Intraocular biopsy of uveal melanoma Risk assessment and identification of genetic prognostic markers

Metastases from uveal melanoma may lack S100 expression: A clinico-pathologic and immunohistochemical study with emphasis on potential causes and diagnostic implications

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, with a high mortality rate due to metastasis, primarily to the liver. The differential diagnosis of metastatic UM, particularly in distinguishing it from cutaneous melanoma (CM), can be challenging due to overlapping histopathological features. This study investigates the immunohistochemical expression of S100 in a cohort of 41 cases, including 13 metastatic UMs, 18 metastatic CMs, and 10 primary UMs. Our results demonstrate a significant lack of S100 immunoreactivity in metastatic UM, with 84.6 % of cases showing negativity, in contrast to the diffuse positivity seen in both primary UM and metastatic CM. This finding suggests that the absence of S100 could serve as a useful marker to differentiate metastatic UM from CM, especially in cases where the primary tumor is unknown. Furthermore, the study highlights the potential diagnostic pitfall of relying solely on S100 expression on small biopsies. The absence of S100 in metastatic UM may reflect a shift in antigenic expression, possibly due to tumor dedifferentiation or clonal selection of S100-negative cells with a higher metastatic potential. Our findings emphasize the importance of employing a comprehensive immunohistochemical panel, including markers such as HMB45, SOX10, and Melan-A, in the accurate diagnosis of metastatic melanomas.

Clinical Implications of Ultrasound-Based Morphology in Choroidal Melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency of different B-scan morphologies and their association with clinical features and outcomes.

DESIGN

Cohort study of patients enrolled in the Prospective Ocular Tumor Study from January 2000 to January 2024 initially seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive inclusion of patients with posterior uveal melanoma.

METHODS

B-scan ultrasounds were performed by an experienced technician and treatment modalities were implemented by the attending oncologist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Tumors were classified by shape as observed on B-scan. Enucleation-free survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival rates were analyzed using Cox-regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Among 1021 cases of uveal melanoma, 739 (72.4%) were dome-shaped, 119 (11.7%) were mushroom-shaped, 85 (8.3%) were multilobulated, 77 (7.5%) were minimally elevated, and 1 (0.1%) was diffuse. The median follow-up duration after presentation was 37 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3-324). The macula was more commonly involved in minimally elevated tumors compared with the other groups (63.6% vs. 13.8%, P < 0.001). These tumors also exhibited a larger proportion of high internal reflectivity (13% vs. 2.3%, P < 0.001). The multilobulated group exhibited a significantly larger diameter at baseline (median, 15 mm; IQR, 6.1-30), whereas the mushroom-shaped group had greater thickness (median, 7.9 mm; IQR, 1.3-17.3) compared with the other groups (P < 0.001). Enucleation-free survival at 36 months was lower for mushroom-shaped (60.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 47.7-70.3) and multilobulated tumors (71.1%; 95% CI, 55.7-82.7). At 36 months, multilobulated tumors had lower MFS (68.2%; 95% CI, 55-78.2) and overall survival (73.9%; 95% CI, 59.9-83.64). On multivariate analysis adjusted for tumor thickness and diameter, multilobulated melanomas had a higher risk of metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08; P = 0.003) and death (HR, 2.38; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Choroidal melanoma configuration by B-scan can vary from minimally elevated to dome-shaped to mushroom-shaped or multilobulated. Independent of presenting tumor size, multilobulated morphology was identified as a predictor for metastasis and death. Multilobulated melanomas, identified by a readily available tool such as ultrasonography, warrant a vigilant approach and close monitoring due to a potential association with poor prognosis.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Managing vitreoretinal complications in uveal melanoma: Surgical treatment and practical considerations

BACKGROUND

In the past few decades, the primary management for uveal melanoma has evolved from enucleation to eye-preserving treatments. However, despite achieving a high rate of local tumour control, complications following eye-preserving treatments still occur and are partly responsible for functional loss and secondary enucleation.

METHODS

A literature review by a broad international panel.

RESULTS

We summarised the current literature on utilizing vitreoretinal (VR) surgery for managing the complications of uveal melanoma. We also provided insights from the authors' personal experience and practical recommendations for clinical care.

CONCLUSIONS

With the advancement of VR instruments and surgical techniques and the combination of VR and ocular oncology knowledge ("Onco-VR"), it is now possible to manage or even prevent complications such as vitreous haemorrhage, retinal detachment, and toxic tumour syndrome.

Prognostic Value of BAP1 Protein Expression in Uveal Melanoma

The prognostic value of the traditional pathologic parameters that form part of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and genetic classifications using monosomy chromosome 3 and structural alterations in chromosome 8 are well established and are part of the diagnostic workup of uveal melanoma (UM). However, it has not been fully clarified whether nuclear protein expression of the tumor suppressor gene BAP1 (nBAP1) by immunohistochemistry alone is as powerful a predictor of overall survival (OS) and/or disease-specific survival (DSS) as chromosome analysis. The protein expression of nBAP1 was evaluated in a retrospective cohort study of 308 consecutive patients treated by primary enucleation between January 1974 and December 2022. We correlated clinical, pathologic, and cytogenetic characteristics to identify the best prognostic indicators for OS and DSS. Loss of nBAP1 was detected in 144/308 (47%) of patients. Loss of nBAP1 expression was significantly associated with poor survival. In patients with disomy chromosome 3, nBAP1 negative is significantly associated with poorer OS but not DSS. We observed that older age (>63 years), presence of metastasis, and nBAP1 negative remained independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. nBAP1 protein expression proved to be a more reliable prognostic indicator for OS than the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, M3 status, or The Cancer Genome Atlas classification in this cohort. This study provides support for accurate prognostication of UM patients in routine histology laboratories by immunohistochemistry for nBAP1 alone.

Choroidal biopsies; a review and optimised approach

The majority of choroidal tumours are diagnosed accurately with clinical examination and the additional data obtained from non-invasive imaging techniques. Choroidal biopsies may be undertaken for diagnostic clarity in cases such as small melanocytic or indeterminate lesions, identifying the primary tumour in the case of choroidal metastases or the subclassification of rarer conditions such as uveal lymphoma. There is however an increasing use of biopsy techniques for prognostication in uveal melanoma. This review explores the main indications and surgical techniques for tumour acquisition, and the optimised approach utilised by the current authors to improve successful yield for histological and genetic analysis.

Genetic status affects disease-specific mortality but not the incidence of local recurrence in patients with uveal melanoma

OBJECTIVE

Increased disease-specific mortality has been observed among patients with local recurrence (LR) from uveal melanoma, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if copy number alterations of chromosomes 3 and 8q, at the time of diagnosis, increase the incidence of LR and if disease-specific mortality among patients with LR depends on the chromosome status of the primary tumor.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study SUBJECTS: The study included 239 consecutive patients with primary uveal melanoma (choroidal or ciliary body) treated with Ru-106 brachytherapy, from January 2009 to December 2019 at a single national referral center.

METHODS

Cox-regression modelling and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the effect of chromosomes 3 and 8q status on the incidence of LR and disease-specific mortality following the event of LR. Multistate models were used to illustrate the probabilities over time of patients being: 'alive and disease-free', 'alive with LR', 'dead from uveal melanoma metastases', or 'dead from other causes' split on chromosomes 3 and 8q status.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

LR incidence and disease-specific mortality RESULTS: LR was observed in 42 patients (16%). Overall incidence of LR was not affected by chromosome 3 and 8q status (p=0.87), albeit LR occurred earlier in patients with aberrations of chromosomes 3 and/or 8q compared to patients with normal copy number of chromosomes 3 and 8q, median time from primary diagnosis to LR was 1.6 years (IQR: 1.0-2.0) and 3.2 years (IQR 2.1-5.0), respectively. Cox regression found LR to be an independent risk factor for disease-specific mortality (HR 2.7 (95%CI 1.5-5.0) among all patients, but multistate models demonstrated very low risk of disease-specific death among patients with normal chromosomes 3 and 8q status, even following a LR.

CONCLUSIONS

Copy number alterations of chromosomes 3 or 8q in the primary uveal melanoma did not increase the overall incidence of LR. However, the development of a LR enhanced the risk of disease-specific mortality among patients with copy number alterations of chromosomes 3 and/or 8q. Even after a LR, disease-specific mortality remained low among patients with normal copy numbers of chromosomes 3 and 8q.

Genetics and RNA Regulation of Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignant tumor and the most frequent melanoma not affecting the skin. While the rate of UM occurrence is relatively low, about 50% of patients develop metastasis, primarily to the liver, with lethal outcome despite medical treatment. Notwithstanding that UM etiopathogenesis is still under investigation, a set of known mutations and chromosomal aberrations are associated with its pathogenesis and have a relevant prognostic value. The most frequently mutated genes are BAP1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, and SF3B1, with mutually exclusive mutations occurring in GNAQ and GNA11, and almost mutually exclusive ones in BAP1 and SF3B1, and BAP1 and EIF1AX. Among chromosomal aberrations, monosomy of chromosome 3 is the most frequent, followed by gain of chromosome 8q, and full or partial loss of chromosomes 1 and 6. In addition, epigenetic mechanisms regulated by non-coding RNAs (ncRNA), namely microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, have also been investigated. Several papers investigating the role of ncRNAs in UM have reported that their dysregulated expression affects cancer-related processes in both in vitro and in vivo models. This review will summarize current findings about genetic mutations, chromosomal aberrations, and ncRNA dysregulation establishing UM biology.

Outcome Measures of New Technologies in Uveal Melanoma: Review from the European Vision Institute Special Interest Focus Group Meeting

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular tumor in adults. New diagnostic procedures and basic science discoveries continue to change our patient management paradigms. A recent meeting of the European Vision Institute (EVI) special interest focus group was held on "Outcome Measures of New Technologies in Uveal Melanoma," addressing the latest advances in UM, starting with genetic developments, then moving on to imaging and treatment of the primary tumor, as well as to investigating the most recent developments in treating metastases, and eventually taking care of the patient's well-being. This review highlights the meeting's presentations in the context of the published literature.

Uveal Melanoma - Standardised Procedure in Diagnosis, Therapy and Surveillance

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma is a rare intraocular tumour, for which there is currently no national evidence-based guideline in Germany. The aim of this project was to provide a common standard operating procedure (SOP) for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care of uveal melanoma, within the network of German leading oncology centres funded by German Cancer Aid. The SOP was created as part of a moderated consensus process.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In a multistage process, a common SOP was developed for the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of uveal melanoma, as based on current knowledge of the subject.

UVEAL MELANOMA BIOPSY A REVIEW

In intraocular tumors, diagnosis is usually based on clinical examination and imaging without the need for invasive surgery or tissue sampling. The diagnosis can be confirmed by biopsy, however, in the case of intraocular malignancy, the biopsy is considered controversial. Due to the development of uveal melanoma cytogenetic prognostics and the progression in generalised uveal melanoma treatment, intraocular melanoma biopsy is becoming increasingly important. Diagnostic biopsy of intraocular tumors is indicated in cases of diagnostic uncertainty for findings with conflicting non-invasive test results and for small melanocyte lesions. Tumor prognostic biopsy is performed to obtain a tissue sample for tumor cytogenetic testing, which can help to determine the prognosis and specific metastatic risk of the patient. For anterior segment tumors, anterior chamber fluid sampling, thin-needle iris biopsy, punch biopsy, surgical biopsy or biopsy using vitrectomy may be used. For posterior segment tumors, procedures include transscleral or transretinal thin-needle biopsy, vitrectomy-assisted biopsy, punch biopsy, endoresection or transscleral exoresection. Complications of intraocular melanoma biopsy include too small or non-valuable sample collection, intra-tumoral heterogeneity, intra-ocular trauma and induction of intraocular or extraocular tumor dissemination.

Therapy of uveal melanoma A Review

The aim of intraocular melanoma therapy is to achieve local tumor control, reduce the risk of metastasis development, preserve the eyeball and possibly the visual function of the eye. The choice of therapeutic approach requires a comprehensive view and individual approach to each patient with uveal melanoma. Factors considered include local finding (location, tumor size and shape, tumor activity, central visual acuity, intraocular complications), age and the patients overall physical and psychological condition, as well as the patients wishes. The most widely used method of uveal melanoma treatment is radiotherapy. The effect of radiation is caused by the absorption of ionizing radiation energy, the effect of radiation on the cell is manifested by cell death (depletion), or by a cytogenetic information change (mutation). Brachytherapy uses scleral applicators with radionuclide - ruthenium (Ru-106) applicators dominate in Europe and iodine (I-125) applicators in the USA. In external radiotherapy, the source of ionizing radiation is outside the patients body. Both stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy are used. In the Czech Republic, treatment is carried out using Leksell gamma knife or CyberKnife, while proton therapy dominates in the world. The development of serious radiation complications (radiation retinopathy, neuropathy, neovascular glaucoma, toxic tumor syndrome, etc.) should be considered. Surgical therapy involves a variety of invasive procedures. Iridectomy is performed for iris melanoma. Anteriorly located choroidal melanomas and / or ciliary body melanomas can be resolved by transscleral resection (exoresection). For posterior choroidal melanomas, a combination of external tumor irradiation with pars plana vitrectomy is used. Enucleation is a method of choice in advanced tumors that cannot be effectively irradiated. Orbital exenteration is indicated in advanced tumors with extrabulbar spread or in relapsed tumor after previous enucleation.

Genetic Biomarkers in Melanoma of the Ocular Region: What the Medical Oncologist Should Know

Melanoma of the ocular region (ocular melanoma) comprises about 5% of all patients with melanoma and covers posterior uveal melanoma, iris melanoma, and conjunctival melanoma. The risk of metastasis is much higher in patients with ocular melanoma compared to a primary melanoma of the skin. The subtypes of ocular melanoma have distinct genetic features, which should be taken into consideration when making clinical decisions. Most relevant for current practice is the absence of BRAF mutations in posterior uveal melanoma, although present in some iris melanomas and conjunctival melanomas. In this review, we discuss the genetic biomarkers of the subtypes of ocular melanoma and their impacts on the clinical care of these patients.

Multicenter External Validation of the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online: An OOG Collaborative Study

Uveal melanoma (UM) is fatal in ~50% of patients as a result of disseminated disease. This study aims to externally validate the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online V3 (LUMPO3) to determine its reliability in predicting survival after treatment for choroidal melanoma when utilizing external data from other ocular oncology centers. Anonymized data of 1836 UM patients from seven international ocular oncology centers were analyzed with LUMPO3 to predict the 10-year survival for each patient in each external dataset. The analysts were masked to the patient outcomes. Model predictions were sent to an independent statistician to evaluate LUMPO3’s performance using discrimination and calibration methods. LUMPO3’s ability to discriminate between UM patients who died of metastatic UM and those who were still alive was fair-to-good, with C-statistics ranging from 0.64 to 0.85 at year 1. The pooled estimate for all external centers was 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 0.75). Agreement between observed and predicted survival probabilities was generally good given differences in case mix and survival rates between different centers. Despite the differences between the international cohorts of patients with primary UM, LUMPO3 is a valuable tool for predicting all-cause mortality in this disease when using data from external centers.

Uveal Melanoma Biopsy: A Review

Intraocular tumor diagnosis is based on clinical findings supported by additional imaging tools, such as ultrasound, optical coherence tomography and angiographic techniques, usually without the need for invasive procedures or tissue sampling. Despite improvements in the local treatment of uveal melanoma (UM), the prevention and treatment of the metastatic disease remain unsolved, and nearly 50% of patients develop liver metastasis. The current model suggests that tumor cells have already spread by the time of diagnosis, remaining dormant until there are favorable conditions. Tumor sampling procedures at the time of primary tumor diagnosis/treatment are therefore now commonly performed, usually not to confirm the diagnosis of UM, but to obtain a tissue sample for prognostication, to assess patient's specific metastatic risk. Moreover, several studies are ongoing to identify genes specific to UM tumorigenesis, leading to several potential targeted therapeutic strategies. Genetic information can also influence the surveillance timing and metastatic screening type of patients affected by UM. In spite of the widespread use of biopsies in general surgical practice, in ophthalmic oncology the indications and contraindications for tumor biopsy continue to be under debate. The purpose of this review paper is to critically evaluate the role of uveal melanoma biopsy in ophthalmic oncology.