Delayed/non-union of upper limb fractures with bisphosphonates: systematic review and recommendations

Comparison of reconstruction nails versus dual implants in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures in adults: a meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures. This meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness of reconstruction nails and dual implants in treating ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures to provide a basis for decision-making when selecting the optimal approach.

METHODS

Relevant articles were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases using the keywords "neck of femur", "shaft" and "fracture fixation" from inception until November 17, 2022. The screening process of the studies was conducted independently by two assessors, who assessed each study's eligibility and two assessors assessed the quality. Then compared differences in outcome measures using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of ten retrospective cohort studies were included. There were no significant differences in union time, union rate, union-related complications (malunion, nonunion, delayed union) of femoral neck and shaft fractures, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and functional outcomes (Friedman-Wyman scoring system) (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our pooled estimates indicated that reconstruction nails and dual implants for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures could yield satisfactory surgical results, and that there is no difference between the two treatment methods.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This meta-analysis was registered on the PROSPERO website (registration number: CRD42022379606).

Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment of Atypical Ulnar Fractures Associated With Prolonged Bisphosphonate Therapy: Multicenter Case Analysis

PURPOSE

Atypical ulnar fracture (AUF) related to prolonged bisphosphonate therapy is a rare complication. We propose diagnostic criteria of AUFs and present a treatment algorithm.

METHODS

Twelve AUFs in 10 patients were studied. The diagnosis of AUF was based on the case definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFF). We investigated clinical and radiographic characteristics of AUFs according to major and minor features of AFFs, and modified the case definition of an AFF to fit the characteristics of AUFs. All AUFs were treated surgically. The radiographic union of fractures was investigated, and delayed fracture healing was defined as a delay of 6 months or more.

RESULTS

The average point at which AUFs occurred was at a point 35.1% along the proximal diaphysis of the total ulnar length. All major features of AFFs were identified in the 12 AUFs. Among the minor features, generalized cortical thickening was observed in 6 AUFs, prodromal symptoms in 2 AUFs, bilateral involvement in 2 patients, and delayed fracture healing in 10 AUFs (5 delayed union, 5 nonunion). Initially, 11 of 12 AUFs were treated with plating, and 1 was treated with intramedullary nailing. Two nonunions were revised with sclerotic bone resections, bone grafts, and plate fixation. Finally, union was achieved in 9 AUFs.

CONCLUSIONS

The case definition of AFFs can be used for the diagnosis of AUFs, although some modifications must be included in the case definition. Plating is useful in managing AUFs, although sclerotic bone resections and bone grafts may be required. Atypical ulnar fractures occurred in patients who took bisphosphonates longer than AFFs or those whose bisphosphonates were discontinued a few years earlier. Therefore, physicians should be aware of AUFs in those patients and, if necessary, perform a screening test to look for atypical fractures in other bones.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic V.

Efficacy of adjuvant treatment for fracture nonunion/delayed union: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Fracture nonunion/delayed union seriously affects physical and mental health and quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of different adjuvant treatments for nonunion/delayed union by network meta-analysis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating adjuvant treatment in the management of nonunion/delayed union. A network meta-analysis reporting on healing rate, healing time, and adverse effect (AE) outcomes was conducted to assess and compare different interventions.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in the analysis. For the healing rate outcome, bone marrow aspirate (BMA) + autologous cancellous bone (ACB) was found to be significantly better than ACB alone (odds ratio: 0.12; 95% confidence interval: 0.03, 0.59). In the ranking results, BMA+ platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (96%), BMA + ACB (90%), and BMA alone (82%) showed relative advantages in the healing rate. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasonography (LIUS) intervention significantly shortened the healing time compared with ACB (SMD: -9.26; 95% CI: - 14.64, - 3.87). LIUS (100%), BMA + PRP (74%), and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) (69%) have relative advantages. Compared with the control, electromagnetic field (EMF) (OR: 13.21; 95% CI: 1.58, 110.40) and extracorporeal shock wave (ESWT) (OR: 4.90; 95% CI: 1.38, 17.43) had a higher AE risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the current intervention strategies, BMA in combination with PRP and ACB can improve the healing rate of nonunion/delayed union. LIUS can significantly shorten the healing time. EMF and ESWT may have a high risk of AE. However, large-scale, well-designed studies are still needed to confirm the results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

A roadmap to surgery in osteogenesis imperfecta: results of an international collaboration of patient organizations and interdisciplinary care teams

Background and purpose - Involvement of patient organizations is steadily increasing in guidelines for treatment of various diseases and conditions for better care from the patient's viewpoint and better comparability of outcomes. For this reason, the Osteogenesis Imperfecta Federation Europe and the Care4BrittleBones Foundation convened an interdisciplinary task force of 3 members from patient organizations and 12 healthcare professionals from recognized centers for interdisciplinary care for children and adults with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) to develop guidelines for a basic roadmap to surgery in OI.Methods - All information from 9 telephone conferences, expert consultations, and face-to-face meetings during the International Conference for Quality of Life for Osteogenesis Imperfecta 2019 was used by the task force to define themes and associated recommendations.Results - Consensus on recommendations was reached within 4 themes: the interdisciplinary approach, the surgical decision-making conversation, surgical technique guidelines for OI, and the feedback loop after surgery.Interpretation - The basic guidelines of this roadmap for the interdisciplinary approach to surgical care in children and adults with OI is expected to improve standardization of clinical practice and comparability of outcomes across treatment centers.

Effects of bisphosphonates on osteoporosis: Focus on zoledronate

Osteoporosis is a bone disease that mainly affects older people and postmenopausal women. Lack of proper treatment for this disease gives rise to many problems in patients and occasionally leads to death. Many drugs have been utilized to treat osteoporosis but the most effective one is the bisphosphonates (BPs) family. This family has several positive effects on bone tissue, including promoting bone healing, enhancing bone mineral density, reducing bone resorption, preventing pathologic fractures, suppressing bone turnover, and modulating bone remodeling. On the other hand, there have also been inconclusive reports that BPs might have a desirable or even adverse impact on osteoporotic patients. Therefore, we set out to examine the positive and negative effects of this family, with a focus on the most potent one that is zoledronate (Zol), in clinical usage. Zoledronate is an amino-BPs and nitrogen-containing drug which is the most powerful BPs on osteoporosis treatment or prevention. Many studies showed its effectiveness in the treatment of osteoporosis and bone healing. As Zol enjoys a considerable potential in treating and preventing osteoporosis, it can be used as one of the effective treatments in this field.

The analysis of alendronate action in bone fracture healing in rats

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is defined as a systemic skeletal disease characterized by reduced bone mass and degeneration of bone tissue microarchitecture which leads to bone fragility and fracture risk. Annually, 100 to 200 million people around the world are at risk for osteoporotic fractures. One way to prevent osteoporosis fracture is by using medications such as bisphosphonates. Alendronate is the most prescribed bisphosphonate in the world. The objective of this article is to evaluate the effect of alendronate on bone fracture healing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

15 adult male rats that were 60 days old were used, divided into three groups: A or Control, B (non-osteoporotic bones plus alendronate application) and C (osteoporotic bones plus alendronate application). Osteoporotic bones were compared with non-osteoporotic bones that underwent bone window creation and administration of alendronate sodium. These bones were submitted to radiographic and histological analysis.

RESULTS

All of Group A had complete bone healing, reaching the phase of bone remodeling. While in groups B and C, the rats were in the repair phase.

CONCLUSIONS

The drug alendronate interferes with delayed fracture healing and delayed bone remodeling. The article advises that studies in humans are needed in order to assess whether the alendronate interferes with bone healing.

The Effects of Long-term Use of Nitrogen-containing Bisphosphonates on Fracture Healing

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) are pharmaceutical agents that have been used for many years to treat osteoporosis, multiple myeloma, Paget's disease, metastatic bone disease, and a variety of other diseases in which bone mineral density is reduced. Given that N-BPs inhibit bone resorption, an important stage in the fracture healing process, they have been extensively studied in preclinical models for their activity. In animal models, treatment with N-BPs is associated with a larger callus formation in fracture area and delay in remodeling from primary woven bone to lamellar bone, but there is no delay in formation of the fracture callus. In humans, all existing evidence suggest that initiating treatment with N-BPs, after upper and lower limb fractures, does not appear to have a significant effect on fracture healing. Rarely, patients with long-term use of N-BPs may develop "atypical fractures" and delay in their healing. Therefore, this clinical condition is not fully understood and many questions remain unanswered. Similarly, there are few studies about the benefits of stopping a long-term treatment with them, if a fracture occurs. Although most studies support that chronic N-BP therapy may lead to fracture healing delay, this is not fully documented. On the other hand, there are studies that are in complete disagreement with them. All of the above suggest that there is a need for more detailed future research into larger patient populations and different types of fractures, with sufficient data on the type, dosage, route and duration of administration of N-BPs, and the control methods of fracture healing, in order to have a safe final conclusion on the effect of their long-term administration in this highly complex process.

Complications of open reduction and internal fixation of distal humerus fractures

Treatment of distal humerus fractures is demanding. Surgery is the optimal treatment and preoperative planning is based on fracture type and degree of comminution.

Fixation with two precontoured anatomical locking plates at 90^o:90^o orthogonal or 180^o parallel is the optimal treatment.

The main goal of surgical treatment is to obtain stable fixation to allow immediate postoperative elbow mobilization and prevent joint stiffness.

Despite evolution of plates and surgical techniques, complications such as mechanical failure, ulnar neuropathy, stiffness, heterotopic ossification, nonunion, malunion, infection, and complications from olecranon osteotomy are quite common.

Distal humerus fractures still present a significant technical challenge and need meticulous technique and experience to achieve optimal results.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:558-567. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180009

Risk factors for nonunion of bone fracture in pediatric patients: An inception cohort study of 237,033 fractures

Adult fracture nonunion risk is related to injury severity and surgical technique, yet nonunion is not fully explained by these risk factors alone; biological risk factors are also important. We test a hypothesis that risk factors associated with pediatric fracture nonunion are similar to adult nonunion risk factors.Inception cohort study in a large payer database of pediatric fracture patients (0-17 years) in the United States in calendar year 2011. Continuous enrollment in the database was required for 12 months, to allow time to capture a nonunion diagnosis. The final database collated demographic descriptors, treatment procedures as per Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, comorbidities as per International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-9) codes, and drug prescriptions as per National Drug Code Directory (Red Book) codes. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for variables associated with nonunion.Among 237,033 pediatric fractures in 18 bones, the nonunion rate was 0.85%. Increased nonunion risk was associated with increasing age, male gender, high body-mass index, severe fracture (e.g., open fracture, multiple fractures), and tobacco smoking (all, P < .0001). Nonunion rate varied with fracture location; scaphoid, neck of femur, and tibia/fibula were most likely to go to nonunion. Nonunion ORs were significantly increased for risk factors including; surgical procedure, cardiovascular disease, Vitamin D deficiency, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and opioid prescription (all, multivariable P < .001).Nonunion is rare in pediatric patients, but nonunion risk increases with increasing age. We confirm a hypothesis that risk factors for pediatric nonunion are similar to adult nonunion risk factors. Scaphoid fractures in adolescents have nearly the same risk of nonunion as in adults. Opioids should be used cautiously in pediatric patients, as they are associated with a significant and substantial elevation of nonunion risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, Retrospective, Level II.

Western Osteoporosis Alliance Clinical Practice Series: Evaluating the Balance of Benefits and Risks of Long-Term Osteoporosis Therapies

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that requires life-long strategies to reduce fracture risk. Few trials have investigated the balance of benefits and risk with long-term use of osteoporosis therapies, and fewer still have investigated the consequences of treatment discontinuation. The best available evidence suggests that up to 10 years of treatment with an oral bisphosphonate maintains the degree of fracture risk reduction observed in the 3-year registration trials. With denosumab, 10 years of therapy appears to provide fracture risk reduction similar to or better than that observed in the 3-year registration trial. Available data suggest an increasing but low risk of fractures with atypical features with increasing duration of bisphosphonate therapy. Published data linking duration of therapy to osteonecrosis of the jaw are lacking for bisphosphonates and denosumab. Other side effects associated with denosumab or bisphosphonates do not appear to be related to therapy duration. The antifracture benefits of long-term therapy with bisphosphonates and denosumab in appropriately selected patients outweigh the low risk of serious side effects.

Effect of parathyroid hormone on healing in osteoporotic fractures via a phospholipase C-independent pathway

Objective

This study was performed to investigate the effect of parathyroid hormone (PTH) on healing in osteoporotic fractures via a phospholipase C (PLC)-independent pathway and explore the mechanism of PTH-mediated bone formation.

Methods

Ninety-six 12-week-old C57BL/6J female mice underwent bilateral ovariectomy. One month later, the lower third of the femur was fractured and the mice were treated using saline, PTH(1-28), PTH(1-34), zoledronic acid (ZA), PTH(1-28)+ZA, and PTH(1-34)+ZA. The mice were killed at weeks 2 and 4 in each group. Biomechanical testing and micro-computed tomography were performed.

Results

The formation and strength of the callus increased in all but the saline group. The mice treated with PTH(1-34) showed a significantly higher ultimate bending force, bending rigidity, bone mineral density, percent bone volume, and trabecular thickness than those treated with PTH(1-28). The PTH(1-34)+ZA group demonstrated the greatest improvements in the ultimate bending force, bending rigidity, bone mineral density, and relative bone volume.

Conclusions

PTH can promote fracture healing and callus hardness in ovariectomized mice by increasing callus formation and reconstructing trabecular bone via a PLC-independent pathway. PTH combined with ZA has a cumulative effect on the healing of fractures in ovariectomized mice.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for the prediction of non-union consolidation

INTRODUCTION

Non-union perfusion can be visualized with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. This study evaluated DCE-MRI to predict non-union consolidation after surgery and detect factors that affect bone healing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2010 and 2015 non-union perfusion was prospectively quantified in 205 patients (mean age, 51.5 years, 129 men, 76 women) before intervention and at 6, 12, 26, 52 and more weeks follow-up. DCE-MRI results were related to the osseous consolidation, the ability to predict successful outcome was estimated by ROC analysis. The relevance of the body mass index (BMI) and the non-union severity score (NUSS) to the healing process was assessed.

RESULTS

Tibial (n=99) and femoral (n=76) non-unions were most common. Consolidation could be assessed in 169 patients, of these 103 (61%) showed eventual healing and demonstrated higher perfusion than in failed consolidation at 6 (p=0.0226), 12 (p=0.0252) and 26 (p=0.0088) weeks follow-up. DCE-MRI at 26 weeks follow-up predicted non-union consolidation with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 87% (false classification rate 19%). Higher BMI (p=0.041) and NUSS (p<0.0001) were associated with treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

DCE-MRI perfusion analysis after non-union surgery predicts successful outcome and could facilitate the decision of early intervention. NUSS and BMI are important prognostic factors concerning consolidation.

Fracture healing: a consensus report from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Working Group

We used the RAND UCLA appropriateness method to decide appropriateness of use of osteoporosis medication after incident fracture and potential for fracture healing and make suggestions for trial design for clinical and preclinical research.

PURPOSE

To develop appropriateness criteria to assist in the use and study of osteoporosis medications in patients with recent fracture and in the potential use of osteoporosis medications to enhance delayed fracture healing. To promote further research by suggesting preclinical and clinical trial design for studies where fracture healing is the endpoint.

DESIGN

RAND/UCLA appropriateness method (RUAM).

PARTICIPANTS

A panel of experts, both members and non-members of the International Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Working Group, were identified consisting of geriatricians, rheumatologists, orthopedists, endocrinologists, and internists. This resulted in a round 1 panel of 15 panelists, round 2 panel of 15 members, and a round 3 panel of 14 members.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Agreement on statements and scenarios using RUAM. Three rounds of voting by panelists took place. Agreement in a third round was reached for 111 statements and scenarios, measured by median panel ratings and the amount of dispersion of panel ratings, based on the interpercentile range.

RESULTS

An expert panel validated a set of statements and scenarios about the use of osteoporosis medications after incident fracture and use of these medications to enhance delayed fracture healing and made recommendations for study designs to investigate the effect of osteoporosis medications on fracture healing.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of this exercise is intended to assist in improving patient care by identifying the appropriateness of use of osteoporosis medications after fracture and in fracture healing and to make suggestions for further preclinical and clinical research.

Distal humerus fractures: a review of current therapy concepts

Fractures of the distal humerus in the adult comprise approximately one third of all humeral fractures. Successful management of distal humerus fractures depends on correct reduction of the fracture, reconstruction of the articular surface if needed, stability and rigidity of the fixation, and appropriate rehabilitation. In this review, we evaluated the available literature and highlighted current therapy concepts. We assessed the evolution of internal fixation and elbow arthroplasty focusing on the established surgical approaches against the background of a growing incidence of distal humeral fractures in an aging patient population. Therefore evaluating the aspect and influence of age-dependent comorbidities like osteoporosis on successful treatment.

How do bisphosphonates affect fracture healing?

Bisphosphonates (BPs) have been in use for many years for the treatment of osteoporosis, multiple myeloma, Paget's disease, as well as a variety of other diseases in which there is reduced bone mineral density. Given that bisphosphonates inhibit bone resorption, an important stage of fracture healing; this class of compounds has been widely studied in preclinical models regarding their influence on fracture healing. In animal models, bisphosphonate treatment is associated with a larger fracture callus, coincident with a delay in remodeling from primary woven bone to lamellar bone, but there is no delay in formation of the fracture callus. In humans, de novo use of bisphosphonate therapy after fracture does not appear to have a significant effect on fracture healing. Rarely, patients with long term use of Bisphosphonates may develop an atypical fracture and delay in fracture healing has been observed. In summary, bisphosphonates appear safe for use in the setting of acute fracture management in the upper and lower extremity in humans. While much remains unknown about the effects on healing of long-term bisphosphonates, use prior to "typical" fracture, in the special case of atypical fracture, evidence suggests that bisphosphonates negatively influence healing.

The use of bisphosphonates in pediatrics

Bisphosphonates are widely used for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adulthood. In the last years, bisphosphonates have been increasingly used in pediatric patients for the treatment of a growing number of disorders associated with osteoporosis, resistant hypercalcemia or heterotopic calcifications. The use of bisphosphonates in pediatric patients has been proven safe; however, the risk of potential severe consequences into adulthood should be kept in mind. Well-defined criteria for bisphosphonates treatment in pediatric patients are not specified, therefore an accurate selection of patients who could benefit from bisphosphonates is mandatory. A strict follow-up of pediatric patients receiving long-term bisphosphonate therapy is strongly recommended. The purpose of this mini review is to provide a summary of current knowledge on some main general aspects of the structure, mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and bioavailability of bisphosphonates, and to focus on the latest advances of bisphosphonate treatment in pediatric patients. Particular attention has been paid to the common and potential adverse effects of bisphosphonate treatment, and some suggestions concerning the clinical approach and general measures for bisphosphonate treatment in pediatric patients are reported.

Timing of the initiation of bisphosphonates after surgery for fracture healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

SUMMARY

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Early administration of bisphosphonates (BPs) after surgery did not appear to delay fracture healing time either radiologically or clinically. Furthermore, the anti-resorptive efficacy of BPs given immediately after surgical repair should positively affect the rate of subsequent fractures.

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are widely used in the prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. However, early administration of BPs after surgical repair of a fracture may limit the reserve capacity of bone to heal. The aim of this review and meta-analysis was to analyze the benefits and adverse effects of early administration of BPs and give recommendations regarding when BPs should be utilized.

METHODS

We identified randomized controlled trials comparing the early administration of BPs to placebo, delayed BP treatment, or no therapy in adult patients after surgery. The search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 2888 patients were included. Four trials used alendronate, three trials used zoledronic, two trials used risedronate, and one trial used etidronate. Early administration of BPs was considered less than 3 months after surgery. Patients treated with BP therapy had no significant differences in radiological fracture healing times compared with patients in the control group (mean difference [MD] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.75 to 3.69). There were also no significant differences in the rate of delay or nonunion of fracture healing (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.50). However, the bone mineral density (BMD) of total hips did significantly improve after 12 months of treatment with BPs. And most bone turnover markers of patients in the study group were significantly decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Early administration of BPs after surgery did not appear to delay fracture healing time either radiologically or clinically. Furthermore, according to the changes in BMD and bone turnover markers, the anti-resorptive efficacy of BPs given immediately after surgical repair should positively affect the rate of subsequent fractures.