Clinical spectrum of vitreoretinal lymphoma and its association with MyD88 L265P mutation

Posterior Uveitis in Ocular-Involving Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and the Utility of Negative MYD88 L265P Testing in the Diagnosis

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate if a negative test result for MYD88 L265P mutation, associated with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) and primary CNS lymphoma, in liquid biopsies from intraocular fluids can be a useful adjuvant test to diagnose chronic lymphocytic leukemia in clinically challenging cases.

Case Presentations

We selected patients with a past medical history or examinations findings suspicious for intraocular lymphoma. We evaluated both vitreous and aqueous humor-derived (AHD) MYD88 L265P mutation from patients that had suspected intraocular lymphoma that warranted a liquid biopsy procedure. Gold-standard cytopathology, flow cytometry, and gene rearrangement studies were also performed. All 4 patients had negative AHD MYD88 L265P mutation testing. Gold-standard testing (cytology) either showed paucicellular specimens (1/4) or specimens with high background inflammation (3/4). One case showed a rare B-cell clonal population (CD5+, Kappa-restricted by flow cytometry), but this was not sufficient to make any definitive diagnosis. All patients were subsequently initiated on systemic therapy and had improvement in their disease burden.

Conclusions

Negative AHD MYD88 L265P mutation testing can serve as an adjuvant molecular test to diagnose difficult cases of intraocular CLL.

Diagnostic methods for primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: A systematic review

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma is a potentially aggressive intraocular malignancy with poor systemic prognosis and sometimes significant diagnostic delays as it may masquerade as chronic uveitis. Despite the variety of diagnostic techniques, it is unclear which modality is most accurate in the diagnosis of PVRL. A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials for studies published between January, 2000, and June, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on the following diagnostic tools used to diagnose patients with PVRL were included: cytology, flow cytometry, MYD88 L265P mutation, CD79B mutation, interleukin 10/interleukin-6 (IL-10/IL-6) ratio, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for monoclonal immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) and immunoglobulin kappa light chain (IgK) rearrangements, and imaging findings. The aggregated sensitivity of each diagnostic modality was reported and compared using the chi-squared (χ2) test. A total of 662 eyes from 29 retrospective studies reporting on patients diagnosed with PVRL were included. An IL-10/IL-6 ratio greater than 1 had the highest sensitivity (89.39%, n = 278/311 eyes, n = 16 studies) for PVRL, where the sensitivity was not significantly different when only vitreous samples were drawn (88.89%, n = 232/261 eyes, n = 13 studies) compared to aqueous samples (83.33%, n = 20/24, n = 2) (p = 0.42). Flow cytometry of vitreous samples gave a positive result in 66/75 eyes (88.00%, n = 6 studies) with PVRL, and monoclonal IgH rearrangements on PCR gave a positive result in 354/416 eyes (85.10%, n = 20 studies) with PVRL. MYD88 L265P and CD79B mutation analysis performed poorly, yielding a positive result in 63/90 eyes (70.00%, n = 8 studies) with PVRL, and 20/57 eyes (35.09%, n = 4 studies) with PVRL, respectively. Overall, our systematic review found that an IL-10/IL-6 ratio greater or equal to one may provide the highest sensitivity in identifying patients with PVRL. Future studies are needed to employ multiple diagnostic tools to aid in the detection of PVRL and to further establish nuanced guidelines when determining the optimal diagnostic tool to use in diverse patient populations.

Aqueous Humor-Derived MYD88 L265P Mutation Analysis in Vitreoretinal Lymphoma: A Potential Less Invasive Method for Diagnosis and Treatment Response Assessment

PURPOSE

To investigate whether MYD88 L265P mutation, which is frequently present in vitreoretinal lymphoma, can be detected in aqueous humor, a specimen that can be obtained in a clinic setting, potentially mitigating the need for more invasive vitrectomy procedures, and whether this approach can be used to monitor treatment response.

DESIGN

Observational case series.

SUBJECTS

Patients who were diagnosed with biopsy-confirmed or clinically diagnosed vitreoretinal lymphoma or biopsy-confirmed vitritis.

METHODS

We evaluated aqueous humor-derived (AHD) MYD88 L265P mutation during vitreous biopsy or at the initial presentation in the clinic if vitreous biopsy was not feasible. Demographic or clinical features of patients were retrospectively reviewed. Aqueous humor-derived MYD88 L265P mutation was re-evaluated after patients completed a course of intravitreal methotrexate and rituximab injection therapy. The NM_002468.4: c.794T>C (p.L265P) mutation in the MYD88 gene was evaluated in AHD cellular and cell-free DNA using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Detection of AHD MYD88 L265P mutation at the initial diagnosis and to monitor the treatment response.

RESULTS

Aqueous humor from 18 eyes of 14 patients with biopsy-confirmed or clinically diagnosed vitreoretinal lymphoma and 3 eyes of 3 patients with biopsy-confirmed vitritis were evaluated. Aqueous humor-derived MYD88 L265P mutation was detected in cell-based and cell-free DNA from 15 (83%) of 18 eyes with biopsy-confirmed or clinically diagnosed vitreoretinal lymphoma but not identified in any of the 3 eyes with vitritis. The mutation was less readily detectable in cellular DNA (10 of 18) compared with cell-free DNA (15 of 18). Furthermore, aqueous sampling after intravitreal methotrexate and rituximab injection therapy revealed absence of this mutation after complete response in 7 eyes. The mutation was detected in 1 eye that developed recurrence in a posttreatment window of 6 months. After a mean of follow-up of 9 months, there was no clinical evidence of vitreoretinal lymphoma recurrence in the 7 eyes with no detectable AHD MYD88 L265P mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigational study suggests that AHD MYD88 L265P can be detected in eyes with lymphoma and may thus serve as a surrogate, less invasive biopsy in the diagnosis and follow-up of vitreoretinal lymphoma, particularly when cell-free DNA is evaluated.

Update in Molecular Testing for Intraocular Lymphoma

Simple Summary

The diagnosis of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma and central nervous system lymphoma is challenging. Intraocular biopsy and molecular testing are important for the diagnosis of cases with intraocular involvement. Intraocular biopsy does not always result in a tissue diagnosis. There are many new molecular tests that are currently being used to improve the yield of intraocular biopsy. This article will review the available molecular tests for intraocular lymphoma.

Abstract

The diagnosis of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma and central nervous system lymphoma is challenging. In cases with intraocular involvement, vitreous biopsy plays a pivotal role. Several diagnostic tests are employed to confirm a diagnosis and include cytologic evaluation, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and cytokine analysis. The limitations of these conventional diagnostic tests stem from the often paucicellular nature of vitreous biopsy specimens and the fragility of malignant cells ex vivo. Several emerging molecular techniques show promise in improving the diagnostic yield of intraocular biopsy, possibly enabling more accurate and timely diagnoses. This article will review existing diagnostic modalities for intraocular lymphoma, with an emphasis on currently available molecular tests.

Circulating cell-free DNA and IL-10 from cerebrospinal fluids aid primary vitreoretinal lymphoma diagnosis

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a rare variant of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) that presents diagnostic challenges. Here, we focused on circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) isolated from cerebrospinal fluid. Twenty-three VRL patients (17 PVRL, 2 PCNSL/O, and 4 relapsed VRL, from 10/2018 to 12/2021) and 8 uveitis patients were included in this study. CSF samples from 19 vitreoretinal lymphoma patients had sufficient cfDNA for next-generation sequencing. Of these patients, 73.7% (14/19) had at least one meaningful non-Hodgkin lymphoma-related mutation. The characteristic MYD88 ^L265P mutation was detected in the CSF of 12 VRL patients, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 63.2%, 100%, 100%, and 46.2%, respectively. No meaningful lymphoma related mutations were found in CSF samples from uveitis controls with typical intraocular lesions. Meanwhile, CSF IL-10 levels were elevated in 95.7% of the VRL patients, with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 95.7%, 100%, 100% and 88.9%, respectively. Key somatic mutations like MYD88 ^L265P and CD79B detected from CSF cfDNA and elevated CSF IL-10 levels can be promising adjuncts for primary vitreoretinal lymphoma diagnosis.

Central Nervous System Progression in Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma with Bilateral and Unilateral Involvement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a rare disease with high mortality rates. It has a poor prognosis mainly because of its tendency to spread to the central nervous system (CNS). The optimal treatment strategy for PVRL is unknown; ideally, a treatment should prevent spread to the CNS, and thereby prolong overall survival. PVRL may occur in one eye (unilateral PVRL), or in both (bilateral). We reviewed studies from the scientific literature to investigate whether the risk of CNS progression differs between bilateral and unilateral PVRL. The quality of most available studies was moderate, at best. From the available studies, we found no difference in the development of CNS disease between patients with bilateral PVRL and unilateral PVRL.

Abstract

Background: Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is either unilateral or bilateral at initial presentation. Progression to a central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is regularly observed and these patients seem to have an inferior survival. Knowledge of the predictive value of laterality for CNS progression may facilitate risk stratification and the development of more effective treatment strategies, and eventually, improve outcomes. The objective of this analysis is to estimate the risk of CNS progression for patients with bilateral versus unilateral involvement of PVRL. Methods: Systematic literature search for studies on CNS progression in PVRL with bilateral and unilateral involvement according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We assessed the risk of bias and the methodological quality of studies using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Risk ratios of CNS progression in PVRL with bilateral and unilateral involvement were calculated and combined via a meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-five small-sized (total n = 371 cases) studies were included. The majority of the studies were at medium to high risk of bias. Results suggest no significant difference in CNS progression between bilateral and unilateral PVRL, with a pooled relative risk ratio of 1.12 (95% confidence interval 0.89–1.41). Conclusions: CNS progression is common in PVRL. From the limited available evidence, there is no significant difference in CNS progression between bilateral and unilateral PVRL.

Diagnosing Vitreoretinal Lymphomas-An Analysis of the Sensitivity of Existing Tools

Simple Summary

Diagnostics of vitreoretinal lymphoma is very challenging, as the possibility of receiving false negative results is common. We retrospectively analyzed the sensitivity of the most commonly used diagnostic methods including ancillary immunohistochemistry, Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88 (MyD88) L256P mutation analysis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for monoclonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) and T-cell Receptor (TCR) genes, flow cytometry, and IL10 and IL6 analysis, to diagnose vitreoretinal lymphomas from published data in the literature. MyD88 mutation analysis caused by a hotspot mutation in MyD88 was the most sensitive and had the lowest coefficient of variation.

Abstract

Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is a rare ocular pathology that is notorious for mimicking chronic uveitis, which is a seemingly benign condition in comparison. The most common form of VRL is the diffuse large B-cell type, and there has been a high mortality rate. This dismal prognosis can be improved significantly if the disease is diagnosed early, but until now there is no consensus on an appropriate diagnostic algorithm. We conducted a retrospective search of PubMed Central^® and analyzed results from thirty-three studies that were published between 2011–2021. The chosen studies incorporated some popular testing tools for VRL, and our analyses focused on comparing the average sensitivity of five diagnostic methods. The methods included cytology including ancillary immunohistochemistry, Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88 (MyD88) mutation analysis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for monoclonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) and T-cell Receptor (TCR) genes, flow cytometry, and IL10 and IL6 analysis. Across the varied diagnostic methods employed in thirty-three studies explored in this analysis, MyD88 mutation assay emerged as a strong contender given its sensitivity and low coefficient of variation. There is an imminent need for the introduction of newer assays that can further improve the sensitivity of identifying MyD88 mutation in cancer cells seen in the vitreous.

The Single-Cell Sequencing: A Dazzling Light Shining on the Dark Corner of Cancer

Tumorigenesis refers to the process of clonal dysplasia that occurs due to the collapse of normal growth regulation in cells caused by the action of various carcinogenic factors. These “successful” tumor cells pass on the genetic templates to their generations in evolutionary terms, but they also constantly adapt to ever-changing host environments. A unique peculiarity known as intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is extensively involved in tumor development, metastasis, chemoresistance, and immune escape. An understanding of ITH is urgently required to identify the diversity and complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME), but achieving this understanding has been a challenge. Single-cell sequencing (SCS) is a powerful tool that can gauge the distribution of genomic sequences in a single cell and the genetic variability among tumor cells, which can improve the understanding of ITH. SCS provides fundamental ideas about existing diversity in specific TMEs, thus improving cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction, as well as improving the monitoring of therapeutic response. Herein, we will discuss advances in SCS and review SCS application in tumors based on current evidence.

[Ocular lymphoma : Precise diagnostics and classification as key for successful personalized treatment]

BACKGROUND

Personalized medicine is nowadays the standard of care for patients with oncological diseases. A prime example is the lymphoma, which has substantial points of contact with ophthalmological care due to the intraocular and periocular involvement.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides a description of the current personalized diagnostics and treatment of ocular lymphomas.

METHODS

This article constructs a relationship between the current knowledge in the literature, guidelines and recommendations and the clinical experience with ocular lymphomas. It explains in particular the molecular and also individual personalized treatment concepts.

RESULTS

The primary suspicion of lymphatic or other ocular oncological diseases is raised by an ophthalmologist based on clinical symptoms. The exact diagnostic procedure is carried out with molecular biological techniques, such as immunohistology and polymerase chain reaction analyses. A staging of the mass is indispensable and the stage classification according to the Ann Arbor criteria for a correct assignment of the lymphoma is of clinical importance. Based on these precise diagnostics an individualized choice of treatment and subsequent personalized follow-up care are carried out. During the complete process from the diagnostic procedure to treatment and aftercare, psycho-oncological support should be offered to the patient.

CONCLUSION

Personalized medicine is already actively performed in the care of ocular lymphomas. The patient is in the forefront and plays a decisive role. By considering the special features of the tumor and patient parameters, the life expectation and relapse-free interval as well as quality of life have been improved for many types of lymphoma. It must be assumed that these advantages also apply to ophthalmology.

Eye involvement in primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) may manifest initially in the eye (termed vitreoretinal lymphoma or VRL) or in non-ocular CNS compartments, or in both. The nature of the onset of PCNSL implies two clinical specialists - ophthalmologists and neuro-oncologists - independently may assess the primary presentation of this rare malignancy. Clinically relevant perspectives on expectations of PCNSL manifestation in both ocular and non-ocular CNS compartments would help inform management practices in each specialty, which should impact clinical outcomes. A recent increase in the number of published PCNSL cohort studies provides new opportunity to review the current prevalence rates of ocular involvement, and the timing of this involvement over the course of disease. In PCNSL cohorts defined by non-ocular CNS compartment involvement, with or without ocular involvement (termed "PCNSL ± ocular involvement" cohorts), mean rates of concomitant VRL at diagnosis, or at any time during the course, are 10% and 16%, respectively. Only a few individuals within this cohort group present with exclusive eye disease (<5%), and the rate of secondary ocular involvement is only 5-9%. In PCNSL cohorts defined by the involvement of the ocular compartment, with or without non-ocular CNS involvement (termed "VRL ± non-ocular CNS involvement" cohorts), 58% of persons have a primary ocular diagnosis, which carries a 50% risk of secondary involvement in the CNS beyond the eye. Rates of non-ocular CNS involvement with VRL at diagnosis or over the course of disease are 41% and 69%, respectively.

MYD88 in the driver's seat of B-cell lymphomagenesis: from molecular mechanisms to clinical implications

More than 50 subtypes of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) are recognized in the most recent World Health Organization classification of 2016. The current treatment paradigm, however, is largely based on 'one-size-fits-all' immune-chemotherapy. Unfortunately, this therapeutic strategy is inadequate for a significant number of patients. As such, there is an indisputable need for novel, preferably targeted, therapies based on a biologically driven classification and risk stratification. Sequencing studies identified mutations in the MYD88 gene as an important oncogenic driver in B-cell lymphomas. MYD88 mutations constitutively activate NF-κB and its associated signaling pathways, thereby promoting B-cell proliferation and survival. High frequencies of the hotspot MYD88(L265P) mutation are observed in extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Waldenström macroglobulinemia, thereby demonstrating this mutation's potential as a disease marker. In addition, the presence of mutant MYD88 predicts survival outcome in B-NHL subtypes and it provides a therapeutic target. Early clinical trials targeting MYD88 have shown encouraging results in relapsed/refractory B-NHL. Patients with these disorders can benefit from analysis for the MYD88 hotspot mutation in liquid biopsies, as a minimally invasive method to demonstrate treatment response or resistance. Given these clear clinical implications and the crucial role of MYD88 in lymphomagenesis, we expect that analysis of this gene will increasingly be used in routine clinical practice, not only as a diagnostic classifier, but also as a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker directing precision medicine. This review focuses on the pivotal mechanistic role of mutated MYD88 and its clinical implications in B-NHL.