A score-based method for quality control of fetal hard palate assessment during routine second-trimester ultrasound examination

Diagnostic significance of combined two-dimensional ultrasound and three-dimensional tomographic ultrasound imaging for cleft palate in fetus of 11-13 + 6 weeks: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Clinical screening for cleft palate in fetus currently focuses on weeks 20-24. It has been shown that cleft palate can be detected by ultrasound in first-trimester anatomy scan, but there are no large-scale samples to validate. This study was to confirm the ability of combined two-dimensional(2D)-ultrasound and three-dimensional(3D)-tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) to safely detect an fetal cleft palate at 11-13 + 6 weeks via large-scale samples.

METHODS

A prospective study was designed, involving 6870 pregnant women applying 2D-ultrasound transabdominal sweeps of the fetal face in the median sagittal and coronal views of the retronasal triangle with abnormalities of the palatal line detected, followed by an axial view of the superior alveolar eminence and 3D-TUI evaluation. The endpoints were the results of the fetal facial profile assessment for delivery and induction of labor. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound for diagnosing a cleft palate at 11-13 + 6 weeks were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 6870 fetus, a total of 43 different cleft palate types were diagnosed by 2D-ultrasound in three-sections at the 11-13 + 6 weeks, and a total of 6827 cases were diagnosed of negative for cleft palate. Of the 43 cases diagnosed of positive for cleft palate, three cases were false positives compared to endpoint results, with a correct positive predictive value of 93.0%. Of the 6827 cases diagnosed of negative for cleft palate, five cases were false negatives compared to endpoint results, with a correct negative predictive value of 99.0%. The sensitivity and specificity of 2D-ultrasound screening for cleft palate were 84.4%, and 99.9%, respectively. The 43 cases received 3D-TUI scans, and the results showed that 37 cases of cleft palate detected, with a positive predictive value of 86.0%, which was lower than that of 2D ultrasonography (93.0%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

It may be feasible and accurate to diagnose cleft palate in fetus at 11-13 + 6 weeks by using combined 2D three sections ultrasound and 3D-TUI scans.

Diagnosis of fetal isolated cleft palate using assessment of the posterior hard palate angle

Objective

The study aims to evaluate the role of the posterior hard palate angle in the prenatal diagnosis of cleft palate.

Study Design

Stored images of the axial transverse view of the fetal secondary palate, obtained at three-level obstetric ultrasounds, were used to evaluate the posterior border of the hard palate. The study population comprised 63 consecutive pregnancies of unaffected cases and 17 pregnancies suspected for a cleft palate without cleft lip, including 7 cases of cleft palate, 4 cases of high-arched palate, and 6 false-positive cases.

Results

The posterior angle of the hard palate was significantly larger in the cleft palate group than in the healthy controls and false-positive cases: 227° (±51°) vs 160° (±16°), p < 0.0001; and 173° ± 18°, p < 0.0001, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that reflex angle remained an independent risk factor for cleft palate (odds ratio, 58.67 (95% confidence interval 10-341)). The sensitivity and specificity of the posterior angle assessment were 73% and 96%, respectively.

Conclusions

The posterior hard palate angle could be an ultrasound marker of cleft palate without a cleft lip.

Alveolar Cleft Size on Prenatal Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Predicts Cleft of the Secondary Palate in Unilateral Cleft Lip

SUMMARY

Prenatal diagnosis of cleft palate (CP) is challenging. The current study's objective was to investigate whether prenatal alveolar cleft width is associated with the likelihood of a cleft of the secondary palate in unilateral cleft lip (CL). The authors reviewed two-dimensional ultrasound (US) images in fetuses with unilateral CL from January of 2012 to February of 2016. Images of the fetal face were obtained with a linear and/or curved probe in the axial and coronal planes. Measurements of the alveolar ridge gap were taken by the senior radiologist. Postnatal phenotype findings were compared with prenatal findings. Thirty patients with unilateral CL met inclusion criteria; average gestational age was 26.67 ± 5.11 weeks (range, 20.71 to 36.57 weeks). Ten fetuses were found to have an intact alveolar ridge by prenatal US; postnatal examination confirmed intact secondary palate in all. Small alveolar defects (<4 mm) were noted in three fetuses; postnatal examination documented CP in a single patient. CP was confirmed in 15 of the remaining 17 fetuses who had alveolar cleft width greater than 4 mm. An alveolar defect of greater than or equal to 4 mm on prenatal US was associated with greater likelihood of a cleft of the secondary palate [c 2 (2, n = 30) = 20.23; P < 0.001]. In the setting of unilateral CL, prenatal US documentation of alveolar defects greater than or equal to 4 mm are highly predictive of the presence of a cleft of the secondary palate. Conversely, an intact alveolar ridge is associated with an intact secondary palate.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, II.

Overview of Ultrasound in Dentistry for Advancing Research Methodology and Patient Care Quality with Emphasis on Periodontal/Peri-implant Applications

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is a non-invasive, cross-sectional imaging technique emerging in dentistry. It is an adjunct tool for diagnosing pathologies in the oral cavity that overcomes some limitations of current methodologies, including direct clinical examination, 2D radiographs, and cone beam computerized tomography. Increasing demand for soft tissue imaging has led to continuous improvements on transducer miniaturization and spatial resolution. The aims of this study are (1) to create a comprehensive overview of the current literature of ultrasonic imaging relating to dentistry, and (2) to provide a view onto investigations with immediate, intermediate, and long-term impact in periodontology and implantology.

METHODS

A rapid literature review was performed using two broad searches conducted in the PubMed database, yielding 576 and 757 citations, respectively. A rating was established within a citation software (EndNote) using a 5-star classification. The broad search with 757 citations allowed for high sensitivity whereas the subsequent rating added specificity.

RESULTS

A critical review of the clinical applications of ultrasound in dentistry was provided with a focus on applications in periodontology and implantology. The role of ultrasound as a developing dental diagnostic tool was reviewed. Specific uses such as soft and hard tissue imaging, longitudinal monitoring, as well as anatomic and physiological evaluation were discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Future efforts should be directed towards the transition of ultrasonography from a research tool to a clinical tool. Moreover, a dedicated effort is needed to introduce ultrasonic imaging to dental education and the dental community to ultimately improve the quality of patient care.

Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis

Precision of cleft lip and/or palate antenatal diagnosis plays a significant role in counselling, neonatal care, surgical strategies and psychological support of the family. This study aims to measure the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis in our institution and the detection rate of cleft lip and/or palate on routine morphologic ultrasonography. In this retrospective observational study, we compared antenatal and postnatal diagnosis of 233 patients followed in our unit. We classified our patients according to the Kernahan and Stark's classification system: Group 1: facial cleft including labial and labio-maxillary clefts; Group 2: facial cleft including total, subtotal and submucous palatal clefts; Group 3: labio-maxillary-palatal clefts. Out of 233 patients, 104 were antenatally diagnosed with a facial cleft, i.e., an overall detection rate of 44.6%. The diagnosis was confirmed at birth in 65 of these patients, i.e., an overall accuracy of 62.5%. Of the 67 children (29.2%) in Group 1, the screening detection rate was 58.2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 48.7%. Of the 97 children (41.6%) in Group 2, the screening detection rate was 2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 50%. Of the 69 children (29.6%) in Group 3, the screening detection rate was 91.3% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 71.4%. Our study demonstrates a relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in prenatal ultrasound, where the diagnosis was inaccurate in one third to one half of patients. It showed great variability in the screening detection rate depending on the diagnostic group observed, as well as a low rate of detection of palatal clefts.

Cleft palate in fetuses: feasibility of early diagnosis by Crystal and Realistic Vue rendering 3D ultrasound technology in the first trimester

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of direct visualization of a normal fetal palate and detect cleft palate in the first trimester with a novel three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) technique, Crystal and Realistic Vue (CRV) rendering technology.

Methods

Two-dimensional (2D) images and 3D volumes of healthy and cleft palate fetuses at 11-13⁺⁶ weeks were obtained prospectively. 2D ultrasound views included the coronal view of the retronasal triangle and the midsagittal view of the face. 3D-CRV views were analyzed by multiplanar mode display. The pregnancy outcomes of all fetuses were determined during the follow-up period.

Results

In our study, 124 fetuses were recruited, including 100 healthy fetuses and 24 cleft palate fetuses. The cleft palate with lip was observed in 23 fetuses (bilateral in 15, unilateral in 6, median in 2), and one cleft palate was only found in the abnormal group. The bilateral (n = 12) and median (n = 2) cleft palates with lips and the cleft palate alone (n = 1) were associated with other anatomical or chromosomal abnormalities, and one unilateral cleft palate with cleft lip had concomitant NT thickening. In the cleft palate fetus group, 16 fetuses suffered intrauterine death, which was associated with other structural or chromosomal abnormalities in 14 fetuses, seven cases were terminated after consultation, and one was delivered at term. The coronal view of the retronasal triangle and the midsagittal view was easily obtained in all fetuses. 3D-CRV images of palatal parts were clearly obtained in all cases. Unilateral, bilateral, and median cleft palates with cleft lips were visually demonstrated and classified by the 3D-CRV technique.

Conclusion

It is feasible to identify the palate by 3D-CRV in the first trimester in both healthy and cleft palate fetuses. Together with 2D ultrasonography as a complementary diagnostic tool, 3D-CRV is helpful in classifying the cleft palate with a reasonable degree of certainty.

Understanding the distinction between cleft lip and cleft palate: a critical step for successful prenatal detection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Orofacial clefts (OCs) are among the most common congenital anomalies, however, prenatal detection of cleft palate without cleft lip (CP) remains low. CP is associated with a higher risk of associated structural anomalies, recurrence risk and genetic aberrations. There is opportunity to optimize prenatal diagnosis, counseling and diagnostic genetic testing for OCs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improving prenatal diagnosis of CP requires understanding that embryologically, the secondary palate develops from the 6th to the 10th week and fuses with the primary palate by the 12th week. Multiple first, second and third trimester 2D ultrasonographic markers for OCs have been described including the maxillary gap, frontal space, maxilla-nasion-mandible angle, retronasal triangle, palatino-maxillary diameter, equal sign, nonvisualization or gap in the soft to hard palate interface and loss of the superimposed line. We discuss the technique, evidence and limitations of each.

SUMMARY

Prenatal detection of OC can be optimized by employing 2D sonographic markers. Prenatal detection of CP may be improved by recognizing its high association with retrognathia/micrognathia.

Comparison of prenatal ultrasound with MRI in the evaluation and prediction of fetal orofacial clefts

BACKGROUND

Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are common craniofacial abnormalities. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic and predictive values of prenatal ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

We reviewed the newborn physical examinations or fetal autopsy data with OFCs. Between January 2013 and December 2018, the diagnoses resulting from prenatal US and MRI examination were compared retrospectively with the postpartum diagnoses. The diagnostic prediction of prenatal imaging was then determined.

RESULTS

334 infants were identified with OFCs by either newborn physical exam or stillborn autopsy. For detection of OFCs by US, the total accuracy (ACC), true positive rate (TPR), true negative rate (TNR), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 99.9% (111,178/110,286), 81.9% (230/281), 99.9% (109,948/110,005), 80.1% (230/287), and 99.9% (109,948/109,999), respectively. For MRI, the ACC, TPR, TNR, PPV, and NPV were 99.8% (4,125/4,132), 89.8% (44/49), 99.9% (4,081/4,083), 95.7% (44/46), and 99.9% (4,081/4,086), respectively. When we compared the predictive values between prenatal US and MRI, there were significant differences in the PPV of OFCs (P < 0.05), NPV of OFCs (P < 0.05), TPR of CLO (P < 0.001), PPV of CLP (P < 0.05), and TPR of CPO (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that prenatal US could be effective for diagnosing and ruling out fetal OFCs. Diagnostic confidence is significantly improved when fetal MRI is used to assess fetal OFCs as an adjunct to US examination.

[Ultrasound scan of a fetus with facial cleft must be done from the lip to the uvula: What's new?]

Facial cleft are the most frequent craniofacial anomalies with an incidence of one for 1000 births, all births combined, and require specialized multidisciplinary care. Since 2005, the systematic realization of two ultrasound views (nose-lip and profile) is recommended for the exploration of the fetal face in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy. Application of these recommendations should allow screening of the majority of cleft lip and palate. However, cleft palates, without labiomaxillary involvement, are currently largely underdiagnosed at prenatal ultrasound, although they can be associated with a syndromic diagnosis in up to 30% of cases. The aim of this work is to describe, from embryology to surgical consultation, the complete ultrasound examination of a fetus with a classic facial cleft.

Absent 'superimposed-line' sign: novel marker in early diagnosis of cleft of fetal secondary palate

OBJECTIVES

To describe a novel sign, the 'superimposed-line' sign, for early diagnosis of cleft of the fetal secondary palate on two-dimensional imaging of the vomeromaxillary junction in the midsagittal view.

METHODS

This was a prospective evaluation of the superimposed-line sign using two-dimensional sonography (midsagittal view) in 9576 singleton fetuses referred for routine screening between 12 and 20 weeks of gestation. In this view, the vomer bone appears as a line superimposed on the distal two-thirds of the maxillary line, as the vomer fuses with the secondary palate in the midline. If there is a midline cleft of the secondary palate, the line formed by the palate is absent and hence only the vomer bone is visualized, creating a single line instead of the normal superimposed double line. Multiplanar three-dimensional (3D) views were assessed in cases in which the superimposed-line sign was absent.

RESULTS

The superimposed line was absent in 17 fetuses with a cleft of the secondary palate that was confirmed by 3D evaluation. Of these, 13 had defects involving the premaxilla and four had an isolated cleft of the secondary palate. Postnatal confirmation was available in all cases. The sign was useful in ruling out cleft of the fetal secondary palate in 32 high-risk cases with a family history of cleft palate. The superimposed-line sign had a sensitivity of 89.5% in detecting cleft of the secondary palate.

CONCLUSIONS

The superimposed-line sign is a new sonographic marker for evaluation of cleft of the fetal secondary palate; documentation of this sign proves the presence of both the palate and vomer in the midline. This marker can be demonstrated clearly in the late first trimester, allowing early diagnosis of secondary palatine cleft. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of cleft palate without cleft lip, the new ultrasound semiology

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to define the prenatal ultrasound semiology of cleft palate without cleft lip using 3D visualization of the fetal palate.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal study was performed in our University Hospital Center from 2011 to 2018. The fetal secondary palate was studied in 3D, starting with 2D axial transverse ultrasound view. We defined a cleft palate as a disruption of the horizontal plate of the palatine bone of the secondary palate. Prenatal findings were correlated to anatomic postnatal examinations performed by a paediatric plastic surgeon.

RESULTS

Forty-three cases of cleft palate without cleft lip were prenatally diagnosed, of whom 34 were associated with malformations. We defined four types of disruptive appearances: isolated nonvisualization of the posterior nasal spine; partial-disruption or cleft velum; complete disappearance or V-shaped cleft palate; and complete disappearance or U-shaped cleft palate. The adjusted kappa coefficient, between prenatal and postnatal evaluation, was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79-0.97), corresponding to an excellent agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a strictly axial transverse ultrasound view, visualization of the secondary fetal palate enables to diagnose a cleft palate without cleft lip. This method offers a prenatal anatomic classification of cleft palate with a high level of concordance to postnatal findings.

Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis

This systematic review aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI for detecting cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Pubmed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched systematically. A diagnostic study was included if it performed MRI (index test) and postnatal examination (reference test) in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model, calculating the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. The search resulted in eight studies (334 fetuses) to be included: four prospective and four retrospective studies. The applicability concern was low. There was, however, a risk of selection and information bias. All studies showed that MRI well predicted the chance of cleft palate. The sensitivity results were homogeneous, but heterogeneity was assumed regarding the specificity estimate (Cochrane's Q test: p = 0.00). The pooled sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.93-0.99); the pooled specificity was 0.94 (0.89-0.97). The area under the curve was 0.98 (95% CI 0.98-0.99).Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that MRI has an excellent sensitivity and good to excellent specificity for diagnosing cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Future research should assess applicability for clinical care.What is Known:• Using ultrasound for prenatal detection of cleft palate leads to misdiagnosis frequently.• MRI could potentially improve the prenatal detection rate of cleft palate.What is New:• Eight studies describe the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting cleft palate.• Combined results show excellent sensitivity and good to excellent specificity.

The prenatal diagnosis and classification of cleft palate: the role and value of magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of MRI in the prenatal diagnosis and classification of cleft palate (CP).

METHODS

We collected 94 fetal cases that were suspected of cleft palate with or without cleft lip by prenatal ultrasound (US) and then carried out further MRI to examine the entire body of each fetus within 1 week. The diagnoses resulting from MRI and US examination were compared separately with the final diagnoses obtained from postnatal physical examination or fetal autopsy. The diagnostic accuracy between MRI and US was then determined.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, the results for 6 fetuses (6.38%) were lost. Of the remaining 88 cases, the final diagnoses identified 23 cases of cleft lip (CL), 45 cases of unilateral cleft lip with cleft palate (UCLP), 4 cases of median cleft lip with cleft palate (MCLP), 12 cases of bilateral cleft lip with cleft palate (BCLP), 3 cases of unilateral cleft lip and cleft alveolus (CLA), and 1 case of isolated cleft palate (CPO). The total accuracy rate of US was 59.09%, while that of MRI was 92.05%. More importantly, 81 cases were accurately identified by MRI; the accuracy rate for CL, UCLP, MCLP, BCLP, CLA, and CPO was 86.96%, 95.56%, 100%, 91.67%, 66.67%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that MRI could be a useful adjunct to US examination in the prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with cleft palate, and further demonstrates the classification and degree of involvement of the cleft palate.

KEY POINTS

• MRI is a useful adjunct to prenatal ultrasound. • MRI has a higher accuracy rate for CP. • The accurate classification of CP diagnosed by MRI can guide clinical management.

Blinded Visual Scoring of Images Using the Freely-available Software Blinder

In nearly all subfields of biomedical sciences, there are phenotypes that are currently classified by expert visual scoring. In research applications, these classifications require the experimenter to be blinded to the treatment group in order to avoid unintentional bias in scoring. Currently, many labs either use laborious and tedious methods to manually blind the images, require multiple experimenters to gather and score the data blindly or fail to properly blind the data altogether. In this protocol, we present a simple, freely available software that we created that allows the experimenter to blindly score images. In our protocol, the user loads unblinded images and defines a scoring system. The software then shows the user the images in a random order, allowing the user to select a score from their defined scoring system for each image. Furthermore, the software has an optional "quality control" mechanism where the user will be shown some images multiple times to test the robustness of the visual scoring. Finally, the software summarizes the results in an exportable file that includes unblinded summary data for each group and a full list of images with their scores. In this protocol, we briefly present directions for using the software, potential applications, and caveats/limitations to this approach.