1
|
Zequi SDC, de Oliveira Galvão A, Costa Matos A, Laurino Almeida G, Esteves Chaves Campos M, Wroclawski ML, Camelo Mourão T, Eduardo Matheus W, Carneiro A, Modesto de Sousa Neto A, Meneses A, Dauster B, Cezar Chade D, Cortez Vieira da Silva Neto D, Silveira Brazão Jr É, Café Cardoso Pinto E, Faria E, de Almeida e Paula F, Lott F, Korkes F, Meyer F, Hidelbrando Alves Mota Filho F, Mascarenhas F, Betoni Guglielmetti G, Veloso Coaracy GA, Guimarães GC, Franco Carvalhal G, Luiz Pereira J, Koifman L, Fornazieri L, Nogueira L, Teixeira Batista L, Favorito LA, Araújo LH, Lima de Oliveira Leal M, Tobias-Machado M, Cordeiro M, Murce Rocha M, Carvalho Leão Filho NJ, Ribeiro Meduna R, Beluco Corradi R, de Lima Favaretto R, Machado R, Borges dos Reis R, de Carvalho Fernandes R, Espinheira Santos V, Pinheiro De Oliveira V, Henriques da Costa W, Busato WFS, Soares A. Renal cell cancer treatment: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) surgery-focused consensus update. Ther Adv Urol 2025; 17:17562872241312581. [PMID: 40290783 PMCID: PMC12033548 DOI: 10.1177/17562872241312581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/30/2025] Open
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 2.2% of all malignancies worldwide; however, its mortality rate is not negligible. Surgery is the primary treatment for most nonadvanced cases, with its indications and techniques evolving over the years. To provide an update on RCC management in Brazil, focusing on surgery. The Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group-Genitourinary Section and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group gathered a panel of Brazilian urologists and clinical oncologists to vote on and discuss the best management of surgically resectable RCC. The experts compared the results with the literature and graded them according to the level of evidence. For small renal masses (SRMs; less than 4 cm), biopsy is indicated for specific/select cases, and when intervention is needed, partial nephrectomy should be prioritized. Radical nephrectomy and ablative techniques are exceptions for managing SRMs. Patients with small tumors (less than 3 cm), slow tumor growth, or a risk for surgery may benefit from active surveillance. Localized carcinoma up to 7 cm in diameter should be treated preferably with partial nephrectomy. Lymphadenectomy and adrenalectomy should be performed in locally advanced cases if involvement is suspected by imaging exams. Patients with venous tumor thrombi usually require surgical intervention depending on the extent of the thrombus. Neoadjuvant therapy should be considered for unresectable cases. Even in the era of targeted therapy, cytoreductive nephrectomy still has a role in metastatic disease. Metastasectomy is indicated for most patients with resectable disease. This consensus presents recommendations for surgical treatment of RCC based on expert opinions and evidence from the medical literature. Surgery remains the best curative option for nonadvanced cases, and it still has a role for select patients with metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stênio de Cássio Zequi
- AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Professor Antônio Prudente, 211, Liberdade, São Paulo, SP 01509-010, Brazil
- National Institute for Science and Technology in Oncogenomics and Therapeutic Innovation, São Paulo, Brazil
- Urology, Graduate School, São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, Brazil
- Latin American Renal Cancer Group, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - André Costa Matos
- Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
- Hospital Aliança—Rede D’Or São Luiz, Salvador, Brazil
- Hospital São Rafael—Rede D’Or São Luiz, Salvador, Brazil
| | | | - Marcelo Esteves Chaves Campos
- Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Rede MaterDei de Saúde, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Langer Wroclawski
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
- Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil
- BP—A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Arie Carneiro
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Breno Dauster
- Hospital São Rafael—Rede D’Or São Luiz, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Daher Cezar Chade
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Felipe Lott
- Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Fernando Meyer
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | | | - Frederico Mascarenhas
- Hospital Aliança—Rede D’Or São Luiz, Salvador, Brazil
- Hospital São Rafael—Rede D’Or São Luiz, Salvador, Brazil
| | | | | | - Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães
- BP—A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Lucas Nogueira
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Lucas Teixeira Batista
- Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
- Hospital Cardio Pulmonar—Rede D’Or São Luiz, Salvador, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Mauricio Cordeiro
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Nilo Jorge Carvalho Leão Filho
- Hospital Mater Dei Salvador, Salvador, Brazil
- Obras Sociais Irmã Dulce, Salvador, Brazil
- Instituto Baiano de Cirurgia Robótica, Salvador, Brazil
- Hospital Municipal de Salvador, Salvador, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrey Soares
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
- Centro Paulista de Oncologia/Oncoclínicas, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leitão TP, Corredeira P, Rodrigues C, Piairo P, Miranda M, Cavaco A, Kucharczak S, Antunes M, Peixoto S, dos Reis JP, Lopes T, Diéguez L, Costa L. A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Release of Circulating Tumor and Mesenchymal Cells in No-Touch Radical Nephrectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3601. [PMID: 39518041 PMCID: PMC11545310 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2024] [Revised: 10/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may be the missing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) biomarker. No-touch (NT) resection has shown benefit in several tumors. METHODS A randomized controlled trial comparing CTC and circulating mesenchymal cell (CMC) release in no-touch (NT) vs. conventional (C) laparoscopic RN. Blood samples were collected at operation room arrival (S0), specimen extraction (S1), postoperative D1, and D30. CTCs were isolated and analyzed using RUBYchip™. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were included. No significant differences were found between groups in CTC and CMC counts, count variations between time points, complications, and survival. The total circulating cell detection rates in the NT, C, and overall RCC groups were 58.3%, 80.0%, and 70.4% at S0; 41.6%, 86.7%, and 66.7% at S1; 50.0%, 64.3%, and 60.0% at D1; and 54.5%, 42.9%, and 44.0% at D30, respectively. A progressive decrease in CMCs was observed in the C group after surgery, especially at D1 (4.78 to 1.64 CMCs/7.5 mL blood, p = 0.035). Healthy controls had no circulating cells; however, high CMC counts were found in chronic inflammation controls and oncocytoma patients, with no significant difference from RCC patients (p = 0.460). CONCLUSIONS NT RN did not reduce circulating cell release nor improve survival compared to C RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tito Palmela Leitão
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.C.); (C.R.); (A.C.); (S.K.); (L.C.)
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
- Urology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, ULS Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Patrícia Corredeira
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.C.); (C.R.); (A.C.); (S.K.); (L.C.)
| | - Carolina Rodrigues
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.C.); (C.R.); (A.C.); (S.K.); (L.C.)
- International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, 4715-330 Braga, Portugal; (P.P.); (L.D.)
| | - Paulina Piairo
- International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, 4715-330 Braga, Portugal; (P.P.); (L.D.)
- RUBYnanomed Lda, 4700-314 Braga, Portugal
| | - Miguel Miranda
- Urology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, ULS Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Ana Cavaco
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.C.); (C.R.); (A.C.); (S.K.); (L.C.)
| | - Sandra Kucharczak
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.C.); (C.R.); (A.C.); (S.K.); (L.C.)
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 8905, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marília Antunes
- CEAUL—Centro de Estatística e Aplicações, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-028 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Sara Peixoto
- Radiology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, ULS Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - José Palma dos Reis
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
- Urology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, ULS Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Tomé Lopes
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Lorena Diéguez
- International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, 4715-330 Braga, Portugal; (P.P.); (L.D.)
- RUBYnanomed Lda, 4700-314 Braga, Portugal
| | - Luís Costa
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.C.); (C.R.); (A.C.); (S.K.); (L.C.)
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
- Oncology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, ULS Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang M, Cao L, Lu T, Xiao C, Wu Z, Jiang X, Wang W, Li H. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Heliyon 2024; 10:e26422. [PMID: 38434013 PMCID: PMC10906293 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Study objective Kidney neoplasms have a high incidence, and radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy are the main treatment options. Our study aims to investigate the use of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy surgery. Design Prospective, randomized, double-blind. Setting University hospital. Patients Our study included 50 patients (ASA I-III) who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy at the hospital of Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University. Interventions The patients were divided into two groups: the ESPB group and the control group. In the ESPB group, a mixture of 10 mL of 1% lidocaine, 10 mL of 0.7% ropivacaine, 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, and 5 mg of dexamethasone was administered. In the control group, 20 mL of 0.9% saline was administered. Measurements The primary outcome measure was the total consumption of sufentanil during the intraoperative period. Secondary outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and during coughing at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively, intraoperative consumption of remifentanil, frequency of rescue analgesic administration, consumption of rescue analgesia and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 48 h. Results The ESPB group exhibited lower intraoperative consumption of sufentanil, lower consumption of rescue analgesia, as well as VAS scores at rest and during coughing within the first 24 h postoperatively, compared to the control group. However, no significant differences were observed in VAS scores at 48 h postoperatively, postoperative nausea and vomiting, or the need for postoperative rescue analgesia. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided ESPB performed in patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy demonstrated a substantial decrease in intraoperative opioid consumption, as well as lower VAS scores at rest and during coughing in the postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Lei Cao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Tong Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Cheng Xiao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Zhuoxi Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Xuetao Jiang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA, Chongqing, 400037, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Okhawere KE, Pandav K, Grauer R, Wilson MP, Saini I, Korn TG, Meilika KN, Badani KK. Trends in the surgical management of kidney cancer by tumor stage, treatment modality, facility type, and location. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2451-2460. [PMID: 37470910 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01664-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Partial nephrectomy (PN) is an alternative to radical nephrectomy (RN) in the appropriate localized renal tumor. The scope of PN has expanded over time and, since the advent and proliferation of minimally invasive surgery, more surgeons have access to and have been trained in laparoscopic and robotic technology. Amid the changing surgical landscape, we sought to characterize the trends in management by cancer stage, institution type, and geographic location using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We queried the NCDB for patients with kidney cancer from 2004 to 2019. Overall, 241,311 patients who underwent PN or RN were included in the study. The nephrectomy approach was categorized as robotic partial (RPN), robotic radical (RRN), laparoscopic partial (LPN), laparoscopic radical (LRN), open or unspecified partial (OPN), and open or unspecified radical (ORN). The categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentages. Overall, there was an increase in the utilization of robotic approaches from 2010 to 2019. For cT1 tumors, the use of RPN and RRN increased from 14.27 to 33.06% and 5.24% to 19.63%, respectively. The use of ORN for cT2 and cT3 tumors declined, with rates dropping from 54.71 to 10.76% and 64.71 to 46.64%, respectively. Conversely, the utilization of RRN rose during this period. However, ORN remained the most common approach for cT3 tumors. The use of RPN increased across different facility types, with the highest utilization observed in academic/research programs. The use of ORN for cT2 and cT3 tumors declined across facility types, although it remained most prevalent in community cancer programs. The use of robot-assisted surgery to treat localized renal cancer increased in the US between 2010 and 2019 across all stages of disease. RPN became the most used approach for cT1 disease, while LRN was preferred for cT2 disease. ORN remained the approach of choice for cT3 disease throughout the study period. Trends in facility type and geographic location largely mirrored the overall trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kennedy E Okhawere
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Krunal Pandav
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ralph Grauer
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Michael P Wilson
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Indu Saini
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Talia G Korn
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Kirolos N Meilika
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ketan K Badani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Impact of Blood Loss on Renal Function and Interaction with Ischemia Duration after Nephron-Sparing Surgery. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:9760-9766. [PMID: 36547181 PMCID: PMC9777389 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29120767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) exposes the kidney to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Blood loss and hypotension are also associated with kidney injury. We aimed to test the hypothesis that, during NSS, both ischemia duration and blood loss significantly affect postoperative renal function and that their effects interact. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing NSS were enrolled. The primary endpoint was renal function expressed as the absolute delta between preoperative and postoperative peak creatinine. We developed a generalized linear model with the ischemia duration and absolute hemoglobin difference as independent variables, their interaction term, and the RENAL score. The model was than expanded to include a history of hypertension (as a proxy for hypotension susceptibility) and related interaction terms. Further, we described the perioperative and mid-term oncological outcomes. RESULTS A total of 478 patients underwent NSS, and 209 (43.7%) required ischemia for a mean of 10.9 min (SD 8). Both the ischemia duration (partial eta 0.842, p = 0.006) and hemoglobin difference (partial eta 0.933, p = 0.029) significantly affected postoperative renal function, albeit without evidence of a significant interaction (p = 0.525). The RENAL score also significantly influenced postoperative renal function (p = 0.023). After the addition of a previous history of hypertension, the effects persisted, with a significant interaction between blood loss and a history of hypertension (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Ischemia duration and blood loss had a similar impact on postoperative renal function, albeit without potentiating each other. While the surgical technique and ischemia minimization remain crucial to postoperative kidney function, increased awareness of conscious hemodynamic management appears warranted.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abou Heidar N, Hakam N, El-Asmar JM, Najdi J, Khauli MA, Degheili J, El-Hajj A, Nasr R, Wazzan W, Bulbul M, Mukherji D, Khauli R. The R.E.N.A.L score’s relevance in determining perioperative and oncological outcomes: a Middle-Eastern tertiary care center experience. Arab J Urol 2022; 20:115-120. [PMID: 35935911 PMCID: PMC9354629 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2022.2064041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the significance of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry scoring system in predicting perioperative and oncological outcomes and determining the surgical approach of choice for kidney tumors. Patients and Methods: Our study retrospectively reviewed outcomes from the year 2002 to 2017. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables and chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable cox proportional hazard regression were performed to determine an association between the different R.E.N.A.L categories and disease recurrence or mortality. Results A total of 325 patients underwent kidney surgery The most common R.E.N.A.L score category in our cohort study was intermediate (41.2%), followed by low, (33.2%) and high (25.5%). Patients with a high R.E.N.A.L score had worse perioperative outcomes compared to those with a low R.E.N.A.L score. High R.E.N.A.L score patients were 3 times more likely to receive blood transfusions compared to those with a low R.E.N.A.L score (19.4% vs 6.3%, p = 0.018), and a statistically significant longer hospital length of stay was also observed between the two groups (median 4.5 vs 4 days, p = 0.0419). In addition, the only predictor of disease recurrence or mortality was a high R.E.N.A.L score (Hazard Ratio (HR) 3.65, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.05–12.7, p = 0.041). Conclusion Our study sheds light on the use of R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score in predicting perioperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes. Such findings may play a role in optimizing surgical approaches and pre-operative patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nassib Abou Heidar
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nizar Hakam
- The Breyer Lab, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
| | - Jose M El-Asmar
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jad Najdi
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Jad Degheili
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Albert El-Hajj
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rami Nasr
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Wassim Wazzan
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Raja Khauli
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomies utilizing a quadratus lumborum block. J Robot Surg 2022; 16:1383-1389. [PMID: 35142979 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01379-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been developed in several fields to reduce hospitalization lengths and overall costs. There have also been developments in multimodal analgesia methods to curtail opioid usage after surgery. Herein, we present the results of our initiation of an ERAS protocol for robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomies, employing a quadratus lumborum (QL) regional anesthetic block. We retrospectively reviewed 614 patients in our Institutional Review Board approved database who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial or radical nephrectomies from January 2017 to February 2020. An ERAS protocol utilizing multimodal analgesia (acetaminophen and gabapentin) and a QL block was developed and introduced in February 2019. We then compared the opioid consumption and perioperative outcomes of patients before and after ERAS protocol initiation. 192 ERAS patients (February 2019 to February 2020) were compared to 422 non-ERAS patients (January 2017 to January 2019). Baseline characteristics and the proportion of preoperative opioids users were similar between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in surgery length, hospitalization length, or complication rates. There were statistically significant differences in our primary endpoint, opioid consumption, on post-operative days 0 (p < 0.001), 1 (p < 0.001), and 2 (p < 0.001). The total opioid requirements over the course of admission were lower in the ERAS group compared to the non-ERAS group (p = 0.03). The initiation of an ERAS protocol employing multimodal analgesia and a QL block, for patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial or radical nephrectomies, can decrease opioid requirements without compromising perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
|
8
|
Qin KR, Perera M, Papa N, Mitchell D, Chuen J. Open versus Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Australian Private Sector Over Twenty Years. J Endovasc Ther 2021; 28:844-851. [PMID: 34212777 DOI: 10.1177/15266028211028215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Over the past two decades, the proliferation of endovascular surgery has changed the approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. In Australia, close to two-thirds of surgical procedures are performed in the private healthcare system. We aimed to describe the trends in AAA repair in the Australian private sector throughout the early 21st century. MATERIALS AND METHODS Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) statistics were accessed to determine the number of infrarenal open AAA repair (OAR) and endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) procedures performed between January 2000 and December 2019. Population data were extracted from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and used to calculate incidence per 100,000 population. Further analysis was performed according to age, gender, and state. RESULTS During the study period, 13,193 (67.0%) EVARs and 6504 (33.0%) OARs were performed in the Australian private sector. OARs fell from 70.5% (n=567) of AAA repairs in 2000 to 15.7% (n=237) in 2019, while EVARs rose from 29.5% (n=151) to 84.3% (n=808). The frequency of EVAR surpassed OAR in 2004. The overall incidence of AAA repair varied minimally over the time period (range: 4.9-6.5 per 100,000 adults per year). AAA repair was more common in males than females (9.7 vs 1.7 per 100,000 population) and more common in older age groups. There was a 4-fold increase in EVAR among males older than 85 years (12.8-57.4 per 100,000 population), the largest rise of any group. The overall EVAR:OAR ratio increased from 0.4 to 5.4. There were considerable state-based discrepancies. CONCLUSION The landscape of AAA repair in Australian private sector has drastically changed with a clear preference toward EVAR. EVAR saw increased use across all genders, age groups and states, despite stable rates of AAA surgery. Further research is necessary to compare our findings to national trends in the Australian public sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirby R Qin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nathan Papa
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Mitchell
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason Chuen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McVey A, Qu LG, Chan G, Perera M, Brennan J, Chung E, Gani J. What a mesh! An Australian experience using national female continence surgery trends over 20 years. World J Urol 2021; 39:3931-3938. [PMID: 33837448 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03691-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the evolution of female continence surgical practice in Australia over the last 20 years and observe whether vaginal mesh controversies impacted these trends. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2000 to December 2019, medicare benefit schedule codes for female continence procedures were identified and extracted for: mesh sling, fascial sling, bulking agent, female urethral prosthesis, colposuspension, and removal of sling. Population-adjusted incidences per 100,000 persons were calculated using publicly available demographic data. Three discrete phases were defined over the study time frame for analysis: 2000-2006; 2006-2017, and 2017-2019. Interrupted time-series analyses were conducted to assess for impact on incidence at 2006 and 2017. RESULTS There were 119,832 continence procedures performed in Australia from 2000 to 2019, with the mid-urethral sling (MUS) the most common (72%). The majority of mesh (n = 63,668, 73%) and fascial sling (n = 1864, 70%) procedures were in women aged < 65 years. Rates of mesh-related procedures steeply declined after 2017 (initial change: -21 cases per 100,000; subsequent rate change: -12 per 100,000, p < 0.001). Non-mesh related/bulking agents increased from + 0.34 during 2006-2017 to + 2.1 per 100,000 after 2017 (p < 0.001). No significant change in mesh extraction was observed over 2006-2017 (+ 0.06 per 100,000, p = 0.192). There was a significant increase in mesh extraction procedures after 2017 (0.83 per 100,000, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Worldwide, controversy surrounding vaginal mesh had a significant impact on Australian continence surgery trends. The most standout trends were observed after the 2017 Australian class-action lawsuit and Senate Inquiry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoife McVey
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Liang G Qu
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Garson Chan
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Janelle Brennan
- Department of Urology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC, Australia
| | - Eric Chung
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Johan Gani
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Farinha R, Rosiello G, Paludo ADO, Mazzone E, Puliatti S, Amato M, De Groote R, Piazza P, Berquin C, Montorsi F, Schatteman P, De Naeyer G, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A. Selective Suturing or Sutureless Technique in Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Results from a Propensity-score Matched Analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:506-513. [PMID: 33775611 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite efforts aimed at preserving renal function, the functional decline after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is not negligible. To address the risk of intraparenchymal vessel injuries during renorrhaphy, with consequent loss of functional renal parenchyma, we introduced a new surgical technique for RAPN. OBJECTIVE To compare perioperative patient outcomes between selective-suturing or sutureless RAPN (suRAPN) and standard RAPN (stRAPN). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Ninety-two consecutive patients undergoing RAPN for a renal mass performed by a high-volume surgeon at a European tertiary center were included. Propensity-score matching was used to account for baseline differences between suRAPN and stRAPN patients. INTERVENTION RAPN using a selective-suturing or sutureless technique versus standard RAPN. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Perioperative outcomes included operative time, blood loss, length of stay, and intraoperative and 30-d postoperative complications. We also evaluated trifecta achievement (warm ischemia time ≤25 min, negative surgical margins, and no perioperative complications) and the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). We applied χ2 tests, t tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests to assess differences in perioperative outcomes between suRAPN and stRAPN. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 29 patients (31%) were treated with suRAPN. Only one suRAPN patient experienced intraoperative complications (p = 0.9). Two suRAPN patients (6.9%) and four stRAPN patients (13.8%) experienced 30-d postoperative complications (p = 0.3). Operative time (110 vs 150 min; p < 0.01) and length of stay (2 vs 3 d; p = 0.02) were shorter for suRAPN than for stRAPN. The trifecta outcome was achieved in 25 suRAPN patients (86%) and 20 stRAPN patients (70%; p = 0.1). Only one suRAPN patient (3.4%) versus five stRAPN patients (17%) experienced postoperative AKI (p = 0.2). Finally, the decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 6-mo follow-up was lower in the suRAPN (-5.2%) than in the stRAPN group (-9.1%; p < 0.01). Lack of randomization represents the main study limitation. CONCLUSIONS A selective-suturing or sutureless technique in RAPN is feasible and safe. Moreover, suRAPN is a lower-impact surgical procedure. We obtained promising results for trifecta and functional outcomes, but prospective randomized trials are needed to validate the impact of selective suturing or a sutureless technique on long-term functional outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY We assessed a new technique in robotic surgery to remove part of the kidney because of kidney cancer. Our new technique involves selective suturing or no suturing of the area from where the tumor is removed. We found that the rate of complications did not increase and the operating time and length of hospital stay were shorter using this new technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Farinha
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Artur De Oliveira Paludo
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, Clinic Hospital of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Amato
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Camille Berquin
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter Schatteman
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Geert De Naeyer
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Frederiek D'Hondt
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen MY, Woodruff MA, Kua B, Rukin NJ. Rapid Segmentation of Renal Tumours to Calculate Volume Using 3D Interpolation. J Digit Imaging 2021; 34:351-356. [PMID: 33564999 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00416-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Small renal masses are commonly diagnosed with modern medical imaging. Renal tumour volume has been explored as a prognostic tool to help decide when intervention is needed and appears to provide additional prognostic information for smaller tumours compared with tumour diameter. However, the current method of calculating tumour volume in clinical practice uses the ellipsoid equation (π/6 × length × width × height) which is an oversimplified approach. Some research groups trace the contour of the tumour in every image slice which is impractical for clinical use. In this study, we demonstrate a method of using 3D segmentation software and the 3D interpolation method to rapidly calculate renal tumour volume in under a minute. Using this method in 27 patients that underwent radical or partial nephrectomy, we found a 10.07% mean absolute difference compared with the traditional ellipsoid method. Our segmentation volume was closer to the calculated histopathological tumour volume than the traditional method (p = 0.03) with higher Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (0.79 vs 0.72). 3D segmentation has many uses related to 3D printing and modelling and is becoming increasingly common. Calculation of tumour volume is one additional benefit it provides. Further studies on the association between segmented tumour volume and prognosis are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Y Chen
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, QLD, Australia. .,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. .,Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Maria A Woodruff
- Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Boon Kua
- Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicholas J Rukin
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, QLD, Australia.,Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Porpiglia F, Mari A, Amparore D, Fiori C, Antonelli A, Artibani W, Bove P, Brunocilla E, Capitanio U, Da Pozzo L, Di Maida F, Gontero P, Longo N, Marra G, Rocco B, Schiavina R, Simeone C, Siracusano S, Tellini R, Terrone C, Villari D, Ficarra V, Carini M, Minervini A. Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes and functional follow-up in a large multi-institutional cohort (The RECORD 2 Project). Surg Endosc 2020; 35:4295-4304. [PMID: 32856156 PMCID: PMC8263535 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07919-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aim of this study was to evaluate and compare perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (TR) approaches in a multi-institutional cohort of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MI-PN). MATERIAL AND METHODS All consecutive patients undergone MI-PN for clinical T1 renal tumors at 26 Italian centers (RECORd2 project) between 01/2013 and 12/2016 were evaluated, collecting the pre-, intra-, and postoperative data. The patients were then stratified according to the surgical approach, TP or RP. A 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching was performed to obtain homogeneous cohorts, considering the age, gender, baseline eGFR, surgical indication, clinical diameter, and PADUA score. RESULTS 1669 patients treated with MI-PN were included in the study, 1256 and 413 undergoing TP and RP, respectively. After 1:1 PS matching according to the surgical access, 413 patients were selected from TP group to be compared with the 413 RP patients. Concerning intraoperative variables, no differences were found between the two groups in terms of surgical approach (lap/robot), extirpative technique (enucleation vs standard PN), hilar clamping, and ischemia time. Conversely, the TP group recorded a shorter median operative time in comparison with the RP group (115 vs 150 min), with a higher occurrence of intraoperative overall, 21 (5.0%) vs 9 (2.1%); p = 0.03, and surgical complications, 18 (4.3%) vs 7 (1.7%); p = 0.04. Concerning postoperative variables, the two groups resulted comparable in terms of complications, positive surgical margins and renal function, even if the RP group recorded a shorter median drainage duration and hospital length of stay (3 vs 2 for both variables), p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that both TP and RP are feasible approaches when performing MI-PN, irrespectively from tumor location or surgical complexity. Notwithstanding longer operative times, RP seems to have a slighter intraoperative complication rate with earlier postoperative recovery when compared with TP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology- School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology- School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology- School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (A.O.U.I.), Verona, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bove
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI-Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Da Pozzo
- Department of Urology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology- School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Urology, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Bernardo Rocco
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda' Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico' Policlinico' University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Simeone
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (A.O.U.I.), Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Tellini
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology- School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Donata Villari
- Department of Urology, Unit of Urological Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ficarra
- Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology, Gaetano Barresi, Urologic Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Marco Carini
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology- School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology- School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy. .,Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Forbes MK, Owens EP, Wood ST, Gobe GC, Ellis RJ. Variability in surgical management of kidney cancer between urban and rural hospitals in Queensland, Australia: a population-based analysis. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1210-1221. [PMID: 32676404 PMCID: PMC7354325 DOI: 10.21037/tau-19-775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background International guidelines recommend partial over radical nephrectomy for management of kidney tumours, due to perceived advantages of kidney function preservation. In Queensland, oncological nephrectomy is performed in both metropolitan and rural hospitals. Previous studies have shown that patients from rural areas with kidney tumours are less likely to undergo partial nephrectomy compared with those in major cities. The aim of this study was to investigate patterns of partial nephrectomy according to geographical area, and to identify patient- and health-service-level characteristics associated with partial nephrectomy. Methods All 3,799 incident kidney cancer cases in Queensland (Jan 2009 to Dec 2014) were ascertained. Patients aged <18 yrs (n=47), who did not receive surgery (n=988), or had end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) before surgery (n=17) were excluded. The final sample included 2,747 patients. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regression in order to identify associations with partial nephrectomy. Results Of 2,747 patients, 637 (25%) underwent partial nephrectomy. The likelihood of undergoing partial nephrectomy increased with more recent year of surgery (P<0.001) and higher socioeconomic status (P<0.001). The likelihood of undergoing partial nephrectomy decreased for patients managed in lower-volume centres (P=0.004), with increasing age (P<0.001), and hospital location outside of a major city (P<0.001). Overall, the number of nephrectomies, and proportion/number of partial nephrectomies, performed in rural hospitals has increased over the study period. Conclusions Our results suggest that, although patients who are managed in major cities are more likely to undergo partial nephrectomy, likelihood of undergoing partial nephrectomy in rural centres is increasing, consistent with international best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan K Forbes
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Evan P Owens
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.,NHMRC Chronic Kidney Disease Centre for Research Excellence, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Simon T Wood
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.,Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Glenda C Gobe
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.,NHMRC Chronic Kidney Disease Centre for Research Excellence, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Robert J Ellis
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.,Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cundy TP, Barker A, Borzi P, Khurana S. Variation in ureteric re-implantation for Australian children. ANZ J Surg 2020; 91:1011-1016. [PMID: 32419287 DOI: 10.1111/ans.15995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management options for vesicoureteric reflux are numerous, increasingly diversifying and debated. There is longstanding anecdotal opinion of inexplicable regional variation in vesicoureteric reflux management in Australia. This study investigates temporal trends in ureteric re-implantation for children, and variation between states and territories. METHODS Ureteric re-implantation data for children aged 0-14 years were retrieved from the Medicare Benefits Scheme item reports database for the 20-year period from 1998-2017. Claims data were population adjusted for each state then standardized for age using Australian Bureau of Statistics records. National and regional trends were calculated using joinpoint regression. Comparison between eastern (New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory) and western or central (Western Australia, South Australia) states was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS There were 4919 procedure rebate claims during the study period. A national decrease in claim rates of 6.3% per 100 000 children was identified (P < 0.001). This was derived from significant decreases observed in eastern states. There was a threefold higher claim rate in Western Australia and South Australia per annum compared to the remainder of the country (4.0 versus 12.6 per 100 000; P < 0.001). For the most recent 5 years of the study period, this difference increased to a sevenfold higher rate (1.6 versus 11.1; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION There has been a dramatic nationwide decline in the rate of ureteric re-implantation procedure claims. Regional disparity between each side of the country is widening. Further research is required to determine if this degree of variation is warranted or unwarranted. The observed regional variation facilitates opportunity for a nationwide pragmatic clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P Cundy
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Andrew Barker
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Borzi
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sanjeev Khurana
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim LHC, Patel MI. Increased utilization of partial nephrectomy in the robotic surgery era. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90:9-10. [PMID: 32067306 DOI: 10.1111/ans.15644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence H C Kim
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Manish I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|