Association of fetal fraction and cell-free fetal DNA with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adverse pregnancy outcomes, which can be caused by multiple factors, present a significant threat to the health of mothers and their babies. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from placental trophoblast cells might be able to reflect placental and fetal status. Previous studies have yielded controversial results regarding the association of FF or cffDNA with various adverse pregnancy outcomes. A previous study has attempted to systematically assess the association between low fetal fraction (FF) and adverse pregnancy outcomes, but it failed to perform quantitative analyses due to the few studies included. In the present study, we attempted to quantitatively assess the association of FF (or cffDNA) with adverse pregnancy outcomes and further analyze the causes of heterogeneity.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association of high/low FF or cffDNA with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science from January 1, 1990, to June 15, 2022 in this meta-analysis.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies on the relationships of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with FF or cell free DNA were included. Non-English literature was excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data about pregnancy outcomes and cell free DNA were extracted and meta-analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed by different outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 11 studies included involving 8280 participants. No significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2 = 27%, 25%), and a fixed-effect model was used for weighted quantitative analysis. The results revealed that the FF or cffDNA during pregnancy was significantly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women (OR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.24, 1.99], P = 0.233). The overall incidence of the maternal adverse outcomes was 8% (95% CI: 5-13). Subgroup analysis of different outcomes showed an evident association between low FF or cffDNA and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (OR = 1.76, 95% CI [1.36, 2.27], P = 0.581). There was no evidence that the occurrence of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) and placental abnormality was associated with FF or cffDNA. No association was observed between low FF or cffDNA during pregnancy and adverse outcomes in fetuses (OR = 1.39, 95% CI [0.99, 1.94], P = 0.242). The overall incidence of adverse outcomes in fetuses was 8% (95% CI: 6-11). There were controversies over the association between high FF or cffDNA and HDP, and sPTB and small for gestational age infant, among different studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women with low FF or cffDNA during the first or second trimester of pregnancy have an overall increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, especially HDP. However, the association between FF and various pregnancy outcomes needs to be further explored by more prospective studies.

The Association between Low Fetal Fraction of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes for Placental Compromise

(1) Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a screening test for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free fetal DNA. The fetal fragments (FF) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are derived from apoptotic trophoblast of the placenta. The level of fetal cfDNA is known to be influenced by gestational age, multiple pregnancies, maternal weight, and height. (2) Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective observational study which examines the relationship between the fetal fraction (FF) of cell-free DNA in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies. A total of 1393 samples were collected between 10 weeks and 6 days, and 25 weeks and 3 days of gestation. (3) Results: Hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) occurred more frequently in the low FF group than the normal FF group (5.17% vs. 1.91%, p = 0.001). Although the rates of small for gestational age (SGA) and placental abruption did not significantly differ between groups, the composite outcome was significantly higher in the low FF group (7.76% vs. 3.64%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, women who later experienced complications such as HDP or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) had significantly lower plasma FF levels compared to those without complications (p < 0.001). After adjustments, the low FF group exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of placental compromise (adjusted odds ratio: 1.946). (4) Conclusions: Low FF in NIPT during the first and early second trimesters is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly HDP, suggesting its potential as a predictive marker for such outcomes.

Fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in noninvasive prenatal testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 56,110 pregnant women

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive prenatal testing by cell-free DNA analysis is offered to pregnant women worldwide to screen for fetal aneuploidies. In noninvasive prenatal testing, the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation is measured as a quality control parameter. Given that fetal cell-free DNA originates from the placenta, the fetal fraction might also reflect placental health and maternal pregnancy adaptation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the association between the fetal fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton pregnancies opting for noninvasive prenatal testing between June 2018 and June 2019 within the Dutch nationwide implementation study (Trial by Dutch Laboratories for Evaluation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing [TRIDENT]-2). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess associations between fetal fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fetal fraction was assessed as a continuous variable and as <10th percentile, corresponding to a fetal fraction <2.5%.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 56,110 pregnancies. In the analysis of fetal fraction as a continuous variable, a decrease in fetal fraction was associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27 [95% confidence interval, 1.89-2.78]), small for gestational age neonates <10th percentile (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37 [1.28-1.45]) and <2.3rd percentile (adjusted odds ratio, 2.63 [1.96-3.57]), and spontaneous preterm birth from 24 to 37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [1.01-1.03]). No association was found for fetal congenital anomalies (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [1.00-1.04]), stillbirth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [0.96-1.08]), or neonatal death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [0.96-1.08]). Similar associations were found for adverse pregnancy outcomes when fetal fraction was <10th percentile.

CONCLUSION

In early pregnancy, a low fetal fraction is associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings can be used to expand the potential of noninvasive prenatal testing in the future, enabling the prediction of pregnancy complications and facilitating tailored pregnancy management through intensified monitoring or preventive measures.

Analysis of retest reliability for pregnant women undergoing cfDNA testing with a no-call result

BACKGROUND

Determining the reasons for unreportable or no-call cell-free DNA (cfDNA) test results has been an ongoing issue, and a consensus on subsequent management is still lacking. This study aimed to explore potential factors related to no-call cfDNA test results and to discuss whether retest results are reliable.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancies undergoing cfDNA testing in 2021. Of the 9871 pregnant patients undergoing cfDNA testing, 111 had a no-call result, and their results were compared to those of 170 control patients. The no-call rate was 1.12% (111/9871), and the primary cause for no-call results was data fluctuation (88.29%, 98/111). Medical conditions were significantly more frequent in the no-call group than in the reportable results group (P < 0.001). After retesting, 107 (107/111, 96.40%) patients had a result, and the false-positive rate (FPR) of retesting was 10.09% (10.09%, 11/109). In addition, placental lesions were more frequent in the no-call group than in the reportable results group (P = 0.037), and 4 patients, all in the no-call group, experienced pregnancy loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women with medical conditions are more likely to have a no-call result. A retest is suggested for patients with a no-call result, but retests have a high FPR. In addition, pregnant women with a no-call result are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In conclusion, more attention should be given to pregnant women for whom a no-call cfDNA result is obtained.

Cytogenetic outcomes following a failed cell-free DNA screen: a population-based retrospective cohort study of 35,146 singleton pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Cell-free fetal DNA screening is routinely offered to pregnant individuals to screen for aneuploidies. Although cell-free DNA screening is consistently more accurate than multiple-marker screening, it sometimes fails to yield a result. These test failures and their clinical implications are poorly described in the literature. Some studies suggest that a failed cell-free DNA screening result is associated with increased likelihood of cytogenetic abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the association between a failed cell-free DNA test and common aneuploidies. The objectives were to determine: (1) the proportion of test failures on first and subsequent attempts, and (2) whether a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt is associated with increased likelihood of common aneuploidies (trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from Ontario's prescribed maternal and child registry, Better Outcomes Registry and Network Ontario. The study included all singleton pregnancies in Ontario with an estimated date of delivery from September 1, 2016 to March 31, 2019 that had a cell-free DNA screening record in the registry. Specific outcomes (trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies) of pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt were compared with those of pregnancies with low-risk cell-free DNA-screening results using modified Poisson regression adjusted for funding status (publicly funded vs self-paid), gestational age at screening, method of conception, and maternal age for autosomal aneuploidies.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 35,146 pregnancies that had cell-free DNA screening during the study period. The overall cell-free DNA screening failure rate was 4.8% on first attempt and 2.2% after multiple attempts. An abnormal cytogenetic result for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, or sex chromosome aneuploidies was identified in 19.4% of pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screening for which cytogenetic testing was performed. Pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt had a relative risk of 130.3 (95% confidence interval, 64.7-262.6) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13, and a risk difference of 5.4% (95% confidence interval, 2.6-8.3), compared with pregnancies with a low-risk result. The risk of sex chromosome aneuploidies was not significantly greater in pregnancies with a failed result compared with pregnancies with a low-risk result (relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-7.9; relative difference, 1.2%; 95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 3.2).

CONCLUSION

Cell-free DNA screening test failures are relatively common. Although repeated testing improves the likelihood of an informative result, pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen upon first attempt remain at increased risk for common autosomal aneuploidies, but not sex chromosome aneuploidies.

Correlation of low fetal fraction of cell-free DNA at the early second-trimester and pregnancy complications related to placental dysfunction in twin pregnancy

Introduction

This study aimed to determine the correlation between fetal fraction (FF) of cell-free DNA (cf-DNA) and pregnancy complications related to placental dysfunction in Twin Pregnancy.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed twin pregnant women who underwent non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at 12⁺⁰-26⁺⁶ weeks of gestation from April 2017 to April 2021. Low fetal fraction (LFF) was defined individually as less than the 25th, 10th, 5th, and 2.5th percentile among all fetal fractions in the cohort. Primary outcomes included gestational hypertension (GH), preeclampsia (PE), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and small for gestational age (SGA). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between LFF and pregnancy complications.

Results

A total of 500 twin pregnancies (male-male twins, 245; female-female twins, 255) were included in this study. In LFF group (FF < 25th percentiles), maternal BMI was significantly higher than FF > 75th percentiles (23.6 kg/m² vs. 21.3 kg/m²; P < 0.001). The risk of SGA increased gradually from FF < 25th percentiles [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-2.99; P = 0.016] to FF < 2.5th percentiles (adjusted OR, 4.44; 95% CI,1.33-14.82; P < 0.015). In addition, the risks of SGA in both fetuses were higher than the risks of at least one fetus SGA in LFF group. LFF had no correlation with GH, PE, and GDM in twin pregnancy.

Conclusion

LFF has a strong association with increased risk of SGA in twin pregnancy. Moreover, FF of cf-DNA may provide a new idea for the early screening of diseases related to placental dysfunction in twin pregnancy.

Low Fetal Fraction of Cell Free DNA at Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening Increases the Subsequent Risk of Preterm Birth in Uncomplicated Singleton Pregnancy

Objective

To examine the association between low fetal fraction (FF) of cell free DNA determined at non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and the subsequent risk of preterm birth in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy.

Methods

We retrospectively interrogated NIPS System and hospitalization records from April 2018 to August 2019 and obtained results from 1521 consecutive and uncomplicated women with singleton pregnancy in which plasma FF of cell free DNA at NIPS had been investigated together with birth outcomes. We examined the association between FF and preterm birth (PTB) by regression analysis.

Results

The incidence of preterm birth, low birthweight, and macrosomia in the study population was 5.06%, 2.89%, and 7.17%, respectively. FF at NIPS in the second to fourth quartiles (8.40-11.07, 11.08-13.70, and >13.70%, respectively) was associated with higher gestational age at delivery relative to the lowest quartile (<8.40%), with estimated mean increases of 0.27 weeks (95% CI: 0.05-0.49), 0.29 weeks (95% CI: 0.06-0.51), and 0.28 weeks (95% CI: 0.05-0.51), respectively (P for trend = 0.027). Low FF (< the 5^th percentile) was associated with an increased risk of PTB (adjusted OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.01-4.98, P = 0.047) compared to normal FF (≥ the 5^th and ≤ the 95^th percentiles). In addition, when compared to women with normal FF and body mass index (BMI) <25 at NIPS, the risk of early PTB (< 34 weeks gestation) was remarkably significantly higher among those with low FF and BMI ≥25 (adjusted OR: 6.29, 95% CI: 1.71-23.15, P = 0.006).

Conclusion

Our study supports the association of low FF at NIPS with PTB (especially early PTB) for uncomplicated singleton pregnancy.

Retrospective analysis of the risk factors associated with failure in obtaining effective noninvasive prenatal test results and pregnancy outcomes: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

: To explore the pregnancy outcomes of women who could not obtain effective results from noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and examine the factors leading to test failure.

METHODS

: From April 2017 to December 2019, 120,041 pregnant women enrolled for voluntary NIPT. The case group comprised of 274 (274/120,041) women who failed to obtain effective NIPT results, and the control group (n = 540) was from the same population who obtained effective NIPT results and matched by age at a 1:2 ratio. Abnormal pregnancy rates between the two groups were analyzed using Chi-square analysis. NIPT failure risk factors were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

: Logistic regression analysis showed that increased maternal age (OR=0.988; 95% CI = 0.982-0.994), increased pregnancy age (OR=0.989; 95%CI = 0.988-0.991), and decreased cell-free fetal DNA concentration (OR=1.050; 95%CI=1.043-1.058) were independent risk factors for NIPT failure. 15 cases showed fetus loss in cases of NIPT failure. There was a significant difference in abnormal pregnancy rate between the NIPT success and failure groups (χ2 = 50.943, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

: The specific interventions, guidance, and precautions are needed for pregnant women during perinatal period, especially those who have no effective NIPT results.

Factors Affecting the Fetal Fraction in Noninvasive Prenatal Screening: A Review

A paradigm shift in noninvasive prenatal screening has been made with the discovery of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Noninvasive prenatal screening is primarily used to screen for fetal aneuploidies, and has been used globally. Fetal fraction, an important parameter in the analysis of noninvasive prenatal screening results, is the proportion of fetal cell-free DNA present in the total maternal plasma cell-free DNA. It combines biological factors and bioinformatics algorithms to interpret noninvasive prenatal screening results and is an integral part of quality control. Maternal and fetal factors may influence fetal fraction. To date, there is no broad consensus on the factors that affect fetal fraction. There are many different approaches to evaluate this parameter, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Different fetal fraction calculation methods may be used in different testing platforms or laboratories. This review includes numerous publications that focused on the understanding of the significance, influencing factors, and interpretation of fetal fraction to provide a deeper understanding of this parameter.

Clinical Validation of Fetal cfDNA Analysis Using Rolling-Circle-Replication and Imaging Technology in Osaka (CRITO Study)

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) has been adopted as the first choice for aneuploidy screening. The purposes of this study were to investigate the accuracy of Vanadis^® NIPT (hereafter CRITO-NIPT) in order to gain a deeper insight into the reasons for discrepancies, as well as to discuss the role of fetal ultrasound.

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2020, CRITO-NIPT was performed in 1218 cases of patients who underwent CVS or amniocentesis after a detailed fetal ultrasound exam and genetic counseling. The CRITO-NIPT results were compared with the genetic results. In cases of test discrepancies, the placentae were collected for detailed genetic research, and the pre-procedure fetal ultrasound findings were referred to.

RESULTS

The positive predictive value of T21, T18, and T13 was 93.55%, 88.46%, and 100%, respectively. In 90% of the of false positive (FP) cases, the placentae were examined. In 75% of the CRITO FP-T21 cases, placental mosaicism, or a demised twin's T21, were confirmed. There were complicated mosaic cases, including tetrasomy 21/trisomy7 and monosomy 21/trisomy21 cases. In one of three no-call cases, an intermediate deletion of chromosome 13 was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The CRITO study investigated the mechanism of false positives, and the detailed mechanisms in mosaic and no-call cases. There have hitherto been no reports that have provided insight by partitioning the placenta to compare the NIPT and invasive test results, nor that have provided detailed ultrasound findings in the cases of discordant results, revealing the demonstrated importance of, and necessity for, detailed ultrasonography. This article describes the potential of rolling-circle replication as a powerful biosensing platform, as well as the importance of examining the fetus in detail with ultrasound. However, we should remember that the potential applications raise ethical and social concerns that go beyond aneuploidy and its methodology.

Clinical and biological determinants of circulating tumor DNA detection and prognostication using a next-generation sequencing panel assay

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is utilized for molecular profiling of cancers, and is under investigation for a growing number of applications based on the assumption that ctDNA levels faithfully reflect disease burden. Our objective was to investigate whether patient and tumor characteristics may impact ctDNA detection or levels and the prognostic significance of ctDNA levels or mutations. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of a comprehensively annotated cohort of 561 patients at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center with advanced solid cancers who underwent ctDNA testing using a commercial targeted next-generation sequencing assay. ctDNA detection in advanced cancers was associated with older age, non-obese body mass index, and diabetes, but not with tumor diameter, volume, lesion number, or other pathological features. Regression models indicate that no more than 14.3% of the variance in ctDNA levels between patients was explained by known clinical factors and disease burden. Even after adjusting for established prognostic factors and tumor burden, ctDNA levels were associated with worse survival among patients without prior systemic therapy, while ctDNA mutations were associated with survival among patients who previously received systemic treatment. These findings uncover clinical factors that affect ctDNA detection in patients with advanced cancers and challenge the convention that ctDNA is a surrogate for tumor burden. Our study also indicates that the prognostic value of ctDNA levels and mutations are independent of tumor burden and dependent on treatment context.

Low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome: Analysis of a subcohort of the TRIDENT-2 study

Objectives

To assess the association between low fetal fraction (FF) in prenatal cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of participants of the TRIDENT‐2 study (Dutch nationwide government‐supported study offering cfDNA screening for fetal aneuploidies) who received a failed test result due to low FF (<4%) between April 2017 until February 2018. Outcome measures included pregnancy‐induced hypertension (PIH), pre‐eclampsia (PE), small for gestational age neonates (SGA), spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), chromosomal aberrations, and congenital structural anomalies.

Results

Test failure due to low FF occurred in 295 women (1.12% of tests performed). Information regarding pregnancy outcomes was available for 96.3% of these women. The incidence of PIH, PE, SGA, sPTB, and GDM was 11.2%, 4.1%, 7.3%, 5.1%, and 14.8%, respectively. The prevalence of chromosomal aberrations and congenital structural anomalies was 1.4% and 4.1%, respectively. Incidences of PIH, PE ≥ 34 weeks of gestation, GDM, and prevalence of aneuploidy and congenital structural anomalies were higher in women with low FF compared to the general Dutch obstetric population.

Conclusion

Low FF is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The value of FF in the prediction of these outcomes needs to be further established.

Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review

Objective

Low fetal fraction (LFF) in prenatal cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) testing is an important cause of test failure and no‐call results. LFF might reflect early abnormal placentation and therefore be associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. Here, we review the available literature on the relationship between LFF in cfDNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome.

Method

A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE up to November 1, 2020.

Results

Five studies met the criteria for inclusion; all were retrospective observational cohort studies. The cohort sizes ranged from 370 to 6375 pregnancies, with all tests performed in the first trimester or early second trimester. A 4% cutoff for LFF was used in two studies, two studies used the 5th and 25th percentiles, respectively, and one study used a variety of cutoff values for LFF. LFF in prenatal cfDNA testing was observed to be associated with hypertensive disease of pregnancy, small for gestational age neonates, and preterm birth. Conflicting results were found regarding the association between LFF and gestational diabetes mellitus.

Conclusions

LFF in cfDNA testing is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome,specifically pregnancy‐related hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, and impaired fetal growth related to placental dysfunction. Since the available evidence is limited, a large prospective cohort study on the relationship between fetal fraction and pregnancy outcomes is needed.

What's already known about this topic?

Low fetal fraction (LFF) in prenatal cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) testing is an important cause of test failure and no‐call results and has been associated with aneuploidy

LFF might also reflect early abnormal placentation and therefore be associated with adverse pregnancy outcome

What does this review add?

This review summarizes the available data on LFF in prenatal cfDNA testing and its relation to adverse pregnancy outcomes

LFF was found to be associated with pregnancy‐related hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, and impaired fetal growth related to placental dysfunction

Since the available evidence is limited, a large prospective cohort study on the relationship between fetal fraction and pregnancy outcomes is needed

Circulating Nucleic Acids in Maternal Plasma and Serum in Pregnancy Complications: Are They Really Useful in Clinical Practice? A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review was carried out to summarize the available evidence to assess whether circulating nucleic acids in maternal plasma and serum (CNAPS) have the potential to serve as extra and independent markers for the prediction and/or progression monitoring of the most common and severe complications of pregnancy, including preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm delivery, morbidly adherent placenta, gestational diabetes, antiphospholipid syndrome, threatened abortion, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, and hyperemesis gravidarum.

METHOD

A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and ISI Web of Knowledge databases was conducted to identify relevant studies that included amounts of CNAPS in the abovementioned pregnancy complications.

RESULTS

Eighty-three studies met the eligibility criteria. The vast majority of studies were conducted on the quantity of total circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) and cell free fetal DNA (cffDNA), and some were conducted on messenger RNA (mRNA) species. A few studies have instead evaluated the cell free DNA fetal fraction (cfDNAff), but only in a limited number of pregnancy complications. Despite the growing interest and the abundance of the papers available, little information is available for other new CNAPS, including microRNA (miRNA), long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and circular RNA.

CONCLUSION

Due to the heterogeneity of the populations enrolled, the scarcity of the studies that adjusted the CNAPS values for possible confounding factors, and the difficulty in interpreting the published data, no conclusion regarding the statistical robustness and clinical relevance of the data can be made at present. If assayed at the third trimester, the CNAPS have, however, shown better performance, and could be used in populations already at risk of developing complications as suggested by the presence of other clinical features. Other CNAPS, including miRNA, are under investigation, especially for the screening of gestational diabetes mellitus, but no data about their clinical utility are available. Circulating DNA (cfDNA, cffDNA, and cfDNAff) and mRNA have not been properly evaluated yet, especially in patients asymptomatic early in pregnancy but who developed complications later, perhaps because of the high cost of these techniques and the availability of other predictors of pregnancy complications (biochemical, biophysical, and ultrasound markers). Therefore, from the analysis of the data, the positive predictive value is not available. As regards the new CNAPS, including miRNA, there are still no sufficient data to understand if they can be promising markers for pregnancy complications monitoring and screening, since CNAPS are statistically weak and expensive. It is reasonable to currently conclude that the use of the CNAPS in clinical practice is not recommended.

More attention should be paid to pregnant women who fail non-invasive prenatal screening

OBJECTIVE

We discuss how to handle failure of first-pass non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and investigate the pregnancy outcomes after second-pass failure.

METHODS

A total of 35,187 pregnant women underwent NIPS in a single center. Those who failed first-pass NIPS were re-tested after a repeat blood draw. Those who failed again were offered genetic counseling. We recorded antenatal data and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 273 (0.78%) women failed the first test. On re-testing, 220 (80.59%) yielded reliable results and 53 failed the test again. Women with higher total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels evidenced a lower NIPS success rate (40%) and a higher incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most women who failed first-pass NIPS yielded reliable results on repeat testing, especially those with lower fetal fraction. Higher concentrations of cfDNA in maternal plasma were associated with poorer pregnancy outcomes. Such women require special attention, thus early medical intervention, to avoid an adverse prognosis.

Factors associated with test failure in pregnant women undergoing cell-free DNA-based testing for fetal trisomy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the factors associated with cell-free DNA test failure, and the optimal subsequent management of these pregnancies.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 27,363 singleton pregnancies undergoing cell-free DNA testing. Women with cell-free DNA test failure were divided into a high-risk group and a low-risk group according to their indications. The subsequent management and pregnancy outcomes of these women were followed up.

RESULTS

The rate of cell-free DNA test failure at the first sampling was 1.49%, and 78.4% of failures were due to a low fetal fraction. Of the 66 women who refused any subsequent management, an adverse pregnancy outcome was seen in 5 cases, all belonging to the high-risk group. Of the 13 low-risk women who chose second-trimester maternal serum screening, all obtained a low-risk maternal serum screening result and an unaffected pregnancy outcome. A redraw was chosen by 171 women, which yielded a result in 75.4% and their pregnancy outcomes were unaffected; 42 women had an uninformative result again and received an amniocentesis. As 158 women had an amniocentesis after the first sampling, this procedure was offered in 200 cases altogether. Abnormal genetic testing results were shown in six (3%, 6/200) cases, all in the high-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk pregnant women with cell-free DNA test failure are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. A second sampling for cell-free DNA test or maternal serum screening might be suggested to low-risk women. Invasive prenatal diagnosis should be offered to the high-risk patients, especially those with a second cell-free DNA test failure.

Performance of cell-free DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing: experience on 36,456 singleton and multiple pregnancies

Background

This paper describes the clinical practice and performance of cell-free DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a screening method for fetal trisomy 21, 18, and 13 (T21, T18, and T13) and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) in a general Italian pregnancy population.

Methods

The AMES-accredited laboratory offers NIPT in maternal blood as a screening test for fetal T21, T18, T13 and SCA. Samples were sequenced on a NextSeq 550 (Illumina) using the VeriSeq NIPT Solution v1 assay.

Results

A retrospective analysis was performed on 36,456 consecutive maternal blood samples, including 35,650 singleton pregnancies, 800 twin pregnancies, and 6 triplet pregnancies. Samples were tested between April 2017 and September 2019. The cohort included 46% elevated-risk and 54% low-risk patients. A result indicative of a classic trisomy was found in 356 (1%) of singleton or twin samples: 254 T21, 69 T18, and 33 T13. In addition, 145 results (0.4%) were indicative of a SCA. Of the combined 501 screen-positive cases, 484 had confirmatory diagnostic testing. NIPT results were confirmed in 99.2% (247/249) of T21 cases, 91.2% (62/68) of T18 cases, 84.4% (27/32) of T13 cases, and 86.7% (117/135) of SCA cases. In the 35,955 cases reported as unaffected by a classic trisomy or SCA, no false negative cases were reported. Assuming that false negative results would be reported, the sensitivity of NIPT was 100.00% for T21 (95% Cl 98.47–100.0), T18 (95% Cl 94.17–100.0), and T13 (95% Cl 87.54–100.0). The specificities were 99.99% (95% Cl 99.98–100.0), 99.98% (95% Cl 99.96–100.0), 99.99% (95% Cl 99.97–100.0), and 99.95% (95% Cl 99.92–99.97) for T21, T18, T13, and SCA, respectively.

Conclusion

This retrospective analysis of a large cohort of consecutive patients who had whole-genome sequencing-based NIPT for classic trisomies and SCA shows excellent detection rates and low false positive rates.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-021-00941-y.

Prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a Nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrician knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice

Background

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has revolutionized the prenatal screening landscape with its high accuracy and low false positive rate for detecting Trisomy 21, 18 and 13. Good understanding of its benefits and limitations is crucial for obstetricians to provide effective counselling and make informed decisions about its use. This study aimed to evaluate obstetrician knowledge and attitudes regarding NIPT for screening for the common trisomies, explore how obstetricians integrated NIPT into first-line and contingent screening, and determine whether expanded use of NIPT to screen for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes (CNVs) was widespread.

Methods

A questionnaire was designed and administered with reference to the CHERRIES criteria for online surveys. Doctors on the Obstetrics & Gynaecology trainee and specialist registers were invited to participate. Medians and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for confidence and knowledge scores.

Results

94/306 (30.7%) doctors responded to the survey. First trimester screening (FTS) remained the main method offered to screen for the common trisomies. 45.7% (43/94) offered NIPT as an alternative first-line screen for singletons and 30.9% (29/94) for monochorionic diamniotic twins. A significant proportion offered concurrent NT and NIPT (25/94, 26.6%), or FTS and NIPT (33/94, 35.1%) in singletons. Varying follow up strategies were offered at intermediate, high and very-high FTS risk cut-offs for Trisomy 21. Respondents were likely to offer screening for SCAs and CNVs to give patients autonomy of choice (53/94, 56.4% SCAs, 47/94, 50% CNVs) at no additional cost (52/94, 55.3% SCAs, 39/94, 41.5% CNVs). Median clinical knowledge scores were high (10/12) and did not differ significantly between specialists (95% CI 10–11) and non-specialists (95% CI 9.89–11). Lower scores were observed for scenarios in which NIPT would be more likely to fail.

Conclusions

Our findings show the diversity of clinical practice with regard to the incorporation of NIPT into prenatal screening algorithms, and suggest that the use of NIPT both as a first-line screening tool in the general obstetric population, and to screen for SCAs and CNVs, is becoming increasingly prevalent. Clear guidance and continuing educational support are essential for providers in this rapidly evolving field.

A retrospective analysis the clinic data and follow-up of non-invasive prenatal test in detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in more than 40,000 cases in a single prenatal diagnosis center

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in the detection of chromosomal aneuploidy according to the follow-up information from a single prenatal diagnosis center.

METHODS

A total of 40,311 cases were retrospectively reviewed. The screening was performed using a BGI protocol, pre-test and post-test genetic counseling was provided, and the pregnancy outcomes were recorded. The results of NIPT and clinical follow-up data were analyzed together with the pregnancy outcomes, confirmatory testing results, and ultrasound findings.

RESULTS

Of the 40,311cases were includes in the study, successful follow-up was conducted in 468 (1.16%) cases with high risk, 225 (0.56%) cases with rare autosomal trisomy (RAT) and copy number variation (CNV). 39,572 (98.17%) cases with low risk and 623 (1.57%) cases of which were confirmed with adverse pregnancy outcomes. 46 (0.1%) cases with failed tests. Among them, 398 (84.7%) cases with high-risk results chose invasive testing, revealing 198 true positive cases. In cases with RAT and CNV results, 189 cases underwent invasive testing, revealing 5 cases RAT and 4 pathogenic CNVs.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPT appears to be effective in detecting the fetal chromosomal aneuploidies T21, T18 and SCAs, but it exist false positive/negative cases, unconfirmed high-risk cfDNA results, and the high false positive rate in cases with RAT and CNV results implied the limitations of this screening method. Our study showed the importance to associate cfDNA screening results with clinical follow-up data and provided information that may help with result interpretation, genetic counseling and the decision making in clinic.

Association between cell-free DNA fetal fraction and gestational diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fetal fraction and gestational diabetes (GDM) in a cohort of women presenting for cfDNA screening for fetal aneuploidy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of women with singleton pregnancies who had cfDNA screening at a single institution at 10 to 20 weeks gestation between October 2011 and October 2017. Fetal fractions were adjusted for gestational age (GA) using multiples of the median (MoM). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of GDM controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Two thousand six hundred twenty-three pregnancies met criteria. Women with GDM had a lower fetal fraction (0.93 MoM vs. 1.05 MoM, P = .002). However, the association between fetal fraction and GDM was not significant after adjusting for body mass index (BMI) [OR 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.36; P = .48]. Since insulin resistance increases at later GAs, separate analysis on women with GA 14 to 20 weeks was performed. Again, the association between fetal fraction and GDM was not significant after adjusting for BMI, (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.31-2.12; P = .67).

CONCLUSION

Low or high fetal fraction of cfDNA was not associated with GDM. Although fetal fraction was lower among women diagnosed with GDM, this relationship was no longer statistically significant once maternal BMI was taken into account.

Antenatal screening for fetal trisomies using microarray-based cell-free DNA testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the test accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal trisomy 21, 18, and 13 using cell-free (cf) DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarray quantitation.

METHOD

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Searches in MEDLINE, Pre-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to 09.07.2018.

RESULTS

Five studies analyzing 3074 samples, including 187 trisomy 21, 43 trisomy 18, and 19 trisomy 13 cases, were identified. Risk of bias was high in all studies, introduced particularly by exclusions from analysis and by the role of the sponsor. Sensitivity of microarray-based cfDNA testing was 99.5% (95%CI 96.3%-99.9%) for trisomy 21, 97.7% (95%CI 87.9%-99.6%) for trisomy 18, and 100% (95%CI 83.2%-100%) for trisomy 13. Specificity was 100% (95% CI 99.87%-100%) for trisomy 21, 99.97% (95%CI 99.81%-99.99%) for trisomy 18, and 99.97% (95%CI 99.81%-99.99%) for trisomy 13. Pooled test failure rate was 1.1%. A direct comparison of microarray- and sequencing-based cfDNA found equivalent test accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Included studies suggest that NIPT using microarray-based cfDNA testing has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fetal trisomy 21, 18, and 13. However, the evidence base is small and at high risk of bias.

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing beyond Trisomies

The last decade has seen incredible advances in the genetic era, in next-generation sequencing of cell-free DNA in the maternal plasma, detecting abnormal fetal chromosomes. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has showed increased sensitivity and specificity for Down syndrome superior to any other screening test. Technical advances have made possible the detection of other conditions which does not necessarily mean clinical benefit for the patient. Private laboratories have added multiple conditions in the panel of NIPT, but some of these abnormalities are so rare, that their prevalence is not even clear. Data regarding clinical performance of extended NIPT is lacking. Implementation of such a test has to be carefully weighed, and not only the benefits but also the harm should be taken into account.

Could high levels of cell-free DNA in maternal blood be associated with maternal health and perinatal outcomes?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the maternal and foetal factors affect higher cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels and to investigate a possible relationship between high cfDNA levels and adverse perinatal outcomes. From a total of 4594 women who underwent non-invasive prenatal testing from January 2016 to March 2018 in our hospital, 112 women had high levels of cfDNA, which was not appropriate for testing. Maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes were compared between patients with high levels of cfDNA and normal levels of cfDNA. Patients with high levels of cfDNA had greater risks than patients with normal cfDNA levels of pregnancy complications but no statistically significant difference was found. Patients with high cfDNA levels had higher foetal death rates with a statistically significant difference (9.8% versus 1.8%, p = .024). An increase in foetal death could be expected in patients with increased cfDNA levels; therefore, these patients should be carefully followed up during pregnancy.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat's already known about this topic? Most studies about cfDNA levels are focussed on the foetal fraction. There are new arguments about maternal health and cfDNA. It is known that autoimmune diseases as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and maternal obesity increase cell turnover. There are also clinical studies suggesting a relationship between low molecular weight heparin therapy and the amount of cfDNA.What do the results of this study add? This is the first study evaluating the maternal and foetal biological factors affecting cfDNA concentrations and investigating the possible relationship between high cfDNA levels and adverse perinatal outcomes in patients with high levels of cfDNA compared to patients with normal levels of cfDNA. In the present study, it was found that an increase in foetal death could be expected in patients with higher cfDNA levels.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? If potential effects and underlying causes of increased cfDNA could be explained, cfDNA might be used as a biomarker for adverse perinatal outcomes.

Cell-Free Fetal DNA in the Early and Late First Trimester

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to investigate the association between maternal and fetal characteristics and the fetal fraction at 8-14 weeks' gestation, with emphasis on the change in the fetal fraction upon repeat sampling.

METHOD

One sample for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing was collected at the same time as the biochemical markers for combined first trimester screening (visit 1) and another at the nuchal translucency scan (visit 2). Chromosome-selective cfDNA analysis was performed on frozen plasma.

RESULTS

Overall, 321 women were included at visit 1, and 307 had a repeat blood sampling. A fetal fraction was obtained in 532 samples (238 samples with repeat fetal fraction). The fetal fraction decreased with maternal BMI (p < 0.001), was lower in Asian women (p = 0.03), and increased with β-hCG levels (p < 0.001) and gestational age (p = 0.04). Before 10 weeks' gestation, the fetal fraction was lower (p = 0.02), as was the probability of a sufficient fetal fraction (p = 0.03) after adjustment for maternal BMI. Asian women had a higher increase in fetal fraction upon repeat sampling (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Before 10 weeks' gestation, the fetal fraction is significantly lower but seems to increase more rapidly compared to later gestations. Presently, combined first trimester screening with cfDNA testing should not include samples before 10 weeks' gestation.

The failure of non-invasive prenatal testing due to maternal dermatomyositis

We experienced a case of a pregnant woman who failed to obtain a result from NIPT, due to the high level of total cell-free DNA. A subsequent ultrasound examination discovered that the fetus had severe intrauterine growth restriction, so the woman decided to abort the baby. At the same time, the woman developed slight swelling and tenderness of the proximal interphalangeal and meta-carpophalangeal joints. At first, these symptoms were not noticed, but, when the pregnant woman was admitted to the hospital, her laboratory tests were seriously abnormal, such as serum lactate dehydrogenase (640U/L), creatine phosphor kinase (4525U/L), kinase isoenzyme MB (170U/L), and a hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (398U/L). The patient had no other symptoms at this time. Misoprostol and subsequent forceps curettage were used for the induced abortion, a 167-g female fetus was aborted. Fetal skin tissue was taken for chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and placenta (biopsied in four places and tested as two composite samples) were taken for postnatal karyotyping to exclude a confined placental mosaicism, chromosomal microarray analysis of the fetal skin tissue revealed that the karyotype was 46, XX, karyotyping of placenta (100 cells) gave results of 46, XX, no abnormalities were detected. Ten days after induction, the patient had developed progressive symmetric muscle weakness in the proximal extremities. Physical examination revealed Gottron's sign and erythema. A manual muscle test showed weakness of the muscles (4/5) of her proximal extremities. Electromyography showed myogenic impairment. After excluding the possibility of neoplasia, the patient was diagnosed with dermatomyositis.

First-trimester screening for trisomies by cfDNA testing of maternal blood in singleton and twin pregnancies: factors affecting test failure

OBJECTIVE

To examine factors affecting the rate of failure to obtain a result from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing of maternal blood for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in singleton and twin pregnancies in the first trimester.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 23 495 singleton and 928 twin pregnancies undergoing screening for fetal trisomy by targeted cfDNA testing at 10 + 0 to 14 + 1 weeks' gestation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine significant predictors of failure to obtain a result after first sampling.

RESULTS

There was no result from cfDNA testing after first sampling in 3.4% (798/23 495) of singletons, 11.3% (91/806) of dichorionic twins and 4.9% (6/122) of monochorionic twins. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the risk of test failure, first, increased with increasing maternal age (odds ratio (OR), 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) and weight (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.05), decreasing gestational age (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.91), serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) multiples of the median (MoM) (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.49-0.65) and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) MoM (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74), second, was higher in women of black (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.33-2.20) and South Asian (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.56-2.52) than those of white racial origin, in dichorionic twin than in singleton pregnancy (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.34-2.26) and in pregnancies conceived by in-vitro fertilization than in those conceived naturally (OR, 3.82; 95% CI, 3.19-4.55) and, third, was lower in parous than in nulliparous women (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55-0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal age, weight, racial origin and parity, gestational age, dichorionicity, method of conception and serum levels of free β-hCG and PAPP-A are independent predictors of cfDNA test failure. The risk of test failure is higher in dichorionic twin than in singleton pregnancies, mainly because a higher proportion of twins are conceived by in-vitro fertilization and more of the women are nulliparous. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Can cell-free DNA testing be used in pregnancies with isolated fetal omphalocele? Preliminary evidence from cytogenetic results of prenatal cases

Objective: To evaluate whether cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing could replace an invasive procedure in pregnancies with isolated fetal omphalocele.Study design: This was a retrospective study of all pregnancies with sonographically detected fetal omphalocele at three tertiary referral centers between 2012 and 2016. Invasive diagnostic testing was performed for genetic investigations using conventional karyotyping or chromosomal microarray. cfDNA testing was assumed to be offered to patients with isolated fetal omphalocele for screening for common aneuploidies.Results: Invasive genetic testing was performed in a total of 107 pregnancies with a fetal omphalocele. Abnormal karyotype was found in 66% (31/47) of nonisolated omphalocele cases and in 1.7% (1/60) of isolated omphalocele cases. No pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in 59 cases with isolated omphalocele and normal karyotype. If cfDNA screening was used in cases with isolated omphalocele, the affected fetus with trisomy 18 would be detected, and no rare chromosomal aberrations or submicroscopic pathogenic CNVs would be missed.Conclusions: cfDNA testing could be recommended for prenatal genetic evaluation in pregnancies with isolated fetal omphalocele after thorough pretest counseling.Key Message: A very low percentage of aneuploidies and rare chromosomal/subchromosomal abnormalities are found in prenatal cases of isolated omphalocele. It seems that for pregnancies with isolated omphalocele, cfDNA testing represents an alternative for patients who choose to continue the pregnancies and are reluctant to undertake invasive diagnostic testing.

Autoimmune disorders but not heparin are associated with cell-free fetal DNA test failure

Background

Recent studies have suggested a possible association between heparin treatment at the time of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing and a non-reportable result. However, these studies lack of proper methodology and had a low level of proof to firmly incriminate heparin. Our objective was to investigate further the relationship between heparin treatment and cfDNA test results.

Methods

Two complementary approaches were used for the demonstration. First, we conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients with a singleton pregnancy, screened for aneuploidies by using cfDNA, but with a non-reportable cfDNA result. We included patients between 2013 and 2016 including the patients from the DEPOSA study as controls. CfDNA testing was performed by massive parallel sequencing by using a whole-genome approach. A multiple logistic regression was used to account for the influence of the variables included. Second, we performed in vitro experiments on mimic samples containing increased concentrations of heparin.

Results

Of 9867 singleton pregnancies tested during the inclusion period, 58 (0.59%) had a non-reportable result and were compared to 295 control patients. Fifteen (25.9%) and 20 (6.8%) patients were treated with heparin in the group with a non-reportable cfDNA result and with a successful assay, respectively. In multivariable analysis, an increased calculated risk at the first-trimester combined screening (OR 28.8 CI 9.76–85.15, p < 0.001), maternal weight (OR 1.03, CI 1.01–1.06, p = 0.01), and the presence of an autoimmune disease (OR 10.38, CI 1.62–66.53, p = 0.01) were the only characteristics associated with a non-reportable result. In vitro experiments showed that heparin had no impact on fetal fraction measurement or the final result, no matter what the dose tested.

Conclusions

Treatment by heparin had no impact on cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies, while the presence of an autoimmune disorder is an independent predictor of a non-reportable result.

Association between fetal fraction on cell-free DNA testing and first-trimester markers for pre-eclampsia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between fetal fraction on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing and first-trimester markers for pre-eclampsia, and to investigate the possible association of low fetal fraction with increased risks for pre-eclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including all women with a singleton pregnancy who had risk calculation for PE and FGR between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks' gestation and who also had cfDNA as a primary or secondary screening test for chromosomal abnormalities at any gestational age at two fetal medicine clinics in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia, between March 2013 and May 2017. Logarithmically transformed fetal fraction results were adjusted for gestational age and maternal characteristics. Associations with mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), placental growth factor (PlGF), and risks for PE < 34 weeks, PE < 37 weeks and FGR < 37 weeks were analyzed using correlation analysis and univariable and multivariable linear regressions.

RESULTS

In total, 4317 singleton pregnancies that underwent cfDNA testing with fetal fraction reported were included. Significant prediction of fetal fraction was provided by gestational age, conception by in-vitro fertilization, maternal age, body mass index, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, South Asian ethnicity and being parous without history of PE or FGR. Fetal fraction was associated inversely with MAP and UtA-PI and associated positively with PAPP-A and PlGF. The lower the fetal fraction, the higher were the risks for PE < 34 weeks, PE < 37 weeks and FGR < 37 weeks (P < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant association between fetal fraction result and first-trimester markers for adverse pregnancy outcome. Low fetal fraction is associated with an increased risk for pregnancy complication, but its capacity to act an as independent first-trimester marker in an algorithm for screening for PE and FGR requires further research. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

[What are the real purpose and scope of screening for aneuploidy?]

In France, the recommended method for Down syndrome screening is the first trimester combined test, the risk assessment, based on maternal age, ultrasound measurement of fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum markers (free β-hCG and PAPP-A). The Down syndrome detection rate is 78.7% at a screen positive rate of 5%. However, the best screening test is the integrated test using a combination of first trimester combined test and second trimester quadruple test (serum α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, unconjugated E₃, and dimeric inhibin-A) and being able to achieve a detection rate for Down syndrome of approximately 96% at a screen-positive rate of 5%. In recent years, the isolation of small fragments of "fetal" cell-free DNA in the maternal blood dramatically changed the screening strategy paradigm allowing a Down syndrome detection rate and false positive rate of 99.2 and 0.09%, respectively. However, aneuploidy screening based on cell-free DNA presents two major limitations which must be taken into account because they considerably limit its benefit: (i) not every woman will receive an interpretable result and that those who fail to receive a result are at increased risk for fetal aneuploidy: whether an inconclusive result is treated as screen positive or screen negative affects the overall detection rate (sensitivity) and false-positive rate (specificity) of the test; (ii) the limited number of targeted aneuploidies (trisomies 21, 18, 13 and common sex chromosome aneuploidies) in contrast to conventional noninvasive screening which is also able to detect rare aneuploidies, duplications, deletions, and other structural rearrangements. Of course, genetic counseling has to include a discussion about benefits and limitations of aneuploidy screening based on cell-free DNA. However, it should not be considered as a new screening test to substitute for conventional noninvasive screening. Moreover, if the ultimate goal is to deliver the most information about potential risk of various chromosomal abnormalities associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, then current cell-free DNA screening strategies may not be the best approach. These data highlight the limitations of cell-free DNA screening and the importance of a clear and fair information during pretest genetic counseling about benefits and limitations of any prenatal noninvasive screening (whether conventional or by cell-free DNA), but also about risks and benefits of invasive diagnostic procedures (in first- or second-line), especially since the cytogenetic analysis with chromosomal microarray analysis has improved the detection of genome microdeletions and microduplications (variants of the copy number) that can not be detected by standard cytogenetic analysis.