1
|
Mediavilla JR, Lozy T, Lee A, Kim J, Kan VW, Titova E, Amin A, Zody MC, Corvelo A, Oschwald DM, Baldwin A, Fennessey S, Zuckerman JM, Kirn T, Chen L, Zhao Y, Chow KF, Maniatis T, Perlin DS, Kreiswirth BN. Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Individuals in a Large Healthcare Organization from New Jersey. Viruses 2023; 15:1699. [PMID: 37632041 PMCID: PMC10457875 DOI: 10.3390/v15081699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
New Jersey was among the first states impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with one of the highest overall death rates in the nation. Nevertheless, relatively few reports have been published focusing specifically on New Jersey. Here we report on molecular, clinical, and epidemiologic observations, from the largest healthcare network in the state, in a cohort of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. We conducted molecular surveillance of SARS-CoV-2-positive nasopharyngeal swabs collected in nine hospitals from December 2020 through June 2022, using both whole genome sequencing (WGS) and a real-time RT-PCR screening assay targeting spike protein mutations found in variants of concern (VOCs) within our region. De-identified clinical data were obtained retrospectively, including demographics, COVID-19 vaccination status, ICU admission, ventilator support, mortality, and medical history. Statistical analyses were performed to identify associations between SARS-CoV-2 variants, vaccination status, clinical outcomes, and medical risk factors. A total of 5007 SARS-CoV-2-positive nasopharyngeal swabs were successfully screened and/or sequenced. Variant screening identified three predominant VOCs, including Alpha (n = 714), Delta (n = 1877), and Omicron (n = 1802). Omicron isolates were further sub-typed as BA.1 (n = 899), BA.2 (n = 853), or BA.4/BA.5 (n = 50); the remaining 614 isolates were classified as "Other". Approximately 31.5% (1577/5007) of the samples were associated with vaccine breakthrough infections, which increased in frequency following the emergence of Delta and Omicron. Severe clinical outcomes included ICU admission (336/5007 = 6.7%), ventilator support (236/5007 = 4.7%), and mortality (430/5007 = 8.6%), with increasing age being the most significant contributor to each (p < 0.001). Unvaccinated individuals accounted for 79.7% (268/336) of ICU admissions, 78.3% (185/236) of ventilator cases, and 74.4% (320/430) of deaths. Highly significant (p < 0.001) increases in mortality were observed in individuals with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, cancer, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia, but not with obesity, thyroid disease, or respiratory disease. Significant differences (p < 0.001) in clinical outcomes were also noted between SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Delta, Omicron BA.1, and Omicron BA.2. Vaccination was associated with significantly improved clinical outcomes in our study, despite an increase in breakthrough infections associated with waning immunity, greater antigenic variability, or both. Underlying comorbidities contributed significantly to mortality in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, with increasing risk based on the total number of comorbidities. Real-time RT-PCR-based screening facilitated timely identification of predominant variants using a minimal number of spike protein mutations, with faster turnaround time and reduced cost compared to WGS. Continued evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants will likely require ongoing surveillance for new VOCs, with real-time assessment of clinical impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José R. Mediavilla
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Tara Lozy
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA
| | - Annie Lee
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Justine Kim
- Hackensack Meridian Health Biorepository, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA
| | - Veronica W. Kan
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Elizabeth Titova
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Ashish Amin
- Hackensack Meridian Health Biorepository, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA
| | - Michael C. Zody
- New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013, USA (S.F.); (T.M.)
| | - André Corvelo
- New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013, USA (S.F.); (T.M.)
| | | | - Amy Baldwin
- New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013, USA (S.F.); (T.M.)
| | | | - Jerry M. Zuckerman
- Department of Patient Safety and Quality, Hackensack Meridian Health, Edison, NJ 08837, USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Thomas Kirn
- Public Health and Environmental Laboratories, New Jersey Department of Health, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA
| | - Liang Chen
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Yanan Zhao
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Kar Fai Chow
- Hackensack Meridian Health Biorepository, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA
- Department of Pathology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA
| | - Tom Maniatis
- New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013, USA (S.F.); (T.M.)
| | - David S. Perlin
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Barry N. Kreiswirth
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Camargo-Coronel A, Quiñones-Moya H, Hernández-Zavala MR, Hernández-Vázquez JR, Vázquez-Zaragoza MÁ. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies linked to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review. Reumatismo 2023; 75. [PMID: 37154256 DOI: 10.4081/reumatismo.2023.1548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic represents a global health problem, which has been mitigated by the opportune introduction of vaccination programs. Although we already know the benefit that vaccines provide, these are not exempt from adverse events which can be mild to deadly, such as idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, in which a temporal association has not been defined. It is for this reason that we carried out a systematic review of all reported cases of vaccination against COVID-19 and myositis. To identify previously reported cases of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies associated with vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 we registered this protocol on the website of PROSPERO with identification number CRD42022355551. Of the 63 publications identified in MEDLINE and 117 in Scopus, 21 studies were included, reporting 31 cases of patients with vaccination-associated myositis. Most of these cases were women (61.3%); mean age was 52.3 years (range 19-76 years) and mean time of symptom onset post-vaccination was 6.8 days. More than half of the cases were associated with Comirnaty, 11 cases (35.5%) were classified as dermatomyositis, and 9 (29%) as amyopathic dermatomyositis. In 6 (19.3%) patients another probable trigger was identified. Case reports of inflammatory myopathies associated with vaccination have heterogeneous presentations without any specific characteristics: as a consequence, it is not possible to ensure a temporal association between vaccination and the development of inflammatory myopathies. Large epidemiological studies are required to determine the existence of a causal association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Camargo-Coronel
- Rheumatology Department, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Mexico City.
| | - H Quiñones-Moya
- Rheumatology Department, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Mexico City.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Van Egeren D, Stoddard M, White LF, Hochberg NS, Rogers MS, Zetter B, Joseph-McCarthy D, Chakravarty A. Vaccines Alone Cannot Slow the Evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:853. [PMID: 37112765 PMCID: PMC10143044 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The rapid emergence of immune-evading viral variants of SARS-CoV-2 calls into question the practicality of a vaccine-only public-health strategy for managing the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. It has been suggested that widespread vaccination is necessary to prevent the emergence of future immune-evading mutants. Here, we examined that proposition using stochastic computational models of viral transmission and mutation. Specifically, we looked at the likelihood of emergence of immune escape variants requiring multiple mutations and the impact of vaccination on this process. Our results suggest that the transmission rate of intermediate SARS-CoV-2 mutants will impact the rate at which novel immune-evading variants appear. While vaccination can lower the rate at which new variants appear, other interventions that reduce transmission can also have the same effect. Crucially, relying solely on widespread and repeated vaccination (vaccinating the entire population multiple times a year) is not sufficient to prevent the emergence of novel immune-evading strains, if transmission rates remain high within the population. Thus, vaccines alone are incapable of slowing the pace of evolution of immune evasion, and vaccinal protection against severe and fatal outcomes for COVID-19 patients is therefore not assured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Van Egeren
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA
- New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013, USA
| | | | - Laura F. White
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Natasha S. Hochberg
- Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Michael S. Rogers
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Vascular Biology Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Bruce Zetter
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Vascular Biology Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Havers FP, Pham H, Taylor CA, Whitaker M, Patel K, Anglin O, Kambhampati AK, Milucky J, Zell E, Moline HL, Chai SJ, Kirley PD, Alden NB, Armistead I, Yousey-Hindes K, Meek J, Openo KP, Anderson EJ, Reeg L, Kohrman A, Lynfield R, Como-Sabetti K, Davis EM, Cline C, Muse A, Barney G, Bushey S, Felsen CB, Billing LM, Shiltz E, Sutton M, Abdullah N, Talbot HK, Schaffner W, Hill M, George A, Hall AJ, Bialek SR, Murthy NC, Murthy BP, McMorrow M. COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Adults 18 Years or Older in 13 US States, January 2021 to April 2022. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:1071-1081. [PMID: 36074486 PMCID: PMC9459904 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.4299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Understanding risk factors for hospitalization in vaccinated persons and the association of COVID-19 vaccines with hospitalization rates is critical for public health efforts to control COVID-19. Objective To determine characteristics of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations among vaccinated persons and comparative hospitalization rates in unvaccinated and vaccinated persons. Design, Setting, and Participants From January 1, 2021, to April 30, 2022, patients 18 years or older with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified from more than 250 hospitals in the population-based COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network. State immunization information system data were linked to cases, and the vaccination coverage data of the defined catchment population were used to compare hospitalization rates in unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals. Vaccinated and unvaccinated patient characteristics were compared in a representative sample with detailed medical record review; unweighted case counts and weighted percentages were calculated. Exposures Laboratory-confirmed COVID-19-associated hospitalization, defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result within 14 days before or during hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures COVID-19-associated hospitalization rates among vaccinated vs unvaccinated persons and factors associated with COVID-19-associated hospitalization in vaccinated persons were assessed. Results Using representative data from 192 509 hospitalizations (see Table 1 for demographic information), monthly COVID-19-associated hospitalization rates ranged from 3.5 times to 17.7 times higher in unvaccinated persons than vaccinated persons regardless of booster dose status. From January to April 2022, when the Omicron variant was predominant, hospitalization rates were 10.5 times higher in unvaccinated persons and 2.5 times higher in vaccinated persons with no booster dose, respectively, compared with those who had received a booster dose. Among sampled cases, vaccinated hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were older than those who were unvaccinated (median [IQR] age, 70 [58-80] years vs 58 [46-70] years, respectively; P < .001) and more likely to have 3 or more underlying medical conditions (1926 [77.8%] vs 4124 [51.6%], respectively; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of US adults hospitalized with COVID-19, unvaccinated adults were more likely to be hospitalized compared with vaccinated adults; hospitalization rates were lowest in those who had received a booster dose. Hospitalized vaccinated persons were older and more likely to have 3 or more underlying medical conditions and be long-term care facility residents compared with hospitalized unvaccinated persons. The study results suggest that clinicians and public health practitioners should continue to promote vaccination with all recommended doses for eligible persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona P Havers
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
- Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Huong Pham
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Christopher A Taylor
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michael Whitaker
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kadam Patel
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
- General Dynamics Information Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Onika Anglin
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
- General Dynamics Information Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anita K Kambhampati
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jennifer Milucky
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Elizabeth Zell
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
- Stat-Epi Associates, Inc, Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida
| | - Heidi L Moline
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
- Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Shua J Chai
- Field Services Branch, Division of State and Local Readiness, Center for Preparedness and Response, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland
| | | | - Nisha B Alden
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver
| | - Isaac Armistead
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver
| | | | - James Meek
- Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven
| | - Kyle P Openo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta
| | - Evan J Anderson
- Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Libby Reeg
- Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing
| | | | | | | | | | - Cory Cline
- New Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe
| | | | | | - Sophrena Bushey
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Christina B Felsen
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | | | | | - Melissa Sutton
- Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland
| | | | - H Keipp Talbot
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Mary Hill
- Salt Lake County Health Department, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Andrea George
- Salt Lake County Health Department, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Aron J Hall
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stephanie R Bialek
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
- Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Neil C Murthy
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
- Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Bhavini Patel Murthy
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
- Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Meredith McMorrow
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia
- Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Rockville, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rudi E, Martin Aispuro P, Zurita E, Gonzalez Lopez Ledesma M, Bottero D, Malito J, Gabrielli M, Gaillard E, Stuible M, Durocher Y, Gamarnik A, Wigdorovitz A, Hozbor D. Immunological study of COVID-19 vaccine candidate based on recombinant spike trimer protein from different SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1020159. [PMID: 36248791 PMCID: PMC9560800 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1020159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The emergency of new SARS-CoV-2 variants that feature increased immune escape marks an urgent demand for better vaccines that will provide broader immunogenicity. Here, we evaluated the immunogenic capacity of vaccine candidates based on the recombinant trimeric spike protein (S) of different SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC), including the ancestral Wuhan, Beta and Delta viruses. In particular, we assessed formulations containing either single or combined S protein variants. Our study shows that the formulation containing the single S protein from the ancestral Wuhan virus at a concentration of 2µg (SW2-Vac 2µg) displayed in the mouse model the highest IgG antibody levels against all the three (Wuhan, Beta, and Delta) SARS-CoV-2 S protein variants tested. In addition, this formulation induced significantly higher neutralizing antibody titers against the three viral variants when compared with authorized Gam-COVID-Vac-rAd26/rAd5 (Sputnik V) or ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca) vaccines. SW2-Vac 2µg was also able to induce IFN-gamma and IL-17, memory CD4 populations and follicular T cells. Used as a booster dose for schedules performed with different authorized vaccines, SW2-Vac 2µg vaccine candidate also induced higher levels of total IgG and IgG isotypes against S protein from different SARS-CoV-2 variants in comparison with those observed with homologous 3-dose schedule of Sputnik V or AstraZeneca. Moreover, SW2-Vac 2µg booster induced broadly strong neutralizing antibody levels against the three tested SARS-CoV-2 variants. SW2-Vac 2µg booster also induced CD4+ central memory, CD4+ effector and CD8+ populations. Overall, the results demonstrate that SW2-Vac 2 µg is a promising formulation for the development of a next generation COVID-19 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Rudi
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina
| | - Pablo Martin Aispuro
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina
| | - Eugenia Zurita
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina
| | | | - Daniela Bottero
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina
| | - Juan Malito
- INCUINTA INTA, CONICET, HURLINGHAM, INTA Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Magali Gabrielli
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina
| | - Emilia Gaillard
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina
| | - Matthew Stuible
- Human Health Therapeutics Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Yves Durocher
- Human Health Therapeutics Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Andrés Wigdorovitz
- INCUINTA INTA, CONICET, HURLINGHAM, INTA Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniela Hozbor
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wei Z, He J, Wang C, Bao J, Leng T, Chen F. The importance of booster vaccination in the context of Omicron wave. Front Immunol 2022; 13:977972. [PMID: 36159796 PMCID: PMC9498215 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.977972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Omicron (B.1.1.529) was first detected in a sample collected in Botswana on November 11, 2021, and has rapidly replaced Delta as the dominant global variant given the robust transmissibility. Moreover, it displays a lower virulence than other variants. However, the pathogenicity of Omicron appears to be underestimated in view of the increasing levels of herd immunity through natural infection or vaccination. Additionally, the volume of hospitalizations and deaths increase in proportion to the number of cases due to the high transmissibility of Omicron. Therefore, vaccination remains an important public health priority. Notably, a series of important mutations in the Omicron spike protein, especially in the receptor-binding domain and N-terminal domain, appears to be associated with immune escape capacity, reducing the willingness of people to receive vaccines. Herein, we provide an in-depth discussion to assess the effectiveness of the second and third vaccination against Omicron variant. On the one hand, the two-dose vaccination program adopted by many countries is insufficient to prevent Omicron infection given the mutations correlated with immune escape and the decline in vaccine efficacy over time. On the other hand, booster dose significantly increases the protective efficacy against Omicron infection. Most importantly, heterologous third dose vaccination induces a more robust immune response than homologous booster dose. Therefore, under the special background of this pandemic, there is an urgent need to accelerate the third dose of vaccination, especially providing better booster vaccination strategies, to combat emerging Omicron variant.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gabrielli M. COVID-19 in Older Adults at the Time of the Omicron Variant. J Clin Med 2022; 11:5273. [PMID: 36142920 PMCID: PMC9501094 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Since its outbreak, COVID-19 has had a significant impact on older adults worldwide [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Gabrielli
- Department of Emergency, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Deng J, Ma Y, Liu Q, Du M, Liu M, Liu J. Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Heterologous Booster Doses with Homologous Booster Doses for SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:10752. [PMID: 36078466 PMCID: PMC9517782 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
As vaccine resources were distributed unevenly worldwide, sometimes there might have been shortages or delays in vaccine supply; therefore, considering the use of heterogeneous booster doses for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might be an alternative strategy. Therefore, we aimed to review the data available to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of heterologous booster doses with homologous booster doses for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines. We searched relevant studies up to 27 April 2022. Random-effects inverse variance models were used to evaluate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of COVID-19 outcomes and odds ratio (OR) and its CI of safety events. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale and Cochrane Collaboration's tool were used to assess the quality of the included cohort studies. A total of 23 studies involving 1,726,506 inoculation cases of homologous booster dose and 5,343,580 inoculation cases of heterologous booster dose was included. The VE of heterologous booster for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection (VEheterologous = 96.10%, VEhomologous = 84.00%), symptomatic COVID-19 (VEheterologous = 56.80%, VEhomologous = 17.30%), and COVID-19-related hospital admissions (VEheterologous = 97.40%, VEhomologous = 93.20%) was higher than homologous booster. Compared with homologous booster group, there was a higher risk of fever (OR = 1.930, 95% CI, 1.199-3.107), myalgia (OR = 1.825, 95% CI, 1.079-3.089), and malaise or fatigue (OR = 1.745, 95% CI, 1.047-2.906) within 7 days after boosting, and a higher risk of malaise or fatigue (OR = 4.140, 95% CI, 1.729-9.916) within 28 days after boosting in heterologous booster group. Compared with homologous booster group, geometric mean neutralizing titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibody for different SARS-CoV-2 variants and response rate of antibody and gama interferon were higher in heterologous booster group. Our findings suggested that both homologous and heterologous COVID-19 booster doses had great effectiveness, immunogenicity, and acceptable safety, and a heterologous booster dose was more effective, which would help make appropriate public health decisions and reduce public hesitancy in vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Deng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yirui Ma
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Qiao Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Min Du
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Min Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Jue Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| |
Collapse
|