Recommendations for screening of donor and recipient prior to solid organ transplantation and to minimize transmission of donor–derived infections

Controlling infections in hospitalized pretransplant candidates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infections in hospitalized patients awaiting solid organ transplantation can pose complicated diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Goals of management include stabilizing the patient, treating or controlling infections, and decreasing the risk of reactivation of infection after transplant.

RECENT FINDINGS

Groups such as The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases have updated their guidelines on screening and treatment of infection in transplant candidates. There are also recent developments in therapeutic options for tuberculosis, COVID-19, Clostridioides difficile colitis, bloodstream infections, and other common infections.

SUMMARY

Ideally, antimicrobial therapy should be complete prior to transplantation. In situations in which completion of therapy prior to transplant is not feasible, therapy may need to be prolonged or modified. In most situations, infections can be managed similarly to the general population, although some infections, particularly fungal and mycobacterial, require a different management approach. We review disease- and organ-specific management.

Routine Infectious Disease Consultation Prior to an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Background

A transplant infectious disease (TID) assessment is essential to select recipients for an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and tailor prophylactic and empirical treatment recommendations.

Methods

We performed a retrospective single-center study to describe our model of care based on a routine TID consultation prior to an allogeneic HCT between 2018 and 2022 in 292 adult (≥18-year-old) consecutive patients. We describe the performance of a TID consultation, arbitrarily defined as major (HCT postponement, procedure, cytomegalovirus [CMV] recipient serology reinterpretation) and minor interventions.

Results

Overall, 765 interventions were observed in 257 of 292 (88%) patients: 88 of 765 (11.5%) major and 677 of 765 (88.5%) minor interventions. Among major interventions, HCT was postponed in 8 of 292 (2.7%) patients and a procedure was requested in 18 of 292 (6.2%) patients. The CMV recipient serostatus was changed from indeterminate/low-titer positive to negative in 60 of 292 (20.5%) patients. Among 677 minor interventions, there were 68 (8.8%) additional consultations with other services requested, 260 (33.7%) additional diagnostic tests requested, 102 (13.2%) additional treatments recommended, 60 (7.8%) non-CMV serology reinterpretations performed, 115 (14.9%) deviations from routine anti-infective prophylaxis, and 72 (9.3%) deviations from routine empirical antibiotic treatment recommendations in case of neutropenic fever.

Conclusions

We are proposing a structured, clearly defined, and comprehensive pretransplant checklist for an effective assessment of infectious disease risks and complications prior to an allogeneic HCT. Further studies or experiences like ours could help to define a global strategy or new models of care to be implemented in HCT centers in the future.

Optimal Perioperative Antimicrobial Management Strategies of Kidney Transplant Recipients Guided by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing of Deceased Donors' Microbiology Samples

Background

There is no consensus on the optimal use of perioperative antibiotics prophylaxis after kidney transplantation, but there is a common trend to limit the duration of antibiotic use worldwide. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has emerged as a novel technology for pathogen detection in clinical practice due to its noninvasive, rapid, precise and high susceptibility to detect infectious pathogens. However, data are lacking on whether mNGS analyses could be used to detect pathogens and guide anti-infection regimens in kidney transplant donors and recipients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study to review all clinic data of mNGS and traditional laboratory methods (TMs) for pathogen detection in kidney transplant recipients and their corresponding deceased donors from August 1, 2021 to October 30, 2022 in our center.

Results

A total of 57 donors and 112 of their corresponding recipients were included. The antimicrobial strategy mainly depended on mNGS results combined with traditional pathogen culture and clinical conditions. The percentages of positive pathogen detected by mNGS in blood, urine, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and preservation fluids (PFs) were 50.9% (29/57), 35.1% (20/57), 84.2% (48/57) and 54.4% (31/57) respectively, and were 24.6% (14/57), 15.8% (9/57), 57.9% (33/57) and 14.1% (8/57) respectively when using TMs. mNGS could detected all of pathogens which were detected by TMs. However, samples with negative TMs testing can be additionally detected as positive by mNGS (15/43 in blood, 11/48 in urine, 15/24 in BALF and 23/49 in PFs). Drug resistance genes were detected in 9 donors by mNGS,which were consistent with 6 donors by TMs. There was only one case of donor-derived infection in this study.

Conclusion

This study showed that it is effective to combine mNGS with traditional pathogen detection methods and clinical features to develop optimal perioperative antimicrobial management strategies for deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Infections after organ transplantation and immune response

Organ transplantation has provided another chance of survival for end-stage organ failure patients. Yet, transplant rejection is still a main challenging factor. Immunosuppressive drugs have been used to avoid rejection and suppress the immune response against allografts. Thus, immunosuppressants increase the risk of infection in immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. The infection risk reflects the relationship between the nature and severity of immunosuppression and infectious diseases. Furthermore, immunosuppressants show an immunological impact on the genetics of innate and adaptive immune responses. This effect usually reactivates the post-transplant infection in the donor and recipient tissues since T-cell activation has a substantial role in allograft rejection. Meanwhile, different infections have been found to activate the T-cells into CD₄⁺ helper T-cell subset and CD₈⁺ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte that affect the infection and the allograft. Therefore, the best management and preventive strategies of immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and intensive medical care are required for successful organ transplantation. This review addresses the activation of immune responses against different infections in immunocompromised individuals after organ transplantation.

Transplantation and immigration: Comparing infectious complications and outcomes between foreign-born and US-born kidney transplant recipients in Minnesota

BACKGROUND

Foreign-born kidney transplant recipients (FBKTRs) are at increased risk for reactivation of latent infections that may impact outcomes. We aimed to compare the etiology of infections and outcomes between FBKTR and United States KTRs (USKTR).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 at two transplant centers in Minnesota. Frequency and etiology of infections as well as outcomes (graft function, rejection, and patient survival) at 1-year post-transplant between FBKTR and USKTR were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 573 transplant recipients, 124 (21.6%) were foreign-born and 449 (78.4%) US-born. At least one infection occurred in 411 (71.7%) patients (38.2% bacterial, 55% viral, 9.4% fungal). Viral infections were more frequent in FBKTR, particularly BK viremia (38.7% vs. 21.2%, p < .001). No statistical differences were found for bacterial or fungal infections; no parasitic infections were identified in either group. No geographically-restricted infections were noted aside from a single case of Madura foot in a FBKTR. Rejection episodes were more common in USKTR (p = .037), but stable/improving graft function (p = .976) and mortality (p = .451) at 1-year posttransplantation were similar in both groups. After adjusting for covariates, previous transplantation was associated with a higher number of infections (IRR 1.35, 95% confidence intervals 1.05-1.73, p = .020).

CONCLUSION

Although viral infections were more frequent in FBKTR, overall frequency and etiology of most infections and outcomes were similar between FBKTR and USKTR suggesting that comprehensive transplant care is providing timely prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of latent infections in FBKTR.

Analysis of Donor to Recipient Pathogen Transmission in Relation to Cold Ischemic Time and Other Selected Aspects of Lung Transplantation-Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Infections are one of the leading causes of death in the early postoperative period after lung transplantation (LuTx).

METHODS

We analyzed 59 transplantations and culture results of the donor bronchial aspirates (DBA), graft endobronchial swabs (GES), and recipient cultures (RC) before and after the procedure (RBA). We correlated the results with a cold ischemic time (CIT), recipient intubation time, and length of stay in the hospital and intensive care unit (ICU), among others.

RESULTS

CIT of the first and second lungs were 403 and 541 min, respectively. Forty-two and eighty-three percent of cultures were positive in DBA and GES, respectively. Furthermore, positive results were obtained in 79.7% of RC and in 33.9% of RBA. Longer donor hospitalization was correlated with Gram-negative bacteria isolation in DBA. Longer CIT was associated with Gram-positive bacteria other than Staphylococcus aureus in GES and it resulted in longer recipient stay in the ICU. Furthermore, longer CIT resulted in the development of the new pathogens in RBA.

CONCLUSION

Results of GES brought more clinically relevant information than DBA. Donor hospitalization was associated with the occurrence of Gram-negative bacteria. Positive cultures of DBA, GES, and RBA were not associated with recipient death.

ERRATUM: Kidney decontamination during perfusion for transplantation procedure: In vitro and ex vivo viability analysis

Organ transplantations have an increasing medical relevance. It is becoming a regular procedure with an increase in individuals waiting for organs. The increase in the number of discarded organs is mostly due to the donor's bacterial and/or viral infection. In this article, we are demonstrating the feasibility of reduction of the bacterial load in the kidney model by using Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) as a germicidal agent in circulating liquids. Using Staphylococcus aureus as a bacteria model, we were able to demonstrate that in less than 30 min of liquid circulation and associated to irradiation, the bacterial load of the perfusate Custodiol® HTK, histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (solution with 5 log CFU ml^-1 ), was fully eliminated. A modeling approach was created to verify the possibility of bacterial load decrease, when an organ (here, a renal experimental model) is present in the circuit, releasing a varied rate of microorganisms over time, while the solution is irradiated. Finally, we use an ex vivo model with a swine kidney, circulating in the preservation solution with a Lifeport® Kidney Transporter machine, to demonstrate that we can contaminate the organ and then promote the elimination of the microbiological load. The results show the feasibility of the technique.

Donor-Derived Infection's Prevention and Control in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to summarize the experience of donor selection and recipient therapy in the face of potential donor-derived infections and improve the quality of donor organ utilization, which would help reduce the risk of infection after recipient operation and decrease the risk of loss or even death of recipient kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In this study, 132 kidneys from 70 donors and their recipients who underwent surgery between July 2017 and January 2021 were studied to perform a retrospective analysis of their etiologic examination results and treatment process.

RESULTS

In the 70 donors, only 25 had negative etiologic examination results, accounting for 35.71%. Among the 132 recipients, 31.82% had positive culture results, 3 (2.27%) experienced donor-derived infections, and one died.

CONCLUSIONS

Although infection in the donor before the donation is quite common, the incidence of donor-derived infections is relatively low. The targeted and preventive application of adequate sensitive antibiotics in the whole course of therapy was the cornerstone for treating recipients at potential risk of potential donor-derived infection. The changes in infection indicators in the recipient should be closely monitored, which would guide medication adjustments timely. These measures could, to a great degree, ensure the prognosis of the recipient, in turn reducing the adverse events caused by donor-derived infections.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

The impact of preservation fluid culture on graft site arteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of culturing the graft preservation fluid (PF) is controversial and its impact on graft arteritis development remains unclear.

METHODS

Systematic literature search retrieving observational studies comparing solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with culture-positive PF versus culture-negative PF. The quality of included studies was independently assessed according to the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Mantel-Haenszel random-effect models. Graft site arteritis within 180 days from transplant was selected as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty-one observational studies (N = 2208 positive PF vs. 4458 negative) were included. Among positive PF, 857 (38.8%) were classified as high-risk group pathogens and 1351 (61.2%) as low-risk pathogens. Low-risk and negative PF showed similar odds ratios. A significant higher risk of graft arteritis was found in SOT recipients with a PF yielding a high-risk pathogen (odds ratio [OR] 18.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.83-43.40) compared to low-risk and negative PF, with low heterogeneity (I² = 2.24%). Similar results were found considering separately high-risk bacteria (OR 12.02, 95%CI 4.88-29.60) and fungi (OR 71.00, 95%CI 28.07-179.56), with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%), and in the subgroup analyses of the liver (OR 16.78, 95%CI 2.95-95.47) and kidney (OR 19.90, 95%CI 4.78-82.79) recipients. However, data about diagnostic features of graft arteritis were very limited, indeed for only 11 of the 93 events histological or microbiological results were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results may support the performance of PF culturing and a preemptive diagnostic or therapeutic management upon isolation of high-risk pathogens. Further studies based on a reliable diagnosis of graft arteritis are needed.

Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can benefit from traditional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities directed to improve judicious perioperative prescribing and management, but evidence is lacking. The aim of this expert opinion review is to provide an update on the current landscape of application of AMS practices for optimization of perioperative prophylaxis (PP).

METHODS

We reviewed the available literature on early postoperative infectious complications in SOT and PP management, on modified perioperative approaches in case of infection or colonization in recipients and donors and on AMS in transplantation PP.

RESULTS

SOT recipients are at high risk for early postoperative infectious complications due to the complexity of surgical procedures, severity of end stage organ disease, net state of immunosuppression in the posttransplant period and to the high risk for multidrug resistant organism. Moreover, SOT may be exposed to preservation fluid infections and expected or unexpected donor-derived infections. We summarize main factors to take into account when prescribing transplant PP.

CONCLUSION

Creating personalized PP to avoid unwanted consequences of antimicrobials while improving outcomes is an emerging and critical aspect in SOT setting. Further studies are needed to offer best PP tailored to SOT type and to evaluate interventions efficacy and safety.

Recommendations for Evaluation and Selection of Deceased Organ Donor: Position Statement of ISCCM

There is a wide gap between patients who need transplants and the organs that are available in India. Extending the standard donation criterion is certainly important to address the scarcity of organs for transplantation. Intensivists play a major role in the success of deceased donor organ transplants. Recommendations for deceased donor organ evaluation are not discussed in most intensive care guidelines. The purpose of this position statement is to establish current evidence-based recommendations for multiprofessional critical care staff in the evaluation, assessment, and selection of potential organ donors. These recommendations will give "real-world" criteria that are acceptable in the Indian context. The aim of this set of recommendations is to both increase the number and enhance the quality of transplantable organs.

How to cite this article

Zirpe KG, Tiwari AM, Pandit RA, Govil D, Mishra RC, Samavedam S, et al. Recommendations for Evaluation and Selection of Deceased Organ Donor: Position Statement of ISCCM. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(S2):S43-S50.

Notifiable Infectious Diseases Among Organ Transplant Recipients: A Data-Linked Cohort Study, 2000–2015

Background

Infections, including common communicable infections such as influenza, frequently cause disease after organ transplantation, although the quantitative extent of infection and disease remains uncertain.

Methods

A cohort study was conducted to define the burden of notifiable infectious diseases among all solid organ recipients transplanted in New South Wales, Australia, 2000–2015. Data linkage was used to connect transplant registers to hospital admissions, notifiable diseases, and the death register. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated relative to general population notification rates, accounting for age, sex, and calendar year. Infection-related hospitalizations and deaths were identified.

Results

Among 4858 solid organ recipients followed for 39 183 person-years (PY), there were 792 notifications. Influenza was the most common infection (532 cases; incidence, 1358 [95% CI, 1247–1478] per 100 000 PY), highest within 3 months posttransplant. Next most common was salmonellosis (46 cases; incidence, 117 [95% CI, 87–156] per 100 000 PY), then pertussis (38 cases; incidence, 97 [95% CI, 71–133] per 100 000 PY). Influenza and invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) showed significant excess cases compared with the general population (influenza SIR, 8.5 [95% CI, 7.8–9.2]; IPD SIR, 9.8 [95% CI, 6.9–13.9]), with high hospitalization rates (47% influenza cases, 68% IPD cases) and some mortality (4 influenza and 1 IPD deaths). By 10 years posttransplant, cumulative incidence of any vaccine-preventable disease was 12%, generally similar by transplanted organ, except higher among lung recipients. Gastrointestinal diseases, tuberculosis, and legionellosis had excess cases among transplant recipients, although there were few sexually transmitted infections and vector-borne diseases.

Conclusions

There is potential to avoid preventable infections among transplant recipients with improved vaccination programs, health education, and pretransplant donor and recipient screening.

Machine perfusion combined with antibiotics prevents donor-derived infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria

Donor infection affects organ utilization, especially the infections by multidrug-resistant bacteria, which may have disastrous outcomes. We established a rat model, inoculated with Escherichia coli or carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), to investigate whether hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), or static cold storage (SCS) combined with antibiotic (AB) could eliminate the bacteria. E. coli or CRKP-infected kidneys were treated with cefoperazone-sulbactam and tigecycline, respectively. The HMP+AB and NMP+AB treatments had significant therapeutic effects on E. coli or CRKP infection compared with the SCS+AB treatment. The bacterial load of CRKP-infected kidneys in the HMP+AB (22 050 ± 2884 CFU/g vs. 1900 ± 400 CFU/g, p = .007) and NMP+AB groups (25 433 ± 2059 CFU/g vs. 500 ± 458 CFU/g, p = .002) were significantly reduced, with no statistically significant difference between both groups. Subsequently, the CRKP-infected kidneys of the HMP+AB and SCS+AB groups were transplanted. The rats in the SCS+AB group were severe infected and euthanized on day 4 post-transplant. By contrast, the rats in the HMP+AB group were in good condition. In conclusion, HMP and NMP combined with AB seems to be efficient approaches to decrease bacterial load of infected kidneys. This might lead to higher utilization rates of donors with active infection.

Strongyloides hyper-infection in a lung transplant recipient: Case report and review of the literature

CASE PRESENTATION

A 63-year-old man with a left single lung transplant for end-stage combined restrictive and obstructive lung disease developed persistent pulmonary infiltrates and recurrent gram-negative bacteremia post-transplant. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid revealed a nematode on Papanicolau staining compatible with Strongyloides stercoralis larvae on day 50 post-transplant. Although Strongyloides serology performed post-transplant was negative, a retrospective review of the medical record revealed marked peripheral blood eosinophilia on several occasions before transplantation. Despite reduction in immunosuppression and treatment with albendazole and ivermectin, the patient developed another episode of Escherichia coli bacteremia. He died 3 months post-transplant from pulmonary and neurological complications.

DIAGNOSIS

Strongyloides hyper-infection.

DISCUSSION

Strongyloides hyper-infection syndrome is known to occur in immunocompromised patients, but it has only been reported once in a lung transplant recipient. This case illustrates the importance of screening for parasitic infections before transplantation in patients with marked eosinophilia, especially among immigrants from countries in which Strongyloides is endemic. Hyper-infection syndrome may appear years after infection in the context of immunosuppression or immunodeficiency. This case also highlights the association between Strongyloides hyper-infection and bacteremia with enteric organisms.

Kidney transplant from donors with hepatitis B: A challenging treatment option

Utilizing kidneys from donors with hepatitis B is one way to alleviate the current organ shortage situation. However, the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission remains a challenge that undermines the chance of organs being used. This is particularly true with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive donors despite the comparable long-term outcomes when compared with standard donors. To reduce the risk of HBV transmission, a comprehensive approach is needed. This includes assessment of donor risk, optimal allocation to the proper recipient, appropriate immunosuppressive regimen, optimizing the prophylactic therapy, and post-transplant monitoring. This review provides an overview of current evidence of kidney transplants from donors with HBsAg positivity and outlines the challenge of this treatment. The topics include donor risk assessment by adopting the nucleic acid test coupled with HBV DNA as the HBV screening, optimal recipient selection, importance of hepatitis B immunity, role of nucleos(t)ide analogues, and hepatitis B immunoglobulin. A summary of reported long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation and proposed criteria to utilize kidneys from this group of donors was also defined and discussed.

Donor-Derived Tuberculosis: A Case Report and the Role of Communication Gaps in Transplantation Safety

Donor-derived tuberculosis (DD-TB) accounts for less than 5% of TB cases and is considered a rare event. In the transplant setting, the frequency of active TB is estimated to be 20 to 74 times higher than that in the general population, and it is associated with high mortality. In this context, the main strategy to minimize the risk of DD transmission is to identify high-risk donors. Despite screening recommendations, failures may result in a breakdown of safety that ends in the transmission of potentially fatal diseases. This report describes a case of DD-TB and emphasizes communication gaps that may occur between organ procurement organizations and transplant centers. Failure in reporting results, lack of exchanging information regarding recipients from the same donor, and inefficient communication between organ procurement organizations and transplant centers are lacks that may be prevented by a more efficient approach towards screening protocols and communication.

Clinical Impacts and Outcomes With Possible Donor-Derived Infection in Infected Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in China

BACKGROUND

Information on possible donor-derived transmission events in China is limited. We evaluated the impacts of liver transplantation from infected deceased-donors, analyzed possible donor-derived bacterial or fungal infection events in recipients, and evaluated the etiologic agents' characteristics and cases outcomes.

METHODS

A single-center observational study was performed from January 2015 to March 2017 to retrospectively collect data from deceased-donors diagnosed with infection. Clinical data were recorded for each culture-positive donor and the matched liver recipient. The microorganisms were isolated and identified, and antibiotic sensitivity testing was performed. The pathogens distribution and incidence of possible donor-derived infection (P-DDI) events were analyzed and evaluated.

RESULTS

Information from 211 donors was collected. Of these, 82 donors were infected and classified as the donation after brain death category. Overall, 149 and 138 pathogens were isolated from 82 infected donors and 82 matched liver recipients, respectively. Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi accounted for 42.3% (63 of 149), 46.3% (69 of 149), and 11.4% (17 of 149) of pathogens in infected donors. The incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria was high and Acinetobacter baumannii was the most concerning species. Infections occurred within the first 2 weeks after liver transplantation with an organ from an infected donor. Compared with the noninfection recipient group, the infection recipient group experienced a longer mechanical ventilation time (P = .004) and intensive care unit stay (P = .003), a higher incidence of renal dysfunction (P = .026) and renal replacement therapy (P = .001), and higher hospital mortality (P = .015). Possible donor-derived infection was observed in 14.6% of cases. Recipients with acute-on-chronic liver failure were more prone to have P-DDI than recipients with other diseases (P = .007; odds ratio = 0.114; 95% confidence interval, .025-.529).

CONCLUSIONS

When a liver recipient receives a graft from an infected deceased-donor, the postoperative incidence of infection is high and the infection interval is short. In addition, when a possible donor-derived, drug-resistant bacterial infection occurs, recipients may have serious complications and poor outcomes.

The effect of universal infant vaccination on the prevalence of hepatitis B immunity in adult solid organ transplant candidates

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunity is recommended to optimize outcomes after solid organ transplantation (SOT). This study assessed the prevalence and predictors of HBV immunity at the time patients were placed on transplant waiting list over a period from 1997 to 2019 in a low HBV endemic region.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the University Hospitals Leuven transplant database. Minors and patients with past/current HBV infection were excluded. From 1986, Belgian patients are covered by the universal infant vaccination; therefore, birth cohort was stratified in those born ≥1986 vs <1986.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 3297 SOT candidates. HBV immunity rate was superior in renal transplant candidates (55.3%), and this number was 21.5%, 15.4% and 16.8% for liver, cardiac and pulmonary transplant candidates, respectively, P < .001. Among liver transplant candidates, HBV immunity rate was 14.8% in decompensated cirrhotic patients and 27.9% in those without advanced cirrhosis (P < .001). The overall immunity rate increased from 19.3% in period 1997-2008 to 32.8% in 2009-2019, P < .001. In multivariable analyses, younger age (odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97-0.98, P < .001) and birth cohort ≥ 1986 (OR 95% CI: 1.18-2.66, P = .006) were associated with increased HBV immunity.

CONCLUSION

An increase in HBV immunity was observed over a 20-year period related to the introduction of universal infant HBV vaccination. Nevertheless, this study highlights the low overall HBV immunity at the time of listing for organ transplantation and points out the need of an increased awareness and vaccination strategy at an early disease stage.

Effectiveness of short vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant recipients with donor positive respiratory cultures

Lung transplant recipients are at increased risk for infection in the early postoperative phase, thus perioperative antibiotics are employed. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of short- vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant patients. Lung transplant patients with donor positive cultures between August 2013 and September 2019 were evaluated, excluding those with cystic fibrosis, death within 14 days and re-transplants. The primary outcome was 30-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection. A total of 147 patients were included (57 short vs 90 long-course). Median perioperative antibiotic duration was 6 days in the short-course vs 14 days in the long-course group (P < .0001). Thirty-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection was present in 56 (98%) patients in the short-course vs 85 (94%) patients in the long-course group (P = .41). There was no difference in development of Clostridioides difficile infections (P = .41), while cumulative ventilator time and time to post-op extubation were longer in the long-course group (P = .001 and .004, respectively). Among lung transplant recipients with positive donor respiratory cultures, short-course perioperative antibiotics were as effective as long-course antibiotics in preventing donor-derived bacterial respiratory infections.

Routine Bile Culture From Liver Donors as Screening of Donor-Transmitted Infections in Liver Transplantation

Bacterial infections are an important threat in the early post-liver transplantation period. Donor-transmitted infections, although rare, can have high mortality. The utility of routine culture from the donor bile duct as screening of donor-transmitted infection has not been evaluated. We performed a retrospective study of 200 consecutive liver transplants between 2010 and 2015. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological data were collected from the recipients' medical records. Clinical data included pretransplantation, perioperative, and posttransplantation information (until 30 days after the procedure). The 3-month patient survival and/or retransplantation were recorded. A total of 157 samples from the donor bile duct were collected and cultured. Only 8 were positive. The microorganisms isolated were as follows: Klebsiella pneumoniae, n = 2; Escherichia coli, n = 1; Enterobacter cloacae, n = 1; Streptococcus anginosus, n = 1; Streptococcus sp., n = 1; multiple gram-negative bacilli, n = 1; and polymicrobial, n = 1. All of the microorganisms were susceptible to the antibiotic prophylaxis administered. During the first month after transplantation, 81 recipients developed 131 infections. Only 1 of these recipients had a donor with a positive bile culture, and none of the infections were due to the microorganism isolated in the donor's bile. The 3-month overall survival was 89.5%, and there were no differences between recipients with positive donor bile cultures and those with negative donor bile cultures (87.5% versus 89.26%; P > 0.99). Routine testing of donor bile cultures does not predict recipients' infection or survival after liver transplantation and should not be recommended.

Practical Considerations for Solid Organ Transplantation During the COVID-19 Global Outbreak: The Experience from Singapore

The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has not only caused global social disruptions but has also put tremendous strain on healthcare systems worldwide. With all attention and significant effort diverted to containing and managing the COVID-19 outbreak (and understandably so), essential medical services such as transplant services are likely to be affected. Closure of transplant programs in an outbreak caused by a highly transmissible novel pathogen may be inevitable owing to patient safety. Yet program closure is not without harm; patients on the transplant waitlist may die before the program reopens. By adopting a tiered approach based on outbreak disease alert levels, and having hospital guidelines based on the best available evidence, life-saving transplants can still be safely performed. We performed a lung transplant and a liver transplant successfully during the COVID-19 era. We present our guidelines and experience on managing the transplant service as well as the selection and management of donors and recipients. We also discuss clinical dilemmas in the management COVID-19 in the posttransplant recipient.

Clinical epigenetics and multidrug-resistant bacterial infections: host remodelling in critical illness

The inappropriate use of antibiotics in man is driving to insurgence of pathogenic bacteria resistant to multiple drugs (MDR) representing a challenge in critical illness. The interaction of MDR bacteria with host cells can guide molecular perturbations of host transcriptional programmes involving epigenetic-sensitive mechanisms, mainly DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs leading to pathogen survival. Clinical evidence of epigenetic manipulation from MDR bacteria mainly arises from Mycobacterium tuberculosis as well as Helicobacter pylori, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Legionella pneumophila infection suggesting possible biomarkers of disease. For example, DNA hypermethylation of E-cadherin (CDH1), upstream transcription factor 1/2 (USF1/2), WW domain containing oxidoreductase (WWOX), and mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) genes in gastric mucosa is correlated with malignancy suggesting useful biomarkers of early disease state. Moreover, upregulated circulating miR-361-5p, miR-889, miR-576-3p may be useful biomarkers to discriminate tuberculosis patients. Moreover, Listeria monocytogenes can indirectly induce H3 hyperacetylation leading to inflammation in human endothelial cells whereas Pseudomonas aeruginosa excretes QS 2-AA to directly induce H3 deacetylation leading to bacterial persistence in human monocytes. Remarkably, epigenetic-sensitive drugs may aid to counteract MDR in clinical setting. Trichostatin A, a histone deacetyltransferase inhibitor (HDACi), leads to AMP β-defensin 2 (HBD2) gene up-regulation in human epithelial cells suggesting a useful 'epi-therapy' for Escherichia coli-induced intestinal diseases. We update on the most current clinical studies focusing on epigenetic changes involved in bacterial-host interactions and their putative role as biomarkers or drug targets to improve precision medicine and personalized therapy in critical illness and transplantation setting.

Standard work-up of the low-risk kidney transplant candidate: a European expert survey of the ERA-EDTA Developing Education Science and Care for Renal Transplantation in European States Working Group

BACKGROUND

Existing guidelines on the evaluation and preparation of recipients for kidney transplantation target the entire spectrum of patients with end-stage renal disease. Within the ERA-EDTA Developing Education Science and Care for Renal Transplantation in European States (DESCARTES) Working Group, it was proposed that in a subset of relatively young patients (<40 years) without significant comorbidities (such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease), the work-up for transplantation could be restricted to a small set of tests.

METHODS

Aiming for agreement between transplant centres across Europe, we surveyed the opinion of 80 transplant professionals from 11 European states on the composition of a minimal work-up.

RESULTS

We show that there is a wide agreement among European experts that the work-up for kidney transplantation of the low-risk candidate, as opposed to the standard risk candidate, could include a limited number of investigations. However, there is some disagreement regarding the small number of diagnostic procedures, which is related to geographical location within Europe and the professional background of respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of the survey, published guidelines and expert meetings by the DESCARTES Working Group, we have formulated a proposal for the work-up of low-risk kidney transplant candidates.

Adult liver transplantation: UK clinical guideline - part 2: surgery and post-operation

Survival rates for patients following liver transplantation exceed 90% at 12 months and approach 70% at 10 years. Part 1 of this guideline has dealt with all aspects of liver transplantation up to the point of placement on the waiting list. Part 2 explains the organ allocation process, organ donation and organ type and how this influences the choice of recipient. After organ allocation, the transplant surgery and the critical early post-operative period are, of necessity, confined to the liver transplant unit. However, patients will eventually return to their referring secondary care centre with a requirement for ongoing supervision. Part 2 of this guideline concerns three key areas of post liver transplantation care for the non-transplant specialist: (1) overseeing immunosuppression, including interactions and adherence; (2) the transplanted organ and how to initiate investigation of organ dysfunction; and (3) careful oversight of other organ systems, including optimising renal function, cardiovascular health and the psychosocial impact. The crucial significance of this holistic approach becomes more obvious as time passes from the transplant, when patients should expect the responsibility for managing the increasing number of non-liver consequences to lie with primary and secondary care.

Selection criteria of solid organ donors in relation to infectious diseases: A Spanish consensus

The immunosuppressive treatment that recipients receive from a solid organ transplantation hinders the defensive response to infection. Its transmission from the donor can cause dysfunction or loss of the graft and even death of the recipient if proper preventive measures are not established. This potential risk should be thoroughly evaluated to minimise the risk of infection transmission from donor to recipient, especially with organ transplantation from donors with infections, without increasing graft dysfunction and morbidity and mortality in the recipient. This document aims to review current knowledge about infection screening in potential donors and offer clinical and microbiological recommendations about the use of organs from donors with infection based on available scientific evidence.

Organ donor screening for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria in Italian intensive care units: the DRIn study

The 759 cases of brain death declaration (BDD [Italian law, 6 hours of observation time]) that occurred in 190 Italian intensive care units (ICUs) between May and September 2012 were studied to quantify carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GN) isolated in organ donors, to evaluate adherence to national screening guidelines, and to identify risk factors for CR-GN isolation. Mandatory blood, bronchoalveolar lavage, and urine cultures were performed on the BDD day in 99% of used donors. Because results were rarely made available before transplant, >20% of transplants were performed before obtaining any microbiological information, and organs from 15 of 22 CR-GN cases were used. Two (lung-liver) of the 37 recipients died, likely because of donor-derived early CR-GN sepsis. ICU stay >3 days (odds ratio [OR] = 7.49, P = .004), fever (OR = 3.11, P = .04), age <60 years (OR = 2.80, P = .06), and positive ICU epidemiology (OR = 8.77, P = .07) were associated with CR-GN isolation. An association between single ICU and risk of CR-GN was observed, as a result of differences across ICUs (ICC = 29%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5%-72%) probably related to inadequate practices of infection control. Continuous education aimed at implementing priority actions, including stewardship programs for a rational use of antimicrobials, is a priority in healthcare systems and transplant networks. Improved awareness among ICU personnel regarding the importance of early CR-GN detection and timely alert systems might facilitate decisions regarding organ suitability and eventually save recipient lives.

Donor-derived bacterial infections in lung transplant recipients in the era of multidrug resistance

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to analyze the prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in lung transplant donors and to evaluate its influence on donor-derived bacterial infections.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent lung transplantation (2013-2016) at our hospital. Donor-derived bacterial infection was defined as the isolation of the same bacteria with identical antibiotic susceptibility patterns in the recipient and the perioperative cultures from the donor during the first month posttransplantation. We utilized a preventive antibiotic strategy adapted to the bacteria identified in donor cultures using systemic and nebulized antibiotics.

RESULTS

252 lung transplant recipients and 243 donors were included. In 138/243 (56.8%) donors, one bacterial species was isolated from at least one sample; graft colonization (118/243; 48.6%), blood cultures (5/243; 2.1%) and the contamination of preservation fluids (56/243; 23%). Multidrug-resistant bacteria were isolated from 12/243 (4.9%) donors; four Enterobacterales, four Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, three Pseudomonas aeruginosa and one methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. There was no transmission of these multidrug-resistant bacteria. Donor-derived infections, primarily tracheobronchitis due to non-MDR bacteria, were diagnosed in 7/253 (2.9%) recipients, with good clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The lungs of donors colonized with multidrug-resistant bacteria may be safely used when recipients receive prompt tailored antibiotic treatment.

Very early-onset of Cryptococcus neoformans disease following liver transplantation: Report of two cases and a review of the literature

Cryptococcosis is the third most common invasive fungal infection following solid organ transplantation, and mortality is high. Most cases occur late and are due to reactivation of latent infection; however, very early reactivation and donor-derived transmission can occur. Routine screening pre-transplant and antifungal prophylaxis for cryptococcosis post-transplant in solid organ transplantation are not standard practice. We present two cases of very early-onset Cryptococcus neoformans disease following liver transplantation to highlight the need to consider individualized pre-transplant screening and be aware that reactivation of Cryptococcosis neoformans can occur in the immediate post-transplant period.

Brain Death and Management of Potential Organ Donor: An Indian Perspective

How to cite this article: Zirpe K, Gurav S. Brain Death and Management of Potential Organ Donor: An Indian Perspective. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(Suppl 2):S151-S156.

Donor-derived infections, lessons learnt from the past, and what is the future going to bring us

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Donor-derived transmission of infectious diseases is a well-recognized complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT). Most donor-derived disease transmissions are expected. Although uncommon, unexpected donor-derived infections can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and as the volume of patients undergoing SOT increases, the number of infections transmitted through organ donation can also be expected to rise. The growing gap between the number of patients waiting for transplantation and available organs continue in fact to be the number one issue facing the transplant community. As a consequence the major focus in organ transplantation has been developing strategies to increase the available organs, including the use of organs from donors with infections or risky behaviors that have disqualified them from the donation in the past.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to the commonly reported donor-derived transmissions, an increasing number of studies have reported unusual infections transmitted by SOT.

SUMMARY

Transplant surgeons and physicians should increase their awareness toward uncommon donor-derived infections including them in the differential diagnosis of unusual clinical pictures in their recipients.

Long-term care of transplant recipients: de novo neoplasms after liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since the first liver transplantation in the early 1960s, there have been significant improvements in the recipients' long-term outcome. Patients who have undergone transplantation are exposed to a high risk of developing neoplastic disease, not only because of their chronic immunosuppression, but also related to physiological aging, lifestyle, chronic viral infections, liver disease cause, and carcinogenic immunosuppressants. The present review covers the latest and most relevant data on de novo neoplasms after liver transplantation, and discusses their implications for clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the impact of de novo neoplasms, in terms of morbidity and mortality, transplant teams must be prepared to diagnose and treat these conditions promptly. Dedicated cancer screening protocols are warranted. Although surveillance strategies are based on data concerning the general population, they should be customized in the light of each transplant recipient's risk factors. The resulting risk stratification is crucially important to the design of early intervention programs, and for addressing the modulation of individualized immunosuppressive regimens.

SUMMARY

De novo malignancies are a significant issue for the liver transplant population, but targeted screening programs have shown that survival rates similar to those of nonimmunosuppressed patients can be achieved. New oncological surveillance strategies covering the prophylaxis, monitoring, and treatment of de novo neoplasms should take high priority in clinical research.

Seroprevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis and Evaluation of Universal Screening in Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Single-Center Experience in Houston (2012-2017)

Background

Disseminated strongyloidiasis in solid organ transplant recipients is a rare but devastating infection. In our center, we implemented a universal screening of all candidates for kidney transplantation. We assessed the seroprevalence and utility of universal screening for strongyloidiasis in our center.

Methods

Patients were identified from our transplant referral list (from July 2012 to June 2017). Demographics, pretransplant laboratory, and serological screenings were retrospectively collected. For Strongyloides-seropositive (SSp) patients, data on travel history, symptoms, treatment, and stool ova and parasite examinations were extracted. Logistic regression and multiple imputation for missing data were performed.

Results

A total of 1689 patients underwent serological screening, of whom 168 (9.9%) were SSp. Univariate analysis revealed that SSp patients had higher rates of eosinophilia, diabetes mellitus, latent tuberculosis and were likely to be either Hispanic or Asian (P < .05). In multivariate analysis, eosinophilia (P = .01), diabetes mellitus (P = .02), and Asian race (P = .03) were associated with being SSp, but 45 (27%) of the SSp patients did not have any of these 3 factors, and 18 SSp patients (11%) had no epidemiological risk factors. All patients received ivermectin, and none developed disseminated strongyloidiasis. Of patients who underwent serological screening on multiple occasions, 6.8% seroconverted while waiting for kidney transplantation.

Conclusions

We found a high rate of Strongyloides seropositivity among our kidney transplantation candidates. No epidemiological risk factors effectively predicted SSp status in our population, and universal screening identified a large number of patients without such factors. Serial screening should be considered when a long wait time is expected before transplantation.

Urinary tract infections in solid organ transplant recipients: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of urinary tract infections (UTI) in solid organ transplantation, focusing on kidney transplant (KT) recipients. KT recipients have unique risk factors for UTI, including indwelling stents and surgical manipulation of the genitourinary tract. KT recipients experience multi-drug antibiotic-resistant infections-UTI prevention and management strategies must consider risks of antimicrobial resistance. Non-antimicrobial prevention strategies for UTI in KT recipients are reviewed. It is important to recognize that some renal transplant recipients with UTI may primarily present with fever, malaise, leukocytosis, or a non-specific sepsis syndrome without symptoms localized to the urinary tract. However, asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) must be distinguished from UTI because AB is not necessarily a disease state. Accumulating data indicate that there are no benefits of antibiotics for treatment of AB in KT recipients more than 2 months after post-transplant. Further research is needed on management of AB in the early (<2 months) post-transplant period, prophylaxis for UTI in this era of antibiotic resistance, recurrent UTI, non-antimicrobial prevention of UTI, and uropathogens identified in donor urine and/or preservative fluid cultures.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to infectious diseases in solid organ transplant recipients

Purpose

Prognosis of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients has improved, mainly because of better prevention of rejection by immunosuppressive therapies. However, SOT recipients are highly susceptible to conventional and opportunistic infections, which represent a major cause of morbidity, graft dysfunction and mortality.

Methods

Narrative review.

Results

We cover the current epidemiology and main aspects of infections in SOT recipients including risk factors such as postoperative risks and specific risks for different transplant recipients, key points on anti-infective prophylaxis as well as diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. We provide an up-to-date guide for management of the main syndromes that can be encountered in SOT recipients including acute respiratory failure, sepsis or septic shock, and central nervous system infections as well as bacterial infections with multidrug-resistant strains, invasive fungal diseases, viral infections and less common pathogens that may impact this patient population.

Conclusion

We provide state-of the art review of available knowledge of critically ill SOT patients with infections.

Management of the brain-dead donor in the ICU: general and specific therapy to improve transplantable organ quality

PURPOSE

To provide a practical overview of the management of the potential organ donor in the intensive care unit.

METHODS

Seven areas of donor management were considered for this review: hemodynamic management; fluids and electrolytes; respiratory management; endocrine management; temperature management; anaemia and coagulation; infection management. For each subchapter, a narrative review was conducted.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Most elements in the current recommendations and guidelines are based on pathophysiological reasoning, epidemiological observations, or extrapolations from general ICU management strategies, and not on evidence from randomized controlled trials. The cardiorespiratory management of brain-dead donors is very similar to the management of critically ill patients, and the same applies to the management of anaemia and coagulation. Central diabetes insipidus is of particular concern, and should be diagnosed based on clinical criteria. Depending on the degree of vasopressor dependency, it can be treated with intermittent desmopressin or continuous vasopressin, intravenously. Temperature management of the donor is an area of uncertainty, but it appears reasonable to strive for a core temperature of > 35 °C. The indications and controversies regarding endocrine therapies, in particular thyroid hormone replacement therapy, and corticosteroid therapy, are discussed. The potential donor should be assessed clinically for infections, and screening tests for specific infections are an essential part of donor management. Although the rate of infection transmission from donor to receptor is low, certain infections are still a formal contraindication to organ donation. However, new antiviral drugs and strategies now allow organ donation from certain infected donors to be done safely.

Risk factors associated with contamination of allograft valves in a tissue bank

The contamination of the transport solution used in cardiovascular allografts can occur from different sources. Risk factors associated with positive microbiological test of transport solution have not been reported previously. This study aimed to determine the risk factor for contamination of transport solution used in the heart valve allografts stored in a Brazilian tissue bank. This retrospective study was conducted on all donors of cardiovascular allografts stored in a tissue bank from December 2008 to December 2017. Microbiological cultures for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, fungi/yeasts were carried out in TS. Clinical variables were included. From 1001 transport solution, 52% were contaminated. A total of 770 microorganisms were identified, and Staphylococcus spp. was identified in 248 isolates (32.2%). Skin bacteria from skin microbiota were the most commonly identified microorganisms (Staphylococcus spp., Cutibacterium spp., Corynebacterium spp., and Bacillus spp.), occurring in 49.6%. The presence of a diagnosis of healthcare-associated infection was not associated with skin contamination (odds ratio [OR] 0.62 [0.41-0.94]; p = 0.014). Conditions like fever, use of antibiotics, and leukocytosis were less likely associated with contamination of transport solution. A longer warm ischemic time was associated with higher frequency of contamination. In the multivariable analysis, warm ischemic time was independently associated with contamination, and antibiotic therapy was a factor that decreased the rate of contamination (p < 0.05). Contamination of transport solution is associated with modifiable risk factors, such as warm ischemic time. Measures to minimize contamination should be employed to avoid unnecessary tissue discharges.

Vaccinations in kidney transplant recipients: Clearing the muddy waters

Vaccine preventable diseases account for a significant proportion of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients and cause adverse outcomes to the patient and allograft. Patients should be screened for vaccination history at the time of pre-transplant evaluation and vaccinated at least four weeks prior to transplantation. For non-immune patients, dead-vaccines can be administered starting at six months post-transplant. Live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated after transplant due to concern for infectious complications from the vaccine and every effort should be made to vaccinate prior to transplant. Since transplant recipients are on life-long immunosuppression, these patients may have lower rates of serological conversion, lower mean antibody titers and waning of protective immunity over shorter period as compared to general population. Recommendations regarding booster dose in kidney transplant recipients with sub-optimal serological response are lacking. Travel plans should be part of routine post-transplant assessment and pre-travel vaccines and counseling should be provided. More studies are needed on vaccination schedules, serological response, need for booster doses and safety of live attenuated vaccines in this special population.

Infection in the process of organ donation

The difference between demand and supply has led transplant organizations to look for marginal donors, including those who could transmit infections to their recipients. This potential risk must be thoroughly evaluated to optimize the use of such organs without increasing the incidence of graft dysfunction and the morbidity and mortality of the recipient. This article aims to provide a general and up-to-date overview of this issue.

Is This Organ Donor Safe?: Donor-Derived Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation

Infection is an inevitable complication of solid organ transplantation. Unrecognized infection may be transmitted from a donor and result in disseminated disease in the immunosuppressed host. Recent outbreaks of deceased donor-derived infections resulting in high rates of mortality and severe morbidity have emphasized the need to be cautious in using donors with possible meningoencephalitis. Screening of organ donors for potential transmissible infections is paramount to improving transplantation outcomes.

Is This Organ Donor Safe?: Donor-Derived Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation

Infection is an inevitable complication of solid organ transplantation. Unrecognized infection may be transmitted from a donor and result in disseminated disease in the immunosuppressed host. Recent outbreaks of deceased donor-derived infections resulting in high rates of mortality and severe morbidity have emphasized the need to be cautious in using donors with possible meningoencephalitis. Screening of organ donors for potential transmissible infections is paramount to improving transplantation outcomes.

Donor derived Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection after solid-organ transplantation: A comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium tuberculosis may be transmitted via the allograft to cause a morbid and potentially fatal infection after solid organ transplantation (SOT). We reviewed all reported cases of donor-derived tuberculosis (DDTB) to provide an update on its epidemiology, clinical course, and outcome after SOT.

METHODS

MEDLINE, OVID, and EMBASE were reviewed from its inception until December 31, 2016 using key words donor-derived infection, tuberculosis and solid organ transplant or transplantation.

RESULTS

We retrieved 36 cases of proven (n = 17), probable (n = 8), and possible (n = 11) DDTB among 16 lung, 13 kidney, 6 liver, and 1 heart recipients. Most patients were male (21/35, 60%) with median age of 48 (range 23-68) years. Median time to clinical presentation or diagnosis was 2.7 months (range 0.2-29). The most common donor risk factor was residence in a TB-endemic area (13/28, 46.4%). Fever was the most frequent presenting symptom (20/36, 56.5%). Diagnosis of tuberculosis was mostly made via AFB smear or mycobacterial culture (30/36, 83.3%). Allograft involvement was expectedly common; there were almost equal proportions of pulmonary (36%), extra-pulmonary (28%) and disseminated (36%) cases. All cases of pulmonary TB were identified only among lung transplant recipients. The median duration of TB treatment was 10.5 (range 3-24) months. Graft loss occurred in four (4/22, 18.2%) patients. All-cause mortality was 25% (9/36); four of nine deaths were attributed to TB.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-derived TB presents early after SOT, most commonly as fever, and carries a high mortality risk. Donors should be screened, with particular attention to TB risk factors. Fever during the early post-operative period should prompt a thorough evaluation for DDTB in endemic regions and among patients with "at-risk" donors.

Fatal case of donor-derived colistin-resistant carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae transmission in cardiac transplantation

Herein we report a fatal case of donor-derived transmission of XDR-resistant carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) in cardiac transplantation. A 59-year-old male patient with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy underwent heart transplantation. On day 5 post-operation, blood cultures from the donor were positive for colistin-resistant carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (ColR KPC-Kp) susceptible only to amikacin. Recipient blood cultures were also positive for ColR KPC-Kp with the same sensitivity profile as the donor isolate with an identical PFGE pattern. The patient was treated with double-carbapenems and amikacin. The patient evolved to pericarditis, osteomyelitis, and pulmonary necrosis, all fragment cultures positive for the same agent. The patient developed septic shock, multiple organ failure and died on day 50 post-transplantation. Based on current microbiological scenario worldwide the possibility of transmitting multidrug resistant (MDR) organisms should be considered.

Prevalence of Chagas Disease among Solid Organ-Transplanted Patients in a Nonendemic Country

Reactivation of Chagas disease in the chronic phase may occur after solid organ transplantation, which may result in high parasitemia and severe clinical manifestations such as myocarditis and meningoencephalitis. The aim of the present study is to describe the prevalence of Chagas disease among solid organ-transplanted patients in a tertiary hospital from a nonendemic country. A cross-sectional study was performed at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (Barcelona, Spain) from April to September 2016. Chagas disease screening was performed through serological tests in adult patients coming from endemic areas that had received solid organ transplantation and were being controlled in our hospital during the study period. Overall, 42 patients were included, 20 (47.6%) were male and median age was 50.5 (23-73) years. Transplanted organs were as follows: 18 kidneys, 17 lungs, and 7 livers. Three patients had Chagas disease, corresponding to a prevalence among this group of solid organ-transplanted patients of 7.1%. All three patients were born in Bolivia, had been diagnosed with Chagas disease and received specific treatment before the organ transplantation. We highly recommend providing screening tests for Chagas disease in patients with or candidates for solid organ transplantation coming from endemic areas, early treatment with benznidazole, and close follow-up to prevent clinical reactivations.

Infections in liver and lung transplant recipients: a national prospective cohort

Infections are a major complication of solid organ transplants (SOTs). This study aimed to describe recipients' characteristics, and the frequency and etiology of infections and transplant outcome in liver and lung SOTs, and to investigate exposures associated to infection and death in liver transplant recipients. The study population included recipients of SOTs performed in Italy during a 1-year period in ten Italian lung transplant units and eight liver transplant units. Data on comorbidities, infections, retransplantation, and death were prospectively collected using a web-based system, with a 6-month follow-up. The cumulative incidence of infection was 31.7% and 47.8% in liver and lung transplants, respectively, with most infections occurring within the first month after transplantation. Gram-negatives, which were primarily multidrug-resistant, were the most frequent cause of infection. Death rates were 0.42 per 1000 recipient-days in liver transplants and 1.41 per 1000 recipient-days in lung transplants. Infection after SOT in adult liver recipients is associated to an increased risk of death (OR = 13.25; p-value < 0.001). Given the frequency of infection caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms in SOT recipients in Italy and the heavy impact of infections on the transplant outcome, the reinforcement of surveillance and control activities to prevent the transmission of multidrug-resistant microorganisms in SOT recipients represents a priority. The implementation of the study protocol in liver and lung transplant units and the sharing of results have increased the awareness about the threat due to antimicrobial resistance in the country.

Tick-borne illness after transplantation: Case and review

Tick-borne infections in solid organ transplant recipients are an infrequent and difficult diagnostic challenge owing to multiple routes of acquisition and unusual presentations. A 67-year-old male recipient of a combined liver and kidney transplant presented with recurrent fevers following surgery. Standard microbiologic workup was non-diagnostic. Shortness of breath, confusion, lethargy, and hypotension developed along with progressive anemia, requiring multiple blood transfusions. Workup suggested hemolysis and review of the peripheral smear was diagnostic for Babesia microti infection. Tick transmission, transmission via blood products, and/or the transplanted organ were all considered. More extensive questioning revealed a history of intermittent fevers for several months before transplantation. Testing of pre-transplant blood was positive for B. microti antibodies, suggesting infection prior to transplantation. The delayed diagnosis of babesiosis in this patient highlights the need for a detailed exposure history prior to transplantation, as well as considering the potential for atypical presentations of tick-borne infections in immune suppressed solid organ recipients. Furthermore, this case illustrates the importance of early Infectious Disease consultation to meet the challenges exhibited by febrile transplant patients. Infectious Diseases physicians are trained to consider, diagnose, and treat tick-borne infections, contributing to improved clinical outcome.