Discrete and continuous prepulses have differential effects on startle prepulse inhibition and skin conductance orienting

Objective Detection of Tinnitus Based on Electrophysiology

Tinnitus, a common disease in the clinic, is associated with persistent pain and high costs to society. Several aspects of tinnitus, such as the pathophysiology mechanism, effective treatment, objective detection, etc., have not been elucidated. Any change in the auditory pathway can lead to tinnitus. At present, there is no clear and unified mechanism to explain tinnitus, and the hypotheses regarding its mechanism include auditory plasticity theory, cortical reorganization theory, dorsal cochlear nucleus hypothesis, etc. Current theories on the mechanism of tinnitus mainly focus on the abnormal activity of the central nervous system. Unfortunately, there is currently a lack of objective diagnostic methods for tinnitus. Developing a method that can detect tinnitus objectively is crucial, only in this way can we identify whether the patient really suffers from tinnitus in the case of cognitive impairment or medical disputes and the therapeutic effect of tinnitus. Electrophysiological investigations have prompted the development of an objective detection of tinnitus by potentials recorded in the auditory pathway. However, there is no objective indicator with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to diagnose tinnitus at present. Based on recent findings of studies with various methods, possible electrophysiological approaches to detect the presence of tinnitus have been summarized. We analyze the change of neural activity throughout the auditory pathway in tinnitus subjects and in patients with tinnitus of varying severity to find available parameters in these methods, which is helpful to further explore the feasibility of using electrophysiological methods for the objective detection of tinnitus.

Neural mapping of prepulse-induced startle reflex modulation as indices of sensory information processing in healthy and clinical populations: A systematic review

Startle reflex is modulated when a weaker sensory stimulus ("prepulse") precedes a startling stimulus ("pulse"). Prepulse Inhibition (PPI) is the attenuation of the startle reflex (prepulse precedes pulse by 30-500 ms), whereas Prepulse Facilitation (PPF) is the enhancement of the startle reflex (prepulse precedes pulse by 500-6000 ms). Here, we critically appraise human studies using functional neuroimaging to establish brain regions associated with PPI and PPF. Of 10 studies, nine studies revealed thalamic, striatal and frontal lobe activation during PPI in healthy groups, and activation deficits in the cortico-striato-pallido-thalamic circuitry in schizophrenia (three studies) and Tourette Syndrome (two studies). One study revealed a shared network for PPI and PPF in frontal regions and cerebellum, with PPF networks recruiting superior medial gyrus and cingulate cortex. The main gaps in the literature are (i) limited PPF research and whether PPI and PPF operate on separate/shared networks, (ii) no data on sex differences in neural underpinnings of PPI and PPF, and (iii) no data on neural underpinnings of PPI and PPF in other clinical disorders.

Prepulse inhibition in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is a measure of sensorimotor gating used to identify deficits in early-stage information processing and inhibitory function defects. Many studies support the presence of PPI deficits in schizophrenia patients. However, very few studies have explored PPI levels among first-degree relatives (FDR) of schizophrenia patients, and the results have been inconsistent. This review article explored PPI levels in FDR of schizophrenia patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review using the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, EBSCO and Chinese databases from inception to January 2020. A series of related factors (eg, PPI paradigm, heritability and sample characteristics) and outcomes were summarized from the literature that met the inclusion criteria. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies were eligible for systematic review after screening. A meta-analysis of the selected studies was not conducted due to the limitations of quantity and paradigm heterogeneity. A majority of the studies' subjects were siblings of schizophrenia patients and different paradigms were applied. Most of the included studies reported no difference in PPI values between FDR of schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to traditional certainty that unaffected FDR of schizophrenia patients have PPI defects, our review found no sufficient evidence supporting that the PPI level in FDR of schizophrenia patients was lower than in healthy controls. A prospective cohort study focusing on different outcomes such as developing schizophrenia is required to explore PPI levels in FDR of schizophrenia patients.

Effects of prepulse format and lead interval on the assessment of automatic and attention-modulated prepulse inhibition

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response can index automatic and attention-modulated aspects of sensorimotor gating. Automatic sensorimotor gating is typically assessed by a no-task PPI protocol in which participants are presented with discrete white noise prepulse and startle stimuli over continuous background broadband noise at brief short-lead intervals (e.g., 60-120 ms). In contrast, attention-modulated sensorimotor gating is typically assessed through a task-based PPI protocol using continuous format pure tone prepulses and white noise startle stimuli presented over an ambient background at a lead interval of 120 ms. The present study sought to test the extent that the assessment of attention-modulated PPI is dependent on prepulse type and lead interval across two experiments. Experiment 1 assessed attention effects on PPI produced by discrete prepulses at lead intervals of 60 and 120 ms. Experiment 2 examined attention effects on PPI with matched stimulus conditions apart from continuous prepulses. Results indicated that the use of discrete prepulses failed to elicit attentional-modulation of PPI and that assessment therein was dependent on the use of continuous prepulses at a lead interval of 120 ms. These results highlight additional methods to concurrently assess automatic and attention-modulated PPI in a single testing session using a task-based tone counting task.

Lower prepulse inhibition in clinical high-risk groups but not in familial risk groups for psychosis compared with healthy controls

AIM

Although the lower level of prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response is well known in schizophrenia, the onset of this difference is not clear. The aim of the present study was to compare PPI in individuals with clinical and familial high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls.

METHODS

We studied PPI in individuals within three groups: ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR, n = 29), familial high risk for psychosis (FHR, n = 24) and healthy controls (HC, n = 28). The FHR group was chosen among siblings of patients with schizophrenia, whereas UHR was defined based on the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). We collected clinical data using the BPRS-E, SANS and SAPS when individuals with UHR were antipsychotic-naïve. A cognitive battery that assessed attention, cognitive flexibility, working memory, verbal learning and memory domains was applied to all participants.

RESULTS

PPI was lower in the UHR group compared with both the FHR and HC groups. Those with a positive family history for schizophrenia had lower PPI than others in the UHR group. There was no difference in PPI between the FHR and HC groups. We found no relationship between PPI and cognitive performance in the three groups. Startle reactivity was not different among the three groups. Positive and negative symptoms were not related to PPI and startle reactivity in the UHR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that clinical and familial high-risk groups for psychosis have different patterns of PPI.

The effects of multiphasic prepulses on automatic and attention-modulated prepulse inhibition

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is widely viewed as an operational measure of sensorimotor gating. Previous research has shown that sensorimotor gating can occur automatically and also can be influenced by selective attention. The present research investigated the relationship of the transient detection response (TDR) with automatic and attention-modulated PPI using a novel "multiphasic" prepulse stimulus. Experiment 1 compared discrete versus multiphasic prepulse types in a no-task PPI protocol to validate multiphasic prepulses as effective elicitors of automatic sensorimotor gating. Results revealed that the two prepulse types elicited equivalent levels of PPI. Experiment 2 compared the effectiveness of continuous monophasic versus continuous multiphasic prepulses within a task-based PPI protocol using a lead interval of 120 ms. Results revealed a significant attention effect for monophasic prepulses only. However, robust PPI was produced by the multiphasic prepulses independent of attention as well as over time. These results suggest that multiple influences on PPI can be assessed concurrently depending on prepulse parameters designed to activate the TDR when used in a PPI protocol capable of assessing the effects of selective attention on prepulse processing [corrected]

The gap-startle paradigm to assess auditory temporal processing: Bridging animal and human research

The gap-prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle (GPIAS) paradigm is the primary test used in animal research to identify gap detection thresholds and impairment. When a silent gap is presented shortly before a loud startling stimulus, the startle reflex is inhibited and the extent of inhibition is assumed to reflect detection. Here, we applied the same paradigm in humans. One hundred and fifty-seven normal-hearing participants were tested using one of five gap durations (5, 25, 50, 100, 200 ms) in one of the following two paradigms-gap-embedded in or gap-following-the continuous background noise. The duration-inhibition relationship was observable for both conditions but followed different patterns. In the gap-embedded paradigm, GPIAS increased significantly with gap duration up to 50 ms and then more slowly up to 200 ms (trend only). In contrast, in the gap-following paradigm, significant inhibition-different from 0--was observable only at gap durations from 50 to 200 ms. The finding that different patterns are found depending on gap position within the background noise is compatible with distinct mechanisms underlying each of the two paradigms.

Moderate-level prenatal alcohol exposure enhances acoustic startle magnitude and disrupts prepulse inhibition in adult rhesus monkeys

BACKGROUND

Prenatal alcohol exposure can contribute to a wide range of neurodevelopmental impairments in children and adults including behavioral and neuropsychiatric disorders. In rhesus monkeys, we examined whether moderate-level prenatal alcohol exposure would alter acoustic startle responses and prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle. PPI is a highly quantifiable measure of inhibitory neural processes or sensorimotor gating associated with neuropsychiatric disorders.

METHODS

Acoustic startle and PPI of the acoustic startle were tested in 37 adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) from 4 experimental conditions: (i) moderate-level prenatal alcohol-exposed, (ii) prenatally stressed, (iii) moderate-level prenatal alcohol-exposed + prenatally stressed, and (iv) sucrose controls.

RESULTS

Prenatal alcohol-exposed monkeys showed a higher magnitude of acoustic startle response and disrupted PPI compared with monkeys not exposed to alcohol prenatally. Monkeys in all conditions showed higher hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis responses after undergoing the startle procedure, but HPA responses were unrelated to startle response magnitude, latency, or PPI.

CONCLUSIONS

Finding altered PPI in monkeys prenatally exposed to a moderate dose of alcohol suggests that reduced sensorimotor gating is 1 effect of prenatal alcohol exposure. Because reduced sensorimotor gating is observed in many neuropsychiatric disorders, sensorimotor gating deficits could be an aspect of the comorbidity between fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and mental health conditions.

Effects of olanzapine, risperidone and haloperidol on prepulse inhibition in schizophrenia patients: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Prepulse inhibition (PPI), whereby the startle eyeblink response is inhibited by a relatively weak non-startling stimulus preceding the powerful startle eliciting stimulus, is a measure of sensorimotor gating and has been shown to be deficient in schizophrenia patients. There is considerable interest in whether conventional and/or atypical antipsychotic medications can "normalize" PPI deficits in schizophrenia patients. 51 schizophrenia patients participated in a randomized, double-blind controlled trial on the effects of three commonly-prescribed antipsychotic medications (risperidone, olanzapine, or haloperidol) on PPI, startle habituation, and startle reactivity. Patients were tested at baseline, Week 4 and Week 8. Mixed model regression analyses revealed that olanzapine significantly improved PPI from Week 4 to Week 8, and that at Week 8 patients receiving olanzapine produced significantly greater PPI than those receiving risperidone, but not haloperidol. There were no effects of medication on startle habituation or startle reactivity. These results support the conclusion that olanzapine effectively increased PPI in schizophrenia patients, but that risperidone and haloperidol had no such effects. The results are discussed in terms of animal models, neural substrates, and treatment implications.

Effects of prepulse intensity, duration, and bandwidth on perceived intensity of startling acoustic stimuli

Intense abrupt stimuli can elicit a startle reflex; a weak "prepulse" 30-300 ms earlier can reduce both startle and perceived stimulus intensity. Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle, an operational measure of sensorimotor gating, is used to understand brain disorders characterized by gating deficits. Compared to startle, PPI of perceived stimulus intensity (PPIPSI) may provide information that is distinct, and easier to acquire and analyze. To develop this experimental measure, we examined PPIPSI under different stimulus conditions. Both PPI and PPIPSI exhibited a non-linear relationship to prepulse intensity, with prepulses 15 dB(A) above background causing maximal inhibition of both measures. A 50 ms broadband noise prepulse produced maximal PPI and PPIPSI, whereas 5 and 20 ms pure tone prepulses produced maximal PPIPSI and PPI, respectively. PPIPSI is a robust, parametrically sensitive and "low tech" measure of sensory gating that may become a valuable tool for understanding the biology of certain mental disorders.

Background noise decreases both prepulse elicitation and inhibition of acoustic startle blink responding

Prepulse inhibition of startle (PPI) has proved to be useful in distinguishing between schizophrenia patients and normal controls, although not all studies in this area find such group differences. One reason for this inconsistency may be the fact that some research labs present the startle eliciting and inhibiting stimuli over a steady background noise (70 dB), whereas others present stimuli in ambient noise conditions (30-56 dB). The present study tested the impact of background noise (30, 50, and 70 dB) on PPI in normal college adults, with prepulses at intensities of 75, 80, and 85 dB, and with prepulse rise times of 1 or 10 ms. Background noise decreased the amount of PPI caused by the prepulses, and also decreased the ability of the prepulses to themselves elicit blink responses. We conclude that background noise interferes with the processing of the prepulse, attenuating its effect as both an elicitor and inhibitor of the startle reflex. By elevating the difficulty of prepulse processing, this attenuation may be a necessary condition for observing differences in PPI between patient and control groups.

Effects of background and prepulse characteristics on prepulse inhibition and facilitation: implications for neuropsychiatric research

BACKGROUND

Both prepulse inhibition (PPI) and prepulse facilitation (PPF) deficits have been reported in schizophrenia patients, but the use of different experimental parameters across laboratories makes direct comparisons of results difficult. We assessed the effects of different parameters on PPI and PPF in normal subjects.

METHODS

Eyeblink startle was measured in 14 healthy male subjects, using 115 dB[A] white noise startle pulses and 86 dB[A] prepulses. Analyses compared the effects of: 1) background noise level (ambient 54 vs. 70 dB[A]) on PPI and PPF, 2) prepulse duration (discrete 20 msec vs. continuous) on PPF, 3) prepulse frequency (1000 Hz vs. white noise) on PPI and PPF, and 4) prepulse interval (2000 vs. 4500 msec) on PPF.

RESULTS

Compared to an experimentally delivered 70 dB[A] background, ambient 54 dB[A] background led to significantly more PPI (with discrete white noise prepulses), and more PPF (with continuous prepulses). Continuous and longer (4500 msec) prepulses induced more PPF than did discrete and shorter (2000 msec) prepulses.

CONCLUSIONS

Paradigmatic differences appear likely to be responsible for divergent findings in studies of PPI and PPF in normal and schizophrenia subjects. The present study should guide investigators in the selection of parameters for assessing PPI and PPF in studies of normal subjects and schizophrenia patients. Attention to the 4 factors of 1) background noise, 2) prepulse duration, 3) frequency, and 4) interval will facilitate comparability of results across different laboratories, especially when using PPI/PPF in schizophrenia research as neural substrate probes, as biomarkers, and as endophenotypes.

The functional relationship between visual backward masking and prepulse inhibition

This experiment demonstrated a relationship between prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle eyeblink and visual backward masking in college students. It was hypothesized that recovery from backward masking effects is due in part to sensory gating, as assessed by auditory and visual PPI. Visual presentations of letters served as targets or visual prepulses in an intermixed session of backward masking and PPI. Backward masking and PPI (both auditory and visual) were assessed at stimulus onset asynchronies of 30, 45, 60, 120, and 150 ms. A repeated-measures regression revealed that there was a relationship between backward masking and PPI for both visual and auditory PPI, with higher levels of PPI being associated with greater recovery from backward masking. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that recovery from backward masking effects is affected by sensory gating acting in part to gate out the interruptive effects of the mask.

Similar effects of attention directed to acoustic and tactile stimuli on prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is assumed to index automatic and controlled processing. In three experiments (n= 32, 22, and 30) participants were asked to judge the duration of a prepulse in comparison with a stimulus presented 4000 ms before the prepulse. A distracter was presented simultaneously with the prepulse to increase the cognitive demands of the task. PPI was assessed at stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 30-150 ms, and 420 ms. The prepulse was either a tone (60 dB) or a tactile stimulus (21 kPa), and startle was elicited by 95 dB white noise. Directing attention to the prepulse increased PPI at SOAs of 60 ms and longer in all experiments, but the sensory modality to which attention was directed played only a minor role. We conclude that directing attention to both acoustic and tactile prepulses increased PPI.

Impact of prepulse characteristics on the detection of sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia patients have prominent deficits in information processing that can be detected by measures of prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response. Deficient PPI in schizophrenia is thought to reflect a failure of brain-based information 'protective' mechanisms that normally inhibit responsivity for 30-500ms after a weak prepulse stimulus. The relationship between specific prepulse stimulus characteristics and PPI deficits in this study was examined in 31 schizophrenia patients and 34 normal comparison subjects. Schizophrenia patients had overall deficits in PPI across four conditions where the prepulse was either discrete (abrupt) or continuous (sustained) and consisted of either white noise or a pure tone. On inspection and analysis of the data, it appears that the white noise conditions, rather than tone conditions, account for the group differences. Thus, the discrete white noise prepulse was most effective in eliciting PPI deficits, resulting in a large effect size between groups (d=0.85; P<0.01). Deficits in information-protective mechanisms in schizophrenia may be differentially sensitive to specific stimulus characteristics; this observation may be relevant both to the neurobiology of information processing deficits in schizophrenia and to the methodologies for studying these deficits experimentally.