Combination of Arthrolysis by Lateral and Medial Approaches and Hinged External Fixation in the Treatment of Stiff Elbow

Comparative study of the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis with or without external fixation for severe elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach open arthrolysis with and without hinged external fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of patients with severe elbow stiffness who were treated in our institution from January 2018 to January 2019. All of them were treated with combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis. There were 20 patients who had the hinged external fixation placed and 29 patients without the placement of the external fixation. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 28.4 ± 3.7 months. There were no significant differences in the ROM of the elbow, MEPS, VAS, DASH, or complications between the two groups. The operation time and treatment cost of the patients without external fixation were significantly lower than patients with external fixation.

CONCLUSION

Combined medial-lateral approach open elbow arthrolysis without external fixation is a safe and effective way to treat elbow stiffness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Midterm Outcomes After Open Arthrolysis for Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Open arthrolysis is used for treating elbow stiffness in adults. This study evaluated the midterm outcomes after open arthrolysis in children and adolescents with posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

Data of 31 children and adolescents with posttraumatic elbow stiffness following open arthrolysis with or without hinged external fixation from 2010 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Their mean age was 15 (range: 6 to 19) years. At baseline and the follow-up (>4 y), we evaluated the outcomes (range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Index) and postoperative complications (pain, ulnar nerve symptoms, infections, and instability) and analyzed the association between outcomes and clinical variables.

RESULTS

The Mayo Elbow Performance Index improved from 67.9 (range: 35 to 95 points) to 93.7 points (range: 65 to 100 points; P<0.001). The elbow active flexion/extension arc increased significantly from 49 degrees (range: 0 to 120 degrees) to 108 degrees (range: 0 to 120 degrees; P<0.001), with a mean flexion of 123 degrees (range: 70 to 140 degrees; P<0.001) and mean extension of 15 degrees (range: 0 to 85 degrees; P<0.001) postoperatively. The increasing age at surgery was associated with improved elbow motions (P=0.004). Patients with increased preoperative serum alkaline phosphatase level demonstrated decreased arc of motion (P=0.015). Patients with extra-articular fractures had better outcomes than the other patients. At the final follow-up, 8 patients experienced recurrent contracture in the flexion arc with heterotopic ossification. Two patients had postoperative pain, 1 elbow instability, and 1 ulnar neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients showed satisfactory functional outcomes after arthrolysis, indicating that open release with or without hinged external fixation is an effective and maintained technique for children and adolescents with posttraumatic elbow stiffness. The age at surgery, preoperative alkaline phosphatase level, and injury type should be considered to achieve good outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

Effect of hyperuricemia on functional outcomes and complications in patients with elbow stiffness after open arthrolysis combined with hinged external fixation: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hyperuricemia is considered a risk factor for increased postoperative complications and adverse functional outcomes in a variety of orthopedic surgeries. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of patients with different uric acid levels after elbow arthrolysis.

METHODS

The study included 131 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness who underwent arthrolysis between March 2014 and March 2016. All patients were divided into 4 groups based on the preoperative serum level of uric acid (UA). The quartile method was used for grouping patients, including 33 in Q1 (UA <293 μmol/L), 34 in Q2 (293-348 μmol/L), 32 in Q3 (348-441 μmol/L), and 32 in Q4 (441-710 μmol/L). At baseline and each time point of follow-up, functional performance, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, visual analog scale for pain, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Preoperative data were not significantly different among the 4 groups (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4). At the final follow-up, the following data showed significant differences among the 4 groups: extension (P = .031), flexion (P = .008), range of motion (P = .003), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (P = .011), and visual analog scale (P = .032). Interestingly, patients in the Q4 group had the poorest clinical outcomes. However, no significant differences were found among the 4 groups in new onset or exacerbation of nerve symptoms (P = .919), reduced muscle strength (P = .536), instability (P = .567), or infection (P = .374) at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness, abnormal serum uric acid metabolism was a risk factor for poor performance and postoperative pain after arthrolysis. Therefore, detecting the preoperative serum uric acid levels of the patients would be helpful for evaluating the postoperative outcomes.

A new pathologic classification for elbow stiffness based on our experience in 216 patients

BACKGROUND

Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. This study aimed to develop a new pathologic classification to further understand and standardize elbow arthrolysis from a new perspective, as well as to determine clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Extension-flexion dysfunction was classified into 4 types: EF_I, tethers alone; EF_II, tethers with blocks; EF_III, articular malformation; and EF_IV, bony ankylosis. Forearm rotation dysfunction was classified into 3 types: FR_I, contracture alone; FR_II, radial head malunion or nonunion; and FR_III, proximal radioulnar bony ankylosis. A total of 216 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included and categorized preoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by the same chief surgeon; different types underwent specific procedures. Patient data, elbow motion, and functional scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 40° preoperatively to 118° at final follow-up; 88% of patients regained ROM of 100° or greater. The forearm rotation arc (FRA) with forearm rotation dysfunction increased from a preoperative mean of 76° to 128°; 82% of patients regained an FRA of 100° or greater. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) increased from 63 to 91 points; the proportion of patients with good or excellent results was 95%. EF_I patients had the best ROM (129°) and MEPI (93 points) and EF_IV patients achieved the most-changed ROM (116°), whereas EF_III patients had the worst ROM (104°) and MEPI (84 points) and the least-changed ROM (64°). The FRA was best in FR_I patients (142°), followed by FR_II patients (118°), and worst in FR_III patients (82°); in contrast, the changed FRA was greatest in FR_III patients (82°), followed by FR_II patients (64°), and least in FR_I patients (37°).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the proposed pathologic classification provides a new perspective on the understanding and standardization of elbow arthrolysis, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes.

The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing

PURPOSE

The effect of open release of a post-traumatic elbow contracture on the stability of the joint has not been so far studied in vivo. Resection of elbow joint capsule, the key element of surgery, was reported to have no effect on the stability of cadaveric elbows. The joint capsule is yet known to participate in maintaining elbow stability as one of secondary stabilizers.

METHODS

We assessed elbow joint laxity in 39 patients who underwent an open contracture release via the 'column procedure' described by B. Morrey and P. Mansat within the preceeding three to nine months. The measurements were taken with an apparatus designed particularly for this experiment according to the predetermined protocol. A preliminary part of the experiment showed that there was no significant difference between laxity of two elbow joints in healthy volunteers. Laxity of the operated elbows could be then compared with the contralateral joints.

RESULTS

Mean absolute difference of laxity between healthy and operated elbows was 1.55° (0.1°-4.1°, SD = 1.1) being significantly lower than 2°, p = 0.0056. The difference of the joint laxity between the operated and healthy elbows did not differ statistically significantly by more than 0.6° from the difference of the laxity of two healthy elbows and, therefore, is not clinically noticeable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experiment confirmed that the 'column procedure' is a safe procedure which does not compromise the stability of the elbow joint.

[Mid-term effectiveness of arthrolysis and hinged external fixation for treatment of stiff elbow caused by heterotrophic ossification]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the mid-term effectiveness of arthrolysis and hinged external fixation for the treatment of stiff elbow caused by heterotrophic ossification.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2017, 11 patients with stiff elbow caused by heterotrophic ossification were admitted. There were 9 males and 2 females with an average age of 32 years (range, 14-48 years), and left side in 6 cases and right side in 5 cases. The cause of stiff elbow included humerus fracture in 5 cases, ulna fracture in 2 cases, fracture of capitulum radii in 1 case, dislocation of capitulum radii in 1 case, terrible triad of the elbow in 1 case, and soft tissue injury in 1 case. The disease duration ranged from 7 to 18 months (mean, 11 months). Preoperative active range of motion of elbow was (19.6±17.5)° and Mayo score was 34.1±9.7. All patients received the treatment of arthrolysis and debridement of heterotrophic ossification lesion combining hinged external fixator, and active and passive rehabilitation with the help of hinged external fixator. The hinged external fixators were removed after 2 months.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up 13-36 months (mean, 19.1 months). All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication of infection or nerve lesion occurred postoperatively. At last follow-up, the results of X-ray films showed that no heterotrophic ossification recurred. The active range of motion of elbow was (116.4±16.6)° and Mayo score was 93.2±7.8, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative ones ( t=17.508, P=0.000; t=16.618, P=0.000).

CONCLUSION

The application of arthrolysis and debridement of heterotrophic ossification lesion combining hinged external fixator can improve the elbow's range of motion significantly and obtain a good mid-term effectiveness.

What Range of Motion and Functional Results Can Be Expected After Open Arthrolysis with Hinged External Fixation For Severe Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness?

BACKGROUND

The elbow is more susceptible to loss of motion after trauma than any other joint. Open arthrolysis often is performed for posttraumatic elbow stiffness if the stiffness does not improve with nonsurgical treatment, but the midterm results of this procedure and factors that may limit recovery have not been widely studied.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We reviewed patients who had undergone open arthrolysis with hinged external fixator for severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness (ROM ≤ 60°) with a minimum of 5 years followup to (1) analyze ROM gains; (2) assess functional improvement with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and DASH, quality of life with the SF-36, pain with VAS, and ulnar nerve function with the Amadio rating scale and Dellon classification; and (3) identify complications and risk factors that might hinder mid-term elbow motion recovery after this procedure.

METHODS

Between March 2011 and December 2012, we generally offered patients with elbow stiffness an open arthrolysis procedure when function did not improve with 6 months of nonoperative therapy, and no contraindications such as immature heterotopic ossification or complete destruction of articular cartilage were present. During that time, 161 patients underwent open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness at our institution; 49 of them satisfied the study inclusion criteria (adults with elbow ROM ≤ 60° as a result of trauma) and exclusion criteria (stiffness caused by burns or central nervous system injuries, causative trauma associated with nonunion or malunion of the elbow, severe articular damage that would have necessitated joint arthroplasty, or prior elbow release). In general, a combined medial-lateral approach to the elbow was performed to address the soft tissue tethers and any blocks to elbow motion, and a hinged external fixator was applied for 6 weeks to maintain elbow stability and improve the efficacy of postoperative rehabilitation. These patients were evaluated retrospectively at a mean followup period of 69 months (range, 62-83 months), and demographics, disease characteristics, arthrolysis details, pre- and postoutcome measures as noted, and complications were recorded via an electronic database. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM recovery.

RESULTS

At final followup, total ROM increased from a preoperative mean of 27 ± 20° to a postoperative mean of 131 ± 11° (mean difference, 104°; 95% CI, 98°-111°; p < 0.001), and 98% (48 of 49) of patients achieved a functional ROM of 30° to 130°. Improvements were also found in functional scores (MEPI: 54 ± 12 to 95 ± 7, mean difference, 41 points; DASH: 48 ± 17 to 8 ± 8, mean difference, 40 points; both p < 0.001), life quality (physical SF-36: 46 ± 11 to 81 ± 12, mean difference, 35 points; mental SF-36: 43 ± 14 to 80 ± 9, mean difference, 37 points; both p < .001), pain (VAS: 2.5 ± 2.4 to 0.4 ± 0.8; mean difference, 2.0 points; p < 0.001), and ulnar nerve function (Amadio score: 7.8 ± 1.9 to 8.4 ± 0.8; mean difference, 0.6 points; p = 0.004). A total of 18% (nine of 49 patients) developed complications, including new-onset or exacerbated nerve symptoms (four patients), recurrent heterotopic ossification (two patients), and pin-related infections (three patients). No patients underwent subsequent surgery for any of the above complications. Lastly, the medium-term ROM was divided into ROM ≤ 120° (n = 9) and ROM > 120° (n = 40). After controlling for potential confounding variables such as duration of stiffness and tobacco use, we found that tobacco use was the only independent risk factor examined (odds ratio, 9; 95% CI, 2-47; p = 0.009) associated with recovery of ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory medium-term results were found for open arthrolysis with hinged external fixation with our protocol in patients who had severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness. Appropriate and sufficient releases of tethered soft tissues and correction of any blocks that affect elbow motion intraoperatively, a dedicated team approach, and an aggressive and systematic postoperative rehabilitation program are the core steps for this procedure. Additionally, the importance of preoperative discontinuation of tobacco use should be emphasized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Determining the effective timing of an open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Following trauma, the elbow is the most susceptible to restricted motion among all joints. Open arthrolysis is often performed for post-traumatic elbow stiffness if that stiffness does not improve with non-operative management. However, the optimal timing for performing an open arthrolysis remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome (elbow motion and function) and the rate of complications among patients who had undergone early, median and late release procedures to establish an optimal time interval following the injury, after which, an effective open arthrolysis can be performed.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we included total 133 patients, who had undergone open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. The subjects were divided into 3 groups, with 31 patients in the early release group (arthrolysis performed at 6–10 months after injury), 78 patients in the median release group (at 11–20 months), and 24 patients in the late release group (at > 20 months). The release procedure in all patients was performed by the same surgeon, using the same technique. The general data, functional performance, and complications, if any, were retrospectively documented for all patients and statistically analysed.

Results

The demographic data and disease characteristics of all patients were comparable at baseline. Postoperatively, no significant differences were found among the three groups with respect to the range of motion (p = 0.067), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p = 0.350) and its ratings (p = 0.329), visual analog scale score for pain (p = 0.227), Dellon classification for ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.497), and each discrete complication (all p values > 0.05).

Conclusions

At the final follow-up, our results showed no significant difference in the postoperative elbow motion capacities, functional scores and the rates of complications among patients who had undergone an early, median, and late release. Therefore, we have recommended that an early arthrolysis would be preferable due to its multiple advantages, and the conventionally observed interval of > 1 year after the injury, could be shortened.

Level of evidence

Level III; Retrospective Cohort Design; Therapeutic Study.

Impact of different glucose metabolism status on clinical outcomes of open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

Diabetes and prediabetes are worldwide public health problems and are considered predisposing factors for adverse functional outcomes after various orthopedic operations. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the impact of glucose metabolism status on functional outcomes and complications after open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

The study included 152 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness undergoing arthrolysis, including 120 in the normoglycemic group, 21 in the impaired glucose regulation group, and 11 in the diabetes mellitus group. General patient data, functional performance, and complications were documented and analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographic data and disease characteristics were comparable at baseline. Postoperatively, significant differences were found in range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score: the diabetes mellitus group had the poorest clinical outcomes. However, there were no significant differences in forearm rotation, visual analog scale pain scores, and complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness and abnormal glucose metabolism were at increased risk of poorer outcomes after open arthrolysis, and patients with diabetes mellitus had the poorest performance. This study underlines the importance of glycemic control in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism before open arthrolysis.

Effect of disease duration on functional outcomes and complications after arthrolysis in patients with elbow stiffness

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a long duration of elbow stiffness on functional outcomes and complications after arthrolysis.

METHODS

Participants included consecutive patients with a long duration of elbow stiffness (≥5 years, n = 23) and control patients matched for age, sex, and initial injury type (n = 46). All patients underwent elbow arthrolysis combined with hinged external fixation between March 2014 and March 2016. At baseline and follow-up, we evaluated elbow motion (flexion, extension, supination, pronation, and range of motion) and patient-reported outcomes, including the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and visual analog scale for pain. Postoperative complications including infection, nerve dysfunction, and instability were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative elbow pain, range of motion, or MEPS between groups. Postoperatively, pronation and the MEPS in patients with a long disease duration were inferior to those in control patients (P = .041 and P = .016, respectively). Patients with a long disease duration also had a significantly higher incidence of complications than control patients (P = .002). At final follow-up, 7 patients (30%) in the long disease duration group and 3 patients (7%) in the control group presented with nerve symptoms (P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

A long duration of elbow stiffness may negatively influence functional outcomes and increase the risk of complications after arthrolysis.

Effect on muscle strength of the upper extremities after open elbow arthrolysis

Background

Open elbow arthrolysis manipulates tendons and soft tissues surrounding the elbow and may lead to strength decline after the operation. We hypothesized that strength of elbow and wrist motions and handgrip could be compromised after the procedure and that the strength recovery pattern may differ between men and women and between the dominant and nondominant side.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. We monitored 32 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness who underwent open arthrolysis between June 2014 and December 2014. All patients underwent standardized postoperative physical therapy. Preoperative and postoperative isometric strength were measured by a handheld dynamometer. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and arc of motion (AOM) were also analyzed.

Results

Mean follow-up was 26.13 months. Significant improvement was noticed in mean AOM (from 46° to 127°) and MEPS (from 67.97 to 96.86). No significant decline was noted in isometric strength at the last follow-up day. The strength ratios between men and women showed no significant difference from postoperative day 7 to the last follow-up day. At all follow-up assessments, isometric strength showed no significant difference between the dominant and nondominant side.

Conclusions

AOM and MEPS achieved significant enhancement after open elbow arthrolysis. The procedure did not lead to isometric strength decline. Postoperative gain of strength was proportional to the baseline strength level of each muscle group, and men had a more prominent gain of strength than women during the entire follow-up. Dominance had no effect on postoperative strength recovery.

The relation between elbow range of motion and patient satisfaction after open release of stiff elbow

Objective

The aim of this retrospective study was to find out whether a cut off value existed for elbow flexion and extension after open surgical release of elbow contracture that would correlate with subjective patient satisfaction.

Methods

The study enrolled 77 patients (53 males and 24 females with a mean age of 35.1 (18–77) years at the time of operation) with elbow contracture who attended regular follow-up appointments for more than 12 months. The mean follow up period was 44.2 months (12–186). The preoperative and postoperative modified MAYO elbow scores, objective parameters of increase in both flexion and extension end point measurements and improvement in total ROM were compared in order to determine the cut off degree of ROM in both flexion and extension that significantly correlated with patient satisfaction.

Results

Of the 77 participating patients, 26 patients had an extrinsic (33.8%) and 51 patients had an intrinsic elbow contracture (66.2%). Surgeries performed involved 40 cases of lateral release and 37 cases of both lateral and medial (progressive) release. The median preoperative total flexion-extension arch (ROM) was 45° (20°–65°). The median postoperative total flexion-extension arch (ROM) was 110° (97.5°–125°). The modified MAYO elbow score improved from 60 to 85 points postoperatively. The postoperative flexion cut off value was 115° for an excellent or good postoperative modified MAYO elbow score.

Conclusion

Post-operative flexion cut off value was 115° and had a positive effect on the postoperative patient satisfaction. The cut off value for postoperative extension was 20° but it was not a significant variable on patient satisfaction as was the total increase in ROM.

Level of significance

Level IV Therapeutic Study.

The influence of body mass index on outcome of open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

Being overweight has become a serious public health concern in China. Higher body mass index has been proven to be associated with poor outcome after orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of being overweight on functional outcomes and complications after open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including 122 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness undergoing arthrolysis, including 84 in the normal weight group and 38 in the overweight group. Demographic data, surgical data, and data on preoperative and postoperative functional performance and complications were obtained.

RESULTS

Demographic data and disease characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups at baseline. All patients showed significant improvement after elbow arthrolysis. Postoperatively, the range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the normal weight group were significantly better than those of the overweight group. Sixteen patients developed postoperative complications. No significant differences in complication rates between the 2 groups were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients showed satisfactory functional outcomes after arthrolysis. The postoperative functional outcomes of the overweight group were inferior to those of the normal weight group to a certain extent. This study underlines the importance of detailed rehabilitation instructions in patients with higher body mass index.

Reconstruction of medial collateral ligament defects with a flexor-pronator fascia patch in complete open release of stiff elbows

BACKGROUND

Because medial elbow stability is essential for stiff elbow release, surgical techniques have been reported for reconstructing medial elbow stability. However, medial collateral ligament (MCL) defects, caused by inevitable detachment and resection performed for complete release, make the reconstruction more challenging. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated the outcomes after using a flexor-pronator fascia patch in medial elbow reconstruction for open release of stiff elbows. We hypothesized that this technique is effective for repairing MCL defects.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 10 patients. The MCL defects were all reconstructed with a flexor-pronator fascia patch. An external fixator was used in all patients. One patient could not be contacted and was thus excluded from the study. Outcome measures included stability, range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, ulnar nerve symptoms, power grip, and radiographic findings.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 19.6 months; all elbows were stable by the last follow-up. One patient presented with moderate elbow instability and then regained stability 3 months after the external fixator was removed. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 58 points to 94 points, and the mean flexion arc improved from 40° to 133°. No radiographic manifestations of elbow dislocation or suture anchor looseness were observed.

CONCLUSION

A flexor-pronator fascia patch provides sufficient stability for repairing MCL defects without restricting the range of motion gained during arthrolysis.

Open arthrolysis with pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon for treating post-traumatic contracture of the elbow

BACKGROUND

Extensive loss of elbow flexion compromises the performance of daily activities. We examined the clinical outcomes of patients with post-traumatic extension contracture of the elbow treated with open arthrolysis and pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 7 patients (5 men and 2 women; mean age, 35 years) who underwent open arthrolysis via a combined lateral and medial approach with pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon for the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness. All the patients had heterotopic ossification that restricted elbow motion and underwent removal of the ossified tissue and capsular release. The triceps tendon was gradually stretched by making multiple stab incisions on the tendon by using a No. 11 surgical blade. The range of motion of the elbow was recorded both preoperatively and at the final postoperative follow-up. Elbow function was assessed with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for a mean of 24 months. After treatment, significant improvement was noted in the total arc of motion (from 44° to 116°, P <.001), mean flexion (from 80° to 124°, P < .001), and mean extension (from 31° to 8°, P = .004). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved significantly from 59 points preoperatively to 92 points at the final evaluation. No major postoperative complications developed in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that open arthrolysis with pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon is an effective and safe treatment approach for post-traumatic extension contracture of the elbow.

The efficacy of celecoxib in preventing heterotopic ossification recurrence after open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness in adults

BACKGROUND

Heterotopic ossification (HO) recurrence after joint surgery is always a disturbing problem for patients and surgeons. Our study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of celecoxib in preventing the recurrence of HO after open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 152 patients with stiff elbows caused by post-traumatic HO. After surgery, 77 patients received celecoxib (200 mg once daily) for 28 days, whereas 75 did not. Radiographic evaluation was performed at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine which factors affected HO recurrence.

RESULTS

HO was both more common and more severe in the no-celecoxib group than in the celecoxib group at 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery. A significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative extension (P = .030), flexion (P = .008), and pronation (P = .005); however, no significant difference in postoperative supination was noted (P = .622). Logistic regression analysis showed that taking celecoxib was the protective factor for HO recurrence, whereas overweight (body mass index > 25) and male gender were the risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

A short course of celecoxib aids in the prevention of HO recurrence after open arthrolysis for elbow stiffness in adults and could be an effective and safe option.

Complications of Open Elbow Arthrolysis in Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness: A Systematic Review

Objective

The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature for a more comprehensive understanding of the complications of open elbow arthrolysis in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness and provide a reference for better prevention and treatment of them.

Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched for therapeutic studies with a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from selected articles, and a statistical analysis was performed to evaluate related factors and management of the complications.

Results

Twenty-eight articles published between 1989 and 2013, involving 810 patients, were included. Most of the complications included in the selected articles were nerve complications, heterotopic ossification, elbow instability, infection, pin-related complications and repeat elbow contracture. The total complication rate was 24.3% ± 3.0%, and the reoperation rate was 34.0%. Furthermore, the statistical analysis revealed that preoperative range of motion (β = -0.004, P = 0.01) and proportion of female (β = 0.336, P = 0.04) were the independent factors affecting the total complication rate.

Conclusions

Various risk factors are related to each of the complications, and we found that patients with less preoperative ROM and a higher proportion of female gender may point to a higher total complication rate. Therefore, to further improve the overall outcomes of this procedure, more and larger prospective studies should be performed to further elucidate the effects of prophylactic interventions targeting the risk factors, thus improving the methods of prevention and treatment of complications.

The time point in surgical excision of heterotopic ossification of post-traumatic stiff elbow: recommendation for early excision followed by early exercise

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic heterotopic ossification (HO) around the elbow may severely impair joint function. Although surgical excision is effective at restoring range of motion (ROM), traditional surgical treatment is postponed for at least 1 year to prevent recurrence, which leads to secondary contracture of the elbow. Because the optimal timing of resection is controversial, our study was performed to compare recurrence and elbow function between early and late excision in our patients to determine whether the delay is necessary.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 164 patients during a 4-year period. In the control group (112 patients), HO was excised at an average of 23.0 months after initial injury (range, 9-204 months); in the early excision group (52 patients), resection was performed at an average of 6.1 months (range, 3-8 months). HO recurrence was assessed by the Hastings classification system. Final ROM and Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Recurrent HO was observed in 30 of 112 patients (26.8%) in the control group and 15 of 52 (28.9%) in early excision group. No significant difference in HO recurrence was found between the 2 groups (P = .942). Moreover, there were no notable differences regarding ROM, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores, and complications postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Early excision associated with early exercise is effective for the treatment of HO aiming at a low recurrence rate and satisfactory function. The conventional surgical delay of more than 1 year may be shortened.

Arthrolysis and delayed internal fixation combined with hinged external fixation for elbow stiffness associated with malunion or nonunion of capitellum fracture

BACKGROUND

This study assessed outcomes after treatment of patients with capitellum fracture diagnosed >4 weeks after the trauma (delayed) who presented with stiff elbow.

METHODS

We reviewed 7 patients with stiff elbows after delayed diagnosis of capitellum fractures between February 2007 and February 2012. They were treated with arthrolysis by twin incisions, late open reduction and internal fixation, and a hinged external fixator. According to the Bryan-Morrey-McKee classification, 3 patients had type I capitellum fractures and 4 patients had type IV.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 28 months (range, 24-38 months). The mean delay from the initial trauma was 3.7 months. The flexion arc improved from a preoperative mean of 24° to a postoperative mean of 122°. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score increased from a mean of 56 points to 93 points. Anatomic fracture union occurred in all cases, and there was no secondary displacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthrolysis, late internal fixation, and use of a hinged external fixator can solve problems associated with stiff elbow after delayed diagnosis of capitellum fracture. Combined use of these techniques may be a safe and effective treatment option.

Limited Medial and Lateral Approaches to Treat Stiff Elbows

Open arthrolysis is an effective way to treat elbow stiffness. However, previous approaches led to significant surgical trauma. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the outcome of open arthrolysis with limited medial and lateral approaches combined with hinged external fixation to treat elbow stiffness. A total of 18 patients (18 elbows) with elbow stiffness were retrospectively reviewed. The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were used for all patients. Preoperatively, the mean flexion arc was 43°±28° and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 62 points. Limited medial and lateral approaches were used to provide safe and complete arthrolysis. The other protocols included ulnar nerve transposition, medial epicondyle osteotomy, radial head resection, ligament repair, and hinged external fixation. Patients were encouraged to begin early rehabilitation 24 hours after surgery. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, the flexion arc improved to 130°±11° and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 97 points (15 excellent, 3 good). One patient had elbow instability, but function met the requirements of his daily life. Transient ulnar nerve palsy without infection occurred in 4 patients. With limited medial and lateral approaches, elbow stiffness can be treated effectively with open arthrolysis. This method is trauma controlled. Furthermore, a hinged external fixator can provide sufficient and safe rehabilitation. The use of open arthrolysis with limited medial and lateral approaches combined with hinged external fixation is an effective and safe method to treat elbow stiffness.

Stability of severely stiff elbows after complete open release: treatment by ligament repair with suture anchors and hinged external fixator

BACKGROUND

Instability is a crucial issue in severe post-traumatic elbow stiffness during complete-release surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ligament repair using a suture anchor in the operative treatment of severely stiff elbows for which a hinged external fixator was indicated.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 46 cases of severely stiff elbows (flexion arc <60°) undergoing open release. During the operation, all 46 elbows were noted to have instability. Suture anchors were applied to restore the ligament if it was impossible to repair the ligament directly, and a hinged external fixator was simultaneously applied to protect the vulnerable ligament and facilitate rehabilitation. No allograft or autograft was used in any of our cases. The stability, arc of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, ulnar nerve symptoms, and radiographs were evaluated.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 24.3 months, the postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 91 points, as compared with 63 points preoperatively. The mean flexion arc improved from 25° to 126°. Three patients presented with moderate elbow instability when the hinged external fixator was removed; however, all of them regained stability by the last follow-up. Furthermore, 7 cases of new-onset nerve palsy were noted; however, all of them resolved with conservative management. None of the patients required secondary surgery for any reason.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of an avulsed collateral ligament with suture anchors and hinged external fixation was effective in restoring functional mobility in patients with severe post-traumatic elbow stiffness after complete release. This could be an option for treating ankylosed, severely or very severely stiff elbows.

Delayed-onset ulnar neuritis after release of elbow contractures: clinical presentation, pathological findings, and treatment

BACKGROUND

Little information exists regarding delayed-onset ulnar neuritis (DOUN) after arthroscopic release of elbow contractures.

PURPOSE

To describe, in a large cohort of patients, the clinical presentation of and risk factors for developing DOUN after arthroscopic release of elbow contractures.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 565 consecutive arthroscopic releases of elbow contractures was conducted. Essentially, DOUN was defined as ulnar neuritis or neuropathy, or worsening of pre-existing ulnar nerve symptoms, that developed postoperatively in patients with normal neurological examination findings immediately after surgery. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were met, 235 contracture releases in patients who had not undergone any ulnar nerve surgery remained and were used for the analysis of risk factors with a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (11%) developed DOUN. The patients fell into 1 of 3 distinct groups. Fifteen (58%) presented with rapidly progressive DOUN, characterized by rapidly progressive sensorimotor ulnar neuropathy, increasing pain at the cubital tunnel during end-range flexion and/or extension, and rapidly deteriorating range of motion within the first week after surgery. Urgent ulnar subcutaneous nerve transposition was performed within 1 or 2 days of diagnosis. Eight (31%) presented with nonprogressive DOUN, characterized by mild sensory ulnar neuropathy, neither motor weakness nor substantial pain at the cubital tunnel, or loss of motion. Three (12%) presented with slowly progressive DOUN, characterized by the insidious onset of mild ulnar neuropathy. Significant risk factors for DOUN included a diagnosis of heterotopic ossification (odds ratio, 31; 95% CI, 5-191; P < .001), preoperative neurological symptoms (odds ratio, 6; 95% CI, 2-19; P = .001), and preoperative arc of motion (odds ratio, 0.97 per degree of motion; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Delayed-onset ulnar neuritis is an important complication of arthroscopic release of elbow contractures. We recommend a high index of suspicion and monitoring patients with progressive loss of elbow motion and end-range pain for evidence of subclinical ulnar neuritis.

Is routine ulnar nerve transposition necessary in open release of stiff elbows? Our experience and a literature review

PURPOSE

Prophylactic release of the ulnar nerve to reduce the incidence of postoperative nerve symptoms in stiff elbows has been recommended. However, the necessity for routine anterior transposition remains unclear. In this study, we aim to gain an insight into the value of routine transposition in open release of stiff elbows.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 94 patients suffering from elbow stiffness with no pre-operative ulnar nerve symptoms. Simple decompression (with in situ decompression or epicondylectomy) and subcutaneous anterior transposition were chronologically performed in 53 and 37 patients, respectively. Another four patients were treated by a single lateral approach with no intervention of the ulnar nerve. Pre- and postoperative range of motion and incidence of ulnar nerve symptoms were recorded. The function of ulnar nerve was measured by Amadio rating scale.

RESULTS

The incidence of ulnar nerve dysfuction was 18.9% (ten of 53) and 8.1% (three of 37) in the simple decompression and transposition groups, respectively. The mean Amadio scores were 7.62 and 8.22, respectively. All these data showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). In the lateral approach group, 50 % (two of four) of patients developed nerve symptoms with a mean Amadio score of 6.50.

CONCLUSIONS

The transposition group exhibited a superior nervous outcomes compared with the simple decompression group. No comparison was conducted between the transposition and lateral approach groups because of too few patients in the latter. According to related literature and our experience, we conclude that routine transposition is necessary to prevent postoperative nerve symptoms.

Intrawound application of vancomycin reduces wound infection after open release of post-traumatic stiff elbows: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

With the improvements in wound healing through the use of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics and technical refinements, postoperative elbow infections have become less common but still occur in certain elective elbow surgeries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic application of vancomycin into the operative site to reduce the incidence of infection after the open release of post-traumatic stiff elbows.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 272 such patients during a 4-year period was performed. In the control group (93 patients), simple prophylaxis with standard intravenous antibiotics was performed; in the vancomycin group (179 patients), vancomycin powder was applied directly into the wound before closure along with standard intravenous prophylaxis.

RESULTS

After a follow-up of at least 6 months, the control group was found to have 6 infections (6.45%; confidence interval: 2.40%-13.52%) compared with none (0%; confidence interval: 0-2%.04%) in the vancomycin group, which was a statistically significant difference (P = .0027). No adverse effects were documented from the direct use of the vancomycin powder.

CONCLUSIONS

The local application of vancomycin powder may be a promising means of preventing postoperative elbow infections after elbow release in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

The outcome of open elbow arthrolysis: comparison of four different approaches based on one hundred cases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of elbow arthrolysis according to the surgical approach, durability after arthrolysis and the severity of contracture.

METHODS

The study includes a cohort of 100 consecutive patients treated in our institution between 1986 and 2008. The indication for surgery was loss of mobility. This was the result of fractures, dislocation, simultaneous fracture/dislocation or other non-traumatic causes. All patients underwent open elbow release via one of four approaches (42 lateral, 44 medial, six combined medial-lateral and eight posterior). They were clinically evaluated at a minimum of 24 months after arthrolysis.

RESULTS

The average ranges of elbow extension, flexion and arc of motion had increased significantly at the follow up, respectively, by 20°, 16° and 36°. No significant difference was found with regard to surgical approach. However, we noticed significant deterioration of intra-operative average extension and arc of motion (AOM) over the follow up period, respectively, by 13° and 14°. The number of patients with AOM of 100° or more increased from three patients preoperatively to 28 postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Open elbow arthrolysis is a successful method of treatment of elbow contracture. Results are durable, but there is some postoperative deterioration of extension gained during surgery. We may anticipate that at the final stage we shall obtain an average of 86% of intra-operative arc of motion. Patients with the most severe contractures have the best gains.

Open arthrolysis and hinged external fixation for posttraumatic ankylosed elbows

BACKGROUND

An ankylosed elbow is defined as an elbow having a range of motion of 0°. Movement is extremely limited. This study retrospectively analyzes the results of arthrolysis and hinged external fixation performed on 15 patients suffering from ankylosed elbows.

METHODS

Fifteen completely ankylosed elbows were treated by arthrolysis and hinged external fixation. Patients comprised nine men and six women, with a mean age of 37.93 years (37.93 ± 9.68) when arthrolysis was performed. Before surgery, the elbows were ankylosed at various angles ranging from 30° to 85°. Eleven patients underwent arthrolysis by medial and lateral approaches, three patients by the posterior approach, and one patient by posterior and lateral approaches. Hinged external fixators were applied to all patients. Subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve was performed in all patients.

RESULT

All patients received satisfactory follow-up. The range of motion of the elbow improved from 0° preoperatively to a postoperative mean of 115.67° (115.67 ± 23.29). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from a mean of 67.67 ± 11.00 to 86.67 ± 8.38 points, with excellent results in nine patients, good in five, and fair in one. This difference is statistically significant (t = -6.862; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Open arthrolysis and monolateral hinged external fixation are effective in treating posttraumatic ankylosed elbow. Arthrolysis should be performed by a combination of lateral and medial approaches. In addition, routine hinged external fixation and anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve may improve the postoperative recovery of elbow stiffness.

Open arthrolysis and prosthetic replacement of the radial head for elbow stiffness associated with rotation limitation

BACKGROUND

Limited forearm rotation is a frequent combined disorder in elbow stiffness. If the radial head cannot be saved during open arthrolysis, prosthetic replacement might be considered because it enhances stability and allows early motion.

METHODS

In this study we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 8 patients (7 men, 1 woman) who underwent open arthrolysis and simultaneous prosthetic replacement after resection of the radial head to restore elbow range of motion and forearm rotation. Patients were a mean age of 31.7 years (range, 22-40 years).

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the mean (range) active range of motion improved from 29.4° (0°-70°) to 113.1° (80°-135°), mean (range) supination increased from 38.8° (0°-80°) to 77.5° (50°-90°), and mean (range) pronation improved from 18.8° (0°-80°) to 68.8° (50°-80°). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from a mean (range) of 57.5 (50-70) to 92.5 (85-100) points. No elbow valgus instability was detected over a mean duration of 26 months of follow-up. The implant was considered stable in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Open arthrolysis and prosthetic replacement of the radial head are effective in treating elbow stiffness with associated rotation limitation after resection of the radial head.