Understanding the impact of HLA molecular mismatch in solid organ transplantation: Are we there yet?

Understanding HLA-DQ in renal transplantation: a mini-review

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching, particularly with HLA-DQ, significantly impacts the development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and transplant outcomes. HLA-DQ antibodies are highly immunogenic and detrimental, necessitating advanced high-resolution HLA typing to improve mismatch assessment and clinical risk evaluation. Traditional serological or low-resolution typing often misclassifies mismatches, leading to inaccuracies in assessing immunogenicity and predicting outcomes. Emerging molecular mismatch algorithms refine immunogenicity assessments by analyzing amino acid differences and structural interactions. These tools show promise for personalizing transplant protocols but have limitations, such as variability in predicting individual patient outcomes. Immunogenicity of mismatches also depends on evolutionary divergence and specific amino acid differences, with studies revealing that certain evolutionary lineages and polymorphisms influence T-cell alloreactivity and DSA development. Complexities in HLA-DQ protein expression, including combinatorial diversity of heterodimers and inter-isotypic heterodimers, further complicate risk evaluation. Expression levels, influenced by tissue specificity and inflammatory stimuli, and alternative splicing of HLA-DQ transcripts add additional layers of variability. Future clinical applications, enabled by high-resolution HLA typing, may include refined graft selection, improved DSA monitoring, and individualized therapy. However, understanding the precise mechanisms of HLA-DQ immunogenicity remains a priority for advancing transplantation science and enhancing patient outcomes.

Improving long-term kidney allograft survival by rethinking HLA compatibility: from molecular matching to non-HLA genes

Optimizing immunologic compatibility in organ transplantation extends beyond the conventional approach of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) antigen matching, which exhibits significant limitations. A broader comprehension of the roles of classical and non-classical HLA genes in transplantation is imperative for enhancing long-term graft survival. High-resolution molecular HLA genotyping, despite its inherent challenges, has emerged as the cornerstone for precise patient-donor compatibility assessment. Leveraging understanding of eplet biology and indirect immune activation, eplet mismatch calculators and the PIRCHE-II algorithm surpass traditional methods in predicting allograft rejection. Understanding minor histocompatibility antigens may also present an opportunity to personalize the compatibility process. While the application of molecular matching in deceased donor organ allocation presents multiple technical, logistical, and conceptual barriers, rendering it premature for mainstream use, several other areas of donor-recipient matching and post-transplant management are ready to incorporate molecular matching. Provision of molecular mismatch scores to physicians during potential organ offer evaluations could potentially amplify long-term outcomes. The implementation of molecular matching in living organ donation and kidney paired exchange programs is similarly viable. This article will explore the current understanding of immunologic matching in transplantation and the potential applications of epitope and non-epitope molecular biology and genetics in clinical transplantation.

The Impact of Donor and Recipient Genetic Variation on Outcomes After Solid Organ Transplantation: A Scoping Review and Future Perspectives

At the outset of solid organ transplantation, genetic variation between donors and recipients was recognized as a major player in mechanisms such as allograft tolerance and rejection. Genome-wide association studies have been very successful in identifying novel variant-trait associations, but have been difficult to perform in the field of solid organ transplantation due to complex covariates, era effects, and poor statistical power for detecting donor-recipient interactions. To overcome a lack of statistical power, consortia such as the International Genetics and Translational Research in Transplantation Network have been established. Studies have focused on the consequences of genetic dissimilarities between donors and recipients and have reported associations between polymorphisms in candidate genes or their regulatory regions with transplantation outcomes. However, knowledge on the exact influence of genetic variation is limited due to a lack of comprehensive characterization and harmonization of recipients' or donors' phenotypes and validation using an experimental approach. Causal research in genetics has evolved from agnostic discovery in genome-wide association studies to functional annotation and clarification of underlying molecular mechanisms in translational studies. In this overview, we summarize how the recent advances and progresses in the field of genetics and genomics have improved the understanding of outcomes after solid organ transplantation.