Liver transplantation for neuroendocrine tumors in Europe-results and trends in patient selection: A 213-case European liver transplant registry study. Ann Surg. 2013;257:807-815. [PMID: 23532105 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e31828ee17c]

Liver transplantation for primary and secondary liver tumors: Patient-level meta-analyses compared to UNOS conventional indications

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver transplant (LT) for transplant oncology (TO) indications is being slowly adopted worldwide and has been recommended to be incorporated cautiously due to concerns about mid-long-term survival and its impact on the waiting list.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We conducted 4 systematic reviews of all series on TO indications (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma [phCC]) and liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and colorectal cancer (CRLM) and compared them using patient-level meta-analyses to data obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database considering conventional daily-practice indications. Secondary analyses were done for specific selection criteria (Mayo-like protocols for phCC, SECA-2 for CRLM, and Milan criteria for NET). A total of 112,014 LT were analyzed from 2005 to 2020 from the UNOS databases and compared with 345, 721, 494, and 103 patients obtained from meta-analyses on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and phCC, and liver metastases from NET and CRLM, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 53.3%, 56.4%, 68.6%, and 53.8%, respectively. In Mantel-Cox one-to-one comparisons, survival of TO indications was superior to combined LT, second, and third LT and not statistically significantly different from LT in recipients >70 years and high BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation for TO indications has adequate 5-year survival rates, mostly when performed under the selection criteria available in the literature (Mayo-like protocols for phCC, SECA-2 for CRLM, and Milan for NET). Despite concerns about its impact on the waiting list, some other LT indications are being performed with lower survival rates. These oncological patients should be given the opportunity to have a definitive curative therapy within validated criteria.

Liver transplantation as a treatment for cancer: comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation for cancer indications has gained momentum in recent years. This review is intended to optimize the care setting of liver transplant candidates by highlighting current indications, technical aspects and barriers with available solutions to facilitate the guidance of available strategies for healthcare professionals in specialized centres.

METHODS

A review of the most recent relevant literature was conducted for all the cancer indications of liver transplantation including colorectal cancer liver metastases, hilar cholangiocarcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic epitheloid haemangioendothelioma.

RESULTS

Transplant benefit from the best available evidence, including SECA I, SECA II, TRANSMET studies for colorectal liver metastases, various preoperative protocols for cholangiocarcinoma patients, standard, extended selection criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumours, are discussed. Innovative approaches to deal with organ shortages, including machine-perfused deceased grafts, living donor liver transplantation and RAPID procedures, are also explored.

CONCLUSION

Cancer indications for liver transplantation are here to stay, and the selection criteria among all cancer groups are likely to evolve further with improved prognostication of tumour biology using adjuncts such as radiomics, cancer genomics, and circulating DNA and RNA status. International prospective registry-based studies could overcome the limitations of smaller patient cohorts and lack of level 1 evidence.

Expanding Indications in Transplant Oncology

Liver transplantation is aptly described as the only curative treatment for cirrhosis and cirrhosis with co-morbid hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its utility in the management of various other primary and secondary liver cancers is gaining traction rapidly, with more thorough assessments on broader populations continuing to emerge. Most prominently, this includes colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and more. Furthermore, despite being a well described treatment for HCC for many years, growing evidence supports a change in oncological strategy for HCC, with broadened selection criteria and more advanced systemic and locoregional therapies available. Our review aims to describe the evidence supporting the expansion of indications and selection criteria for liver transplantation in various oncologic indications of primary and secondary liver tumors.

Surgical Management of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

Patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLMs) may develop carcinoid syndrome, carcinoid heart disease, or other symptoms from overproduction of hormones. Hepatic resection and cytoreduction is the most direct treatment of NETLMs in eligible patients, and cytoreduction improves symptoms, may reduce the sequelae of carcinoid syndrome, and extends survival. Parenchymal-sparing procedures, such as ablation and enucleation, should be considered during cytoreduction to maximize treatment of multifocal tumors while preserving healthy liver tissue. For patients with large hepatic tumor burdens, high-grade disease, or comorbidities precluding surgery, liver-directed and systemic therapies can be used to palliate symptoms and improve progression-free survival.

Liver transplantation for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastasis: optimal patient selection and perioperative management in the era of multimodal treatments

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) often metastasize to the liver. Although curative liver resection provides a favorable prognosis for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM), with a 5-year survival rate of 70-80%, recurrence is almost inevitable, mainly in the remnant liver. In Western countries, liver transplantation (LT) has been performed in patients with NELM, with the objective of complete removal of macro- and micro-NELMs. However, prognosis had been unsatisfactory, with 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates of approximately 50 and 30%, respectively. In 2007, the Milan criteria were proposed as indications for LT for NELM. The criteria included: (1) confirmed histology of NET-G1 or G2; (2) a primary tumor drained by the portal system and all extrahepatic diseases removed with curative resection before LT; (3) liver involvement ≤50%; (4) good response or stable disease for at least 6 months before LT; (5) age ≤ 55 years. A subsequent report demonstrated outstanding LT outcomes for NELM within the Milan criteria, with 5-year overall survival and recurrence rates of 97 and 13%, respectively. In Japan, living donor LT (LDLT) for NELM has been performed sporadically in only 16 patients by 2021 in Japan; however, no consensus has been reached on the indications or perioperative management of LDLT. This article presents the outcomes of these 16 patients who underwent LDLT in Japan and reviews the literature to clarify optimal indications and perioperative management of LDLT for NELM in the era of novel multimodal treatments.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established life-saving procedure. The field of LT has changed in the past 10 years from several perspectives, with the expansion of indications, transplantation of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure, evolution of transplant oncology, the use of donations after cardiac death, new surgical techniques, and prioritisation of recipients on the waiting list. In addition, the advent of organ perfusion machines, the recognition of new forms of rejection, and the attention paid to the transition from paediatric to adult patients, have all improved the management of LT recipients. The purpose of the EASL guidelines presented here is not to cover all aspects of LT but to focus on developments since the previous EASL guidelines published in 2016.

Liver Transplantation for the Cure of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: A Systematic Review with Particular Attention to the Risk Factors of Death and Recurrence

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are heterogeneous entities. Despite considerable advancement in the field, almost 50% of patients have metastatic disease, when liver transplantation (LT) is one of the possible treatments offering a cure in well-selected patients.

METHODS

The present study aims to systematically review all the literature from 2000 onwards on using LT for patients with NEN-LM, with particular attention to the risk factors of death and recurrence.

RESULTS

LT offers 5-year OS ranging from 52 to 74% and 5-year TFS rates ranging from 39 to 62%, with even better results published from 2009 onwards. The main risk factors for patient deaths are related to unfavorable primary tumor pathology, higher liver involvement, and simultaneous LT and primary resection. Similarly, recurrence is higher related to poor tumor grade and differentiation, and in the case of an older recipient age.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying uniform criteria and a more in-depth understanding of the relevant prognostic factors contribute to a better selection of candidates for curative LT due to NEN metastases. LT for unresectable or liver-restricted NENs has a relevant place in the treatment algorithm and has achieved excellent results in recent decades, but more international efforts are needed to further improve outcomes.

Current Management of Neuroendocrine Tumour Liver Metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims to illustrate the current state of investigations and management of liver metastases in patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are rising in incidence globally and have become the second most prevalent gastrointestinal malignancy in UK and USA. Frequently, patients have metastatic disease at time of presentation. The liver is the most common site of metastases for gastro-enteropancreatic NETs. Characterisation of liver metastases with imaging is important to ensure disease is not under-staged.

RECENT FINDINGS

Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography are now becoming standard of care for imaging liver metastases. There is an increasing armamentarium of therapies available for management of NETs and loco-regional therapy for liver metastases. The data supporting surgical and loco-regional therapy is reviewed with focus on role of liver transplantation. It is important to use appropriate imaging and classification of NET liver metastases. It is key that decisions regarding approach to treatment is undertaken in a multidisciplinary team and that individualised approaches are considered for management of patients with metastatic NETs.

Evolution and current trends in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a major cause of cancer-related death, with a 5-year relative overall survival of up to 20%. The liver is the most common site of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC), with about 50% of CRC patients metastasizing to their liver over the course of their disease. Complete liver resection is the primary modality of treatment for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM), with an overall 5-year survival rate of up to 58%. However, only 15% to 20% of patients with CRLM are deemed suitable for resection at presentation. For unresectable diseases, the median survival of patients remains low even with the best chemotherapy. In recent decades, the management of CRLM has continued to evolve with the expansion of resection criteria, novel targeted systemic therapies, and improved locoregional therapies. However, due to the heterogeneity of the CRC patient population, the optimal evaluation of treatment options for CRLM remains complex. Therefore, effective management requires a multidisciplinary team to help define resectability and devise a personalized treatment approach, from the initial diagnosis to the final treatment.

Surgery for advanced neuroendocrine tumours of the small bowel: recommendations based on a consensus meeting of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES)

BACKGROUND

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The aim of this paper is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding (controversial) topics in the surgical management of advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

METHODS

A working group of experts was formed by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons. The group addressed 11 clinically relevant questions regarding surgery for advanced disease, including the benefit of primary tumour resection, the role of cytoreduction, the extent of lymph node clearance, and the management of an unknown primary tumour. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify papers addressing the research questions. Final recommendations were presented and voted upon by European Society of Endocrine Surgeons members at the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons Conference in Mainz in 2023.

RESULTS

The literature review yielded 1223 papers, of which 84 were included. There were no randomized controlled trials to address any of the research questions and therefore conclusions were based on the available case series, cohort studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses of the available non-randomized studies. The proposed recommendations were scored by 38-51 members and rated 'strongly agree' or 'agree' by 64-96% of participants.

CONCLUSION

This paper provides recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert opinion on the surgical management of locally advanced and metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Liver transplantation as an alternative for the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastasis: Appraisal of the current evidence

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is still in debate. Studies comparing LT with liver resection (LR) for NELM are scarce, as patient selection is heterogeneous and experience is limited. The goal of this review was to provide a critical analysis of the evidence on LT versus LR in the treatment of NELM.

DATA SOURCES

A scoping literature search on LT and LR for NELM was performed with PubMed, including English articles up to March 2023.

RESULTS

International guidelines recommend LR for NELM in resectable, well-differentiated tumors in the absence of extrahepatic metastatic disease with superior results of LR compared to systemic or liver-directed therapies. Advanced liver surgery has extended resectability criteria whilst entailing increased perioperative risk and short disease-free survival. In highly selected patients (based on the Milan criteria) with unresectable NELM, oncologic results of LT are promising. Prognostic factors include tumor biology (G1/G2) and burden, waiting time for LT, patient age and extrahepatic spread. Based on low-level evidence, LT for low-grade NELM within the Milan criteria resulted in improved disease-free survival and overall survival compared to LR. The benefits of LT were lost in patients beyond the Milan NELM-criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

With adherence to strict selection criteria especially tumor biology, LT for NELM is becoming a valuable option providing oncologic benefits compared to LR. Recent evidence suggests even stricter selection criteria with regard to tumor biology.

Liver transplant for primary biliary tract neuroendocrine tumor in a nine-year-old girl

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare epithelial neoplasms that arise most commonly from the gastrointestinal tract. In pediatrics, the most common site of origin is in the appendix, with the liver being the most common site of metastasis. Neuroendocrine tumors arising from the biliary tract are extremely rare.

METHODS

We describe a case of a nine-year-old girl who presented with obstructive cholestasis and was found to have multiple liver masses identified on biopsy as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with an unknown primary tumor site.

RESULT

The patient underwent extensive investigation to identify a primary tumor site, including endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and capsule endoscopy. The patient ultimately underwent definitive management with liver transplant, and on explant was discovered to have multiple well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, WHO Grade 1, with extensive infiltration into the submucosa of bile duct, consistent with primary biliary tract neuroendocrine tumor.

CONCLUSION

Identifying the site of the primary tumor in NETs found within the liver can be challenging. To determine if an extrahepatic primary tumor exists, workup should include endoscopy, EUS, and capsule endoscopy. Children with well-differentiated hepatic NETs, with no identifiable primary tumor, and an unresectable tumor, are considered favorable candidates for liver transplantation.

Evolution of Liver Transplantation Indications: Expanding Horizons

Liver transplantation (LT) has significantly transformed the prognosis of patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The traditional epidemiology of liver diseases has undergone a remarkable shift in indications for LT, marked by a decline in viral hepatitis and an increase in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), along with expanded indications for HCC. Recent advancements in surgical techniques, organ preservation and post-transplant patients' management have opened new possibilities for LT. Conditions that were historically considered absolute contraindications have emerged as potential new indications, demonstrating promising results in terms of patient survival. While these expanding indications provide newfound hope, the ethical dilemma of organ scarcity persists. Addressing this requires careful consideration and international collaboration to ensure equitable access to LT. Multidisciplinary approaches and ongoing research efforts are crucial to navigate the evolving landscape of LT. This review aims to offer a current overview of the primary emerging indications for LT, focusing on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), acute alcoholic hepatitis (AH), intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (i- and p-CCA), colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), and neuroendocrine tumor (NET) liver metastases.

Liver Transplantation for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Approximately half of the patients diagnosed will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Liver resection has a 50% 5-year survival; however, only a fourth of cases are resectable. Unresectable CRLM has poor prognosis despite improved systemic and local ablative treatments. Liver transplantation (LT) has demonstrated a survival benefit in initial prospective clinical trials. Current use of LT for CRLM is limited to several randomized trials and high-performing centers. Improving patient selection criteria and perioperative management, LT will likely become an important part of the multidisciplinary approach to managing the metastatic disease.

Treating rare tumors with liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The success of liver transplantation (LT) in treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has resulted in interest in LT for other oncologic conditions. Here, we discuss the role of LT for rare oncologic indications including metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), hepatic epitheliod hemangioendothelioma (HEHE), fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FLC), and hepatic angiosarcoma (HAS).

RECENT FINDINGS

Conditions reviewed have been documented indications for LT in the available literature. We summarize the experience of LT for these indications and proposed management guidelines.

SUMMARY

GEP-NETs with isolated metastases to the liver can be treated with LT with excellent long-term outcomes (10-year survival 88%) if strict selection criteria are used (low-intermediate grade, Ki-67% < 20%, complete resection of primary tumor, stable disease for 6 months, <50% hepatic involvement). HEHE is a rare hepatic tumor for which LT can be performed with reported 10-year survival around 70%. FLC is a distinct clinical entity to HCC and is optimally treated with surgical resection though experience with LT is described in observational series (5-year survival 50%, recurrence in 10%). HAS is a rapidly progressive tumor with a dismal prognosis with or without treatment, including LT.

Liver Transplant as a Treatment of Primary and Secondary Liver Neoplasms

Importance

Liver malignancies are an increasing global health concern with a high mortality. We review outcomes following liver transplant for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies.

Observations

Transplant may be a suitable treatment option for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies in well-selected patient populations.

Conclusions and Relevance

Many patients with primary or secondary liver tumors are not eligible for liver resection because of advanced underlying liver disease or high tumor burden, precluding complete tumor clearance. Although liver transplant has been a long-standing treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, recently transplant has been considered for patients with other malignant diagnoses. In particular, while well-established for hepatocellular carcinoma and select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, transplant has been increasingly used to treat patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, as well as metastatic disease from colorectal liver and neuroendocrine primary tumors. Because of the limited availability of grafts and the number of patients on the waiting list, optimal selection criteria must be further defined. The ethics of organ allocation to individuals who may benefit from prolonged survival after transplant yet have a high incidence of recurrence, as well as the role of living donation, need to be further discerned in the setting of transplant oncology.

Transplant oncology - Current indications and strategies to advance the field

Liver transplantation (LT) was originally described by Starzl as a promising strategy to treat primary malignancies of the liver. Confronted with high recurrence rates, indications drifted towards non-oncologic liver diseases with LT finally evolving from a high-risk surgery to an almost routine surgical procedure. Continuously improving outcomes following LT and evolving oncological treatment strategies have driven renewed interest in transplant oncology. This is not only reflected by constant refinements to the criteria for LT in patients with HCC, but especially by efforts to expand indications to other primary and secondary liver malignancies. With new patient-centred oncological treatments on the rise and new technologies to expand the donor pool, the field has the chance to come full circle. In this review, we focus on the concept of transplant oncology, current indications, as well as technical and ethical aspects in the context of donor organs as precious resources.

Liver transplantation meets gastrointestinal cancer

Liver transplantation (LT) has emerged as a standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease, providing a life-saving intervention for patients with severely compromised liver function in both the acute and chronic setting. While LT has also become a routine procedure for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), offering a potential cure by treating both the tumor and the underlying liver disease, its relevance in the context of other malignancies such as cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA), combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) or liver metastases is still the subject of intense debate and no definite recommendations have yet been established. This review summarizes the current therapeutic standards in the context of LT for gastrointestinal malignancies and provides a reflection and outlook on current scientific and clinical developments.

Insights into the history and tendency of liver transplantation for liver cancer: a bibliometric-based visual analysis

Research on liver transplantation (LT) for liver cancer has gained increasing attention. This paper has comprehensively described the current status, hotspots and trends in this field. A total of 2991 relevant articles from 1 January 1963 to 28 February 2023 were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection. VOSviewer and CiteSpace software were utilized as bibliometric tools to analyze and visualize knowledge mapping. Between 1963 and 2023, the number of papers in the area of LT for liver cancer increased continuously. A total of 70 countries/regions, 2303 institutions and 14 840 researchers have published research articles, with the United States and China being the two most productive countries. Our bibliometric-based visual analysis revealed the expansion of LT indications for liver cancer and the prevention/treatment of cancer recurrence as ongoing research hotspots over the past decades. Meanwhile, emerging studies also focus on downstaging/bridging treatments before LT and the long-term survival of LT recipient, in particular the precise application of immunosuppressants.

Metabolic Tumor Volume from 18F-FDG PET/CT in Combination with Radiologic Measurements to Predict Long-Term Survival Following Transplantation for Colorectal Liver Metastases

The aim of the present study is to report on the ability of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of liver metastases from pre-transplant 18F-FDG PET/CT in combination with conventional radiological measurements from CT scans to predict long-term disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and survival after relapse (SAR) after liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases. The total liver MTV was obtained from the 18F-FDG PET/CT, and the size of the largest metastasis and the total number of metastases were obtained from the CT. DFS, OS, and SAR for patients with a low and high MTV, in combination with a low and high size, number, and tumor burden score, were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Patients with a low number of metastases and low MTV had a significantly longer OS than those with a high MTV, with a median survival of 151 vs. 26 months (p = 0.010). Patients with a high number of metastases and low MTV had significantly longer DFS, OS, and SAR than patients with a high MTV (p = 0.034, 0.006, and 0.026). The tumor burden score of group/zone 3, in combination with a low MTV, had a significantly improved DFS, OS, and SAR compared to those with a high MTV (p = 0.034, <0.001, and 0.006). Patients with a low MTV of liver metastases had a long DFS, OS, and SAR despite a high number of liver metastases and a high tumor burden score.

Chinese expert consensus on multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases

Many management strategies are available for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with liver metastases. However, a lack of biological, molecular, and genomic information and an absence of data from rigorous trials limit the validity of these strategies. This review presents the viewpoints from an international conference consisting of several expert working groups. The working groups reviewed a series of questions of particular interest to clinicians taking care of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with liver metastases by reviewing the existing management strategies and literature, evaluating the evidence on which management decisions were based, developing internationally acceptable recommendations for clinical practice, and making recommendations for clinical and research endeavors. The review for each question will be followed by recommendations from the panel.

Transplant Oncology: An Emerging Discipline of Cancer Treatment

Transplant oncology is an emerging concept of cancer treatment with a promising prospective outcome. The applications of oncology, transplant medicine, and surgery are the core of transplant oncology to improve patients' survival and quality of life. The main concept of transplant oncology is to radically cure cancer by removing the diseased organ and replacing it with a healthy one, aiming to improve the survival outcomes and quality of life of cancer patients. Subsequently, it seeks to expand the treatment options and research for hepatobiliary malignancies, which have seen significantly improved survival outcomes after the implementation of liver transplantation (LT). In the case of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the transplant setting, where the liver is the most common site of metastasis of patients who are considered to have unresectable disease, initial studies have shown improved survival for LT treatment compared to palliative therapy interventions. The indications of LT for hepatobiliary malignancies have been slowly expanded over the years beyond Milan criteria in a stepwise manner. However, the outcome improvements and overall patient survival are limited to the specifics of the setting and systematic intervention options. This review aims to illustrate the representative concepts and history of transplant oncology as an emerging discipline for the management of hepatobiliary malignancies, in addition to other emerging concepts, such as the uses of immunotherapy in a peri-transplant setting as well as the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for surveillance post-transplantation.

The Role of Liver Transplantation in the Treatment of Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Transplant oncology is a new field of medicine referred to the use of solid organ transplantation, particularly the liver, to improve prognosis and quality of life in cancer patients. In unresectable, liver-only metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the digestive tract, liver transplantation represents a competitive chance of cure. Due to the limited resource of donated organs, accurate patients' selection is crucial in order to maximize transplant benefit. Several tumor- and patient-related factors should be considered. Among them, primary tumors with a low grade of differentiation (G1-G2 or Ki67 < 10%), located in a region drained by the portal system and removed before transplantation with at least 3-6 months period of disease stability observed before transplant listing, can be considered for transplantation. In case of NET located in the pancreas, extended lymphadenectomy should complement curative pancreatic resection. A number of other features are described in this review of liver transplantation for NET metastases. Comprehensive approach including various forms of non-surgical treatment and detailed planning and timing of total hepatectomy are discussed. Open issues remain on possible expansion of current criteria while maintaining the same long-term benefit demonstrated with the Milan NET criteria with respect to other non-transplant options, with particular reference to liver resection, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and locoregional and systemic treatments.

Long-Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for the Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review

Liver transplantation is an uncommonly used, controversially debated therapeutic approach for highly selected individuals with neuroendocrine liver metastases. Synthesising evidence regarding outcomes from this approach is crucial to understand its position within the broad neuroendocrine liver metastases armamentarium. In this narrative systematic review of studies published in PubMed, Scopus and OVID until 1 July 2021, we summarise and critically appraise the existing literature regarding this modality, with a special focus on long-term outcomes data where possible. Fourteen studies were identified that reported outcomes from the use of liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. No randomised trials were identified. Generally, indications and selection criteria were poorly articulated, with the notable exception of studies using the Milan criteria. The median 5-year overall survival was 65% (ranging from 36% to 97.2%, 11 studies), and the median 10-year overall survival was 50% (ranging from 46.1% to 88.8%, 3 studies). One additional study focussed on treatments and outcomes following post-transplant recurrence. No studies reported outcomes past 10 years. Further follow-up of the largest series with explicit selection criteria will deepen our understanding of the role that transplantation has to play in this setting.

[Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive tract: Focus on pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors]

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are rare tumors showing a rising incidence. They are well-differentiated tumors, classified by grade according to their Ki67 index value (grade 1 to 3). Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are mainly sporadic tumors but about 10% arise within endocrine tumor syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. They can be responsible for functional syndromes or non-specific clinical symptoms depending on tumor extension. However, there is also an increase of incidental diagnoses of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with the widespread use of high-quality imaging techniques. About 50 % of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are diagnosed at a metastatic stage, with metastases often located in the liver. Chromogranin A, CT-scan and often an abdominal MRI, and functional imaging should be performed for tumor staging and follow-up. Imaging with PET/CT with 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues has the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, while 18fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT can sometimes be useful. Overall, they are rather indolent tumors with prolonged survival. Surgery is the recommended treatment in the localized setting, with the exception of small<2cm nonfunctional tumors that can be monitored with imaging techniques. For advanced tumors, there are several available treatments such as somatostatine analogues, chemotherapy, targeted therapies (sunitinib, everolimus), locoregional ablative therapies and Peptide Receptor Radiolabelled Therapy. The treatment strategy will depend on the initial tumor staging, tumor grade, aggressiveness and patient's choice.

Long-Term Survival, Prognostic Factors, and Selection of Patients With Colorectal Cancer for Liver Transplant: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

IMPORTANCE

Liver transplant for colorectal cancer with liver metastases was abandoned in the 1990s due to poor overall survival. From 2006, liver transplant for in nonresectable colorectal liver metastases has been reexamined through different prospective trials.

OBJECTIVE

To determine predictive factors for transplant long-term survival and cure after liver transplant.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a prospective, nonrandomized controlled cohort study derived from different clinical trials on liver transplant for colorectal liver metastases from 2006 to 2020 at Oslo University Hospital. The trials differed in prognostic inclusion criteria, but the design was otherwise identical regarding follow-up scheme to determine disease recurrence, overall survival, and survival after relapse. Final data analysis was performed on December 31, 2021. All patients with colorectal liver metastases from comparable prospective liver transplant studies were included.

EXPOSURE

Liver transplant.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Disease-free survival, overall survival, and survival time after recurrence were determined in all participants.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients (median [range] age, 57.8 [28.7-71.1] years; 35 male [57.4%]) underwent liver transplant at Oslo University Hospital. Posttransplant observation time ranged from 16 to 165 months, and no patient was lost to follow-up. Median disease-free period, overall survival, and survival after relapse were 11.8 (95% CI, 9.3-14.2) months, 60.3 (95% CI, 44.3-76.4) months, and 37.1 (95% CI, 4.6-69.5) months, respectively. Negative predictive factors for overall survival included the following: largest tumor size greater than 5.5 cm (median OS, 25.3 months; 95% CI, 15.8-34.8 months; P <.001), progressive disease while receiving chemotherapy (median OS, 39.8 months; 95% CI, 28.8-50.7 months; P = .02), plasma carcinoembryonic antigen values greater than 80 μg/L (median OS, 26.6 months; 95% CI, 22.7-30.6 months; P <.001), liver metabolic tumor volume on positron emission tomography of greater than 70 cm3 (26.6 months; 95% CI, 11.8-41.5 months; P <.001), primary tumor in the ascending colon (17.9 months; 95% CI, 0-37.5 months; P <.001), tumor burden score of 9 or higher (23.3 months; 95% CI, 19.2-27.4 months; P = .02), and 9 or more liver lesions (42.5 months; 95% CI, 17.2-67.8 months; P = .02). An Oslo score of 0 or Fong Clinical Risk Score of 1 yielded 10-year survival of 88.9% and 80.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that selected patients with liver-only metastases and favorable pretransplant prognostic scoring had long-term survival comparable with conventional indications for liver transplant, thus providing a potential curative treatment option in patients otherwise offered only palliative care.

Case Report: Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor: two cases report with literature review

Background & Aims

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (PHNETs) are rare malignant liver tumors that present diagnostic challenges owing to their rarity and absence of specific clinical features. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of this rare liver tumor to enhance our understanding of the disease, improve diagnostic accuracy, and explore standardized diagnostic and treatment approaches.

Case description

During physical examination, two elderly women, aged 64 and 74 years, were found to have liver masses. 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) and Ga68-DOTATATE PET-CT scans of both individuals revealed multiple liver masses that were initially suspected to be hepatic neuroendocrine tumors. Subsequent puncture pathology confirmed the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors. Furthermore, in Case 1, the tumor was also detected by 18F-FDG PET-CT in the lung, suggesting a metastatic tumor, in conjunction with liver immunohistochemistry and imaging findings. Laboratory tests revealed no significant abnormalities in liver function or autoimmune liver disease indicators, and there was no evidence of viral hepatitis infection. However, partial hepatectomy was not indicated for cases with distant metastasis or multiple space-occupying lesions. Individualized treatment approaches have been developed for such situations. A large portion of the tumor underwent Transarterial Embolization (TAE), and targeted combination chemotherapy or endocrine therapy was administered based on the pathological results. During regular follow-ups a 13 and 12 months, the tumor remained stable. The patients' quality of life was good, and their psychological well-being was healthy. They led active lifestyles, demonstrated a thorough understanding of their disease and its progression, and actively cooperated during the follow-up process.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that a combination of serological, radiological, and immunohistochemical examinations can aid in the diagnosis of PHNET. In addition, we determined that TAE combined with drug therapy could be an effective method for controlling PHNET progression. Regular postoperative follow-ups are important for monitoring the prognosis and tumor progression status of patients with PHNET.

Updates and Expert Opinions on Liver Transplantation for Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Transplant oncology is a relatively new field in which transplantation is used to treat patients who would otherwise be unresectable. New anticancer treatment paradigms using tumor and transplant immunology and cancer immunogenomics are emerging. In turn, liver transplantation (LT) has become a potential therapy for certain patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with liver metastasis, hepatocellular (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of the liver. Although there are established criteria for LT in HCC, evidence regarding LT as a treatment modality for certain gastrointestinal malignancies is still debated. The aim of this review is to highlight updates in the role of LT for certain malignancies, including HCC, metastatic CRC, hilar CCA, and neuroendocrine tumor (NET), as well as contextualize LT use and discuss controversies in transplant oncology.

Liver Transplant for Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Report of 2 Exceptional Cases and Literature Review

Patients with neuroendocrine tumors with unresec-table liver involvement can benefit from liver transplant. There is a specific set of guidelines for neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastasis that involve less than 50% of the liver. However, beyond those guidelines, there are reports of exceptional criteria patients who benefited from liver transplant. Here, we present 2 unusual cases of patients with exceptional circumstances and with neuroendocrine tumors who underwent liver transplant. The first case describes a patient with an extremely rare neuroen-docrine tumor of the proximal common bile duct that caused liver biliary cirrhosis. The patient underwent tumor resection and liver transplant concurrently. The second case describes a patient with a neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary origin with more than 50% hepatic involvement who received a liver transplant after downstaging. In our center, patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from neuroendoc-rine tumors are currently selected for liver transplant based on well-established criteria. However, these 2 cases did not meet the criteria for consideration of liver transplant; thus, multidisciplinary team sessions were held to discuss these 2 cases. After a period of nonsurgical treatment and evaluation of the tumor behavior, we selected the patients as candidates for liver transplant based on the favorable tumor behavior and favorable response to treatment. For both patients, we did not observe any signs of tumor recurrence during follow-up. The outcomes were acceptable, and the patients tolerated treatment well. Considering the favorable tumor pathology (G1 phase and low Ki67 index), we suggest that more studies should be conducted to evaluate the outcomes of patients with low-grade tumors and that the criteria for patients with low-grade tumors could be extended based on such future data.

Transplant oncology: multivisceral transplantation for neuroendocrine tumor and liver metastasis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) liver metastatic lesions are often multiple and found to be unresectable. Rationale of multivisceral transplantation (MVT: liver-pancreas-intestine transplantation) include radical and complete resection of primary, visible and invisible metastatic tumors by removing all abdominal organs and the lymphatic system. This review aims to describe the concept of MVT for NET and neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM), patient selection, timing of MVT, and posttransplant outcomes and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although indication criteria of MVT for NET vary between transplant centers, the Milan-NET criteria for liver transplant are often applied to MVT candidates. Extra-abdominal tumors such as lung and/or bone lesions should be ruled out prior to MVT. Histology should be confirmed as low-grade (G1/G2). Ki-67 should be also checked to confirm biologic features. Timing of MVT remains controversial, whereas many experts recommend 6 months of disease stability prior to MVT.

SUMMARY

Although MVT would not be a standard therapy because of limited access to MVT centers, benefit of MVT should be recognized, which includes its potential ability to better achieve curative resection of disseminated tumors in the abdominal cavity. Early referral of difficult cases to MVT centers should be considered before palliative best supportive cares.

Transplantation for metastatic liver disease

The liver is a common site of metastases from many cancers, particularly those originating in the gastrointestinal tract. Liver transplantation is an uncommonly used but promising and at times controversial treatment option for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases. Transplantation with meticulous patient selection has been associated with excellent long-term outcomes in individuals with neuroendocrine liver metastases, but questions remain regarding the role of transplantation in those who could also be eligible for hepatectomy, the role of neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments in minimising recurrence, and the optimal timing of the procedure. A prospective pilot study of liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases that reported a 5-year overall survival rate of 60% reinvigorated interest in this area following initially dismal outcomes. This has been followed by larger studies, and prospective trials are ongoing to quantify the potential benefits of liver transplantation over palliative chemotherapy. This review provides a critical summary of currently available knowledge on liver transplantation for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases, and highlights avenues for further study to address gaps in the evidence base.

Controversy Over Liver Transplantation or Resection for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: Tumor Biology Cuts the Deal

BACKGROUND

In patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM), liver transplantation (LT) is an alternative to liver resection (LR), although the choice of therapy remains controversial. In this multicenter study, we aim to provide novel insight in this dispute.

METHODS

Following a systematic literature search, 15 large international centers were contacted to provide comprehensive data on their patients after LR or LT for NELM. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, while multivariable Cox regression served to identify factors influencing survival after either transplantation or resection. Inverse probability weighting and propensity score matching was used for analyses with balanced and equalized baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 455 patients were analyzed, including 230 after LR and 225 after LT, with a median follow-up of 97 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 85-110 months]. Multivariable analysis revealed G3 grading as a negative prognostic factor for LR [hazard ratio (HR)=2.22, 95% CI: 1.04-4.77, P =0.040], while G2 grading (HR=2.52, 95% CI: 1.15-5.52, P =0.021) and LT outside Milan criteria (HR=2.40, 95% CI: 1.16-4.92, P =0.018) were negative prognostic factors in transplanted patients. Inverse probability-weighted multivariate analyses revealed a distinct survival benefit after LT. Matched patients presented a median overall survival (OS) of 197 months (95% CI: 143-not reached) and a 73% 5-year OS after LT, and 119 months (95% CI: 74-133 months) and a 52.8% 5-year OS after LR (HR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, P =0.022). However, the survival benefit after LT was lost if patients were transplanted outside Milan criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicentric study in patients with NELM demonstrates a survival benefit of LT over LR. This benefit depends on adherence to selection criteria, in particular low-grade tumor biology and Milan criteria, and must be balanced against potential risks of LT.

Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are relatively uncommon malignancies, characterized as either functional or nonfunctional secondary to their secretion of biologically active hormones. A wide range of clinical behavior can be seen, with the primary prognostic indicator being tumor grade as defined by the Ki67 proliferation index and mitotic index. Surgery is the primary treatment modality for PNETs. While functional PNETs should undergo resection for symptom control as well as potential curative intent, nonfunctional PNETs are increasingly managed nonoperatively. There is increasing data to suggest small, nonfunctional PNETs (less than 2 cm) are appropriate follow with nonoperative active surveillance. Evidence supports surgical management of metastatic disease if possible, and occasionally even surgical management of the primary tumor in the setting of widespread metastases. In this review, we highlight the evolving surgical management of local and metastatic PNETs.

Defining a New Classification System for the Surgical Management of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

Although rarely curative, hepatic cytoreduction of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM) is associated with improved symptom control and prolonged survival. Preoperative 68Ga DOTATATE and gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI can improve characterization of hepatic disease extent to improve surgical clearance, and resection of the primary tumor is associated with improved survival regardless of whether the liver metastases are treated. As parenchymal-sparing surgical techniques and the lowering of the debulking threshold have expanded the numbers of eligible NETLM patients for hepatic cytoreduction, we propose a new classification system to help guide surgical management. A multimodal approach that includes surgery, liver-directed therapies, and systemic therapies has improved outcomes and increased longevity for patients with well-differentiated metastatic NET.

Liver transplantation in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors are part of a heterogeneous group of tumors located in organs such as the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), lungs, thymus, thyroid, and adrenal glands. The most prevalent sites are the small intestine, cecal appendix, and pancreas. More than 50% of these tumors are associated with metastases at the time of diagnosis. Neuroendocrine tumors are classified according to the degree of cell differentiation and the histopathological proliferation index of the lesion. Neuroendocrine tumors can be well differentiated or poorly differentiated. G3 tumors are characterized by Ki-67 expression greater than 20% and can be either well differentiated (G3 NET) or poorly differentiated (G3 NEC). Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC G3) is subdivided into small-cell and large-cell types. When neuroendocrine tumors present clinical and compressive symptoms, carcinoid syndrome is evident. Carcinoid syndrome occurs when the tumor produces neuroendocrine mediators that cannot be metabolized by the liver due to either the size of the tumor or their secretion by the liver itself. Several therapeutic strategies have been described for the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, including curative or palliative surgical approaches, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, percutaneous therapy, systemic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Liver surgery is the only approach that can offer a cure for metastatic patients. Liver metastases must be completely resected, and in this context, orthotopic liver transplantation has gained prominence for yielding very promising outcomes in selected cases. The aim of this study is to review the literature on OLT as a form of treatment with curative intent for patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastasis.

Where Are We Now with Liver Transplantation in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms? The Place of Liver Transplantation for Grades 1 and 2 Well-Differentiated Unresectable Liver Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review outlines the role of liver transplantation in selected patients with unresectable neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases. It discusses the international consensus on eligibility criteria and outlines the efforts taking place in the UK and Ireland to develop effective national liver transplant programmes for neuroendocrine tumour patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the early history of liver transplantation, indications included cancer metastases to the liver as well as primaries of liver origin. Often, liver transplantation was a salvage procedure. The early results were disappointing, including in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. These data discouraged the widespread adoption of liver transplantation for neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases (NET LM). A few centres persisted in performing liver transplantation for patients with NET LM and in determining parameters predictive of good outcomes. Their work has provided evidence for benefit of liver transplantation in a selected group of patients with NET LM. Liver transplantation for NET LM is now accepted as a valid indication by many professional bodies, including the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). It is nevertheless rarely utilised. The UK and the Republic of Ireland are commencing a pilot programme of liver transplantation in selected patients. This programme will help develop the expertise and infrastructure to make liver transplantation for NET LM a routine procedure.

Overall Survival in Patients with Stage IV Pan-NET Eligible for Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The use of liver transplantation (LT) in patients with stage IV neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (pan-NET) is under debate. Previous studies report a 5-year survival of 27-53% after LT in pan-NET and up to 92.7% in patients with mixed NETs. This study aimed to determine survival rates of patients with stage IV pan-NET meeting criteria for LT while only subjected to multimodal treatment.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with pan-NET diagnosed from 2000 to 2021 at a tertiary referral center were evaluated for eligibility. Patients without liver metastases, who did not undergo primary tumor surgery, age > 75 years and with grade 3 tumors were excluded. The patients were divided into groups; all included patients, patients meeting the Milan, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) or the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) criteria for LT. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate overall survival.

RESULTS

Out of 519 patients with pan-NET, 41 patients were included. Mean follow-up time was 5.4 years. Overall survival was 9.3 years (95% Cl 6.8-11.7), and 5-year survival was 64.7% (95% CI 48.2-81.2). Patients meeting the Milan, ENETS and UNOS criteria for LT had a 5-year survival of 64.9% (95% CI 32.2-97.6), 85.7% (95% CI 59.8-100.0) and 55.4% (95% CI 26.0-84.8), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stage IV pan-NET, grade 1 and 2, with no extra abdominal disease, 5-year survival was 64.7% (95% CI 48.2-81.2). As these survival rates exceed previously published series of LT for pan-NET, the evidence base for this treatment is very weak.

Metabolic tumor volume predicts long-term survival after transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: 15 years of experience from the SECA study

OBJECTIVE

To report 15 years of experience with metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of liver metastases from the preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict long-term survival after liver transplantation (LT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

The preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT from all SECA 1 and 2 patients was evaluated. MTV was obtained from all liver metastases. The patients were divided into one group with low MTV (< 70 cm3) and one group with high MTV (> 70 cm3) based on a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and post recurrence survival (PRS) for patients with low versus high MTV were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. Clinopathological features between the two groups were compared by a nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test for continuous and Fishers exact test for categorical data.

RESULTS

At total of 40 patients were included. Patients with low MTV had significantly longer OS (p < 0.001), DFS (p < 0.001) and PRS (p = 0.006) compared to patients with high values. The patients with high MTV had higher CEA levels, number of liver metastases, size of the largest liver metastasis, N-stage, number of chemotherapy lines and more frequently progression of disease at LT compared to the patients with low MTV.

CONCLUSION

MTV of liver metastases is highly predictive of long-term OS, DFS and PRS after LT for unresectable CRLM and should be implemented in risk stratification prior to LT.

Surgery, Liver Directed Therapy and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are described by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification by grade (1–3) and degree of differentiation. Grade 1 and 2; well differentiated PNETs are often characterized as relatively “indolent” tumors for which locoregional therapies have been shown to be effective for palliation of symptom control and prolongation of survival even in the setting of advanced disease. The treatment of liver metastases includes surgical and non-surgical modalities with varying degrees of invasiveness; efficacy; and risk. Most of these modalities have not been prospectively compared. This paper reviews literature that has been published on treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases using surgery; liver directed embolization and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Surgery is associated with the longest survival in patients with resectable disease burden. Liver-directed (hepatic artery) therapies can sometimes convert patients with borderline disease into candidates for surgery. Among the three embolization modalities; the preponderance of data suggests chemoembolization offers superior radiographic response compared to bland embolization and radioembolization; but all have similar survival. PRRT was initially approved as salvage therapy in patients with advanced disease that was not amenable to resection or embolization; though the role of PRRT is evolving rapidly

PET-Uptake in Liver Metastases as Method to Predict Tumor Biological Behavior in Patients Transplanted for Colorectal Liver Metastases Developing Lung Recurrence

The objective of the study was to determine the impact of PET uptake on liver metastases on overall survival (OS) after resection of pulmonary metastases in patients who had received liver transplantation (LT) due to unresectable colorectal liver-only metastases. Resection of pulmonary colorectal metastases is controversial. Some hospitals offer this treatment to selected patients, whereas other hospitals do not perform the procedure in colorectal cancer patients who develop pulmonary metastases. All patients included in the LT studies who developed pulmonary metastases as first site of relapse, and had resection of these as first treatment, were included in this report. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in liver was derived from the pre-transplant PET examinations. OS from time of resection was calculated by the Kaplan−Meier method. Patients with low MTV (<70 cm3) had significantly longer OS from time of resection of pulmonary metastases compared to patients with high MTV (>70 cm3). Patients with low MTV in the liver had 10-year OS from time of pulmonary resections of 86%. Liver MTV values from pre-transplant PET examinations may predict long OS in colorectal cancer patients with a resection of pulmonary metastases developing after LT. Thus, in selected colorectal cancer patients developing pulmonary metastases resection of these metastases should be the treatment of choice.

[Liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors]

Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) are very heterogeneous with respect to the clinical presentation and the prognosis. The treatment of NELMs requires a multidisciplinary approach and patients with NELM should be referred to a specialized center. When possible, the resection of NELMs provides the best long-term results. The general selection criteria for liver resection include an acceptable general physical condition for a large liver operation, tumors with a favorable differentiation grade 1 or 2, a lack of extrahepatic lesions, a sufficient residual liver volume and the possibility to resect at least 70% of the metastases. Supplementary treatment, including simultaneous liver ablation, are generally safe and can increase the number of patients who can be considered for surgery. For patients with resectable NELM, the resection of the primary tumor is recommended either in a 2-stage or combined procedure. In selected patients with nonresectable NELM a liver transplantation can be carried out, which can be associated with excellent long-term results.

Differenzierte Therapiestrategie bei Lebermetastasen gastro-entero-pankreatischer Neuroendokriner Neoplasien

Neuroendokrine Neoplasien (NEN) bilden eine heterogene Gruppe maligner Tumoren, die überwiegend dem gastro-entero-pankreatischen System (GEP) zuzuordnen sind. Hierbei sind Dünndarm und Pankreas die häufigsten Organe für Primärtumoren, die Leber stellt den dominanten Metastasierungsort dar. Da viele Patient*innen lange asymptomatisch bleiben, führen oftmals zufällig diagnostizierte Lebermetastasen oder ein Ileus zur Diagnose. Die einzige kurative Therapieoption stellt die komplette Entfernung von Primarius und Metastasen dar. Besonders im Falle der metastasierten Erkrankung sollten die vorhandenen Therapieoptionen immer im interdisziplinären Tumorboard mit Spezialisten*innen aus Gastroenterologie, (Leber-)Chirurgie, Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin, Radiotherapie, Pathologie und Endokrinologie evaluiert werden. Durch die Kombination der verschiedenen Therapieverfahren kann auch für Patient*innen mit fortgeschrittener Erkrankung eine jahrelange Prognose bei guter Lebensqualität erreicht werden. Wichtig für die Therapieentscheidung sind neben patientenindividuellen Faktoren der Differenzierungsgrad des Tumors, dessen hormonelle Sekretion, das Metastasierungsmuster und der Erkrankungsverlauf. Die Behandlung von Lebermetastasen umfasst neben den unterschiedlichen chirurgischen Strategien die lokal-ablativen radiologischen und nuklearmedizinischen Verfahren, die als Ergänzung zu den systemischen Therapien zur Verfügung stehen.

Liver Transplant for Non-Hepatocellular Malignancies: A Review for Radiologists

Although traditionally only performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the last decade has seen a resurgence in the use of liver transplant (LT) for non-HCC malignancies, likely due to improvements in neoadjuvant treatment regimens as well as the establishment of well-defined eligibility criteria. Given promising survival results, patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine liver metastases, and hepatic hemangioendothelioma are eligible to receive Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception for tumors that meet well-defined criteria. Additional tumors such as colorectal cancer liver metastases, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and hepatocholangiocarcinoma may undergo transplant at specialized centers with well-defined protocols, although are not yet eligible for MELD exception. Transplant eligibility criteria commonly incorporate imaging findings, yet due to the relatively novel and evolving nature of LT for non-HCC malignancies, radiologists may be unaware of relevant criteria or of the implications of their imaging interpretations. Knowledge of the allocation process, background, and liver transplant selection criteria facilitates the radiologist' active participation in multidisciplinary discussion, leading to better and more equitable care for transplant candidates with non-HCC malignancy. This review provides an overview of transplant allocation and selection criteria in patients with non-HCC malignancy, with an emphasis on imaging features and the role of the radiologist.

Current status of surgical management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the gastroenteropancreatic system are rare and heterogeneous tumours, yet with increasing prevalence. The most frequent primary sites are the small intestine, rectum, pancreas, and stomach. For a localized disease, surgical resection with local lymph nodes is usually curative with good overall and disease free survival. More complex situation is the treatment of locally advanced lesions, liver metastases, and, surprisingly, small asymptomatic tumours of the rectum and pancreas. In this review, we focus on the current role of surgical management of gastroenteropancreatic NENs. We present surgical approach for the most frequent primary sites. We highlight the role of endoscopic surgery and the watch-and-wait strategy for selected cases. As liver metastases pose an important clinical challenge, we present current indications and contraindications for liver resection and a role of liver transplantation for metastatic NENs.

Multimodal Management of Grade 1 and 2 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) are rare tumors with a recent growing incidence. In the 2017 WHO classification, p-NETs are classified into well-differentiated (i.e., p-NETs grade 1 to 3) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (i.e., p-NECs). P-NETs G1 and G2 are often non-functioning tumors, of which the prognosis depends on the metastatic status. In the localized setting, p-NETs should be surgically managed, as no benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated. Parenchymal sparing resection, including both duodenum and pancreas, are safe procedures in selected patients with reduced endocrine and exocrine long-term dysfunction. When the p-NET is benign or borderline malignant, this surgical option is associated with low rates of severe postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality. This narrative review offers comments, tips, and tricks from reviewing the available literature on these different options in order to clarify their indications. We also sum up the overall current data on p-NETs G1 and G2 management.