1
|
Jaufuraully S, Parris D, Opie J, Siassakos D. A new course on assisted rotational birth and complex caesarean section - Mixed methods evaluation of Art & Craft. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 296:126-130. [PMID: 38432018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the utility of Art & Craft - a new, hands-on course on Advanced Rotational Techniques and safe Caesarean biRth at Advanced/Full dilation Training aimed at senior Obstetrics trainees. The aims were to assess whether it improved confidence and skills in rotational vaginal birth, impacted fetal head at caesarean, and ultrasound for fetal position. STUDY DESIGN With ethical approval, pre- and post- course questionnaires and post- course interviews of attendees were conducted. A pre course questionnaire was emailed 1 week before the course. Attendees were asked to rate their confidence levels in performing vaginal examination and ultrasound assessment of fetal position, rotational ventouse, manual rotation, Kielland's rotational forceps, and disimpaction of the fetal head during second stage caesarean on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 = not confident at all and 5 = very confident. A post-course questionnaire with the same questions was emailed 3 days after. p values for differences in scores were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test using Stata/MP 18 software. RESULTS 32 trainees attended the course. 28 questionnaires were available for analysis. The majority 39 % were middle grade (ST3-ST5) level. Initial confidence was very low for rotational forceps (median 1/5). After attending the course and practical stations, respondents' confidence levels increased significantly (p < 0.05) across all domains; vaginal examination from 4 to 5, ultrasound for fetal position, rotational ventouse, and manual rotation from 3 to 5, disimpaction from 4 to 4.5, and Kielland's rotational forceps from 1 to 4. Nine participated in post course interviews, which were thematically analysed. Participants expressed that the course gave them the opportunity to ask specific questions from experts to improve their confidence. A barrier to learning new methods was highlighted in that it is difficult to receive practical training in Kielland's, resulting in low confidence. CONCLUSION A practical, hands-on course on complex operative birth significantly increases trainee confidence levels in vaginal examination, ultrasound for fetal position, disimpaction, and techniques for rotational vaginal birth. The evaluation highlights that continued education and practise is required, even when trainees are senior. Evaluation of clinical outcomes after training is needed; and planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shireen Jaufuraully
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, 43-45 Foley St, London W1W 7TY, United Kingdom; Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 84-86 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HU, United Kingdom
| | - Dawn Parris
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 84-86 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HU, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Opie
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, 43-45 Foley St, London W1W 7TY, United Kingdom
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, 43-45 Foley St, London W1W 7TY, United Kingdom; Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 84-86 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HU, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University College London Hospitals, Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Maple House Suite A 1st floor 149 Tottenham Court Road London W1T 7DN, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jaufuraully SR, Salvadores Fernandez C, Abbas N, Desjardins A, Tiwari MK, David AL, Siassakos D. A sensorised surgical glove to improve training and detection of obstetric anal sphincter injury: A preclinical study on a pig model. BJOG 2024. [PMID: 38247347 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To create a sensorised surgical glove that can accurately identify obstetric anal sphincter injury to facilitate timely repair, reduce complications and aid training. DESIGN Proof-of-concept. SETTING Laboratory. SAMPLE Pig models. METHODS Flexible triboelectric pressure/force sensors were mounted onto the fingertips of a routine surgical glove. The sensors produce a current when rubbed on materials of different characteristics which can be analysed. A per rectum examination was performed on the intact sphincter of pig cadavers, analogous to routine examination for obstetric anal sphincter injuries postpartum. An anal sphincter defect was created by cutting through the vaginal mucosa and into the external anal sphincter using a scalpel. The sphincter was then re-examined. Data and signals were interpreted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivity and specificity of the glove in detecting anal sphincter injury. RESULTS In all, 200 examinations were performed. The sensors detected anal sphincter injuries in a pig model with sensitivities between 98% and 100% and a specificity of 100%. The current produced when examining an intact sphincter and sphincter with a defect was significantly different (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In this preliminary study, the sensorised glove accurately detected anal sphincter injury in a pig model. Future plans include its clinical translation, starting with an in-human study on postpartum women, to determine whether it can accurately detect different types of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shireen R Jaufuraully
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carmen Salvadores Fernandez
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nadine Abbas
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Adrien Desjardins
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Manish K Tiwari
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anna L David
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jie M, Jaufuraully S, Lambert J, Napolitano R, Siassakos D. Second trimester abnormal uterine artery Dopplers and adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes when PAPP-a is normal. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2023; 36:2230515. [PMID: 37401032 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2230515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the association between abnormal uterine artery Dopplers (combined PI > 2.5) - with normal PAPP-A - and adverse obstetric/neonatal outcomes. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 800 patients between 1 March 2019 - 23 November 2021 in a tertiary UK hospital, where it is routine to measure uterine artery Dopplers of all pregnancies during their anomaly scans. 400 nulliparous women/birthing people with complete data were included. 400 nulliparous controls scanned in the same time frame (1.5 years) with normal PAPP-A and uterine artery Dopplers were matched for age and BMI. Outcomes included: mode of birth, postpartum complications, birth weight/centile, Apgar score, gestational age at delivery, neonatal unit admission, and clinical neonatal hypoglycemia. Multivariable analysis was used. RESULTS Compared to controls, pregnancies with abnormal uterine artery Dopplers and normal PAPP-A were at increased risk of induction (46.5% vs 35.5%, p = .042), cesarean section (46.0% vs 38.0%, p = .002), emergency cesarean section (35.0% vs 26.5%, p = .009), and pre-eclampsia 5.8% vs 2.5%, p = .021). Their babies were more likely to be admitted to the neonatal unit - mostly for prematurity (15.3% vs 6.3%, p = .0004), hypoglycemia (4.0% vs 1.0%, p = .007), be small for gestational age (26.5% vs 11.5%, p = .0001), had intrauterine growth restriction (10.8% vs 1.3%, p = .0001), and be born prematurely (10.0% vs 3.5%, p = .002). Routine measurement of uterine artery Dopplers increased the detection rate of small for gestational age fetuses by 15.1%. Over half of the babies admitted with neonatal hypoglycemia in pregnancies with abnormal uterine artery Dopplers had an unexplained cause. CONCLUSIONS Pregnancies with abnormal uterine Dopplers are not only at increased risk of pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age fetuses/intrauterine growth restriction, but are also at increased risk of emergency cesarean section and adverse neonatal outcomes. The increased incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia is likely driven to some degree by prematurity and placental complications, but possibly also by undiagnosed glucose dysmetabolism. This may warrant routine measurement of uterine artery Dopplers in all pregnancies (regardless of risk), where feasible, to aid antenatal management and counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Jie
- Ultrasound Screening Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Shireen Jaufuraully
- UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Intperventional and Surgical Sciences, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - James Lambert
- School of Economics and Finance, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Raffaele Napolitano
- Ultrasound Screening Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Intperventional and Surgical Sciences, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yusuf H, Stokes J, Wattar BHA, Petrie A, Whitten SM, Siassakos D. Chance of healthy versus adverse outcome in subsequent pregnancy after previous loss beyond 16 weeks: data from a specialized follow-up clinic. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2023; 36:2165062. [PMID: 36632655 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2165062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with a previous fetal demise have a 2-20 fold increased risk of another stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy when compared to those who have had a live birth. Despite this, there is limited research regarding the management and outcomes of subsequent pregnancies. This study was conducted to accurately quantify the chances of a woman having a healthy subsequent pregnancy after a pregnancy loss. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary-level unit between March 2019 and April 2021. We collected data on all women with a history of previous fetal demise attending a specialized perinatal history clinic and compared the risk of subsequent stillbirth to those with a normal pregnancy outcome. Outcome data included birth outcome, obstetric and medical complications, gestational age and birth weight and mode of delivery. Those who had healthy subsequent pregnancies were compared with those who experienced adverse outcomes. RESULTS A total of 101 cases were reviewed. Ninety-six women with subsequent pregnancies after a history of fetal demise from 16 weeks were included. Seventy-nine percent of women (n = 76) delivered a baby at term, without complications. Overall, 2.1% had repeat pregnancy losses (n = 2) and 2.1% delivered babies with fetal growth restriction (n = 2). There were no cases of abruption in a subsequent pregnancy. Eighteen neonates were delivered prematurely (18.4%), 15 of these (83.3%) were due to iatrogenic causes and three (16.7%) were spontaneous. In univariable logistic regression analyses, those with adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies had greater odds of pre-eclampsia (Odds ratio *(OR) = 3.89, 95% CI = 1.05-14.43, p = .042) and fetal growth restriction (OR = 4.58, 95% CI = 1.41-14.82, p = 0.011) in previous pregnancies compared to those with healthy outcomes. However, in multivariable logistic regression analyses, neither variable had a significant odds ratio (OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 0.44-9.39, p = .366 and OR = 3.42, 95% CI = 0.90 - 13.09, p = .072 for pre-eclampsia and FGR, respectively). CONCLUSION Four in five women had a healthy subsequent pregnancy. This is a reassuring figure for women when contemplating another pregnancy, particularly if cared for in a specialist clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Yusuf
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,UCL Medical School, University College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jenny Stokes
- Division of Women's Health, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Bassel H Al Wattar
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,Reproductive Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Aviva Petrie
- UCL Eastman Dental Institute, University College, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Sara M Whitten
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,Division of Women's Health, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,Division of Women's Health, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Le Lous M, Beridot C, Baxter JSH, Huaulme A, Vasconcelos F, Stoyanov D, Siassakos D, Jannin P. Physical environment of the operating room during cesarean section: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 288:1-6. [PMID: 37406465 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Environmental factors in the operating room during cesarean sections are likely important for both women/birthing people and their babies but there is currently a lack of rigorous literature about their evaluation. The principal aim of this study was to systematically examine studies published on the physical environment in the obstetrical operating room during c-sections and its impact on mother and neonate outcomes. The secondary objective was to identify the sensors used to investigate the operating room environment during cesarean sections. METHODS In this literature review, we searched MEDLINE a database using the following keywords: Cesarean section AND (operating room environment OR Noise OR Music OR Video recording OR Light level OR Gentle OR Temperature OR Motion Data). Eligible studies had to be published in English or French within the past 10 years and had to investigate the operating room environment during cesarean sections in women. For each study we reported which aspects of the physical environment were investigated in the OR (i.e., noise, music, movement, light or temperature) and the involved sensors. RESULTS Of a total of 105 studies screened, we selected 8 articles from title and abstract in PubMed. This small number shows that the field is poorly investigated. The most evaluated environment factors to date are operating room noise and temperature, and the presence of music. Few studies used advanced sensors in the operating room to evaluate environmental factors in a more nuanced and complete way. Two studies concern the sound level, four concern music, one concerns temperature and one analyzed the number of entrances/exits into the OR. No study analyzed light level or more fine-grained movement data. CONCLUSIONS Main findings include increase of noise and motion at specific time-points, for example during delivery or anaesthesia; the positive impact of music on parents and staff alike; and that a warmer theatre is better for babies but more uncomfortable for surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maela Le Lous
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Rennes, France; LTSI - INSERM UMR 1099, University of Rennes 1, F35000 Rennes, France; Department of Computer Science, Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Caroline Beridot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Rennes, France
| | - John S H Baxter
- LTSI - INSERM UMR 1099, University of Rennes 1, F35000 Rennes, France
| | - Arnaud Huaulme
- LTSI - INSERM UMR 1099, University of Rennes 1, F35000 Rennes, France
| | - Francisco Vasconcelos
- Department of Computer Science, Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Danail Stoyanov
- Department of Computer Science, Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Department of Computer Science, Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, United Kingdom; EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pierre Jannin
- LTSI - INSERM UMR 1099, University of Rennes 1, F35000 Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bagchi B, Datta P, Fernandez CS, Gupta P, Jaufuraully S, David AL, Siassakos D, Desjardins A, Tiwari MK. Flexible triboelectric nanogenerators using transparent copper nanowire electrodes: energy harvesting, sensing human activities and material recognition. Mater Horiz 2023; 10:3124-3134. [PMID: 37221946 PMCID: PMC10389064 DOI: 10.1039/d3mh00404j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) have emerged as a promising green technology to efficiently harvest otherwise wasted mechanical energy from the environment and human activities. However, cost-effective and reliably performing TENGs require rational integration of triboelectric materials, spacers, and electrodes. The present work reports for the first time the use of oxydation-resistant pure copper nanowires (CuNWs) as an electrode to develop a flexible, and inexpensive TENG through a potentially scalable approach involving vacuum filtration and lactic acid treatment. A ∼6 cm2 device yields a remarkable open circuit voltage (Voc) of 200 V and power density of 10.67 W m-2 under human finger tapping. The device is robust, flexible and noncytotoxic as assessed by stretching/bending maneuvers, corrosion tests, continuous operation for 8000 cycles, and biocompatibility tests using human fibroblast cells. The device can power 115 light emitting diodes (LEDs) and a digital calculator; sense bending and motion from the human hand; and transmit Morse code signals. The robustness, flexibility, transparency, and non-cytotoxicity of the device render it particularly promising for a wide range of energy harvesting and advanced healthcare applications, such as sensorised smart gloves for tactile sensing, material identification and safer surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biswajoy Bagchi
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, UCL, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
- Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, UCL Mechanical Engineering, London, WC1E 7JE, UK
| | - Priyankan Datta
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, UCL, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
- Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, UCL Mechanical Engineering, London, WC1E 7JE, UK
| | - Carmen Salvadores Fernandez
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, UCL, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
- Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, UCL Mechanical Engineering, London, WC1E 7JE, UK
| | - Priya Gupta
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, UCL, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
- Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, UCL Mechanical Engineering, London, WC1E 7JE, UK
| | - Shireen Jaufuraully
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, UCL, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - Anna L David
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, UCL, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, WC1E 6AU, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCL, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, UCL, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, WC1E 6AU, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCL, UK
| | - Adrien Desjardins
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, UCL, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Manish K Tiwari
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, UCL, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
- Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, UCL Mechanical Engineering, London, WC1E 7JE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Atkins B, Siassakos D, Aggarwal N. Editorial: Stillbirths in low-middle income countries: challenges & experiences. Front Glob Womens Health 2023; 4:1240004. [PMID: 37560035 PMCID: PMC10408291 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1240004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Neelam Aggarwal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Parris D, Siassakos D. Are Kielland forceps a safe option for birth? BJOG 2023; 130:865. [PMID: 36719176 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Parris
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Salvadores Fernandez C, Jaufuraully S, Bagchi B, Chen W, Datta P, Gupta P, David AL, Siassakos D, Desjardins A, Tiwari MK. A Triboelectric Nanocomposite for Sterile Sensing, Energy Harvesting, and Haptic Diagnostics in Interventional Procedures from Surgical Gloves. Adv Healthc Mater 2023; 12:e2202673. [PMID: 36849872 PMCID: PMC10614699 DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202202673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Advanced interfacial engineering has the potential to enable the successful realization of three features that are particularly important for a variety of healthcare applications: wettability control, antimicrobial activity to reduce infection risks, and sensing of physiological parameters. Here, a sprayable multifunctional triboelectric coating is exploited as a nontoxic, ultrathin tactile sensor that can be integrated directly on the fingertips of surgical gloves. The coating is based on a polymer blend mixed with zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles, which enables antifouling and antibacterial properties. Additionally, the nanocomposite is superhydrophobic (self-cleaning) and is not cytotoxic. The coating is also triboelectric and can be applied directly onto surgical gloves with printed electrodes. The sensorized gloves so obtained enable mechanical energy harvesting, force sensing, and detection of materials stiffness changes directly from fingertip, which may complement proprioceptive feedback for clinicians. Just as importantly, the sensors also work with a second glove on top offering better reassurance regarding sterility in interventional procedures. As a case study of clinical use for stiffness detection, the sensors demonstrate successful detection of pig anal sphincter injury ex vivo. This may lead to improving the accuracy of diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injury, resulting in prompt repair, fewer complications, and improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Salvadores Fernandez
- Nanoengineered Systems LaboratoryMechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonWC1E 7JEUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonW1W 7TSUK
| | - Shireen Jaufuraully
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonW1W 7TSUK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonWC1E 6AUUK
| | - Biswajoy Bagchi
- Nanoengineered Systems LaboratoryMechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonWC1E 7JEUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonW1W 7TSUK
| | - Wenqing Chen
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonW1W 7TSUK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonWC1E 6AUUK
| | - Priyankan Datta
- Nanoengineered Systems LaboratoryMechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonWC1E 7JEUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonW1W 7TSUK
| | - Priya Gupta
- Nanoengineered Systems LaboratoryMechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonWC1E 7JEUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonW1W 7TSUK
| | - Anna L. David
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonW1W 7TSUK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonWC1E 6AUUK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLLondonW1T 7DNUK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonW1W 7TSUK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonWC1E 6AUUK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLLondonW1T 7DNUK
| | - Adrien Desjardins
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonW1W 7TSUK
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonWC1E 6BTUK
| | - Manish K. Tiwari
- Nanoengineered Systems LaboratoryMechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonWC1E 7JEUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonW1W 7TSUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Atkins B, Kindinger L, Mahindra MP, Moatti Z, Siassakos D. Stillbirth: prevention and supportive bereavement care. BMJ Med 2023; 2:e000262. [PMID: 37564829 PMCID: PMC10410959 DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
Around half of the two million stillbirths occurring worldwide each year are preventable. This review compiles the most up-to-date evidence to inform stillbirth prevention. Many general maternal health interventions also reduce the risk of stillbirth, for example, antenatal care attendance. This review focuses on specific aspects of care: glucose metabolism, targeted aspirin prophylaxis, clotting and immune disorders, sleep positions, fetal movement monitoring, and preconception and interconception health. In the past few years, covid-19 infection during pregnancy has emerged as a risk factor for stillbirth, particularly among women who were not vaccinated. Alongside prevention, efforts to address stillbirth must include provision of high quality, supportive, and compassionate bereavement care to improve parents' wellbeing. A growing body of evidence suggests beneficial effects for parents who received supportive care and were offered choices such as mode of birth and the option to see and hold their baby. Staff need support to be able to care for parents effectively, yet, studies consistently highlight the scarcity of specific bereavement care training for healthcare providers. Action is urgently needed and is possible. Action must be taken with the evidence available now, in healthcare settings with high or low resources, to reduce stillbirths and improve training and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Atkins
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, London, UK
| | - Lindsay Kindinger
- King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women Perth, Perth, WA, Australia
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jaufuraully S, Lakshmi Narasimhan A, Stott D, Attilakos G, Siassakos D. A systematic review of brachial plexus injuries after caesarean birth: challenging delivery? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:361. [PMID: 37198580 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05696-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caesarean section (CS) is widely perceived as protective against obstetric brachial plexus injury (BPI), but few studies acknowledge the factors associated with such injury. The objectives of this study were therefore to aggregate cases of BPI after CS, and to illuminate risk factors for BPI. METHODS Pubmed Central, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched using free text: ("brachial plexus injury" or "brachial plexus injuries" or "brachial plexus palsy" or "brachial plexus palsies" or "Erb's palsy" or "Erb's palsies" or "brachial plexus birth injury" or "brachial plexus birth palsy") and ("caesarean" or "cesarean" or "Zavanelli" or "cesarian" or "caesarian" or "shoulder dystocia"). Studies with clinical details of BPI after CS were included. Studies were assessed using the National Institutes for Healthy Study Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series, Cohort and Case-Control Studies. MAIN RESULTS 39 studies were eligible. 299 infants sustained BPI after CS. 53% of cases with BPI after CS had risk factors for likely challenging handling/manipulation of the fetus prior to delivery, in the presence of considerable maternal or fetal concerns, and/or in the presence of poor access due to obesity or adhesions. CONCLUSIONS In the presence of factors that would predispose to a challenging delivery, it is difficult to justify that BPI could occur due to in-utero, antepartum events alone. Surgeons should exercise care when operating on women with these risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shireen Jaufuraully
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
- Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Daniel Stott
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - George Attilakos
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bakhbakhi D, Siassakos D, Davies A, Merriel A, Barnard K, Stead E, Shakespeare C, Duffy JMN, Hinton L, McDowell K, Lyons A, Fraser A, Burden C. Interventions, outcomes and outcome measurement instruments in stillbirth care research: A systematic review to inform the development of a core outcome set. BJOG 2023; 130:560-576. [PMID: 36655361 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A core outcome set could address inconsistent outcome reporting and improve evidence for stillbirth care research, which have been identified as an important research priority. OBJECTIVES To identify outcomes and outcome measurement instruments reported by studies evaluating interventions after the diagnosis of a stillbirth. SEARCH STRATEGY Amed, BNI, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and WHO ICTRP from 1998 to August 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised and non-randomised comparative or non-comparative studies reporting a stillbirth care intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Interventions, outcomes reported, definitions and outcome measurement tools were extracted. MAIN RESULTS Forty randomised and 200 non-randomised studies were included. Fifty-eight different interventions were reported, labour and birth care (52 studies), hospital bereavement care (28 studies), clinical investigations (116 studies), care in a multiple pregnancy (2 studies), psychosocial support (28 studies) and care in a subsequent pregnancy (14 studies). A total of 391 unique outcomes were reported and organised into 14 outcome domains: labour and birth; postpartum; delivery of care; investigations; multiple pregnancy; mental health; emotional functioning; grief and bereavement; social functioning; relationship; whole person; subsequent pregnancy; subsequent children and siblings and economic. A total of 242 outcome measurement instruments were used, with 0-22 tools per outcome. CONCLUSIONS Heterogeneity in outcome reporting, outcome definition and measurement tools in care after stillbirth exists. Considerable research gaps on specific intervention types in stillbirth care were identified. A core outcome set is needed to standardise outcome collection and reporting for stillbirth care research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anna Davies
- Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Emma Stead
- Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Lisa Hinton
- THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Anna Lyons
- Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Parris D, Siassakos D. Access to skills in rotational Kielland forceps. BJOG 2023. [PMID: 37106380 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Parris
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Colley CS, Hutchinson JC, Whitten SM, Siassakos D, Sebire NJ, Hillman SL. Routine placental histopathology findings from women testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy: Retrospective cohort comparative study. BJOG 2023. [PMID: 37077035 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of maternal Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on placental histopathological findings in an unselected population and evaluate the potential effect on the fetus, including the possibility of vertical transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). DESIGN Retrospective cohort comparative study of placental histopathological findings in patients with COVID-19, compared with controls. SETTING During the COVID-19 pandemic, placentas were studied from women at University College Hospital London who reported and/or tested positive for COVID-19. POPULATION Of 10 508 deliveries, 369 (3.5%) women had COVID-19 during pregnancy, with placental histopathology available for 244 women. METHODS Retrospective review of maternal and neonatal characteristics, where placental analysis had been performed. This was compared with available, previously published, histopathological findings from placentas of unselected women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Frequency of placental histopathological findings and relevant clinical outcomes. RESULTS Histological abnormalities were reported in 117 of 244 (47.95%) cases, with the most common diagnosis being ascending maternal genital tract infection. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of most abnormalities compared with controls. There were four cases of COVID-19 placentitis (1.52%, 95% CI 0.04%-3.00%) and one possible congenital infection, with placental findings of acute maternal genital tract infection. The rate of fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM), at 4.5%, was higher compared with controls (p = 0.00044). CONCLUSIONS In most cases, placentas from pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus do not show a significantly increased frequency of pathology. Evidence for transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is lacking from this cohort. There is a need for further study into the association between FVM, infection and diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte S Colley
- University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - J Ciaran Hutchinson
- Great Ormond Street Hospital Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Sara M Whitten
- University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Neil J Sebire
- Great Ormond Street Hospital Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Sara L Hillman
- University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jaufuraully S, Salvadores Fernandez C, Bagchi B, Gupta P, Desjardins A, Siassakos D, David AL, Tiwari MK. Preventing stillbirth from obstructed labor: A sensorized, low-cost device to train in safer operative birth. Front Glob Womens Health 2023; 3:1039477. [PMID: 36793358 PMCID: PMC9922699 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.1039477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background 98% of stillbirths occur in low- and middle- income countries. Obstructed labor is a common cause for both neonatal and maternal mortality, with a lack of skilled birth attendants one of the main reasons for the reduction in operative vaginal birth, especially in low- and middle- income countries. We introduce a low cost, sensorized, wearable device for digital vaginal examination to facilitate accurate assessment of fetal position and force applied to the fetal head, to aid training in safe operative vaginal birth. Methods The device consists of flexible pressure/force sensors mounted onto the fingertips of a surgical glove. Phantoms of the neonatal head were developed to replicate sutures. An Obstetrician tested the device on the phantoms by performing a mock vaginal examination at full dilatation. Data was recorded and signals interpreted. Software was developed so that the glove can be used with a simple smartphone app. A patient and public involvement panel was consulted on the glove design and functionality. Results The sensors achieved a 20 Newton force range and a 0.1 Newton sensitivity, leading to 100% accuracy in detecting fetal sutures, including when different degrees of molding or caput were present. They also detected sutures and force applied with a second sterile surgical glove on top. The software developed allowed a force threshold to be set, alerting the clinician when excessive force is applied. Patient and public involvement panels welcomed the device with great enthusiasm. Feedback indicated that women would accept, and prefer, clinicians to use the device if it could improve safety and reduce the number of vaginal examinations required. Conclusion Under phantom conditions to simulate the fetal head in labor, the novel sensorized glove can accurately determine fetal sutures and provide real-time force readings, to support safer clinical training and practice in operative birth. The glove is low cost (approximately 1 USD). Software is being developed so fetal position and force readings can be displayed on a mobile phone. Although substantial steps in clinical translation are required, the glove has the potential to support efforts to reduce the number of stillbirths and maternal deaths secondary to obstructed labor in low- and -middle income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shireen Jaufuraully
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Correspondence: Shireen Jaufuraully Manish K. Tiwari
| | - Carmen Salvadores Fernandez
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Biswajoy Bagchi
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Priya Gupta
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adrien Desjardins
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna L. David
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), London, United Kingdom
| | - Manish K. Tiwari
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Nanoengineered Systems Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Correspondence: Shireen Jaufuraully Manish K. Tiwari
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jaufuraully S, Dromey B, Story L, David AL, Attilakos G, Siassakos D. Magnetic resonance imaging in late pregnancy to improve labour and delivery outcomes - a systematic literature review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:949. [PMID: 36536322 PMCID: PMC9761997 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05290-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft tissue visualisation which may be useful in late pregnancy to predict labour outcome and maternal/neonatal birth trauma. OBJECTIVE To study if MRI in late pregnancy can predict maternal and neonatal outcomes of labour and birth. METHODS Systematic review of studies that performed MRI in late pregnancy or immediately postpartum. Studies were included if they imaged maternal pelvic or neonatal structures and assessed birth outcome. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity of studies. RESULTS Eighteen studies were selected. Twelve studies explored the value of MRI pelvimetry measurement and its utility to predict cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) and vaginal breech birth. Four explored cervical imaging in predicting time interval to birth. Two imaged women in active labour and assessed mouldability of the fetal skull. No marker of CPD had both high sensitivity and specificity for predicting labour outcome. The fetal pelvic index yielded sensitivities between 59 and 60%, and specificities between 34 to 64%. Similarly, although the sensitivity of the cephalopelvic disproportion index in predicting labour outcome was high (85%), specificity was only 56%. In women with breech presentation, MRI was demonstrated to reduce the rates of emergency caesarean section from 35 to 19%, and allowed better selection of vaginal breech birth. Live birth studies showed that the fetal head undergoes a substantial degree of moulding and deformation during cephalic vaginal birth, which is not considered during pelvimetry. There are conflicting studies on the role of MRI in cervical imaging and predicting time interval to birth. CONCLUSION MRI is a promising imaging modality to assess aspects of CPD, yet no current marker of CPD accurately predicts labour outcome. With advances in MRI, it is hoped that novel methods can be developed to better identify individuals at risk of obstructed or pathological labour. Its role in exploring fetal head moulding as a marker of CPD should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shireen Jaufuraully
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK ,grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Brian Dromey
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK ,grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lisa Story
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK ,grid.425213.3Fetal Medicine Unit, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Anna L David
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK ,grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK ,grid.451056.30000 0001 2116 3923National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK
| | - George Attilakos
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK ,grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK ,grid.451056.30000 0001 2116 3923National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Siassakos D, Bourne I, Sebire N, Kindinger L, Whitten SM, Battaglino C. Abnormal placental villous maturity and dysregulated glucose metabolism: implications for stillbirth prevention. J Perinat Med 2022; 50:763-768. [PMID: 35357795 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the UK one in 250 pregnancies end in stillbirth. Abnormal placental villous maturation, commonly associated with gestational diabetes, is a risk factor for stillbirth. Histopathology reports of placental distal villous immaturity (DVI) are reported disproportionately in placentas from otherwise unexplained stillbirths in women without formal diagnosis of diabetes but with either clinical characteristics or risk factors for diabetes. This study aims to establish maternal factors associated with DVI in relation to stillbirth. METHODS Placental histopathology reports were reviewed for all pregnant women delivering at University College London Hospital between July 2018 to March 2020. Maternal characteristics and birth outcomes of those with DVI were compared to those with other placental lesions or abnormal villous maturation. RESULTS Of the 752 placental histopathology reports reviewed, 11 (1.5%) were reported as diagnostic of DVI. Eighty cases were sampled for clinical record analysis. All women with DVI had normal PAPP-A (>0.4 MoM), normal uterine artery Doppler studies (UtA-PI) and were normotensive throughout pregnancy. Nearly one in five babies (2/11, 18.5%) with DVI were stillborn and 70% had at least one high glucose test result in pregnancy despite no formal diagnosis of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that the mechanism underlying stillbirth in DVI likely relates to glucose dysmetabolism, not sufficient for diagnosis using current criteria for gestational diabetes, resulting in placental dysfunction that is not identifiable before the third trimester. Relying on conventional diabetes tests, foetal macrosomia or growth restriction, may not identify all pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes from glucose dysmetabolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Siassakos
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.,University College London Hospital (UCLH), London, UK.,UCLH National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.,Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Surgical and Interventional Sciences (WEISS), London, UK
| | - Isabella Bourne
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Neil Sebire
- Great Ormond Street Hospital Institute for Child Health, London, UK
| | | | - Sara Melissa Whitten
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.,University College London Hospital (UCLH), London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Norman JE, Lawton J, Stock SJ, Siassakos D, Norrie J, Hallowell N, Chowdhry S, Hart RI, Odd D, Brewin J, Culshaw L, Lee-Davey C, Tebbutt H, Whyte S. Feasibility and design of a trial regarding the optimal mode of delivery for preterm birth: the CASSAVA multiple methods study. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-102. [PMID: 34751645 DOI: 10.3310/hta25610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Around 60,000 babies are born preterm (prior to 37 weeks' gestation) each year in the UK. There is little evidence on the optimal birth mode (vaginal or caesarean section). OBJECTIVE The overall aim of the CASSAVA project was to determine if a trial to define the optimal mode of preterm birth could be carried out and, if so, determine what sort of trial could be conducted and how it could best be performed. We aimed to determine the specific groups of preterm women and babies for whom there are uncertainties about the best planned mode of birth, and if there would be willingness to recruit to, and participate in, a randomised trial to address some, but not all, of these uncertainties. This project was conducted in response to a Heath Technology Assessment programme commissioning call (17/22 'Mode of delivery for preterm infants'). METHODS We conducted clinician and patient surveys (n = 224 and n = 379, respectively) to identify current practice and opinion, and a consensus survey and Delphi workshop (n = 76 and n = 22 participants, respectively) to inform the design of a hypothetical clinical trial. The protocol for this clinical trial/vignette was used in telephone interviews with clinicians (n = 24) and in focus groups with potential participants (n = 13). RESULTS Planned sample size and data saturation was achieved for all groups except for focus groups with participants, as this had to be curtailed because of the COVID-19 pandemic and data saturation was not achieved. There was broad agreement from parents and health-care professionals that a trial is needed. The clinician survey demonstrated a variety of practice and opinion. The parent survey suggested that women and their families generally preferred vaginal birth at later gestations and caesarean section for preterm infants. The interactive workshop and Delphi consensus process confirmed the need for more evidence (hence the case for a trial) and provided rich information on what a future trial should entail. It was agreed that any trial should address the areas with most uncertainty, including the management of women at 26-32 weeks' gestation, with either spontaneous preterm labour (cephalic presentation) or where preterm birth was medically indicated. Clear themes around the challenges inherent in conducting any trial emerged, including the concept of equipoise itself. Specific issues were as follows: different clinicians and participants would be in equipoise for each clinical scenario, effective conduct of the trial would require appropriate resources and expertise within the hospital conducting the trial, potential participants would welcome information on the trial well before the onset of labour and minority ethnic groups would require tailored approaches. CONCLUSION Given the lack of evidence and the variation of practice and opinion in this area, and having listened to clinicians and potential participants, we conclude that a trial should be conducted and the outlined challenges resolved. FUTURE WORK The CASSAVA project could be used to inform the design of a randomised trial and indicates how such a trial could be carried out. Any future trial would benefit from a pilot with qualitative input and a study within a trial to inform optimal recruitment. LIMITATIONS Certainty that a trial could be conducted can be determined only when it is attempted. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12295730. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 61. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Norman
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Julia Lawton
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sarah J Stock
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nina Hallowell
- Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Ruth I Hart
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Odd
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Sonia Whyte
- Tommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li Y, Kurinczuk JJ, Gale C, Siassakos D, Carson C. Evidence of disparities in the provision of the maternal postpartum 6-week check in primary care in England, 2015-2018: an observational study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). J Epidemiol Community Health 2021; 76:239-246. [PMID: 34503988 PMCID: PMC8862061 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2021-216640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Background A maternal postpartum 6-week check (SWC) with a general practitioner (GP) is now considered an essential service in England, a recent policy change intended to improve women’s health. We aimed to provide an up-to-date snapshot of the prevalence of SWC prior to the policy change as a baseline, and to explore factors associated with having a late or no check. Methods We conducted a cohort study using primary care records in England (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)). 34 337 women who gave birth between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2018 and had ≥12 weeks of follow-up post partum were identified in the CPRD Pregnancy Register. The proportion who had evidence of an SWC with a GP was calculated, and regression analysis was used to assess the association between women’s characteristics and risks of a late or no check. Results Sixty-two per cent (95% CI 58% to 67%) of women had an SWC recorded at their GP practice within 12 weeks post partum, another 27% had other consultations. Forty per cent had an SWC at the recommended 6–8 weeks, 2% earlier and 20% later. A late or no check was more common among younger women, mothers of preterm babies or those registered in more deprived areas. Conclusions Nearly 40% of women did not have a postpartum SWC recorded. Provision or uptake was not equitable; younger women and those in more deprived areas were less likely to have a record of such check, suggesting postpartum care in general practice may be missing some women who need it most.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangmei Li
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jennifer J Kurinczuk
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher Gale
- Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London, UK
| | - Claire Carson
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Horey D, Boyle FM, Cassidy J, Cassidy PR, Erwich JJHM, Gold KJ, Gross MM, Heazell AEP, Leisher SH, Murphy M, Ravaldi C, Siassakos D, Storey C, Vannacci A, Wojcieszek A, Flenady V. Parents' experiences of care offered after stillbirth: An international online survey of high and middle-income countries. Birth 2021; 48:366-374. [PMID: 33738843 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stillbirth, the death of a baby before birth, is associated with significant psychological and social consequences that can be mitigated by respectful and supportive bereavement care. The absence of high-level evidence to support the broad scope of perinatal bereavement practices means that offering a range of options identified as valued by parents has become an important indicator of care quality. This study aimed to describe bereavement care practices offered to parents across different high-income and middle-income countries. METHODS An online survey of parents of stillborn babies was conducted between December 2014 and February 2015. Frequencies of nine practices were compared between high-income and middle-income countries. Differences in proportions of reported practices and their associated odds ratios were calculated to compare high-income and middle-income countries. RESULTS Over three thousand parents (3041) with a self-reported stillbirth in the preceding five years from 40 countries responded. Fifteen countries had atleast 40 responses. Significant differences in the prevalence of offering nine bereavement care practices were reported by women in high-income countries (HICs) compared with women in middle-income countries (MICs). All nine practices were reported to occur significantly more frequently by women in HICs, including opportunity to see and hold their baby (OR = 4.8, 95% CI 4.0-5.9). The widespread occurrence of all nine practices was reported only for The Netherlands. CONCLUSIONS Bereavement care after stillbirth varies between countries. Future research should look at why these differences occur, their impact on parents, and whether differences should be addressed, particularly how to support effective communication, decision-making, and follow-up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dell Horey
- College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic., Australia
| | - Frances M Boyle
- Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Mechthild M Gross
- Midwifery Research and Education Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Alexander E P Heazell
- Faculty of Biological, Obstetrics, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Medical and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Margaret Murphy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Claudia Ravaldi
- PeaRL Perinatal Research Laboratory, University of Florence, Prato, Italy
| | | | | | - Alfredo Vannacci
- Pharmacology and Toxicology, PeaRL Perinatal Research Laboratory, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - Aleena Wojcieszek
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Vicki Flenady
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hassan A, Meah VL, Davies GA, Davenport MH, Siassakos D. Modify, don't stop! Time to reconsider the 'relative' and 'absolute' contraindications to physical activity in pregnancy: an opinion piece. BJOG 2021; 129:331-335. [PMID: 34455691 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Hassan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - V L Meah
- Program for Pregnancy and Postpartum Health, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - G A Davies
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - M H Davenport
- Program for Pregnancy and Postpartum Health, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - D Siassakos
- Faculty of Population Health Sciences, Maternal & Fetal Medicine, University College London EGA Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Burden C, Bakhbakhi D, Heazell AE, Lynch M, Timlin L, Bevan C, Storey C, Kurinczuk JJ, Siassakos D. Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044563. [PMID: 33727271 PMCID: PMC7970278 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE When a formal review of care takes places after the death of a baby, parents are largely unaware it takes place and are often not meaningfully involved in the review process. Parent engagement in the process is likely to be essential for a successful review and to improve patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate an intervention process of parental engagement in perinatal mortality review (PNMR) and to identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation. DESIGN Mixed-methods study of parents' engagement in PNMR. SETTING Single tertiary maternity unit in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Bereaved parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs). INTERVENTIONS Parent engagement in the PNMR (intervention) was based on principles derived through national consensus and qualitative research with parents, HCPs and stakeholders in the UK. OUTCOMES Recruitment rates, bereaved parents and HCPs' perceptions. RESULTS Eighty-one per cent of bereaved parents approached (13/16) agreed to participate in the study. Two focus groups with bereaved parents (n=11) and HCP (n=7) were carried out postimplementation to investigate their perceptions of the process.Overarching findings were improved dialogue and continuity of care with parents, and improvements in the PNMR process and patient safety. Bereaved parents agreed that engagement in the PNMR process was invaluable and helped them in their grieving. HCP perceived that parent involvement improved the review process and lessons learnt from the deaths; information to understand the impact of aspects of care on the baby's death were often only found in the parents' recollections. CONCLUSIONS Parental engagement in the PNMR process is achievable and useful for parents and HCP alike, and critically can improve patient safety and future care for mothers and babies. To learn and prevent perinatal deaths effectively, all hospitals should give parents the option to engage with the review of their baby's death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christy Burden
- Bristol Medical School, Department of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Danya Bakhbakhi
- Bristol Medical School, Department of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Mary Lynch
- Bristol Medical School, Department of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura Timlin
- Bristol Medical School, Department of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- University College London Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
- University College London Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome EPSRC centre for Interventional + Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London, UK
- NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cornthwaite K, Prajapati C, Lenguerrand E, Knight M, Blencowe N, Johnson A, Draycott T, Siassakos D. Pregnancy outcomes following different types of bariatric surgery: A national cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 260:10-17. [PMID: 33706225 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of type of bariatric surgery on pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN This is a national prospective observational study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS). Data collection was undertaken in 200 consultant-led NHS maternity units between November 2011 and October 2012 (gastric banding), and April 2014 and March 2016 (gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy). Participants were pregnant women following gastric banding (n = 127), gastric bypass (n = 134) and sleeve gastrectomy (n = 29). Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared using generalised linear and linear mixed models. Maternal outcomes included gestational weight gain, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, anaemia, surgical complications. Perinatal outcomes included birthweight, small/large for gestational age (SGA/LGA), preterm birth, stillbirth. RESULTS Maternal: Women pregnant after gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy had a lower risk of anaemia compared with gastric bypass (banding (16 %) vs bypass (39 %): p = 0.002, sleeve (21 %) vs bypass: p = 0.04). Gestational diabetes risk was lower after gastric banding compared with gastric bypass (7 % vs 16 %, p = 0.03) despite women with banding having significantly greater weight at booking as well as gestational weight gain. Women pregnant after gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy had a lower risk of surgical complications than after gastric bypass (banding (0.9 %) vs bypass (11.4 %): p = 0.03, sleeve (0.0 %) vs bypass: p = 0.06). Perinatal: Infants born to mothers after gastric banding had a higher birthweight than those born to mothers after gastric bypass (mean difference = 260 g (125-395), p < 0.001). Infants were more likely to be LGA if their mothers had gastric banding compared with gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy (banding (21 %) vs bypass (5 %): p = 0.006; banding vs sleeve (3 %): p = 0.03). Risk of preterm birth was higher in women with gastric banding compared with gastric bypass (13 % vs 8 %, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Women planning bariatric surgery should be counselled regarding the differing impacts of different types of procedure on any future pregnancy. Pre-existing gastric bypass is associated with higher rates of potentially serious surgical complications during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Cornthwaite
- Women's Health Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, UK; Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.
| | | | | | - Marian Knight
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, UK
| | | | - Andrew Johnson
- Diabetes and Endocrinology Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, UK
| | - Tim Draycott
- Women's Health Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Elizabeth Garett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospital, UK; Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Surgical and Interventional Sciences (WEISS), UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van der Nelson H, O'Brien S, Burnard S, Mayer M, Alvarez M, Knowlden J, Winter C, Dailami N, Marques E, Burden C, Siassakos D, Draycott T. Intramuscular oxytocin versus Syntometrine ® versus carbetocin for prevention of primary postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a randomised double-blinded clinical trial of effectiveness, side effects and quality of life. BJOG 2021; 128:1236-1246. [PMID: 33300296 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare intramuscular oxytocin, Syntometrine® and carbetocin for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth. DESIGN Randomised double-blinded clinical trial. SETTING Six hospitals in England. POPULATION A total of 5929 normotensive women having a singleton vaginal birth. METHODS Randomisation when birth was imminent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary: use of additional uterotonic agents. Secondary: weighed blood loss, transfusion, manual removal of placenta, adverse effects, quality of life. RESULTS Participants receiving additional uterotonics: 368 (19.5%) oxytocin, 298 (15.6%) Syntometrine and 364 (19.1%) carbetocin. When pairwise comparisons were made: women receiving carbetocin were significantly more likely to receive additional uterotonics than those receiving Syntometrine (odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.51, P = 0.004); the difference between carbetocin and oxytocin was non-significant (P = 0.78); Participants receiving Syntometrine were significantly less likely to receive additional uterotonics than those receiving oxytocin (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.91, P = 0.002). Non-inferiority between carbetocin and Syntometrine was not shown. Use of Syntometrine reduced non-drug PPH treatments compared with oxytocin (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.97) but not carbetocin (P = 0.64). Rates of PPH and blood transfusion were not different. Syntometrine was associated with an increase in maternal adverse effects and reduced ability of the mother to bond with her baby. CONCLUSIONS Non-inferiority of carbetocin to Syntometrine was not shown. Carbetocin is not significantly different to oxytocin for use of additional uterotonics. Use of Syntometrine reduced use of additional uterotonics and need for non-drug PPH treatments compared with oxytocin. Increased maternal adverse effects are a disadvantage of Syntometrine. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT IM carbetocin does not reduce additional uterotonic use compared with IM Syntometrine or oxytocin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H van der Nelson
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.,University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - S O'Brien
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.,University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - S Burnard
- Royal United Hospitals NHS Trust, Bath, UK
| | - M Mayer
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - M Alvarez
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - C Winter
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - N Dailami
- University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - E Marques
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - C Burden
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.,University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Boyle FM, Horey D, Siassakos D, Burden C, Bakhbakhi D, Silver RM, Flenady V. Parent engagement in perinatal mortality reviews: an online survey of clinicians from six high-income countries. BJOG 2020; 128:696-703. [PMID: 32959539 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Parent engagement in perinatal mortality review meetings following stillbirth may benefit parents and improve patient safety. We investigated perinatal mortality review meeting practices, including the extent of parent engagement, based on self-reports from healthcare professionals from maternity care facilities in six high-income countries. DESIGN Cross-sectional online survey. SETTING Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, UK and USA. POPULATION A total of 1104 healthcare professionals, comprising mainly obstetricians, gynaecologists, midwives and nurses. METHODS Data were drawn from responses to a survey covering stillbirth-related topics. Open- and closed-items that focused on 'Data quality on causes of stillbirth' were analysed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Healthcare professionals' self-reported practices around perinatal mortality review meetings following stillbirth. RESULTS Most clinicians (81.0%) were aware of regular audit meetings to review stillbirth at their maternity facility, although this was true for only 35.5% of US respondents. For the 854 respondents whose facility held regular meetings, less than a third (31.1%) reported some form of parent engagement, and this was usually in the form of one-way post-meeting feedback. Across all six countries, only 17.1% of respondents described an explicit approach where parents provided input, received feedback and were represented at meetings. CONCLUSIONS We found no established practice of involving parents in the perinatal mortality review process in six high-income countries. Parent engagement may hold the key to important lessons for stillbirth prevention and care. Further understanding of approaches, barriers and enablers is warranted. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Parent engagement in mortality review after stillbirth is rare, based on data from six countries. We need to understand the barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F M Boyle
- Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth (Stillbirth CRE), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - D Horey
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth (Stillbirth CRE), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Siassakos
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - C Burden
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - D Bakhbakhi
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R M Silver
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - V Flenady
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth (Stillbirth CRE), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Reeves BC, Rooshenas L, Macefield RC, Woodward M, Welton NJ, Waterhouse BR, Torrance AD, Strong S, Siassakos D, Seligman W, Rogers CA, Rickard L, Pullyblank A, Pope C, Pinkney TD, Pathak S, Owais A, O'Callaghan J, O'Brien S, Nepogodiev D, Nadi K, Murkin CE, Munder T, Milne T, Messenger D, McMullan CM, Mathers JM, Mason M, Marshall M, Lovegrove R, Longman RJ, Lloyd J, Lim J, Lee K, Korwar V, Hughes D, Hill G, Harris R, Hamdan M, Brown HG, Gooberman-Hill R, Glasbey J, Fryer C, Ellis L, Elliott D, Dumville JC, Draycott T, Donovan JL, Cotton D, Coast J, Clout M, Calvert MJ, Byrne BE, Brown OD, Blencowe NS, Bera KD, Bennett J, Bamford R, Bakhbakhi D, Atif M, Ashton K, Armstrong E, Andronis L, Ananthavarathan P, Blazeby JM. Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-166. [PMID: 31392958 DOI: 10.3310/hta23390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site infection (SSI) affects up to 20% of people with a primary closed wound after surgery. Wound dressings may reduce SSI. OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dressing types or no dressing to reduce SSI in primary surgical wounds. DESIGN Phase A - semistructured interviews, outcome measure development, practice survey, literature reviews and value-of-information analysis. Phase B - pilot RCT with qualitative research and questionnaire validation. Patients and the public were involved. SETTING Usual NHS care. PARTICIPANTS Patients undergoing elective/non-elective abdominal surgery, including caesarean section. INTERVENTIONS Phase A - none. Phase B - simple dressing, glue-as-a-dressing (tissue adhesive) or 'no dressing'. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Phase A - pilot RCT design; SSI, patient experience and wound management questionnaires; dressing practices; and value-of-information of a RCT. Phase B - participants screened, proportions consented/randomised; acceptability of interventions; adherence; retention; validity and reliability of SSI measure; and cost drivers. DATA SOURCES Phase A - interviews with patients and health-care professionals (HCPs), narrative data from published RCTs and data about dressing practices. Phase B - participants and HCPs in five hospitals. RESULTS Phase A - we interviewed 102 participants. HCPs interpreted 'dressing' variably and reported using available products. HCPs suggested practical/clinical reasons for dressing use, acknowledged the weak evidence base and felt that a RCT including a 'no dressing' group was acceptable. A survey showed that 68% of 1769 wounds (727 participants) had simple dressings and 27% had glue-as-a-dressing. Dressings were used similarly in elective and non-elective surgery. The SSI questionnaire was developed from a content analysis of existing SSI tools and interviews, yielding 19 domains and 16 items. A main RCT would be valuable to the NHS at a willingness to pay of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Phase B - from 4 March 2016 to 30 November 2016, we approached 862 patients for the pilot RCT; 81.1% were eligible, 59.4% consented and 394 were randomised (simple, n = 133; glue, n = 129; no dressing, n = 132); non-adherence was 3 out of 133, 8 out of 129 and 20 out of 132, respectively. SSI occurred in 51 out of 281 participants. We interviewed 55 participants. All dressing strategies were acceptable to stakeholders, with no indication that adherence was problematic. Adherence aids and patients' understanding of their allocated dressing appeared to be key. The SSI questionnaire response rate overall was 67.2%. Items in the SSI questionnaire fitted a single scale, which had good reliability (test-retest and Cronbach's alpha of > 0.7) and diagnostic accuracy (c-statistic = 0.906). The key cost drivers were hospital appointments, dressings and redressings, use of new medicines and primary care appointments. LIMITATIONS Multiple activities, often in parallel, were challenging to co-ordinate. An amendment took 4 months, restricting recruitment to the pilot RCT. Only 67% of participants completed the SSI questionnaire. We could not implement photography in theatres. CONCLUSIONS A main RCT of dressing strategies is feasible and would be valuable to the NHS. The SSI questionnaire is sufficiently accurate to be used as the primary outcome. A main trial with three groups (as in the pilot) would be valuable to the NHS, using a primary outcome of SSI at discharge and patient-reported SSI symptoms at 4-8 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION Phase A - Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN06792113; Phase B - Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN49328913. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 39. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Funding was also provided by the Medical Research Council ConDuCT-II Hub (reference number MR/K025643/1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barnaby C Reeves
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rhiannon C Macefield
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mark Woodward
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicky J Welton
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Andrew D Torrance
- Department of Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Sean Strong
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Chris A Rogers
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lloyd Rickard
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Caroline Pope
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Thomas D Pinkney
- Academic Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samir Pathak
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Anwar Owais
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Dmitri Nepogodiev
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Academic Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Charlotte E Murkin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Tonia Munder
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Tom Milne
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - David Messenger
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Christel M McMullan
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jonathan M Mathers
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthew Mason
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey Lim
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Kathryn Lee
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Daniel Hughes
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Rosie Harris
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mohammed Hamdan
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Rachael Gooberman-Hill
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - James Glasbey
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Caroline Fryer
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lucy Ellis
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Daisy Elliott
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jo C Dumville
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Jenny L Donovan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - David Cotton
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanna Coast
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Madeleine Clout
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Benjamin E Byrne
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Oliver D Brown
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Natalie S Blencowe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Katarzyna D Bera
- Clinical Academic Graduate School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Richard Bamford
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Muhammad Atif
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Kate Ashton
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Lazaros Andronis
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jane M Blazeby
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bampoe S, Lucas DN, Neall G, Sceales P, Aggarwal R, Caulfield K, Siassakos D, Odor PM. A cross-sectional study of immune seroconversion to SARS-CoV-2 in frontline maternity health professionals. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1614-1619. [PMID: 32777861 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
COVID-19, the respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, is thought to cause a milder illness in pregnancy with a greater proportion of asymptomatic carriers. This has important implications for the risk of patient-to-staff, staff-to-staff and staff-to-patient transmission among health professionals in maternity units. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of previously undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection in health professionals from two tertiary-level maternity units in London, UK, and to determine associations between healthcare workers' characteristics, reported symptoms and serological evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. In total, 200 anaesthetists, midwives and obstetricians, with no previously confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, were tested for immune seroconversion using laboratory IgG assays. Comprehensive symptom and medical histories were also collected. Five out of 40 (12.5%; 95%CI 4.2-26.8%) anaesthetists, 7/52 (13.5%; 95%CI 5.6-25.8%) obstetricians and 17/108 (15.7%; 95%CI 9.5-24.0%) midwives were seropositive, with an overall total of 29/200 (14.5%; 95%CI 9.9-20.1%) of maternity healthcare workers testing positive for IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Of those who had seroconverted, 10/29 (35.5%) were completely asymptomatic. Fever or cough were only present in 6/29 (21%) and 10/29 (35%) respectively. Anosmia was the most common symptom occurring in 15/29 (52%) seropositive participants and was the only symptom that was predictive of positive seroconversion (OR 18; 95%CI 6-55). Of those who were seropositive, 59% had not self-isolated at any point and continued to provide patient care in the hospital setting. This is the largest study of baseline immune seroconversion in maternity healthcare workers conducted to date and reveals that one out of six were seropositive, of whom one out of three were asymptomatic. This has significant implications for the risk of occupational transmission of SARS-CoV-2 for both staff and patients in maternity units. Regular testing of staff, including asymptomatic staff should be considered to reduce transmission risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bampoe
- Centre for Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University College London, London, UK.,University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - G Neall
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Sceales
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Aggarwal
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Caulfield
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Siassakos
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,University College London, UK
| | - P M Odor
- Centre for Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University College London, London, UK.,University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Cornish
- UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cornish EF, Wisentaner A, Siassakos D. Unprecedently high rates of gestational diabetes in women with body mass index ≥40kg/m 2 at booking: A retrospective UK cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 247:267-268. [PMID: 32111409 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E F Cornish
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London (UCL), UK.
| | - A Wisentaner
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, UK
| | - D Siassakos
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London (UCL), UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Shakespeare C, Merriel A, Bakhbakhi D, Blencowe H, Boyle FM, Flenady V, Gold K, Horey D, Lynch M, Mills TA, Murphy MM, Storey C, Toolan M, Siassakos D, Abdul‐Mumin A, Abuladze M, Boyle F, Cassidy J, Cronin R, Dahlstrom J, Erwich JJ, Nuzum D, O’Donoghue K, Pollock D, Sacks E, Sexton J, Warland J, Wimmer L, Wojcieszek A. The
RESPECT
Study for consensus on global bereavement care after stillbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 149:137-147. [DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Shakespeare
- Department of Women and Children's Health School of Population Health sciences Bristol Medical School The Chilterns Southmead Hospital University of Bristol Bristol UK
| | - Abi Merriel
- Department of Women and Children's Health School of Population Health sciences Bristol Medical School The Chilterns Southmead Hospital University of Bristol Bristol UK
| | - Danya Bakhbakhi
- Department of Women and Children's Health School of Population Health sciences Bristol Medical School The Chilterns Southmead Hospital University of Bristol Bristol UK
| | - Hannah Blencowe
- Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH) Centre London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK
| | - Frances M. Boyle
- Stillbirth Centre for Research Excellence Mater Research Institute University of Queensland Brisbane Australia
| | - Vicki Flenady
- Stillbirth Centre for Research Excellence Mater Research Institute University of Queensland Brisbane Australia
| | - Katherine Gold
- Department of Family Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
| | - Dell Horey
- Stillbirth Centre for Research Excellence Mater Research Institute University of Queensland Brisbane Australia
| | - Mary Lynch
- Department of Women and Children's Health School of Population Health sciences Bristol Medical School The Chilterns Southmead Hospital University of Bristol Bristol UK
| | - Tracey A. Mills
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work University of Manchester Manchester UK
| | | | | | - Miriam Toolan
- Department of Women and Children's Health School of Population Health sciences Bristol Medical School The Chilterns Southmead Hospital University of Bristol Bristol UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Silver RM, Siassakos D, Dudley DJ. The enemy of the good in assigning cause of fetal death. BJOG 2020; 127:536. [PMID: 31880045 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R M Silver
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - D J Dudley
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cooper N, O'Brien S, Siassakos D. Training health workers to prevent and manage post-partum haemorrhage (PPH). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 61:121-129. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
33
|
Merriel A, Ficquet J, Barnard K, Kunutsor SK, Soar J, Lenguerrand E, Caldwell DM, Burden C, Winter C, Draycott T, Siassakos D. The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life-threatening emergencies in hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 9:CD012177. [PMID: 31549741 PMCID: PMC6757513 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012177.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preparing healthcare providers to manage relatively rare life-threatening emergency situations effectively is a challenge. Training sessions enable staff to rehearse for these events and are recommended by several reports and guidelines. In this review we have focused on interactive training, this includes any element where the training is not solely didactic but provides opportunity for discussions, rehearsals, or interaction with faculty or technology. It is important to understand the effective methods and essential elements for successful emergency training so that resources can be appropriately targeted to improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life-threatening emergencies in hospital on patient outcomes, clinical care practices, or organisational practices, and to identify essential components of effective interactive emergency training programmes. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and ERIC and two trials registers up to 11 March 2019. We searched references of included studies, conference proceedings, and contacted study authors. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised trials and cluster-randomised trials comparing interactive training for emergency situations with standard/no training. We defined emergency situations as those in which immediate lifesaving action is required, for example cardiac arrests and major haemorrhage. We included all studies where healthcare workers involved in providing direct clinical care were participants. We excluded studies outside of a hospital setting or where the intervention was not targeted at practicing healthcare workers. We included trials irrespective of publication status, date, and language. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of each included trial. Due to the small number of studies and the heterogeneity in outcome measures, we were unable to perform the planned meta-analysis. We provide a structured synthesis for the following outcomes: survival to hospital discharge, morbidity rate, protocol or guideline adherence, patient outcomes, clinical practice outcomes, and organisation-of-care outcomes. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of the evidence and the strength of recommendations for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We included 11 studies that reported on 2000 healthcare providers and over 300,000 patients; one study did not report the number of participants. Seven were cluster randomised trials and four were single centre studies. Four studies focused on obstetric training, three on obstetric and neonatal care, two on neonatal training, one on trauma and one on general resuscitations. The studies were spread across high-, middle- and low-income settings.Interactive training may make little or no difference in survival to hospital discharge for patients requiring resuscitation (1 study; 30 participants; 98 events; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain if emergency training changes morbidity rate, as the certainty of the evidence is very low (3 studies; 1778 participants; 57,193 patients, when reported). We are uncertain if training alters healthcare providers' adherence to clinical protocols or guidelines, as the certainty of the evidence is very low (3 studies; 156 participants; 558 patients). We are uncertain if there were improvements in patient outcomes following interactive training for emergency situations, as we assessed the evidence as very low-certainty (5 studies, 951 participants; 314,055 patients). We are uncertain if training for emergency situations improves clinical practice outcomes as the certainty of the evidence is very low (4 studies; 1417 participants; 28,676 patients, when reported). Two studies reported organisation-of-care outcomes, we are uncertain if interactive emergency training has any effect on this outcome as the certainty of the evidence is very low (634 participants; 179,400 patient population).We examined prespecified subgroups and found no clear commonalities in effect of multidisciplinary training, location of training, duration of the course, or duration of follow-up. We also examined areas arising from the studies including focus of training, proportion of staff trained, leadership of intervention, and incentive/trigger to participate, and again identified no clear mediating factors. The sources of funding for the studies were governmental, local organisations, or philanthropic donors. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We are uncertain if there are any benefits of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life-threatening emergencies in hospital as the certainty of the evidence is very low. We were unable to identify any factors that may have allowed us to identify an essential element of these interactive training courses.We found a lack of consistent reporting, which contributed to the inability to meta-analyse across specialities. More trials are required to build the evidence base for the optimum way to prepare healthcare providers for rare life-threatening emergency events. These trials need to be conducted with attention to outcomes important to patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It is vitally important to develop high-quality studies adequately powered and with attention to minimising the risk of bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abi Merriel
- University of BristolPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolDepartment of Women's and Children's HealthThe ChilternsBristolUKBS10 5NB
| | - Jo Ficquet
- Royal United Hospital NHS Foundation TrustWomen and Children's DivisionCoombe ParkBathUKBA1 3NG
| | - Katie Barnard
- North Bristol TrustLearning and Research, Southmead HospitalBristolUKBS10 5NB
| | - Setor K Kunutsor
- University of BristolTranslational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolBristolUK
| | - Jasmeet Soar
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead HospitalAnaesthetic DepartmentBristolUKBS10 5NB
| | - Erik Lenguerrand
- University of BristolTranslational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolBristolUK
| | - Deborah M Caldwell
- University of BristolPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolDepartment of Women's and Children's HealthThe ChilternsBristolUKBS10 5NB
| | - Christy Burden
- University of BristolPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolDepartment of Women's and Children's HealthThe ChilternsBristolUKBS10 5NB
| | - Cathy Winter
- North Bristol NHS TrustDepartment of Women's HealthBristolUK
| | - Tim Draycott
- North Bristol NHS TrustDepartment of Women's HealthBristolUK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- University College LondonUCL EGA Institute for Women's Health86‐96 Chenies MewsBloomsburyLondonUKWC1E 6HX
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bakhbakhi D, Siassakos D, Lynch M, Timlin L, Storey C, Heazell A, Burden C. PARENTS 2 study: consensus report for parental engagement in the perinatal mortality review process. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54:215-224. [PMID: 30294945 PMCID: PMC6772129 DOI: 10.1002/uog.20139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Revised: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The PARENTS 1 study (Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death) found that parents would endorse the opportunity to give feedback into the perinatal mortality review (PNMR) process. In subsequent focus groups, healthcare professionals were positive about parental engagement, although they considered that there may be significant challenges. The objective of this study was to develop core principles and recommendations for parental engagement in PNMR in the UK. METHODS A two-round Delphi technique was followed to reach consensus on core principles for parental engagement in the PNMR process; Round 1 included a national consensus workshop and Round 2 an online questionnaire. The consensus meeting was attended by a national panel of stakeholders (clinical and academic experts, parent advocates, managers and commissioners) in stillbirth and neonatal and bereavement care. To develop recommendations for parental engagement, participants discussed four key areas comprising: communication with parents, including receiving feedback; the format of the PNMR meeting; the parental engagement pathway; and challenging aspects of engaging with parents in reviews. Content analysis was conducted to generate recommendations from the meeting for a subsequent anonymous web-based survey. Attendees of the consensus workshop and members of the PARENTS 2 Project Advisory Board were asked to rank recommendations using a 9-point Likert scale from 1 (not important) to 9 (critically important). It had been agreed a priori, in compliance with established Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, that 'consensus' would be achieved if over 70% of participants scored the principle as 'critical' (score of 7-9) and fewer than 15% scored the principle as 'not important' (score of 1-3). Principles for which consensus was achieved were included in the core recommendations. RESULTS Of the 29 invited stakeholders, 22 participated in the consensus meeting and 25 (86% response rate) in the subsequent online questionnaire in June 2017. Consensus was agreed on 12 core principles. Of the 25 participants, 96% agreed that a face-to-face explanation of the PNMR process was of critical importance, 72% considered that parents should be offered the opportunity to nominate a suitable advocate, 92% believed that responses to parents' comments should be formally documented, 96% indicated that it was vital for action plans to be translated into lessons learnt and that this process should be monitored, and 100% of stakeholders voted that a plain-English summary should be produced for the parents following the meeting. There was good agreement on a further seven principles. CONCLUSIONS Key national stakeholders were unanimously supportive of parental engagement in the PNMR process and agreed on core principles to make this process feasible, meaningful and robust. A 6-month pilot of parental engagement in the PNMR process (PARENTS 2 study) in two UK units took place after the consensus on core principles. In collaboration with the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, the findings will inform the national standardized PNMR tool. © 2018 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Bakhbakhi
- Centre for Academic Women's HealthUniversity of Bristol, Chilterns, Women's Health, Southmead HospitalBristol, UK
| | - D. Siassakos
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - M. Lynch
- North Bristol NHS TrustWestbury on TrymBristolUK
| | - L. Timlin
- North Bristol NHS TrustWestbury on TrymBristolUK
| | | | - A. Heazell
- Manchester Academic Health Science CentreThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - C. Burden
- Centre for Academic Women's HealthUniversity of Bristol, Chilterns, Women's Health, Southmead HospitalBristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lenguerrand E, Winter C, Siassakos D, MacLennan G, Innes K, Lynch P, Cameron A, Crofts J, McDonald A, McCormack K, Forrest M, Norrie J, Bhattacharya S, Draycott T. Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf 2019; 29:122-134. [PMID: 31302601 PMCID: PMC7045781 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether the implementation of an intrapartum training package (PROMPT (PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training)) across a health service reduced the proportion of term babies born with Apgar score <7 at 5 min (<75mins). DESIGN Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING Twelve randomised maternity units with ≥900 births/year in Scotland. Three additional units were included in a supplementary analysis to assess the effect across Scotland. The intervention commenced in March 2014 with follow-up until September 2016. INTERVENTION The PROMPT training package (Second edition), with subsequent unit-level implementation of PROMPT courses for all maternity staff. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the proportion of term babies with Apgar<75mins. RESULTS 87 204 eligible births (99.2% with an Apgar score), of which 1291 infants had an Apgar<75mins were delivered in the 12 randomised maternity units. Two units did not implement the intervention. The overall Apgar<75mins rate observed in the 12 randomised units was 1.49%, increasing from 1.32% preintervention to 1.59% postintervention. Once adjusted for a secular time trend, the 'intention-to-treat' analysis indicated a moderate but non-significant reduction in the rate of term babies with an Apgar scores <75mins following PROMPT training (OR=0.79 95%CI(0.63 to 1.01)). However, some units implemented the intervention earlier than their allocated step, whereas others delayed the intervention. The content and authenticity of the implemented intervention varied widely at unit level. When the actual date of implementation of the intervention in each unit was considered in the analysis, there was no evidence of improvement (OR=1.01 (0.84 to 1.22)). No intervention effect was detected by broadening the analysis to include all 15 large Scottish maternity units. Units with a history of higher rates of Apgar<75mins maintained higher Apgar rates during the study (OR=2.09 (1.28 to 3.41)) compared with units with pre-study rates aligned to the national rate. CONCLUSIONS PROMPT training, as implemented, had no effect on the rate of Apgar <75mins in Scotland during the study period. Local implementation at scale was found to be more difficult than anticipated. Further research is required to understand why the positive effects observed in other single-unit studies have not been replicated in Scottish maternity units, and how units can be best supported to locally implement the intervention authentically and effectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN11640515.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Lenguerrand
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Cathy Winter
- Department of Women's Health and Children's Health, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
| | | | - Graeme MacLennan
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Karen Innes
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Pauline Lynch
- Maternity Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - Alan Cameron
- Ian Donald Fetal Medicine Centre, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Joanna Crofts
- Department of Women's Health and Children's Health, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
| | - Alison McDonald
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kirsty McCormack
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mark Forrest
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Tim Draycott
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Women's Health and Children's Health, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
O'Brien S, Lenguerrand E, Jordan S, Cornthwaite K, Burden C, Timlin L, Siassakos D. Simulation TRaining for Operative vaginal Birth Evaluation: study protocol for an observational stepped-wedge interrupted time-series study (STROBE). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:109. [PMID: 30940102 PMCID: PMC6444670 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2222-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Operative vaginal birth is a common procedure used to expedite birth after full cervical dilatation where there is a clinical need to do so (15% of births in the UK in 2016). The acquisition of skills for operative vaginal birth is dependent on the exposure of junior obstetricians to situations in which they can undertake directly supervised learning from senior accouchers. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has recently introduced the first structured course in operative vaginal birth. To date, there have been no attempts to determine the clinical impact of a structured training package for operative vaginal birth. Methods The STROBE study is a quasi-experimental before-after interrupted time-series study of the effect of simulation training in operative vaginal birth for obstetricians on clinical outcomes of women and babies following operative vaginal birth. Similar to a stepped-wedge design, the intervention will be gradually implemented in all participating units but at different time periods. The primary outcome is failed operative vaginal birth with the first intended instrument. Secondary maternal outcomes are; use of second instrument to achieve operative vaginal birth, caesarean section, episiotomy, perineal trauma (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th degree tear), cervical tear requiring suturing, general anaesthesia and estimated blood loss. Secondary neonatal outcomes are; Apgar score at one, five, and ten minutes, Umbilical artery pH, shoulder dystocia, admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and death within 28 days of birth. The analysis will be intention-to-treat (per unit) on the primary and secondary outcomes. The STROBE study received approval from the Health Research Authority and is sponsored by North Bristol NHS Trust. Results will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed medical journal within one year of completion of data gathering. Discussion The STROBE study will help establish our understanding of the effectiveness of locally-delivered simulation training for operative vaginal birth. Robust evidence supporting the effectiveness of such an approach would add weight to the argument supporting regular, local training for junior obstetricians in operative vaginal birth. Trial registration ISRCTN11760611 05/03/2018 (retrospectively registered). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2222-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen O'Brien
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. .,Women & Children's Directorate, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
| | - Erik Lenguerrand
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Sharon Jordan
- Women & Children's Directorate, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Katie Cornthwaite
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.,Women & Children's Directorate, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Christy Burden
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.,Women & Children's Directorate, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura Timlin
- Research & Innovation, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.,Women & Children's Directorate, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bakhbakhi D, Burden C, Storey C, Heazell AE, Lynch M, Timlin L, Gold K, Siassakos D. PARENTS 2 Study: a qualitative study of the views of healthcare professionals and stakeholders on parental engagement in the perinatal mortality review-from 'bottom of the pile' to joint learning. BMJ Open 2019; 8:e023792. [PMID: 30798293 PMCID: PMC6278809 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Engaging bereaved parents in the review process that examines their care before and after a perinatal death might help parents deal with their grief more effectively and drive improvements in patient safety. The objective of this study is to explore whether healthcare professionals would accept or support parent engagement in the perinatal mortality review process. DESIGN Qualitative focus group interviews. Transcripts were analysed with an inductive thematic approach. SETTING Two geographically distinct tertiary maternity hospitals in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Five focus groups were conducted with clinical staff including midwives, obstetricians, neonatologists, nursing staff and chaplaincy services. RESULTS Twenty-seven healthcare professionals unanimously agreed that parents' involvement in the perinatal mortality review process is useful and necessary. Six key themes emerged including: parental engagement; need for formal follow-up; critical structure of perinatal mortality review meeting; coordination and streamlining of care; advocacy for parents including role of the bereavement care lead; and requirement for training and support for staff to enable parental engagement. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare professionals strongly advocated engaging bereaved parents in the perinatal mortality review: empowering parents to ask questions, providing feedback on care, helping generate lessons and providing them with the opportunity to discuss a summary of the review conclusions with their primary healthcare professional contact. The participants agreed it is time to move on from 'a group of doctors reviewing notes' to active learning and improvement together with parents, to enable better care and prevention of perinatal death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya Bakhbakhi
- Centre for Academic Women’s Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Women’s Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Christy Burden
- Centre for Academic Women’s Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Women’s Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Alexander Edward Heazell
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biological, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary’s Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mary Lynch
- Centre for Academic Women’s Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Women’s Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura Timlin
- Centre for Academic Women’s Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Women’s Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Katherine Gold
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Centre for Academic Women’s Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Women’s Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hillman SL, Cooper NC, Siassakos D. Born to survive: A critical review of out-of-hospital maternal cardiac arrests and pre-hospital perimortem caesarean section. Resuscitation 2019; 135:224-225. [PMID: 30599181 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S L Hillman
- University College London & University College Hospital, EGA Wing, 25 Grafton Way, London WC1E 6DB, United Kingdom
| | - N C Cooper
- University College London & University College Hospital, EGA Wing, 25 Grafton Way, London WC1E 6DB, United Kingdom
| | - D Siassakos
- University College London & University College Hospital, EGA Wing, 25 Grafton Way, London WC1E 6DB, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
O'Brien S, Jordan S, Siassakos D. The role of manual rotation in avoiding and managing OVD. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 56:69-80. [PMID: 30670334 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Revised: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Manual rotation (MR) is the most common technique used by accoucheurs who wish to correct malposition of the foetal head to either avoid or facilitate an operative vaginal delivery (OVD). MR can be performed using either a whole-hand or a digital approach. MR should be formally taught and trainees should be assessed for competence, and later, performance should ideally be tracked with statistical control charts. There is paucity of robust evidence evaluating MR relative to the other methods of rotational OVD: rotational forceps (RF) and rotational ventouse (RV). Furthermore, there is little evidence concerning long-term maternal outcomes of rotational OVD. A prospective randomised trial of MR versus either RF or RV is clearly needed, along with a core outcome set for OVD to facilitate comprehensive evaluation programmes that focus on aspects pertaining to women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen O'Brien
- Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Dept of Women's Health, The Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. stephen.o'
| | - Sharon Jordan
- Dept of Women's Health, The Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Dept of Women's Health, The Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Shakespeare C, Merriel A, Bakhbakhi D, Baneszova R, Barnard K, Lynch M, Storey C, Blencowe H, Boyle F, Flenady V, Gold K, Horey D, Mills T, Siassakos D. Parents' and healthcare professionals' experiences of care after stillbirth in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-summary. BJOG 2018; 126:12-21. [PMID: 30099831 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stillbirth has a profound impact on women, families, and healthcare workers. The burden is highest in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is need for respectful and supportive care for women, partners, and families after bereavement. OBJECTIVE To perform a qualitative meta-summary of parents' and healthcare professionals' experiences of care after stillbirth in LMICs. SEARCH STRATEGY Search terms were formulated by identifying all synonyms, thesaurus terms, and variations for stillbirth. Databases searched were AMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, BNI, CINAHL. SELECTION CRITERIA Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies that addressed parents' or healthcare professionals' experience of care after stillbirth in LMICs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Studies were screened, and data extracted in duplicate. Data were analysed using the Sandelowski meta-summary technique that calculates frequency and intensity effect sizes (FES/IES). MAIN RESULTS In all, 118 full texts were screened, and 34 studies from 17 countries were included. FES range was 15-68%. Most studies had IES 1.5-4.5. Women experience a broad range of manifestations of grief following stillbirth, which may not be recognised by healthcare workers or in their communities. Lack of recognition exacerbates negative experiences of stigmatisation, blame, devaluation, and loss of social status. Adequately developed health systems, with trained and supported staff, are best equipped to provide the support and information that women want after stillbirth. CONCLUSIONS Basic interventions could have an immediate impact on the experiences of women and their families after stillbirth. Examples include public education to reduce stigma, promoting the respectful maternity care agenda, and investigating stillbirth appropriately. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Reducing stigma, promoting respectful care and investigating stillbirth have a positive impact after stillbirth for women and families in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Shakespeare
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health, The Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - A Merriel
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health, The Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - D Bakhbakhi
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health, The Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - R Baneszova
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Bratislava, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - K Barnard
- Library and Knowledge Service, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - M Lynch
- Department of Women and Children's Health, The Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - C Storey
- International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| | - H Blencowe
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - F Boyle
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - V Flenady
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - K Gold
- Department of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - D Horey
- La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic., Australia
| | - T Mills
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - D Siassakos
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health, The Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Schirmann A, Boyle FM, Horey D, Siassakos D, Ellwood D, Rowlands I, Flenady V. Understanding mothers' decision-making needs for autopsy consent after stillbirth: Framework analysis of a large survey. Birth 2018; 45:255-262. [PMID: 29498429 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Revised: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experiencing stillbirth is devastating and leaves parents searching for causes. Autopsy is the gold standard for investigation, but deciding to consent to this procedure is very difficult for parents. Decision support in the form of clear, consistent, and parent-centered information is likely to be helpful. The aims of this study were to understand the influences on parents' decisions about autopsy after stillbirth and to identify attributes of effective decision support that align with parents' needs. METHODS Framework analysis using the Decision Drivers Model was used to analyze responses from 460 Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) mothers who took part in a multi-country online survey of parents' experiences of stillbirth. The main outcomes examined were factors influencing mothers' decisions to consent to autopsy after stillbirth. RESULTS Free-text responses from 454 ANZ mothers referenced autopsy, yielding 1221 data segments for analysis. The data confirmed the difficult decision autopsy consent entails. Mothers had a strong need for answers coupled with a strong need to protect their baby. Four "decision drivers" were confirmed: preparedness for the decision; parental responsibility; possible consequences; and role of health professionals. Each had the capacity to influence decisions for or against autopsy. Also prominent were the "aftermath" of the decision: receiving the results; and decisional regret or uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS The influences on decisions about autopsy are diverse and unpredictable. Effective decision support requires a consistent and structured approach that is built on understanding of parents' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Schirmann
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Frances M Boyle
- Mater Research Institute-UQ, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Dell Horey
- School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering (SHE), La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic., Australia
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Centre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Chilterns, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - David Ellwood
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
| | - Ingrid Rowlands
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
| | - Vicki Flenady
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Preshaw J, Siassakos D, James M, Draycott T, Vyas S, Burden C. Patients and hospital managers want laparoscopic simulation training to become mandatory before live operating: a multicentre qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions. BMJ STEL 2018; 5:39-45. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundSurgical procedures are complex and susceptible to human error. Individual surgical skill correlates with improved patient outcomes demonstrating that surgical proficiency is vitally important for patient safety. Evidence demonstrates that simulation training improves laparoscopic surgical skills; however, projects to implement and integrate laparoscopic simulation into core surgical curricula have had varied success. One barrier to successful implementation has been the lack of awareness and prioritisation of simulation initiatives by key stakeholders.ObjectiveTo determine the knowledge and perceptions of patients and hospital managers on laparoscopic surgery and simulation training in patient safety and healthcare.MethodA qualitative study was conducted in the Southwest of England. 40 semistructured interviews were undertaken with patients attending general gynaecology clinics and general surgical and gynaecology hospital managers.ResultsSix key themes identified included: positive expectations of laparoscopic surgery; perceptions of problems and financial implications of laparoscopic surgery; lack of awareness of difficulties with surgical training; desire for laparoscopic simulation training and competency testing for patient benefit; conflicting priorities of laparoscopic simulation in healthcare; and drawbacks of surgical simulation training. Patients and managers were largely unaware of the risks of laparoscopic surgery and challenges for training. Managers highlighted conflicting financial priorities when purchasing educational equipment. Patients stated that they would have greater confidence in a surgeon who had undertaken mandatory surgical simulation training and perceived purchasing simulation equipment to be a high priority in the National Health Services. Most patients and hospital managers believed trainees should pass an examination on a simulator prior to live operating.ConclusionsCompetency-based mandatory laparoscopic simulation was strongly supported by the majority of stakeholders to augment the initial learning curve of surgeons.
Collapse
|
43
|
Siassakos D, Jackson S, Storey C. Re: Stillbirth: balancing patient preferences with clinical evidence: What about combining them into Informed Patient Choice? BJOG 2018; 125:767. [PMID: 29468801 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
44
|
Ateva E, Blencowe H, Castillo T, Dev A, Farmer M, Kinney M, Mishra SK, Hopkins Leisher S, Maloney S, Ponce Hardy V, Quigley P, Ruidiaz J, Siassakos D, Stoner JE, Storey C, Tejada de Rivero Sawers ML. Every Woman, Every Child's 'Progress in Partnership' for stillbirths: a commentary by the stillbirth advocacy working group. BJOG 2018; 125:1058-1060. [PMID: 29285881 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E Ateva
- White Ribbon Alliance, Washington, DC, USA
| | - H Blencowe
- MARCH Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - T Castillo
- HealthRight International, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Dev
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - M Farmer
- NCD Child, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA
| | - M Kinney
- Save the Children, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - S K Mishra
- AIHMS Ansul-India Health & Management Services, New Delhi, India
| | | | - S Maloney
- UNMC College of Public Health, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - V Ponce Hardy
- MARCH Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - P Quigley
- Health Partners International, Lewes, UK
| | - J Ruidiaz
- Fundación Era en Abril, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - D Siassakos
- International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK.,University of Bristol and Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - J E Stoner
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Brock Institute for Global and Community Health, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | - C Storey
- International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bakhbakhi D, Siassakos D, Storey C, Heazell A, Lynch M, Timlin L, Burden C. PARENTS 2 study protocol: pilot of Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in the review of Their Stillbirth/perinatal death. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020164. [PMID: 29326197 PMCID: PMC5781014 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The perinatal mortality review meeting that takes place within the hospital following a stillbirth or neonatal death enables clinicians to learn vital lessons to improve care for women and their families for the future. Recent evidence suggests that parents are unaware that a formal review following the death of their baby takes place. Many would welcome the opportunity to feedback into the meeting itself. Parental involvement in the perinatal mortality review meeting has the potential to improve patient satisfaction, drive improvements in patient safety and promote an open culture within healthcare. Yet evidence on the feasibility of involving bereaved parents in the review process is lacking. This paper describes the protocol for the Parents' Active Role and Engangement iN the review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death study (PARENTS 2) , whereby healthcare professionals' and stakeholders' perceptions of parental involvement will be investigated, and parental involvement in the perinatal mortality review will be piloted and evaluated at two hospitals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will investigate perceptions of parental involvement in the perinatal mortality review process by conducting four focus groups. A three-round modified Delphi technique will be employed to gain a consensus on principles of parental involvement in the perinatal mortality review process. We will use three sequential rounds, including a national consensus meeting workshop with experts in stillbirth, neonatal death and bereavement care, and a two-stage anonymous online questionnaire. We will pilot a new perinatal mortality review process with parental involvement over a 6-month study period. The impact of the new process will be evaluated by assessing parents' experiences of their care and parents' and staff perceptions of their involvement in the process by conducting further focus groups and using a Parent Generated Index questionnaire. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has ethical approval from the UK Health Research Authority. We will disseminate the findings through national and international conferences and international peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya Bakhbakhi
- Centre for Academic Women’s Health, University of Bristol, Women’s Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Centre for Academic Women’s Health, University of Bristol, Women’s Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Alexander Heazell
- Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biological, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Mary Lynch
- Centre for Academic Women’s Health, University of Bristol, Women’s Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura Timlin
- Centre for Academic Women’s Health, University of Bristol, Women’s Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Christy Burden
- Centre for Academic Women’s Health, University of Bristol, Women’s Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Siassakos D, Jackson S, Gleeson K, Chebsey C, Ellis A, Storey C, Heazell A, Draycott T, Winter C, Hillman J, Cox R, Lewis J, Davey L. All bereaved parents are entitled to good care after stillbirth: a mixed-methods multicentre study (INSIGHT). BJOG 2018; 125:160-170. [PMID: 28758375 PMCID: PMC5763319 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand challenges in care after stillbirth and provide tailored solutions. DESIGN Multi-centre case study. SETTING Three maternity hospitals. POPULATION Parents with a stillborn baby, maternity staff. METHODS Thematic analysis of parent interviews and staff focus groups and service provision investigation. OUTCOMES 1 Themes; 2 Triangulation matrix; 3 Recommendations. RESULTS Twenty-one women, 14 partners, and 22 staff participated. Service Provision: Care for parents after stillbirth varies excessively; there are misconceptions; post-mortem does not delay follow-up. PRESENTATION Women 'do not feel right' before stillbirth; their management is haphazard and should be standardised. DIAGNOSIS Stillbirth is an emergency for parents but not always for staff; communication can seem cold; well-designed bereavement space is critical. Birth: Staff shift priorities to mother and future, but for parents their baby is still a baby; parents are not comfortable with staff recommending vaginal birth as the norm; there are several reasons why parents ask for a caesarean; better care involves clear communication, normal behaviour, and discussion of coping strategies. Post-mortem: Parents are influenced by discussions with staff. Staff should 'sow seeds', clarify its respectful nature, delineate its purpose, and explain the timescale. FOLLOW-UP It is not standardised; parents wish to see their multi-professional team. CONCLUSIONS There is unacceptable variation in care after stillbirth, and insensitive interactions between staff and bereaved parents. Understanding parents' needs, including why they ask for caesarean birth, will facilitate joint decision-making. Every bereaved parent is entitled to good, respectful care. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Care too varied & interactions often insensitive after stillbirth; national pathway & training urgently needed PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Why and how was the study carried out? Previous studies have shown that improving care after stillbirth is important for families. We investigated the opinions of bereaved parents and maternity staff to find ways to improve care. At three hospitals in 2013, all women who experienced a stillbirth were invited to an interview along with their partners. Thirty-five parents of 21 babies agreed to participate. Twenty-two obstetricians and midwives took part in focus group discussions. What were the main findings? Care was often not as good as it should and could be. Communication with parents was not always as sensitive as they would have liked because staff did not have appropriate training. Some women reported they did not 'feel right' before going to hospital. Once they arrived, there was no standard approach to how care was given. Sometimes there were long delays before the death of the baby was confirmed and action was taken. After it had been confirmed that the baby had died, staff focussed on the mothers' needs, but the parents' priorities were still with their baby. There were several reasons why parents asked for a caesarean birth that staff had not considered. Staff influenced parents' decisions about post-mortem examinations. Parents found it helpful when staff explained the respectful nature and purpose of the examination. After discharge from hospital, there was no consistent plan for how follow-up care would be given. Parents would have liked more information about their next hospital appointment. What are the limitations of the work? The parents interviewed depended on their memories of the details of the care, which happened some time ago. In staff group discussions, junior doctors may not have spoken openly because there were senior doctors present. Further research is necessary to understand and improve care globally. What is the implication for parents? Every bereaved parent is entitled to the best possible care after stillbirth, but some do not get good care. Parents and staff made suggestions that can help to develop processes for how care is given after stillbirth. These suggestions can also inform staff training, so that every single parent is treated respectfully and participates in decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Siassakos
- Centre for Academic Women's HealthChilterns, Women's Health, Southmead HospitalUniversity of BristolWestbury on TrymBristolUK
- International Stillbirth AllianceBristolUK
| | - S Jackson
- Psychology DepartmentUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK
| | | | - C Chebsey
- Severn Deanery, Health Education EnglandBristolUK
| | - A Ellis
- Severn Deanery, Health Education EnglandBristolUK
| | - C Storey
- Centre for Academic Women's HealthChilterns, Women's Health, Southmead HospitalUniversity of BristolWestbury on TrymBristolUK
- International Stillbirth AllianceBristolUK
| | - the INSIGHT Study Group
- Centre for Academic Women's HealthChilterns, Women's Health, Southmead HospitalUniversity of BristolWestbury on TrymBristolUK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Siassakos D, Silver R, Dudley D, Flenady V, Erwich JJ, Joseph KS. Stillbirth: understand, standardise, educate - time to end preventable harm. BJOG 2017; 125:99. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
48
|
Reinebrant HE, Leisher SH, Coory M, Henry S, Wojcieszek AM, Gardener G, Lourie R, Ellwood D, Teoh Z, Allanson E, Blencowe H, Draper ES, Erwich JJ, Frøen JF, Gardosi J, Gold K, Gordijn S, Gordon A, Heazell A, Khong TY, Korteweg F, Lawn JE, McClure EM, Oats J, Pattinson R, Pettersson K, Siassakos D, Silver RM, Smith G, Tunçalp Ö, Flenady V. Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth. BJOG 2017; 125:212-224. [PMID: 29193794 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stillbirth is a global health problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) application of the International Classification of Diseases for perinatal mortality (ICD-PM) aims to improve data on stillbirth to enable prevention. OBJECTIVES To identify globally reported causes of stillbirth, classification systems, and alignment with the ICD-PM. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, Global Health, and Pubmed from 2009 to 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA Reports of stillbirth causes in unselective cohorts. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pooled estimates of causes were derived for country representative reports. Systems and causes were assessed for alignment with the ICD-PM. Data are presented by income setting (low, middle, and high income countries; LIC, MIC, HIC). MAIN RESULTS Eighty-five reports from 50 countries (489 089 stillbirths) were included. The most frequent categories were Unexplained, Antepartum haemorrhage, and Other (all settings); Infection and Hypoxic peripartum (LIC), and Placental (MIC, HIC). Overall report quality was low. Only one classification system fully aligned with ICD-PM. All stillbirth causes mapped to ICD-PM. In a subset from HIC, mapping obscured major causes. CONCLUSIONS There is a paucity of quality information on causes of stillbirth globally. Improving investigation of stillbirths and standardisation of audit and classification is urgently needed and should be achievable in all well-resourced settings. Implementation of the WHO Perinatal Mortality Audit and Review guide is needed, particularly across high burden settings. FUNDING HR, SH, SHL, and AW were supported by an NHMRC-CRE grant (APP1116640). VF was funded by an NHMRC-CDF (APP1123611). TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Urgent need to improve data on causes of stillbirths across all settings to meet global targets. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Background and methods Nearly three million babies are stillborn every year. These deaths have deep and long-lasting effects on parents, healthcare providers, and the society. One of the major challenges to preventing stillbirths is the lack of information about why they happen. In this study, we collected reports on the causes of stillbirth from high-, middle-, and low-income countries to: (1) Understand the causes of stillbirth, and (2) Understand how to improve reporting of stillbirths. Findings We found 85 reports from 50 different countries. The information available from the reports was inconsistent and often of poor quality, so it was hard to get a clear picture about what are the causes of stillbirth across the world. Many different definitions of stillbirth were used. There was also wide variation in what investigations of the mother and baby were undertaken to identify the cause of stillbirth. Stillbirths in all income settings (low-, middle-, and high-income countries) were most frequently reported as Unexplained, Other, and Haemorrhage (bleeding). Unexplained and Other are not helpful in understanding why a baby was stillborn. In low-income countries, stillbirths were often attributed to Infection and Complications during labour and birth. In middle- and high-income countries, stillbirths were often reported as Placental complications. Limitations We may have missed some reports as searches were carried out in English only. The available reports were of poor quality. Implications Many countries, particularly those where the majority of stillbirths occur, do not report any information about these deaths. Where there are reports, the quality is often poor. It is important to improve the investigation and reporting of stillbirth using a standardised system so that policy makers and healthcare workers can develop effective stillbirth prevention programs. All stillbirths should be investigated and reported in line with the World Health Organization standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H E Reinebrant
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| | - S H Leisher
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| | - M Coory
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - S Henry
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| | - A M Wojcieszek
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| | - G Gardener
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| | - R Lourie
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - D Ellwood
- Griffith University School of Medicine, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.,Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Z Teoh
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Department of Medicine-Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - E Allanson
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.,School of Women's and Infants' Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - H Blencowe
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - E S Draper
- MBRRACE-UK, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester Centre for Medicine, Leicester, UK
| | - J J Erwich
- International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK.,University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J F Frøen
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - K Gold
- International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK.,Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - S Gordijn
- International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK.,University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - A Gordon
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Aep Heazell
- Division of Developmental Biomedicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - T Y Khong
- SA Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - F Korteweg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J E Lawn
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - E M McClure
- International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK.,Department of Social, Statistical and Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - J Oats
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity (CCOPMM), Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - R Pattinson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - K Pettersson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Siassakos
- International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK.,Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Social and Community Medicine, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R M Silver
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Gcs Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NIHR Cambridge Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ö Tunçalp
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - V Flenady
- Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gamaleldin I, Harding D, Siassakos D, Draycott T, Odd D. Significant intraventricular hemorrhage is more likely in very preterm infants born by vaginal delivery: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 32:477-482. [DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1383980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Harding
- Women’s and Children’s Health, St. Michael’s Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Tim Draycott
- Women’s Health, Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - David Odd
- Women’s and Children's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bakhbakhi D, Siassakos D, Burden C, Jones F, Yoward F, Redshaw M, Murphy S, Storey C. Learning from deaths: Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death (the PARENTS 1 study). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17:333. [PMID: 28969596 PMCID: PMC5625604 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1509-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Following a perinatal death, a formal standardised multi-disciplinary review should take place, to learn from the death of a baby and facilitate improvements in future care. It has been recommended that bereaved parents should be offered the opportunity to give feedback on the care they have received and integrate this feedback into the perinatal mortality review process. However, the MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Confidential Enquiry (2015) found that only one in 20 cases parental concerns were included in the review. Although guidance suggests parental opinion should be sought, little evidence exists on how this may be incorporated into the perinatal mortality review process. The purpose of the PARENTS study was to investigate bereaved parents’ views on involvement in the perinatal mortality review process. Methods A semi-structured focus group of 11 bereaved parents was conducted in South West England. A purposive sampling technique was utilised to recruit a diverse sample of women and their partners who had experienced a perinatal death more than 6 months prior to the study. A six-stage thematic analysis was followed to explore parental perceptions and expectations of the perinatal mortality review process. Results Four over-arching themes emerged from the analysis: transparency; flexibility combined with specificity; inclusivity; and a positive approach. It was evident that the majority of parents were supportive of their involvement in the perinatal mortality review process and they wanted to know the outcome of the meeting. It emerged that an individualised approach should be taken to allow flexibility on when and how they could contribute to the process. The emotional aspects of care should be considered as well as the clinical care. Parents identified that the whole care pathway should be examined during the review including antenatal, postnatal, and neonatal and community based care. They agreed that there should be an opportunity for parents to give feedback on both good and poor aspects of their care. Conclusion Parents were unaware that a review of their baby’s death took place in the hospital. Parental involvement in the perinatal mortality review process would promote an open culture in the healthcare system and learning from adverse events including deaths. Further research should focus on designing and evaluating a perinatal mortality review process where parental feedback will be integral. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1509-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya Bakhbakhi
- Centre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Chilterns, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
| | - Dimitrios Siassakos
- Centre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Chilterns, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Christy Burden
- Centre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Chilterns, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | | | | | - Maggie Redshaw
- Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Samantha Murphy
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|