Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis

Is laparoscopic approach as treatment of large gastric GIST acceptable?

AIM

Laparoscopic surgery is widely used for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (≤ 5 cm) but remains a controversial approach for larger gastric GISTs (> 5 cm). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection in comparison with open resection for gastric GISTs measuring over 5 cm.

METHOD

All patients receiving surgery for gastric GIST > 5 cm between 2000 and 2021 in a single tertiary hospital were included. Data were collected from prospectively maintained records. Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used to compare survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 108 included patients, 59 patients had minimally invasive (MI) surgery (54.6%) whereas 49 patients had open surgery (46.4%). The rate of overall postoperative morbidity was 14.8% and the median length was significantly shorter in the MI group [4 (range 2-30) vs. 7 (range 4-33) days; P = 0.007]. The overall R0 resection rate was 98.2% and the rate of tumor rupture was 13%, not different between the two groups. Recurrence occurred in 24% of the whole population without any difference between groups (20.3% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.31). Minimally invasive surgery was not found as a negative prognostic disease-free survival factor.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery could be a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery in large gastric GIST, bringing the benefits of minimally invasive surgery without compromising oncologic results.

Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for a giant bleeding GIST of the stomach: A case report

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare neoplasms often located in the stomach. Elective laparoscopic surgery is the well-established treatment. Often these tumors have a presentation with acute gastrointestinal bleeding and/or as large masses that challenge mini invasive laparoscopic approach. This article describes the case of a patient with large gastric GIST with bleeding onset and discusses the feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopy.

Presentation of case

A 36-year-old man presented with melena and severe anaemia. An upper endoscopy and abdominal CT scan showed a large gastric fundal submucosal mass of more than 10 cm of diameter close to the superior splenic pole. Because of relapsing bleeding he was submitted to emergency laparoscopy with complete resection of the gastric mass by partial gastrectomy.

Discussion

Laparoscopic approach to GIST larger than 10 cm is still a challenging surgical task and the feasibility depends on multiple factors including the location and size of the lesions. Few series of patients have been described in the literature. This case described a giant GIST with major and relapsing gastrointestinal bleeding that induced an emergency surgically approach with a minimally invasive laparoscopic partial gastric resection.

Conclusions

This report described a case of giant gastric GIST that presented with repeated and severe gastrointestinal bleeding and was treated by emergency laparoscopic gastric resection. The feasibility and advantages of the surgical technique are discussed. The best surgical approach in these rare cases has still to be evaluated on individual basis.

•

Laparoscopic surgical approach for giant gastric GIST is still challenging

•

Emergency surgery for bleeding GIST has not been frequently described

•

Laparoscopic surgical resection of giant gist is feasible but has to be evaluated on an individual basis

Minimally Invasive Approach to Gastric GISTs: Analysis of a Multicenter Robotic and Laparoscopic Experience with Literature Review

Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are most frequently located in the stomach. In the setting of a multidisciplinary approach, surgery represents the best therapeutic option, consisting mainly in a wedge gastric resection. (1) Materials and methods: Between January 2010 to September 2020, 105 patients with a primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GISTs) located in the stomach, underwent surgery at three surgical units. (2) Results: A multi-institutional analysis of minimally invasive series including 81 cases (36 laparoscopic and 45 robotic) from 3 referral centers was performed. Males were 35 (43.2%), the average age was 66.64 years old. ASA score ≥3 was 6 (13.3%) in the RS and 4 (11.1%) in the LS and the average tumor size was 4.4 cm. Most of the procedures were wedge resections (N = 76; 93.8%) and the main operative time was 151 min in the RS and 97 min in the LS. Conversion was necessary in five cases (6.2%). (3) Conclusions: Minimal invasive approaches for gastric GISTs performed in selected patients and experienced centers are safe. A robotic approach represents a useful option, especially for GISTs that are more than 5 cm, even located in unfavorable places.

Giant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach Successfully Treated With Laparoscopic Resection: Case Report and Literature Review

The stomach is the most common site of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), representing 60% to 70% of all GIST tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Gastric GISTs are usually asymptomatic discovered incidentally during endoscopic or radiological investigations. A small percentage may present with melena, hematemesis, and anemia due to recurrent bleeding. We report a case of a giant gastric GIST presented with anemia, that successfully treated with laparoscopic resection.

Small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding in patient with type 1 Neurofibromatosis: Management and laparoscopic treatment. Case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. It may be asymptomatic; nevertheless, gastrointestinal bleeding is the most frequent symptom, due to mucosal erosion. Its poor lymph node metastatic spread makes GIST often suitable of minimally invasive surgical approach. The importance of this study is to increase the awareness among physicians about this condition in particular scenarios as in our case and to stress the role of laparoscopic surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 74-year-old female patient presented to the emergency department with hematemesis, followed by haematochezia and melena. The patient had a medical history of type 1 Neurofibromatosis (NF1). She underwent, after CT scan, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and endoscopic haemostasis. Finally, we performed a laparoscopic resection of a mass of the first jejunal loop. The postoperative period was predominantly uneventful. Pathological examination confirmed a low-risk GIST.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Proximal jejunal GIST may cause an upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. A multidisciplinary team approach is mandatory for the correct management of this disease and its complications (bleeding). GISTs are indicated as the most commonly gastrointestinal NF1 associated tumours. In case of localised and resectable GIST surgical treatment is the mainstay and laparoscopic surgery is a valid alternative.

CONCLUSION

In case of abdominal bleeding mass in a NF1 patient, it is important to keep in mind the well-known association between NF1 and GIST to facilitate the diagnosis and to quickly perform the appropriate treatment. Laparoscopic approach is safe and effective if the oncological radicality is respected.

[Laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of stomach]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of minimally invasive surgical procedures in patients with gastric GIST.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 30 patients aged 52.2±9.8 years. ASA grade II (44%), III (26%) and I (23%) were predominant. Lesion of stomach body was noted in 17 (56%) patients, antrum - in 8 (27%), fundus - in 2 (7%) and cardia - in 3 (10%) patients. GIST was located on the anterior wall of stomach in 56% of patients. Exophytic growth was observed in 16 (53%) patients, endophytic - in 12 (40%), transmural growth - in 2 (7%) cases. T2 grade of tumor was noted in 67% of cases (TNM 8). All patients underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted ('daVinci Si') partial resection of the stomach.

RESULTS

Radical resection (R0) without injury of pseudocapsule of tumor was made in all patients. Laparoscopic procedures were performed in 25 (83%) patients, robot-assisted - in 5 (17%). Early postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo II) were observed in 3 patients. Spindle cell structure of tumors (93%) with low mitotic activity (63%) prevailed. Tumor stage I was observed in 56% of patients. Patients with high mitotic tumor index (44%) were directed to targeted therapy. Recurrence and/or metastasis in long-term period were absent in 26 (87%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery for gastric GIST is safe and characterized by the absence of significant postoperative complications and long-term recurrence-free period. The use of robotic surgical system is effective and justified for anatomically difficult localization of GIST.

Laparoscopic resection is better than endoscopic dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor between 2 and 5 cm in size: a case-matched study in a gastrointestinal center

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of endoscopic dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (gGIST) between 2 and 5 cm in size has been demonstrated. However, its impact on short-term and long-term outcomes, compared with laparoscopic resection, is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic resection and endoscopic dissection for 2-5-cm gGIST.

METHODS

A case-matched study was performed using the propensity score. To overcome selection bias, we performed a 1:1 match using six covariates, including age, sex, BMI, ASA score, tumor size, and tumor location. Short-term and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic resection and endoscopic dissection were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients with 2-5-cm gGIST were enrolled between 2006 and 2017 in our gastrointestinal center. According to the intention-to-treat approach, 165 patients underwent laparoscopic resection, and 45 patients underwent endoscopic dissection. After the propensity score, 45 pairs were balanced and analyzed. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between the laparoscopic and endoscopic groups after matching. The rate of complications was significantly higher in the endoscopic group compared with the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). Perforations occurred in 16 patients in the endoscopic group (16/45, 35.6%). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the endoscopic group compared with the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in disease-free survival or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection is better than endoscopic dissection for 2-5-cm gGIST because of the lower complication rate and shorter hospital stay.

Microscopically Positive Resection Margins in Laparoscopic Gastric GIST Resection May Not Confer a Poorer Prognosis

Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has increased popularity with studies showing good outcomes for patients with tumors <5 cm, with a shorter hospital stay, lower blood loss, and morbidity. Our study aims to audit the clinical profile and surgical outcomes of GISTs, with an evaluation of laparoscopic versus open surgery and the prognostic role of positive R1 margins. In our retrospective study, 62 GIST patients who underwent surgery were included and further analysis was made for the 48 gastric GISTs patients. In total, 33 patients underwent laparoscopic gastric GIST resection, whereas the rest underwent open resection. There was no difference in operative duration but the blood loss was lesser and length of stay shorter in the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic group had a higher incidence of R1 resection but none developed recurrence or metastasis during follow-up. Laparoscopic resection in the management of gastric GISTs resulted in higher R1 resection rates but this did not affect recurrence rates or overall survival.

Laparoscopic Surgery for Large Gastric Submucosal Tumors

BACKGROUND

In general, laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) >5 cm is not recommended. However, there is a lack of evidence to support this recommendation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 108 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for gastric GISTs. Of the 108 patients, 23 had GISTs>5 cm. The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for large gastric GISTs. In addition, we performed a rapid systematic review of laparoscopic surgery for large gastric GISTs.

RESULTS

In our cases, all patients were performed R0 resection without capsular rupture and surgical margins were negative on pathologic examination. In all studies, en bloc resection was achieved without capsular rupture in all patients. The average positive surgical margins rate was 1.6% in total reports.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach for large gastric GISTs>5 cm has been proposed as safe when performed by experienced surgeons.

Minimally invasive surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Minimally invasive surgery has been increasingly performed for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). In this review we discuss and summarize the current evidence on minimally invasive surgery for gastric GISTs. Laparoscopic resection for gastric GIST has been consistently shown to be associated with superior perioperative outcomes with no compromise in oncological outcomes when compared to open resection in numerous retrospective case-control studies. It has also been shown to be safe and feasible for large tumors or tumors located in unfavorable sites. However, to date, there remains a lack of level 1 evidence from prospective randomized control trials in support of laparoscopic resection.

Meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 5 cm

BACKGROUND

Data on the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) larger than 5 cm are limited. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to compared laparoscopic and open resection for gastric GISTs larger than 5 cm.

METHODS

We perform a literature search on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. Review Manage version 5.1 (RevMan 5.1) was used for data analysis. The GRADE profiler software (version 3.6) was used to estimate the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 6 observational studies and one unpublished retrospective cohort study met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis: 203 patients in LAP and 214 patients in OPEN group. The pooled result revealed that laparoscopic resection was associated with a same operative time (WMD = -0.87 min; 95% CI: -47.50 to 47.75; P = 0.97), intraoperative blood loss (WMD = -34.38 ml; 95% CI: -79.60 to 10.84; P = 0.14), overall complications (RR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.12; P = 0.12), better 5-year disease-free survival (HR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.91; P = 0.03) and overall survival (HR = 0.09; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.40; P = 0.002) compared with open resection.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection is a technically and oncologically safe and feasible approach for large-sized gastric GISTs (≥ 5 cm) compared to open resection.

Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Does laparoscopic surgery provide an adequate oncologic resection?

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors of the GI tract. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of non-metastatic disease. However, the ability to provide an adequate oncologic resection using laparoscopic surgery is still an area of debate. This is a thorough review of the current literature, looking particularly at the use of laparoscopic surgery for larger GISTs and the long-term oncologic outcomes compared to the results of open surgery. Laparoscopic resections provide an adequate oncologic result for GISTs of all sizes, including those greater than 5 cm in size.

Evidence mapping based on systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)

Background

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours. Currently, different pharmacological and surgical options are used to treat localised and metastatic GISTs, although this research field is broad and the body of evidence is scattered and expanding. Our objectives are to identify, describe and organise the current available evidence for GIST through an evidence mapping approach.

Methods

We followed the methodology of Global Evidence Mapping (GEM). We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos in order to identify systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analyses published between 1990 and March 2016. Two authors assessed eligibility and extracted data. Methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was assessed using AMSTAR. We organised the results according to identified PICO questions and presented the evidence map in tables and a bubble plot.

Results

A total of 17 SRs met eligibility criteria. These reviews included 66 individual studies, of which three quarters were either observational or uncontrolled clinical trials. Overall, the quality of the included SRs was moderate or high. In total, we extracted 14 PICO questions from them and the corresponding results mostly favoured the intervention arm.

Conclusions

The most common type of study used to evaluate therapeutic interventions in GIST sarcomas has been non-experimental studies. However, the majority of the interventions are reported as beneficial or probably beneficial by the respective authors of SRs. The evidence mapping is a useful and reliable methodology to identify and present the existing evidence about therapeutic interventions.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0402-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastric Resection for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors >5 cm: A Size-Matched and Location-Matched Comparison

This study compared robotic (RR) and laparoscopic resection (LR) for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach >5 cm. Twelve consecutive patients who underwent RR from 2012 to 2015 were matched for tumor size and location with 24 patients who underwent LR from 2000 to 2012. The median tumor size was 7.1 cm (range, 5.5 to 11.5). GISTs were resected by wedge resection (91.7%) or distal gastrectomy. The median RR operative time was longer than that of LR (162.5 vs. 130 min, respectively; P=0.004). Only 1 LR patient required conversion. The time to flatus and hospital stay were similar between groups. Overall, 3 patients developed minor postoperative complications that were medically treated. Mortality was nil. All resections were R0. No difference was observed in the incidence of recurrence. RR was significantly more expensive (+21.6%) than LR. RR appears to be safe and feasible for GISTs>5 cm, but is associated with longer operative times and greater costs.

Laparoscopic wedge resection for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is now widely accepted, but its application for large GISTs remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LWR for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric GISTs.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 82 consecutive patients who underwent attempted LWR for suspected gastric GIST. LWR for large (≥5 cm) (n = 23) tumors was compared with LWR for small (<5 cm) tumors (n = 59). The 23 patients with LWR for large tumors were also compared to 36 consecutive patients who underwent open wedge resection (OWR) for large tumors.

RESULTS

Comparison between patients who underwent LWR for large versus small tumors demonstrated that resection of large tumors was associated with a longer operating time. There was no difference in other perioperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes such as frequency of close margins (≤1 mm) and recurrence-free survival. Comparison between patients who underwent LWR versus OWR for large tumors showed that LWR was associated with decreased median time to fluid or solid diet, shorter postoperative stay but longer operating times. There was no difference in oncological outcomes.

CONCLUSION

LWR for suspected large gastric GIST is feasible and safe. It is associated with similar short-term outcomes with LWR for small tumors and favorable short-term outcomes over OWR for large tumors without compromising on oncological outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic wedge gastrectomy for large gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Although the feasibility of minimally invasive resection of small gastric GISTs is well established, less is known about safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for large tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed, using a prospectively maintained comprehensive database. Patients were divided into two groups according to tumor size: Case group with tumors > 5 cm and control group with tumors <5 cm. Hospital charts were reviewed, and various outcome measures recorded, including operative time, estimated operative blood loss, post-operative leak, stasis, infection and recurrence.

RESULTS

No tumors were ruptured during surgical manipulation and no major morbidity or mortality occurred in either group. Operative time (75,8 ± 33,1 min in large cases vs 75,8 ± 33,1 min in small cases) was similar in both groups (p = 0,61). The incidence of post-operative complications did not differ between the two groups. In details there were 21 out of 25 (84%) uncomplicated cases among small GISTs versus 17 out of 24 (70,8%) uncomplicated cases among large GISTs (p = 0,32).

CONCLUSION

This matched-pair case control study demonstrates that laparoscopic wedge resection for large gastric GISTs is safe and effective, as demonstrated for small tumors.

Our experience with laparoscopic partial gastrectomy by the 'lift-and-cut method' for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with maximal preservation of the remnant stomach

BACKGROUND

Wedge resection is the most commonly used method in laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, this method can involve inadvertent resection of additional gastric tissue and cause gastric deformation. To minimize the volume of resected gastric tissue, we have developed a laparoscopic partial gastrectomy with seromyotomy which we call the 'lift-and-cut method' for gastric GIST. Here, we report a case series of this surgery.

METHOD

First, the seromuscular layer around the tumor is cut. Because the mucosa and submucosa are extensible, the tumor is lifted toward the abdominal cavity. After sufficient lifting, the gastric tissue under the tumor is cut at the submucosal layer with a linear stapler (thus 'lift-and-cut method'). Finally, the defect in the seromuscular layer is closed with a hand-sewn suture.

RESULTS

From April 2011 to December 2015, 28 patients underwent laparoscopic partial gastrectomy by this method at Osaka Red Cross Hospital. Average operation time was 126 min (range 65-302 min) and average blood loss was 10 ml (range 0-200 ml). No intraoperative complications including tumor rupture or postoperative complications regarded as Clavien-Dindo Grade II or higher occurred. All patients took sufficient solid diet at discharge. Median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range 5-21 days). On median follow-up of 26.6 months (range 6-54 months), no recurrence was reported.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy by the lift-and-cut method is safe and simple, and widely applicable for gastric GIST.

Comparison of the post-operative outcomes and survival of laparoscopic versus open resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multi-center prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic resection (LR) is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). The aim of this study is to investigate the short-term outcomes and therapeutic effects of LR compared to open resection (OR) of gastric GISTs.

METHODS

During 2009-2014, a prospective cohort of 200 patients with gastric GISTs indicated for resection underwent LR and OR procedures in three centers in Shanghai. Patient demographics, peri-operative complications, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 176 patients who underwent gastric GIST resections were compared, of which 91 were laparoscopic, 85 were open. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic resection of GIST has shorter operative time (102 vs. 172 min, p < 0.001), lower blood loss (100 vs 144 ml, p < 0.001), and shorter length of stay (9.1 vs. 15.3 d, p < 0.001). No statistical significant difference is observed for time to bowel function or semi-liquid diet, complications, recurrence rates, and mortality.

CONCLUSION

LR is a safe and efficacious treatment for gastric GISTs, providing the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, and shorter length of stay, all without compromising post-operative outcomes and survival.

Laparoscopic versus open gastric wedge resection for primary gastrointestinal tumors: clinical outcomes and health care costs analysis

The study aimed to compare laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) versus open-wedge resections (OWR) for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach. Twenty-five patients who underwent LWR were matched by tumor size and location with 25 patients who underwent OWR. GISTs close to the pylorus or the esophagogastric junction, incidental, and metastatic GISTs were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and histologic variables did not differ between groups. Estimated blood loss, time to flatus, and duration of hospitalization were significantly lower in the LWR group. Overall, 6 patients developed minor postoperative complications that were medically treated. Mortality was nil. No group difference was observed for the incidence of diseases during the follow-up (average, 46.8 mo). The OWR procedure had significantly higher costs (+34%) than the LWR. Both techniques appear safe and oncologically feasible. However, laparoscopy is associated with faster recovery and shorter hospital stay, which reflect advantages in terms of contracted costs for the health care system.

Endoscopically Assisted Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic Gastric Resection for GIST Treatment

PURPOSE

Complete surgical resection with negative margins without lymphadenectomy is the treatment of choice for nonmetastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs). Laparoscopic resection of gastric GISTs <5 cm is an acceptable and oncologically feasible, safe, and effective treatment. We present our experience of an endoscopically assisted minimally invasive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic (SILS) technique for gastric GISTs resection.

METHODS

Four patients with small gastric GISTs ≤5 cm located on the greater curvature or the anterior wall were resected with SILS by using a lesion-lifting technique under the guidance of flexible gastroscopy.

RESULTS

The technique was feasible and safe and offered significant advantages in locating the tumor and controlling the resection margins. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications, conversions, or tumor ruptures. Pathology showed low-risk GISTs resected with disease-free margins without tumor rupture. No recurrences have been observed.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopically assisted SILS wedge gastrectomy is a feasible, safe, and advantageous technique for the treatment of the greater curvature or anterior wall gastric GISTs.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: What Is the Impact on Postoperative Outcome and Oncologic Results?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare the postoperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs).

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of the laparoscopic approach for gGIST resection has been demonstrated; however, its impact on outcomes, particularly its oncologic safety for tumors greater than 5 cm, remains unknown.

METHODS

Among 1413 patients treated for a GIST in 61 European centers between 2001 and 2013, patients who underwent primary resection for a gGIST smaller than 20 cm (N = 666), by either laparoscopy (group L, n = 282) or open surgery (group O, n = 384), were compared. Multivariable analyses and propensity score matching were used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality and morbidity rates in groups L and O were 0.4% versus 2.1% (P = 0.086) and 11.3% vs 19.5% (P = 0.004), respectively. Laparoscopic resection was independently protective against in-hospital morbidity (odds ratio 0.54, P = 0.014). The rate of R0 resection was 95.7% in group L and 92.7% in group O (P = 0.103). After 1:1 propensity score matching (n = 224), the groups were comparable according to age, sex, tumor location and size, mitotic index, American Society of Anesthesiology score, and the extent of surgical resection. After adjustment for BMI, overall morbidity (10.3% vs 19.6%; P = 0.005), surgical morbidity (4.9% vs 9.8%; P = 0.048), and medical morbidity (6.2% vs 13.4%; P = 0.01) were significantly lower in group L. Five-year recurrence-free survival was significantly better in group L (91.7% vs 85.2%; P = 0.011). In tumors greater than 5 cm, in-hospital morbidity and 5-year recurrence-free survival were similar between the groups (P = 0.255 and P = 0.423, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection for gGISTs is associated with favorable short-term outcomes without compromising oncologic results.

Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs larger than 5 cm: Results from a prospective study

The role of laparoscopic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), particularly those >5 cm, remains under debate due the possibility of intraoperative tumor rupture. To determine the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of large gastric GISTs, a prospective study was performed between March 2011 and March 2014. Intraoperative tumor rupture was studied as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the conversion rate, surgical duration, estimated blood loss, time to tolerate fluid and solid diets, length of post-operative hospital stay and recurrence rate at the end of the follow-up. A total of 16 patients were included in this study, with a tumor size of 7.04±1.53 cm (range, 5.2-10.8 cm). No intraoperative tumor rupture occurred. The median duration of surgery was 88.1±31.9 min, with an estimated blood loss volume of 37.1±18.7 ml. No patient required a blood transfusion. The mean time until the start of oral intake for fluid and solid diets was 1.1±0.6 and 2.5±0.9 days, respectively. The median length of post-operative hospital stay was 5.4±5.8 days. The follow-up period for all patients was 16.9±11.2 months (range, 2-38 months). No local or distant recurrence was observed. The study indicates that laparoscopic resection for large gastric GISTs is feasible and safe. Laparoscopic surgery should be considered as the standard approach in all cases, irrespective of tumor size or location.

Laparoscopic removal of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of uncinate process of pancreas

The pancreas is an extremely rare location for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). We present a case of a patient with a GIST located in the uncinate process of the pancreas that was treated successfully with a laparoscopic technique. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and scintigraphy suggested a neuroendocrine tumor. Due to the fact that the image suggested a neuroendocrine tumor with a diameter below 2 cm, the patient was qualified for a laparoscopic procedure of tumor enucleation. Postoperative care proceeded in accordance with the principles of the ERAS concept. The postoperative course was uncomplicated. He was discharged home on the second postoperative day. In the obtained histopathology result a GIST was found. During a 6-month observation, including control computed tomography examination, no signs of tumor progression were found. Despite the fact that stromal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract localized in the pancreas are very rare, they should be considered in the differential diagnosis of tumors of this organ.

[Spectrum of laparoscopic surgery for gastric tumors]

Minimally invasive operative procedures are increasingly being used for treating tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract. While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become established as a standard procedure for benign tumors and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) based on current studies, the significance of MIS in the field of gastric cancer is the topic of heated debate. Until now the majority of studies and meta-analyses on gastric cancer have come from Asia and these indicate the advantages of MIS in terms of intraoperative blood loss, minor surgical complications and swifter convalescence although without any benefits in terms of long-term oncological results and quality of life. Unlike in Germany, gastric cancer in Asia with its unchanged high incidence rate, 50 % frequency of early carcinoma and predominantly distal tumor localization is treated at high-volume centres. Due to the proven marginal advantages of MIS over open resection described in the published studies no general recommendation for laparoscopic surgery of gastric cancer can currently be given.

Outcome after laparoscopic versus open wedge resection for suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A matched-pair case-control study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been shown by several retrospective studies to be technically feasible and associated with favorable outcomes when compared to the open approach. This study aims to mitigate potential selection bias by performing a case control study of laparoscopic (LWR) versus open wedge resection (OWR) matched by resection type, location and tumor size.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 50 consecutive patients who underwent LWR for a suspected gastric GIST from a prospective database and matched this cohort with 50 patients who underwent OWR.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between the key baseline clinicopathological features of patients' who underwent LWR versus OWR. Patients who underwent LWR had longer operating times [150 (range, 65-270) minutes vs 92.5 (25-200) minutes, P < .001] but decreased median blood loss [0 (0-300) ml vs 0 (0-1200) ml, P = .015], decreased frequency of intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion [1 (2%) vs 8 (16%), P = .031], decreased median time to liquid diet [2 (0-5) vs 3 (1-7) days, P < .001], decreased median time to solid diet [3 (1-6) vs 5 (2-11) days, P < .001] and decreased postoperative stay [4 (2-10) vs 4.5 (3-17), P < .001] compared to OWR. There was no difference in oncological outcomes such as frequency of close margins (≤ 1 mm) and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSION

This matched case-control study provides supporting evidence that LWR results in superior perioperative outcomes compared to OWR without compromising on oncological outcomes.

Laparoscopic Surgery In The Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are rare neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. These lesions are characterized by different levels of malignancy. Only radical surgery offers a chance of curing the disease. The aim of this study is to present the results of gastrointestinal stromal tumor treatment with minimally invasive surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study group included 27 patients operated laparoscopically on for gastrointestinal stromal tumor with laparoscopic surgery between September 2009 and December 2013. The most common location of the tumor was the stomach (21 patients, 77.8%) and the small intestine (4 patients, 14.8%). We analyzed early surgery results, the number and character of complications, lengths of hospital stays, histological types of the removed tumors, and long-term results of treatment.

RESULTS

There was no need for conversion to open surgery in any patient from the study group. Post-surgery complications occurred in 2 patients (7.4%). The median duration of the hospital stay was 4.5 days; none of the patients had to be readmitted to the hospital in the first 30 days after the procedure. In 26 out of 27 patients, microscopic examination confirmed the radicality of the surgical procedure (R0 resection). The mean size of the removed lesions was 4.1 cm. Using the Joensuu malignancy classification model, it was established that in 6 (22.2%) patients gastrointestinal stromal tumor was characterized by a very low level of malignancy, in 11 patients (40.7%) a low level, in 4 (14.9%) a medium level, and in 6 (22.2%) a high level. The average duration of follow-up was 13 months. During the observation period, there was no recurrence of the disease.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors is possible and allows for satisfactory results both in terms of the postoperative course and the oncological quality of the procedure.

Laparoscopic approach to gastrointestinal malignancies: toward the future with caution

After the rapid acceptance of laparoscopy to manage multiple benign diseases arising from gastrointestinal districts, some surgeons started to treat malignancies by the same way. However, if the limits of laparoscopy for benign diseases are mainly represented by technical issues, oncologic outcomes remain the foundation of any procedures to cure malignancies. Cancerous patients represent an important group with peculiar aspects including reduced survival expectancy, worsened quality of life due to surgery itself and adjuvant therapies, and challenging psychological impact. All these issues could, potentially, receive a better management with a laparoscopic surgical approach. In order to confirm such aspects, similarly to testing the newest weapons (surgical or pharmacologic) against cancer, long-term follow-up is always recommendable to assess the real benefits in terms of overall survival, cancer-free survival and quality of life. Furthermore, it seems of crucial importance that surgeons will be correctly trained in specific oncologic principles of surgical oncology as well as in modern miniinvasive technologies. Therefore, laparoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies requires more caution and deep analysis of published evidences, as compared to those achieved for inflammatory bowel diseases, gastroesophageal reflux disease or diverticular disease. This review tries to examine the evidence available to date for the use of laparoscopy and robotics in malignancies arising from the gastrointestinal district.