1
|
Takele WW, Vesco KK, Josefson J, Redman LM, Hannah W, Bonham MP, Chen M, Chivers SC, Fawcett AJ, Grieger JA, Habibi N, Leung GKW, Liu K, Mekonnen EG, Pathirana M, Quinteros A, Taylor R, Ukke GG, Zhou SJ, Lim S. Effective interventions in preventing gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2024; 4:75. [PMID: 38643248 PMCID: PMC11032369 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00491-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lifestyle choices, metformin, and dietary supplements may prevent GDM, but the effect of intervention characteristics has not been identified. This review evaluated intervention characteristics to inform the implementation of GDM prevention interventions. METHODS Ovid, MEDLINE/PubMed, and EMBASE databases were searched. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) framework was used to examine intervention characteristics (who, what, when, where, and how). Subgroup analysis was performed by intervention characteristics. RESULTS 116 studies involving 40,940 participants are included. Group-based physical activity interventions (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.46, 0.95) reduce the incidence of GDM compared with individual or mixed (individual and group) delivery format (subgroup p-value = 0.04). Physical activity interventions delivered at healthcare facilities reduce the risk of GDM (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.49, 0.72) compared with home-based interventions (subgroup p-value = 0.03). No other intervention characteristics impact the effectiveness of all other interventions. CONCLUSIONS Dietary, physical activity, diet plus physical activity, metformin, and myoinositol interventions reduce the incidence of GDM compared with control interventions. Group and healthcare facility-based physical activity interventions show better effectiveness in preventing GDM than individual and community-based interventions. Other intervention characteristics (e.g. utilization of e-health) don't impact the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions, and thus, interventions may require consideration of the local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wubet Worku Takele
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kimberly K Vesco
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Oakland, USA
| | - Jami Josefson
- Northwestern University/ Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Wesley Hannah
- Madras Diabetes Research Foundation Chennai, Chennai, India
- Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maxine P Bonham
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mingling Chen
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Sian C Chivers
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea J Fawcett
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Clinical & Organizational Development, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jessica A Grieger
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Nahal Habibi
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Gloria K W Leung
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kai Liu
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Maleesa Pathirana
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alejandra Quinteros
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Rachael Taylor
- School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Gebresilasea G Ukke
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shao J Zhou
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Siew Lim
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Campbell HE, Chappell LC, McManus RJ, Tucker KL, Crawford C, Green M, Rivero-Arias O. Detection and Control of Pregnancy Hypertension Using Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure With Automated Telemonitoring: Cost Analyses of the BUMP Randomized Trials. Hypertension 2024; 81:887-896. [PMID: 38258566 PMCID: PMC10956677 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.123.22059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnancy hypertension continues to cause maternal and perinatal morbidity. Two linked UK randomized trials showed adding self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) with automated telemonitoring to usual antenatal care did not result in earlier detection or better control of pregnancy hypertension. This article reports the trials' integrated cost analyses. METHODS Two cost analyses. SMBP with usual care was compared with usual care alone in pregnant individuals at risk of hypertension (BUMP 1 trial [Blood Pressure Monitoring in High Risk Pregnancy to Improve the Detection and Monitoring of Hypertension], n=2441) and with hypertension (BUMP 2 trial, n=850). Clinical notes review identified participant-level antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care and these were costed. Comparisons between trial arms used means and 95% CIs. Within BUMP 2, chronic and gestational hypertension cohorts were analyzed separately. Telemonitoring system costs were reported separately. RESULTS In BUMP 1, mean (SE) total costs with SMBP and with usual care were £7200 (£323) and £7063 (£245), respectively, mean difference (95% CI), £151 (-£633 to £936). For the BUMP 2 chronic hypertension cohort, corresponding figures were £13 384 (£1230), £12 614 (£1081), mean difference £323 (-£2904 to £3549) and for the gestational hypertension cohort were £11 456 (£901), £11 145 (£959), mean difference £41 (-£2486 to £2567). The per-person cost of telemonitoring was £6 in BUMP 1 and £29 in BUMP 2. CONCLUSIONS SMBP was not associated with changes in the cost of health care contacts for individuals at risk of, or with, pregnancy hypertension. This is reassuring as SMBP in pregnancy is widely prevalent, particularly because of the COVID-19 pandemic. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03334149.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen E. Campbell
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health (H.E.C., O.R.-A.)
| | - Lucy C. Chappell
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, United Kingdom (L.C.C.)
| | - Richard J. McManus
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences. University of Oxford, United Kingdom (R.J.M., K.L.T., C.C.)
| | - Katherine L. Tucker
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences. University of Oxford, United Kingdom (R.J.M., K.L.T., C.C.)
| | - Carole Crawford
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences. University of Oxford, United Kingdom (R.J.M., K.L.T., C.C.)
| | - Marcus Green
- Action on Pre-eclampsia, Evesham, United Kingdom (M.G.)
| | - Oliver Rivero-Arias
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health (H.E.C., O.R.-A.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heazell AE, Wilkinson J, Morris RK, Simpson N, Smith LK, Stacey T, Storey C, Higgins L. Mothers working to prevent early stillbirth study (MiNESS 20-28): a case-control study protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082835. [PMID: 38238057 PMCID: PMC11148669 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the UK, 1600 babies die every year before, during or immediately after birth at 20-28 weeks' gestation. This bereavement has a similar impact on parental physical and psychological well-being to late stillbirth (>28 weeks' gestation). Improved understanding of potentially modifiable risk factors for late stillbirth (including supine going-to-sleep position) has influenced international clinical practice. Information is now urgently required to similarly inform clinical practice and aid decision-making by expectant mothers/parents, addressing inequalities in pregnancy loss between 20 and 28 weeks. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study focuses on what portion of risk of pregnancy loss 20-28 weeks' gestation is associated with exposures amenable to public health campaigns/antenatal care adaptation. A case-control study of non-anomalous singleton baby loss (via miscarriage, stillbirth or early neonatal death) 20+0 to 27+6 (n=316) and randomly selected control pregnancies (2:1 ratio; n=632) at group-matched gestations will be conducted. Data is collected via participant recall (researcher-administered questionnaire) and extraction from contemporaneous medical records. Unadjusted/confounder-adjusted ORs will be calculated. Exposures associated with early stillbirth at OR≥1.5 will be detectable (p<0.05, β>0.80) assuming exposure prevalence of 30%-60%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION NHS research ethical approval has been obtained from the London-Seasonal research ethics committee (23/LO/0622). The results will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed open-access journals. Information from this study will enable development of antenatal care and education for healthcare professionals and pregnant people to reduce risk of early stillbirth. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT06005272.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Edward Heazell
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Jack Wilkinson
- Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - R Katie Morris
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nigel Simpson
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lucy K Smith
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Tomasina Stacey
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Lucy Higgins
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nzelu D, Palmer T, Stott D, Pandya P, Napolitano R, Casagrandi D, Ammari C, Hillman S. First trimester screening for pre-eclampsia and targeted aspirin prophylaxis: a cost-effectiveness cohort study. BJOG 2024; 131:222-230. [PMID: 37431533 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigate cost-effectiveness of first trimester pre-eclampsia screening using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm and targeted aspirin prophylaxis in comparison with standard care. DESIGN Retrospective observational study. SETTING London tertiary hospital. POPULATION 5957 pregnancies screened for pre-eclampsia using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) method. METHODS Differences in pregnancy outcomes between those who developed pre-eclampsia, term pre-eclampsia and preterm pre-eclampsia were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests. The FMF algorithm was applied retrospectively to the cohort. A decision analytic model was used to estimate costs and outcomes for pregnancies screened using NICE and those screened using the FMF algorithm. The decision point probabilities were calculated using the included cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incremental healthcare costs and QALY gained per pregnancy screened. RESULTS Of 5957 pregnancies, 12.8% and 15.9% were screen-positive for development of pre-eclampsia using the NICE and FMF methods, respectively. Of those who were screen-positive by NICE recommendations, aspirin was not prescribed in 25%. Across the three groups, namely, pregnancies without pre-eclampsia, term pre-eclampsia and preterm pre-eclampsia there was a statistically significant trend in rates of emergency caesarean (respectively 21%, 43% and 71.4%; P < 0.001), admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (5.9%, 9.4%, 41%; P < 0.001) and length of stay in NICU. The FMF algorithm was associated with seven fewer cases of preterm pre-eclampsia, cost saving of £9.06 and QALY gain of 0.00006/pregnancy screened. CONCLUSIONS Using a conservative approach, application of the FMF algorithm achieved clinical benefit and an economic cost saving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Nzelu
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
| | - Tom Palmer
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Stott
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
| | - Pranav Pandya
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
| | - Raffaele Napolitano
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
- University College London, London, UK
| | - Davide Casagrandi
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
| | - Christina Ammari
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
| | - Sara Hillman
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
- University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bakhbakhi D, Siassakos D, Davies A, Merriel A, Barnard K, Stead E, Shakespeare C, Duffy JMN, Hinton L, McDowell K, Lyons A, Fraser A, Burden C. Interventions, outcomes and outcome measurement instruments in stillbirth care research: A systematic review to inform the development of a core outcome set. BJOG 2023; 130:560-576. [PMID: 36655361 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A core outcome set could address inconsistent outcome reporting and improve evidence for stillbirth care research, which have been identified as an important research priority. OBJECTIVES To identify outcomes and outcome measurement instruments reported by studies evaluating interventions after the diagnosis of a stillbirth. SEARCH STRATEGY Amed, BNI, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and WHO ICTRP from 1998 to August 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised and non-randomised comparative or non-comparative studies reporting a stillbirth care intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Interventions, outcomes reported, definitions and outcome measurement tools were extracted. MAIN RESULTS Forty randomised and 200 non-randomised studies were included. Fifty-eight different interventions were reported, labour and birth care (52 studies), hospital bereavement care (28 studies), clinical investigations (116 studies), care in a multiple pregnancy (2 studies), psychosocial support (28 studies) and care in a subsequent pregnancy (14 studies). A total of 391 unique outcomes were reported and organised into 14 outcome domains: labour and birth; postpartum; delivery of care; investigations; multiple pregnancy; mental health; emotional functioning; grief and bereavement; social functioning; relationship; whole person; subsequent pregnancy; subsequent children and siblings and economic. A total of 242 outcome measurement instruments were used, with 0-22 tools per outcome. CONCLUSIONS Heterogeneity in outcome reporting, outcome definition and measurement tools in care after stillbirth exists. Considerable research gaps on specific intervention types in stillbirth care were identified. A core outcome set is needed to standardise outcome collection and reporting for stillbirth care research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anna Davies
- Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Emma Stead
- Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Lisa Hinton
- THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Anna Lyons
- Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Veettil SK, Kategeaw W, Hejazi A, Workalemahu T, Rothwell E, Silver RM, Chaiyakunapruk N. The economic burden associated with stillbirth: A systematic review. Birth 2023; 50:300-309. [PMID: 36774590 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence on the economic burden of stillbirth is limited. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify studies focusing on the economic burden of stillbirth, describe the methods used, and summarize the findings. METHOD We performed a systematic search in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and EconLit from inception to July 2021. Original studies reporting the cost of illness, economic burden, or health care expenditures related to stillbirth were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated study quality using the Larg and Moss checklist. A narrative synthesis was performed. Costs were presented in US dollars (US$) in 2020. RESULTS From the 602 records identified, a total of four studies were included. Eligible studies were from high-income countries. Only one study estimated both direct and indirect costs. Among three cost-of-illness studies, two studies undertook a prevalence-based approach. The quality of these studies varied and was substantially under-reported. Four studies describing direct costs ranged from $6934 to $9220 per stillbirth. Indirect costs account for around 97% of overall costs. No studies have incorporated intangible cost components. CONCLUSIONS The economic burden of stillbirth has been underestimated and not extensively studied. There are no data on the cost of stillbirth from countries that bear a higher burden of stillbirth. Extensive variation in methodologies and cost components was observed in the studies reviewed. Future research should incorporate all costs, including intangible costs, to provide a comprehensive picture of the true economic impact of stillbirth on society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sajesh K Veettil
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Warittakorn Kategeaw
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Andre Hejazi
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Erin Rothwell
- University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Robert M Silver
- University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,IDEAS Center, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Relph S, Vieira MC, Copas A, Coxon K, Alagna A, Briley A, Johnson M, Page L, Peebles D, Shennan A, Thilaganathan B, Marlow N, Lees C, Lawlor DA, Khalil A, Sandall J, Pasupathy D, Healey A. Improving antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age fetus: economic evaluation of Growth Assessment Protocol. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2022; 60:620-631. [PMID: 35797108 PMCID: PMC9828078 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP), as implemented in the DESiGN trial, is cost-effective in terms of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate, when compared with standard care. METHODS This was an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis undertaken from the perspective of a UK National Health Service hospital provider. Thirteen maternity units from England, UK, were recruited to the DESiGN (DEtection of Small for GestatioNal age fetus) trial, a cluster randomized controlled trial. Singleton, non-anomalous pregnancies which delivered after 24 + 0 gestational weeks between November 2015 and February 2019 were analyzed. Probabilistic decision modeling using clinical trial data was undertaken. The main outcomes of the study were the expected incremental cost, the additional number of SGA neonates identified antenatally and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (cost per additional SGA neonate identified) of implementing GAP. Secondary analysis focused on the ICER per infant quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS The expected incremental cost (including hospital care and implementation costs) of GAP over standard care was £34 559 per 1000 births, with a 68% probability that implementation of GAP would be associated with increased costs to sustain program delivery. GAP identified an additional 1.77 SGA neonates per 1000 births (55% probability of it being more clinically effective). The ICER for GAP was £19 525 per additional SGA neonate identified, with a 44% probability that GAP would both increase cost and identify more SGA neonates compared with standard care. The probability of GAP being the dominant clinical strategy was low (11%). The expected incremental cost per infant QALY gained ranged from £68 242 to £545 940, depending on assumptions regarding the QALY value of detection of SGA. CONCLUSION The economic case for replacing standard care with GAP is weak based on the analysis reported in our study. However, this conclusion should be viewed taking into account that cost-effectiveness analyses are always limited by the assumptions made. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Relph
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - M. C. Vieira
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical SciencesSão PauloBrazil
| | - A. Copas
- Centre for Pragmatic Global Health TrialsInstitute for Global Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - K. Coxon
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and EducationKingston and St George's UniversityLondonUK
| | - A. Alagna
- The Guy's & St Thomas' CharityLondonUK
| | - A. Briley
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Caring Futures InstituteCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
| | - M. Johnson
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - L. Page
- West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - D. Peebles
- UCL Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - A. Shennan
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - B. Thilaganathan
- Fetal Medicine UnitSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Molecular & Clinical Sciences Research InstituteSt George's, University of LondonLondonUK
| | - N. Marlow
- UCL Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - C. Lees
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - D. A. Lawlor
- Population Health ScienceBristol Medical School, University of BristolBristolUK
- Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research CentreBristolUK
| | - A. Khalil
- Fetal Medicine UnitSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Molecular & Clinical Sciences Research InstituteSt George's, University of LondonLondonUK
| | - J. Sandall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - D. Pasupathy
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - A. Healey
- Department of Health Service and Population ResearchDavid Goldberg Centre, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schoonover KL, Yadav H, Prokop L, Lapid MI. Accommodating Bereaved Parents in the Workplace: A Scoping Review. JOURNAL OF LOSS & TRAUMA 2022; 28:348-363. [PMID: 37635848 PMCID: PMC10456992 DOI: 10.1080/15325024.2022.2122221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Helpful workplace support strategies and accommodations (WSSA) for bereaved parents returning to work was assessed via comprehensive search of databases from 1990-1/21/22. 11 of 45 qualitative articles met inclusion. Bereaved parents often felt returning to work provided a coping strategy for and/or distraction from grief; however, some received insensitive comments by employer/coworkers. Helpful WSSA included flexibility on date to return to work and schedule. In conclusion, due to the intensity of their grief, bereaved parents benefit from a workplace offering individualized time off for bereavement & workplace accommodations to address potential difficulty meeting prior productivity demands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hemang Yadav
- Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Larry Prokop
- Department of Education, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Maria I Lapid
- Center for Palliative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic Hospice, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cuckle H, Heinonen S, Anttonen AK, Stefanovic V. Cost of providing cell-free DNA screening for Down syndrome in Finland using different strategies. J Perinat Med 2022; 50:233-243. [PMID: 34860478 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A financial analysis is carried out to assess costs and benefits of providing cell-free DNA screening in Finland, using different strategies. METHODS Three cell-free DNA screening strategies are considered: Primary, all women; Secondary, those with positive Combined test; and Contingent, the 10-30% with the highest Combined test risks. Three costs are estimated: additional cost for 10,000 pregnancies compared with the Combined test; 'marginal' cost of avoiding a Down syndrome birth which occurs in a pregnancy that would have been false-negative using the Combined test; and marginal cost of preventing the iatrogenic loss of a non-Down syndrome birth which occurs in a pregnancy that would have been false-positive. RESULTS Primary cell-free DNA will require additional funds of €250,000. The marginal cost per Down syndrome birth avoided is considerably less than the lifetime medical and indirect cost; the marginal cost per unaffected iatrogenic fetal loss prevented is higher than one benefit measure but lower than another. If the ultrasound component of the Combined test is retained, as would be in Finland, the additional funds required rise to €992,000. Secondary cell-free DNA is cost-saving as is a Contingent strategy with 10% selected but whilst when 20-30% costs rise they are much less than for the Primary strategy and are cost-beneficial. CONCLUSIONS When considering the place of cell-free DNA screening it is important to make explicit the additional and marginal costs of different screening strategies and the associated benefits. Under most assumptions the balance is favorable for Contingent screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Cuckle
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Seppo Heinonen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetomaternal Medical Centre, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna-Kaisa Anttonen
- HUSLAB Laboratory of Genetics and Department of Clinical Genetics, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Vedran Stefanovic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetomaternal Medical Centre, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Camacho EM, Whyte S, Stock SJ, Weir CJ, Norman JE, Heazell AEP. Awareness of fetal movements and care package to reduce fetal mortality (AFFIRM): a trial-based and model-based cost-effectiveness analysis from a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:235. [PMID: 35317772 PMCID: PMC8941740 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04563-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The AFFIRM intervention aimed to reduce stillbirth and neonatal deaths by increasing awareness of reduced fetal movements (RFM) and implementing a care pathway when women present with RFM. Although there is uncertainty regarding the clinical effectiveness of the intervention, the aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness. Methods A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial was conducted in thirty-three hospitals in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland. All women giving birth at the study sites during the analysis period were included in the study. The costs associated with implementing the intervention were estimated from audits of RFM attendances and electronic healthcare records. Trial data were used to estimate a cost per stillbirth prevented was for AFFIRM versus standard care. A decision analytic model was used to estimate the costs and number of perinatal deaths (stillbirths + early neonatal deaths) prevented if AFFIRM were rolled out across Great Britain for one year. Key assumptions were explored in sensitivity analyses. Results Direct costs to implement AFFIRM were an estimated £95,126 per 1,000 births. Compared to standard care, the cost per stillbirth prevented was estimated to be between £86,478 and being dominated (higher costs, no benefit). The estimated healthcare budget impact of implementing AFFIRM across Great Britain was a cost increase of £61,851,400/year. Conclusions Perinatal deaths are relatively rare events in the UK which can increase uncertainty in economic evaluations. This evaluation estimated a plausible range of costs to prevent baby deaths which can inform policy decisions in maternity services. Trial registration The trial was registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01777022. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04563-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Camacho
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Sonia Whyte
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, 1st Floor Block C, Waterhouse Building, 3 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.,MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sarah J Stock
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Jane E Norman
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alexander E P Heazell
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tesfay N, Legesse F, Kebede M, Woldeyohannes F. Determinants of stillbirth among reviewed perinatal deaths in Ethiopia. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:1030981. [PMID: 36518781 PMCID: PMC9743177 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1030981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global burden of stillbirth has declined over time. However, the problem is still prominent in South Asian and Sub-Saharan African countries. Ethiopia is one of the top stillbirth-reporting countries worldwide. Despite several measures taken to reduce the burden of stillbirth; the pace of decline was not as good as the post-neonatal death. Thus, this study is aimed at identifying potential factors related to stillbirth in Ethiopia based on nationally reviewed perinatal deaths. METHOD The national perinatal death surveillance data were used for this study. A total of 3,814 reviewed perinatal death were included in the study. Two model families,namely generalized estimating equation, and alternating logistic regression models from marginal model family were employed to investigate the risk factors of stillbirth. The alternating logistic regression model was selected as the best fit for the final analysis. RESULT Among reviewed perinatal deaths nearly forty percent (37.4%) were stillbirths. The findings from the multivariate analysis demonstrated that the place of birth (in transit and at home), cause of death (infection, and congenital and chromosomal abnormalities), maternal health condition (women with complications of pregnancy, placenta, and cord), delay one (delay in deciding to seek care) and delay three (delay in receiving adequate care) were associated with an increased risk of having a stillbirth. On the other hand, maternal education (women with primary and above education level) and the type of health facility (women who were treated in secondary and tertiary health care) were associated with a decreased risk of having a stillbirth. CONCLUSION The study identified that both individual (place of delivery, cause of death, maternal health condition, maternal education, and delay one) and facility level (type of health facility and delay three) factors contributed to stillbirth outcome. Therefore, policies that are aimed at encouraging institutional delivery, improving health seeking behavior, and strengthening facility-level readiness should be devised to reduce the high burden of stillbirth in Ethiopia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neamin Tesfay
- Center of Public Emergency Management, Ethiopian Public Health Institutes, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Frehiwot Legesse
- Center of Public Emergency Management, Ethiopian Public Health Institutes, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Mandefro Kebede
- Center of Public Emergency Management, Ethiopian Public Health Institutes, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Fitsum Woldeyohannes
- Health Financing Program, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bhat S, Birdus N, Bhat SM. Ethnic variation in causes of stillbirth in high income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 158:270-277. [PMID: 34767262 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Inequities in stillbirth rate according to ethnicity persist in high income nations. The objective of the present study is to investigate whether causes of stillbirth differ by ethnicity in high-income nations. METHODS The following databases were searched since their inception to 1 February 2021: Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Global Health. Cohort, cross-sectional, and retrospective studies were included. Causes of stillbirth were aligned to the International Classification of Disease 10 for Perinatal Mortality (ICD10-PM) and pooled estimates were derived by meta-analysis. RESULTS Fifteen reports from three countries (72 555 stillbirths) were included. Seven ethnic groups - "Caucasian" (n = 11 studies), "African" (n = 11 studies), "Hispanic" (n = 7 studies), "Indigenous Australian" (n = 4 studies), "Asian" (n = 2 studies), "South Asian" (n = 2 studies), and "American Indian" (n = 1 study) - were identified. There was an overall paucity of recent, high-quality data for many ethnicities. For those with the greatest amount of data - Caucasian, African, and Hispanic - no major differences in the causes of stillbirth were identified. CONCLUSION There is a paucity of high-quality information on causes of stillbirth for many ethnicities. Improving investigation and standardizing classification of stillbirths is needed to assess whether causes of stillbirth differ across more diverse ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saiuj Bhat
- Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Nadya Birdus
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gordon LG, Elliott TM, Marsden T, Ellwood DA, Khong TY, Sexton J, Flenady V. Healthcare costs of investigations for stillbirth from a population-based study in Australia. AUST HEALTH REV 2021; 45:735-744. [PMID: 34706810 DOI: 10.1071/ah20291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective Stillbirth investigations incur healthcare costs, but these investigations are necessary to provide information that will help reduce the risk of a recurrent stillbirth, as well as advice regarding family planning and future pregnancies. The aims of this study were to determine the healthcare costs of investigations for stillbirths, identify drivers and assess cost differences between explained and unexplained stillbirths. Methods Data from 697 stillbirths were extracted from the Stillbirth Causes Study covering the period 2013-18. The dataset comprised all investigations related to stillbirth on the mother, baby and placenta. Unit costs applied were sourced from the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule, local hospital estimates and published literature. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess key factors in cost estimates. Results In all, 200 (28.7%) stillbirths were unexplained and 76.8% of these had between five and eight core investigations. Unexplained stillbirths were twice as likely to have eight core investigations as explained stillbirths (16.5% vs 7.7%). The estimated aggregated cost of stillbirth investigations for 697 stillbirths was A$2.13 million (mean A$3060, median A$4246). The main cost drivers were autopsies or cytogenetic screening. Mean costs were similar when stillbirths had known or unknown causes and by reason for stillbirth among cases with definable causes. Conclusion Investigations for stillbirth in Australia cost approximately A$4200 per stillbirth on average and are critical for managing future pregnancies and preventing more stillbirths. These findings improve our understanding of the costs that may be averted if stillbirths can be prevented through primary prevention initiatives. What is known about the topic? Approximately 2000 stillbirths occur each year in Australia, and this trend has not changed for several decades. Stillbirth investigations incur healthcare costs, but these investigations are necessary to provide information to help reduce the risk of a recurrent stillbirth and advice regarding family planning and future pregnancies. Recommendations for the core set of stillbirth investigations have recently been agreed upon by consensus. What does this paper add? The costs of stillbirth investigations are unknown in Australia. The assessment of these costs is challenging because not all investigations involved in stillbirths are recorded within formal administrative systems because a stillborn baby is not formally recognised as a patient. The present population-based analysis of 697 stillbirths in Australia estimated that, on average, A$4200 was spent on investigations for each stillbirth, with key drivers being autopsies and cytogenetic screening. These costs are typical, with most cases having between five and eight of the core eight recommended investigations. What are the implications for practitioners? There are cost implications for stillbirth investigations, and this analysis gives a true account of current practice in Australia. Together with the high downstream economic costs of stillbirths, the cost burden of stillbirth investigations is high but ultimately avoidable when practitioners adhere to the core investigations, build knowledge around preventable risk factors and use this information to reduce the number of stillbirths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa G Gordon
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Department, Locked Bag 2000, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia. ; and School of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Qld, Australia; and The University of Queensland, School of Public Health, Herston, Qld, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| | - Thomas M Elliott
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Department, Locked Bag 2000, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia.
| | - Tania Marsden
- Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. ; ; ; and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence in Stillbirths, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - David A Ellwood
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence in Stillbirths, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia; and Griffith University, School of Medicine, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia.
| | - T Yee Khong
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence in Stillbirths, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia; and Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Jessica Sexton
- Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. ; ; ; and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence in Stillbirths, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Vicki Flenady
- Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. ; ; ; and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence in Stillbirths, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Widdows K, Roberts SA, Camacho EM, Heazell AEP. Stillbirth rates, service outcomes and costs of implementing NHS England's Saving Babies' Lives care bundle in maternity units in England: A cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250150. [PMID: 33872334 PMCID: PMC8055032 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess implementation of the Saving Babies Lives (SBL) Care Bundle, a collection of practice recommendations in four key areas, to reduce stillbirth in England. Design A retrospective cohort study of 463,630 births in 19 NHS Trusts in England using routinely collected electronic data supplemented with case note audit (n = 1,658), and surveys of service users (n = 2,085) and health care professionals (n = 1,064). The primary outcome was stillbirth rate. Outcome rates two years before and after the nominal SBL implementation date were derived as a measure of change over the implementation period. Data were collected on secondary outcomes and process outcomes which reflected implementation of the SBL care bundle. Results The total stillbirth rate, declined from 4.2 to 3.4 per 1,000 births between the two time points (adjusted Relative Risk (aRR) 0.80, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 0.70 to 0.91, P<0.001). There was a contemporaneous increase in induction of labour (aRR 1.20 (95%CI 1.18–1.21), p<0.001) and emergency Caesarean section (aRR 1.10 (95%CI 1.07–1.12), p<0.001). The number of ultrasound scans performed (aRR 1.25 (95%CI 1.21–1.28), p<0.001) and the proportion of small for gestational age infants detected (aRR 1.59 (95%CI 1.32–1.92), p<0.001) also increased. Organisations reporting higher levels of implementation had improvements in process measures in all elements of the care bundle. An economic analysis estimated the cost of implementing the care bundle at ~£140 per birth. However, neither the costs nor changes in outcomes could be definitively attributed to implementation of the SBL care bundle. Conclusions Implementation of the SBL care bundle increased over time in the majority of sites. Implementation was associated with improvements in process outcomes. The reduction in stillbirth rates in participating sites exceeded that reported nationally in the same timeframe. The intervention should be refined to identify women who are most likely to benefit and minimise unwarranted intervention. Trial registration The study was registered on (NCT03231007); www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Widdows
- Faculty of Biological, Medical and Health, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen A. Roberts
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth M. Camacho
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander E. P. Heazell
- Faculty of Biological, Medical and Health, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- St. Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Burden C, Bakhbakhi D, Heazell AE, Lynch M, Timlin L, Bevan C, Storey C, Kurinczuk JJ, Siassakos D. Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044563. [PMID: 33727271 PMCID: PMC7970278 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE When a formal review of care takes places after the death of a baby, parents are largely unaware it takes place and are often not meaningfully involved in the review process. Parent engagement in the process is likely to be essential for a successful review and to improve patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate an intervention process of parental engagement in perinatal mortality review (PNMR) and to identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation. DESIGN Mixed-methods study of parents' engagement in PNMR. SETTING Single tertiary maternity unit in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Bereaved parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs). INTERVENTIONS Parent engagement in the PNMR (intervention) was based on principles derived through national consensus and qualitative research with parents, HCPs and stakeholders in the UK. OUTCOMES Recruitment rates, bereaved parents and HCPs' perceptions. RESULTS Eighty-one per cent of bereaved parents approached (13/16) agreed to participate in the study. Two focus groups with bereaved parents (n=11) and HCP (n=7) were carried out postimplementation to investigate their perceptions of the process.Overarching findings were improved dialogue and continuity of care with parents, and improvements in the PNMR process and patient safety. Bereaved parents agreed that engagement in the PNMR process was invaluable and helped them in their grieving. HCP perceived that parent involvement improved the review process and lessons learnt from the deaths; information to understand the impact of aspects of care on the baby's death were often only found in the parents' recollections. CONCLUSIONS Parental engagement in the PNMR process is achievable and useful for parents and HCP alike, and critically can improve patient safety and future care for mothers and babies. To learn and prevent perinatal deaths effectively, all hospitals should give parents the option to engage with the review of their baby's death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christy Burden
- Bristol Medical School, Department of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Danya Bakhbakhi
- Bristol Medical School, Department of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Mary Lynch
- Bristol Medical School, Department of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura Timlin
- Bristol Medical School, Department of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- University College London Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
- University College London Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome EPSRC centre for Interventional + Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London, UK
- NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schroeder E, Yang M, Brocklehurst P, Linsell L, Rivero-Arias O. Economic evaluation of computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour: a cost-consequence analysis alongside the INFANT study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2021; 106:143-148. [PMID: 32796054 PMCID: PMC7907561 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-318806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Economic evaluation of computerised decision-support software intended to assist in the interpretation of a cardiotocography (CTG) during birth. DESIGN Individual patient level data from the INFANT study (an unmasked randomised controlled trial). SETTING Maternity units in the UK and Ireland. POPULATION Singleton or twin pregnancy women of 35 weeks' gestation or more and receiving continuous electronic fetal monitoring during labour. INTERVENTION Computerised decision-support software. METHODS Cost-consequence analysis presenting costs and outcomes with a time horizon of 2 years from a government healthcare perspective. Unit cost data collected from a combination of primary and secondary sources. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary clinical outcomes were (i) composite 'poor neonatal outcome' and (ii) developmental assessment at age 2 years in a subset of surviving children. Mean cost per mother and infant dyad from birth to hospital discharge, and from hospital discharge to 24 months follow-up. Maternal health-related quality of life was assessed at 12 and 24 months follow-up using the EuroQol three-level health-related quality of life instrument (EQ-5D-3L). RESULTS Data were analysed for 46 042 women and 46 614 infants. No statistically significant differences were detected between trial arms in any of the primary clinical outcomes or maternal quality of life. No statistically significant differences in costs were detected in maternal or infant costs from trial entry to hospital discharge or overall from hospital discharge to 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Decision-support software during labour is not associated with additional maternal or infant benefits and over a 2-year period the software did not lead to additional costs or savings to the National Health Service. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN98680152.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Schroeder
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Miaoqing Yang
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Brocklehurst
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Louise Linsell
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Oliver Rivero-Arias
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dawood FS, Kittikraisak W, Patel A, Rentz Hunt D, Suntarattiwong P, Wesley MG, Thompson MG, Soto G, Mundhada S, Arriola CS, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Brummer T, Cabrera S, Chang HH, Deshmukh M, Ellison D, Florian R, Gonzales O, Kurhe K, Kaoiean S, Rawangban B, Lindstrom S, Llajaruna E, Mott JA, Saha S, Prakash A, Mohanty S, Sinthuwattanawibool C, Tinoco Y. Incidence of influenza during pregnancy and association with pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in three middle-income countries: a multisite prospective longitudinal cohort study. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2021; 21:97-106. [PMID: 33129424 PMCID: PMC10563867 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30592-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccination during pregnancy prevents influenza among women and their infants but remains underused among pregnant women. We aimed to quantify the risk of antenatal influenza and examine its association with perinatal outcomes. METHODS We did a prospective cohort study in pregnant women in India, Peru, and Thailand. Before the 2017 and 2018 influenza seasons, we enrolled pregnant women aged 18 years or older with expected delivery dates 8 weeks or more after the season started. We contacted women twice weekly until the end of pregnancy to identify illnesses with symptoms of myalgia, cough, runny nose or nasal congestion, sore throat, or difficulty breathing and collected mid-turbinate nasal swabs from symptomatic women for influenza real-time RT-PCR testing. We assessed the association of antenatal influenza with preterm birth, late pregnancy loss (≥13 weeks gestation), small for gestational age (SGA), and birthweight of term singleton infants using Cox proportional hazards models or generalised linear models to adjust for potential confounders. FINDINGS Between March 13, 2017, and Aug 3, 2018, we enrolled 11 277 women with a median age of 26 years (IQR 23-31) and gestational age of 19 weeks (14-24). 1474 (13%) received influenza vaccines. 310 participants (3%) had influenza (270 [87%] influenza A and 40 [13%] influenza B). Influenza incidences weighted by the population of women of childbearing age in each study country were 88·7 per 10 000 pregnant woman-months (95% CI 68·6 to 114·8) during the 2017 season and 69·6 per 10 000 pregnant woman-months (53·8 to 90·2) during the 2018 season. Antenatal influenza was not associated with preterm birth (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1·4, 95% CI 0·9 to 2·0; p=0·096) or having an SGA infant (adjusted relative risk 1·0, 95% CI 0·8 to 1·3, p=0·97), but was associated with late pregnancy loss (aHR 10·7, 95% CI 4·3 to 27·0; p<0·0001) and reduction in mean birthweight of term, singleton infants (-55·3 g, 95% CI -109·3 to -1·4; p=0·0445). INTERPRETATION Women had a 0·7-0·9% risk of influenza per month of pregnancy during the influenza season, and antenatal influenza was associated with increased risk for some adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings support the added value of antenatal influenza vaccination to improve perinatal outcomes. FUNDING US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. TRANSLATIONS For the Thai, Hindi, Marathi and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatimah S Dawood
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Wanitchaya Kittikraisak
- Thailand Ministry of Public Health-US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Archana Patel
- Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India; Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, India
| | | | - Piyarat Suntarattiwong
- Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Thailand Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Meredith G Wesley
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Abt Associates, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mark G Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Giselle Soto
- US Naval Medical Research Unit No 6, Bellavista, Peru
| | | | - Carmen S Arriola
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Howard H Chang
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Damon Ellison
- Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | - Kunal Kurhe
- Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India
| | | | | | - Stephen Lindstrom
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Joshua A Mott
- Thailand Ministry of Public Health-US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Siddhartha Saha
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Sarita Mohanty
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Yeny Tinoco
- US Naval Medical Research Unit No 6, Bellavista, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Huntington S, Weston G, Seedat F, Marshall J, Bailey H, Tebruegge M, Ahmed I, Turner K, Adams E. Repeat screening for syphilis in pregnancy as an alternative screening strategy in the UK: a cost-effectiveness analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038505. [PMID: 33444184 PMCID: PMC7678359 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the cost-effectiveness of universal repeat screening for syphilis in late pregnancy, compared with the current strategy of single screening in early pregnancy with repeat screening offered only to high-risk women. DESIGN A decision tree model was developed to assess the incremental costs and health benefits of the two screening strategies. The base case analysis considered short-term costs during the pregnancy and the initial weeks after delivery. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. SETTING UK antenatal screening programme. POPULATION Hypothetical cohort of pregnant women who access antenatal care and receive a syphilis screen in 1 year. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the cost to avoid one case of congenital syphilis (CS). Secondary outcomes were the cost to avoid one case of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) or neonatal death and the number of women needing to be screened/treated to avoid one case of CS, IUFD or neonatal death. The cost per quality-adjusted life year gained was assessed in scenario analyses. RESULTS Base case results indicated that for pregnant women in the UK (n=725 891), the repeat screening strategy would result in 5.5 fewer cases of CS (from 8.8 to 3.3), 0.1 fewer cases of neonatal death and 0.3 fewer cases of IUFD annually compared with the single screening strategy. This equates to an additional £1.8 million per case of CS prevented. When lifetime horizon was considered, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the repeat screening strategy was £120 494. CONCLUSIONS Universal repeat screening for syphilis in pregnancy is unlikely to be cost-effective in the current UK setting where syphilis prevalence is low. Repeat screening may be cost-effective in countries with a higher syphilis incidence in pregnancy, particularly if the cost per screen is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Farah Seedat
- UK National Screening Committee, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - John Marshall
- UK National Screening Committee, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Heather Bailey
- UCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marc Tebruegge
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Katy Turner
- School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Relph S, Delaney L, Melaugh A, Vieira MC, Sandall J, Khalil A, Pasupathy D, Healey A. Costing the impact of interventions during pregnancy in the UK: a systematic review of economic evaluations. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040022. [PMID: 33127635 PMCID: PMC7604861 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this review was to summarise the current evidence on the costing of resource use within UK maternity care, in order to facilitate the estimation of incremental resource and cost impacts potentially attributable to maternity care interventions. METHODS A systematic review of economic evaluations was conducted by searching Medline, the Health Management Information Consortium, the National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluations Database, CINAHL and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for economic evaluations within UK maternity care, published between January 2010 and August 2019 in the English language. Unit costs for healthcare activities provided to women within the antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal period were inflated to 2018-2019 prices. Assessment of study quality was performed using the Quality of Health Economic Analyses checklist. RESULTS Of 5084 titles or full texts screened, 37 papers were included in the final review (27 primary research articles, 7 review articles and 3 economic evaluations from NICE guidelines). Of the 27 primary research articles, 21 were scored as high quality, 3 as medium quality and 3 were low quality. Variation was noted in cost estimates for healthcare activities throughout the maternity care pathway: for midwife-led outpatient appointment, the range was £27.34-£146.25 (mean £81.78), emergency caesarean section, range was £1056.44-£4982.21 (mean £3508.93) and postnatal admission, range was £103.00-£870.10 per day (mean £469.55). CONCLUSIONS Wide variation exists in costs applied to maternity healthcare activities, resulting in challenges in attributing cost to maternity activities. The level of variation in cost calculations is likely to reflect the uncertainty within the system and must be dealt with by conducting sensitivity analyses. Nationally agreed prices for granular unit costs are needed to standardise cost-effectiveness evaluations of new interventions within maternity care, to be used either for research purposes or decisions regarding national intervention uptake. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019145309.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Relph
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Louisa Delaney
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alexandra Melaugh
- Health Improvement: Alcohol, Drugs, Tobacco and Justice Division, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Matias C Vieira
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Jane Sandall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Molecular & Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK
| | - Dharmintra Pasupathy
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Neonatology, Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicineand Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andy Healey
- Health Service and Population Research, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McIntyre KR, Vincent KMM, Hayward CE, Li X, Sibley CP, Desforges M, Greenwood SL, Dilworth MR. Human placental uptake of glutamine and glutamate is reduced in fetal growth restriction. Sci Rep 2020; 10:16197. [PMID: 33004923 PMCID: PMC7530652 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72930-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a significant risk factor for stillbirth, neonatal complications and adulthood morbidity. Compared with those of appropriate weight for gestational age (AGA), FGR babies have smaller placentas with reduced activity of amino acid transporter systems A and L, thought to contribute to poor fetal growth. The amino acids glutamine and glutamate are essential for normal placental function and fetal development; whether transport of these is altered in FGR is unknown. We hypothesised that FGR is associated with reduced placental glutamine and glutamate transporter activity and expression, and propose the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway as a candidate mechanism. FGR infants [individualised birth weight ratio (IBR) < 5th centile] had lighter placentas, reduced initial rate uptake of 14C-glutamine and 14C-glutamate (per mg placental protein) but higher expression of key transporter proteins (glutamine: LAT1, LAT2, SNAT5, glutamate: EAAT1) versus AGA [IBR 20th-80th]. In further experiments, in vitro exposure to rapamycin inhibited placental glutamine and glutamate uptake (24 h, uncomplicated pregnancies) indicating a role of mTOR in regulating placental transport of these amino acids. These data support our hypothesis and suggest that abnormal glutamine and glutamate transporter activity is part of the spectrum of placental dysfunction in FGR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty R McIntyre
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. .,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. .,School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Medical School Building, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
| | - Kirsty M M Vincent
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Christina E Hayward
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Xiaojia Li
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Colin P Sibley
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Michelle Desforges
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Susan L Greenwood
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark R Dilworth
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fernández-Sola C, Camacho-Ávila M, Hernández-Padilla JM, Fernández-Medina IM, Jiménez-López FR, Hernández-Sánchez E, Conesa-Ferrer MB, Granero-Molina J. Impact of Perinatal Death on the Social and Family Context of the Parents. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E3421. [PMID: 32422977 PMCID: PMC7277582 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perinatal death (PD) is a painful experience, with physical, psychological and social consequences in families. Each year, there are 2.7 million perinatal deaths in the world and about 2000 in Spain. The aim of this study was to explore, describe and understand the impact of perinatal death on parents' social and family life. METHODS A qualitative study based on Gadamer's hermeneutic phenomenology was used. In-depth interviews were conducted with 13 mothers and eight fathers who had suffered a perinatal death. Inductive analysis was used to find themes based on the data. RESULTS Seven sub-themes emerged, and they were grouped into two main themes: 1) perinatal death affects family dynamics, and 2) the social environment of the parents is severely affected after perinatal death. CONCLUSIONS PD impacts the family dynamics of the parents and their family, social and work environments. Parents perceive that society trivializes their loss and disallows or delegitimizes their grief. IMPLICATIONS Social care, health and education providers should pay attention to all family members who have suffered a PD. The recognition of the loss within the social and family environment would help the families to cope with their grief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cayetano Fernández-Sola
- Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almeria, 04120 La Cañada de San Urbano, Spain; (I.M.F.-M.); (F.R.J.-L.); (J.G.-M.)
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 01090, Chile
| | - Marcos Camacho-Ávila
- Hospital La Inmaculada, 04600 Huércal-Overa, Spain;
- Hospital de Torrevieja, 03186 Torrevieja, Spain;
| | - José Manuel Hernández-Padilla
- Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almeria, 04120 La Cañada de San Urbano, Spain; (I.M.F.-M.); (F.R.J.-L.); (J.G.-M.)
- School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London NW4 4BH, UK
| | - Isabel María Fernández-Medina
- Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almeria, 04120 La Cañada de San Urbano, Spain; (I.M.F.-M.); (F.R.J.-L.); (J.G.-M.)
| | - Francisca Rosa Jiménez-López
- Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almeria, 04120 La Cañada de San Urbano, Spain; (I.M.F.-M.); (F.R.J.-L.); (J.G.-M.)
| | - Encarnación Hernández-Sánchez
- Hospital de Torrevieja, 03186 Torrevieja, Spain;
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Católica de San Antonio de Murcia, 30107 Guadalupe de Maciascoque, Spain
| | | | - José Granero-Molina
- Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almeria, 04120 La Cañada de San Urbano, Spain; (I.M.F.-M.); (F.R.J.-L.); (J.G.-M.)
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 01090, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stacey T, Tennant P. Authors’ reply re: Gestational diabetes and the risk of late stillbirth: a case–control study from England,
UK. BJOG 2019; 126:1184. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasina Stacey
- University of Huddersfield/Calderdale and Huddersfield Foundation Trust Huddersfield UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pan W, Tu H, Jin L, Hu C, Li Y, Wang R, Huang W, Liao S. Decision analysis about the cost-effectiveness of different in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer protocol under considering governments, hospitals, and patient. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e15492. [PMID: 31083186 PMCID: PMC6531099 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore the benefits of in vitro fertilization (IVF) for patients and hospitals under different protocols and if IVF treatment should be incorporated into health care. PERSPECTIVE The government should consider including IVF treatment in health insurance. Hospitals and patients could obtain the best benefit by following the hospital's recommended protocol. SETTING This retrospective study was conducted from January 2014 to August 2017 at an academic hospital. METHODS A total of 7440 patients used gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) protocol, 2619 patients used, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists (GnRHant) protocol, and 1514 patients used GnRHa ultra-long protocol. Primary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR), cost-effectiveness, hospital revenue, and government investment. RESULTS The cycle times for the GnRHa protocol and the GnRHa ultra-long protocol were significantly higher than the GnRHant protocol. Patients who were ≤29 years chose the GnRHant protocol. The cost of a successful cycle was 67,579.39 ± 9,917.55 ¥ and LBR was 29.25%. Patients who were >30 years had the GnRHa protocol as the dominant strategy, as it was more effective at lower costs and higher LBR. When patients were >30 to ≤34 years, the cost of a successful cycle was 66,556.7 ± 8,448.08 ¥ and the LBR was 31.05%. When patients were >35 years, the cost of a successful cycle was 83,297.92 ± 10,918.05 ¥ and the LBR was 25.07%. The government reimbursement for a cycle ranged between 11,372.12 ± 2,147.71 ¥ and 12,753.67 ± 1,905.02 ¥. CONCLUSIONS The government should consider including IVF treatment in health insurance. Hospitals recommend the GnRHant protocol for patients <29 years old and the GnRHa protocol for patients >30 years old, to obtain the best benefits. Patients could obtain the best benefit by using the protocol recommended by the hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Pan
- Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei
- School of Economic and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan
- Management Science and Data Analytics Research Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Haiting Tu
- School of Economic and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan
- Management Science and Data Analytics Research Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Lei Jin
- Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei
| | - Cheng Hu
- School of Economic and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan
- Management Science and Data Analytics Research Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yuehan Li
- Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei
| | - Renjie Wang
- Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei
| | - Weiming Huang
- Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei
| | - ShuJie Liao
- Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Watson J, Simmonds A, La Fontaine M, Fockler ME. Pregnancy and infant loss: a survey of families' experiences in Ontario Canada. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:129. [PMID: 30991981 PMCID: PMC6469137 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2270-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pregnancy and infant loss has a pervasive impact on families, health systems, and communities. During and after loss, compassionate, individualized, and skilled support from professionals and organizations is important, but often lacking. Historically, little has been known about how families in Ontario access existing care and supports around the time of their loss and their experiences of receiving such care. Methods An online cross-sectional survey, including both closed-ended multiple choice questions and one open-ended question, was completed by 596 people in Ontario, Canada relating to their experiences of care and support following pregnancy loss and infant death. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively using frequency distributions. Responses to the one open-ended question were thematically analyzed using a qualitative inductive approach. Results The majority of families told us that around the time of their loss, they felt they were not adequately informed, supported and cared for by healthcare professionals, and that their healthcare provider lacked the skills needed to care for them. Almost half of respondents reported experiencing stigma from providers, exacerbating their experience of loss. Positive encounters with care providers were marked by timely, individualized, and compassionate care. Families indicated that improvements in care could be made by providing information and explanations, discharge and follow-up instructions, and through discussions about available supports. Conclusions Healthcare professionals can make a positive difference in how loss is experienced and in overall well-being by recognizing the impact of the loss, minimizing uncertainty and isolation, and by thoughtfully working within physical environments often not designed for the experience of loss. Ongoing supports are needed and should be tailored to parents’ changing needs. Prioritizing access to specialized education for professionals providing services and care to this population may help to reduce the stigma experienced by bereaved families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Watson
- Pregnancy and Infant Loss (PAIL) Network, Women and Babies Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Anne Simmonds
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle La Fontaine
- Pregnancy and Infant Loss (PAIL) Network, Women and Babies Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Megan E Fockler
- Pregnancy and Infant Loss (PAIL) Network, Women and Babies Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Campbell HE, Kurinczuk JJ, Heazell A, Leal J, Rivero-Arias O. Healthcare and wider societal implications of stillbirth: a population-based cost-of-illness study. BJOG 2017; 125:108-117. [PMID: 29034559 PMCID: PMC5767761 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Objective To extend previous work and estimate health and social care costs, litigation costs, funeral‐related costs, and productivity losses associated with stillbirth in the UK. Design A population‐based cost‐of‐illness study using a synthesis of secondary data. Setting The National Health Service (NHS) and wider society in the UK. Population Stillbirths occurring within a 12‐month period and subsequent events occurring over the following 2 years. Methods Costs were estimated using published data on events, resource use, and unit costs. Main outcome measures Mean health and social care costs, litigation costs, funeral‐related costs, and productivity costs for 2 years, reported for a single stillbirth and at a national level. Results Mean health and social care costs per stillbirth were £4191. Additionally, funeral‐related costs were £559, and workplace absence (parents and healthcare professionals) was estimated to cost £3829 per stillbirth. For the UK, the annual health and social care costs were estimated at £13.6 million, and total productivity losses amounted to £706.1 million (98% of this cost was attributable to the loss of the life of the baby). The figures for total productivity losses were sensitive to the perspective adopted about the loss of life of the baby. Conclusion This work expands the current intelligence on the costs of stillbirth beyond the health service to costs for parents and society, and yet these additional findings must still be regarded as conservative estimates of the true economic costs. Tweetable abstract The costs of stillbirth are significant, affecting the health service, parents, professionals, and society. Plain Language Summary The costs of stillbirth are significant, affecting the health service, parents, professionals, and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H E Campbell
- Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J J Kurinczuk
- Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aep Heazell
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - J Leal
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - O Rivero-Arias
- Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|