The influence of histopathologic tumor viability on long-term survival and recurrence rates following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma

Rethinking tumor viability as prognostic factor in soft tissue sarcoma

Background

Histopathologic assessment of tumor viability has emerged as a potential predictive factor of outcomes in various cancers. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of viability in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma while accounting for different adjuvant regimens and clinical variables.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 147 patients surgically treated for high-grade soft tissue sarcoma between 2010 and 2021 at a single institution. Perioperative, clinical and surveillance data were collected. Tumor viability was determined through histopathologic analysis by a board-certified pathologist.

Results

No significant differences in clinical variables were observed between groups with ≤10 % and >10 % tumor viability. Neoadjuvant treatments, tumor grade, size, and depth did not independently affect tumor viability. There was no statistically decreased risk of local recurrence in the group with ≤10 % viability compared to the group with >10 % viability (HR = 1.19, 95 % CI [0.57,2.50]) (p = 0.64). Margin status was the only variable that significantly increases the risk of LR on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

This cohort suggests that neoadjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or their combination did not influence tumor viability predictably. Notably, tumors without neoadjuvant treatment exhibited a high rate of necrosis, potentially confounding the interpretation of treatment effect. Other factors such as tumor type may play a more significant role in the cause of tumor necrosis than originally thought. Pathologic tissue response continues to offer value for the management of STS, but these findings underscore the need for further investigation into tumor viability in soft tissue sarcoma, targeting specific treatments analyzed in large collaborative studies.

Timing of Surgery and Postoperative Outcomes in Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study in North India

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy is the usual approach to manage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The optimal interval to operate after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) still remains controversial.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted to observe and compare postoperative complications and pathological outcomes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus who underwent NACRT followed by surgery within 8 weeks or after 8 weeks of NACRT completion. The pathological complete response was assessed using the Mandard tumor regression grade. Morbidity and mortality were compared and were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale.

RESULTS

The study included 50 patients, 19 patients in the < 8-week group and 31 in the > 8-week group study. Patients underwent thoracoscopy-assisted esophagectomy with neoesophagus formation using gastric conduit. There was a significant difference in mortality between the two groups, with three mortalities in the < 8-week group and none in the other group (p = 0.022). Postoperative complications and pathological outcomes did not have a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The pathological response in ESCC cases does not appear to be impacted by the interval between NACRT and surgery; nevertheless, early surgery was associated with a higher risk of mortality.

Predicting Factors for a Favorable Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Favorable pathologic response(FPR) is a significant predictor for improved survival following Neoadjuvant therapy(NAT) in esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer(GEJ). Preoperative prediction of FPR could modify treatment plans. No reliable method for predicting FPR exists. We sought to identify preoperative predicting factors for FPR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with esophageal and GEJ cancer who underwent esophagectomy following (NAT). Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to identify preoperative predicting factors for FPR. A comparison of Tumor Regression Grade(TRG) was used to assess treatment response on overall survival(OS).

RESULTS

Out of 121 patients, 82(67.8%) had neoadjuvant chemoradiation. FPR was observed in 60(49.6%). Female sex, Radiation therapy(RT), squamous cell carcinoma(SCC), lack of signet ring feature, and FDG avidity posttreatment were associated with FPR on univariate analysis. RT and SCC were associated with FPR (OR=3.9 and 4.0, respectively) on multivariate analysis. OS was lower among patients who did not achieve FPR to NAT(P=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

FPR is a predictor of improved OS. SCC and radiation therapy-based protocol were identified as major prediction factors of FPR in patients with esophageal and GEJ cancers.

Applying post-neoadjuvant pathologic stage as prognostic tool in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

It is still uncertain whether the newly released eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) post-neoadjuvant pathologic (yp) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage for esophageal carcinoma can perform well regarding patient stratification. The current study aimed to assess the prognostication ability of the eighth AJCC ypTNM staging system and attempted to explore how to facilitate the staging system for more effective evaluation of prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 486 patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (nRT/CRT) were enrolled. ypN stage was reclassified by recursive partitioning. Prognostic performance, monotonicity, homogeneity, and discriminatory of yp and modified yp (myp) staging systems were assessed by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC), linear trend log-rank test, likelihood ratio χ2 test, Harrell's c statistic, and Akaike information criterion (AIC).

RESULTS

The ypT stage, ypN stage, and pathologic response were significant prognostic factors of overall survival. Survival was not discriminated well using the eighth AJCC ypN stage and ypTNM stage. Recursive partitioning reclassified mypN0-N2 as metastasis in 0, 1-2, and ≥3 regional lymph nodes. Applying the ypT stage, mypN stage, and pathologic response to construct the myp staging system, the myp stage performed better in time-dependent ROC, linear trend log-rank test, likelihood ratio χ2 test, Harrell's c statistic, and AIC.

CONCLUSIONS

The eighth AJCC ypTNM staging system performed well in differentiating prognosis to some extent. By reclassifying the ypN stage and enrolling pathologic response as a staging element, the myp staging system holds significant potential for prognostic discrimination.

Prognostic value of visual residual tumour cells (VRTC) for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas after neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery

Background

We assessed visual residual tumour cells (VRTC) with both Becker’s tumour regression grading (TRG) system and Japanese TRG system in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery.

Methods

We compared Becker system and Japanese system in 175 ESCC patients treated between 2009 and 2015.

Results

According to Becker system, the 5-year DFS/DSS rates were 70.0%/89.3, 53.8%/56.7, 43.0%/49.0, and 42.4%/39.1% for TRG 1a (VRTC 0), TRG 1b (1–10%), TRG 2 (11–50%), and TRG 3 (> 50%). According to Japanese system, the rates were 38.8%/34.1, 49.5%/58.7, 50.2%/49.0 and 70.0%/89.3% for Grade 0-1a (VRTC> 66.6%), Grade 1b (33.3–66.6%), Grade 2 (1–33.3%) and Grade 3 (0). TRG according to two systems significantly discriminate the patients’ prognosis. TRG according to Becker system (HR 2.662, 95% CI 1.151–6.157), and lymph node metastasis (HR 2.567, 95% CI 1.442–4.570) were independent parameters of DSS.

Conclusions

Both Becker and Japanese system had their advantage in risk stratification of these ESCC patients. It was speculated that dividing 1–10% VRTC into a group might contribute to independently prognostic significance of Becker’s TRG system. Therefore, in addition to TRG of different systems, the percentage of VRTC might be recommended in the pathologic report, which could make the results more comparable among different researches, and more understandable for oncologists in the clinical practice.

Tumor regression grading after neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results of an international Delphi consensus survey

Complete histopathologic tumor regression after neoadjuvant treatment is a well-known prognostic factor for survival among patients with adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. The aim of this international Delphi survey was to reach a consensus regarding the most useful tumor regression grading (TRG) system that could represent an international standard for histopathologic TRG grading of gastroesophageal carcinomas. Fifteen pathologists with special interest in esophageal and gastric pathology participated in the online survey. The initial questionnaire contained of 43 statements that addressed the following topics: (1) specimen processing, (2) gross examination, (3) cross sectioning, (4) staining, (5) Barrett's esophagus, (6) TRG systems, and (7) TRG in lymph node (LN). Participants rated the items using a 5-point Likert style scale and were encouraged to write comments for each statement. The expert panel recommended a 4-tiered TRG system for assessing the primary tumor: grade 1: No residual tumor (complete histopathologic tumor regression), grade 2: less than 10% residual tumor (near-complete regression), grade 3: 10%-50% residual tumor (partial regression), grade 4: greater than 50% residual tumor (minimal/no regression), combined with a 3-tiered system for grading therapeutic response in metastatic LNs: grade a: no residual tumor (complete histopathologic TRG), grade b: partial regression (tumor cells and regression), grade c: no regression (no sign of tumor response). This TRG grading system can be recommended as an international standard for histopathologic TRG grading in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Alteration of plasma metabolites associated with chemoradiosensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via untargeted metabolomics approach

BACKGROUND

To investigate the differences in plasma metabolomic characteristics between pathological complete response (pCR) and non-pCR patients and identify biomarker candidates for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

A total of 46 ESCC patients were included in this study. Gas chromatography time-of- flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF/MS) technology was applied to detect the plasma samples collected before nCRT via untargeted metabolomics analysis.

RESULTS

Five differentially expressed metabolites (out of 109) was found in plasma between pCR and non-pCR groups. Compared with non-pCR group, isocitric acid (p = 0.0129), linoleic acid (p = 0.0137), citric acid (p = 0.0473) were upregulated, while L-histidine (p = 0.0155), 3'4 dihydroxyhydrocinnamic acid (p = 0.0339) were downregulated in the pCR plasma samples. Pathway analyses unveiled that citrate cycle (TCA cycle), glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolic pathway were associated with ESCC chemoradiosensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The present study provided supporting evidence that GC-TOF/MS based metabolomics approach allowed identification of metabolite differences between pCR and non-pCR patients in plasma levels, and the systemic metabolic status of patients may reflect the response of ESCC patient to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Varying practices in tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal carcinomas after neoadjuvant therapy: results of an international survey

Tumor regression grading is routinely performed on neoadjuvantly treated gastrointestinal cancer resections. Challenges in tumor regression grading include grossing standards, multiple grading systems, and difficulty interpreting therapy-induced changes. We surveyed gastrointestinal pathologists around the world for their practices in handling neoadjuvantly treated gastrointestinal cancer specimens and reporting tumor regression using a 23-question online survey. Topics addressed grossing, histologic work-up, tumor regression grading systems, and degree of difficulty identifying and estimating residual cancer within treatment effect. Two-hundred three responses were received, including 173 participants who completed the entire questionnaire. Fifty percent of the participants were from Europe, 29% from North America, 10% from Australia, and 11% from other continents. Ninety-five percent routinely report a tumor regression grade and 92% have standardized grossing and histologic work-up: 27% always completely embed the entire tumor bed, 54% embed the complete tumor site if not a grossly apparent, large mass. Fifty-nine percent use hematoxylin & eosin alone for assessment; the remaining use additional stains. In North America and Australia, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/College of American Pathologists (CAP)/Ryan system is routinely used for gastroesophageal (71%) and rectal carcinomas (77%). In Europe, the Mandard system is common (36%) for gastroesophageal tumors, followed by AJCC/CAP/Ryan (22%), and Becker (10%); for rectal CA, the Dworak system (30%) is followed by AJCC/CAP/Ryan (24%) and Mandard (14%). This regional differences were significant (p < 0.001 each). Fifty-one percent prefer a four-tiered system. Sixty-six percent think that regressive changes in lymph nodes should be part of a regression grade. Sixty-nine percent consider identifying residual tumor straight-forward, but estimating therapy-induced fibrosis difficult (57%). Free comments raised issues of costs for work-up and clinical relevance. In conclusion, this multinational survey provides a comprehensive overview of grossing and histologic work-up with regards to tumor regression grading in gastrointestinal cancers with partly significant regional differences particularly between North America and Europe.

Plasma microRNA profiles: identification of miR-23a as a novel biomarker for chemoresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aims to explore novel microRNAs in plasma for predicting chemoresistance in preoperative chemotherapy of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) using a microRNA array-based approach.

RESULTS

(1) Four candidate microRNAs (miR-223, 103a, 23b and 23a), which were highly expressed in the pretreatment plasma of patients with a low histopathologic response, were selected. (2) In a large-scale validation analysis by quantitative RT–PCR, plasma levels of miR-223, miR-23b and miR-23a were significantly higher in patients with a low histopathologic response than in those with a high histopathologic response (p = 0.0345, p = 0.0125 and p = 0.0114). (3) Of all candidate microRNAs, miR-23a expression of pretreatment ESCC tumor tissues was significantly higher in ESCC patients with a low histopathologic response than in those with a high histopathologic response (p = 0.0278). (4) After overexpressing each candidate in ESCC cells, miR-23a induced significant chemoresistance to both 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, and miR-223 to cisplatin in vitro. (5) A high level of plasma miR-23a, which tended to correlate with lymphatic invasion (p = 0.0808) and deep depth of invasion (p = 0.0658), was an independent risk factor for chemoresistance in ESCC (p = 0.0222; odds ratio: 12.4; range 1.46–105).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the Toray^® 3D-Gene microRNA array-based approach to compare plasma microRNA levels between patients with a high or a low histopathologic response to chemotherapy. All patients underwent a preoperative chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma miR-23a might be a useful biomarker for predicting chemoresistance in ESCC patients.

Preoperative Nomogram to Risk Stratify Patients for the Benefit of Trimodality Therapy in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Purpose

To develop a nomogram that estimates 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) after trimodality therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma and to assess the overall survival (OS) benefit of esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on the basis of 1-year recurrence risk.

Methods

In total, 568 consecutive patients with potentially resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent CRT were included for analysis, including 373 patients who underwent esophagectomy after CRT (trimodality therapy), and 195 who did not undergo surgery (bimodality therapy). A nomogram for 1-year RFS was created using a Cox regression model. The upper tertile of the nomogram score was used to stratify patients in low-risk and high-risk groups for 1-year recurrence. The 5-year OS was compared between trimodality and bimodality therapy in low-risk and high-risk patients after propensity score matching, respectively.

Results

Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62 months. The 5-year OS in the trimodality and bimodality treatment groups was 56.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.9–64.7) and 36.9% (95% CI 31.4–42.4), respectively. The final nomogram for the prediction of 1-year RFS included male gender, poor histologic grade, signet ring cell adenocarcinoma, cN1, cN2-3, and baseline SUV_max, with accurate calibration and reasonable discrimination (C-statistic: 0.66). Trimodality therapy was associated with improved 5-year OS in low-risk patients (p = 0.003), whereas it showed no significant survival benefit in high-risk patients (p = 0.302).

Conclusions

The proposed nomogram estimates early recurrence risk. The addition of surgery to CRT provides a clear OS benefit in low-risk patients. The OS benefit of surgery in high-risk patients is less pronounced.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-018-6435-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Is pathological complete response after a trimodality therapy, a predictive factor of long-term survival in locally-advanced esophageal cancer? Results of a retrospective monocentric study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term (5- and 10-year) survival and recurrence rates on the basis of the pathological complete response (pCR) in the specimens of patients with esophageal carcinoma, treated with trimodality therapy.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2014, all consecutives patients with esophageal locally-advanced non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (ADC) who received trimodality therapy were reviewed. According to histopathological analysis, patients were divided in two groups with pCR and with pathological residual tumor (pRT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included the disease-free survival (DFS), the recurrence rate, and the predictive factors of overall survival and recurrence.

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients were included: 49 patients with pCR and 54 patients with pRT. The median OS was significantly longer in pCR group than in pRT group (132±22.3 vs. 25.5±4 months), with both 5- and 10-years OS rates of 75.2% vs. 29.1%, and 51.1% vs. 13.6%, respectively (P<0.001). Also, pRT, major postoperative complications (Dindo-Clavien grade>IIIb) and recurrence were the 3 independent predictive factors for worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with locally-advanced oesophageal carcinoma, who responded to trimodality therapy with a pCR, could be achieved a 10-year survival rate of 51%.

Tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy

Neoadjuvant therapy has been successfully introduced in the treatment of locally advanced gastrointestinal malignancies, particularly esophageal, gastric, and rectal cancers. The effects of preoperative chemo- or radiochemotherapy can be determined by histopathological investigation of the resection specimen following this treatment. Frequent histological findings after neoadjuvant therapy include various amounts of residual tumor, inflammation, resorptive changes with infiltrates of foamy histiocytes, foreign body reactions, and scarry fibrosis. Several tumor regression grading (TRG) systems, which aim to categorize the amount of regressive changes after cytotoxic treatment in primary tumor sites, have been proposed for gastroesophageal and rectal carcinomas. These systems primarily refer to the amount of therapy-induced fibrosis in relation to the residual tumor (e.g., the Mandard, Dworak, or AJCC systems) or the estimated percentage of residual tumor in relation to the previous tumor site (e.g., the Becker, Rödel, or Rectal Cancer Regression Grading systems). TRGs provide valuable prognostic information, as in most cases, complete or subtotal tumor regression after neoadjuvant treatment is associated with better patient outcomes. This review describes the typical histopathological findings after neoadjuvant treatment, discusses the most commonly used TRG systems for gastroesophageal and rectal carcinomas, addresses the limitations and critical issues of tumor regression grading in these tumors, and describes the clinical impact of TRG.

Histopathological tumour viability after neoadjuvant chemotherapy influences survival in resected pancreatic cancer: analysis of early outcome data

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly recognized as an effective strategy prior to pancreatoduodenectomy. We investigate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery and the predictive role of viable residual tumour cells histopathologically on outcomes.

METHODS

The study population comprised of 195 consecutive patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were treated with either NAC or a surgery-first (SF) strategy. Histopathological viable tumour cells were examined in the NAC patients and clinicopathological factors were correlated with overall survival.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (22%) were treated with NAC and 153 patients (78%) underwent SF. NAC was associated with higher estimated blood loss during surgery (928 mL versus 615 mL; P = 0.004), fewer (<15) excised lymph nodes (37% versus 17%; P = 0.015) and lower rates of lymphovascular invasion (65% versus 45%; P = 0.044) when compared with SF. Two-year survival of patients undergoing NAC was 63% and 51% in patients undergoing SF (P = 0.048). The 2-year survival of patients who had >65% residual tumour cells was 45% and 90% in patients who had <65% residual tumour cells (P = 0.022). Favourable responders (<65% viable tumour cells) were observed to have shorter operation time (<420 min) (55% versus 13%; P = 0.038), trend towards negative lymph node status (38% versus 10%; P = 0.067) and greater lymph node harvest in node positive patients (≥4 positive lymph nodes) (77% versus 37%; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

The improved survival of patients undergoing NAC indicates effective management of micrometastatic disease and is an effective option requiring further investigation. Histopathological viable tumour cells after NAC was a surrogate marker for survival.

Pathologic Complete Response Is an Independent Predictor of Improved Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Reports of improved survival in patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is extrapolated from heterogeneous studies that include squamous cell histology. We sought to determine if pCR is associated with a survival advantage in a homogenous group of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This is a single institution analysis of all patients with T2-T4 or node positive esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into two groups based on pathological response, pCR vs. incomplete pathological response (iPR). Survival outcomes were evaluated using standard Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 205 patients were included in the study: 38 (19 %) patients with pCR and 167 patients (81 %) with iPR. The two groups were similar with respect to clinical stage, age, gender, comorbid conditions, ECOG status, smoking, and alcohol use. Patients in the pCR group had a higher percentage of tumors located in middle third of esophagus (11 vs. 2 %, p = 0.04) while tumor grade was similar in both groups. Median follow-up was 50 months, range 2-109 months. The 3-year overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for iPR was 48 and 39 %, respectively, vs. 86 and 80 % for pCR group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This analysis of a cohort of homogeneous patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing multimodality therapy showed that pCR is an independent predictor of improved RFS and OS. This data contributes to a growing body of evidence highlighting the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy specific to esophageal adenocarcinoma particularly when pCR is achieved.

[Timing of esophagectomy in multimodal therapy of esophageal cancer: Impact of time interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery on outcome and response]

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy [n(R)CT] has become the standard of care in the multimodal therapy concept for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer; however, optimal timing of surgery is not clearly defined.

OBJECTIVES

The study analyzed whether the length of the interval between completion of n(R)CT and surgery can affect the postoperative outcome, tumor response and long-term survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 106 patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, treated between 2006 and 2013, were included in this study. On the basis of the median time interval to surgery, patients were divided into two groups [group A ≤ 40 days (n = 54) and group B > 40 days (n = 52)] and compared concerning demographic data, preoperative risk scores, morbidity, outcome, tumor response and long-term survival.

RESULTS

The groups were comparable in terms of demographics, preoperative condition of the patients, complications and outcome; however, group A showed a trend towards a higher mortality risk as preoperatively assessed by the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity in esophagogastric surgery patients (O-POSSUM) (p = 0.064) and group B showed a trend towards a higher rate of complete responders (p = 0.097).

CONCLUSION

Concerning perioperative morbidity and mortality, delayed surgery after n(R)CT showed no benefit for the patient's outcome; however, the rate of complete tumor response was higher in patients with a time interval of more than 40 days, although this did not influence long-term survival or recurrence rates.

Factors that affect PERCIST-defined test-retest comparability: an exploration of feasibility in routine clinical practice

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting the comparability of F-FDG PET/CT scans using the PERSIST criteria for treatment response evaluation in a clinical PET/CT unit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer were assessed for treatment response by comparing 2 F-FDG PET/CT scans, at baseline (PET 1) and 1 month after the end of induction chemoradiation (PET 2). According to the PERCIST recommendations, patients with mean SUV normalized by the lean body mass within reference volume of interest that changed less than 0.3 unit and less than 20% were deemed as comparable. Absolute differences of body weight, blood glucose level, activity of F-FDG, and uptake time between the 2 scans were computed. Binary logistic regression was used to identify the predictive factors, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used for thresholds. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine subjects were identified. The mean (SD) values at PET 0 and PET 2 were 5.9 (1.04) mmol/L and 6.2 (1.06) mmol/L (P = 0.013), 54.6 (10.0 kg) and 53.3 (10.3 kg) (P = 0.013), 7.7 (1.3 mCi) and 7.6 (1.5 mCi) (P = 0.349), as well as 74.2 (12.4) minutes and 73.0 (12.3) minutes (P = 0.539), for blood glucose level, body weight, injected activity, and uptake time, respectively. Seventeen (24.6%) failed to match the PERCIST-defined comparability criteria. Case-based discrepancies (mean [SD]) were 0.76 (0.62) mmol/L, 3.4 (2.9) kg, 0.8 (0.7) mCi, and 11.7 (9.8) minutes for blood glucose, body weight, injected activity, and uptake time, respectively, of which only uptake time significantly affected comparability (P = 0.046; odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.12), with a limit of 2.2-minute discrepancy identified as the requirement for 100% comparability.

CONCLUSIONS

Uptake time had the strongest effect on PERCIST-defined comparability. Therefore, for response assessment scans, reference to initial scans for determination of optimal uptake time is recommended.

Prognostic significance of tumor regression grade for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To clarify prognostic factors for the patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) through an assessment of surgically resected specimens modified by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of 143 consecutive patients with ESCC who underwent nCT followed by surgery between 2008 and 2012 at our institution and conducted survival analysis. The tumor regression grade (TRG) was classified based on the proportion of residual tumor cells in the area where the tumor was thought to have existed before nCT as follows: Grade 0 (no therapeutic effect), Grade 1a (residual tumor cells ≥2/3), Grade 1b (1/3≤ residual tumor cells <2/3), Grade 2 (residual tumor cells <1/3), and Grade 3 (no residual tumor).

RESULTS

The 3-year OS and RFS of patients with tumor regression grade 0/1a/1b-3 were 53.6%/73.3%/88.6% and 37.7%/60.5%/83.8%, respectively. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that TRG was an independent predictor of OS (TRG 1a-3: HR, 0.46; 95%CI, 0.23-0.89), in addition to venous invasion, and of RFS (TRG 1a-3: HR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.28-0.84), in addition to ypT factor, and venous invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

TRG is a critical prognostic factor in patients with ESCC who had undergone nCT followed by surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:390-396. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Predictive Factors of Recurrence in Patients with Pathological Complete Response After Esophagectomy Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Minimal data have previously emerged from studies regarding the factors associated with recurrence in patients with ypT0N0M0 status. The purpose of the study was to predict survival and recurrence in patients with pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery for esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

Among 2944 consecutive patients with EC operations in 30 centers between 2000 and 2010, patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery who achieved pCR (n = 191) were analyzed. The factors associated with survival and recurrence were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 593 patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy, pCR was observed in 191 patients (32.2 %). Recurrence occurred in 56 (29.3 %) patients. The median time to recurrence was 12 months. The factors associated with recurrence were postoperative complications grade 3-4 [odds ratio (OR): 2.100; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.008-4.366; p = 0.048) and adenocarcinoma histologic subtype (OR 2.008; 95 % CI 0.1.06-0.3.80; p = 0.032). The median overall survival was 63 months (95 % CI 39.3-87.1), and the median disease-free survival was 48 months (95 % CI 18.3-77.4). Age (>65 years) [hazard ratio (HR): 2.166; 95 % CI 1.170-4.010; p = 0.014), postoperative complications grades 3-4 [HR 2.099; 95 % CI 1.137-3.878; p = 0.018], and radiation dose (<40 Gy) (HR 0.361; 95 % CI 0.159-0.820; p = 0.015) were identified as factors associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

An intensive follow-up may be beneficial for patients with EC who achieve pCR and who develop major postoperative complications or the adenocarcinoma histologic subtype.

Prognostic classification of histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma according to impact on prognosis and to suggest a classification for clinical routine.

BACKGROUND

Measures of histopathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer such as Mandard tumor regression grading focus on the effect on the primary tumor. Although lymph node infiltration is of significant prognostic importance, this criterion is mostly not included in the response classifications.

METHODS

A total of 370 patients (89% males, median age: 61 years) with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (40 Gy, 5-FU, cisplatin) or chemotherapy (MAGIC or FLOT) for cT3, Nx, M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma were included in the analysis. All patients had undergone transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy, with a median of 27 resected lymph nodes and a R0-resection rate of 92%. Histopathologic regression grading differentiated major or minor response according to less or more than 10% vital cells in the primary tumor. The lymph nodes were classified as ypN0 or ypN+.

RESULTS

From the patients with R0 resection and M0 category, 3 groups with significantly different 5-year survival rates (5-YSR) could be differentiated: 1. Major response and ypN0 (n=100) with 5-YSR of 64% 2. Either major response and ypN+ (n=34) 5-YSR 42% or minor response and ypN0 (n=84) 5-YSR 44%, together 42% 5-YSR 3. Minor response and ypN+ (n=111) and 5-YSR of 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined classification of primary tumor regression and lymph node status in 3 grades represents a simple and reproducible prognostic classification of the effect of neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BTG3 upregulation induces cell apoptosis and suppresses invasion in esophageal adenocarcinoma

B cell translocation gene 3 (BTG3) is a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell proliferation, migration, and regulating cell cycle progression in several tumors. However, its role in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains unknown. Here, we detected the expression of BTG3 in EAC tissues and subsequent progression. BTG3 expression was significant decreased in EAC tissues and cell lines detected by real-time RT-PCR and Western blot. Relationships of BTG3 with EAC clinicopathology were analyzed statistically. The decrease expression of BTG3 is associated with lymph node metastases. In vitro assay demonstrated that overexpression of BTG3 significantly suppressed colony formation and proliferation of EAC cells. The suppressed migration and invasion abilities found in BTG3-overexpressing EAC cells. Our findings suggested that BTG3 is suppressor in the progression of EAC.

Alcohol consumption and the neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

In the developed countries, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is increasing over recent decades. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to arrive at quantitative conclusions about the contribution of alcohol intakes and the progression of Barrett's esophagus.

Methods

A comprehensive, systematic bibliographic search of medical literature published up to Oct 2013 was conducted to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted for alcohol consumption on the Barrett's esophagus progression.

Results

A total of 882 cases in 6,867 individuals from 14 observational studies were indemnified in this meta-analysis. The result of this current meta-analysis, including 10 case-control and 4 cohort studies, indicated that alcohol consumption was not associated with the neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.93–1.48). When stratified by the study designs, no significant association was detected in either high vs low group or ever vs never group.

Conclusions

Alcohol drinking is not associated with risk of neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus. Further well designed studies are needed in this area.

Survival and recurrence patterns after neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) for locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

We have previously identified Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5FU (DCF) as a safe, tolerable, and effective regimen in the neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (EGJ). We hypothesized that DCF combined with enhanced surgical control would result in a low rate of local or regional recurrence, and thus reviewed our outcomes with this treatment regimen.

METHODS

A prospectively entered database of all esophageal and EGJ ADC patients resected at a high-volume referral center over 6 years (9/07-9/13) was reviewed for cases treated with curative intent neoadjuvant DCF followed by en bloc resection with extended lymphadenectomy (D2/D3). Recurrences was defined as locoregional (biopsy on endoscopy/regional lymph nodes (LNs)) and distant. Standard statistical techniques were used.

RESULTS

Of 279 patients with ADC, 86 (85% male, mean age 63 years (interquartile range 56-70)) underwent preoperative DCF and curative intent resection for locally advanced ADC (cT3 93%; cN+ 69%) of the EGJ (54%) or distal esophagus (46%). After median follow-up of 40 months, the overall 5-year survival was 54% and 43 (52%) had recurred at a median time of 14 months. Sites of recurrence included locoregional only in 2 of 45 (4%), distant only in 40 of 45 (89%), and locoregional and distant in 3 of 45 (7%).

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrates favourable oncologic outcomes with low local/regional recurrence and an excellent overall 5-year survival after neoadjuvant DCF for esophageal and EGJ ADCs. Because the majority of recurrences were distant, our data support the notion that efforts to improve outcomes in these patients should concentrate on enhancing systemic, rather than local, therapy.