Readmission and Reoperation After Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse:

Unveiling the depths of pelvic organ prolapse: From risk factors to therapeutic methods (Review)

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a condition where one or more pelvic organs (such as the uterus, bladder and rectum) descend from their normal anatomical positions into the vagina, primarily due to the weakening of the pelvic floor support structures. While not life-threatening, POP can substantially diminish the patient's quality of life and lead to serious social and psychological complications. Researchers have explored novel directions regarding the etiology, mechanism and treatment of POP. However, existing literature on the subject often lacks comprehensive and systematic overviews. To address this gap and enhance researchers' understanding of POP, the present study reviewed the risk factors and molecular mechanisms of POP [including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of MMPs, transforming growth factor β, advanced glycation end products (AGEs)/receptor for AGE, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B, fibulin, lysyl oxidase-like 1, homeobox A11, collagen α-1 (XVIII) chain, Wnt signaling pathways and estrogen receptor α], as well as therapeutic approaches, such as lifestyle interventions, physical methods, pharmacotherapy, stem cell transplantation and surgical techniques. The present review aims to provide new insights for future research and contribute to the advancement of diagnosis and treatment strategies for POP.

Comparison between fascia lata and rectus fascia in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this systematic review is to present and compare results from studies that have been using autologous tissue for POP repair.

METHODS

Systematic review was done according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. We aimed to retrieve reports of published and ongoing studies on the efficacy and safety of autologous tissue in vaginal vault prolapse repair. The databases searched were MEDLINE (PubMed interface), Scopus, Cohrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov.

RESULTS

The success rate varied among studies. In fascia-lata group success rate reports varied from 83 to a 100%, with a median follow-up from 12 to 52 months among studies. Rectus fascia reported success rates from 87 to a 100% with a follow-up of 12 months to longest of 98 months.

CONCLUSION

Autologous tissues show satisfying outcomes in terms of safety and efficacy. Sacrocolpopexy procedure with fascia lata has better outcome in term of treatment of prolapse. Harvesting place on lateral side of buttock has more complications in comparison with rectus fascia but size of the graft can be wider in fascia-lata group.

Healthcare Resource Utilization Following Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: Impact of Concomitant Rectopexy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Combined surgical procedures with sacrocolpopexy (SCP) and rectopexy (RP) are more commonly being performed for treatment of multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) within 6 weeks following combined surgery (SCP-RP) versus SCP alone (SCP-only). We hypothesized that concomitant RP does not impact HRU.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent minimally invasive SCP from 2017 to 2022 was conducted at a tertiary referral center. Patients were grouped based on the performance of concomitant RP. HRU was defined as a composite of unscheduled office visits, emergency department visits, and readmissions before the 6-week postoperative visit. HRU was compared in the SCP-RP and SCP-only groups. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with HRU.

RESULTS

There were 144 patients in the SCP-RP group and 405 patients in the SCP-only group. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups, with the following exceptions: the SCP-RP group was older, more likely to have comorbid conditions, and live >60 miles from the hospital. Of the 549 patients, 183 (33.3%) had ≥1 HRU encounter within 6 weeks after surgery. However, there was no difference between the SCP-RP and SCP-only groups in composite HRU (34.0% vs 33.1%, p = 0.84). The most common reasons for HRU were pain, urinary tract infection symptoms, and wound issues. Concomitant mid-urethral sling was associated with a two-fold increased risk of HRU after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

One in 3 patients undergoing minimally invasive SCP had at least one unanticipated encounter within 6 weeks after surgery. Concomitant RP was not associated with increased postoperative HRU.

Effects of Obesity on Urogynecologic Prolapse Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature on outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in patients from various body mass index (BMI) categories to determine the association between obesity and surgical outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to April 12, 2022; ClinicalTrials.gov was searched in September 2022 (PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022326255). Randomized and nonrandomized studies of urogynecologic POP surgery outcomes were accepted in which categories of BMI or obesity were compared.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

In total, 9,037 abstracts were screened; 759 abstracts were identified for full-text screening, and 31 articles were accepted for inclusion and data were extracted.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Studies were extracted for participant information, intervention, comparator, and outcomes, including subjective outcomes, objective outcomes, and complications. Outcomes were compared among obesity categories (eg, BMI 30-34.9, 35-40, higher than 40), and meta-analysis was performed among different surgical approaches. Individual studies reported varying results as to whether obesity affects surgical outcomes. By meta-analysis, obesity (BMI 30 or higher) is associated with an increased odds of objective prolapse recurrence after vaginal prolapse repair (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% CI, 1.14-1.67) and after prolapse repair from any surgical approach (OR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.12-1.53) and with complications such as mesh exposure after both vaginal and laparoscopic POP repair (OR 2.10, 95% CI, 1.01-4.39).

CONCLUSION

Obesity is associated with increased likelihood of prolapse recurrence and mesh complications after POP repair.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022326255.

Rates and Causes of Readmission Within 60 Days Following Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION

Unplanned readmissions are frequent, costly, and perhaps avoidable. We aim to identify the rate, causes, and predictive factors of hospital readmission after hysterectomy within 60 days post-discharge at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH).

METHODS

Retrospective record review of all patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign and malignant conditions from January 2017 to December 2022. Patients were evaluated for demographics, comorbidities, and causes for readmission.

RESULTS

Of 117 patients, the unplanned readmission rate was 9.4% and 7.7% for benign and malignant conditions, respectively. Infections (25%) and abdominal pain (20%) were common causes. Patients with increased intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.013) and cancer patients (0.044) had an increased risk for readmission. Readmitted patients had significantly higher baseline health burdens when compared to non-readmitted patients using the American Society of Anesthesiology scores (ASA) (p = 0.011) and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The 60-day readmission rate after a hysterectomy was 17.1%. Infections and abdominal pain represented common causes. Malignancy and increased intraoperative blood loss are significant risk factors. In order to decrease the readmission rate, addressing common reasons may be beneficial.

Adverse outcomes after minimally invasive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women 65 years and older in the United States

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To describe complications at the time of surgery, 90-day readmission and 1-year reoperation rates after minimally invasive pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women > 65 years of age in the US using Medicare 5% Limited Data Set (LDS) Files.

METHODS

Medicare is a federally funded insurance program in the US for individuals 65 and older. Currently, 98% of individuals over the age of 65 in the US are covered by Medicare. We identified women undergoing minimally invasive POP surgery, defined as laparoscopic or vaginal surgery, in the inpatient and outpatient settings from 2011-2017. Patient and surgical characteristics as well as adverse events were abstracted. We used logistic regression for complications at index surgery and Cox proportional hazards regression models for time to readmission and time to reoperations.

RESULTS

A total of 11,779 women met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 72 (SD ± 8) years; the majority were White (91%). Most procedures were vaginal (76%) and did not include hysterectomy (68%). The rate of complications was 12%; vaginal hysterectomy (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 2.2-2.7) was the factor most strongly associated with increased odds of complications. The 90-day readmission rate was 7.3%. The most common reason for readmission was infection (2.0%), three quarters of which were urinary tract infections. Medicaid eligibility (aHR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8) and concurrent sling procedures (aHR 1.2, 95% CI 1.04-1.4) were associated with a higher risk of 90-day readmission. The 1-year reoperation rate was 4.5%. The most common type of reoperation was a sling procedure (1.8%). Obliterative POP surgery (aHR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9) was associated with a lower risk of reoperation than other types of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

US women 65 years and older who are also eligible to receive Medicaid are at higher risk of 90-day readmission following minimally invasive surgery for POP with the most common reason for readmission being UTI.

Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pelvic reconstructive surgery is becoming increasingly common; however, data on readmission and emergency department visits within 30 days of surgery are limited.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to report the risk factors for 30-day readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included all minimally invasive urogynecologic prolapse procedures with and without concomitant hysterectomy performed within a large managed healthcare organization of 4.5 million members from 2008 to 2018. We queried the system-wide medical record for current procedural terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or Tenth Revision codes for all included procedures and patient demographic and perioperative data. Our primary outcome was 30-day hospital readmission, and our secondary outcome was 30-day emergency department visits. Risk factors including demographics, surgical approach, and characteristics for 30-day outcomes were examined using odds ratios and chi-square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Of the 13,445 patients undergoing prolapse surgery, 6171 patients underwent concomitant hysterectomy whereas 7274 did not. Readmission within 30 days was 2.1% for those with and 1.5% for those without a concomitant hysterectomy. Emergency department visit within 30 days was 9.5% in those with and 9.2% in those without a concomitant hysterectomy. Concomitant hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.81) was associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission. There was no difference in risk of 30-day readmission when comparing the various approaches to hysterectomy. When compared with patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy, undergoing a sacrospinous ligament suspension increased the risk (adjusted odds ratio, 2.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-4.70) of 30-day readmission, while undergoing uterosacral ligament suspension (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.63) or colpocleisis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-5.24) did not in the concomitant hysterectomy subgroup, when compared with patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy, there was no difference in the risk of 30-day readmission for sacrospinous ligament suspension (adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-3.34), uterosacral ligament suspension (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-3.34) or colpocleisis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-4.02). Similarly, sacrocolpopexy was not associated with an increased risk of emergency department visits in either subgroup. For those who had a concomitant hysterectomy, the patient factors that were associated with an increased 30-day readmission risk were hypertension (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.31; P=.03) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.81; P<.01). For those whose prolapse procedure did not include concomitant hysterectomy, the patient factors that were associated with an increased 30-day readmission risk were age (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.07; P<.01) and heart failure (odds ratio, 3.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-6.33; P<.01).

CONCLUSION

In women undergoing minimally invasive pelvic organ prolapse surgery, sacrocolpopexy was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission and emergency department visits. Clinicians may consider surgical approach and other factors when counseling patients about their risks after minimally invasive pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Surgical approach and unplanned readmission following pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (NSQIP)

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To define the reasons for hospital readmissions following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse by surgical approach.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse from 2012 to 2018 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes. Hazard risks of readmission by surgical approach (vaginal, laparoscopic, abdominal, or combined) were determined by multivariable cox regression. Diagnoses and timing of readmission by surgical approach were examined.

RESULTS

Of 57,233 women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse during the study period, 1073 (1.9%) were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days postoperatively. After adjusting for prespecified potential confounders, laparoscopic and abdominal surgical approaches were associated with higher risks of readmission relative to a vaginal approach (aHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08-1.57, and 1.97, 95% CI 1.44-2.71, respectively). The most common reason for readmission was a gastrointestinal issue among those undergoing both laparoscopic (28.0%) and abdominal surgery (30.2%). Surgical site infection was the most common readmission diagnosis among women undergoing vaginal surgery (16.2%). Of the 418 women readmitted within 7 days of surgery, the most common diagnoses were gastrointestinal issues (26.6%), medical disorders (12.0%), or surgical complications (e.g., bleeding) (11.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Women undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse were at higher risk of readmission relative to those undergoing surgery via a vaginal approach. The reasons and timing of readmission differed based on surgical approach.

30-Day unanticipated healthcare encounters after prolapse surgery: impact of same day discharge

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge is becoming increasingly common in gynecologic surgery; however, data are limited for frequency, setting, and severity of unanticipated healthcare visits for women who are discharged on the day of surgery after major prolapse repair.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether discharge on the day of surgery is associated with increased 30-day unanticipated healthcare encounters after major pelvic organ prolapse surgery compared with discharge on or after postoperative day 1.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of women who underwent pelvic organ prolapse surgery by 8 female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery surgeons from January 2016 to October 2017. Unanticipated healthcare encounter was a composite variable of any visit to the office, emergency department, or hospital readmission. Number of visits, visit diagnoses, and complication severity (Clavien-Dindo classification) were compared by day of discharge with the use of χ2 tests. Multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 405 women, 258 (63.7%) were discharged on the day of surgery, and 147 (36.3%) were discharged on postoperative day 1 or later. Mean age was 66±11 years, body mass index was 27.9±4.8 kg/m². Most had stage III prolapse (n=273; 67.4%). Procedures included laparoscopic or robotic sacrocolpopexy, (n=163; 40.2%), vaginal apical suspensions (n=115; 28.4%), obliterative (n=105; 25.9%), and concomitant hysterectomy (n=229; 56.5%). There was no increase in the number of women with at least 1 unanticipated healthcare encounter within 30 days of surgery, based on discharge on the day of surgery compared with postoperative day 1 (24.0% vs 26.5%; P=.572). The majority of visits occurred in the office (17.8% vs 19.0%; P=.760). There was no increase in 30-day readmissions (3.5% vs 4.8%; P=.527). The most common visit diagnosis was pain and accounted for 31.5% of all visits, followed by urologic and gastrointestinal symptoms. Diagnoses and complication severity did not vary by day of discharge, except that women who were discharged on the day of surgery were more likely to have a superficial wound separation (11.3% vs 0%; P=.011) and less likely to experience grade II complications (7.4% vs 15.6%, P=.009). Few women had >1 unscheduled visit, and rates were similar between the 2 groups (6.2% vs 6.8%; P=.810). On multivariable regression, younger women (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.05), those with lower body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.01), and higher initial postanesthesia recovery unit pain scores (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.21) were more likely to have an unanticipated healthcare encounter. Pain complaints were evaluated most often in the office compared with the emergency department (41.1% vs 13.0%); medical complications such as cardiac (15.6% vs 0%) and respiratory (6.5% vs 0%) were more likely to be evaluated in the emergency department. Higher grade complications (II/III) were more likely to visit the emergence department (78.2% vs 27.1%; P<.0001).

CONCLUSION

Same-day discharge after prolapse surgery did not result in an increase in 30-day unanticipated healthcare encounters.

Complications and reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse, impact of hysterectomy, surgical approach and surgeon experience

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is associated with specific complications. Our primary objective was to assess the recurrence requiring reoperation after prolapse surgery, and our secondary objectives were to assess the early complications and secondary surgery for urinary incontinence.

METHODS

Retrospective study of a population-based cohort of all hospital or outpatient stays including POP surgery from 2008 to 2014, using the French nationwide discharge summary database. We calculated the rates of hospital readmission following surgery as well as the rates of reoperation for recurrent prolapse and subsequent procedures performed for urinary incontinence.

RESULTS

A total of 310,938 patients had undergone surgery for POP. Two hundred fourteen (0.07%) patients died, and 0.45% were admitted to an intensive care unit; 4.4% of the patients underwent surgery for the recurrence of prolapse. Concomitant hysterectomy in the first surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of POP surgery recurrence: (hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.51 [0.49; 0.53]). A total of 1386 (2.5%) patients were readmitted to the hospital for early (30-day) complications of prolapse surgery. The most frequent reasons for early readmission were local infection (32.8%), hemorrhage (21.4%) and pain (17.2%). Risk factors for complications were obesity, hospitals with low levels of activity and associated incontinence surgery; 4.6% of the patients required secondary surgery for urinary incontinence; obesity was a risk factor (HR [95% CI] = 1.12 [1.01; 1.24]), and the vaginal route was a protective factor (odds ratio = 1.86 for laparoscopy, 1.44 for laparotomy and 1.25 for multiple approaches).

CONCLUSIONS

POP surgery is associated with low rates of complication and recurrence. Complications occurred most commonly following combined surgeries for both prolapse and incontinence and in hospitals with low surgical volumes. Concomitant hysterectomy appears to be protective for the need for additional prolapse surgery, and the vaginal route leads to a lower frequency of secondary surgery for urinary incontinence.

Modified Extraperitoneal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Preventing Cuff Prolapse Risk after Vaginal Hysterectomy; 4 Clamp Method

Objectives: The extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (ULS) can be performed during the removal of the uterus in vaginal hysterectomy to prevent cuff prolapse. In this study, we evaluated the modified extraperitoneal ULS technique in terms of preventing cuff prolapse. Methods/Technique: Forty patients with second and third-stage uterine prolapse who were operated were included in the study. During routine vaginal hysterectomy procedure performed on patients, after sacrouterine ligaments which are the first-bites and uteroovarian and round ligaments which are the last-bites have been sutured and knotted, these ligaments were marked with 4-distinct clamps to make the right and left, upper and lower separation. After vaginal cuff was closed the sutures hanged by the clamps were ligated together, and the cuff tissue was stretched to the apical line. Results: According to the POP-Q classification, 22 patients with stage-2 and 18 patients with stage-3 prolapse were operated. During the 2-year follow-up; 4 patients could not be reached and were excluded from follow-up. Five of the remaining 36 patients (13.8%) found to have stage-1 cuff prolapse and 31 (86.1%) of patients had no prolapse. There was no significant decrease in postoperative vaginal length (p [Formula: see text] 0.05). The PISQ-12 sexual function scores was found similar before and after surgery (p [Formula: see text] 0.05). Conclusions: The extraperitoneal ULS is a successful method to prevent cuff prolapse after hysterectomy. Although there are various modified forms of this method, the modified ULS, which we have described as the 4-clamp method, seems to be successful in terms of initial results.

Long-term experience of vaginal vault prolapse prevention at hysterectomy time by modified McCall culdoplasty or Shull suspension: Clinical, sexual and quality of life assessment after surgical intervention

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of modified McCall culdoplasty or Shull suspension in preventing vaginal vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy and the long-term impact on quality of life and sexual function.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis in 414 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and vaginal suspension through modified McCall culdoplasty (group A) or Shull suspension (group B) was evaluated. Clinical features and concomitant surgical procedures were assessed. Surgical data and perioperative and postoperative complications have also been analyzed. Clinical characteristics, urinary symptoms, POP-Q score classification, Quality of Life and Sexual Function were evaluated at baseline and at median follow up with P-QoL, ICIQ-UI-SF, PISQ-12, FSFI, FSDS questionnaires.

RESULTS

The median follow up was 8.9 year (5.1-14.2 years). 200 women in group A and 214 in group B were evaluated. Vaginal vault prolapse occurred in 2 patients in group A and in 2 patients in group B. POP-Q score for all compartments showed a significant (p < 0.001) decrease for both groups without significant differences between the 2 groups. The total vaginal length (TVL) was reduced in greater proportion in McCall group (p < 0.001). P-QoL and ICIQ-UI-SF questionnaires documented an improvement for both groups (p < 0.001). The number of patients who regularly practice sexual activity increased in both groups, but patients in group B experienced a better quality of sexual life evaluated with PISQ-12 and FSFI.

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical techniques showed effectiveness and safety in preventing vaginal vault prolapse in women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy, with a significant improvement in quality of life and sexuality. Shull technique demonstrated greater improvement in sexual function.