Patterns of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation: The A2ALL Experience

Recipient 3-Hepatic Vein Technique with Graft Venoplasty to Maximize Venous Outflow in Left Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Background

Augmentation of hepatic venous outflow is crucial in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to maximize functional graft size and prevent venous complications. We present details of our outflow augmentation technique for left lobe grafts (LLG) in adult LDLTs, which uses all recipient 3 hepatic veins and venoplasty of graft left and middle hepatic veins. This study examines the effectiveness of our technique in preventing outflow complications and the correlation between anatomical variations of the graft hepatic veins and surgical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients who underwent LLG-LDLT between 2012 and 2023. The patients were classified into 3 groups based on the graft hepatic vein anatomy and usage of venoplasty: group 1 (n = 10, common trunk without venoplasty), group 2 (n = 62, common trunk with venoplasty), and group 3 (n = 16, no common trunk with venoplasty).

Results

No patient developed clinically significant venous outflow complications or graft loss related to venous outflow. There were no significant differences in complication rates or ascites production among the groups. Five-year graft survival was comparable among the groups (P = 0.43). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the model for end-stage liver disease score was the only independent risk factor for increased ascites after transplant (standardized beta, 0.546; t value,4.20; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.287-0.804), but anatomical variations of the graft hepatic veins did not influence ascites output.

Conclusions

The recipient 3 hepatic vein outflow augmentation technique with graft venoplasty can be applied to various graft hepatic venous anatomy and effectively prevents outflow-related graft loss in LLG-LDLT.

Graft Inflow Modulation by Splenic Artery Ligation for Portal Hyperperfusion Does Not Decrease Rates of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to compare the rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing elective adult live donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) with and without graft portal inflow modulation (GIM) for portal hyperperfusion. The secondary objectives were to compare time to normalization of bilirubin and International Normalized Ratio, day 14 ascitic output more than 1 L, small-for-size syndrome, intensive care unit/high dependency unit and total hospital stay, and 90-day morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND

GIM can prevent EAD in ALDLT patients with portal hyperperfusion.

METHODS

A single-center randomized trial with and without GIM for portal hyperperfusion by splenic artery ligation (SAL) in ALDLT was performed. After reperfusion, patients with portal venous pressure (PVP)>15 mm Hg with a gradient (PVP-central venous pressure) of ≥7 mm Hg and/or portal venous flow (PVF) >250 mL/min/100 g of liver were randomized into 2 groups: GIM and No GIM.

RESULTS

75 of 209 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 38 underwent GIM. Baseline PVF and PVP were comparable between the GIM and no GIM groups. SAL significantly reduced the PVF and PVP ( P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes between the 2 groups. In the subgroup analysis, with a Graft to Recipient Weight Ratio ≤0.8, there were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

SAL significantly decreased PVP and PVF but did not decrease rates of EAD in adult LDLT.

Definition, Prognosis, and Complication Analysis of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The definition of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) varies, and has hardly been studied in pediatric transplantation (pLT) since the adult EAD definition is not easily applicable to pLT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive pLT patients aged <18 at the Department of Pediatric Transplantation of Tianjin First Central Hospital from April 2013 to December 2022. The definition of EAD explored in this study is (1) international normalized ratio ≥2.8 on day 1 and aspartate aminotransferase >1500 IU/mL within the first 7 days or (2) total bilirubin ≥5 mg/dL on day 7. The overall survival of patients and graft survival at 90 days after surgery were compared between this new definition and the adult EAD definition.

RESULTS

A total of 1620 pLT recipients were included in the study, of which 179 (11.0 %) recipients met the new definition of EAD for pLT. Twenty-five (13.97 %) died and 37 (20.67 %) graft lost within 90 days. The RR_death under Olthoff's EAD definition and our EAD definition are 3.45 and 9.57, respectively; The RR_graft_loss under Olthoff's EAD definition and our EAD definition are 4.18 and 11.48, respectively. A total of 97 (18.98 %) of 511 recipients who received deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) met the new definition of EAD, 18 (18.56 %) died and 29 (29.90 %) graft lost within 90 days. In DDLT group, the RR_death under Olthoff's EAD definition and our EAD definition are 2.29 and 10.98, respectively; The RR_graft_loss under Olthoff's EAD definition and our EAD definition are 2.34 and 11.24, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The broadly used Olthoff's EAD definition in adult liver transplantation is unsuitable for pLT use. The EAD definition established in this study is more suitable for patients <18 years old who received pLT, especially those <18 years old who received DDLT.

Impacts of high mobility group box protein 1 gene polymorphisms on morbidity and mortality after living donor liver transplantation

We investigated the effect of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) gene on morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation (LT). Among 120 LT recipients and their living donors, the genotypes of HMGB1, and the SNPs rs2249825, rs1045411, rs1412125, and rs1360485 were determined. There were no significant associations between these four SNPs and the incidence of rejection or mortality. However, the incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) (n = 43), which presents as functional insufficiency within 1 week of LT, was significantly higher in recipients with the GC + CC allele of rs2249825 (n = 17/34) than in those with the GG allele (n = 26/86) (p = 0.044). Although the impact of donor HMGB1 SNPs on the incidence of EAD was not statistically significant, recipients with the GC + CC allele of rs2249825 who received liver grafts from donors with the same genotype had the highest incidence of EAD (p = 0.052). In contrast, the donor TC + CC allele of rs1412125 was an independent risk factor for the development of sepsis (n = 33) in LT recipient (OR = 3.05, 95 % CI = 1.18-7.87, p = 0.021). Thus, the SNPs of the HMGB1 gene in either recipients or donors were not associated with mortality but influenced the incidence of EAD and sepsis, likely being a predictive biomarker for the risk of serious complications after LT.

Small for Size Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation- Prevention and Management

Small-for-size syndrome is a clinical syndrome of early allograft dysfunction usually following living donor liver transplantation due to a mismatch between recipient metabolic and functional requirements and the graft's functional capacity. While graft size relative to the recipient size is the most commonly used parameter to predict risk, small-for-size syndrome is multifactorial and its development depends on a number of inter-dependant factors only some of which are modifiable. Intra-operative monitoring of portal haemodynamics and portal flow modulation is widely recommended though there is wide variation in clinical practice. Management of established small-for-size syndrome centres around meticulous patient care, infection prevention, fluid management and identifying correctable technical complications. However, retransplantation is the only treatment in severe cases. While small-for-size syndrome per se is associated with increased peri-operative mortality, the contribution of non-hepatic organ failure in determining patient outcomes needs further studies.

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Monitoring and Prediction of Early Allograft Dysfunction Following Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Multiple intraoperative hemodynamic parameters are associated with an increased risk of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, there is significant center-to-center variability in terms of which parameters are used. We sought to determine which intraoperative hemodynamic parameters are most predictive of EAD following LDLT.

METHODS

This is a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023409711). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to compare predictive parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 4399 articles were identified from 3 large, international databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science). Eighteen articles fit the inclusion criteria. The most commonly evaluated hemodynamic parameter was the postreperfusion portal venous pressure (PVP). A postreperfusion PVP of <15-20 mmHg was consistently associated with lower rates of EAD and, in some cases, improvements in patient survival. Other hemodynamic parameters evaluated included portal venous flow, hepatic arterial flow, portal venous velocities, and the hyperperfusion index.

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamic measurements indicative of portal hyperperfusion, especially elevated PVP, have been consistently associated with the development of EAD. Intraoperative hemodynamics should be monitored on all LDLT recipients, with portal inflow modulation procedures indicated if portal hyperperfusion is present.

Validation of a Pretransplant Risk Prediction Model for Early Allograft Dysfunction After Living-donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) affects outcomes in liver transplantation (LT). Existing risk models developed for deceased-donor LT depend on posttransplant factors and fall short in living-donor LT (LDLT), where pretransplant evaluations are crucial for preventing EAD and justifying the donor's risks.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from 2944 adult patients who underwent LDLT at 17 centers between 2016 and 2020. We developed a logistic regression model to predict EAD based on this development cohort. We used data from 1020 patients at the King Faisal Transplant Center for external validation.

RESULTS

In the development cohort, 321 patients (10.9%) experienced EAD. These patients had poorer health status, more liver decompensation, and higher requirements of hospitalization than those without EAD. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent pretransplant predictors of EAD: laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.09), the necessity for hospitalization at the time of transplant (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.00-3.30), and graft weight in kilogram (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.17-0.45). Using these predictors, we developed the model for EAD after LDLT, which demonstrated strong discriminative ability in the development cohort with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68-0.74). The model maintained high discrimination during internal validation (AUC, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67-0.73) and showed a modest reduction in discriminative power in external validation (AUC, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.61-0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

EAD post-LDLT is influenced by the recipient's pretransplant health condition and the graft weight. Integrating the model for EAD after LDLT into the pretransplant process of pairing donors and recipients can enhance the safety and efficacy of LDLT.

Role of the Lymphocyte Count-to-C-Reactive Protein Ratio in the Risk Stratification for High EASE Scores After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Background: Early allograft failure (EAF) significantly contributes to mortality, necessitating re-transplantation following liver transplantation. The EAF simplified estimation (EASE) score has been recently developed to predict EAF. We aimed to assess the predictive capacity of high EASE scores for EAF and postoperative outcomes and to evaluate the association between the lymphocyte count-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) and high EASE scores after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 808 patients who underwent LDLT. After excluding 16 patients with incomplete laboratory data, the final cohort included 792 patients. Patients with EASE scores ≥-0.74 were categorized into the high EASE group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between the LCR and high EASE scores. Results: High EASE scores demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for EAF development relative to that of the early allograft dysfunction (EAD) model (p = 0.018) and were more closely associated with overall mortality (p = 0.033). A preoperative LCR < 12.7 significantly increased the odds (odds ratio, 3.3; confidence interval, 1.997-5.493) of exhibiting high EASE scores post-LDLT, alongside preoperative hematocrit levels, operative duration, intraoperative continuous renal replacement therapy, administered calcium dose, mean heart rate, and donor age. Conclusions: The EASE score could offer enhanced utility for predicting EAF and overall mortality following LDLT relative to that of EAD. Identifying and managing risk factors, including low LCR values, for elevated EASE scores is essential for improving patient prognoses.

Retransplantation in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

The need for retransplantation after living donor liver transplantation can occur early, mainly because of technical difficulties such as hepatic artery thrombosis or as a result of early allograft dysfunction as a symptom of small-for-size syndrome. Patients with autoimmune diseases may develop progressive graft failure from recurrent disease. The ethics of retransplantation can be complicated by the cause of the initial liver disease, which may be self-inflicted or the outcome of malignancy. This is especially true in countries without the availability of deceased donors for salvage, and a second living donor would be needed. Nevertheless, patients who experience early or late graft failure should be considered for retransplant if they are deemed acceptable candidates. When a living donor is required for retransplant, the equipoise between donor risk and autonomy and recipient outcome should be considered.

An integrated proteomics and metabolomics approach to assess graft quality and predict early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT) and is associated with poor prognosis. Graft itself plays a major role in the development of EAD. We aimed to reveal the EAD-specific molecular profiles to assess graft quality and establish EAD predictive models.

METHODS

A total of 223 patients who underwent LT were enrolled and divided into training ( n =73) and validation ( n =150) sets. In the training set, proteomics was performed on graft biopsies, together with metabolomics on paired perfusates. Differential expression, enrichment analysis, and protein-protein interaction network were used to identify the key molecules and pathways involved. EAD predictive models were constructed using machine learning and verified in the validation set.

RESULTS

A total of 335 proteins were differentially expressed between the EAD and non-EAD groups. These proteins were significantly enriched in triglyceride and glycerophospholipid metabolism, neutrophil degranulation, and the MET-related signaling pathway. The top 12 graft proteins involved in the aforementioned processes were identified, including GPAT1, LPIN3, TGFB1, CD59, and SOS1. Moreover, downstream metabolic products, such as lactate dehydrogenase, interleukin-8, triglycerides, and the phosphatidylcholine/phosphorylethanolamine ratio in the paired perfusate displayed a close relationship with the graft proteins. To predict the occurrence of EAD, an integrated model using perfusate metabolic products and clinical parameters showed areas under the curve of 0.915 and 0.833 for the training and validation sets, respectively. It displayed superior predictive efficacy than that of currently existing models, including donor risk index and D-MELD scores.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified novel biomarkers in both grafts and perfusates that could be used to assess graft quality and provide new insights into the etiology of EAD. Herein, we also offer a valid tool for the early prediction of EAD.

The adverse impact of perioperative body composition abnormalities on outcomes after split liver transplantation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Split liver transplantation (SLT) increases graft availability, but it's safe and effective utilization is insufficiently documented. This study aimed to investigate the association between perioperative body composition abnormalities and outcomes in adult SLT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred forty recipients who underwent SLT in three centers were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Body composition abnormalities including sarcopenia, myosteatosis, visceral obesity, and sarcopenic obesity were evaluated at baseline and 1 month after surgery using computed tomography. Their impact on outcomes including early allograft dysfunction, early complications, ICU stay, graft regeneration rate, and survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

Recipients with sarcopenia or myosteatosis had a higher risk of early allograft dysfunction, higher early complication rate, and longer length of ICU stay (all P <0.05), while there was no difference in graft regeneration rate. Recipient and graft survival were significantly worse for recipients with body composition abnormalities (all P <0.05). In multivariable Cox-regression analysis, sarcopenia [hazard ratio (HR)=1.765, P =0.015], myosteatosis (HR=2.066, P =0.002), and visceral obesity (HR=1.863, P =0.008) were independently associated with shorter overall survival. Piling up of the three factors increased the mortality risk stepwise ( P <0.001). Recipients experienced skeletal muscle loss and muscle fat infiltration 1 month after surgery. Postoperative worsening sarcopenia (HR=2.359, P =0.009) and myosteatosis (HR=1.878, P =0.026) were also identified as independent risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia, myosteatosis, and their progression negatively affect outcomes including early allograft dysfunction, early complications, ICU stay and survival after SLT. Systemic evaluation and dynamic monitoring of body composition are valuable.

Ferroptosis: a new target for hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury?

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) can seriously affect graft survival and prognosis and is an unavoidable event during liver transplantation. Ferroptosis is a novel iron-dependent form of cell death characterized by iron accumulation and overwhelming lipid peroxidation; it differs morphologically, genetically, and biochemically from other well-known cell death types (autophagy, necrosis, and apoptosis). Accumulating evidence has shown that ferroptosis is involved in the pathogenesis of hepatic IRI, and targeting ferroptosis may be a promising therapeutic approach. Here, we review the pathways and phenomena involved in ferroptosis, explore the associations and implications of ferroptosis and hepatic IRI, and discuss possible strategies for modulating ferroptosis to alleviate the hepatic IRI.

Outcomes of living donor liver transplant recipients receiving grafts with the graft-to-recipient weight ratio less than 0.6%: A matched pair analysis

We sometimes experience living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) involving very small grafts with graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) < 0.6% when the actual graft size is smaller than predicted. The outcomes in this situation have not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to determine the graft outcomes of LDLT with GRWR < 0.6%. We retrospectively reviewed 280 cases of adult LDLT performed at our institution between January 2000 and March 2021. In our institution, the lower limit for graft volume/standard liver volume ratio was 30%. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the cutoff value of 0.6% for actual GRWR. Graft survival and surgical outcomes, including small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), were compared between the groups using propensity score matching analysis. Risk factors associated with SFSS in recipients with GRWR < 0.6% were also evaluated. Fifty-nine patients received grafts with GRWR < 0.6%. After propensity score matching, similar graft survival rates were observed for GRWR < 0.6% (n = 53) and GRWR ≥ 0.6% (n = 53) ( p = 0.98). However, patients with GRWR < 0.6% had a significantly worse 3-month graft survival rate (86.8% vs. 98.1%, p = 0.03) and higher incidence of SFSS ( p < 0.001) than patients with GRWR ≥0.6%. On multivariate analysis, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and donor age were associated with SFSS in patients with GRWR < 0.6%. The same factors were also associated with graft survival. In conclusion, although similar overall graft survival rates were observed for LDLT with GRWR < 0.6% and GRWR ≥ 0.6%, GRWR < 0.6% was associated with an increased risk of SFSS. Appropriate donor and recipient selection is important for successful LDLT with very small grafts.

Sevoflurane preconditioning in living liver donation is associated with better initial graft function after pediatric transplantation: a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Initial allograft function determines the patient's immediate prognosis in pediatric liver transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion injuries play a role in initial poor graft function (IPGF). In animal studies, preconditioning with inhaled anesthetic agents has demonstrated a protective effect on the liver. In humans, the few available studies are conflicting. This study assesses the association between the hypnotic agent used to maintain anesthesia during hepatectomy in living donors and the occurrence of IPGF after pediatric transplantation.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of children who received a living donor liver transplant (LDLT) between 2010 and 2019. We analyzed the incidence of EAD according to the hypnotic agent used to maintain general anesthesia during donor hepatectomy.

RESULTS

We included 183 pairs of patients (living donors-recipients). The anesthetics used in the donor were propofol (n = 85), sevoflurane (n = 69), or propofol with sevoflurane started 30 min before clamping (n = 29). Forty-two children (23%) developed IPGF. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors significantly associated with the occurrence of IPGF were the anesthesia maintenance agent used in the donor (p = 0.004), age of the donor (p = 0.03), duration of transplant surgery (p = 0.009), preoperative receiver neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.02), and albumin (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Significantly fewer children who received a graft from a donor in whom only sevoflurane was used to maintain anesthesia developed IPGF. Although additional research is needed, this preconditioning strategy may provide an option to prevent IPGF after living liver donation.

e-GLR Score Predicts Early Graft Loss in Adult Live-Donor Liver Transplantation

Objective

This study aimed to analyze risk factors and develop a predictive model for early allograft loss due to early graft dysfunction (EGD) in adult live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods

Data of patients who underwent LDLT from 2011 to 2019 were reviewed for EGD, associated factors, and outcomes. A homogeneous group of 387 patients was analyzed: random cohort A (n = 274) for primary analysis and random cohort B (n = 113) for validation.

Results

Of 274 recipients, 92 (33.6%) developed EGD. The risk of graft loss within 90 days was 29.3% and 7.1% in those with and without EGD, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined donor age (P = 0.045), estimated (e) graft weight (P = 0.001), and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (0.001) as independent predictors of early graft loss due to EGD. Regression coefficients of these factors were employed to formulate the risk model: Predicted (P) early graft loss risk (e-GLR) score = 10 × [(donor age × 0.052) + (e-Graft weight × 1.681) + (MELD × 0.145)] - 8.606 (e-Graft weight = 0, if e-Graft weight ≥640 g and e-Graft weight = 1, and if e-Graft weight < 640 g). Internal cross-validation revealed a high predictive value (C-statistic = 0.858).

Conclusions

Our novel risk score can efficiently predict early allograft loss following graft dysfunction, which enables donor-recipient matching, evaluation, and prognostication simply and reliably in adult LDLT.

Liver transplantation in Latin America: reality and challenges

Healthcare systems in Latin America are broadly heterogeneous, but all of them are burdened by a dramatic rise in liver disease. Some challenges that these countries face include an increase in patients requiring a transplant, insufficient rates of organ donation, delayed referral, and inequitable or suboptimal access to liver transplant programs and post-transplant care. This could be improved by expanding the donor pool through the implementation of education programs for citizens and referring physicians, as well as the inclusion of extended criteria donors, living donors and split liver transplantation. Addressing these shortcomings will require national shifts aimed at improving infrastructure, increasing awareness of organ donation, training medical personnel, and providing equitable access to care for all patients.

Preventing Small-for-size Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT), with up to 20% developing this following living donor LT (LDLT). Preventing SFSS involves consideration of factors before the surgical procedure, including donor and recipient selection, and factors during the surgical procedure, including adequate outflow reconstruction, graft portal inflow modulation, and management of portosystemic shunts. International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplant Society of India Consensus Conference was convened in January 2023 to develop recommendations for the prediction and management of SFSS in LDLT. The format of the conference was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. International experts in this field were allocated to 4 working groups (diagnosis, prevention, anesthesia, and critical care considerations, and management of established SFSS). The working groups prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. The working group members, independent panel, and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and evidence-based recommendations provided by working group 2 that can be implemented to prevent SFSS in LDLT patients.

Post Living Donor Liver Transplantation Small-for-size Syndrome: Definitions, Timelines, Biochemical, and Clinical Factors for Diagnosis: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

BACKGROUND

When a partial liver graft is unable to meet the demands of the recipient, a clinical phenomenon, small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), may ensue. Clear definition, diagnosis, and management are needed to optimize transplant outcomes.

METHODS

A Consensus Scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on specific aspects of SFSS, recommendations underwent blinded review by an independent panel, and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at the Consensus Conference.

RESULTS

The ideal graft-to-recipient weight ratio of ≥0.8% (or graft volume standard liver volume ratio of ≥40%) is recommended. It is also recommended to measure portal pressure or portal blood flow during living donor liver transplantation and maintain a postreperfusion portal pressure of <15 mm Hg and/or portal blood flow of <250 mL/min/100 g graft weight to optimize outcomes. The typical time point to diagnose SFSS is the postoperative day 7 to facilitate treatment and intervention. An objective 3-grade stratification of severity for protocolized management of SFSS is proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed grading system based on clinical and biochemical factors will help clinicians in the early identification of patients at risk of developing SFSS and institute timely therapeutic measures. The validity of this newly created grading system should be evaluated in future prospective studies.

Management of Established Small-for-size Syndrome in Post Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Medical, Radiological, and Surgical Interventions: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) following living donor liver transplantation is a complication that can lead to devastating outcomes such as prolonged poor graft function and possibly graft loss. Because of the concern about the syndrome, some transplants of mismatched grafts may not be performed. Portal hyperperfusion of a small graft and hyperdynamic splanchnic circulation are recognized as main pathogenic factors for the syndrome. Management of established SFSS is guided by the severity of the presentation with the initial focus on pharmacological therapy to modulate portal flow and provide supportive care to the patient with the goal of facilitating graft regeneration and recovery. When medical management fails or condition progresses with impending dysfunction or even liver failure, interventional radiology (IR) and/or surgical interventions to reduce portal overperfusion should be considered. Although most patients have good outcomes with medical, IR, and/or surgical management that allow graft regeneration, the risk of graft loss increases dramatically in the setting of bilirubin >10 mg/dL and INR>1.6 on postoperative day 7 or isolated bilirubin >20 mg/dL on postoperative day 14. Retransplantation should be considered based on the overall clinical situation and the above postoperative laboratory parameters. The following recommendations focus on medical and IR/surgical management of SFSS as well as considerations and timing of retransplantation when other therapies fail.

Left Lobe First With Purely Laparoscopic Approach: A Novel Strategy to Maximize Donor Safety in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate outcome of left-lobe graft (LLG) first combined with purely laparoscopic donor hemihepatectomy (PLDH) as a strategy to minimize donor risk.

BACKGROUND

An LLG first approach and a PLDH are 2 methods used to reduce surgical stress for donors in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). But the risk associated with application LLG first combined with PLDH is not known.

METHODS

From 2012 to 2023, 186 adult LDLTs were performed with hemiliver grafts, procured by open surgery in 95 and PLDH in 91 cases. LLGs were considered first when graft-to-recipient weight ratio ≥0.6%. Following a 4-month adoption process, all donor hepatectomies, since December 2019, were performed laparoscopically.

RESULTS

There was one intraoperative conversion to open (1%). Mean operative times were similar in laparoscopic and open cases (366 vs 371 minutes). PLDH provided shorter hospital stays, lower blood loss, and lower peak aspartate aminotransferase. Peak bilirubin was lower in LLG donors compared with right-lobe graft donors (1.4 vs 2.4 mg/dL, P < 0.01), and PLDH further improved the bilirubin levels in LLG donors (1.2 vs 1.6 mg/dL, P < 0.01). PLDH also afforded a low rate of early complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II, 8% vs 22%, P = 0.007) and late complications, including incisional hernia (0% vs 13.7%, P < 0.001), compared with open cases. LLG was more likely to have a single duct than a right-lobe graft (89% vs 60%, P < 0.01). Importantly, with the aggressive use of LLG in 47% of adult LDLT, favorable graft survival was achieved without any differences between the type of graft and surgical approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The LLG first with PLDH approach minimizes surgical stress for donors in adult LDLT without compromising recipient outcomes. This strategy can lighten the burden for living donors, which could help expand the donor pool.

Imaging Evaluation of the Living Liver Donor: A Systems-Based Approach

Liver transplant is the definitive treatment of end-stage liver disease and early hepatocellular carcinoma. The number of liver transplant surgeries done is highly affected by the number and availability of deceased donor organs. Living donor liver transplantation has emerged as an alternative source of donors, increasing the availability of organs for transplant. Many factors must be considered when choosing living donor candidates to maintain a high level of donor safety and organ survival. To that end, potential donors undergo a rigorous pre-donation workup.

Synergy of 5-aminolevulinate supplement and CX3CR1 suppression promotes liver regeneration via elevated IGF-1 signaling

Inadequate remnant volume and regenerative ability of the liver pose life-threatening risks to patients after partial liver transplantation (PLT) or partial hepatectomy (PHx), while few clinical treatments focus on safely accelerating regeneration. Recently, we discovered that supplementing 5-aminolevulinate (5-ALA) improves liver cold adaptation and functional recovery, leading us to uncover a correlation between 5-ALA metabolic activities and post-PLT recovery. In a mouse 2/3 PHx model, 5-ALA supplements enhanced liver regeneration, promoting infiltration and polarization of anti-inflammatory macrophages via P53 signaling. Intriguingly, chemokine receptor CX3CR1 functions to counterbalance these effects. Genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of CX3CR1 (AZD8797; phase II trial candidate) augmented the macrophagic production of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and subsequent hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) production by hepatic stellate cells. Thus, short-term treatments with both 5-ALA and AZD8797 demonstrated pro-regeneration outcomes superior to 5-ALA-only treatments in mice after PHx. Overall, our findings may inspire safe and effective strategies to better treat PLT and PHx patients.

Early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation-current concepts and future directions

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) after liver transplantation is a significant clinical problem that negatively impacts graft and patient outcomes. The rising incidence of EAD and what it means concerning living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an area of great interest. However, EAD after LDLT is a complex research topic yet to be reviewed comprehensively. Most of the literature on EAD is based on experience in deceased donor liver transplantation, and limited information is available in the context of LDLT. Thus, in this review, we present an overview of EAD after LDLT and have attempted to present balanced points of view on all its aspects, such as definitions, pathogenesis, risk factors, predictive markers, and management. The review aims to broadly overview the nature and extent of ongoing research evidence on this complex topic and inform practice in the field by identifying key concepts and knowledge gaps and highlighting areas that require further inquiry.

Advances and innovations in living donor liver transplant techniques, matching and surgical training: Meeting report from the living donor liver transplant consensus conference

The practice of LDLT currently delivers limited impact in western transplant centers. The American Society of Transplantation organized a virtual consensus conference in October 2021 to identify barriers and gaps to LDLT growth, and to provide evidence-based recommendations to foster safe expansion of LDLT in the United States. This article reports the findings and recommendations regarding innovations and advances in approaches to donor-recipient matching challenges, the technical aspects of the donor and recipient operations, and surgical training. Among these themes, the barriers deemed most influential/detrimental to LDLT expansion in the United States included: (1) prohibitive issues related to donor age, graft size, insufficient donor remnant, and ABO incompatibility; (2) lack of acknowledgment and awareness of the excellent outcomes and benefits of LDLT; (3) ambiguous messaging regarding LDLT to patients and hospital leadership; and (4) a limited number of proficient LDLT surgeons across the United States. Donor-recipient mismatching may be circumvented by way of liver paired exchange. The creation of a national registry to generate granular data on donor-recipient matching will guide the practice of liver paired exchange. The surgical challenges to LDLT are addressed herein and focuses on the development of robust training pathways resulting in proficiency in donor and recipient surgery. Utilizing strong mentorship/collaboration programs with novel training practices under the auspices of established training and certification bodies will add to the breadth and depth of training.

Pathogenic factors of cognitive dysfunction after liver transplantation: an observational study

OBJECTIVES

Neurocognitive complications significantly reduce long-term health-related quality of life in patients undergoing liver transplantation; however, few studies have focused on their perioperative cognitive status. The authors designed a prospective observational study to determine the incidence and risk factors of posttransplant cognitive dysfunction.

METHODS

This study included patients with end-stage liver disease who were on the liver transplantation waiting list. We performed an investigation with a neuropsychological battery before and 1 week after the successful transplant, analyzed the changes, and further explored the complicated perioperative factors that contribute to cognitive dysfunction.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients completed all the investigations. Compared with healthy controls and preoperative cognitive performance, 54 patients experienced deterioration, 50 patients remained unchanged, and 28 patients showed rapid improvement. Logistic regression analysis showed that age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI, 1.07-1.22), P  < 0.001], the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score [OR = 1.07, 95% CI (1.03-1.13), P  = 0.038], systemic circulation pressure [OR = 0.95, 95% CI (0.91-0.99), P  = 0.026] within the first 30 min after portal vein opening, and total bilirubin concentration [OR = 1.02, 95% CI (1.01-1.03), P  = 0.036] on the seventh day post-transplant were closely related to the deterioration of cognitive function.

CONCLUSION

The incidences of deterioration, maintenance, and improvement in cognitive function were 40.9%, 37.9%, and 21.2%, respectively. Increasing age, higher MELD score, lower perfusion pressure in the early stage of the new liver, and higher total bilirubin concentration postoperatively may be independent pathogenic factors.

Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and lactate level during surgery predict acute kidney injury and early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) are common and clinically important complications after liver transplantation. Serum lactate level at the end of surgery could predict EAD and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is known as a biomarker for AKI after liver transplantation. The authors investigated whether the combination of these two laboratory tests could be used as an early predictor of these two complications of EAD and AKI. We reviewed cases undergoing living donor liver transplantation (n = 353). Lactate-adjusted NGAL level, a combination of these two predictors, was calculated as the sum of each value multiplied by the odds ratio for EAD or AKI. We evaluated whether this combined predictor at the end of surgery is significantly associated with both postoperative AKI or EAD. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between our multivariable regression models with and without NGAL, lactate, or lactate-adjusted NGAL. NGAL, lactate and lactate-adjusted NGAL are significant predictors for EAD and AKI. The regression model for EAD or AKI including lactate-adjusted NGAL showed a greater AUC (for EAD: odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.91; for AKI: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.92) compared to the AUC of the models including lactate (for EAD: OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.88; for AKI: OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.83) or NGAL alone (for EAD: OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.86; for AKI: OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.88) or the model without lactate or NGAL (for EAD: OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.58-0.69, for AKI: OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.79). In conclusion, lactate-adjusted NGAL level at the end of surgery could be a reliable combined laboratory predictor for postoperative EAD or AKI after liver transplantation with a greater discriminative ability than lactate or NGAL alone.

Impact of Older Donor Age on Recipient and Graft Survival After LDLT: The US Experience

BACKGROUND

The impact of selecting older donors for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States is incompletely studied, particularly in light of the recent expansion of LDLT nationally.

METHODS

Adult LDLTs from January 01, 2005 to December 31, 2019 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Multivariable Cox models evaluated living donor (LD) age as a predictor of LDLT recipient and graft survival. The impact of increasing donor age on recipient outcomes was compared between LD and deceased donor recipients. Donor postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 3539 LDLTs at 65 transplant centers during the study period. Despite the recent expansion of LDLT, the proportion of LDs aged ≥50 y was stable. There were no clinically significant differences in recipient or donor characteristics by LD age group. LD age ≥50 y was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.49 ( P = 0.012) for recipient survival and 1.61 ( P < 0.001) for graft survival (vs LDs aged 18-29 y). The negative impact of increasing donor age on graft survival was more profound after LDLT than deceased donor liver transplantation (interaction P = 0.019). There was a possible increased rate of early donor biliary complications for donors >55 y (7.1% versus 3.1% for age <40 y; P = 0.156).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing LD age is associated with decreased recipient and graft survival, although older donors still largely yield acceptable outcomes. Donor outcomes were not clearly impacted by increasing age, though this warrants further study.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation With Augmented Venous Outflow and Splenectomy: A Promised Land for Small Left Lobe Grafts

OBJECTIVE

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using small grafts, especially left lobe grafts (H1234-MHV) (LLG), continues to be a challenge due to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). We herein demonstrate that with surgical modifications, outcomes with small grafts can be improved.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2020, we performed 130 adult LDLT using 61 (47%) LLG (H1234-MHV) in a single Enterprise. The median graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 0.84%, with graft-to-recipient weight ratio <0.7% accounting for 22%. Splenectomy was performed in 72 (56%) patients for inflow modulation before (n=50) or after (n=22) graft reperfusion. In LLG-LDLT, venous outflow was achieved using all three recipient hepatic veins. In right lobe graft (H5678) (RLG)-LDLT, the augmented graft right hepatic vein was anastomosed to the recipient's cava with a large cavotomy. Outcome measures include SFSS, early allograft dysfunction (EAD), and survival.

RESULTS

Graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 94%, 90%, and 83%, respectively, with no differences between LLG (H1234-MHV) and RLG (H5678). Splenectomy significantly reduced portal flow without increasing the complication rate. Despite the aggressive use of small grafts, SFSS and EAD developed in only 1 (0.8%) and 18 (13.8%) patients, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression revealed model for end-stage liver disease score and LLG (H1234-MHV) as independent risk factors for EAD and splenectomy as a protective factor (odds ratio: 0.09; P =0.03). For LLG (H1234-MHV)-LDLT, patients who underwent prereperfusion splenectomy tended to have better 1-year graft survival than those receiving postreperfusion splenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

LLG (H1234-MHV) are feasible in adult LDLT with excellent outcomes comparable to RLG (H5678). Venous outflow augmentation and splenectomy help lower the threshold of using small-for-size grafts without compromising graft survival.

Postoperative serum myoglobin as a predictor of early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation

Background

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is a common postliver transplant complication that has been associated with graft failure and risk for poor prognosis. There are many risk factors for the incidence of EAD after liver transplantation (LT). This study investigated whether elevated postoperative myoglobin (Mb) increases the incidence of EAD in liver transplanted recipients.

Methods

A total of 150 adult recipients who measured Mb within 3 days after liver transplantation between June 2019 and June 2021 were evaluated. Then, all patients were divided into two groups: the EAD group and the non-EAD group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were constructed.

Results

The incidence of EAD was 53 out of 150 patients (35.3%) in our study. Based on the multivariate logistic analysis, the risk of EAD increased with elevated postoperative Mb (OR = 1.001, 95% CI 1.000–1.001, P = 0.002). The Mb AUC was 0.657, and it was 0.695 when combined with PCT. When the subgroup analysis was conducted, the AUC of serum Mb prediction was better in patients whose preoperative model for end-stage liver disease score  ≤ 15 or operative time ≥ 10 h (AUC = 0.751, 0.758, respectively, or 0.760, 0.800 when combined with PCT).

Conclusion

Elevated Mb significantly increased the risk of postoperative EAD, suggesting that postoperative Mb may be a novel predictor of EAD after liver transplantation.

The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2100044257, URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn).

High visceral adipose tissue area is independently associated with early allograft dysfunction in liver transplantation recipients: a propensity score analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between adipose tissue distribution and early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in liver transplantation (LT) recipients.

METHODS

A total of 175 patients who received LT from April 2015 to September 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The areas of abdominal adipose tissue and skeletal muscle of all patients were measured based on the preoperative CT images. The appropriate statistical methods including the propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis were performed to identify the association between adipose tissue distribution and EAD.

RESULTS

Of 175 LT recipients, 55 patients (31.4%) finally developed EAD. The multivariate logistic analysis revealed that preoperative serum albumin (odds ratio (OR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.70), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.18-4.79), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.56-6.43) were independent associated with EAD. After PSM analysis, VAT area was still significantly associated with EAD (OR 3.95, 95% CI 1.16-13.51). In survival analysis, no significant difference was identified in one-year graft failure (log-rank: p = 0.487), and conversely result was identified in overall survival (OS) (log-rank: p = 0.012; hazard ratio (HR) 4.10, 95% CI 1.27-13.16).

CONCLUSIONS

LT recipients with high VAT area have higher risk for the occurrence of EAD, and high VAT area might have certain clinical value for predicting the poor OS of patients. For LT candidates with large amount of VAT, the clinicians can take clinical interventions by suggesting physical and nutritional treatments to improve outcomes after LT.

Perioperative management of adult living donor liver transplantation: Part 1 - recipients

Living donor liver transplantation was first developed to mitigate the limited access to deceased donor organs in Asia in the 1990s. This alternative liver transplantation option has become an established and widely practiced transplantation method for adult patients suffering from end-stage liver disease. It has successfully addressed the shortage of deceased donors. The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society of Transplant Anesthesia jointly reviewed published studies on the perioperative management of live donor liver transplant recipients. The review aims to offer transplant anesthesiologists and critical care physicians a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management of adult live liver transplantation recipients. We feature the status, outcomes, surgical procedure, portal venous decompression, anesthetic management, prevention of acute kidney injury, avoidance of blood transfusion, monitoring and therapeutic strategies of hemodynamic derangements, and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for liver transplant recipients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Intraoperative High Fraction of Inspiratory Oxygen is Independently Associated with Worse Outcome After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Study

Background

Ischemia and reperfusion injury is an important factor that determines graft function after liver transplantation, and oxygen plays a crucial role in this process. However, the relationship between the intraoperative high fraction of inspiratory oxygen (FiO₂) and living-donor-liver-transplantation (LDLT) outcome remains unclear.

Patients and Methods

A total of 199 primary adult-to-adult LDLT cases in Kyoto University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2017 were enrolled in this study. The intraoperative FiO₂ was averaged using the total amount of intraoperative oxygen and air and defined as the calculated FiO₂ (cFiO₂). The cutoff value of cFiO₂ was set at 0.5.

Results

Between the cFiO₂ <0.5 (n = 156) and ≥0.5 group (n = 43), preoperative recipients’ background, donor factors, and intraoperative parameters were almost comparable. Postoperatively, the cFiO₂ ≥0.5 group showed a higher early allograft dysfunction (EAD) rate (P = 0.049) and worse overall graft survival (P = 0.036) than the cFiO₂ <0.5 group. Although the cFiO₂ ≥0.5 was not an independent risk factor for EAD in multivariable analysis (OR 2.038, 95%CI 0.992–4.186, P = 0.053), it was an independent risk factor for overall graft survival after LDLT (HR 1.897, 95%CI 1.007–3.432, P = 0.048).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that intraoperative high FiO₂ may be associated with worse graft survival after LDLT. Avoiding higher intraoperative FiO₂ may be beneficial for LDLT recipients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-022-06544-7.

HPi: A Novel Parameter to Predict Graft-related Outcome in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant

BACKGROUND

Portal hyperperfusion is frequently associated with early allograft dysfunction (EAD). It is imperative to identify patients who would require portal inflow modulation. We aimed to identify factors associated with hyperperfusion-related graft injury and develop a predictive index for the same.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained database was queried to identify 135 adult living donor liver transplant recipients between September 2016 and July 2020. According to the calculated sample size, 96 patients were randomly selected for "test cohort". The remaining 39 patients made the "validation cohort." EAD was defined according to the A2ALL study. "Hyperperfusion index (HPi)," defined as posttransplant portal pressure gradient (ΔPpost)/graft-to-recipient splenic volume ratio (GRSVR), was devised on the basis of laws of flow dynamics and regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 40 patients (29.6%) had EAD, six 90-d mortalities (4.4%) were attributable to EAD. In the test cohort, EAD patients (n = 29, 30.2%) had lower GRSVR (1.00 versus 2.22, P < 0.001), higher ΔPpost (14.8 versus 11.9, P = 0.004), and HPi (20.89 versus 8.67, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed GRSVR, ΔPpost, and HPi as significant factors to predict EAD. Receiver operating characteristic determined cutoff of HPi ≥9.97 could predict EAD with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 73% (F-score = 0.712). HPi ≥16.25 predicted 90-d mortality with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 78.9%. Patients with higher HPi had delayed graft-related recovery. Non-EAD patients had a higher 1-y (96% versus 79%) and 2-y (88% versus 79%) survival. The cutoff of HPi was validated well in the validation cohort (F-score = 0.645) (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

While predicted GRSVR may help identify at-risk patients preoperatively, intraoperatively calculated HPi is more accurate in identifying patients who would require portal inflow modulation. Achieving an HPi below target cutoff significantly decreases the risk of EAD even in low-GRSVR patients.

Early Allograft Dysfunction After Live Donor Liver Transplantation: It's Time to Redefine?

BACKGROUND

An ideal definition of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains elusive. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of existing EAD definitions, identify the predictors of early graft loss due to EAD, and formulate a new definition, estimating EAD-related mortality in LDLT recipients.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients undergoing elective LDLT were analyzed. Patients with technical (vascular, biliary) complications and biopsy-proven rejections were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 19 deaths due to EAD of a total of 304 patients. On applying the existing definitions of EAD, we revealed their limitations of being either too broad with low specificity or too restrictive with low sensitivity in patients with LDLT. A new definition of EAD-LDLT (total bilirubin >10 mg/dL, international normalized ratio [INR] > 1.6 and serum urea >100 mg/dL, for five consecutive days after day 7) was derived after doing a multivariate analysis. In receiver operator characteristics analysis, an AUC for EAD-LDLT was 0.86. The calibration and internal cross-validation of the new model confirmed its predictability.

CONCLUSION

The new model of EAD-LDLT, based on total bilirubin >10 mg/dL, INR >1.6 and serum urea >100 mg/dL, for five consecutive days after day 7, has a better predictive value for mortality due to EAD in LDLT recipients.

Uric Acid as a Predictor for Early Allograft Dysfunction after Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Observational Study

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is a postoperative complication that may cause graft failure and mortality after liver transplantation. The objective of this study was to examine whether the preoperative serum uric acid (SUA) level may predict EAD. We performed a prospective observational study, including 61 donor/recipient pairs who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In the univariate and multivariate analysis, SUA ≤4.4 mg/dL was related to a five-fold (odds ratio (OR): 5.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.41–18.83; OR: 5.39, 95% CI: 1.29–22.49, respectively) increased risk for EAD. A lower preoperative SUA was related to a higher incidence of and risk for EAD. Our study provides a new predictor for evaluating EAD and may exert a protective effect against EAD development.

Magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) is a viable alternative to liver biopsy for steatosis quantification in living liver donor transplantation

This study aimed to investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) can be a viable noninvasive alternative to liver biopsy for the quantification of living liver donor steatosis. Hepatic steatosis for 143 donors was graded by MRI-PDFF. Study endpoints included liver volume regeneration in donors, recipient outcomes including length of hospital stay, deaths, primary non-function (PNF), early allograft dysfunction (EAD), and small for size syndrome (SFSS). Correlation between MRI-PDFF determined donor steatosis and endpoints were analyzed. Donors had lower steatosis grade than non-donors. Donor remnant liver regenerated to an average of 82% of pre-donation volume by 101 ± 24 days with no complications. There was no correlation between percent liver regeneration and steatosis severity. Among recipients, 4 underwent redo-transplantation and 6 died, with no association with degree of steatosis. 52 recipients (36%) fulfilled criteria for EAD (driven by INR), with no difference in hepatic steatosis between groups. MRI-PDFF reliably predicted donor outcomes. Living donors with no or mild steatosis based on MRI-PDFF (ie, <20%) and meeting other criteria for donation can expect favorable post-surgical outcomes, including liver regeneration. Recipients had a low rate of death or retransplantation with no association between mild hepatic steatosis and EAD.

Current status of left lobe adult to adult living donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes the history and current state of left lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The transplant community continues to face an organ shortage on a global scale, and the expansion of LDLT is attractive because it allows us to provide life-saving liver transplants to individuals without drawing from, or depending on, the limited deceased donor pool. Donor safety is paramount in LDLT, and for this reason, left lobe LDLT is particularly attractive because the donor is left with a larger remnant.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article reviews the donor and recipient evaluations for left lobe LDLT, discusses small for size syndrome and the importance of portal inflow modification, and reviews recipient outcomes in right lobe versus left lobe LDLT.

SUMMARY

Left lobe LDLT was the first adult-to-adult LDLT ever to be performed in Japan in 1993. Since that time, the use of both right and left lobe LDLT has expanded immensely. Recent work in left lobe LDLT has emphasized the need for inflow modification to reduce portal hyperperfusion and early graft dysfunction following transplant. Accumulating evidence suggests, however, that even though early graft dysfunction following LDLT may prolong hospitalization, it does not predict graft or patient survival.

Multicenter validation of the liver graft assessment following transplantation (L-GrAFT) score for assessment of early allograft dysfunction

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) following liver transplantation (LT) negatively impacts graft and patient outcomes. Previously we reported that the liver graft assessment following transplantation (L-GrAFT7) risk score was superior to binary EAD or the model for early allograft function (MEAF) score for estimating 3-month graft failure-free survival in a single-center derivation cohort. Herein, we sought to externally validate L-GrAFT7, and compare its prognostic performance to EAD and MEAF.

METHODS

Accuracies of L-GrAFT7, EAD, and MEAF were compared in a 3-center US validation cohort (n = 3,201), and a Consortium for Organ Preservation in Europe (COPE) normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) trial cohort (n = 222); characteristics were compared to assess generalizability.

RESULTS

Compared to the derivation cohort, patients in the validation and NMP trial cohort had lower recipient median MELD scores; were less likely to require pretransplant hospitalization, renal replacement therapy or mechanical ventilation; and had superior 1-year overall (90% and 95% vs. 84%) and graft failure-free (88% and 93% vs. 81%) survival, with a lower incidence of 3-month graft failure (7.4% and 4.0% vs. 11.1%; p <0.001 for all comparisons). Despite significant differences in cohort characteristics, L-GrAFT7 maintained an excellent validation AUROC of 0.78, significantly superior to binary EAD (AUROC 0.68, p = 0.001) and MEAF scores (AUROC 0.72, p <0.001). In post hoc analysis of the COPE NMP trial, the highest tertile of L-GrAFT7 was significantly associated with time to liver allograft (hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, p = 0.016), Clavien ≥IIIB (HR 2.60, p = 0.034) and ≥IVa (HR 4.99, p = 0.011) complications; post-LT length of hospitalization (p = 0.002); and renal replacement therapy (odds ratio 3.62, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

We have validated the L-GrAFT7 risk score as a generalizable, highly accurate, individualized risk assessment of 3-month liver allograft failure that is superior to existing scores. L-GrAFT7 may standardize grading of early hepatic allograft function and serve as a clinical endpoint in translational studies (www.lgraft.com).

LAY SUMMARY

Early allograft dysfunction negatively affects outcomes following liver transplantation. In independent multicenter US and European cohorts totaling 3,423 patients undergoing liver transplantation, the liver graft assessment following transplantation (L-GrAFT) risk score is validated as a superior measure of early allograft function that accurately discriminates 3-month graft failure-free survival and post-liver transplantation complications.

Living donor liver transplantation for pediatric patients with metabolic disease vs. deceased donation

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting reports on the outcomes of patients with metabolic liver disease after liver transplantation. We aimed to compare the outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for metabolic disease vs orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) from deceased donation.

METHODS

Clinical data of 89 patients undergoing liver transplantation for the treatment of metabolic disorders were reviewed. Pre- and peri-transplant demographics, survival rate, complications and laboratory test data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

For the 89 patients, only 2 died by the end of the last follow-up. The post-transplant EAD rate and severe complications were higher for OLT than LDLT. No significant difference was found between LDLT and OLT for the incidence of EBV and CMV infections. In terms of laboratory indexes, the recovery time of PLT, AKP and AST levels were significantly longer for OLT than LDLT. Among different types of metabolic disease, no significant difference was found in viral infection, EAD, laboratory indexes, severe complications or duration of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

LDLT shows a lower incidence rate of EAD and complications, while it also shows a 1-year survival rate and incidence of viral infections compared similar to that of OLT. LDLT is the better treatment option of pediatric liver transplantation for metabolic liver disease compared with OLT.

Severity of early allograft dysfunction following donation after circulatory death liver transplantation: a multicentre study

Background

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is associated with decreased graft and patient survival rates. This study aimed to identify the severity of EAD and develop a predictive model for EAD after donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT). Furthermore, the influence of operative time on EAD incidence was also evaluated.

Methods

In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, nomograms were established based on a single-centre training cohort (n=321) and validated in a 3-center validation cohort (n=501).

Results

The incidence rate of EAD was 46.4% (149/321) in the training cohort and 40.5% (203/501) in the validation cohort. Of the 149 EAD patients in the training cohort, 77 patients with either elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were classified as having EAD type A, and the rest of the EAD patients were classified as having EAD type B. Recipients with EAD type B had lower graft and patient survival rates than recipients with EAD type A (P=0.043 and 0.044, respectively). We further developed a nomogram to predict EAD (graft weight, cold ischemia time, donor age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score) and another nomogram to predict EAD type B (graft weight, cold ischemia time, MELD score). The nomograms for the prediction of EAD and EAD type B had good discrimination [concordance index (C-index) =0.712 (0.666-0.758), 0.707 (0.641-0.773)] and calibration [Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) P=0.384, P=0.425] in the validation cohort. An increased operative time (>6 h) was associated with increased EAD and EAD type B incidence in the high-risk group (P=0.005, P=0.020, respectively).

Conclusions

EAD type B was associated with decreased graft and patient survival rates. The novel nomograms effectively predicted the incidence of EAD and EAD type B in DCD LT patients.

von Willebrand factor to protein C ratio-related thrombogenicity with systemic inflammation is predictive of graft dysfunction after liver transplantation: Retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is known to be a prototype of graft failure and ultimately influences long-term graft failure or death. We hypothesized that pretransplant thrombogenicity evaluated by procoagulant and anticoagulant, von Willebrand factor (vWF), factor Ⅷ (FⅧ), protein C (PC) and their imbalance ratio of vWF-to-PC (vWFPCR) and FVIII-to-PC (FⅧPCR), is associated with EAD and 90-day graft failure after living-related liver transplantation (LDLT) and contributes to further exacerbation of graft dysfunction when coexists with systemic inflammation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 1199 prospectively registered LDLT patients, 698 with measurements of each thrombogenicity parameters were analyzed. Risk factors for EAD development were searched and subsequent best cut-offs was calculated according to the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. When comparing the outcome, multivariable regression analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) of the propensity score were performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of EAD was 10.7% (n = 75/698) after LDLT. Of parameters, vWFPCR had highest predictivity potential of EAD with the best cut-off of 8.06. The relationship between vWFPCR≥8.06 showed significant association with EAD development (OR [95%CI], 2.55[1.28-5.09], P = 0.008) and 90-day graft failure (HR [95%CI], 2.24 [1-4.98], P = 0.043) after IPTW-adjustment. Furthermore, risk of EAD increased proportionally with increasing C-reactive protein as a continuous metric of systemic inflammation, and more steeply in those with higher thrombogenicity (i.e., higher vWFPCR). Adding vWFPCR to MELD score improved EAD risk prediction by 21.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant thrombogenicity assessed by imbalance of pro- and anticoagulant, was significantly associated with EAD and 90-day graft failure after LDLT and this association was worsened by systemic inflammation.

A nomogram for prediction of early allograft dysfunction in living donor liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver diseases. However, early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is frequently encountered and associated with graft loss or mortality after transplantation. This study aimed to establish a predictive model of EAD after living donor liver transplantation. A total of 77 liver transplants were recruited to the study. Multivariate analysis was utilized to identify significant risk factors for EAD. A nomogram was constructed according to the contributions of the risk factors. The predictive values were determined by discrimination and calibration methods. A cohort of 30 patients was recruited to validate this predictive model. Four independent risk factors, including donor age, intraoperative blood loss, preoperative alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and reperfusion total bilirubin, were identified and used to build the nomogram. The c-statistics of the primary cohort and the validation group were 0.846 and 0.767, respectively. The calibration curves for the probability of EAD presented an acceptable agreement between the prediction by the nomogram and the actual incidence. In conclusion, the study developed a new nomogram for predicting the risk of EAD following living donor liver transplantation. This model may help clinicians to determine individual risk of EAD following living donor liver transplantation.

Protein Profiles of Pretransplant Grafts Predict Early Allograft Dysfunction After Liver Transplantation From Donation After Circulatory Death

BACKGROUND

Predicting the development of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) following liver transplantation (LT) remains challenging for transplant clinicians. The objectives of this study are to investigate the potential relationship between the protein profiles of pretransplant grafts and the onset of EAD, and then combine with clinical parameters to construct a mathematically predictive model.

METHODS

Clinical data of 121 LT procedures from donation after circulatory death at the authors' center were analyzed. The expression levels of 7 studied proteins were determined by immunohistochemistry. Another independent cohort of 37 subjects was designed for further validation of the predictive model.

RESULTS

With an incidence of 43.0% (52/121), EAD was linked to significantly increased risk of acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy, as well as reduced 6-month patient and liver graft survival. Allograft weight and high intrahepatic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression were identified as independent risk factors of EAD and survival outcomes. Liver grafts with high VEGF expression exhibited delayed functional recovery within the first postoperative week. The combination of VEGF overexpression and EAD yielded the highest frequency of renal dysfunction and the worst survival. Based on allograft weight and intrahepatic VEGF expression, an EAD risk assessment model was developed. The incidence of EAD differed significantly between grafts with risk scores ≥-1.72 and <-1.72. The model functioned well in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant intrahepatic protein profiling contributes to the estimation of early graft performance and recipient outcomes following LT. The predictive model could allow for an accurate prediction of EAD.

Small-for-size graft, small-for-size syndrome and inflow modulation in living donor liver transplantation

The extended application of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has revealed the problem of graft size mismatching called "small-for-size syndrome (SFSS)." The initial trials to resolve this problem involved increasing the procured graft size, from left to right, and even extending to include a right lobe graft. Clinical cases of living right lobe donations have been reported since then, drawing attention to the risks of increasing the liver volume procured from a living donor. However, not only other modes of increasing graft volume (GV) such as auxiliary or dual liver transplantation, but also control of the increased portal pressure caused by a small-for-size graft (SFSG), such as a porto-systemic shunt or splenectomy and optimal outflow reconstruction, have been trialed with some positive results. To establish an effective strategy for transplanting SFSG and preventing SFSS, it is essential to have precise knowledge and tactics to evaluate graft quality and GV, when performing these LDLTs with portal pressure control and good venous outflow. Thus, we reviewed the updated literature on the pathogenesis of and strategies for using SFSG.

Prognostic index consisting of early post-transplant variables <2 weeks in adult living-donor liver transplantation

AIM

Six-month recipient mortality after adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains high. Early and accurate prediction of recipient outcome and continuous monitoring of recipient severity after surgery are both essential for guiding appropriate care. This study was designed to identify early post-transplant parameters associated with 6-month mortality, and thereby to construct a discriminatory prognostic index (PI).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 400 consecutive primary adult-to-adult LDLTs in our center (2006-2017). Perioperative variables were comprehensively analyzed for their accuracy in predicting recipient mortality by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of each factor.

RESULTS

The AUROCs of preoperative predictive factors, for example, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and donor age, were 0.56 and 0.64, respectively, whereas those of post-transplant platelet count (PLT), total bilirubin (T-BIL), and prothrombin time - international normalized ratio (INR) on postoperative day (POD)-7-14 were 0.71/0.84, 0.68/0.82, and 0.71/0.78, respectively. Logistic regression analysis provided a formula: PI_POD-14  = 3.39 + 0.12 × PLT_POD-14  - 0.09 × T-BIL_POD-14  - 1.23 × INR_POD-14 , indicating a high AUROC of 0.87. Recipient 6-month survival with PI_POD-14  < 2.38 (n = 173) was 71.7%, whereas that with PI_POD-14  ≥ 2.38 (n = 222) was 97.7% (P < 0.001). The AUROCs of PI_POD-7 were as high as 0.8 in the subgroups with younger donors (<50 years of age), right lobe grafts, ABO-identical/compatible combinations, or low MELD score (<20), indicating usefulness of PI to identify unexpectedly complicated cases within the first week.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel, post-transplant survival estimator, PI, accurately predicts recipient 6-month mortality within 1-2 weeks after adult LDLT. Daily monitoring of PI could facilitate early interventions including retransplantation in critically ill patients.

Influence of intraoperative oxygen content on early postoperative graft dysfunction in living donor liver transplantation: A STROBE-compliant retrospective observational study

The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of intraoperative oxygen content on the development of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).This retrospective review included 452 adult patients who underwent elective LDLT. Our study population was classified into 2 groups: EAD and non-EAD. Arterial blood gas analysis was routinely performed 3 times during surgery: during the preanhepatic phase (ie, immediately after anesthetic induction); during the anhepatic phase (ie, at the onset of hepatic venous anastomosis); and during the neohepatic phase (ie, 1 hour after graft reperfusion). Arterial oxygen content (milliliters per deciliters) was derived using the following equation: (1.34 × hemoglobin [gram per deciliters] × SaO2 [%] × 0.01) + (0.0031 × PaO2 [mmHg]).The incidence of EAD occurrence was 13.1% (n = 59). Although oxygen contents at the preanhepatic phase were comparable between the 2 groups, the oxygen contents at the anhepatic and neohepatic phases were lower in the EAD group than in the non-EAD group. Patients with postoperative EAD had lower oxygen content immediately before and continuously after graft reperfusion, compared to patients without postoperative EAD. After the preanhepatic phase, oxygen content decreased in the EAD group but increased in the non-EAD group. The oxygen content and prevalence of normal oxygen content gradually increased during surgery in the non-EAD group, but not in the EAD group. Multivariable analysis revealed that oxygen content during the anhepatic phase and higher preoperative CRP levels were factors independently associated with the occurrence of EAD (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.754; 95% confidence interval: 0.681-0.826; P < .001 in the model). Postoperatively, patients with EAD had a longer duration of hospitalization, higher incidences of acute kidney injury and infection, and experienced higher rates of patient mortality, compared to patients without EAD.Lower arterial oxygen concentration may negatively impact the functional recovery of the graft after LDLT, despite preserved hepatic vascular flow. Before graft reperfusion, the levels of oxygen content components, such as hemoglobin content, PaO2, and SaO2, should be regularly assessed and carefully maintained to ensure proper oxygen delivery into transplanted liver grafts.

Risk stratification for early bacteremia after living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated perioperative clinical risk factors for early post-transplant bacteremia in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Additionally, postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and without early post-transplant bacteremia.

METHODS

Clinical data of 610 adult patients who underwent elective LDLT between January 2009 and December 2018 at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital were retrospectively collected. The exclusion criteria included overt signs of infection within 1 month before surgery. A total of 596 adult patients were enrolled in this study. Based on the occurrence of a systemic bacterial infection after surgery, patients were classified into non-infected and infected groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of bacteremia at 1 month after LDLT was 9.7% (57 patients) and Enterococcus faecium (31.6%) was the most commonly cultured bacterium in the blood samples. Univariate analysis showed that preoperative psoas muscle index (PMI), model for end-stage disease score, utility of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), ascites, C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and sodium level, as well as intraoperative post-reperfusion syndrome, mean central venous pressure, requirement for packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma, hourly fluid infusion and urine output, and short-term postoperative early allograft dysfunction (EAD) were associated with the risk of early post-transplant bacteremia. Multivariate analysis revealed that PMI, the CRRT requirement, the NLR, and EAD were independently associated with the risk of early post-transplant bacteremia (area under the curve: 0.707; 95% confidence interval: 0.667-0.745; p < 0.001). The overall survival rate was better in the non-infected patient group. Among patients with bacteremia, anti-bacterial treatment was unable to resolve infection in 34 patients, resulting in an increased risk of patient mortality. Among the factors included in the model, EAD was significantly correlated with non-resolving infection.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a prognostic model to identify patients at high risk for a bloodstream bacterial infection; furthermore, our findings support the notion that skeletal muscle depletion, CRRT requirement, systemic inflammatory response, and delayed liver graft function are associated with a pathogenic vulnerability in cirrhotic patients who undergo LDLT.

Conceptual changes in small-for-size graft and small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation

Early series in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in adults demonstrated a lower safe limit of graft volume standard liver volume ratio 25%–45%. A subsequent worldwide large LDLT series proposed a 0.8 graft recipient weight ratio (GRWR) to define small-for-size graft (SFSG) in adult LDLT. Thereafter, researchers identified innate and inevitable factors including changes in liver volume during imaging studies and graft shrinkage due to perfusion solution. Although the definition of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) advocated in the 2000s was mainly based on prolonged cholestasis and ascites output, the term SFSS was inadequate to describe clinical manifestations possibly caused by multiple factors. Thus, the term “early allograft dysfunction (EAD),” characterized by total bilirubin >10 mg/dL or coagulopathy with international normalized ratio >1.6 on day 7, has become prevalent to describe graft dysfunction including SFSS after LDLT. Although various efforts have been made to overcome EAD in LDLT, graft selection to maintain an expected GRWR >0.8 and full venous drainage, as well as inflow modulation using splenic artery ligation, have become standard in recent LDLT.

Predictive utility of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in early allograft dysfunction in living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to determine the association between the ratio of C-reactive protein to albumin (CRP/ALB) and the risk of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 588 adult patients undergoing LDLT were retrospectively investigated, after 22 were excluded because of signs of overt infection or history of ALB infusion. The study population was classified into high and low CRP/ALB ratio groups according to EAD. All laboratory variables, including CRP and ALB, had been collected on the day before surgery. A percentage value for the CRP/ALB ratio (%) was calculated as CRP/ALB × 100.

RESULTS

After LDLT, 83 patients (14.1%) suffered EAD occurrence. A higher CRP/ALB ratio was independently associated with risk of EAD, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, fresh frozen plasma transfusion, and donor age. Based on a cutoff CRP/ALB ratio (i.e., > 20%), the probability of EAD was significantly (2-fold) higher in the high versus low CRP/ALB group. The predictive utility of CRP/ALB ratio for EAD was greater than those of other inflammatory markers. In addition, patients with a high CRP/ALB ratio had poorer survival than those with a low CRP/ALB ratio during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The easily calculated CRP/ALB ratio may allow estimation of the risk of EAD after LDLT and can provide additional information that may facilitate the estimation of a patient's overall condition.

Evaluation of Early Allograft Function Using the Liver Graft Assessment Following Transplantation Risk Score Model

Importance

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) following a liver transplant (LT) unequivocally portends adverse graft and patient outcomes, but a widely accepted classification or grading system is lacking.

Objective

To develop a model for individualized risk estimation of graft failure after LT and then compare the model's prognostic performance with the existing binary EAD definition (bilirubin level of ≥10 mg/dL on postoperative day 7, international normalized ratio of ≥1.6 on postoperative day 7, or aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase level of >2000 U/L within the first 7 days) and the Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF) score.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective single-center analysis used a transplant database to identify all adult patients who underwent a primary LT and had data on 10 days of post-LT laboratory variables at the Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center of the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA between February 1, 2002, and June 30, 2015. Data collection took place from January 4, 2016, to June 30, 2016. Data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2016, to August 30, 2017.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Three-month graft failure-free survival.

Results

Of 2021 patients who underwent primary LT over the study period, 2008 (99.4%) had available perioperative data and were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of recipients was 56 (49-62) years, and 1294 recipients (64.4%) were men. Overall survival and graft-failure-free survival rates were 83% and 81% at year 1, 74% and 71% at year 3, and 69% and 65% at year 5, with an 11.1% (222 recipients) incidence of 3-month graft failure or death. Multivariate factors associated with 3-month graft failure-free survival included post-LT aspartate aminotransferase level, international normalized ratio, bilirubin level, and platelet count, measures of which were used to calculate the Liver Graft Assessment Following Transplantation (L-GrAFT) risk score. The L-GrAFT model had an excellent C statistic of 0.85, with a significantly superior discrimination of 3-month graft failure-free survival compared with the existing EAD definition (C statistic, 0.68; P < .001) and the MEAF score (C statistic, 0.70; P < .001). Compared with patients with lower L-GrAFT risk, LT recipients in the highest 10th percentile of L-GrAFT scores had higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (median [IQR], 34 [26-40] vs 31 [25-38]; P = .005); greater need for pretransplant hospitalization (56.8% vs 44.8%; P = .003), renal replacement therapy (42.9% vs 30.5%; P < .001), mechanical ventilation (35.8% vs 18.1%; P < .001), and vasopressors (22.9% vs 11.0%; P < .001); longer cold ischemia times (median [IQR], 436 [311-539] vs 401 [302-506] minutes; P = .04); greater intraoperative blood transfusions (median [IQR], 17 [10-26] vs 10 [6-17] units of packed red blood cells; P < .001); and older donors (median [IQR] age, 47 [28-56] vs 41 [25-52] years; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

The L-GrAFT risk score allows a highly accurate, individualized risk estimation of 3-month graft failure following LT that is more accurate than existing EAD and MEAF scores. Multicenter validation may allow for the adoption of the L-GrAFT as a tool for evaluating the need for a retransplant, for establishing standardized grading of early allograft function across transplant centers, and as a highly accurate clinical end point in translational studies aiming to mitigate ischemia or reperfusion injury by modulating donor quality and recipient factors.