Sex-dependent pharmacological profiles of the synthetic cannabinoid MMB-Fubinaca

Assessment of pharmacological effects and abuse potential of 5F-EDMB-PICA, CUMYL-PEGACLONE, and NM-2201 in mice

RATIONALE

The newly emerging synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) 5F-EDMB-PICA, CUMYL-PEGACLONE, and NM-2201 have been observed to produce effects by activating cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors. Nevertheless, the pharmacological effects and potential for abuse of these three substances remain to be studied. These substances have yet to be regulated in many countries.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the safety, pharmacological effects, rewarding effects, and cannabinoid withdrawal of 5F-EDMB-PICA, CUMYL-PEGACLONE, and NM-2201.

METHODS

This study evaluated the drug safety and the cannabinoid-specific pharmacological effects of the three substances through acute toxicity experiments (in which the LD50 of each substance was obtained) and tetrad experiments (comprising assessments of hypothermia, analgesia, locomotion inhibition, and catalepsy). Furthermore, the conditioned place preference (CPP) experiments and withdrawal experiments were conducted to evaluate the rewarding effect and cannabinoid withdrawal potential of the substances in question.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that all three drugs exhibited certain acute toxic effects and could potentially induce tetrad effects. The data were analyzed using non-linear regression, and the corresponding ED50 values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained. The rank order of potency was determined to be CUMYL-PEGACLONE > 5F-EDMB-PICA > NM-2201. In the CPP experiments, it was demonstrated that 5F-EDMB-PICA significantly induced an increase in CPP score at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg, while NM-2201 caused an increase in CPP score and a significant aversion effect at a dose of 2 and 3 mg/kg, respectively. It is noteworthy that all three types of SCs were observed to produce a significant biphasic effect, indicating that CPP scores were biphasic for all compounds. Following the administration of the CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant, a notable increase in head twitches and paw tremors was observed, indicating that these three SCs induce cannabinoid withdrawal through the mediation of CB1 receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicated that these SCs possess cannabinoid-specific pharmacological effects and abuse potential, which provides substantial experimental data to support the future regulation of these substances.

The impact of piperazine and antipsychotic co-exposures and CB1 blockade on the effects elicited by AMB-FUBINACA, a synthetic cannabinoid, in mice

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

The constant emergence and broad toxicological effects of synthetic cannabinoids create a discernible public health threat. The synthetic cannabinoid AMB-FUBINACA (AMB-FUB) is a potent agonist at the CB1 receptor and has been associated with numerous fatalities. Synthetic cannabinoids are commonly abused alongside other drugs and medications, including a "party pill" drug, para-fluorophenylpiperazine (pFPP), and the antipsychotic risperidone. This research aimed to investigate the mechanisms underpinning AMB-FUB toxicity and the impact of clinically relevant co-exposures in vivo.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Male and female C57Bl/6 mice received a single dose of AMB-FUB (3 or 6 mg kg-1), pFPP (10 or 20 mg kg-1) or vehicle intraperitoneally. Mice were co-exposed to AMB-FUB (3 mg kg-1) and pFPP (10 mg kg-1) or risperidone (0.5 mg kg-1) to investigate these drug combinations. To study receptor-dependency and potential rescue of AMB-FUB toxicity, rimonabant (3 mg kg-1) was administered both pre- and post-AMB-FUB. Adverse effects caused by drug administration, including hypothermia and convulsions, were recorded.

KEY RESULTS

AMB-FUB induced CB1-dependent hypothermia and convulsions in mice. The combination of AMB-FUB and pFPP significantly potentiated hypothermia, as did risperidone pre-treatment. Interestingly, risperidone provided significant protection from AMB-FUB-induced convulsions in female mice. Pre- and post-treatment with rimonabant was able to significantly attenuate both hypothermia and convulsions in mice administered AMB-FUB.

CONCLUSION & IMPLICATIONS

Factors such as dose, CB1 signalling, and substance co-exposure significantly contribute to the toxicity of AMB-FUBINACA. Mechanistic understanding of synthetic cannabinoid toxicity and fatality can help inform overdose treatment strategies and identify vulnerable populations of synthetic cannabinoid users.

A Systematic Study of the In Vitro Pharmacokinetics and Estimated Human In Vivo Clearance of Indole and Indazole-3-Carboxamide Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists Detected on the Illicit Drug Market

In vitro pharmacokinetic studies were conducted on enantiomer pairs of twelve valinate or tert-leucinate indole and indazole-3-carboxamide synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) detected on the illicit drug market to investigate their physicochemical parameters and structure-metabolism relationships (SMRs). Experimentally derived Log D_7.4 ranged from 2.81 (AB-FUBINACA) to 4.95 (MDMB-4en-PINACA) and all SCRAs tested were highly protein bound, ranging from 88.9 ± 0.49% ((R)-4F-MDMB-BINACA) to 99.5 ± 0.08% ((S)-MDMB-FUBINACA). Most tested SCRAs were cleared rapidly in vitro in pooled human liver microsomes (pHLM) and pooled cryopreserved human hepatocytes (pHHeps). Intrinsic clearance (CL_int) ranged from 13.7 ± 4.06 ((R)-AB-FUBINACA) to 2944 ± 95.9 mL min⁻¹ kg⁻¹ ((S)-AMB-FUBINACA) in pHLM, and from 110 ± 34.5 ((S)-AB-FUBINACA) to 3216 ± 607 mL min⁻¹ kg⁻¹ ((S)-AMB-FUBINACA) in pHHeps. Predicted Human in vivo hepatic clearance (CL_H) ranged from 0.34 ± 0.09 ((S)-AB-FUBINACA) to 17.79 ± 0.20 mL min⁻¹ kg⁻¹ ((S)-5F-AMB-PINACA) in pHLM and 1.39 ± 0.27 ((S)-MDMB-FUBINACA) to 18.25 ± 0.12 mL min⁻¹ kg⁻¹ ((S)-5F-AMB-PINACA) in pHHeps. Valinate and tert-leucinate indole and indazole-3-carboxamide SCRAs are often rapidly metabolised in vitro but are highly protein bound in vivo and therefore predicted in vivo CL_H is much slower than CL_int. This is likely to give rise to longer detection windows of these substances and their metabolites in urine, possibly as a result of accumulation of parent drug in lipid-rich tissues, with redistribution into the circulatory system and subsequent metabolism.