HnRNP F and hnRNP H1 regulate mRNA stability of amyloid precursor protein

hnRNP A1, hnRNP A2B1, and hnRNP K are dysregulated in tauopathies, but do not colocalize with tau pathology

Tau interacts with multiple heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs)-a family of RNA binding proteins that regulate multiple known cellular functions, including mRNA splicing, mRNA transport, and translation regulation. We have previously demonstrated particularly significant interactions between phosphorylated tau and three hnRNPs (hnRNP A1, hnRNP A2B1, and hnRNP K). Although multiple hnRNPs have been previously implicated in tauopathies, knowledge of whether these hnRNPs colocalize with tau aggregates or show cellular mislocalization in disease is limited. Here, we performed a neuropathological study examining the colocalization between hnRNP A1, hnRNP A2B1, hnRNP K, and phosphorylated tau in two brain regions (hippocampus and frontal cortex) in six disease groups (Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, Pick's disease, and controls). Contrary to expectations, hnRNP A1, hnRNP A2B1, and hnRNP K did not colocalize with AT8-immunoreactive phosphorylated tau pathology in any of the tauopathies examined. However, we did observe significant cellular mislocalization of hnRNP A1, hnRNP A2B1 and hnRNP K in tauopathies, with unique patterns of mislocalization observed for each hnRNP. These data point to broad dysregulation of hnRNP A1, A2B1 and K across tauopathies with implications for disease processes and RNA regulation.

Chicken hnRNPK suppresses interferon production, thereby enhancing IBDV replication

Heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNPK) is a well-known RNA-binding protein initially identified for its role in inhibiting the growth of various human tumors. Members of the hnRNP family have also been implicated in both interferon production and RNA virus replication. However, the role of chicken hnRNPK (chhnRNPK) in the replication of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV) remains unclear. In this study, we identified chhnRNPK as a protein that interacts with genomic double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). Following IBDV infection, chhnRNPK was recruited to the virus replication complex in the cytoplasm. Furthermore, chhnRNPK expression inhibited dsRNA-induced interferon production, specifically at the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) step. Overexpression of chhnRNPK significantly enhanced virus replication, while knockdown of chhnRNPK increased dsRNA-induced interferon production and subsequently disrupted IBDV replication. Collectively, these findings suggest that chhnRNPK promotes IBDV replication by interacting with genomic dsRNA, highlighting a novel host factor that regulates viral replication.

hnRNPs: roles in neurodevelopment and implication for brain disorders

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) constitute a family of multifunctional RNA-binding proteins able to process nuclear pre-mRNAs into mature mRNAs and regulate gene expression in multiple ways. They comprise at least 20 different members in mammals, named from A (HNRNP A1) to U (HNRNP U). Many of these proteins are components of the spliceosome complex and can modulate alternative splicing in a tissue-specific manner. Notably, while genes encoding hnRNPs exhibit ubiquitous expression, increasing evidence associate these proteins to various neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders, such as intellectual disability, epilepsy, microcephaly, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or dementias, highlighting their crucial role in the central nervous system. This review explores the evolution of the hnRNPs family, highlighting the emergence of numerous new members within this family, and sheds light on their implications for brain development.

The Roles of hnRNP Family in the Brain and Brain-Related Disorders

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) belong to a complex family of RNA-binding proteins that are essential to control alternative splicing, mRNA trafficking, synaptic plasticity, stress granule formation, cell cycle regulation, and axonal transport. Over the past decade, hnRNPs have been associated with different brain disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and schizophrenia. Given their essential role in maintaining cell function and integrity, it is not surprising that dysregulated hnRNP levels lead to neurological implications. This review aims to explore the primary functions of hnRNPs in neurons, oligodendrocytes, microglia, and astrocytes, and their roles in brain disorders. We also discuss proteomics and other technologies and their potential for studying and evaluating hnRNPs in brain disorders, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and possible pharmacological interventions.

HPV and RNA Binding Proteins: What We Know and What Remains to Be Discovered

Papillomavirus gene regulation is largely post-transcriptional due to overlapping open reading frames and the use of alternative polyadenylation and alternative splicing to produce the full suite of viral mRNAs. These processes are controlled by a wide range of cellular RNA binding proteins (RPBs), including constitutive splicing factors and cleavage and polyadenylation machinery, but also factors that regulate these processes, for example, SR and hnRNP proteins. Like cellular RNAs, papillomavirus RNAs have been shown to bind many such proteins. The life cycle of papillomaviruses is intimately linked to differentiation of the epithelial tissues the virus infects. For example, viral late mRNAs and proteins are expressed only in the most differentiated epithelial layers to avoid recognition by the host immune response. Papillomavirus genome replication is linked to the DNA damage response and viral chromatin conformation, processes which also link to RNA processing. Challenges with respect to elucidating how RBPs regulate the viral life cycle include consideration of the orchestrated spatial aspect of viral gene expression in an infected epithelium and the epigenetic nature of the viral episomal genome. This review discusses RBPs that control viral gene expression, and how the connectivity of various nuclear processes might contribute to viral mRNA production.

Untranslated Region Sequences and the Efficacy of mRNA Vaccines against Tuberculosis

mRNA vaccines have been shown to be effective in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. The amount of research on the use of mRNAs as preventive and therapeutic modalities has undergone explosive growth in the last few years. Nonetheless, the issue of the stability of mRNA molecules and their translation efficiency remains incompletely resolved. These characteristics of mRNA directly affect the expression level of a desired protein. Regulatory elements of RNA-5' and 3' untranslated regions (UTRs)-are responsible for translation efficiency. An optimal combination of the regulatory sequences allows mRNA to significantly increase the target protein's expression. We assessed the translation efficiency of mRNA encoding of firefly luciferase with various 5' and 3'UTRs in vitro on cell lines DC2.4 and THP1. We found that mRNAs containing 5'UTR sequences from eukaryotic genes HBB, HSPA1A, Rabb, or H4C2, or from the adenoviral leader sequence TPL, resulted in higher levels of luciferase bioluminescence 4 h after transfection of DC2.4 cells as compared with 5'UTR sequences used in vaccines mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 from Moderna and BioNTech. mRNA containing TPL as the 5'UTR also showed higher efficiency (as compared with the 5'UTR from Moderna) at generating a T-cell response in mice immunized with mRNA vaccines encoding a multiepitope antigen. By contrast, no effects of various 5'UTRs and 3'UTRs were detectable in THP1 cells, suggesting that the observed effects are cell type specific. Further analyses enabled us to identify potential cell type-specific RNA-binding proteins that differ in landing sites within mRNAs with various 5'UTRs and 3'UTRs. Taken together, our data indicate high translation efficiency of TPL as a 5'UTR, according to experiments on DC2.4 cells and C57BL/6 mice.

RNA-Binding Proteins Regulate Post-Transcriptional Responses to TGF-β to Coordinate Function and Mesenchymal Activation of Murine Endothelial Cells

BACKGROUND

Endothelial cells (ECs) are primed to respond to various signaling cues. For example, TGF (transforming growth factor)-β has major effects on EC function and phenotype by driving ECs towards a more mesenchymal state (ie, triggering endothelial to mesenchymal activation), a dynamic process associated with cardiovascular diseases. Although transcriptional regulation triggered by TGF-β in ECs is well characterized, post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms induced by TGF-β remain largely unknown.

METHODS

Using RNA interactome capture, we identified global TGF-β driven changes in RNA-binding proteins in ECs. We investigated specific changes in the RNA-binding patterns of hnRNP H1 (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H1) and Csde1 (cold shock domain containing E1) using RNA immunoprecipitation and overlapped this with RNA-sequencing data after knockdown of either protein for functional insight. Using a modified proximity ligation assay, we visualized the specific interactions between hnRNP H1 and Csde1 and target RNAs in situ both in vitro and in mouse heart sections.

RESULTS

Characterization of TGF-β-regulated RBPs (RNA-binding proteins) revealed hnRNP H1 and Csde1 as key regulators of the cellular response to TGF-β at the post-transcriptional level, with loss of either protein-promoting mesenchymal activation in ECs. We found that TGF-β drives an increase in binding of hnRNP H1 to its target RNAs, offsetting mesenchymal activation, but a decrease in Csde1 RNA-binding, facilitating this process. Both, hnRNP H1 and Csde1, dynamically bind and regulate specific subsets of mRNAs related to mesenchymal activation and endothelial function.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, we show that RBPs play a key role in the endothelial response to TGF-β stimulation at the post-transcriptional level and that the RBPs hnRNP H1 and Csde1 serve to maintain EC function and counteract mesenchymal activation. We propose that TGF-β profoundly modifies RNA-protein interaction entailing feedback and feed-forward control at the post-transcriptional level, to fine-tune mesenchymal activation in ECs.

Research Progress on the Structural and Functional Roles of hnRNPs in Muscle Development

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) are a superfamily of RNA-binding proteins consisting of more than 20 members. These proteins play a crucial role in various biological processes by regulating RNA splicing, transcription, and translation through their binding to RNA. In the context of muscle development and regeneration, hnRNPs are involved in a wide range of regulatory mechanisms, including alternative splicing, transcription regulation, miRNA regulation, and mRNA stability regulation. Recent studies have also suggested a potential association between hnRNPs and muscle-related diseases. In this report, we provide an overview of our current understanding of how hnRNPs regulate RNA metabolism and emphasize the significance of the key members of the hnRNP family in muscle development. Furthermore, we explore the relationship between the hnRNP family and muscle-related diseases.

Drug delivery approaches for HuR-targeted therapy for lung cancer

Lung cancer (LC) is often diagnosed at an advanced stage and conventional treatments for disease management have limitations associated with them. Novel therapeutic targets are thus avidly sought for the effective management of LC. RNA binding proteins (RBPs) have been convincingly established as key players in tumorigenesis, and their dysregulation is linked to multiple cancers, including LC. In this context, we review the role of Human antigen R (HuR), an RBP that is overexpressed in LC, and further associated with various aspects of LC tumor growth and response to therapy. Herein, we describe the role of HuR in LC progression and outline the evidences supporting various pharmacologic and biologic approaches for inhibiting HuR expression and function. These approaches, including use of small molecule inhibitors, siRNAs and shRNAs, have demonstrated favorable results in reducing tumor cell growth, invasion and migration, angiogenesis and metastasis. Hence, HuR has significant potential as a key therapeutic target in LC. Use of siRNA-based approaches, however, have certain limitations that prevent their maximal exploitation as cancer therapies. To address this, in the conclusion of this review, we provide a list of nanomedicine-based HuR targeting approaches currently being employed for siRNA and shRNA delivery, and provide a rationale for the immense potential therapeutic benefits offered by nanocarrier-based HuR targeting and its promise for treating patients with LC.