FISH analysis of selected soft tissue tumors: Diagnostic experience in a tertiary center

MDM2 FISH testing criteria in adipose tissue tumors with mature adipocytic morphology - A resection case-based study

The current criteria for utilizing MDM2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in adipose-derived tumors were first introduced in 2015 and have been widely adopted. However, these criteria may fail to identify some atypical lipomatous tumors / well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL) with mature adipocytic morphology in clinical practice, possibly due to the fact that the existing criteria are primarily based on biopsy cases. Hence, a criterion based on resection cases is needed. In this study, we included 87 adipose tissue tumors with mature adipocytic morphology which were first resected, as well as 9 consultation cases and 25 recurrent resection cases. The final diagnosis was based on MDM2 amplification status. Among the 87 first-time resection cohort, MDM2 FISH amplification was observed in only 2 (5%) of the 39 superficial cases. Marginal infiltration was significantly different in both the MDM2 FISH negative and positive groups (p < 0.05). Of the 37 intramuscular tumors, 17 (46%) showed MDM2 FISH amplification. The MDM2 amplification positive group had a larger tumor size than MDM2 amplification negative group (p = 0.042). Tumors of larger size (≥11 cm) were highly correlated with MDM2 amplification (p = 0.003), but still, 35.3% of the MDM2 amplification-positive cases had tumor sizes less than 11 cm. Eight (66.7%) out of twelve retroperitoneal/ pelvic cases were MDM2 FISH positive. Among the 25 recurrent cases, twenty (80%) of them had MDM2 FISH amplification. In conclusion, we recommend MDM2 FISH for: 1. superficial cases with marginal infiltration based on adequate margin sampling; 2. all intramuscular tumors, retroperitoneal/pelvic tumors and recurrent tumors, both in resection cases and biopsy cases.

FISH Diagnostic Assessment of MDM2 Amplification in Liposarcoma: Potential Pitfalls and Troubleshooting Recommendations

MDM2 amplification represents the leading oncogenic pathway and diagnostic hallmark of liposarcoma, whose assessment is based on Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) analysis. Despite its diagnostic relevance, no univocal interpretation criteria regarding FISH assessments of MDM2 amplification have been established so far, leading to several different approaches and potential diagnostic misinterpretations. This study aims to address the most common issues and proposes troubleshooting guidelines for MDM2 amplification assessments by FISH. We retrospectively retrieved 51 liposarcomas, 25 Lipomas, 5 Spindle Cell Lipoma/Pleomorphic Lipomas, and 2 Atypical Spindle Cell Lipomatous Tumors and the corresponding MDM2 FISH analysis. We observed MDM2 amplification in liposarcomas cases only (43 out of 51 cases) and identified three MDM2-amplified patterns (scattered (50% of cases), clustered (14% of cases), and mixed (36% of cases)) and two nonamplified patterns (low number of signals (82% of cases) and polysomic (18% of cases)). Based on these data and published evidence in the literature, we propose a set of criteria to guide MDM2 amplification analysis in liposarcoma. Kindled by the compelling importance of MDM2 assessments to improve diagnostic and therapeutic liposarcoma management, these suggestions could represent the first step to develop a univocal interpretation model and consensus guidelines.

Molecular classification of soft tissue sarcomas for adequate diagnosis: A study on the northeast population of Morocco

Background

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of tumors. For adequate therapeutic management, an accurate diagnosis is necessary. In Morocco, the diagnosis is essentially based on the morphological and immunohistochemical study. Compared to other techniques, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is easier to develop and less expensive. This study aims to assess the feasibility and utility of implementing FISH technique to improve diagnostic accuracy and establish a good classification.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective cohort study. 211 cases of mesenchymal tumors were included. Hematoxylin Eosin Safran (HES) staining was performed in all cases followed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). FISH was performed in all cases with suspected STS. The probes used were EWSR1, MDM2 and SS18. The performance of FISH and histopathological test were evaluated by the ROC curve method (receiver operating characteristic). We evaluated the concordance between FISH and real time PCR by Cohen test.

Results

The real-time PCR technique showed good agreement with the FISH test by a Kappa coefficient of 60% (p = 0.035). FISH was able to confirm that it is more accurate (Youden's Index = 91%) than histological/immunohistochemical analysis (Youden's Index = 51%), as well as the positive predictive value was higher (100%) with an ROC curve finding a larger area under the curve of 0.953 (95% CI: 0.918-0.988), p = 0.000 which supports that FISH shows high performance to present an accurate final diagnosis.

Conclusion

This is the first and the largest Moroccan series for the molecular diagnosis of STS by FISH. Our study shows that paraffin FISH is a sensitive and specific ancillary tool in the diagnosis of STS when used in the appropriate clinicopathological context.

Solitary primary pulmonary synovial sarcoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is an uncommon and highly malignant soft tissue sarcoma in the clinic, with primary pulmonary SS (PPSS) being extremely rare. Here, we describe the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of a solitary PPSS case confirmed via surgical resection and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

CASE SUMMARY

A 33-year-old man was admitted because of intermittent coughing and hemoptysis for one month, with lung shadows observed for two years. Whole-body positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) revealed a solitary mass in the upper lobe of the right lung, with uneven radioactivity uptake and a maximum standardized uptake value of 5.6. The greyish-yellow specimen obtained following thoracoscopic resection was covered with small multi-nodulated structures and consisted of soft tissue. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed spindle-shaped malignant tumor cells. Immunohistochemistry indicated these tumor cells were CD99 and BCL-2-positive. Furthermore, the FISH test revealed synovial sarcoma translocation genetic reassortment, which confirmed the diagnosis of SS.

CONCLUSION

PPSS is extremely rare and tends to be misdiagnosed as many primary pulmonary diseases. PET-CT, histologic analysis, and FISH tests can be used to differentiate PPSS from other diseases. Surgical resection is regularly recommended for the treatment of solitary PPSS and is helpful for improving the prognosis.

Heat-induced antigen retrieval in fluorescence in situ hybridization: An effective approach enhancing signal intensity in poor-quality FFPE sections

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) serves as an ancillary tool for assessing chromosomal abnormalities and is important in differential diagnoses and treatment decisions. In clinical practice, pathologists encounter unsatisfactory formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections exhibiting weak fluorescence signals, mostly due to inappropriate tissue processing or preservation, leading to interpretation difficulties. For the present study, FFPE samples for which conventional FISH failed were collected. Instead of a pretreatment step using a commercial kit, heat-induced antigen retrieval (HIAR) was introduced using either citrate buffer or Tris-EDTA buffer, while the subsequent experimental workflow remained unchanged. After HIAR-assisted FISH, the hybridization efficiency and signal intensity were markedly enhanced and no difference in signal adequacy was observed when comparing the effect of the two AR solutions. The present study demonstrated that HIAR is a reliable tool for FISH, particularly for poor-quality FFPE sections yielding weak or no fluorescence signals in the conventional analysis.

The Biology of Synovial Sarcoma: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives

New molecular insights are being achieved in synovial sarcoma (SS) that can provide new potential diagnostic and prognostic markers as well as therapeutic targets. In particular, the advancement of research on epigenomics and gene regulation is promising. The concrete hypothesis that the pathogenesis of SS might mainly depend on the disruption of the balance of the complex interaction between epigenomic regulatory complexes and the consequences on gene expression opens interesting new perspectives. The standard of care for primary SS is wide surgical resection combined with radiation in selected cases. The role of chemotherapy is still under refinement and can be considered in patients at high risk of metastasis or in those with advanced disease. Cytotoxic chemotherapy (anthracyclines, ifosfamide, trabectedin, and pazopanib) is the treatment of choice, despite several possible side effects. Many possible drug-able targets have been identified. However, the impact of these strategies in improving SS outcome is still limited, thus making current and future research strongly needed to improve the survival of patients with SS.

Lessons learnt from MDM2 fluorescence in-situ hybridisation analysis of 439 mature lipomatous lesions with an emphasis on atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma lacking cytological atypia

AIMS

Amplification of the murine double minute-2 (MDM2) gene, which is usually detected with fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH), is the key driving event for atypical lipomatous tumours (ALTs)/well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLs). We sought to determine the concordance between the histopathological findings and MDM2 FISH in the diagnosis of ALT/WDL, and to identify the histological features of MDM2-amplified tumours lacking classic atypia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all mature lipomatous lesions subjected to MDM2 FISH analysis at our institution. MDM2 FISH analysis was performed on 439 mature lipomatous lesions: 364 (82.9%) were negative and 75 (17%) were positive. In 17 of 75 (22.6%) ALTs/WDLs, cytological atypia was not identified on initial histological assessment, thus favouring lipoma. On review, these cases shared common histological features, consisting of a very low number of relatively small stromal cells within the tumour lobules, with mildly coarse chromatin and oval nuclei, admixed with unremarkable adipocytes in a tumour background devoid of fibroconnective septa, areas of fibrosis, or blood vessels. These cells matched the cells in which FISH showed MDM2 amplification. In contrast, 13 cases (3.5%) regarded as suspicious for ALT/WDL on the basis of histology lacked MDM2 amplification and were reclassified following the FISH findings.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that a subset of lipoma-like ALTs/WDLs are not associated with any of the features typically described in ALT/WDL. Our study also showed that tumours >100 mm are more likely to be ALT/WDL; however, a history of recurrence or concerning clinical/radiological features was not significantly associated with classification as ALT/WDL.

Usefulness of SS18-SSX antibody as a diagnostic marker for pulmonary metastatic synovial sarcoma

Background

The novel SS18-SSX fusion-specific antibody is reported to have high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of primary synovial sarcoma (SS), which often metastasizes to the lung. Thus far, no study has validated the diagnostic efficacy of SS18-SSX antibody for pulmonary metastatic SS. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the usefulness of the SS18-SSX antibody in the diagnosis of pulmonary metastatic SS.

Methods

We evaluated the immunohistochemistry of SS18-SSX fusion-specific antibody (E9X9V) in 10 pulmonary metastatic SS cases and the corresponding five primary sites (four limbs and one mediastinum) in five patients, for whom SS was already diagnosed and confirmed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the metastatic and primary sites, and in 93 clinical and histologic mimics including 49 non-SS, pulmonary metastatic sarcomas, 39 primary lung cancers, and five intrathoracic solitary fibrotic tumors. All specimens were surgically resected at Shinshu University Hospital during 2001–2019. For primary and metastatic SS, we also evaluated SS18-SSX immunohistochemistry using needle biopsy and touch imprint cytology specimens from the primary site.

Results

SS18-SSX staining was diffusely-strongly positive in all 10 pulmonary metastatic SS cases and the corresponding five primary sites; whereas, it was negative in all 93 clinical and histologic mimics (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity). Further, SS18-SSX staining was also sufficiently positive in the biopsy and cytology specimens.

Conclusions

Immunohistochemistry of the SS18-SSX fusion-specific antibody is useful for the differential diagnosis of pulmonary metastatic SS in clinical practice. This simple and reliable method has the potential to replace traditional genomic tests. However, further studies are warranted in this regard.

DNA damage-inducible transcript 3 immunohistochemistry is highly sensitive for the diagnosis of myxoid liposarcoma but care is required in interpreting the significance of focal expression

AIMS

Myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) is characterised by DNA damage-inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3) gene rearrangements, confirmation of which is commonly used diagnostically. Recently, DDIT3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been reported to be highly sensitive and, when strict criteria are employed, specific for the diagnosis of MLPS. The aim of this study was to independently investigate DDIT3 IHC as a diagnostic marker for MLPS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

DDIT3 IHC was performed on 52 MLPS and on 152 mimics on whole sections, and on 515 non-MLPS sarcomas in tissue microarray format. Only one MLPS (which had undergone acid-based decalcification) was completely negative. With inclusion of this case if any nuclear expression is considered to indicate positivity, the overall sensitivity of DDIT3 is 98% (51 of 52 cases) and the specificity is 94% (633 of 667 non-MLPS cases are negative). If a cut-off of >10% of neoplastic cells is required for positivity, then the sensitivity remains 98% (51/52) and the specificity is 98.5% (657 of 667 non-MLPS cases are negative). If a cut-off of >50% of cells is required for positivity, then the sensitivity is 96% (50 of 52 cases) but the specificity improves to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Diffuse nuclear DDIT3 expression occurs in the overwhelming majority of MLPSs, and can be used to confirm the diagnosis in most cases without the need for molecular testing. A complete absence of expression argues strongly against MLPS, and almost completely excludes this diagnosis, particularly if there is consideration of technical factors such as decalcification. The significance of focal DDIT3 expression should be interpreted in the morphological and clinical context, although most tumours showing only focal expression are not MLPS.

Primary Intrathoracic Sarcomas: A Review of Cross-sectional Imaging and Pathology

The most common sarcomas in the thorax are metastasis from an extrathoracic primary malignancy. Primary intrathoracic sarcomas are rare albeit aggressive malignancies that are diagnosed on histopathology. Although a few imaging characteristics have been described that are common to sarcomas, it is still a diagnosis of exclusion as other tumors are much more common. Like elsewhere, primary thoracic sarcomas are also classified according to their histologic features. They are a rare group of tumors that can arise from the mediastinal structures, lung, pleura, or chest wall. On imaging, differentiating these from more common malignancies like lung cancer is difficult and often requires multimodality workup and tissue sampling. A few sarcomas are very specific to their locations, such as angiosarcoma in the right atrium, leiomyosarcoma in the pulmonary artery, where imaging has high accuracy for the diagnosis. Despite being nonspecific in a majority of cases, imaging plays a pivotal role in determining the organ of origin, tumor extent, invasion of adjacent structures, and thus help to assess the surgical resectability. Although sarcomas arising from chest wall are the most common primary sarcomas in the chest, they are excluded from this review to focus only on primary intrathoracic sarcomas. The article provides a comprehensive imaging and pathology review of the rare primary intrathoracic sarcomas, including but not limited to angiosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, malignant transformation of fibrous tumor of pleura, sarcomatoid mesothelioma, leiomyosarcoma, and malignant small round blue cell tumors.Key points:Primary intrathoracic sarcomas are rare but clinically important.Imaging helps to determine local extent, invasion, metastases and appropriate site/mode of biopsy.Role of pathology is paramount in diagnosis and guiding treatment based on immunogenetic/molecular typing.

When used together SS18-SSX fusion-specific and SSX C-terminus immunohistochemistry are highly specific and sensitive for the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma and can replace FISH or molecular testing in most cases

AIMS

Synovial sarcoma is defined by recurrent t(X;18)(p11;q11) translocations creating SS18-SSX1, SS18-SSX2 or SS18-SSX4 fusions. Recently, a novel rabbit monoclonal antibody designed to identify these fusions (SS18-SSX, clone E9X9V) was proposed to be highly specific (100%), but not completely sensitive (95%) for this diagnosis. Another antibody designed to identify the C-terminal end of SSX (SSX_CT, clone E5A2C) was proposed to be highly sensitive (100%), but not completely specific (96%). We sought to validate these antibodies in an independent cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed immunohistochemistry for SS18-SSX and SSX_CT on 39 synovial sarcoma samples from 25 patients with confirmed gene rearrangements. Thirty-four (87%) and 36 (92%) were positive for SS18-SSX and SSX_CT, respectively. False-negative staining was associated with suboptimally handled small biopsies and decalcified specimens, even when staining was diffuse and strong in subsequent optimally processed excisions and non-decalcified areas. None of 580 non-synovial sarcoma tumours (76 whole sections, 504 TMA samples) were positive for SS18-SSX (100% specificity), whereas 39 (93% specificity) were positive for SSX_CT.

CONCLUSIONS

SS18-SSX fusion-specific IHC is 87-95% sensitive for the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma and highly (perhaps perfectly) specific. Therefore, positive SS18-SSX staining definitively confirms the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma. SSX_CT is less specific (93-96%) but highly sensitive (92%, but approaching 100% when suboptimally processed biopsies and decalcified specimens are excluded). Negative SSX_CT staining may therefore have an ancillary role as a rule-out test for synovial sarcoma. We caution that both antibodies are prone to false-negative staining in decalcified specimens.