing lung metastasis from rectal cancer.

METHODS

In this study, we utilized eight machine-learning methods to create a model for predicting the risk of lung metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. Our cohort consisted of 27,180 rectal cancer patients selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017 for model development. Additionally, we validated our models using 1118 rectal cancer patients from a Chinese hospital to evaluate model performance and generalizability. We assessed our models' performance using various metrics, including the area under the curve (AUC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR), the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. Finally, we applied the best model to develop a web-based calculator for predicting the risk of lung metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.

RESULT

Our study employed tenfold cross-validation to assess the performance of eight machine-learning models for predicting the risk of lung metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. The AUC values ranged from 0.73 to 0.96 in the training set, with the extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model achieving the highest AUC value of 0.96. Moreover, the XGB model obtained the best AUPR and MCC in the training set, reaching 0.98 and 0.88, respectively. We found that the XGB model demonstrated the best predictive power, achieving an AUC of 0.87, an AUPR of 0.60, an accuracy of 0.92, and a sensitivity of 0.93 in the internal test set. Furthermore, the XGB model was evaluated in the external test set and achieved an AUC of 0.91, an AUPR of 0.63, an accuracy of 0.93, a sensitivity of 0.92, and a specificity of 0.93. The XGB model obtained the highest MCC in the internal test set and external validation set, with 0.61 and 0.68, respectively. Based on the DCA and calibration curve analysis, the XGB model had better clinical decision-making ability and predictive power than the other seven models. Lastly, we developed an online web calculator using the XGB model to assist doctors in making informed decisions and to facilitate the model's wider adoption (https://share.streamlit.io/woshiwz/rectal_cancer/main/lung.py).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we developed an XGB model based on clinicopathological information to predict the risk of lung metastasis in patients with rectal cancer, which may help physicians make clinical decisions.

Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer: Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes of Thermal Ablation

The widespread use of imaging as well as the efforts conducted through screening campaigns has dramatically increased the early detection rate of lung cancer. Historically, the management of lung cancer has heavily relied on surgery. However, the increased proportion of patients with comorbidities has given significance to less invasive therapeutic options like minimally invasive surgery and image-guided thermal ablation, which could precisely target the tumor without requiring general anesthesia or a thoracotomy. Thermal ablation is considered low-risk for lung tumors smaller than 3 cm that are located in peripheral lung and do not involve major blood vessels or airways. The rationale for ablative therapies relies on the fact that focused delivery of energy induces cell death and pathologic necrosis. Image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation therapies are established techniques in the local treatment of hepatic, renal, bone, thyroid and uterine lesions. In the lung, and specifically in the setting of metastatic disease, the 3 main indications for lung ablation are to serve as (1) curative intent, (2) as a strategy to achieve a chemo-holiday in oligometastatic disease, and (3) in oligoprogressive disease. Following these premises, the current paper aims to review the rationale, indications, and outcomes of thermal ablation as a form of local therapy in the treatment of primary and metastatic lung disease.

Survival Outcomes of Complete Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Purpose

Metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is relatively poor; however, depending on the selected cases, pulmonary metastasectomy can be a practical therapeutic option. This study aimed to identify the outcomes of complete metastasectomy based on each primary site and to investigate unfavorable prognostic factors.

Patients and Methods

We used the database from the Metastatic Lung Tumour Study Group of Japan. Between November 1980 and April 2017, 231 patients were deemed eligible. According to anatomy and the current epidemiology of HNSCC, the patients were divided into three groups: nasopharynx, oropharynx, and salivary gland (n = 40, Group 1), oral cavity, tongue, and paranasal sinuses (n = 69, Group 2), and larynx and hypopharynx (n = 122, Group 3).

Results

The 5-year overall survival after complete pulmonary metastasectomy was 58.5%, 25.0%, and 46.9% in G1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed unfavourable prognostic factors to be G2, and pathological maximum diameter was >20 mm. Therefore, on dividing group 1 and 3 with or without diameter, the 5-year overall survival was significantly worse in HNSCC with a diameter >20 mm (n = 74) than that in the remnant (n = 88; 61.9% vs 35.5%; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

According to the multi-institutional Japanese data, pulmonary metastasectomy from HNSCC indicates a potential survival benefit. Oral cavity, tongue, and paranasal sinuses cancer, and tumour size (>20 mm) were poor prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy from head and neck cancer.

Solitary anterior mediastinal lymph node metastasis with pericardial invasion from colon cancer: A case report

Colorectal cancer commonly metastasizes to the regional lymph nodes, liver, lungs and peritoneum. At present, mediastinal lymph node metastasis from colorectal cancer is uncommon and poorly understood. The present study reported a case of solitary anterior mediastinal lymph node metastasis with pericardial invasion from transverse colon cancer. An 82-year-old woman had a history of colectomy with regional lymph node dissection for transverse colon cancer (T1N1bM0 stage IIIA in the UICC classification). The patient had no symptoms, but follow-up contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed an anterior mediastinal tumor compressing the heart 18 months after colectomy. The tumor showed fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography. Resection of the anterior mediastinal tumor with pericardiectomy was performed. The tumor was 35x25 mm in size and was histopathologically characterized to be adenocarcinoma. These cells expressed cytokeratin (CK)20 and caudal-type homeobox protein 2 but not CK7 and thyroid transcription factor 1 on immunohistochemical analysis, confirming a diagnosis of metachronous mediastinal metastasis originating from colon cancer. The tumor cells invaded the adjacent pericardium and diaphragm pathologically. The patient has lived without recurrence 8 months after the surgery for mediastinal metastasis. In conclusion, clinicians should consider metastasis to the mediastinum during follow-up in patients with colorectal cancer. Surgery may be the most reliable treatment for solitary anterior mediastinal lymph node metastasis, preventing carcinomatous pericarditis through direct pericardial invasion.

Time to Incurable Recurrence for Patients Treated With Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Probability of cure is important for patients with lung metastasis who must decide whether to undergo metastasectomy. Although progression-free survival (PFS) is thought to reflect this, it does not include curative effects by repeat metastasectomy. Thus, the authors developed a new indicator, time to incurable recurrence (TTIR), in which only incurable recurrence was set as an event that included death, with incurable recurrence defined as recurrence not treated by definitive local therapy (DLT), recurrence treated by DLT but with PFS maintained less than 2 years, or recurrence followed by re-recurrence.

METHODS

This multi-institutional study included 339 patients who underwent lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer between 1990 and 2008.

RESULTS

Among the 339 patients, 191 experienced recurrence, 77 received DLT for recurrence, 38 had a PFS of 2 years or longer after the treatment, and 33 had maintained a PFS at the last follow-up date. The patients had PFS ranging from 39 to 212 months (median, 101 months). The 5-year OS, PFS, and TTIR rates were respectively 63.4%, 42.2%, and 51.9%. The TTIR curve was similar to the OS curve 7 years after the initial metastasectomy. The difference between TTIR and PFS at 7 years was 9.7%, indicating probability of cure by repeat DLT. Multivariable analysis showed different prognostic factors among OS, PFS, and TTIR.

CONCLUSION

At the initial metastasectomy, TTIR may reflect probability of a cure, including cure by repeat DLT, and can be used to analyze prognostic factors associated with cure.

Survival and prognostic factors of isolated pulmonary metastases originating from colorectal cancer: An 8-year single-center experience

Background

Isolated pulmonary metastasis (IPM) is a rare entity that accounts for 10% of pulmonary metastases seen in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aims to evaluate the overall 5-year survival of IPM originating from CRC and identify potential prognostic factors affecting the overall survival (OS).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary care center. The study included all patients diagnosed with CRC aged 18–75 years who underwent primary tumor resection with curative intent between 2008 and 2015, and developed IPM. Patients with no follow-up and those with extra-pulmonary metastases were excluded.

Results

The prevalence of IPM in the overall CRC cases was 4.18% (20/478 patients). The mean age of patients with IPM was 52.7 ± 12.9 years. Ten patients had synchronous IPM (50%), thirteen had unilateral (65%), and eleven underwent metastasectomy (55%). The 5-year OS was 40%, and the mean OS was 3.12 ± 1.85 years. Several factors were found to be associated with a favorable outcome, which include unilateral IPM (3.69 vs. 2.07 years; P = 0.024), metachronous (4.25 vs. 2.14 years; P = 0.017), metastasectomy (4.81 vs. 1.83 years; P = 0.005). In addition, mortality was likely to be decreased by more than 90% after metastasectomy (unadjusted odds ratio = 0.071; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.8; P = 0.032).

Conclusions

Forty percent of the included patients survived the 5-year follow-up. Better survival was associated with the metastases being unilateral, metachronous, and metastasectomy. Mortality was lower in patients with pulmonary recurrence after metastasectomy.

•

IPM showed an incidence of 4% among resectable CRC patients.

•

IPM demonstrated 40% 5-year overall survival.

•

Survival was not influenced by age, comorbidities, KRAS mutation, nor the number of pulmonary lesions.

•

Unilateral lesions, metachronous metastases, and metastasectomy were associated with a favorable outcome.

•

The mortality was likely to be decreased by >90% after metastasectomy.

Thermal ablation in the management of oligometastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To review available evidence on thermal ablation of oligometastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Technical and cancer specific considerations for percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of oligometastatic colorectal metastases in the liver and lung were reviewed. Ablation outcomes are compared to surgical and radiation therapy literature.

RESULTS

The application of thermal ablation varies widely based on tumor burden, technical expertise, and local cancer triage algorithms. Ablation can be performed in combination or in lieu of other cancer treatments. For surgically non-resectable liver metastases, a randomized trial has demonstrated the superiority of thermal ablation combined with chemotherapy compared to systemic chemotherapy alone in term of progression-free survival and overall survival (OS), with 5-, and 8-year OS of 43.1% and 35.9% in the combined arm vs. 30.3% and 8.9% in the chemotherapy alone arm. As ablation techniques and technology improve, the role of percutaneous thermal ablation may expand even into surgically resectable disease. Many of the prognostic factors for better OS after local treatment of lung metastases are the same for surgery and thermal ablation, including size and number of metastases, disease-free interval, complete resection/ablation, negative carcinoembryonic antigen, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and controlled extra-pulmonary metastases. When matched for these factors, thermal ablation for lung and liver metastases appears to provide equivalent overall survival as surgery, in the range of 50% at 5 years. Thermal ablation has limitations that should be respected to optimize patient outcomes and minimize complications including targets that are well-visualized by image guidance, measure <3cm in diameter, and be located at least 3mm distance from prominent vasculature or major bronchi.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine incorporation of image-guided thermal ablation into the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer can provide long survival and even cure.

Lung Metastases: Current Surgical Indications and New Perspectives

Pulmonary metastasectomy is an established treatment that can provide improved long- term survival for patients with metastatic tumor(s) in the lung. In this mini-review, we discuss the state of the art of thoracic surgery in surgical management of lung metastases which actually occurs for a large part of surgical activity in thoracic surgery department. We describe the principles of surgical therapy that have been defined across the time, and that should remain the milestones of lung metastases treatment: a radical surgery and an adequate lymphadenectomy. We then focus on current surgical indications and report the oncological results according to the surgical approach (open vs. mini-invasive), the histological type and number of lung metastases, and in case of re-metastasectomy. Finally, we conclude with a brief overview about the future perspectives in thoracic surgery in treatment of lung metastases.

Role of resection for extrahepatopulmonary metastases of colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Although surgical resection for liver or lung metastases of colorectal cancer has been widely accepted, the use of this approach for extrahepatopulmonary metastases remains debatable due to the systemic nature of the disease. The aim of this study was to clarify the utility of resection along with perioperative chemotherapy for patients with extrahepatopulmonary metastases of colon cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-arm study at a single institution. Forty-two patients with resectable extrahepatopulmonary metastases who underwent metastasectomy with curative intent between 2009 and 2018 at Nagoya University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes measured were overall and relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

The most common metastatic site was the peritoneum (n = 31), followed by the distant lymph nodes (n = 10), ovary (n = 1) and spleen (n = 1), with overlaps. Preoperative and postoperative chemotherapies were administered to 22 and 8 patients, respectively; the remaining 14 patients received surgery alone. R0 resection was achieved in 36 patients (85.7%). The 5-year overall survival and 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 58.6% and 33.8%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, R1 resection was associated with a poor relapse-free survival rate (P = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, the absence of perioperative chemotherapy was an independent risk factor for poor overall survival rates (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection benefited selected patients with extrahepatopulmonary metastases with favorable long-term survival outcomes. Surgery alone without systemic chemotherapy is likely to bring poor outcome; therefore, preoperative induction might be promising to keep up with chemotherapy.

Is Surgical Treatment Effective or Contraindicated in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Exhibiting Extrahepatic Metastasis?

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection for patients with hepatic and extrahepatic colorectal metastases remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of curative resection of distant extrahepatic metastatic lesions in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

From 2007 to 2019, 377 patients with CRLM were treated; of these, 323 patients underwent hepatectomy, and 54 patients with extrahepatic metastases (EHM) had received only chemotherapy. Survival and recurrence were compared between patients with and without EHM. Variables potentially associated with survival were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Among patients who underwent hepatectomy, the median, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates for patients with EHM (n = 60) were 32 months, 47%, and 28%, respectively, while those for patients without EHM (n = 263) were 115 months, 79%, and 66%, respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, outcomes were similar in R2 patients with EHM and those with unresectable tumors. However, outcomes were significantly better in the R0/1 group than in the R2 and unresectable groups (p < 0.001). Among patients with EHM, multivariate analysis revealed that higher clinical risk score, incomplete resection of all EHM, extrahepatic disease detected intraoperatively, and previous treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CRLM with EHM (liver + one organ), gross curative resection is necessary when surgical treatment is contemplated, and resection of liver metastases should be performed in patients with CRLM with smaller and fewer tumors (e.g., H1).

Successful Laparoscopic Treatment of Pancreatic Metastasis From Sigmoid Colon Cancer: A Case Report

Progressive colorectal cancer frequently presents with various manifestations, including hepatic, pulmonary, and peritoneal metastases, as well as local and anastomotic site recurrences. However, pancreatic metastasis is extremely rare. Complete surgical resection is currently considered the most effective and only potentially curative treatment for colorectal cancer with distant metastases. We report the successful laparoscopic treatment of a patient with pancreatic metastasis after initial surgery for Stage IV sigmoid colon cancer with pulmonary metastasis. An 84-year-old man was initially diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer and pulmonary metastasis. Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and thoracoscopic partial resection of the right lung were performed in 2017. After 8 months, an approximately 20-mm tumor was detected in the pancreatic tail during imaging investigations. We performed laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy without lymph node dissection at 1 year after the initial operation. The histopathological findings suggested metachronous pancreatic metastasis from the sigmoid colon cancer. The patient has had an uneventful postoperative course with no signs of recurrent disease during 29 months of follow-up after the pancreatic surgery. After prior surgery for Stage IV sigmoid colon cancer with pulmonary metastasis, curative resection was performed for pancreatic metastasis. We believe that curative resection may be useful for pancreatic tumors that involve hematogenous metastasis.

Role of surgical resection and its alternative local therapy for pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer

We reviewed surgical and alternative treatments for pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer, focusing on recent reports. The standard treatment for pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer is pulmonary resection, if resectable, despite the fact that the metastasis is hematogenous to distant organs. Guidelines in several countries, including Japan, have described pulmonary resection as a useful option because of the favorable long-term prognosis reported in various studies pertaining to pulmonary resection. The indications for pulmonary resection have been reviewed in several studies; additionally, the number of metastases, pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen value, and disease-free interval from the primary resection to pulmonary recurrence have been proposed. However, no consensus has been reached to date. Contrastingly, recent advances in chemotherapy have remarkably improved the outcome of distant metastases, indicating that it is time to reconsider the significance of local treatment, including pulmonary resection. In addition to surgical resection, minimally invasive therapies, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy and radiofrequency ablation have been developed as local treatments for pulmonary metastases, and their long-term results have been reported. Prospective controlled trials and large-scale data analyses are needed to determine the best local treatment for pulmonary metastases and to find the appropriate indication for each treatment.

Pulmonary metastasectomy with lymphadenectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Routine lymphadenectomy during metastasectomy for pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer has been recommended by several recent expert consensus meetings. However, evidence supporting lymphadenectomy is limited. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the impact of simultaneous lymph node metastases on patient survival during metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases (CRPM).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines of studies on lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM. Articles published between 2000 and 2020 were identified from Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library without language restriction. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability of included studies. Survival rates were assessed and compared for the presence and level of nodal involvement.

RESULTS

Following review of 8054 studies by paper and abstract, 27 studies comprising 3619 patients were included in the analysis. All patients included in these studies underwent lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM. A total of 690 patients (19.1%) had simultaneous lymph node metastases. Five-year overall survival for patients with and without lymph node metastases was 18.2% and 51.3%, respectively (p < .001). Median survival for patients with lymph node metastases was 27.9 months compared to 58.9 months in patients without lymph node metastases (p < .001). Five-year overall survival for patients with N1 and N2 lymph node metastases was 40.7% and 10.9%, respectively (p = .064).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous lymph node metastases of CRPM have a detrimental impact on survival and this is most apparent for mediastinal lymph node metastases. Therefore, lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM can be advised to obtain important prognostic value.

Thoracoscopic pulmonary metastasectomy in metastatic colorectal cancer: Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to confirm the effectiveness of thoracoscopic metastasectomy for colorectal cancer (CRC) and determine its prognostic factors.

METHODS

Of the 181 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary metastases from CRC between 2011 and 2017, 173 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, long-term survival, and the factors affecting the prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients in the study were predominantly male (n = 104, 60.1%), and the median age was 65 years (range, 25-83 years). The median follow-up time was 46 months (range, 0-114 months). The surgical procedures were 156 wedge resections, five segmentectomies, and 12 lobectomies. Conversion to thoracotomy was required in nine patients. The postoperative complication rate was 2.9%, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.2%. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 94.8%, 70.6%, and 51.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the prognostic factors for survival were age (p = 0.027), pathological stage of CRC (p = 0.019), prior extrathoracic metastasis (p = 0.005), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level (p = 0.020), number of pulmonary metastases (p = 0.011), and disease-free interval (p = 0.026). In the multivariate analysis, two factors were related to prognosis: age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.881; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.189-2.976; p = 0.007) and prior extrathoracic metastasis (HR, 2.170; 95% CI; 1.269-3.711; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

VATS for pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC can be performed relatively safely, and our results regarding long-term survival are comparable with those of other studies. In this study, older age (≥70 years) and prior extrathoracic metastasis were independent prognostic factors of poor prognosis.

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer

The most effective treatment for pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) is complete resection. However, as the recurrence rate after resection of the pulmonary metastases from CRC is high, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is often performed in clinical practice. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC. The medical records of 16 patients who underwent the first complete resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC were retrospectively reviewed. A total of eight patients were treated with single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis, and oral fluoropyrimidines were selected in all regimens. As a result, the relapse-free survival rate after resection of pulmonary metastasis in the group that received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly improved in comparison with the group treated with surgery alone. In the subgroup analysis, patients who benefited from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in some high-risk groups were selected, including patients with a high tumor stage or poor immunological status. In conclusion, single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC was effective for reducing the risk of recurrence and was safe to administer. In addition, certain risk factors may identify patients who would receive more benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC.

Prognostic Significance of the Immunological Indices in Patients Who Underwent Complete Resection of Pulmonary Metastases of Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been reported as immunological prognostic factors for various cancers. We evaluated the association between the prognosis and the immunological status in patients who underwent complete resection of pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated the associations between the NLR before the resection of pulmonary metastases and the relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS), or between the density of TILs in the pulmonary metastasis and the RFS or OS.

RESULTS

The RFS and OS were significantly worse in the NLR-High group than in the NLR-Low group. The RFS was significantly longer in the CD3⁺TILs-High group than in the CD3⁺TILs-Low group.

CONCLUSION

The NLR and the density of TILs may have prognostic significance in patients who undergo complete resection of pulmonary metastases of CRC.

The Assessment of Prognostic Factors for Lung Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Previously Resected Liver Metastases

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic factors of lung metastasectomy in patients with previously resected liver metastases. Thirty-three patients underwent complete resection of lung metastases after previous liver metastasectomy from colorectal cancer between January 2004 and December 2013. In univariate analyses, all cumulative survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in variables were evaluated using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The 5-year survival rate of all 33 patients after lung metastasectomy was 31%. Univariate analysis identified 2 significant prognostic factors: preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (P = 0.035) and maximum tumor size (P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis with a combination of these 2 independent prognostic factors revealed 2-year survival rates of 100%, 92.3%, and 0% for patients with 0, 1, and 2 risk factors, respectively. We identified 2 independent poor prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with previously resected liver metastases: high serum carcinoembryonic antigen level before lung metastasectomy, and maximum size of lung metastases. When these 2 factors are combined, higher- and lower-risk subgroups can be identified, which may help select patients with previously resected liver metastases who benefit most from lung metastasectomy.

Prospective evaluation of watchful waiting for early-stage lung cancer with ground-glass opacity: a single-arm confirmatory multicenter study: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1906 (EVERGREEN study)

Among early-stage lung cancers that show ground-glass nodules on chest computed tomography, the lung cancer surgical study group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group previously reported that nodules of ≤2 cm with a consolidation/tumor ratio of ≤0.25 were considered radiologically non-invasive cancers with a low risk of metastasis. However, there is no consensus based on high-quality evidence about the optimal timing of surgical intervention for radiologically non-invasive cancers. In June 2020, we launched a multi-institutional, single-arm confirmatory trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of watchful waiting for patients with radiologically non-invasive lung cancer. It is planned that a total of 720 patients will be enrolled from 49 institutes over a 5-year period. The primary endpoint is 10-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints are 5-year OS, operation-free survival, proportion of extensive lung resection, proportion of unresectable progression, lung cancer-specific survival and adverse events.

Limited Liver or Lung Colorectal Cancer Metastases. Systemic Treatment, Surgery, Ablation or SBRT

The prognosis for oligometastatic colorectal cancer has improved in recent years, mostly because of recent advances in new techniques and approaches to the treatment of oligometastases, including new surgical procedures, better systemic treatments, percutaneous ablation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). There are several factors to consider when deciding on the better approach for each patient: tumor factors (metachronous or synchronous metastases, RAS mutation, BRAF mutation, disease-free interval, size and number of metastases), patient factors (age, frailty, comorbidities, patient preferences), and physicians' factors (local expertise). These advances have presented major challenges and opportunities for oncologic multidisciplinary teams to treat patients with limited liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer with a curative intention. In this review, we describe the different treatment options in patients with limited liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer, and the possible combination of three approaches: systemic treatment, surgery, and local ablative treatments.

Systematic Review of Treatments for Colorectal Metastases in Elderly Patients to Guide Surveillance Cessation Following Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

Although included in surveillance programmes for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases, elderly patients are susceptible to declines in health and quality of life that may render them unsuitable for further surveillance. Deciding when to cease surveillance is challenging.

METHODS

There are no publications focused on surveillance of elderly patients for CRC metastases. A systematic review of studies reporting treatment outcomes for CRC metastases in elderly patients was performed to assess the risk-benefit balance of the key objectives of surveillance; detecting and treating CRC metastases.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight eligible studies reported outcomes for surgery and chemotherapy in the elderly. Liver resections and use of chemotherapy, including biologics, are more conservative and have poorer outcomes in the elderly compared with younger patients. Selected studies demonstrated poorer quality-of-life (QoL) following surgery and chemotherapy. Studies of ablation in elderly patients are limited.

DISCUSSION

The survival benefit of treating CRC metastases with surgery or chemotherapy decreases with advancing age and QoL may decline in the elderly. The relatively lower efficacy and detrimental QoL impact of multimodal therapy options for detected CRC metastases in the elderly questions the benefit of surveillance in some elderly patients. Care of elderly patients should thus be customized based on their preference, formal geriatric assessment, natural life-expectancy, and the perceived risk-benefit balance of treating recurrent CRC metastases. Clinicians may consider surveillance cessation in patients aged 75 years and above if geriatric assessment is unsatisfactory, patients decline surveillance, or patient fitness deteriorates catastrophically.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal carcinoma

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It is estimated that 50% of all patients with CRC develop metastases, most commonly in the liver and the lung. Lung metastases are seen in approximately 10–15% of all patients with CRC. A large number of these patients with metastatic CRC can only receive palliative treatment due to invasion of other organs and disseminated disease. However, a subset of these patients present with potentially resectable metastases. Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered to be a potentially curative treatment for selected patients with resectable metastatic CRC. Current data suggest that patients that undergo pulmonary metastasectomy have 5-year survival rates of approximately 40%. However, the majority of data published regarding lung metastasectomy is based on small, retrospective case series. Due to this lack of prospective data, it is still unclear which subset of patients will benefit most from curative-intent surgery. Furthermore, there is also controversy regarding which prognostic and genetic factors are related to survival outcomes and whether there is a difference between open and thoracoscopic approaches in terms of overall and disease-free survival. In this review, we aim to summarize the latest data on prognostic factors and survival outcomes after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with metastatic CRC.

Preoperative evaluation and indications for pulmonary metastasectomy

Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is an established treatment that can provide improved long-term survival for patients with metastatic tumor(s) in the lung. In the current era, where treatment options other than PM such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), immunotherapy, and molecular-targeted therapy are available, thoracic surgeons should review the approach to the preoperative evaluation and the indications. Preoperative evaluation consists of history and physical examinations, physiological tests, and radiological examinations. Radiological examinations serve to identify the differential diagnosis of the pulmonary nodules, evaluate their precise number, location, and features, and search for extra thoracic metastases. The indication of PM should be considered from both physiological and oncological points of view. The general criteria for PM are as follows; (I) the patient has a good general condition, (II) the primary malignancy is controlled, (III) there is no other extrapulmonary metastases, and (IV) the pulmonary lesion(s) are thought to be completely resectable. In addition to the general eligibility criteria of PM, prognostic factors of each tumor type should be considered when deciding the indication for PM. When patients have multiple poor prognostic factors and/or a short disease-free interval (DFI), thoracic surgeons should not hesitate to observe the patient for a certain period before deciding on the indication for PM. A multidisciplinary discussion is needed in order to decide the indication for PM.

Role of Thermal Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Lung Metastases

Simple Summary

For a long time, surgery has been the only local treatment for pulmonary metastases. Percutaneous thermal ablation appeared in the early 2000s as a minimally invasive alternative technique to surgery for patients who were not eligible for surgery or wanted to preserve quality of life. In this review, we discuss the role of thermal ablation in the management of lung metastases of colorectal cancer, and present the main results of the literature concerning oncological outcomes (local tumor control, survival) based on 12 relevant original studies each involving a minimum of 50 patients, with a minimal follow-up of 12 months.

Abstract

Background: Consensus guidelines of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (2016) provided recommendations for the management of lung metastases. Thermal ablation appears as a tool in the management of these secondary pulmonary lesions, in the same manner as surgical resection or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Methods: Indications, technical considerations, oncological outcomes such as survival (OS) or local control (LC), prognostic factors and complications of thermal ablation in colorectal cancer lung metastases were reviewed and put into perspective with results of surgery and SABR. Results: LC rates varied from 62 to 91%, with size of the metastasis (<2 cm), proximity to the bronchi or vessels, and size of ablation margins (>5 mm) as predictive factors of LC. Median OS varied between 33 and 68 months. Pulmonary free disease interval <12 months, positive carcinoembryonic antigen, absence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and uncontrolled extra-pulmonary metastases were poor prognostic factors for OS. While chest drainage for less than 48 h was required in 13 to 47% of treatments, major complications were rare. Conclusions: Thermal ablation of a selected subpopulation of patients with colorectal cancer lung metastases is safe and can provide excellent LC and delay systemic chemotherapy.

Clinical significance of RBM3 expression in surgically treated colorectal lung metastases and paired primary tumors

BACKGROUND

The lungs are the second most common site of metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to investigate prognostic factors, including RNA-binding motif protein 3 (RBM3) expression, in patients with CRC treated with pulmonary metastasectomy (PM).

METHODS

The cohort included all patients treated with PM at Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden, from 2000 to 2014. Clinicopathological, treatment, and survival data were collected. Immunohistochemical staining of RBM3 was evaluated on tissue microarrays with samples from all lung metastases and a subset of paired primary tumors. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were applied to examine the associations of investigative factors with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

In total, 216 patients with a primary tumor in the rectum (57%), left colon (34%), or right colon (9%) underwent PM. The 5-year OS rate was 56%. Age > 60 years, more than one metastasis, size of metastasis > 3 cm, disease-free interval < 24 months, low RBM3 score in the lung metastasis, and no adjuvant chemotherapy following PM were prognostic factors for shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Several prognostic factors, including RBM3 expression, may be of aid in selecting CRC patients with lung metastases for PM as well as adjuvant therapy.

Risk factors for local tumor progression after RFA of pulmonary metastases: a matched case-control study

OBJECTIVES

Curative treatment of oligometastatic pulmonary disease aims at eradication of all metastases. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been shown to be an efficient method and the frequency of local tumor progression (LTP) should be minimized. The objective of this study was to determine the morphological and treatment-related risk factors for LTP after RFA of pulmonary metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients treated with RFA for pulmonary metastases from 2002 to 2014 were reviewed. All LTPs from 2011 to 2014 were individually matched on the basis of tumor size, number, and histology. In total, 48 LTPs and 112 controls were blindly analyzed for morphological factors including vicinity of bronchus and vessels as well as treatment-related factors such as the size of the ablation zone and ablation margins.

RESULTS

In the simple regression analysis, the significant predictive variables were ≤ 5-mm distance to a large bronchus (OR = 4.94; p = 0.0095) or large vessel (OR = 7.09; p < 0.001), minimal ablation margin (≤ 5 mm (OR = 42.67; p < 0.001), and a central-peripheral ablation offset/ablation zone size > 0.36 (OR = 13.83; p = 0.013). In the multiple regression model, only a minimal ablation margin ≤ 5 mm remained a significant risk factor for LTP.

CONCLUSION

Only the minimal ablation margin remains significant in the multiple regression analysis; the other factors are presumably surrogates of an insufficient ablation margin. Improvement of lung RFA outcomes can probably be obtained by immediate post RFA evaluation of ablation margins to ensure a minimal ablation margin of at least 5 mm.

KEY POINTS

• A distance < 5 mm to a bronchus or vessel of over 3 mm diameter is associated with insufficient ablation margin and thus risk factors for local tumor progression after pulmonary radiofrequency ablation. • A minimal ablation margin of > 5 mm after pulmonary RFA is associated with significantly less local tumor progression and should be looked for at the end of treatment session before needle removal in order to decrease local tumor progression. • Tumor location, pleural contact, occurrence of intra-alveolar hemorrhage, pulmonary atelectasis, and pneumothorax are not associated with an increased risk of local tumor progression.

Prognostic significance of enlarged paraaortic lymph nodes detected during left-sided colorectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Background

Very few studies have been conducted on the treatment strategy for enlarged paraaortic lymph nodes (PALNs) incidentally detected during surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefit of lymph node dissection in patients with incidentally detected enlarged PALNs.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with left colon and rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection with PALN dissection between January 2010 and December 2018. The predictive factors for pathologic PALN metastasis (PALNM) were analyzed, and survival analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors.

Results

Among 263 patients included, 19 (7.2%) showed pathologic PALNM and 5 (26.33%) had enlarged PALNs incidentally detected during surgery. These 5 patients accounted for 2.2% of 227 patients who had no evidence of PALNM on preoperative radiologic examination. Radiologic PALNM (odds ratio [OR] 12.737, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.472–46.723) and radiologic distant metastasis other than PALNM (OR = 4.090, 95% CI 1.011–16.539) were independent predictive factors for pathologic PALNM. Pathologic T4 stage (hazard ratio [HR] 2.196, 95% CI 1.063–4.538) and R2 resection (HR 4.643, 95% CI 2.046–10.534) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). In patients undergoing R0 resection, pathologic PALNM was not associated with 5-year OS (90% vs. 82.2%, p = 0.896).

Conclusion

Dissection of enlarged PALNs incidentally detected during colorectal surgery may benefit patients with favorable survival outcomes.

Prognostic factors in pulmonary metastasectomy and efficacy of repeat pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer

Background

The rate of pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased with recent advances in chemotherapy, diagnostic techniques, and surgical procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic factors for response to pulmonary metastasectomy and the efficacy of repeat pulmonary metastasectomy.

Methods

This study was a retrospective, single-institution study of 126 CRC patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy between 2000 and 2019 at the Gifu University Hospital.

Results

The 3- and 5-year survival rates were 84.9% and 60.8%, respectively. Among the 126 patients, 26 (20.6%) underwent a second pulmonary metastasectomy for pulmonary recurrence after initial pulmonary metastasectomy. Univariate analysis of survival identified seven significant factors: (1) gender (p = 0.04), (2) past history of extra-thoracic metastasis (p = 0.04), (3) maximum tumor size (p = 0.002), (4) mediastinal lymph node metastasis (p = 0.02), (5) preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p = 0.01), (6) preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level (p = 0.03), and (7) repeat pulmonary metastasectomy for pulmonary recurrence (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only mediastinal lymph node metastasis (p = 0.02, risk ratio 8.206, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.566–34.962) and repeat pulmonary metastasectomy for pulmonary recurrence (p < 0.001, risk ratio 0.054, 95% CI 0.010–0.202) were significant. Furthermore, in the evaluation of surgical outcomes, the safety of second pulmonary metastasectomy was almost the same as that of initial pulmonary metastasectomy.

Conclusions

Repeat pulmonary metastasectomy is likely to be safe and effective for recurrent cases that meet the surgical criteria. However, mediastinal lymph node metastasis was a significant independent prognostic factor for worse overall survival.

Therapeutic Concepts for Oligometastatic Gastrointestinal Tumours

Background

Clinical trials have proven a survival benefit from applying local therapies for oligometastatic cancers of various origin.

Summary

Today, the definition of oligometa-static disease is based on limited lesion numbers and organ systems involved. Treatment guidelines by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and several other groups suggest a threshold of up to 5 tumours. Established biological markers indicating the aggressiveness of a given tumour (and therefore suggesting local treatment only or the addition of or complete switch to systemic therapies) are missing, except for disease-free survival, the only recommended parameter for patient selection beyond lesion count.

Key Message

The following article discusses clinical implications as well as local techniques established for the treatment of oligometastatic disease.

Prognostic significance of spread through air spaces in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer could provide long-term survival in selected patients, and it is commonly performed in practice. However, surgical margin relapse sometimes occurs and is a problematic issue to resolve. Spread through air spaces (STAS) is one of the invasion forms in primary lung cancer and is associated with local recurrence and a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of STAS for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer and to assess the predictability of STAS with preoperative clinical information.

METHODS

A total of 96 pulmonary metastatic lesions from colorectal cancer in 37 patients who underwent metastasectomy at our institution from January 2008 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

STAS was identified in 41.6 % of the 96 lesions. Surgical margin relapse was found in 8 lesions (8.3 %) from 7 patients (18.9 %). The distance of STAS was identified as an independent risk factor for surgical margin relapse on multivariable analysis (p =  0.033). The patients with STAS showed significantly worse overall survival than those without (5-year overall survival rate: 30.3 % vs. 76.9 %; p =  0.002). On multivariable analysis, patients with STAS had a significantly higher risk of death than those without (p =  0.019). An elevated pre-metastasectomy serum carcinoembryonic antigen level was independently correlated with STAS on multivariable analysis (p =  0.049).

CONCLUSION

STAS was related to a poor prognosis and surgical margin relapse in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer.

Past, present, and future perspectives of pulmonary metastasectomy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Over a half-century has passed since Thomford et al. proposed the selection criteria for pulmonary metastasectomy, and several prognostic factors have been identified. Although screening modalities and operations have changed dramatically, the important concepts of the selection criteria remain unchanged. Recent improvements in the survival outcomes of colorectal cancer patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy may be the result of strict adherence to the selection criteria for oligometastatic lung tumors, which can mimic local disease. Pulmonary metastasectomy has become an important option for selected patients with oligometastasis, based mainly on a large amount of retrospective data, but its effect on survival remains unclear. Curable pulmonary metastasis might be regarded as a "semi-local disease" under the spontaneous control of an acquired alteration in host immune status. The current practice of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer focuses on selecting the most appropriate operation for selected patients. However, in the rapidly evolving era of immunotherapy, treatment-naïve patients for whom surgery is not suitable might be pre-conditioned by immunotherapy so that they may be considered for salvage surgery.

The treatment strategy of R0 resection in colorectal cancer with synchronous para-aortic lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

Synchronous metastatic para-aortic lymph node (mPALN) dissectionin colorectal cancer has relatively good oncological outcomes, though many patients develop recurrence. Universal prognostic factor remain unclear and no definitive perioperative chemotherapy is available, making the treatment of mPALN controversial. In the present study, we aimed to establish a treatment strategy for synchronous mPALN.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 20 patients with pathological mPALN below the renal vein who underwent R0 resection. Long-term outcomes, recurrence type, and prognostic factors for survival were investigated.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 39% and 25%, respectively. Seventeen patients (85%) developed recurrence, including 13 (76%) within 1 year after surgery, and ~ 70% of all recurrences were multiple recurrences. Four patients (20%) survived > 5 years. Pathological T stage (p= 0.011), time to recurrence (p = 0.007), and recurrence resection (p = 0.009) were identified as prognostic factors for long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

R0 resection of synchronous mPALN in colorectal cancer resulted in acceptable oncological outcomes, though we found a high rate of early unresectable recurrence. If the recurrence occurs late or isolated, surgical resection should be considered for longer survival.

Long-Term Outcomes in Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Histologically Proven Colorectal Lung Metastasis

Introduction

To evaluate the long-term outcome of image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) when treating histologically confirmed colorectal lung metastasis in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and local tumour control (LTC).

Materials and Methods

Retrospective single-centre study. Consecutive RFA treatments of histologically proven lung colorectal metastases between 01/01/2008 and 31/12/14. The primary outcome was patient survival (OS and PFS). Secondary outcomes were local tumour progression (LTP) and complications. Prognostic factors associated with OS/ PFS were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Sixty patients (39 males: 21 females; median age 69 years) and 125 colorectal lung metastases were treated. Eighty percent (n = 48) also underwent lung surgery for lung metastases. Mean metastasis size (cm) was 1.4 ± 0.6 (range 0.3–4.0). Median number of RFA sessions was 1 (1–4). During follow-up (median 45.5 months), 45 patients died (75%). The estimated OS and PFS survival rates at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 years were 96.7%, 74.7%, 44.1%, 27.5%, 16.3% (median OS, 52 months) and 66.7%, 31.2%, 25.9%, 21.2% and 5.9% (median PFS, 19 months). The LTC rate was 90% with 6 patients developing LTP with 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year LTP rates of 3.3%, 8.3%, 10.0% and 10.0%. Progression-free interval < 1 year (P = 0.002, HR = 0.375) and total number of pulmonary metastases (≥ 3) treated (P = 0.037, HR = 0.480) were independent negative prognostic factors. Thirty-day mortality rate was 0% with no intra-procedural deaths.

Conclusion

The long-term OS and PFS following RFA for the treatment of histologically confirmed colorectal lung metastases demonstrate comparable oncological durability to surgery.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00270-020-02623-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pulmonary resection for metachronous metastatic gastric cancer diagnosed using multi-detector computed tomography: Report of five cases

•

The standard treatment for metastatic gastric cancer is systemic chemotherapy.

•

Pulmonary resection for metastatic gastric cancer has been rarely reported on.

•

Five patients with metastatic gastric cancer diagnosed using MDCT underwent surgery.

•

We demonstrated remarkably better survival values compared to previous reports.

•

Pulmonary resection may be treatment option for select patients.

Introduction

As pulmonary resection for metastatic gastric cancer has been rarely reported on, the role of metastasectomy remains unclear in such settings. We reviewed the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients with metachronous pulmonary metastasis from gastric cancer (MPMGC) diagnosed using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) who underwent pulmonary resection.

Presentation of case

From September 2002 to May 2018, five patients underwent pulmonary resection for MPMGC at Shizuoka Cancer Center. All patients received curative resection for initial gastric cancer. Three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median age at pulmonary resection was 70 years. The median disease-free interval between initial gastrectomy and MPMGC diagnosis was 41 months. The first site of recurrence was the lung in all patients. All patients were diagnosed as having primary lung cancer using MDCT before pulmonary resection and fit the surgical indication for primary lung cancer. Lobectomy was performed in three patients, while wedge resection was performed in two. The median overall survival following pulmonary resection was 79 (range, 18–89) months. Two patients experienced recurrence. While one showed recurrence in the mediastinal lymph node, in the other it was observed in the remnant lung; the latter underwent repeated pulmonary resection followed by systemic chemotherapy. Four patients survived for longer than 4 years after pulmonary resection.

Conclusions

Of the five patients with MPMGC diagnosed using MDCT who underwent pulmonary resection, long-term survival was achieved after pulmonary resection in four. Thus, pulmonary resection may be considered for those diagnosed with lung nodules after surgery for gastric cancer, and who fit the surgical indication for primary lung cancer.

Prognosis and risk factors for the development of pulmonary metastases after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical resection in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Background

Although preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is currently considered effective for treating locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a proportion of patients develop postoperative pulmonary metastases. The current study aimed to assess the prognostic characteristics and risk factors for the development of rectal cancer pulmonary metastases after CRT and radical resection.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data collected on 544 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with LARC and underwent preoperative CRT followed by tumor radical resection between December 2003 and June 2014. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and pulmonary metastasis rates were calculated and compared among the subgroups, and risk factors for pulmonary metastases were identified by Cox models.

Results

A total of 61 (11.2%) patients developed pulmonary metastases postoperatively, 45 of whom (73.8%) developed the condition in the first 24 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year pulmonary metastasis rates were 6.7%, 10.4%, and 11.7%, respectively. Compared with the disease-free group, the pulmonary metastases group had a significantly lower proportion of downstaging and pathological complete regression (pCR) rate and a significantly higher proportion of low rectum tumor. In multivariate analysis, a distance of the tumor ≤5 cm from the anal verge [hazard ratio (HR), 1.394; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.211-3.736; P=0.003] was identified as an independent negative predictor of the 3-year pulmonary metastasis rate, and N0 stage (HR, 0.490; 95% CI, 0.261-0.919; P=0.026) and TNM downstaging (HR, 0.514; 95% CI, 0.265-0.997; P=0.049) were identified as independent positive predictors of the 3-year pulmonary metastasis rate.

Conclusions

Pulmonary metastases warranted a more intensive follow-up in patients with low rectal cancer, lymph node metastases and poor response after preoperative CRT and radical tumor resection.

Optimal timing for the resection of pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal cancer

This study aims to clarify the surgical treatment time of pulmonary metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer.Early relapse after resection of pulmonary metastasis is often encountered when the interval from the detection of pulmonary metastasis to pulmonary metastasectomy was short.In this retrospective analysis, data of patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical treatment of pulmonary metastasis at the Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Gunma, from April 2001 through September 2018 were evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups. We examined the interval period from the diagnosis of pulmonary metastasis to pulmonary metastasectomy. This period was divided into every 3 months, and the prognosis of each group was compared with clarify the appropriate timing of pulmonary metastasectomy.The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates.The most significant difference was observed when the cutoff value was 9 months (5-year recurrence-free survival 45.8% vs 85.6%, P < .01). No significant difference was found in any background factors between the 2 groups. Twenty-five patients (34.7%) experienced recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy. The most common site of recurrence was the lung (48%). Among the 12 cases of recurrence of pulmonary metastasis, 11 cases belonged to the <9 months group. A multivariable survival analysis found that the interval period of <9 months was a significant predictor of recurrence.Our study suggests that clinical follow-up for 9 months prior pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal patients would improve the prognosis.

Incidence and prognosis of pulmonary metastasis in colorectal cancer: a population-based study

PURPOSE

It is unclear how primary tumor location affects the pulmonary metastasis in colorectal cancer patients with different primary tumor locations. We aim to explore the relationship between primary tumor location and the incidence and prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with pulmonary metastasis at diagnosis.

METHODS

From Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 9920 out of 192,969 CRC patients were identified with pulmonary metastasis at diagnosis between 2010 and 2015. Patients were classified into three subsets according to primary tumor location. The incidence of pulmonary metastasis and median survival were calculated. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression were performed to identify the risk factors of pulmonary metastasis and prognosis.

RESULTS

The incidence of pulmonary metastasis was 5.14% in the entire colorectal cancer cohort and 25.66% in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. The median survival of those patients was 10 months. Rectal cancer patients exhibited the highest incidence of pulmonary metastasis, while they had the longest median survival (15 months). The right-sided colon cancer patients had the lowest incidence of pulmonary metastasis, but the shortest median survival (8 months). 61 to 80 years old, over 80, black, two or three extrapulmonary metastatic sites and CEA-positive had a negative influence both on the incidence and prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The importance of primary tumor location in affecting the incidence of pulmonary metastasis and prognosis of colorectal cancer patients was highlighted in this study. Primary tumor location should be considered in clinical interference and personalized treatment for colorectal cancer patients with pulmonary metastasis.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: Prognosis analysis disaggregated by the origin of the primary tumor

BACKGROUND

The metastatic pattern differs between colon cancer and rectal cancer because of the distinct venous drainage systems. It is unclear whether colon cancer and rectal cancer are associated with different prognostic factors based on the anatomic difference.

METHODS

We assessed the prognostic factors and survival outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy (PM), disaggregated by the location of primary colorectal cancer. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify variables that influenced the outcomes of pulmonary metastasectomy.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2017, 179 patients underwent PM classified into colon cancer and rectal cancer groups based on the site of origin of metastasis. The median postoperative follow-up was 2.3 years (range, 0.1-10.6). The post-PM 5-year survival rate in the colon cancer and rectal cancer groups was 42.5% and 39.9%, respectively (p = 0.310). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, presence of previous liver metastasis [hazard ratio (HR), 2.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-4.51; p = 0.013], numbers of tumors (≥2; HR, 6.56; 95% CI, 2.07-20.79; p = 0.001), and abnormal preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.34-4.64; p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors in patients with metastatic rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic correlates of post-PM survival differ between colon and rectal cancer. Rectal cancer patients have worse prognosis if they have a history of liver metastasis, multiple pulmonary metastases, or abnormal preoperative CEA. These results may help assess the survival benefit of PM and facilitate treatment decision-making.

Three-year Survival Rate after Radiofrequency Ablation for Surgically Resectable Colorectal Lung Metastases: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Background Although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is widely performed for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) lung metastases, its efficacy for candidates with surgically resectable disease is unclear. Purpose To evaluate the prognosis after RFA in participants with resectable CRC lung metastases. Materials and Methods For this prospective multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00776399), participants with five or fewer surgically resectable lung metastases measuring 3 cm or less were included. Participants with CRC and a total of 100 lung metastases measuring 0.4-2.8 cm (mean, 1.0 cm ± 0.5) were chosen and treated with 88 sessions of RFA from January 2008 to April 2014. The primary end point was the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, with an expected rate of 55%. The local tumor progression rate and safety were evaluated as secondary end points. The OS rates were generated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors by means of univariable and multivariable analyses. Adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Results Seventy participants with CRC (mean age, 66 years ± 10; 49 men) were evaluated. The 3-year OS rate was 84% (59 of 70 participants; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 76%, 93%). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse OS included rectal rather than colon location (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.7; 95% CI: 2.6, 22.6; P < .001), positive carcinoembryonic antigen (HR = 5.8; 95% CI: 2.0, 16.9; P = .001), and absence of previous chemotherapy (HR = 9.8; 95% CI: 2.5, 38.0; P < .001). Local tumor progression was found in six of the 70 participants (9%). A grade 5 adverse event was seen in one of the 88 RFA sessions (1%), and grade 2 adverse events were seen in 18 (20%). Conclusion Lung radiofrequency ablation provided a favorable 3-year overall survival rate of 84% for resectable colorectal lung metastases measuring 3 cm or smaller. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Gemmete in this issue.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer

The number of deaths from colorectal cancer in Japan continues to increase. Colorectal cancer deaths exceeded 50,000 in 2016. In the 2019 edition, revision of all aspects of treatments was performed, with corrections and additions made based on knowledge acquired since the 2016 version (drug therapy) and the 2014 version (other treatments). The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer (JSCCR guidelines 2019) have been prepared to show standard treatment strategies for colorectal cancer, to eliminate disparities among institutions in terms of treatment, to eliminate unnecessary treatment and insufficient treatment and to deepen mutual understanding between healthcare professionals and patients by making these guidelines available to the general public. These guidelines have been prepared by consensuses reached by the JSCCR Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved by literature searches and in view of the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Therefore, these guidelines can be used as a tool for treating colorectal cancer in actual clinical practice settings. More specifically, they can be used as a guide to obtaining informed consent from patients and choosing the method of treatment for each patient. Controversial issues were selected as clinical questions, and recommendations were made. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of the evidence and a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here, we present the English version of the JSCCR guidelines 2019.