Resuscitative practices and the use of low-titer group O whole blood in pediatric trauma

Neonatal trauma resuscitation: Successful use of low-titer O+ whole blood in a 4-day-old infant with hemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND

Neonatal trauma resuscitation is particularly challenging in cases of profound hemorrhagic shock. Low-titer group O+ whole blood (LTOWB+) has emerged as a potentially effective option in pediatric trauma, but its use in neonates is debated due to risks such as D-alloimmunization. In life-threatening emergencies, decisions must carefully balance immediate survival benefits against long-term risks.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We present a case report of a 4-day-old neonate transported as a Level 1 trauma following a dog attack to the head, resulting in hemorrhagic shock and cardiac arrest. Upon arrival to the trauma bay, the patient was pulseless, with unsuccessful intraosseous and intravenous vascular access attempts. Access was eventually achieved using an umbilical venous catheter, enabling administration of LTOWB+.

RESULTS

Administration of LTOWB+ resulted in the return of spontaneous circulation, improved perfusion, and hemodynamic stabilization. The patient remained alive at the 6-month follow-up. LTOWB+ facilitated rapid correction of hemorrhagic shock with no immediate complications observed.

DISCUSSION

This case underscores the challenges of neonatal trauma resuscitation, including vascular access and the use of LTOWB+. LTOWB+ proved lifesaving, enabling rapid correction of acidosis and an improved outcome. Although concerns persist regarding LTOWB+ administration, the immediate survival benefits outweigh the risks, supported by evidence demonstrating its efficacy and safety. This case highlights the need for adaptability and a systematic approach to managing complex neonatal trauma scenarios. We argue that LTOWB+ is poised to become a pillar of pediatric resuscitation, providing a lifesaving, efficient, and safe option even in the newborn.

O blood usage trends in the pediatric population 2015-2019: A multi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

In 2019, AABB released the bulletin "Recommendations on the Use of Group O Red Blood Cells" in which the recommendations about pediatric and neonatal blood transfusions were limited. Eight U.S. pediatric hospitals sought to determine trends in pediatric group O blood use and clarify which pediatric populations receive group O blood transfusions despite a non-group O blood type.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Eight U.S.-based institutions serving a pediatric population provided data from their respective Electronic Health Records. Data submitted included unit blood type, patient blood type, patient age, sex, and discharge diagnosis. If the discharge diagnosis was not available, the admitting diagnosis was substituted. GPT-4 was used to sort diagnoses into categories for analysis. Data were visualized using a series of alluvial plots, spaghetti plots, and tables. Tables were stratified on variables of interest (blood type, age, sex, diagnosis) to explore O blood type distribution among different patient populations.

RESULTS

A total of 142,227 discrete transfusion events were identified, of which 52,731 recipients were non-O blood type. Overall, 35,575 transfusion events of O blood went to A, B, or AB blood type recipients (67%). Additionally, 26% of Rh(D) negative transfusion events went to recipients who were Rh(D) positive. Top diagnostic categories for receiving O blood type were cardiovascular disorders (22%) and sickle cell anemia (15%).

DISCUSSION

This study highlights opportunities to address O blood supply challenges by identifying where non-O blood may be utilized safely in the vulnerable pediatric population.

Forty-eight-hour cold-stored whole blood in paediatric cardiac surgery: Implications for haemostasis and blood donor exposures

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cold-stored whole blood (CS-WB) in paediatric cardiac surgery is making a resurgence, given its identified benefits compared to conventional blood component therapy (CT).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A single-centre retrospective study was conducted from January 2018 to October 2018 by including children <18 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. ABO-compatible CS-WB from non-directed random donors was leukoreduced with platelet-sparing filters and compared with CT.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (30, 53% CS-WB; 27, 47% CT) were studied. Patient demographics were similar, although CT patients were cooled to a lower intra-operative temperature. Blood product requirements 24 h post operation were less in the CS-WB group (11.1 vs. 26.7 mL/kg, p = 0.048). Twelve (40%) patients in the CS-WB cohort had more than one donor exposure versus 25 (93%) in the CT group (p < 0.001). CT patients compared to CS-WB patients had a greater decrease in pre-operative versus 48-h post-operative haemoglobin, platelets and prothrombin time. Patients who received CT compared to CS-WB had a trend towards higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) chest-tube output (mL/kg/h) in the first 4 h post cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) admission (2.1 [0.8, 3] vs. 1.6 [0.8, 2.2], p = 0.197). There was no difference in antifibrinolytic use, length of stay, sepsis, acute kidney injury or wound infection. Survival to discharge was similar.

CONCLUSION

CS-WB in paediatric cardiac surgery may reduce donor exposure and improve haemostatic balance. Future multi-centre prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and identify patients who would benefit from CS-WB in paediatric cardiac surgery.

Use of low titer O whole blood in infants and young children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) is commonly used for severe bleeding in trauma patients. LTOWB may also benefit young children requiring cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at risk of severe bleeding.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, children <2 years old who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB were included. Comparisons were performed between those receiving component therapy (CT) versus those receiving LTOWB plus CT (LTOWB+CT). Outcomes included drainage tube (DT) output and total transfusion volumes. Optimization-based weighting was used for adjusted analyses between groups.

RESULTS

There were 117 patients transfused with only CT and 127 patients transfused with LTOWB+CT. In the LTOWB+CT group, 66 were Group non-O and 61 were Group O. Total transfusion volumes given from the start of the operation until the first 24 h in the cardiac intensive care unit was a median (IQR) 41 (10, 93) mL/kg in the CT group and 48 (28, 77) mL/kg in the LTOWB+CT group, (p = .28). Median (IQR) DT output was 22 (15-32) in CT versus 22 (16-28) in LTOWB+CT groups, (p = .27). There were no differences in death, renal failure and a composite of death and renal failure between the two groups, but there were statistically fewer re-explorations for bleeding in the LTOWB+CT group (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LTOWB appears to be safe in <2 years old undergoing cardiac surgery and may reduce re-explorations for severe bleeding. Large trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of LTOWB in this population with severe bleeding.

RhD-Alloimmunization in Adult and Pediatric Trauma Patients

The actual risk of providing RhD-positive units to RhD-negative recipients remains debatable. There is no standard of care in the United States (US) to guide transfusion decisions regarding RhD type for patients with an unknown blood type, except for women of childbearing age and neonates. The risk of alloantibody formation by an RhD-negative patient exposed to RhD-positive blood is reported to be from 3% to 70%. Due to such wide variations, this review was undertaken to determine the prevalence of anti-D alloimmunization in trauma patients who are RhD-negative and were transfused RhD-positive blood products. This study used the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) approach to answer the question, "In trauma patients who were transfused blood, what is the prevalence of alloimmunization to the D-antigen?" The review included all published articles through April 3, 2022 in databases. Articles published after the search period found by the authors were added to the manuscript if they addressed the primary question and there was unanimous consensus. There were 1683 full-text articles that met the search criteria, with 19 studies meeting eligibility criteria. In addition, 57 references were added after the search period had closed. The incidence of anti-D alloimmunization in adult trauma patients receiving whole blood varied from 7.8% to 42.7%. In contrast, incidence varied in patients receiving red blood cells (RBCs), from 0 to 94%, depending on number of categories analyzed. Anti-D alloimmunization with platelet transfusions varied from 0% to 19%. The alloimmunization rate increased with age and was detected only in children older than 5 years. Recent guidelines recommend the administration of Rh immune globulin (RhIG) to all traumatically injured patients who are both RhD-negative and pregnant. However, there is no specific guidance focused on the RhD-negative patient, pregnant or nonpregnant, and who have received RhD-positive red blood cells (RBC) and platelets. While numerous studies have attempted to evaluate the frequency of RhD alloimmunization rate in trauma settings, emerging data suggests that many factors affect this phenomenon. Additionally, the role of RhIG administration in cases of RhD-incompatible transfusions within the trauma setting adds complexity. As our trajectory propels us towards precision medicine and tailored transfusion practices, gaining a big data approach becomes indispensable.

Prehospital Whole Blood Administration for Pediatric Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Case Report

The management of gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage in a prehospital setting presents significant challenges, particularly in arresting the hemorrhage and initiating resuscitation. This case report introduces a novel instance of prehospital whole blood transfusion to an 8-year-old male with severe lower GI hemorrhage, marking a shift in prehospital pediatric care. The patient, with no previous significant medical history, presented with acute rectal bleeding, severe hypotension (systolic/diastolic blood pressure [BP] 50/30 mmHg), and tachycardia (148 bpm). Early intervention by Emergency Medical Services (EMS), including the administration of 500 mL (16 mL/kg) of whole blood, led to marked improvement in vital signs (BP 97/64 mmHg and heart rate 93 bpm), physiology, and physical appearance, underscoring the potential effectiveness of prehospital whole blood transfusion in pediatric GI hemorrhage. Upon hospital admission, a Meckel's diverticulum was identified as the bleeding source, and it was successfully surgically resected. The patient's recovery was ultimately favorable, highlighting the importance of rapid, prehospital intervention and the potential role of whole blood transfusion in managing acute pediatric GI hemorrhage. This case supports the notion of advancing EMS protocols to include interventions historically reserved for the hospital setting that may significantly impact patient outcomes from the field.

Use of Low-Titer O-Positive Whole Blood in Female Trauma Patients: A Literature Review, Qualitative Multidisciplinary Analysis of Risk/Benefit, and Guidelines for Its Use as a Universal Product in Hemorrhagic Shock

BACKGROUND

Whole blood transfusion is associated with benefits including improved survival, coagulopathy, and decreased transfusion requirements. The majority of whole blood transfusion is in the form of low-titer O-positive whole blood (LTOWB). Practice at many trauma centers withholds the use of LTOWB in women of childbearing potential due to concerns of alloimmunization. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence for LTOWB transfusion in female trauma patients and generate guidelines for its application.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature and evidence for LTOWB transfusion in hemorrhagic shock are reviewed. The rates of alloimmunization and subsequent obstetrical outcomes are compared to the reported outcomes of LTOWB vs other resuscitation media. Literature regarding patient experiences and preferences in regards to the risk of alloimmunization is compared to current trauma practices.

RESULTS

LTOWB has shown improved outcomes in both military and civilian settings. The overall risk of alloimmunization for Rhesus factor (Rh) - female patients in hemorrhagic shock exposed to Rh + blood is low (3% to 20%). Fetal outcomes in Rh-sensitized patients are excellent compared to historical standards, and treatment options continue to expand. The majority of female patients surveyed on the risk of alloimmunization favor receiving Rh + blood products to improve trauma outcomes. Obstetrical transfusion practices have incorporated LTOWB with excellent results.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of whole blood resuscitation in trauma is associated with benefits in the resuscitation of severely injured patients. The rate at which severely injured, Rh-negative patients develop anti-D antibodies is low. Treatments for alloimmunized pregnancies have advanced, with excellent results. Fears of alloimmunization in female patients are likely overstated and may not warrant the withholding of whole blood resuscitation. The benefits of whole blood resuscitation likely outweigh the risks of alloimmunization.