Augmented renal clearance in non–critically ill abdominal and trauma surgery patients is an underestimated phenomenon: A point prevalence study

Optimize Vancomycin Dose in Surgical Ward Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance Determined by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equation

Background

In the field of postoperative care, infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria pose a major clinical challenge. Vancomycin is a key therapeutic agent whose efficacy is greatly influenced by renal function, particularly by augmented renal clearance (ARC). The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is an easy and commonly used method to predict ARC; however, it is not well studied to determine vancomycin dose. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of the CKD-EPI equation in determining ARC and optimizing the dose of vancomycin for surgical ward patients.

Methodology

A retrospective observational study was conducted to examine 158 surgical ward patients receiving vancomycin. Data on demographics, medical history, and vancomycin dosing were collected. Renal function was evaluated using the CKD-EPI equation, with ARC defined as eGFR ≥ 96.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics were calculated using the ClinCalc tool.

Results

ARC was in 54% of the patients. Compared with patients without ARC, those with ARC were younger and had lower serum creatinine levels. They also required higher vancomycin doses but had lower trough concentrations and 24-hour area-under-the-curve values. A significant correlation was observed between eGFR and vancomycin clearance, with eGFR > 96.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 necessitating higher vancomycin doses (>45 mg/kg/day) to achieve the desired area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio.

Conclusion

For surgical ward patients with CKD-EPI eGFR ≥ 96.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, a vancomycin dosage of >45 mg/kg/day may be recommended to reach effective therapeutic levels. Overall, this study emphasizes the importance of tailoring vancomycin therapy depending on renal function to ensure efficacy and mitigate the risk of antimicrobial resistance in surgical ward patients.

Association between Augmented Renal Clearance and Inadequate Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Targets in Chinese Adult Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

This study aimed to examine the risk factors of augmented renal clearance (ARC) and the association between ARC and vancomycin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices in Chinese adult patients. A prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted, and 414 adult patients undergoing vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were enrolled. Clinical and PK/PD data were compared between ARC and non-ARC groups. Independent risk factors were examined using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. The ARC and augmented renal clearance in trauma intensive care (ARCTIC) scoring systems were evaluated. Eighty-eight of the enrolled patients (88/414, 21.3%) had ARC before vancomycin therapy. Patients with ARC were more likely to have subtherapeutic vancomycin PK/PD indices, including trough concentration (p = 0.003) and 24 h area under the concentration−time curve (AUC24) to minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio (p < 0.001). Male sex (OR = 2.588), age < 50 years (OR = 2.713), overweight (OR = 2.072), receiving mechanical ventilation (OR = 1.785), enteral nutrition (OR = 2.317), neutrophil percentage (OR = 0.975), and cardiovascular diseases (OR = 0.281) were significantly associated with ARC. In conclusion, ARC is associated with subtherapeutic vancomycin trough concentration and AUC24/MIC; therefore, higher than routine doses may be needed. Risk factors and ARC risk scoring systems are valuable for early identification.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Augmented Renal Clearance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kidney function assessment in the critically ill overlooks the possibility for hyperfunctioning kidneys, known as augmented renal clearance (ARC), which could contribute to therapeutic failures in the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this research is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors of ARC in the critically ill. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global databases were searched on 27 October 2020. We included studies conducted in critically ill adults who reported the prevalence and/or risk factors of ARC. We evaluated study quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool. Case reports, reviews, editorials and commentaries were excluded. We generated a random-effects meta-analytic model using the inverse variance method and visualized the pooled estimates using forest plots. Seventy studies were included. The pooled prevalence (95% CI) was 39% (34.9–43.3). Prevalence for neuro, trauma, mixed and sepsis ICUs were 74 (55–87), 58 (48–67), 36 (31–41) and 33 (21–48), respectively. Age, male sex and trauma were associated with ARC with pooled OR (95% CI) of 0.95 (0.93–0.96), 2.36 (1.28–4.36), 2.60 (1.21–5.58), respectively. Limitations included variations in ARC definition, inclusion and exclusion criteria and studies design. In conclusion, ARC is prevalent in critically ill patients, especially those in the neurocritical care and trauma ICU population. Young age, male sex and trauma are risk factors for ARC in those with apparently normal renal function. Further research on optimal dosing of drugs in the setting of ARC is warranted. (Prospero registration: CRD42021246417).

The Development of a Juvenile Porcine Augmented Renal Clearance Model Through Continuous Infusion of Lipopolysaccharides: An Exploratory Study

Augmented renal clearance (ARC) as observed in the critically ill (pediatric) population can have a major impact on the pharmacokinetics and posology of renally excreted drugs. Although sepsis has been described as a major trigger in the development of ARC in human critically ill patients, mechanistic insights on ARC are currently lacking. An appropriate ARC animal model could contribute to reveal these underlying mechanisms. In this exploratory study, a state of ARC was induced in 8-week-old piglets. Conscious piglets were continuously infused over 36 h with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from Escherichia coli (O111:B4) to induce sepsis and subsequently trigger ARC. To study the dose-dependent effect of LPS on the renal function, three different doses (0.75, 2.0, 5.0 μg/kg/h) were administered (two ♂ piglets/dose, one sham piglet), in combination with fluid administration (0.9% NaCl) at 6 ml/kg/h. Single boluses of renal markers, i.e., creatinine [40 mg/kg body weight (BW)], iohexol (64.7 mg/kg BW), and para-aminohippuric acid (PAH, 10 mg/kg BW) were administered intravenously to evaluate the effect of LPS on the renal function. Clinical parameters were monitored periodically. Blood sampling was performed to determine the effect on hematology, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and prostaglandin E₂ plasma levels. All piglets that were continuously infused with LPS displayed an elevated body temperature, heart rhythm, and respiratory rate ~1-3 h after start of the infusion. After infusion, considerably higher total body clearances of iohexol, creatinine, and PAH were observed, independent of the administration of LPS and/or its dose. Since also the sham piglet, receiving no LPS, demonstrated a comparable increase in renal function, the contribution of fluid administration to the development of ARC should be further evaluated.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients With Augmented Renal Clearance

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether established ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) dosing is adequate for patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) and bacterial infection.

METHODS

ARC (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 130 mL/min) was confirmed by directly measured CrCl in 11 critically ill patients in a phase 1 pharmacokinetics study. Patients received 3 g C/T (ceftolozane 2 g/tazobactam 1 g) as a 60-minute intravenous infusion. Pharmacokinetic sampling occurred at 0 (predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the start of the infusion. Noncompartmental analyses were conducted on concentration data. The following pharmacodynamic targets were evaluated: time that free (unbound) drug concentrations exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) of 4 μg/mL for ceftolozane and time that the unbound concentration exceeded the 1 μg/mL target threshold (fT>threshold = 1 µg/mL) for > 20% of the dosing interval for tazobactam. Safety was evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity, clearance and volume of distribution at steady state (V_ss) were 236 (118) h*µg/mL, 10.4 (4.5) L/h and 30.8 (10.8) L, respectively, for ceftolozane; and 35.5 (18.5) h*µg/mL, 35.3 (16.5) L/h and 54.8 (20.1) L, respectively, for tazobactam. Clearance and V_ss were higher for both ceftolozane and tazobactam in patients with ARC compared with healthy individuals. The mean estimated ceftolozane fT>MIC at 4 µg/mL was 86.4%; the mean estimated tazobactam fT>threshold = 1 µg/mL was 54.9%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ARC, a 3 g C/T dose met respective pharmacodynamic targets for ceftolozane and tazobactam. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02387372.

Impact of duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on development of fracture-related infection in open fractures

INTRODUCTION

Infection is a common complication of open fractures potentially leading to nonunion, functional loss, and even amputation. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is standard practice for infection prevention in the management of open fractures. However, optimal duration of PAP remains controversial. The objectives were to assess whether PAP duration is independently associated with infection in open fractures and if administration of PAP beyond the commonly-recommended limit of 72 h has any effect on the infection rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 14-year period from 2003 to 2017, 530 skeletally-mature patients with operatively-treated, non-pathologic, long-bone open fractures were treated at one institution. Twenty-eight patients were excluded because of death or loss to follow-up and the remaining 502 patients (with 559 open fractures) who completed a 24-month follow-up were included in this retrospective study. The outcome was fracture-related infection (FRI), defined by the criteria of a recent consensus definition. A logistic generalized estimating equations regression model was conducted, including PAP duration and variables selected by a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method, to assess the association between PAP duration and FRI. Propensity score analysis using a 72-h cut-off was performed to further cope with confounding.

RESULTS

PAP duration, adjusted for the LASSO selected predictors, was independently associated with FRI (OR: 1.11 [95%CI, 1.04-1.19] for every one-day increase in PAP duration, p = 0.003). PAP duration longer than 72 h did not significantly increase the odds for FRI compared to shorter durations (p = 0.06, analysis adjusted for propensity score).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no evidence that administration of prophylactic antibiotics beyond 72 h in patients with long-bone open fractures is warranted. Analyses adjusted for known confounders even revealed a higher risk for FRI for longer PAP. However, this effect cannot necessarily be considered as causal and further research is needed.

Unraveling the Contribution of Fluid Therapy to the Development of Augmented Renal Clearance in a Piglet Model

Augmented renal clearance (ARC) observed in the critically ill pediatric population has received an increased attention over the last years due to its major impact on the disposition and pharmacokinetics of mainly renally excreted drugs. Apart from an important inflammatory trigger, fluid administration has been suggested to contribute to the development of ARC. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of continuous intravenous fluid administration on renal function using a conventional piglet animal model and to quantify the impact of fluid administration on the pharmacokinetics of renally excreted drugs. At baseline, twenty-four piglets (12 treatment/12 control; 7 weeks old, all ♂) received the marker drugs iohexol (64.7 mg/kg body weight (BW)) and para-aminohippuric acid (10 mg/kg BW) to quantify glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow, respectively. In addition, the hydrophilic antibiotic amikacin (7.5 mg/kg BW) was administered. Following this baseline measurement, the treatment group received fluid therapy as a constant rate infusion of 0.9% saline at 6 mL/kg/h over 36 h. After 24 h of fluid administration, the marker drugs and amikacin were administered again. When comparing both groups, a significant effect of fluid administration on the total body clearances of iohexol (p = 0.032) and amikacin (p = 0.0014) was observed. Clearances of iohexol and amikacin increased with on average 15 and 14%, although large interindividual variability was observed. This led to decreased systemic exposure to amikacin, which was manifested as decrease in area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 h to infinity from 34,807 to 30,804 ng.h/mL. These results suggest that fluid therapy is a key factor involved in the development of ARC and should be taken into account when administering mainly renally excreted drugs. However, further research is necessary to confirm these results in children.

Augmented Renal Clearance and How to Augment Antibiotic Dosing

Augmented renal clearance (ARC) refers to the state of heightened renal filtration commonly observed in the critically ill. Its prevalence in this patient population is a consequence of the body’s natural response to serious disease, as well as the administration of fluids and pharmacologic therapies necessary to maintain sufficient blood pressure. ARC is objectively defined as a creatinine clearance of more than 130 mL/min/1.73 m² and is thus a crucial condition to consider when administering antibiotics, many of which are cleared renally. Using conventional dosing regimens risks the possibility of subtherapeutic concentrations or clinical failure. Over the past decade, research has been conducted in patients with ARC who received a number of antibacterials frequently used in the critically ill, such as piperacillin-tazobactam or vancomycin. Strategies to contend with this condition have also been explored, though further investigations remain necessary.

Augmented renal clearance in pediatric intensive care: are we undertreating our sickest patients?

Many critically ill patients display a supraphysiological renal function with enhanced renal perfusion and glomerular hyperfiltration. This phenomenon described as augmented renal clearance (ARC) may result in enhanced drug elimination through renal excretion mechanisms. Augmented renal clearance seems to be triggered by systemic inflammation and therapeutic interventions in intensive care. There is growing evidence that ARC is not restricted to the adult intensive care population, but is also prevalent in critically ill children. Augmented renal clearance is often overlooked due to the lack of reliable methods to assess renal function in critically ill children. Standard equations to calculate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are developed for patients who have a steady-state creatinine production and a stable renal function. Those formulas are not reliable in critically ill patients with acutely changing GFR and tend to underestimate true GFR in patients with ARC. Tools for real-time, continuous, and non-invasive measurement of fluctuating GFR are most needed to identify changes in kidney function during critical illness and therapeutic interventions. Such devices are currently being validated and hold a strong potential to become the standard of practice. In the meantime, urinary creatinine clearance is considered the most reliable method to detect ARC in critically ill patients. Augmented renal clearance is clearly associated with subtherapeutic antimicrobial concentrations and subsequent therapeutic failure. This warrants the need for adjusted dosing regimens to optimize pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic target attainment. This review aims to summarize current knowledge on ARC in critically ill children, to give insight into its possible pathophysiological mechanism, to evaluate screening methods for ARC in the pediatric intensive care population, and to illustrate the effect of ARC on drug exposure, therapeutic efficacy, and clinical outcome.

Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Augmented Renal Clearance in Trauma Patients

BACKGROUND

Augmented renal clearance (ARC; i.e., creatinine clearance [CL_Cr] ≥ 130 mL/min) has an incidence of 14%-80% in critically ill patients and has been associated with therapy failures for renally cleared drugs. However, the clinical implications of ARC are poorly defined. We hypothesize that modifiable risk factors that contribute to ARC can be identified in severely injured trauma patients and that these risk factors influence clinical outcome.

METHODS

In 207 trauma intensive care unit patients, 24-h CL_Cr was correlated with clinical estimates of glomerular filtration rate (by Cockroft-Gault, modification of diet in renal disease, or chronic kidney disease epidemiology), and clinical outcomes (infection, venous thromboembolism [VTE], length of stay, and mortality).

RESULTS

The population was 45 ± 20 y, 68% male, 77% blunt injury with injury severity score of 24 (17-30). Admission serum creatinine was 1.02 ± 0.35 mg/dL, CL_Cr was 154 ± 77 mL/min, VTE incidence was 15%, ARC incidence was 57%, and mortality was 11%. Clinical estimates of glomerular filtration rate by Cockroft-Gault, modification of diet in renal disease, chronic kidney disease epidemiology underestimated actual CL_Cr by 20%, 22%, or 15% (all P < 0.01). CL_Cr was higher in males and those who survived, and lower in those with hypertension, diabetes, positive cultures, receiving transfusions, or pressors (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, male gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.9 [1.4-6.1]), age (OR 0.97 [0.95-0.99]), and packed red blood cells transfusion (OR 0.31 [0.15-0.66]) were the only independent predictors of ARC.

CONCLUSIONS

ARC occurs in more than half of all high-risk trauma intensive care unit patients and is underestimated by standard clinical equations. ARC was not associated with increased incidence of VTE or infection but rather is associated with younger healthier males and reduced mortality. ARC seems to be a beneficial compensatory response to trauma.

Augmented renal clearance: a common condition in critically ill children

BACKGROUND

Augmented renal clearance (ARC), an increase in kidney function with enhanced elimination of circulating solute, has been increasingly recognized in critically ill adults. In a pediatric intensive care setting, data are scarce. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of ARC in critically ill children. Secondary objectives included a risk factor analysis for the development of ARC and a comparison of two methods for assessment of renal function.

METHODS

In 105 critically ill children between 1 month and 15 years of age, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured by means of a daily 24-h creatinine clearance (24 h Cl_Cr) and compared to an estimated GFR using the revised Schwartz formula. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for ARC.

RESULTS

Overall, 67% of patients expressed ARC and the proportion of ARC patients decreased during consecutive days. ARC patients had a median Cl_Cr of 142.2 ml/min/1.73m² (IQR 47.1). Male gender and antibiotic treatment were independently associated with the occurrence of ARC. The revised Schwartz formula seems less appropriate for ARC detection.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of critically ill children develop ARC during their stay at the intensive care unit. Clinicians should be cautious when using Schwartz formula to detect ARC. Our findings require confirmation from large study cohorts and investigation of the relationship with clinical outcome.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Augmented Renal Clearance in a Population of Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients show a high, albeit variable, prevalence of augmented renal clearance (ARC). This condition has relevant consequences on the elimination of hydrophilic drugs. Knowledge of risk factors for ARC helps in the early identification of ARC. The aims of this study were evaluation of (1) risk factors for ARC and (2) the prevalence of ARC in critically ill patients over a period of 1 year.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed for all consecutive patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU). Augmented renal clearance was defined by a creatinine clearance ≥130 mL/min/1.73 m². "Patient with ARC" was defined as a patient with a median of creatinine clearance ≥130 mL/min/1.73 m² over the period of admission. Four variables were tested, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), male gender, age, and trauma as cause for ICU admission. An analysis (patient based and clearance based) was performed with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 475 patients, 446 were included in this study, contributing to 454 ICU admissions and 5586 8-hour creatinine clearance (8h-CL_CR). Overall, the prevalence of patients with ARC was 24.9% (n = 113). In a subset of patients with normal serum creatinine levels, the prevalence was 43.0% (n = 104). Of the set of all 8h-CL_CR measurements, 25.4% (1418) showed ARC. In the patient-based analysis, the adjusted odds ratio was: 2.0 (confidence interval [CI]:1.1-3.7; P < .05), 0.93 (CI: 0.91-0.94; P < .01), 2.7 (CI: 1.4-5.3; P < .01), and 0.98 (CI: 0.96 -1.01; P = .15), respectively, for trauma, age, male sex, and SAPS II. In the clearance-based analysis, the adjusted odds ratio were 1.7 (CI: 1.4-1.9; P < .01), 0.94 (CI: 0.932-0.942; P < .01), and 2.9 (CI: 2.4-3.4; P < .01), respectively, for trauma, age, and male sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma, young age, and male sex were independent risk factors for ARC. This condition occurs in a considerable proportion of critical care patients, which was particularly prevalent in patients without evidence of renal dysfunction.

Augmented renal clearance

Adding to the complexity of caring for critically ill patients is the fact that many of them have a creatinine clearance that exceeds 130 mL/min/1.73 m². This phenomenon, termed augmented renal clearance (ARC), has only recently been widely recognized and its pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. However, ARC has been shown to result in increased dose requirements for drugs that are primarily eliminated by renal excretion, including many antimicrobial agents and enoxaparin. Recognition of ARC is hampered by the fact that the standard creatinine-based equations used to estimate renal function are not accurate in this clinical setting and the diagnosis is best established using both serum and urine creatinine measurements to calculate clearance. So a high index of clinical suspicion and awareness is usually required before this step is taken to confirm the diagnosis of ARC.

Reliability of serum creatinine-based formulae estimating renal function in non-critically ill surgery patients: Focus on augmented renal clearance

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Formulae estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are frequently used to guide drug dosing. The objectives of this prospective single-center study were to evaluate agreement between these equations and measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) in non-critically ill surgery patients with normal kidney function and augmented renal clearance (ARC, CrCl ≥ 130 mL/min/1.73 m²), to determine predictors for disagreement, define a GFR estimator cut-off value identifying ARC and determine the ARC prevalence and duration in non-critically ill surgical patients.

METHODS

Hospitalized adult non-critically ill abdominal and trauma surgery patients were eligible for inclusion. Measured CrCl based on an 8-hour urinary collection (CrCl_8h ) was used as the primary method for determining kidney function. Agreement between equations and measured CrCl_8h was assessed in terms of precision, defined as a bias within ±10 mL/min/1.73 m². Predictors for disagreement were identified for the most precise estimator using an ordinal logistic regression model with negative bias, agreement and positive bias as outcome variables. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify an estimator cut-off predicting ARC, which was subsequently applied for the daily proportion of patients displaying ARC and ARC duration.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

During the study period (14/11/2013 - 13/05/2014), in 232 adult non-critically ill abdominal and trauma surgery patients, all estimators tend to underestimate CrCl_8h (mean bias ranging from 17 to 22 mL/min/1.73 m²), especially in patients displaying ARC (mean bias ranging from 44 to 56 mL/min/1.73 m²). eGFR_CKD-EPI performed the best. Younger age and low ASA score independently predicted underestimation of CrCl_8h . Three different eGFR_CKD-EPI cut-offs with decreasing sensitivity and increasing specificity (84, 95 and 112 mL/min/1.73 m²) identified, respectively, 65%, 44% and 14% patients displaying ARC. The median ARC duration was 4, 4 and 3 days, respectively.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

In surgical patients, eGFR frequently underestimates measured CrCl, especially in young patients with low ASA score. eGFR cut-offs predicting ARC were identified.

Augmented Renal Clearance in Critical Illness: An Important Consideration in Drug Dosing

Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a manifestation of enhanced renal function seen in critically ill patients. The use of regular unadjusted doses of renally eliminated drugs in patients with ARC might lead to therapy failure. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide and up-to-date summary of the available evidence pertaining to the phenomenon of ARC. A literature search of databases of available evidence in humans, with no language restriction, was conducted. Databases searched were MEDLINE (1946 to April 2017), EMBASE (1974 to April 2017) and the Cochrane Library (1999 to April 2017). A total of 57 records were included in the present review: 39 observational studies (25 prospective, 14 retrospective), 6 case reports/series and 12 conference abstracts. ARC has been reported to range from 14-80%. ARC is currently defined as an increased creatinine clearance of greater than 130 mL/min/1.73 m² best measured by 8-24 h urine collection. Patients exhibiting ARC tend to be younger (<50 years old), of male gender, had a recent history of trauma, and had lower critical illness severity scores. Numerous studies have reported antimicrobials treatment failures when using standard dosing regimens in patients with ARC. In conclusion, ARC is an important phenomenon that might have significant impact on outcome in critically ill patients. Identifying patients at risk, using higher doses of renally eliminated drugs or use of non-renally eliminated alternatives might need to be considered in ICU patients with ARC. More research is needed to solidify dosing recommendations of various drugs in patients with ARC.