Pirfenidone in restrictive allograft syndrome after lung transplantation: A case series

Advances in lung transplantation: 60 years on

Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment for advanced lung disease, improving survival and quality of life. Over the last 60 years all aspects of lung transplantation have evolved significantly and exponential growth in transplant volume. This has been particularly evident over the last decade with a substantial increase in lung transplant numbers as a result of innovations in donor utilization procurement, including the use donation after circulatory death and ex-vivo lung perfusion organs. Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust, and therefore the donor pool is actually larger than previously thought. Parallel to this, lung transplant outcomes have continued to improve with improved acute management as well as microbiological and immunological insights and innovations. The management of lung transplant recipients continues to be complex and heavily dependent on a tertiary care multidisciplinary paradigm. Whilst long term outcomes continue to be limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction improvements in diagnostics, mechanistic understanding and evolutions in treatment paradigms have all contributed to a median survival that in some centres approaches 10 years. As ongoing studies build on developing novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment of transplant complications and improvements in donor utilization more individuals will have the opportunity to benefit from lung transplantation. As has always been the case, early referral for transplant consideration is important to achieve best results.

Results from randomized trial of pirfenidone in patients with chronic rejection (STOP-CLAD study)

PURPOSE

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading long-term cause of poor outcomes after transplant and manifests by fibrotic remodeling of small airways and/or pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis. This study evaluated the effect of pirfenidone on quantitative radiographic and pulmonary function assessment in patients with CLAD.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of pirfenidone in patients with CLAD. Randomization was stratified by CLAD phenotype. The primary outcome for this study was change in radiographic assessment of small airways disease, quantified as percentage of lung volume using parametric response mapping analysis of CT scans (PRMfSAD); secondary outcomes included change in FEV1, change in FVC, and change in radiographic quantification of parenchymal disease (PRMPD). Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the treatment effect on outcome measures.

RESULTS

The goal enrollment of 60 patients was not met due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with 23 patients included in the analysis. There was no significant difference over the study period between the pirfenidone vs. placebo groups with regards to the observed change in PRMfSAD (+4.2% vs. -0.4%; p=0.22), FEV1 (-3.5% vs. -3.6%; p=0.97), FVC (-1.9% vs. -4.6%; p = 0.41), or PRMPD (-0.6% vs. -2.5%; p=0.30). The study treatment tolerance and adverse events were generally similar between the pirfenidone and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pirfenidone had no apparent impact on radiographic evidence of allograft dysfunction or pulmonary function decline in a single-center randomized trial of CLAD patients that did not meet enrollment goals, but had an acceptable tolerance and side effect profile.

Everolimus Treatment for Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction in Lung Transplantation

Our study aims to evaluate the effect of everolimus treatment on lung function in lung transplant (LT) patients with established chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).

METHODS

This retrospective study included LT patients in two reference LT units who started everolimus therapy to treat CLAD from October 2008 to October 2016. We assessed the variation in the maximum forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) before and after the treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included in this study. The variation in the FEV1 was -102.7 (149.6) mL/month before starting everolimus compared to -44.7 (109.6) mL/month within the first three months, +1.4 (63.5) mL/month until the sixth month, and -7.4 (46.2) mL/month until the twelfth month (p < 0.05). Glomerular filtrate remained unchanged after everolimus treatment [59.1 (17.5) mL/min per 1.73 m2 at baseline and 60.9 (19.6) mL/min per 1.73 m2, 57.7 (20.5) mL/min per 1.73 m2, and 57.3 (17.8) mL/min per 1.73 m2, at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively] (p > 0.05). Everolimus was withdrawn in 22 (38.6%) patients. The median time to withdrawal was 14.1 (5.5-25.1) months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed an improvement in FEV1 decline in patients with CLAD treated with everolimus. However, the drug was withdrawn in a high proportion of patients.

Late-Onset Exudative Pleural Effusions Without Concomitant Airway Obstruction or Lung Parenchymal Abnormalities: A Novel Presentation of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) is an aggressive variant of CLAD characterized by progressive restrictive ventilatory decline and persistent pleuro-parenchymal changes that can be seen on chest CT. We identified four lung transplant recipients with a progressive restrictive ventilatory defect due to lymphocyte-predominant exudative pleural effusions, but no pleuro-parenchymal abnormalities typical of RAS. Using molecular analysis, we also found increased levels of previously described immune markers of RAS, including NFkB, 20S proteasome, lipocalin, TNFα, and TGFβ, within the circulating small extracellular vesicles of the remaining living lung transplant recipient. Despite the absence of lung parenchymal changes, these patients had a poor prognosis with rapid deterioration in allograft function and no response to pleural-based interventions such as thoracentesis, decortication, and pleurodesis. We hypothesize that these cases represent a distinct CLAD phenotype characterized by progressive restriction due to pleural inflammation, lymphocyte-predominant pleural effusion, resultant compressive atelectasis, and eventual respiratory failure in the absence of lung parenchymal involvement.

[Chronic lung allograft dysfunction in 2022, past and updates]

INTRODUCTION

While short-term results of lung transplantation have improved considerably, long-term survival remains below that achieved for other solid organ transplants.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE

The main cause of late mortality is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which affects nearly half of the recipients 5 years after transplantation. Immunological and non-immune risk factors have been identified. These factors activate the innate and adaptive immune system, leading to lesional and altered wound-healing processes, which result in fibrosis affecting the small airways or interstitial tissue. Several phenotypes of CLAD have been identified based on respiratory function and imaging pattern. Aside from retransplantation, which is possible for only small number of patients, no treatment can reverse the CLAD process.

PERSPECTIVES

Current therapeutic research is focused on anti-fibrotic treatments and photopheresis. Basic research has identified numerous biomarkers that could prove to be relevant as therapeutic targets.

CONCLUSION

While the pathophysiological mechanisms of CLAD are better understood than before, a major therapeutic challenge remains.

Conventional and Novel Approaches to Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation

Most therapeutic advances in immunosuppression have occurred over the past few decades. Although modern strategies have been effective in reducing acute cellular rejection, excess immunosuppression comes at the price of toxicity, opportunistic infection, and malignancy. As our understanding of the immune system and allograft rejection becomes more nuanced, there is an opportunity to evolve immunosuppression protocols to optimize longer term outcomes while mitigating the deleterious effects of traditional protocols.

Early onset of azithromycin to prevent CLAD in lung transplantation: Promising results of a retrospective single centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Azithromycin (AZI) may be an effective immune modulator in lung transplant (LT) recipients, and can decrease chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) rates, the leading cause of mortality after the 1st year post-LT. The aim of the study is to assess the effect of AZI initiation and its timing on the incidence and severity of CLAD in LT recipients.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study, including LT recipients from 01/01/2011 to 30/06/2020. Four groups were established: those who started AZI at the 3rd week post-LT (group A), those who received AZI later than the 3rd week post-LT and had preserved FEV1 (B), those who did not receive AZI (C) and those who started AZI due to a decline in FEV1 (D). The dosage of AZI prescribed was 250 mg three times per week. CLAD was defined and graduated according to the 2019 ISHLT criteria.

RESULTS

We included 358 LT recipients: 139 (38.83%) were in group A, 94 (26.25%) in group B, 91 (25.42%) in group C, and 34 (9.50%) in group D. Group A experienced the lowest CLAD incidence and severity at 1 (p = .01), 3 (p < .001), and 5 years post-LT, followed by Group B. Groups C and D experienced a higher incidence and severity of CLAD (p = .015). Initiation of AZI prior to FEV1 decline (Groups A and B) proved to be protective against CLAD after adjusting for differences between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Early initiation of AZI in LT recipients could have a role in decreasing the incidence and severity of CLAD. In addition, as long as FEV1 is preserved, initiating AZI at any time could also be useful to prevent the incidence of CLAD and reduce its severity.

Pharmacotherapy of chronic lung allograft dysfunction post lung transplantation

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the primary cause of death in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) in spite of improvements in immunosuppression management. Despite advances in knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of CLAD, treatments that are currently available are usually ineffective and delay progression of disease at best. There are currently no evidence-based guidelines for the optimal treatment of CLAD, and management varies widely across transplant centers. Additionally, there are minimal publications available to summarize data for currently available therapies and outcomes in LTRs. We identified the major domains of the medical management of CLAD and conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases to identify articles published from inception to December 2021 related to CLAD in LTRs. Studies published in English pertaining to the pharmacologic prevention and treatment of CLAD were included; highest priority was given to prospective, randomized, controlled trials if available. Prospective observational and retrospective controlled trials were prioritized next, followed by retrospective uncontrolled studies, case series, and finally case reports if the information was deemed to be pertinent. Reference lists of qualified publications were also reviewed to find any other publications of interest that were not found on initial search. In the absence of literature published in the aforementioned databases, additional articles were identified by reviewing abstracts presented at the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation and American Transplant Congress annual meetings between 2010-2021. This document serves to provide a comprehensive review of the literature and considerations for the prevention and medical management of CLAD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: current management and future directions

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) may develop after either lung or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with similarities in histopathological features and clinical manifestations. However, there are differences in the contributory factors and clinical trajectories between the two conditions. BOS after HSCT occurs due to systemic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), whereas BOS after lung transplantation is limited to the lung allograft. BOS diagnosis after HSCT is more challenging, as the lung function decline may occur due to extrapulmonary GVHD, causing sclerosis or inflammation in the fascia or muscles of the respiratory girdle. Treatment is generally empirical with no established effective therapies. This review provides rare insights and commonalities of both conditions, that are not well elaborated elsewhere in contemporary literature, and highlights the importance of cross disciplinary learning from experts in other transplant modalities. Treatment algorithms for each condition are presented, based on the published literature and consensus clinical opinion. Immunosuppression should be optimised, and other conditions or contributory factors treated where possible. When initial treatment fails, the ultimate therapeutic option is lung transplantation (or re-transplantation in the case of BOS after lung transplantation) in carefully selected candidates. Novel therapies under investigation include aerosolised liposomal cyclosporine, Janus kinase inhibitors, antifibrotic therapies, and (in patients with BOS after lung transplantation) B-cell–directed therapies. Effective novel treatments that have a tangible impact on survival and thereby avoid the need for lung transplantation or re-transplantation are urgently required.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is a syndrome of progressive lung function decline, subcategorized into obstructive, restrictive, and mixed phenotypes. The trajectory of CLAD is variable depending on the phenotype, with restrictive and mixed phenotypes having more rapid progression and lower survival. The mechanisms driving CLAD development remain unclear, though allograft injury during primary graft dysfunction, acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and infections trigger immune responses with long-lasting effects that can lead to CLAD months or years later. Currently, retransplantation is the only effective treatment.

Management of chronic rejection after lung transplantation

Outcomes after lung transplantation are limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). The incidence of CLAD is high, and its clinical course tends to be progressive over time, culminating in graft failure and death. Indeed, CLAD is the leading cause of death beyond the first year after lung transplantation. Therapy for CLAD has been limited by a lack of high-quality studies to guide management. In this review, we will discuss the diagnosis of CLAD in light of the recent changes to definitions and will discuss the current clinical evidence available for treatment. Recently, the diagnosis of CLAD has been subdivided into bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). The current evidence for treatment of CLAD mainly revolves around treatment of BOS with more limited data existing for RAS. The best supported treatment to date for CLAD is the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin which has been associated with a small improvement in lung function in a minority of patients. Other therapies that have more limited data include switching immunosuppression from cyclosporine to tacrolimus, fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux, montelukast, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), aerosolized cyclosporine, cytolytic anti-lymphocyte therapies, total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) and the antifibrotic agent pirfenidone. Most of these treatments are supported by case series and observational studies. Finally, we will discuss the role of retransplantation for CLAD.

Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation is an area devoid of robust clinical data. This chapter will review the history of immunosuppression in lung transplantation. Additionally, it will evaluate the three classes of induction, maintenance, and rescue immunosuppression in detail. Induction immunosuppression in lung transplantation aims to decrease incidence of lung allograft rejection, however infectious risk must be considered when determining if induction is appropriate and which agent is most favorable. Similar to other solid organ transplant patient populations, a multi-drug approach is commonly prescribed for maintenance immunosuppression to minimize single agent drug toxicities. Emphasis of this review is placed on key medication considerations including dosing, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Clinical considerations will be reviewed per drug class given available literature. Finally, acute cellular, antibody mediated, and chronic rejection are reviewed.

Antithymocyte Globulin Treatment for Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction in Lung Transplant Recipients: Experience From a National Reference Transplant Center

BACKGROUND

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of mortality after the first year of transplantation and treatments can have little impact on CLAD progression in some cases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in lung transplant recipients with CLAD.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients from our center that had undergone a lung transplant between 2008 and 2019 and selected those with CLAD who were treated with ATG. The closest lung function (forced expiratory volume in the first second) to the ATG administration was recorded, as well as the values 3, 6, and 12 months before and after treatment. We followed and recorded survival during the 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients with CLAD received ATG treatment. A favorable positive response to treatment (improvement or stabilization on lung function) was achieved in half of the patients. Most patients (71%) who responded well to ATG were in CLAD stage 1 to 2. The fall slope of forced expiratory volume in the first second is better after treatment. The median survival was 27 months, and we found a trend toward better survival in early CLAD stages 1 to 2. There were also differences in survival between rapid decliners and nonrapid decliners.

CONCLUSIONS

ATG treatment could play a role in patient with CLAD who do not respond to conventional therapies. The effect of cytolytic therapy with ATG is clearly better in those patients in early stages, with little effect in those in CLAD stage 3.

Diagnostic Yield of 18F-FDG PET After Lung Transplantation: A Single-center, Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the diagnostic yield of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort study including 234 18F-FDG PET examinations in 199 lung transplant recipients. Indication for PET referral, 18F-FDG PET diagnosis/findings and final clinical diagnosis were classified into 3 groups: malignancy, infection/inflammation not otherwise specified, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction with restrictive allograft syndrome phenotype. Sensitivity/specificity analysis was performed to determine accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in each group.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET for malignancy was 91.4% (95% confidence interval, 82.5%-96.0%) and specificity was 82.3% (95% confidence interval, 74.5%-88.1%). Infection/inflammation not otherwise specified and restrictive allograft syndrome as indication for 18F-FDG PET comprised relatively small groups (14 and 31 cases, respectively). In addition, 18F-FDG PET revealed clinically relevant incidental findings in 15% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Referral for 18F-FDG PET after lung transplantation mainly occurred to confirm or rule out malignancy. In this specific setting, 18F-FDG PET has a high diagnostic yield. Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET for other indications is less clear, given small sample sizes. Clinically relevant diagnoses, unrelated to the primary indication for 18F-FDG PET, are found relatively often in this immunocompromised cohort.

Antifibrotic drugs in lung transplantation and chronic lung allograft dysfunction: a review

This review aims to provide an overview of pre-transplant antifibrotic therapy on peri-transplant outcomes and to address the possible role of antifibrotics in lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction.Lung transplantation is an established treatment modality for patients with various end-stage lung diseases, of which idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases are growing indications. Theoretically, widespread use of antifibrotics prior to lung transplantation may increase the risk of bronchial anastomotic complications and impaired wound healing.Long-term graft and patient survival are still hampered by development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, on which antifibrotics may have a beneficial impact.Antifibrotics until the moment of lung transplantation proved to be safe, without increasing peri-transplant complications. Currently, best practice is to continue antifibrotics until time of transplantation. In a large multicentre randomised trial, pirfenidone did not appear to have a beneficial effect on lung function decline in established bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. The results of antifibrotic therapy in restrictive allograft syndrome are eagerly awaited, but nonrandomised data from small case reports/series are promising.

Advances in lung transplantation for interstitial lung diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung transplantation (LTx) is increasingly used as ultimate treatment modality in end-stage interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). This review aims to give an overview of the latest evolutions in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last two years, important new findings regarding LTx outcomes in specific ILD entities have been reported. More data are available on optimization of pre-LTx management of ILD patients especially with regard to pretransplant antifibrotic treatment.

SUMMARY

LTx is the only treatment option with curative intent for ILDs and is increasingly used for this indication. Several studies have now reported adequate outcomes in different ILD entities, although outcome is shown to be affected by underlying telomeropathies. As new studies could not replicate inferior survival with single compared with double LTx, both options remain acceptable. ILD specialists can beneficially impact on post-LTx outcome by optimizing pre-LTx management: corticosteroids should be avoided, antifibrotics should be initiated whenever possible and BMI and nutritional status optimized, rehabilitation and depression-screening strategies should be implemented in all LTx candidates, as these interventions may all improve postlung transplant survival.

Connective Tissue Growth Factor Is Overexpressed in Explant Lung Tissue and Broncho-Alveolar Lavage in Transplant-Related Pulmonary Fibrosis

Background

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is an important mediator in several fibrotic diseases, including lung fibrosis. We investigated CTGF-expression in chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and pulmonary graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

Materials and Methods

CTGF expression was assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry in end-stage CLAD explant lung tissue (bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), n=20; restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS), n=20), pulmonary GHVD (n=9). Unused donor lungs served as control group (n=20). Next, 60 matched lung transplant recipients (BOS, n=20; RAS, n=20; stable lung transplant recipients, n=20) were included for analysis of CTGF protein levels in plasma and broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluid at 3 months post-transplant, 1 year post-transplant, at CLAD diagnosis or 2 years post-transplant in stable patients.

Results

qPCR revealed an overall significant difference in the relative content of CTGF mRNA in BOS, RAS and pulmonary GVHD vs. controls (p=0.014). Immunohistochemistry showed a significant higher percentage and intensity of CTGF-positive respiratory epithelial cells in BOS, RAS and pulmonary GVHD patients vs. controls (p<0.0001). BAL CTGF protein levels were significantly higher at 3 months post-transplant in future RAS vs. stable or BOS (p=0.028). At CLAD diagnosis, BAL protein content was significantly increased in RAS patients vs. stable (p=0.0007) and BOS patients (p=0.042). CTGF plasma values were similar in BOS, RAS, and stable patients (p=0.74).

Conclusions

Lung CTGF-expression is increased in end-stage CLAD and pulmonary GVHD; and higher CTGF-levels are present in BAL of RAS patients at CLAD diagnosis. Our results suggest a potential role for CTGF in CLAD, especially RAS, and pulmonary GVHD.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Evolving Concepts and Therapies

The primary factor that limits long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD continues to evolve. Consensus definitions of CLAD and the major CLAD phenotypes were recently updated and clarified, but it remains to be seen whether the current definitions will lead to advances in management or impact care. Understanding the potential differences in pathogenesis for each CLAD phenotype may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including precision medicine. Recognition of CLAD risk factors may lead to earlier interventions to mitigate risk, or to avoid risk factors all together, to prevent the development of CLAD. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, novel therapeutics aimed at both prevention and treatment are currently under investigation. We provide an overview of the updates to CLAD-related terminology, clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential strategies to treat and prevent CLAD.

Restrictive allograft syndrome after lung transplantation

Despite recent advances over the past decade in lung transplantation including improved surgical technique and immunotherapy, the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lung allograft dysfunction remains a significant barrier to recipient survival. Aside from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, a restrictive phenotype called restrictive allograft syndrome has recently been recognized and affects up to 35% of all patients with CLAD. The main characteristics of RAS include a persistent and unexplained decline in lung function compared to baseline and persistent parenchymal infiltrates on imaging. The median survival after diagnosis of RAS is 6 to 18 months, significantly shorter than other forms of CLAD. Treatment options are limited, as therapies used for BOS are typically ineffective at halting disease progression. Specific medications such as fibrinolytics are lacking large, multicenter prospective studies. In this manuscript, we discuss the definition, mechanism, and characteristics of RAS while highlighting the similarities and differences between other forms of CLAD. We also review the diagnoses along with current and potential treatment options that are available for patients. Finally, we discuss the existing knowledge gaps and areas for future research to improve patient outcomes and understanding of RAS.

A Review of Pirfenidone as an Anti-Fibrotic in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Its Probable Role in Other Diseases

Fibrosis is the result of chronic inflammation and is known to pathologically occur in many organs and systems. Pirfenidone (PFD) is an anti-fibrotic known for its use in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In addition to being an anti-fibrotic, it acts as an anti-inflammatory and antioxidant as well. There have been studies on PFD in other diseases, some clinical and others preclinical. We have compiled and reviewed them to highlight just how widespread PFD use could be. Among many benefits of PFD in IPF, PFD has effectively improved patients' survival in those who had an acute exacerbation of IPF and has reduced respiratory-related hospitalization, among few others. PFD also has shown an improvement in vital capacity in patients with chronic hypersensitive pneumonitis. Also, it has demonstrated anti-fibrotic effects in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. In other diseases outside the lungs, PFD has reversed insulin resistance and proven to be effective in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). It has prevented blindness post-alkali injury to the eye and has proven to decrease the proliferation of mesothelioma cells, just to name a few. This review encourages further research in connection with PFD and its use in other diseases and PFD pros in IPF.

Lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by relentlessly progressive lung function impairment that is consistently fatal in the absence of lung transplantation, as no curative pharmacological treatment exists. The pace of progression varies across patients, and acute life-threatening exacerbations occur unpredictably, causing further sharp drops in lung function. Recently introduced antifibrotic agents slow the pace of disease progression and may improve survival but fail to stop the fibrotic process. Moreover, the magnitude and kinetics of the response to these drugs cannot be predicted in the individual patient. These characteristics require that lung transplantation be considered early in the course of the disease. However, given the shortage of donor lungs, lung transplantation must be carefully targeted to those patients most likely to benefit. Current guidelines for lung transplantation listing may need reappraisal in the light of recent treatment advances. Patients with IPF often have multiple comorbidities such as coronary heart disease, frailty, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Consequently, extensive screening for and effective treatment of concomitant conditions is crucial to appropriate candidate selection and outcome optimisation. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory. Pulmonologists with expertise in IPF must work closely with lung transplant teams. Careful consideration must be given to preoperative optimisation, surgical technique, and pulmonary rehabilitation to produce the best post-transplantation outcomes.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: light at the end of the tunnel?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has been recently introduced as an umbrella-term encompassing all forms of chronic pulmonary function decline posttransplant with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome as the most important subtypes. Differential diagnosis and management, however, remains complicated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Herein, we provide an overview of the different diagnostic criteria (pulmonary function, body plethysmography and radiology) used to differentiate bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome, their advantages and disadvantages as well as potential problems in making an accurate differential diagnosis. Furthermore, we discuss recent insights in CLAD management and treatment and advances in the search for accurate biomarkers of CLAD.

SUMMARY

Careful dissection of CLAD phenotypes is of utmost importance to assess patient prognosis, but uniform diagnostic criteria are desperately needed. There is a long way ahead, but the first steps towards this goal are now taken; tailored individualized therapy will be the golden standard to treat CLAD in the future, but randomized placebo-controlled and multicentre trials are needed to identify new and powerful therapeutic agents.

Lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease with a poor prognosis. Lung transplantation is the only intervention shown to increase life expectancy for patients with IPF, but it is associated with disease-specific challenges. In this Review, we discuss the importance of a proactive approach to the management of IPF comorbidities, including gastro-oesophageal reflux, pulmonary hypertension, coronary artery disease, and malignancy. With a donor pool too small to meet demand and unacceptably high mortality on transplant waiting lists, we discuss different systems used internationally to facilitate organ allocation. We explore the rapidly evolving landscape of transplantation for patients with IPF with regards to antifibrotic therapy, technological advances in extracorporeal life support, advances in understanding of the genetics of the disease, and the importance of a holistic multidisciplinary approach to care. Finally, we consider potential advances over the next decade that are envisaged to improve transplantation outcomes in patients with advanced IPF.