1
|
Esrafilian A, Chandra SS, Gatti AA, Nissi MJ, Mustonen AM, Saisanen L, Reijonen J, Nieminen P, Julkunen P, Toyras J, Saxby DJ, Lloyd DG, Korhonen RK. An Automated and Robust Tool for Musculoskeletal and Finite Element Modeling of the Knee Joint. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2025; 72:56-69. [PMID: 39236141 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2024.3438272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and assess an automatic and robust knee musculoskeletal finite element (MSK-FE) modeling pipeline. METHODS Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were used to train nnU-Net networks for auto-segmentation of knee bones (femur, tibia, patella, and fibula), cartilages (femur, tibia, and patella), menisci, and major knee ligaments. Two different MRI sequences were used to broaden applicability. Next, we created MSK-FE models of an unseen dataset using two MSK-FE modeling pipelines: template-based and auto-meshing. MSK models had personalized knee geometries with multi-degree-of-freedom elastic foundation contacts. FE models used fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic swelling material models for cartilages and menisci. RESULTS Volumes of knee bones, cartilages, and menisci did not significantly differ (p>0.05) across MRI sequences. MSK models estimated secondary knee kinematics during passive knee flexion tests consistent with in vivo and simulation-based values from the literature. Between the template-based and auto-meshing FE models, estimated cartilage mechanics often differed significantly (p<0.05), though differences were <15% (considering peaks during walking), i.e., <1.5 MPa for maximum principal stress, <1 percentage point for collagen fibril strain, and <3 percentage points for maximum shear strain. CONCLUSION The template-based modeling provided a more rapid and robust tool than the auto-meshing approach, while the estimated knee biomechanics were comparable. Nonetheless, the auto-meshing approach might provide more accurate estimates in subjects with distinct knee irregularities, e.g., cartilage lesions. SIGNIFICANCE The MSK-FE modeling tool provides a rapid, easy-to-use, and robust approach for investigating task- and person-specific mechanical responses of the knee cartilage and menisci, holding significant promise, e.g., in personalized rehabilitation planning.
Collapse
|
2
|
Mononen ME, Liukkonen MK, Turunen MJ. X-ray with finite element analysis is a viable alternative for MRI to predict knee osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. J Orthop Res 2024; 42:1964-1973. [PMID: 38650428 DOI: 10.1002/jor.25861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft tissue contrast compared to clinical X-ray imaging methods, while also providing accurate three-dimensional (3D) geometries, it could be reasoned to be the best imaging modality to create 3D finite element (FE) geometries of the knee joint. However, MRI may not necessarily be superior for making tissue-level FE simulations of internal stress distributions within knee joint, which can be utilized to calculate subject-specific risk for the onset and development of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Specifically, MRI does not provide any information about tissue stiffness, as the imaging is usually performed with the patient lying on their back. In contrast, native X-rays taken while the patient is standing indirectly reveal information of the overall health of the knee that is not seen in MRI. To determine the feasibility of X-ray workflow to generate FE models based on the baseline information (clinical image data and subject characteristics), we compared MRI and X-ray-based simulations of volumetric cartilage degenerations (N = 1213) against 8-year follow-up data. The results suggest that X-ray-based predictions of KOA are at least as good as MRI-based predictions for subjects with no previous knee injuries. This finding may have important implications for preventive care, as X-ray imaging is much more accessible than MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mika E Mononen
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mimmi K Liukkonen
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Savo, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mikael J Turunen
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Savo, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adouni M, Aydelik H, Faisal TR, Hajji R. The effect of body weight on the knee joint biomechanics based on subject-specific finite element-musculoskeletal approach. Sci Rep 2024; 14:13777. [PMID: 38877075 PMCID: PMC11178890 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63745-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) and obesity are major public health concerns that are closely intertwined. This intimate relationship was documented by considering obesity as the most significant preventable risk factor associated with knee OA. To date, however, the effects of obesity on the knee joint's passive-active structure and cartilage loading have been inconclusive. Hence, this study investigates the intricate relationship between obesity and knee OA, centering on the biomechanical changes in knee joint active and passive reactions during the stance phase of gait. Using a subject-specific musculoskeletal and finite element approach, muscle forces, ligament stresses, and articular cartilage contact stresses were analyzed among 60 individuals with different body mass indices (BMI) classified under healthy weight, overweight, and obese categories. Our predicted results showed that obesity significantly influenced knee joint mechanical reaction, increasing muscle activations, ligament loading, and articular cartilage contact stresses, particularly during key instances of the gait cycle-first and second peak loading instances. The study underscores the critical role of excessive body weight in exacerbating knee joint stress distribution and cartilage damage. Hence, the insights gained provide a valuable biomechanical perspective on the interaction between body weight and knee joint health, offering a clinical utility in assessing the risks associated with obesity and knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malek Adouni
- Biomedical and Instrumentation Engineering, Abdullah Al Salem University, Khalidiya, Kuwait.
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Northwestern University, 345 East Superior Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Harun Aydelik
- Mathematics, College of Integrative Studies, Abdullah Al Salem University, Khalidiya, Kuwait
| | - Tanvir R Faisal
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, 70508, USA
| | - Raouf Hajji
- Internal Medicine Department, Medicine Faculty of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yan M, Liang T, Zhao H, Bi Y, Wang T, Yu T, Zhang Y. Model Properties and Clinical Application in the Finite Element Analysis of Knee Joint: A Review. Orthop Surg 2024; 16:289-302. [PMID: 38174410 PMCID: PMC10834231 DOI: 10.1111/os.13980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The knee is the most complex joint in the human body, including bony structures like the femur, tibia, fibula, and patella, and soft tissues like menisci, ligaments, muscles, and tendons. Complex anatomical structures of the knee joint make it difficult to conduct precise biomechanical research and explore the mechanism of movement and injury. The finite element model (FEM), as an important engineering analysis technique, has been widely used in many fields of bioengineering research. The FEM has advantages in the biomechanical analysis of objects with complex structures. Researchers can use this technology to construct a human knee joint model and perform biomechanical analysis on it. At the same time, finite element analysis can effectively evaluate variables such as stress, strain, displacement, and rotation, helping to predict injury mechanisms and optimize surgical techniques, which make up for the shortcomings of traditional biomechanics experimental research. However, few papers introduce what material properties should be selected for each anatomic structure of knee FEM to meet different research purposes. Based on previous finite element studies of the knee joint, this paper summarizes various modeling strategies and applications, serving as a reference for constructing knee joint models and research design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyue Yan
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Institute of Sports Medicine and Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Ting Liang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Institute of Sports Medicine and Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Haibo Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Institute of Sports Medicine and Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yanchi Bi
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Institute of Sports Medicine and Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Tianrui Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Tengbo Yu
- Institute of Sports Medicine and Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, China
| | - Yingze Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Esrafilian A, Halonen KS, Dzialo CM, Mannisi M, Mononen ME, Tanska P, Woodburn J, Korhonen RK, Andersen MS. Effects of gait modifications on tissue-level knee mechanics in individuals with medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis: A proof-of-concept study towards personalized interventions. J Orthop Res 2024; 42:326-338. [PMID: 37644668 PMCID: PMC10952410 DOI: 10.1002/jor.25686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Gait modification is a common nonsurgical approach to alter the mediolateral distribution of knee contact forces, intending to decelerate or postpone the progression of mechanically induced knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Nevertheless, the success rate of these approaches is controversial, with no studies conducted to assess alterations in tissue-level knee mechanics governing cartilage degradation response in KOA patients undertaking gait modifications. Thus, here we investigated the effect of different conventional gait conditions and modifications on tissue-level knee mechanics previously suggested as indicators of collagen network damage, cell death, and loss of proteoglycans in knee cartilage. Five participants with medial KOA were recruited and musculoskeletal finite element analyses were conducted to estimate subject-specific tissue mechanics of knee cartilages during two gait conditions (i.e., barefoot and shod) and six gait modifications (i.e., 0°, 5°, and 10° lateral wedge insoles, toe-in, toe-out, and wide stance). Based on our results, the optimal gait modification varied across the participants. Overall, toe-in, toe-out, and wide stance showed the greatest reduction in tissue mechanics within medial tibial and femoral cartilages. Gait modifications could effectually alter maximum principal stress (~20 ± 7%) and shear strain (~9 ± 4%) within the medial tibial cartilage. Nevertheless, lateral wedge insoles did not reduce joint- and tissue-level mechanics considerably. Significance: This proof-of-concept study emphasizes the importance of the personalized design of gait modifications to account for biomechanical risk factors associated with cartilage degradation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Esrafilian
- Department of Technical PhysicsUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
| | - Kimmo S. Halonen
- Central hospital of Päijät‐HämeLahtiFinland
- Department of Materials and ProductionAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
| | | | | | - Mika E. Mononen
- Department of Technical PhysicsUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
| | - Petri Tanska
- Department of Technical PhysicsUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
| | - Jim Woodburn
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering, Menzies Health Institute QueenslandGriffith UniversityGold CoastQLDAustralia
| | - Rami K. Korhonen
- Department of Technical PhysicsUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
| | - Michael S. Andersen
- Department of Materials and ProductionAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
- Center for Mathematical Modeling of Knee Osteoarthritis (MathKOA), Department of Materials and ProductionAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xue A, Mao Z, Zhu X, Yang Q, Wang P, Mao Z, Du M, Ma X, Jiang D, Fan Y, Zhao F. Biomechanical effects of the medial meniscus horizontal tear and the resection strategy on the rabbit knee joint under resting state: finite element analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1164922. [PMID: 37425368 PMCID: PMC10324406 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1164922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The biomechanical changes following meniscal tears and surgery could lead to or accelerate the occurrence of osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of horizontal meniscal tears and different resection strategies on a rabbit knee joint by finite element analysis and to provide reference for animal experiments and clinical research. Magnetic resonance images of a male rabbit knee joint were used to establish a finite element model with intact menisci under resting state. A medial meniscal horizontal tear was set involving 2/3 width of a meniscus. Seven models were finally established, including intact medial meniscus (IMM), horizontal tear of the medial meniscus (HTMM), superior leaf partial meniscectomy (SLPM), inferior leaf partial meniscectomy (ILPM), double-leaf partial meniscectomy (DLPM), subtotal meniscectomy (STM), and total meniscectomy (TTM). The axial load transmitted from femoral cartilage to menisci and tibial cartilage, the maximum von Mises stress and the maximum contact pressure on the menisci and cartilages, the contact area between cartilage to menisci and cartilage to cartilage, and absolute value of the meniscal displacement were analyzed and evaluated. The results showed that the HTMM had little effect on the medial tibial cartilage. After the HTMM, the axial load, maximum von Mises stress and maximum contact pressure on the medial tibial cartilage increased 1.6%, 1.2%, and 1.4%, compared with the IMM. Among different meniscectomy strategies, the axial load and the maximum von Mises stress on the medial menisci varied greatly. After the HTMM, SLPM, ILPM, DLPM, and STM, the axial load on medial menisci decreased 11.4%, 42.2%, 35.4% 48.7%, and 97.0%, respectively; the maximum von Mises stress on medial menisci increased 53.9%, 62.6%, 156.5%, and 65.5%, respectively, and the STM decreased 57.8%, compared to IMM. The radial displacement of the middle body of the medial meniscal was larger than any other part in all the models. The HTMM led to few biomechanical changes in the rabbit knee joint. The SLPM showed minimal effect on joint stress among all resection strategies. It is recommended to preserve the posterior root and the remaining peripheral edge of the meniscus during surgery for an HTMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anqi Xue
- Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Medical Device Testing, Beijing, China
| | - Zuming Mao
- Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhu
- Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Yang
- Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Peichen Wang
- Beijing Institute of Medical Device Testing, Beijing, China
| | - Zimu Mao
- Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Beijing, China
| | - Mingze Du
- Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Ma
- Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Jiang
- Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Beijing, China
| | - Yubo Fan
- Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Zhao
- Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lloyd DG, Saxby DJ, Pizzolato C, Worsey M, Diamond LE, Palipana D, Bourne M, de Sousa AC, Mannan MMN, Nasseri A, Perevoshchikova N, Maharaj J, Crossley C, Quinn A, Mulholland K, Collings T, Xia Z, Cornish B, Devaprakash D, Lenton G, Barrett RS. Maintaining soldier musculoskeletal health using personalised digital humans, wearables and/or computer vision. J Sci Med Sport 2023:S1440-2440(23)00070-1. [PMID: 37149408 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The physical demands of military service place soldiers at risk of musculoskeletal injuries and are major concerns for military capability. This paper outlines the development new training technologies to prevent and manage these injuries. DESIGN Narrative review. METHODS Technologies suitable for integration into next-generation training devices were examined. We considered the capability of technologies to target tissue level mechanics, provide appropriate real-time feedback, and their useability in-the-field. RESULTS Musculoskeletal tissues' health depends on their functional mechanical environment experienced in military activities, training and rehabilitation. These environments result from the interactions between tissue motion, loading, biology, and morphology. Maintaining health of and/or repairing joint tissues requires targeting the "ideal" in vivo tissue mechanics (i.e., loading and strain), which may be enabled by real-time biofeedback. Recent research has shown that these biofeedback technologies are possible by integrating a patient's personalised digital twin and wireless wearable devices. Personalised digital twins are personalised neuromusculoskeletal rigid body and finite element models that work in real-time by code optimisation and artificial intelligence. Model personalisation is crucial in obtaining physically and physiologically valid predictions. CONCLUSIONS Recent work has shown that laboratory-quality biomechanical measurements and modelling can be performed outside the laboratory with a small number of wearable sensors or computer vision methods. The next stage is to combine these technologies into well-designed easy to use products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Lloyd
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia.
| | - David J Saxby
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Claudio Pizzolato
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Matthew Worsey
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia
| | - Laura E Diamond
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Dinesh Palipana
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Matthew Bourne
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Ana Cardoso de Sousa
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia
| | - Malik Muhammad Naeem Mannan
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia
| | - Azadeh Nasseri
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia
| | - Nataliya Perevoshchikova
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia
| | - Jayishni Maharaj
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Claire Crossley
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Alastair Quinn
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Kyle Mulholland
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia
| | - Tyler Collings
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Zhengliang Xia
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia
| | - Bradley Cornish
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Daniel Devaprakash
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; VALD Performance, Australia
| | | | - Rodney S Barrett
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|