Autologous versus allogeneic versus umbilical cord sera for the treatment of severe dry eye disease: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

Biological topicals in ocular surface disorders

Topical biological agents represent a significant advancement in the treatment of ocular surface diseases, offering a regenerative and therapeutic approach beyond conventional therapies. These agents are derived from serum (autologous or allogeneic), platelets, amniotic membrane, and pooled intravenous immunoglobulin. Their efficacy stems from their rich composition of growth factors, cytokines, and anti-inflammatory molecules that promote tissue healing, reduce inflammation, and enhance corneal regeneration. Autologous serum eye drops, closely mimicking natural tears, have been widely utilized for conditions such as dry eye disease, neurotrophic keratopathy, and persistent epithelial defects. Similarly, platelet derivatives, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet lysate (PL), have demonstrated accelerated wound healing and nerve regeneration benefits. Amniotic membrane extracts and human amniotic fluid eye drops share the anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties of the human amniotic membrane. Recent advancements have introduced the use of topical IVIG, which modulates immune responses in severe inflammatory dry eye conditions, such as ocular graft-versus-host disease. Despite these promising applications, challenges such as variability in preparation, storage limitations, and cost remain. Nevertheless, the future of topical biological agents is promising, with emerging recombinant therapies and personalized treatment approaches shaping modern ophthalmologic care. As research continues to expand, these agents are poised to become integral components in managing ocular surface disorders, improving patient outcomes, and reducing dependence on traditional therapies.

Use of an Eyelid Pressure Patch Concomitantly with a Decellularized Dehydrated Amniotic Membrane for Ocular Surface Disease Management

INTRODUCTION

Persistent corneal epithelial defects (PCEDs) occur when conditions like dry eye disease (DED), neurotrophic keratitis (NK), and limbal stem cell deficiency impair corneal healing, leading to risks of infection, scarring, or perforation. Decellularized, dehydrated pure amniotic membrane basement membrane (AMBM) supports healing by promoting cell adhesion, growth, and inflammation reduction. Eyelid pressure patching helps stabilize the AMBM, protects the cornea, and enhances its therapeutic effects.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 144 eyes treated with either a single-layer or three-layer decellularized AMBM combined with a 24-h eyelid pressure patch.

RESULTS

Of the patients included, 90% received a single-layer AMBM and 10% a three-layer AMBM. In the single-layer group, 100% of cases showed complete healing and AMBM dissolution. In the three-layer group, 100% showed corneal staining improvement, but 20-30% of the AMBM remained undissolved. No patients reported experiencing pain, discomfort, or infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining eyelid pressure patching with amniotic membrane treatment is a safe and effective approach for healing persistent corneal epithelial defects.

Emerging treatment strategies in dry eye disease: Potential of blood-derived approaches and natural plant-based products

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular condition characterized by chronic inflammation and tear film disruption. It affects millions of people worldwide, causing significant eye discomfort and vision disturbances. Despite its prevalence, DED remains a complex condition that is not yet fully understood. It can arise from various ocular pathologies, including endocrinological disorders such as diabetes and Graves' orbitopathy. Natural products, including plant- and blood-based therapies, have shown promise in alleviating DED symptoms and may represent effective therapeutic approaches. In this study, we review recent research on natural product treatments for DED, focusing on blood-derived therapies (e.g., autologous serum, albumin serum, and allogeneic serum) and plant-based compounds such as omega-3 fatty acids (O3FA), omega-6 fatty acids (O6FA), antioxidants, polyphenols, and flavonoids. Additionally, we examine the efficacy, mechanisms of action, and delivery systems of these treatments, highlighting the potential of blood-derived therapies, polyphenols, and flavonoids to improve or treat DED through multiple mechanisms. However, the use of these natural products as instilled drugs is limited by challenges such as solubility, stability, and biological barriers. Finally, we discuss drug delivery systems and structural modifications designed to enhance the therapeutic effects of these treatments, emphasizing their potential in managing DED.

Autologous blood in the management of ocular surface disorders

Autologous blood therapy has emerged as a promising modality in managing ocular surface disorders. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current literature regarding the use of autologous blood in ocular surface disorders, encompassing its physiological basis, clinical applications, techniques, challenges, and future perspectives. The ocular surface, comprising the cornea, conjunctiva, and tear film, plays a critical role in maintaining visual function, and its disruption can lead to various pathological conditions. With its rich composition of growth factors, cytokines, and other bioactive molecules, autologous blood offers therapeutic potential in promoting corneal wound healing, reducing inflammation, and improving tear film stability. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of autologous blood therapy in diverse ocular surface disorders, including persistent epithelial defects, neurotrophic keratopathy, and dry eye disease. However, challenges such as variability in treatment response, adverse effects, and optimal patient selection remain areas of concern. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of action, refine treatment protocols, and explore synergistic approaches with other therapeutic modalities. Despite these challenges, autologous blood therapy holds promise as a valuable adjunctive treatment option for ocular surface disorders, offering new avenues for improving patient outcomes and quality of life. This review examines the mechanisms underlying ocular surface disorders while discussing existing autologous blood-based therapies for managing these disorders. Current clinical trials are also summarized, and a comparison between autologous blood therapy and conventional eyedrops is attempted. Finally, safe techniques and protocols for autologous blood medicine are elucidated, and adverse effects and future perspectives of this novel therapy are reviewed.

Blood component therapy for dry eye disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective

Blood component therapy has shown promising potential as an emerging treatment for dry eye disease; however, it remains unclear which specific blood component is the most effective. This study aims to compare the efficacy of different blood components in the treatment of dry eye disease through a network meta-analysis, with the goal of providing the latest and most reliable evidence for clinical practice.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases, with the search concluding on June 1, 2024. Two independent researchers performed literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment.

Results

A total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 898 patients with dry eye disease were included. Six different blood components were utilized in treating dry eye disease, with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) being the most widely used. The results of the network meta-analysis indicated that platelet-rich plasma eye drops (PRPD) significantly outperformed artificial tears (AT) in improving the corneal fluorescein staining score (CFSS), while autologous serum (ALS) and umbilical cord serum (UCS) also demonstrated significantly better effects than AT in enhancing tear break-up time (TBUT). Additionally, ALS, PRP injection (PRPI), and PRPD showed significantly superior outcomes compared to AT in improving the ocular surface disease index (OSDI). However, no statistically significant differences were found among the various treatment modalities regarding their effects on Schirmer's I value, CFSS, TBUT, and OSDI. SUCRA analysis predicted that UCS was the most effective in improving Schirmer's I value and TBUT, while PRP excelled in enhancing CFSS and OSDI. Limitations such as publication bias and issues related to randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding may affect the reliability of the current findings.

Conclusion

Blood component therapy can significantly improve the pathological damage and ocular surface health in patients with dry eye disease. For those with aqueous-deficient dry eye, UCS may represent the optimal treatment option. In contrast, for patients with more severe corneal epithelial damage, PRP may offer a more effective therapeutic approach.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42024534091.

Therapeutic Effects of Umbilical Cord Serum for Dry Eye Disease: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Dry eye disease (DED) is a prevalent ocular condition that significantly impacts quality of life. Umbilical cord serum (UCS) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option, but its efficacy requires further investigation. This systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of UCS eye drops in the treatment of DED.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of science, Embase, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Network, to identify relevant clinical trials. The efficacy of UCS was assessed based on key outcome measures, such as the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, and corneal fluorescein staining scores. Meta-analyses were performed to pool the results, and the findings were presented in a forest plot.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis, with two relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 204 patients. Most of the included studies had a follow-up time of less than 2 months. The pooled results showed that UCS treatment significantly improved the OSDI, with a mean difference (MD) of -9.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], -12.0, -6.36) compared to baseline. Additionally, the TBUT values were higher in the UCS group, with an MD of 2.65 (95% CI, 0.93, 4.36). The Schirmer I test results showed an improvement, with an MD of 1.18 (95% CI, 0.30, 2.06). The fluorescein staining score were also lower in the UCS treatment group, with an MD of -4.71 (95% CI, -5.72, -3.69).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggested that UCS eye drops had a beneficial therapeutic effect on DED, significantly improving the OSDI, TBUT, Schirmer I test, and corneal fluorescein staining scores. However, larger RCTs with longer follow-up periods were needed to further evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of UCS in the management of DED.

Allogeneic serum-based eye drops may give better results than autologous drops in Sjögren's syndrome dry eye

PURPOSE

Sjögren's syndrome (SS) may cause severe dry eye symptoms. One of the therapeutic option known for almost 40 years are autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs). Due to the presence of many pro-inflammatory factors in the autologous serum of SS patients, the use of allogeneic serum is often considered a better option. In our facility almost one-fifth of the patients using allogeneic serum-based eye drops (alloSEDs) suffered from autoimmune diseases, including SS. The study aim was to compare the effectiveness of both ASEDs and alloSEDs in SS patients.

METHODS

From the group of SS patients using alloSEDs, five female SS patients aged 39-73 years were selected. They had the longest history of the use of the product. The analysis was based on OSDI forms and internal questionnaires which compared the effects of ASEDs and alloSEDs application. The patients used alloSEDs for a period of 5-28 months. All had previously used ASEDs for at least 2 years.

RESULTS

For all five patients the mean OSDI after application of ASEDs and before introducing alloSEDs was 68.71, while the mean OSDI after the use of alloSEDs was 30.49.

CONCLUSION

In SS the treatment results are better with alloSEDs than with ASEDs. Almost all SS patients who applied both autologous and allogeneic drops reported better effects with the latter as also confirmed by the study cases.

[Head-to-head studies on connective tissue diseases and vasculitides]

Head-to-head (H2H) studies enable the direct comparison of several alternative therapeutic approaches and thus provide the evidence-based foundation for the relative position of one treatment as compared to others for a specific indication. These trials constitute an important addition to placebo-controlled clinical trials. Among the controlled clinical trials not performed by the pharmaceutical industry, there are a relevant number of H2H trials for connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and vasculitides, particularly for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). This article encompasses a review of the H2H trials for CTDs and vasculitides and discusses their relevance for current treatment algorithms. For SLE the H2H trials were predominantly performed for the treatment of lupus nephritis, demonstrating the impact of low-dose cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate as well as azathioprine for maintenance therapy. In recent H2H trials rituximab could be established as induction and maintenance therapy for AAV, which has now been incorporated into current treatment guidelines. Further comparative trials will be necessary in order to select the most effective and safest treatment for every patient, in the sense of personalized medicine.

Clinical features and comprehensive treatment of persistent corneal epithelial dysfunction after cataract surgery

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of tobramycin/dexamethasone eye ointment in treating persistent corneal epithelial dysfunction (PED) after cataract surgery.

METHODS

26 cases diagnosed as PED after cataract surgery accept the tobramycin/dexamethasone ophthalmic ointment and intense pulse light treatment in the Xiamen University of Xiamen eye center between September 2016 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, mainly including clinical manifestations, characteristics of morphological changes imaged by in vivo confocal microscopy, meibomian glands infrared photography, lipid layer thickness (LLT), management and therapeutic effects.

RESULTS

There were 26 eyes, include 8(35%) males and 15(65%) females with an average age of 69.6 ± 5.2 years(50 to 78 years). The mean hospitalization time was (18.4 ± 7.5) days after cataract surgery. Twenty patients had meibomian gland dysfunction. Infrared photography revealed varying loss in the meibomian glands, with a mean score of 3.8 ± 1.2 for gland loss. The mean LLT was 61.6 ± 8.4 nm. After treatment, 20 patients were cured, and 3 received amniotic membrane transplantation. After treatment, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best-corrected vision activity (BCVA) improved (P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) before and after treatment (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The early manifestation of PED after surgery is punctate staining of the corneal epithelium. Tobramycin and dexamethasone eye ointment bandages have a good repair effect. The meibomian gland massage combined with intense pulse light treatment can effectively shorten the course of the disease.

Perioperative intense pulsed light to prevent and improve symptoms of post-laser corneal refractive surgery dry eye. A randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative IPL therapy in preventing postoperative ocular surface disorders in patients undergoing corneal laser refractive surgery.

DESIGN

randomized, controlled, clinical trial with triple-blinding.

METHODS

Setting: Vissum Miranza - Alicante; Study population: 61 patients randomized in two groups: 31 study patients (perioperative IPL + laser refractive surgery) and 30 control patients (perioperative placebo + laser refractive surgery). Follow-up was conducted over a 6-month period; Intervention: Each participants underwent three IPL sessions with a two-week interval between each session (pre-surgery, post-surgery week-one, and post-surgery week-three). For controls, placebo was administered following the same protocol.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

visual outcomes and refraction, slit-lamp examination, corneal topography, visual analogue scale questionnaire and Oculus Keratograph 5 M including tear meniscus height, non-invasive tear break- up time, ocular redness, infrared meibography and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire.

RESULTS

61 randomized eyes were included. No significant differences were observed in terms of uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), refractive error or corneal aberrations. A statistically significant improvement in OSDI score (change -8.47, p = 0.043), tear meniscus (change 0.05 mm, p = 0.004) and Meibography (change -0.42, p = 0.012) was observed at the third postoperative month in the study group. Additionally, at the sixth postoperative month, there were statistically significant improvements in tear meniscus (change 0.06 mm, p = 0.018), tear break-up-time (change 1.68 s, p = 0.039) and Meibography (change -0.37, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that perioperative IPL therapy applied to laser corneal refractive surgery improves objective and subjective ocular surface parameters over non-IPL-treated control patients and early postoperative dry eye symptoms.

Update on Dry Eye Disease Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Although the ultimate goal of dry eye disease (DED) management is to restore the ocular surface and tear film homeostasis and address any accompanying symptoms, addressing this is not an easy task. Despite the wide range of current treatment modalities targeting multiple aspects of DED, the available DED management literature is quite heterogeneous, rendering evaluation or comparison of treatment outcomes hard or almost impossible. There is still a shortage of well-designed, large-scale, nonsponsored, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating long-term safety and efficacy of many targeted therapies individually or used in combination, in the treatment of identified subgroups of patients with DED. This review focuses on the treatment modalities in DED management and aims to reveal the current evidence available as deduced from the outcomes of RCTs.

Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of twenty versus fifty percent autologous serum eye drops in treatment of dry eye

Purpose

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two concentration of autologous serum (AS) 20% vs 50% in recalcitrant moderate-to-severe dry eye patients.

Methods

A double-blind prospective, interventional, and randomized study was done on 44 patients (80 eyes) clinically diagnosed with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED) that was refractory to conventional treatment, and all patients were treated with AS20% or AS50% for 12 weeks. We documented Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear film breakup time (TBUT), OXFORD corneal staining score (OSS), and Schirmer test (ST) at baseline, 2,4,8, and 12 weeks. These parameters were compared in both groups and between the groups by using Student's t-test. The study included 11 males and 33 females.

Results

Out of 80 eyes, 33 eyes had moderate and 47 had severe DED. The age of patients in AS20% was 44.73 ± 14.37 years, and in AS50% was 46.41 ± 14.47 years. The most common etiology associated with DED was secondary Sjogren syndrome. In moderate DED, both the groups showed significant improvement in both subjective and objective parameters. But in severe DED, the AS20% group failed to show any significant improvement objectively, though subjective improvement was present.

Conclusion

In refractory severe DED patients, AS50% is better option for treatment and in moderate DED both concentrations of autologous serum are effective.

Therapeutic Hyper-CL soft contact lens in Sjögren's syndrome

Purpose

Observations

Conclusions and importance