'We were just kind of handed it and then it was smoke bombed by everyone': How do external stakeholders contribute to parent rejection and the abandonment of AAC systems?

Process evaluation of a complex intervention in augmentative and alternative communication care in Germany: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

In Germany, clear care pathways for people without natural speech who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are currently lacking. Therefore, AAC is often not sustainably implemented in everyday life. For this reason, a complex intervention was developed that supplements existing AAC consultation with additional AAC training, AAC therapy, and case management. This article presents the results of the process evaluation of the complex intervention. It examines (1) how caregivers and AAC consultants rate the intervention (2), which contextual factors influence its implementation, and (3) the acceptance, use competence, and use of the new AAC system.

METHODS

The process evaluation used a mixed methods design. Quantitative data were collected with a longitudinal survey of caregivers of AAC users in the intervention and comparison groups at three time points (T0: after AAC consultation; T1: 4 weeks after AAC system receipt; T2: 4 months after AAC system receipt). Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with caregivers of AAC users and with AAC consultants. The quantitative data were analysed descriptively and with nonparametric mean value comparisons. The qualitative results were analysed using structured qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The evaluation and presentation of results were based on the Medical Research Council process evaluation guidance by Moore et al. The intervention elements were rated positively. AAC training and therapy enabled the participants to use the AAC system effectively in different contexts. Case management provided support, particularly in the event of problems in the care process. However, the results also show the heterogeneity of the intervention, as it depended on various contextual factors. Overall, acceptance, use competence, and use of the AAC system were rated higher in the intervention group than in the comparison group.

CONCLUSIONS

The process evaluation illustrates various contextual factors that can influence the implementation of the AAC intervention. The results highlight the potential of the intervention to improve AAC care and establish a sustainable use of AAC systems in everyday life. In addition, the process evaluation provides indications of how AAC interventions can be adapted for successful implementation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Grant number 01NVF17019.

Seeing Into the Future: Adults' Accuracy Predicting the Vocabulary of Early Symbolic Communicators Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication

PURPOSE

Vocabulary access is important for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), especially for children in the early stages of language learning. This study sought to understand how accurate speech-language pathologists (SLPs), teachers, and parents are in predicting the vocabulary needed by early symbolic communicators who use AAC in three contexts.

METHOD

Ten groups, each with a child who used AAC as their primary mode of communication and who was classified as an early symbolic communicator and their parent, teacher, and SLP, participated. The parents, teachers, and SLPs predicted a vocabulary list of words children who use AAC needed to participate in a dinner, a math lesson, and a speech session using the blank page method and categorical inventories technique. Children were then recorded in 15-min videos participating in the three contexts. Words were recorded and compared to the words predicted.

RESULTS

There was large variability in the accuracy of percentage of words the children used that were predicted by the adults out of all the words the children used. The adults were significantly more accurate predicting the vocabulary for the math lesson than the dinner.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents, teachers, and SLPs predicted much of the vocabulary of early symbolic communicators who use AAC. Implications for early vocabulary selection and alternatives to predicting vocabulary are discussed.

Developing a Profile of Canadian Children With Cerebral Palsy Who Require Augmentative and Alternative Communication

PURPOSE

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most prevalent motor disability affecting children. Many children with CP have significant speech difficulties and require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to participate in communication. Despite demonstrable benefits, the use of AAC systems among children with CP remains constrained, although research in Canada is lacking.

METHOD

Data were collected as part of an exploratory survey of Canadian caregivers and clinicians (N = 60) who shared their perspectives on children's need for, access to, and use of AAC systems. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

Caregivers and clinicians reported high rates of need for AAC systems (> 75%) among children with CP. Both groups reported that access was roughly equivalent to need, although caregiver reports were lower. Despite high rates of need and access, only 38% of children used AAC systems. Children who used AAC primarily used high-tech systems, mostly to make choices, rather than engaging in meaningful reciprocal interactions and conversations.

CONCLUSIONS

Canadian children with CP who required AAC systems generally received them. However, AAC systems were not used to their full potential, suggesting limited participation in social and learning situations. Like reports on other pediatric populations, barriers to obtaining AAC systems related to service, family, and child-specific factors. Although our sample captured the complexity present in the CP population, sample sizes were small and unlikely to be representative of the population of Canada, indicating the need for further research on a national scale.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28229720.

Voices from the field: exploring service providers' insights into service delivery and AAC use in Canada

Use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) often relies on the involvement of AAC service providers; however little is known about how AAC services are delivered across Canada. This study aimed to explore AAC service provision and factors influencing use of AAC from the perspectives of service providers across Canada who are involved in providing and/or supporting use of AAC systems. The 22 participants from nine (of the 10) provinces participated in online focus groups. Participants were speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, communicative disorders assistants, and a teacher. Transcripts of the audio recordings were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Four themes were generated that reflect service-related factors contributing to the use of AAC in Canada: Support of Organizational Structures, Concordant Relationships and Goals, Making the Right Decisions, and Influence of Knowledge and Attitudes. These themes highlight how government systems, key stakeholders, assessment practices, and knowledge of AAC influence service provision and use of AAC. Voices from across Canada highlighted shared experiences of services providers as well as revealed variability in service delivery processes. The findings bring to attention a need for further research and development of service provision guidelines to support consistency, quality in practice, and equity in AAC services.

The confidence and competence of speech language pathologists in augmentative and alternative communication: a scoping review

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is a core component of speech pathology practice. However, international literature has highlighted that speech language pathologists (SLPs) may not feel confident or competent in this area. Confidence and competence are critical factors in therapy as they can impact the quality-of-service provision. The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate the confidence/competence of SLPs in AAC. A systematic scoping search was conducted using four databases to identify relevant literature. The first two authors reviewed 30% of abstracts and the remaining 70% were reviewed by the first author. Full-text screening applied the same review approach. Data was then extracted and organized according to the research questions. Thirteen studies were included in the review. All thirteen used self-assessment to measure confidence or competence with one study also using an objective evaluation. Overall, confidence and competence levels varied based on the specific clinical task and etiology of the client in addition to being influenced by prior training, clinician age, workplace and AAC caseload. While current research provides a snapshot of the SLP workforce, it is limited in that the research predominantly uses self-assessment measures, is cross-sectional and is quantitative in nature. Further research into the confidence and competence of SLPs in AAC is required, specifically how confidence and competence can be defined and developed.

In dialogue with the body: a phenomenological exploration of the interrelationship between people who use AAC and their AAC devices

This paper explores the intricate relationship between people who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) and their AAC devices. Drawing upon insights from phenomenology, I conducted a modified systematic review to explore the enduring phenomenon of low AAC device adoption and as a means to unravel the moments of embodiment and disembodiment experienced by people who use AAC with their devices. The discussion begins with an introduction to phenomenology as a philosophical inquiry and the guiding principles I employed to explore the phenomenon, namely, parte extra parte and object embodiment. Subsequently, I analyze the hegemony of a device-centric approach within the AAC landscape and delve into the first-person experiences of people who use AAC in living with their devices. Lastly, I discuss the embodiment and disembodiment of people who use AAC with their devices, conceptualize the interrelationship between them, and provide future directions for a more holistic and participatory AAC development and investigation that centers on the lived experiences of people who use AAC.

Designing Cultural Adaptations of Caregiver-Implemented Interventions for Latinx Caregivers of Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Key Considerations

PURPOSE

Caregivers play a critical role in their children's development and serve as their primary communication partners. Family interactions provide the most naturally occurring opportunities for children with complex communication needs to learn language in the context of family routines. A growing body of research suggests that caregivers can effectively support their children's use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems when provided with appropriate training and coaching through caregiver-implemented interventions (CIIs). However, the efficacy of these interventions remains untested among culturally and linguistically diverse caregivers. Given the increasing diversity in the United States, there is a pressing need to develop CIIs that align with the cultural and linguistic preferences of diverse families.

METHOD

Using the Ecological Validity Framework and the Checklist for Cultural Adaptations, this tutorial explores considerations for culturally adapting caregiver-implemented AAC interventions for Latinx caregivers of children with AAC needs. The aim is to ensure that interventions are relevant, meaningful, and respectful of cultural and linguistic practices. Through carefully crafted cultural adaptations, interventions can achieve greater acceptance by caregivers.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This tutorial suggests a series of cultural adaptations to ensure accessibility, sustainability, and success of caregiver-implemented AAC interventions for Latinx caregivers of children with AAC needs. By incorporating cultural and linguistic considerations into the intervention design, we can enhance its acceptability among Latinx caregivers. This, in turn, can lead to improved outcomes in AAC implementation within the home environment.

Canadian manufacturer and technician perspectives on the design and use of augmentative and alternative communication technology

PURPOSE

Device manufacturers and technicians (MaTs) of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems play key roles in the design and successful uptake of communication devices. This study aims to investigate MaT perspectives on AAC device design and effective use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To investigate their perspectives, a focus group of MaTs within Canada was conducted. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze data.

FINDINGS

Three major themes resulted from analysis, which reflect MaT's views: AAC hardware and software flexibility, AAC knowledge and implementation, and social good versus financial resources.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insights into the complexities faced by MaTs in balancing technical support of system end-users and the financial resources necessary for that support. These insights indicate a need for increased financial resources and the expansion of individuals who qualify for AAC system candidacy. MaTs suggest that an increase in resources and candidacy could lead to more successful AAC implementation and a greater understanding of AAC for all stakeholders.

Comparing and contrasting barriers in augmentative alternative communication use in nonspeaking autism and complex communication needs: multi-stakeholder perspectives

Augmentative alternative communication (AAC) devices or systems are often prescribed to minimally verbal or nonspeaking autistic individuals and other individuals with complex communication needs to facilitate communication or as an alternative to spoken language. AAC use can result in communication gains and improved quality of life for minimally verbal or nonspeaking individuals. Despite this, AAC abandonment is high, limiting societal participation of the individual on the autism spectrum with complex communication needs. Our study is a novel exploration of the barriers of AAC use from a multi-stakeholder perspective, and a qualitative analysis of similarities and differences between stakeholders. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 30 parent-carers, educators and clinicians currently supporting AAC users in Western Australia and analysed the data using reflexive thematic analysis. Barriers from each stakeholder group were coded, resulting in 17 subthemes forming five main themes common to all stakeholders: Stakeholder Knowledge, Stakeholder Attitudes and Stigma, Resources, AAC User Engagement, and Device Fit. Contrasting perspectives included actual and perceived stigma associated with AAC use (parent-carers vs clinicians); different struggles with resources and knowledge (parent-carers vs clinicians and educators); and a lack of clinician communication in the processes that determined AAC-fit for school environments (educators only). Findings are discussed in the context of improving inter-stakeholder collaboration and capacity building in Australian health service and practice to better support minimally verbal or nonspeaking autistic individuals and individuals with complex communication needs. Suggestions are also offered for communication partner training.

A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Caregivers' Experiences With Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Their Collaboration With School Professionals

PURPOSE

Parent engagement and involvement is essential for the successful implementation of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems in the home. The purpose of the current study is to gain a deeper understanding of caregivers' experiences with AAC systems and their collaboration with school professionals during the implementation of AAC, which may have led to subsequent abandonment.

METHOD

This review intentionally included qualitative studies that employed semistructured interviews, focus groups, and ethnographic investigations that documented the experiences and perceptions of families implementing AAC at home. Electronic database search, ancestral search, and forward search procedures resulted in a total of 27 peer-reviewed studies portraying the voices of 319 caregivers.

RESULTS

An inductive analysis was conducted to record recurring themes into codes. The codes were thematically synthesized into three main themes: (a) the family unit, (b) the service providers, and (c) the AAC system.

CONCLUSIONS

The results emphasized the need for participatory practices of family involvement in co-constructing a collaborative AAC service provision. Future research directions should implement this practice and explore the outcomes of this process to validate its efficacy.

Augmentative and alternative communication with children with severe/profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: speech language pathologists' clinical practices and reasoning

PURPOSE

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is recommended to be included in communication interventions directed at children/youth with severe/profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (S/PIMD). Even so, the evidence base for AAC practices with children with S/PIMD is limited. Also, little is known about how frequently AAC is implemented with this target group, which AAC tools and methods are applied, and the related clinical reasoning of speech-language pathologists (SLPs). This study aimed to explore SLPs' beliefs, clinical reasoning and practices in relation to AAC implementation with children/youth with S/PIMD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this sequential, mixed-methods study, 90 SLPs working with children with disabilities within habilitation services in Sweden participated in an online survey. The survey answers were statistically analysed. Subsequently, focus group data were collected from seven SLPs and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Despite AAC being highly prioritized, SLPs found it challenging and complex to implement with this target group. A wide variety of AAC methods and tools were considered and implemented. Clinical decision-making was a balancing act between competing considerations and was mainly guided by the SLPs' individual, clinical experiences. The resources, engagement and wishes of the social network surrounding the child were considered crucial for clinical decision-making on AAC. Implications for research and practice are discussed.Implications for rehabilitationSpeech-language pathologists (SLPs) seemingly find a wide variety of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC), ranging from unaided methods to assistive technology of various complexity, to be potentially suitable for children/youth with severe/profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (S/PIMD).The motivation and preferences of the social network surrounding the child with S/PIMD seem to influence SLPs' clinical decision-making on AAC to a high degree. Sometimes this may be considered an even more important factor than the abilities of the child.SLPs' clinical decision-making on AAC for children/youth is guided by their individual, clinical experience to a high degree.An increase in family oriented AAC intervention research targeting individuals with S/PIMD could potentially strengthen the association between research and the current, experience-based clinical practice.

Examining the Family-Centeredness of Speech-Language Pathologists Working With Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication

PURPOSE

Family-professional partnerships are important for youth learning to use aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). This study examined the family-oriented beliefs and practices of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) working with preschool and school-aged children learning to use aided AAC (aged 3-21 years), specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHOD

Participants were 25 SLPs who participated in an individual semistructured interview. Qualitative analysis was used to identify and describe groups of SLPs based on commonalities and differences in their beliefs and practices working with families. The characteristics of SLPs in each group was also explored descriptively (e.g., race/ethnicity, work setting, caseload).

RESULTS

SLPs clustered into three groups based on their beliefs and practices: (a) professionally centered, (b) family-allied, and (c) family-focused. SLPs varied across these groups in how they planned services, offered training/coaching, communicated, shared resources, offered emotional support, and adapted to and with different families.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate the need to support greater family-centeredness in AAC services by building on the strengths of SLPs in the field. Promoting strong family-professional partnerships could in turn improve outcomes for students who use AAC.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25044125.

"You Just Want to Be Able to Communicate With Your Child": Parents' Perspectives on Communication and AAC Use for Beginning Communicators on the Autism Spectrum

PURPOSE

For young children on the autism spectrum who are beginning communicators, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) can support language development and participation in meaningful interactions. AAC is more likely to be effective when services align with the needs and priorities of the child's family. To better understand family perspectives, this study investigated the communication and AAC experiences of parents of young beginning communicators on the autism spectrum.

METHOD

The study used a phenomenological qualitative design. Eight caregivers of seven children on the autism spectrum participated in semistructured interviews, and thematic analysis was used to identify themes within the data.

RESULTS

Five main themes and 15 subthemes emerged from the data. Parents situated communication and AAC experiences within the context of complex, busy lives. They discussed the value of communication and benefits of AAC, but described numerous challenges related to obtaining, learning, and implementing AAC that evolved over time as needs and skills changed. Parents discussed their children's individuality and the need for AAC systems and services to fit the unique needs of their child and their family. They also emphasized ways in which communication outcomes were affected by factors external to the child and the family, including factors related to professional services and the U.S. health care and educational systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The results affirm the need to consider the family and the broader social system when providing AAC services to young children on the autism spectrum. Provision of family-centered services is critical to successful AAC.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24881562.

Developing Augmentative and Alternative Communication Competence in Preservice Speech-Language Pathologists: A Collaborative Model for Clinical Educators

PURPOSE

Practicing speech-language pathologists (SLPs) reveal a perceived lack of preparedness to deliver augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) services. This is concerning because it is indicative of inadequate graduate training in AAC. The purpose of this clinical focus article was to present a collaborative model of clinical education for AAC preservice training. This clinical focus article will provide recommendations to support practicing SLPs in the provision of effective clinical instruction for preservice clinicians working with individuals with complex communication needs who require AAC.

METHOD

There is an urgent need for improved training for clinical educators providing instruction in AAC. In this clinical focus article, a literature review of the existing evidence regarding best practices in clinical education and AAC training for SLPs was completed to explore current theoretical and practical approaches. The evidence was utilized to create a collaborative model of recommended clinical education in AAC.

RESULTS

There is limited guidance for clinical educators when it comes to training preservice clinicians. This clinical focus article provides recommendations for AAC training of preservice SLPs by clinical educators in the field of speech-language pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

The collaborative model proposed in this clinical focus article delivers a roadmap to guide practicing SLPs in the development of AAC clinical competence of preservice clinicians. Future research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the model.

Exploring Classroom Factors and Augmentative and Alternative Communication Use in Qualitative Interviews

PURPOSE

This qualitative study explores classroom contextual factors influencing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) use in early childhood classrooms.

METHOD

Semistructured interviews were conducted with six special education teachers, 13 speech-language pathologists (SLPs), and one SLP assistant. Interviews were analyzed inductively in a systematic, multistep coding process using the constant comparative method with member checking.

RESULTS

Seven themes were identified that affected AAC use in the classroom. Each theme was organized into three categories: individual-, classroom-, or school-level factors. Three themes were categorized as individual-level factors: Students' AAC systems are unavailable, professionals face challenges obtaining AAC knowledge and skills, and students' disruptive behaviors reduce access to AAC. One theme was a classroom-level factor: Classroom demands prevent AAC use. Finally, three themes were considered school-level factors: The culture of AAC influences AAC acceptance, team collaboration is essential for successful implementation, and teams need administrative support to deliver AAC interventions effectively. Conclusions: Teachers and SLPs felt that collaborative teams with AAC expertise, a school culture that endorsed AAC, and solid administrative support accelerated AAC adoption by normalizing AAC use in the classroom. Due to classroom demands, they struggled to use strategies such as aided AAC modeling and responsiveness during group instruction. Finally, participants emphasized that while it was necessary to customize AAC systems for each student, this individualization makes it harder for staff to learn each system and integrate them into classroom activities.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23681718.

Parents' perception on the use of augmentative and alternative communication by children with complex communication needs in Malaysia

PURPOSE

Children with developmental disabilities who have complex communication needs (CCN) frequently need to use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to communicate effectively and efficiently. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) often work closely with parents and other professionals when deciding on the best AAC system to introduce to these children. This study aimed to describe the use of AAC by children with CCN in Malaysia as reported by their parents.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

An online survey distributed for this study was completed by 235 parents.

RESULTS

Most of the parents of children with CCN who participated in this study reported that their children used low-tech AAC systems. A majority of respondents were satisfied with their child's AAC system. Parental satisfaction was positively associated with the frequency of use and whether the use of AAC helped parents understand the child better. Challenges reported by parents when using AAC and the reason some families abandoned the use of AAC were similar. Examples of challenges include parents having limited time and the child lacking the motivation to use the AAC system.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest the importance of SLPs actively involving parents in the selection of their children's AAC system so they are agreeable with the system introduced and continuously supporting children and their families to encourage and sustain the use of AAC. Implications for rehabilitationSpeech-language pathologists (SLPs) can create communication opportunities for the child to use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and experience success, teach parents how to incorporate AAC into the family's daily routine and activities, and reduce the demands on parents by preparing the AAC materials and programming the AAC system where possible.SLPs can provide ongoing support to school teachers to equip them with the necessary knowledge and skills to support the use of AAC in the classroom.

"Finding Common Ground" - Impact of a Complex Intervention on Collaboration in Augmentative and Alternative Communication Care of People without Natural Speech

Purpose

Many care settings are characterized by collaboration between a variety of stakeholders. People without natural speech who rely on augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are often strongly dependent on the involved stakeholders and collaboration among them. Since collaboration can be challenged by many barriers, this study examines the impact of a complex intervention on collaboration in AAC care.

Methods

In a quasi-experimental mixed methods intervention study which include AAC training, AAC therapy and case management, caregivers of AAC users were surveyed at 3 time points to assess collaboration and case management in the intervention versus comparison group. In addition, semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with caregivers in the intervention group. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and by comparison of means. Qualitative data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results

The Mann-Whitney U-test showed significantly better collaboration in the intervention group with stakeholders that are more actively involved in AAC care, such as schools (p=0.026) and residential or social facilities (p=0.010), but not with passive stakeholders such as health insurance companies. Most aspects of case management were rated significantly better in the intervention group (p<0.001). The focus group results show mainly positive changes in collaboration with the active stakeholders, such as more commitment and openness toward AAC.

Conclusion

The results show a positive impact of the intervention on the collaboration between stakeholders involved in AAC care - especially with active stakeholders. In particular, the organization of care and the accompanying case management by the AAC consultation centers seem to positively affect collaboration.

Parents’ Perceptions and Experiences with Their Children’s Use of Augmentative/Alternative Communication: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Synthesis

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) consists of any method of communicating that supplements or completely substitutes oral and/or written language when it is impaired. Therefore, it enables children with complex communication needs to develop their full communicative potential. However, despite the many benefits of AAC and its widespread use, several review studies have underscored the problems faced by parents and children who use AAC in their daily lives. The general objective of this systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis is to provide a complete overview of parents’ experiences and perceptions with their children’s use of AAC. Specifically, it aimed to identify common themes and subthemes of interest and to analyze the research quality of the selected studies. An exhaustive literature search was carried out using different electronic databases. Nineteen studies were included, involving 297 parents. A thematic synthesis was undertaken. Three main themes and nine subthemes were identified: service support (accessibility, providers and coordination); characteristics of AAC systems (usability and acceptability, features, cost and funding); and integration of AAC in daily life (family, school, social and community). Findings raise a need for more services that support children with complex communication deficits in different contexts, more functional use of AAC systems at school and in real-world situations, as well as service assistance over an extended time period.

Following children with severe or profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and their mothers through a communication intervention: single-case mixed-methods findings

There is limited research targeting communication interventions for children with severe/profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. This study addressed outcomes from a communication course for parents of children with severe/profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and follows up on a previous publication by Rensfeldt Flink et al. (2020). Potential observable changes in the children's and parents' communicative behavior were studied as well as the parents' experiences of the intervention process and the effect of the course on parent-child communication. A mixed-methods design with a case-study framework was used. Two mother-child dyads participated. Data were collected before, during, and after the course. Video-recorded repeated play interactions by the dyads were coded and analyzed for the mothers' responsivity and use of augmentative and alternative communication and the children's interactive engagement. Longitudinal interview data from the mothers were analyzed thematically. No clear signs of behavioral change were observed in the coded video data. However, thematic analyses showed that the mothers experienced changes to communicative behaviors. Moreover, the course affected both mothers' reasoning about communication with their child and their child's communicative needs. The mothers' narratives contributed insights into how reflective processes might guide action in parent-mediated communication interventions. The implications for research and clinical practice are discussed.

Speech language pathologists' responses to the rejection or abandonment of AAC systems

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the reported responses of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to the rejection or abandonment of AAC systems for children with complex communication needs.Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 16 SLPs who worked with children with complex communication needs. Interviews were transcribed and coded using thematic analysis.Results: Four themes describing SLPs' responses were identified: (1) SLPs work with families; (2) SLPs respect families' wishes; (3) SLPs "push ahead" with AAC irrespective of families' wishes; and (4) SLPs reflect and acknowledge emotions.Conclusions: SLPs varied in the degree to which they remained family-centred and utilised clinical reflection following the rejection or abandonment of AAC systems for the children they worked with. SLPs also described experiencing a range of negative emotions following the rejection or abandonment of an AAC system, which could impact upon ongoing client care.Implications for RehabilitationIn this research SLPs reported variability in the degree to which they remained family-centred following the rejection or abandonment of an AAC system for the children they worked with.SLPs should reflect on their emotional responses to the rejection or abandonment of AAC systems by their clients.This research suggests that SLP services should consider monitoring the reflective practices of their clinicians to ensure ongoing clinical development and optimisation of client care.