Natural history of acute upper GI bleeding due to tumours: short-term success and long-term recurrence with or without endoscopic therapy

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding as a warning sign of gastrointestinal cancer

Background

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a prevalent etiology for hospital admissions on a global scale. However, the significance of UGIB as a warning sign of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is frequently disregarded due to its uncommon and atypical symptoms.

Methods

In the Kailuan study, participants diagnosed with UGIB were assigned as the case group and were randomly matched in a 1:4 ratio with a control group of comparable age and sex from 2006 to 2018 in Tangshan. The statistical analysis included a total of 1250 UGIB patients and 5000 individuals without UGIB. The impact of UGIB on cancer incidence was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model, enabling the investigation of both site-specific and time-dependent effects of UGIB on cancer incidence.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 60.91 ± 13.08 years. Over an average follow-up period of 8.92 years, there were 102 cases of cancer in the UGIB group and 210 cases in the non-UGIB group. The results of the Cox model analysis indicated that the strength of association between UGIB and cancer depends on specific cancer site. Excluding patients with follow-up periods of less than 1, 3, and 5 years weakened the associations between UGIB and GI cancer in sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion

UGIB may serve as a sign of occult cancer, necessitating thorough evaluation of middle-aged and elderly patients presenting with this warning symptom to detect the possibility of missing a cancer diagnosis.

Overt gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cancer: Clinical characteristics and outcomes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) between cancer patients (CP) and non-cancer patients (NCP).

METHODS

This was a prospective study of patients admitted with overt GIB between 2013 and 2021. GIB etiology, management and outcomes including rebleeding and mortality, were compared between CP and NCP, and among patients with different types of cancer. The associations with categorical variables were assessed with the Chi-square test, and the t-test was used for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Of 674 patients admitted for GIB, 144 (21%) had cancer. 121(84%) CP had active disease, 49% had stage 4 cancer, and 78% had solid tumors, of whom 28 (20%) had luminal GI cancers. The most common were colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, and lymphomas. Compared to NCP, CP had higher age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, and were less likely to undergo endoscopy or endoscopic therapy. Severe GIB was equally prevalent in both groups, but CP had more severe anemia. Peptic ulcer was the most common etiology in both groups. Of 28 luminal cancer patients, 17(59%) bled from their tumors. Nine patients bled from cancer metastasis to the GI lumen. CP had higher in-hospital, one-month, one-year, and end-of-follow-up mortality. Length of hospital stay and re-bleeding rates did not differ between CP and NCP.

CONCLUSIONS

CP with GIB are less likely to have diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy and have higher mortality than NCP. Steps to identify CP at risk for GIB and to improve their outcomes merit further investigation.

Review article: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding - review of current evidence and implications for management

BACKGROUND

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common emergency requiring hospital-based care. Advances in care across pre-endoscopic, endoscopic and post-endoscopic phases have led to improvements in clinical outcomes.

AIMS

To provide a detailed, evidence-based update on major aspects of care across pre-endoscopic, endoscopic and post-endoscopic phases.

METHODS

We performed a structured bibliographic database search for each topic. If a recent high-quality meta-analysis was not available, we performed a meta-analysis with random effects methods and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Pre-endoscopic management of UGIB includes risk stratification, a restrictive red blood cell transfusion policy unless the patient has cardiovascular disease, and pharmacologic therapy with erythromycin and a proton pump inhibitor. Patients with cirrhosis should be treated with prophylactic antibiotics and vasoactive medications. Tranexamic acid should not be used. Endoscopic management of UGIB depends on the aetiology. For peptic ulcer disease (PUD) with high-risk stigmata, endoscopic therapy, including over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) and TC-325 powder spray, should be performed. For variceal bleeding, treatment should be customised by severity and anatomic location. Post-endoscopic management includes early enteral feeding for all UGIB patients. For high-risk PUD, PPI should be continued for 72 h, and rebleeding should initially be evaluated with a repeat endoscopy. For variceal bleeding, high-risk patients or those with further bleeding, a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt can be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of acute UGIB should include treatment plans for pre-endoscopic, endoscopic and post-endoscopic phases of care, and customise treatment decisions based on aetiology and severity of bleeding.

Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Treatment Strategies for Patients With Cancer of Unknown Primary: A Single-Center, Retrospective Change-in-Management Study

Background

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is difficult to diagnose and classify clinically, and the disease develops rapidly. Therefore, the primary tumor detected in patients with CUP plays a profound role in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. The search for the primary tumor of CUP is also one of the indications for 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Our objective was to evaluate the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in primary tumor detection and treatment formulation in patients with CUP.

Methods

Sixty-two patients with CUP were selected from a database consisting of 18 802 cases in the Jiangsu Cancer Hospital PET/CT center from May 18, 2016 to November 18, 2022. Clinical data and changes in treatment strategies before and after PET/CT were collected.

Results

A total of 42 primary tumors (42/62, 67.7%) were identified by PET/CT examination. The tumor staging of patients before conventional PET/CT imaging (such as CT/magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]/US) and after PET/CT did not change in 28 patients (28/62, 45.2%), whereas for 34 patients (34/62, 54.8%), tumor staging changed. Forty-five patients (45/62, 72.6%) had not developed treatment plans before PET/CT examination, but treatment plans were clarified after PET/CT examination. Thirteen patients (13/62, 21.0%) underwent changes in treatments before and after PET/CT examination. Among the 20 patients (20/62, 32.3%) whose primary tumors were not detected, 16 patients (16/20, 80.0%) had no treatment plans before PET/CT and the treatment plans were defined after PET/CT, 3 patients (3/20, 15.0%) changed the treatment plans before and after PET/CT, and 1 patient (1/20, 5.0%) did not change the treatment plan.

Conclusions

The 18F-FDG PET/CT plays an important role in the detection and staging of primary tumors in patients with CUP. The PET/CT findings can not only help clinicians develop appropriate treatment plans for patients with CUP but also serve as an effective approach to improve real-life treatment strategies for these patients.

MH-STRALP: A scoring system for prognostication in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common medical emergency and early assessment of its outcomes is vital for treatment decisions.

AIM

To develop a new scoring system to predict its prognosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 692 patients with UGIB were enrolled from two centers and divided into a training (n = 591) and a validation cohort (n = 101). The clinical data were collected to develop new prognostic prediction models. The endpoint was compound outcome defined as (1) demand for emergency surgery or vascular intervention, (2) being transferred to the intensive care unit, or (3) death during hospitalization. The models' predictive ability was compared with previously established scores by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Totally 22.2% (131/591) patients in the training cohort and 22.8% (23/101) in the validation cohort presented poor outcomes. Based on the stepwise-forward Logistic regression analysis, eight predictors were integrated to determine a new post-endoscopic prognostic scoring system (MH-STRALP); a nomogram was determined to present the model. Compared with the previous scores (GBS, Rockall, ABC, AIMS65, and PNED score), MH-STRALP showed the best prognostic prediction ability with area under the ROC curves (AUROCs) of 0.899 and 0.826 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. According to the calibration curve, decision curve analysis, and internal cross-validation, the nomogram showed good calibration ability and net clinical benefit in both cohorts. After removing the endoscopic indicators, the pre-endoscopic model (pre-MH-STRALP score) was conducted. Similarly, the pre-MH-STRALP score showed better predictive value (AUROCs of 0.868 and 0.767 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively) than the other pre-endoscopic scores.

CONCLUSION

The MH-STRALP score and pre-MH-STRALP score are simple, convenient, and accurate tools for prognosis prediction of UGIB, and may be applied for early decision on its management strategies.

Mortality Risk Scoring System in Patients after Bleeding from Cancers in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

Background/Aims

: Risk scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding have not been well validated for tumor bleeding. This study aimed to identify risk factors for mortality in patients with UGI cancer bleeding and to develop a predictive model.

Methods

: Consecutive patients with UGI cancers who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy for suspected bleeding were retrospectively included. Patient characteristics, endoscopic findings and 30-day mortality were assessed. A predictive model was made based on risk factors for mortality using logistic regression, and the area under the curve (AUC) of this model was calculated. It was then compared with other risk scoring systems.

Results

: In a total of 264 patients, 193 had tumor bleeding. Among them, 108 (56.0%), 76 (39.4%), and nine (4.7%) patients received conservative treatment, endoscopic therapy, and non-endoscopic hemostasis, respectively. Rebleeding occurred in 23 (21.3%), 26 (34.2%), and one (11.1%) patient(s), respectively. Our new model is composed of altered mental status, renal failure, rebleeding, age older than 65 years, and low serum albumin (all p<0.05). This model predicted 30-day mortality with an AUC of 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.86), which was significantly higher than AUCs of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall, and AIMS65 score (AUC=0.61, 0.64, and 0.69, respectively, all p<0.05).

Conclusions

: Our new scoring system provides a better prediction of 30-day mortality than existing scoring systems in patients with UGI cancer bleeding. This new scoring system can be used to predict and prepare these patients who are known to have high mortality.

Mortality in patients with unresectable gastric cancer complicated with tumor bleeding

BACKGROUND

gastric cancer (GC) is a gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasia which often complicates with GI bleeding. It is uncertain if bleeding worsens mortality in this group of patients.

AIMS

to compare 30- and 90-day mortality in patients with unresectable GC (uGC) and tumor bleeding versus patients with the same neoplasia without bleeding.

METHODS

a retrospective analysis of patients with uGC, with and without tumor bleeding was performed. Survival analysis for 30- and 90-days mortality was performed using Cox regression. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with mortality and first bleeding episode.

RESULTS

202 patients were included in the analysis (105 cases). Mortality at 90 days was 37.14 % for cases and 20.62 % for controls (p = 0.04). There was a significant difference in hazard ratio (HR) at 90 days for cases compared to controls (HR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.14-3.34, p = 0.02). Cases without palliative chemotherapy had the highest 90-days mortality (HR 5.43, 95 % CI 2.12-13.87, p < 0.01), compared to controls treated with chemotherapy. Predictors for first tumor bleeding were clinical stage IV (OR 2.93, 95 % CI 1.04-8.26, p = 0.04), Helicobacter pylori infection (OR 2.80, 95 % CI 1.35-5.80, p < 0.01) and histologic intestinal-subtype (OR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.07-4.30, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

tumor bleeding increases 90-days mortality in patients with uGC. Prevention of the first bleeding episode might improve outcome in these patients and the recognition of high-risk patients might help decision-making.

Emergency Endoscopic Hemostasis Using the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Technique for Severe Bleeding From Early Gastric Cancer: A Case Report

Bleeding from gastric cancer may lead to severe anemia and hypovolemic shock, and can be a life-threatening condition in affected patients; thus, achieving hemostasis is essential to improving their clinical course. While endoscopic hemostasis is recommended as the hemostatic modality of first choice, endoscopic hemostasis involving the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique is also being used, though under-reported. An 85-year-old man diagnosed with bleeding from gastric cancer was raced to our hospital for hemostasis. Emergency esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed a 45 mm-sized elevated lesion involving the coagula due to dripping bleeding from the surface of the posterior wall of the gastric lower body. EMR was performed without any technical difficulty, and hemostasis was achieved immediately. The patient was discharged without rebleeding. This case appears to support the usefulness of EMR as an emergency endoscopic hemostatic modality for severe bleeding from early gastric cancer.

Efficacy and safety of gastroscopic hemostasis in the treatment of acute gastric hemorrhage: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignant tumor with a high incidence and mortality rate worldwide for which acute bleeding is a common clinical complication. Gastroscopic hemostasis is an important method for treating acute bleeding in GC; however, its efficacy and safety remain controversial.

AIM

To systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of gastroscopic hemostasis for the treatment of acute gastric hemorrhage.

METHODS

The PUBMED, Web of Science, Wiley Library, EMBASE, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases were searched for studies related to gastroscopic hemostatic treatment for acute GC published through February 20, 2023. The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted, and literature quality was evaluated. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software (version 5.3), while Begg’s test for publication bias was performed using Stata 13.0 software.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials and two retrospective analyses were retrieved. Five studies had a low, two had an uncertain, and one had a high risk of bias. Compared with the control group, the hemostatic rate of gastroscopic hemostasis was increased [relative risk (RR) = 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08 to 1.43; P = 0.003]; the rate of rebleeding (RR = 0.27; 95%CI: 0.09 to 0.80; P = 0.02), rate of surgery transfer (RR = 0.16; 95%CI: 0.06 to 0.43; P = 0.0003), serum C-reactive protein level [mean difference (MD) = -5.16; 95%CI: -6.11 to 4.21; P < 0.00001], interleukin-6 level (MD = -6.37; 95%CI: -10.33 to -2.42; P = 0.002), and tumor necrosis factor-α level (MD = -2.29; 95%CI: -4.06 to -0.52; P = 0.01) were decreased; and the quality of life improvement rate was increased (RR = 1.95; 95%C I= 1.41-2.71; P < 0.0001). Begg’s test revealed no significant publication bias.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic hemostasis were higher than those of the control group, suggesting that it is an effective treatment for acute GC hemorrhage.

Predictive factors and prognosis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in gastric cancer: A large population-based study (UGIB-GC trial)

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Significant number of gastric cancer patients presented with bleeding.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify risk factors and overall survival rates of bleeding gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2007-2022 at tertiary care center in Thailand. Clinical information, endoscopic findings and histological type were extensively reviewed and were compared between bleeders and non-bleeders. Patients were monitored for at least 5 years.

RESULTS

There were 20,981 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during study period. Total of 201 gastric cancer patients were included in this study, 21 were excluded due to incomplete medical records. 180 gastric cancer patients were included with mean age of 60.5±14.3 years. There were 65 (36.1%) patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Hypertension and chronic kidney disease were significantly more common in bleeders than non-bleeders (43.1% vs 23.5%, OR2.51, 95%CI 1.14.-5.52, p = 0.022; and 16.9% vs 5.2%, OR2.00, 95%CI 1.56-6.63, p = 0.025, respectively). current H. pylori infection was also significantly more common in bleeders than non-bleeders (84.6% vs. 55.7%, OR 4.39, 95%CI 1.90-10.12, p<0.001). Median overall survival of bleeders was significantly lower than non-bleeders (7±0.93 vs 10±2.10 months, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding gastric cancer was not an uncommon condition. Majority of patients presented at advanced stage with grave prognosis. Male gender, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and current H. pylori infection were reliable predictors for bleeding. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are the key to improve clinical outcome.

Hemostatic Powder vs Standard Endoscopic Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor Bleeding: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Current guidelines vary as to their recommendations addressing the role of hemostatic powders when managing patients with malignant gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding because these are based on very-low- to low-quality evidence, in large part due to a paucity of randomized trial data.

METHODS

This was a patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Patients presenting with active bleeding from an upper or lower GI lesion suspected to be malignant at index endoscopy between June 2019 and January 2022 were randomly allocated to receive either TC-325 alone or standard endoscopic treatment (SET). The primary outcome was 30-day rebleeding, and secondary objectives included immediate hemostasis and other clinically relevant endpoints.

RESULTS

Overall, 106 patients made up the study population (55 TC-325 and 51 SET, after 1 exclusion in the TC-325 group and 5 in the SET group). Baseline characteristics and endoscopic findings did not differ between the groups. Thirty-day rebleeding was significantly lower in the TC-325 (2.1% TC-325 vs 21.3% SET; odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.80; P = .003). Immediate hemostasis rates were 100% in the TC-325 group vs 68.6% in the SET group (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.93-2.29; P < .001). Other secondary outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups. Independent predictors of 6-month survival included the Charlson comorbidity index (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32; P = .007) and receiving an additional nonendoscopic hemostatic or oncologic treatment during 30 days after the index endoscopy (hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06-0.43; P < .001) after adjustment for functional status, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and an upper GI source of bleeding.

CONCLUSION

The TC-325 hemostatic powder results in greater immediate hemostasis rates followed by lower 30-day rebleeding rates when compared to contemporary SET. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03855904).

Efficacy of endoscopic therapy and long-term outcomes of upper gastrointestinal tumor bleeding in patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from malignancies is associated with a poor outcome. Only a small number of studies on gastrointestinal tumor bleeding have been published so far, focusing mainly on bleeding from gastric cancer. Since the information on patients with UGIB from esophageal cancer appears insufficient, this study aimed to present clinical and endoscopic findings, treatment options as well as clinical outcomes such as rebleeding and survival of those patients.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included all patients admitted with UGIB from esophageal cancer at our university hospital during a 10-year period.

RESULTS

45 patients were analyzed of whom 26 (57.8%) already had cancer stage IV at index bleeding. 22 (48.9%) patients presented with hemodynamic instability and 30 (66.7%) patients received blood transfusions. Active bleeding was present in 24 (53.3%) patients, of whom 20 (83.3%) received endoscopic therapy. Successful hemostasis was achieved in 18 (90%) of 20 patients with Argon plasma coagulation used most frequently (52.4%). Early and delayed rebleeding occurred in 5 (12.5%) and 11 (27.5%) of all inoperable patients, respectively. Intake of anticoagulation or anti-platelet drugs were risk factors for delayed rebleeding and the median overall survival after index bleeding was 1.2 months.

CONCLUSION

UGIB from esophageal cancer occurred most frequently in advanced tumor stages and was associated with significant blood loss. Even though initial endoscopic therapy was effective, rebleeding occurred in a significant number of patients. Those taking anticoagulants or anti-platelet drugs should be closely monitored for rebleeding. The overall survival after index bleeding was poor.

Use of Endoscopic Suturing for the Treatment of Malignant Gastric Ulcer-Related Hemorrhage

Gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to malignancy can be difficult to manage with traditional endoscopic therapies. Endoscopic suturing is a relatively new technology with limited data available regarding its use for bleeding related to peptic ulcer disease. We describe a case where endoscopic suturing was successfully used to control gastrointestinal hemorrhage from a previously known malignant ulceration that was refractory to traditional interventions.

Hemostatic spray (TC-325) vs. standard endoscopic therapy for non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background and study aims  Hemospray (TC-325) is a mineral powder with adsorptive properties designed for use in various gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) scenarios. We conducted a systematic review & meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TC-325 to standard endoscopic therapy (SET) for non-variceal GIB (NVGIB).

Methods  Multiple databases were searched through October 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to determine pooled relative risk (RR) and proportions with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for primary hemostasis, hemostasis failure, 30-day rebleeding, length of stay (LOS), and need for rescue interventions. Heterogeneity was assessed using I ² %.

Results  Five RCTs with 362 patients (TC-325 178, SET 184) – 123 females and 239 males with a mean age 65 ± 16 years). The most common etiologies were peptic ulcer disease (48 %), malignancies (35 %), and others (17 %). Bleeding was characterized as Forrest IA (7 %), IB (73 %), IIA (3 %), and IIB (1 %). SET included epinephrine injection, electrocautery, hemoclips, or a combination. No statistical difference in primary hemostasis between TC-325 compared to SET, RR 1.09 (CI 0.95–1.25; I ² 43), P =  0.2, including patients with oozing/spurting hemorrhage, RR 1.13 (CI 0.98–1.3; I ² 35), P =  0.08. Failure to achieve hemostasis was higher in SET compared to TC-325, RR 0.30 (CI 0.12–0.77, I ² 0), P =  0.01, including patients with oozing/spurting hemorrhage, RR 0.24 (CI 0.09 – 0.63, I ² 0), P =  0.004. We found no difference between the two interventions in terms of rebleeding, RR 1.13 (CI 0.62–2.07, I ² 26), P =  0.8 and LOS, standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.27 (CI, –0.20–0.74; I ² 62), P =  0.3. Finally, pooled rate of rescue interventions (angiography) was statistically higher in SET compared to TC-325, RR 0.68 (CI 0.5–0.94; I ² 0), P =  0.02.

Conclusions  Our analysis shows that for acute NV GIB, including oozing/spurting hemorrhage, TC-325 does not result in higher rates of primary hemostasis compared to SET. However, lower rates of failures were seen with TC-325 than SET. In addition, there was no difference in the two modalities when comparing rates of rebleeding and LOS.

Efficacy of topical hemostatic agents in malignancy-related GI bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite advances in endoscopic therapies, malignancy-related GI bleeding remains difficult to manage with high rates of treatment failure and rebleeding. Topical hemostatic agents (THAs) are easier to apply to the wide bleeding surface of tumors. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of THAs in malignancy-related GI bleeding.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases to identify studies reporting on the use of THAs in malignancy-related GI bleeding. The primary outcome was the achievement of hemostasis; secondary outcomes were early rebleeding (≤3 days), delayed rebleeding (>3 days), aggregate rebleeding, all-cause mortality, and GI bleeding-related mortality. A meta-analysis of proportions was done for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 355 citations, 16 studies with 530 patients were included. Primary hemostasis was achieved in 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.5-96.0). Early rebleeding was seen in 13.9% (95% CI, 9.7-19.4) and delayed rebleeding in 11.4% (95% CI, 5.8-21.1). Aggregate rebleeding was seen in 24.2% (95% CI, 18.5-31.0). All-cause mortality was 33.1% (95% CI, 23.7-44.0), whereas GI bleeding-related mortality occurred in 5.9% (95% CI, 2.2%-14.8).

CONCLUSIONS

THAs are highly effective for achieving primary hemostasis in malignancy-related GI bleeding. It should be considered as an alternative to traditional endotherapy methods in malignancy-related GI bleeding. Future studies should be designed to evaluate its efficacy and safety as a primary method of hemostasis as compared with traditional endotherapy measures.

Transcatheter arterial embolization for cancer-related non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A multicenter retrospective study of 107 patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcome of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in the treatment of cancer-related non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred and seven patients who underwent TAE for the treatment of cancer-related non-variceal UGIB at five institutions between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively included. There were 78 men and 29 women, with a mean age of 60.6 ± 13.2 (SD) (age range: 31-87 years). Clinical success was defined as no rebleeding within 30 days after TAE. Rebleeding was defined as non-variceal UGIB resulting in a decrease in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL within 24 h. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate actuarial probabilities of rebleeding and survival within 30 days after TAE. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify variables associated with clinical success and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 106 out of 107 patients (99.1%). Positive angiographic findings (contrast extravasation and pseudoaneurysm) were observed in 30/107 patients (28.0%). Empiric embolization was performed in 77/107 patients (72.0%). Clinical success was achieved in 60/107 patients (56.1%). The 3-day, 7-day, and 30-day actuarial probabilities of rebleeding were 21.5%, 31.0%, and 44.6%, respectively. No variables were identified as predictors of clinical success. Nineteen patients (19/107; 17.8%) died within 30 days after TAE; of them, 14 (14/107; 13.1%) died due to bleeding-related causes. The 3-day, 7-day, and 30-day actuarial probabilities of survival were 91.6%, 88.8%, and 77.4%, respectively. A baseline hemoglobin level of ≤ 60 g/L (Odds ratio [OR]: 3.376; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.223-9.318; P = 0.019) and clinical failure (OR: 6.149; 95% CI: 2.113-17.893; P = 0.001) were identified as predictors of 30-day mortality. Major complications (gastrointestinal perforation) occurred in one patient (1/107; 0.9%). Minor complications (abdominal pain, fever, and vomiting) occurred in 19 patients (19/107; 17.8%).

CONCLUSION

TAE is a safe treatment option for patients with cancer-related non-variceal UGIB, and seems to be effective in more than half of these patients.

Hemostatic Powders in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: The Open Questions

Hemostatic powder (HP) is a relatively recent addition to the arsenal of hemostatic endoscopic procedures (HEPs) for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) due to benign and malignant lesions. Five types of HP are currently available: TC-325 (Hemospray™), EndoClot™, Ankaferd Blood Stopper^®, and, more recently, UI-EWD (Nexpowder^TM) and CEGP-003 (CGBio™). HP acts as a mechanical barrier and/or promotes platelet activation and coagulation cascade. HP may be used in combination with or as rescue therapy in case of failure of conventional HEPs (CHEPs) and also as monotherapy in large, poorly accessible lesions with multiple bleeding sources. Although the literature on HP is abundant, randomized controlled trials are scant, and some questions remain open. While HP is highly effective in inducing immediate hemostasis in GIB, the rates of rebleeding reported in different studies are very variable, and conditions affecting the stability of hemostasis have not yet been fully elucidated. It is not established whether HP as monotherapy is appropriate in severe GIB, such as spurting peptic ulcers, or should be used only as rescue or adjunctive therapy. Finally, as it can be sprayed on large areas, HP could become the gold standard in malignancy-related GIB, which is often nonresponsive or not amenable to treatment with CHEPs as a result of multiple bleeding points and friable surfaces. This is a narrative review that provides an overview of currently available data and the open questions regarding the use of HP in the management of non-variceal upper GIB due to benign and malignant diseases.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for 30-day mortality in esophageal cancer patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study

Background

Esophageal cancer is a highly malignant neoplasm with poor prognosis. Of its patients, upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is one of the most challenging and threatening conditions in the emergency department (ED). However, no previous studies have analyzed the etiologies and clinical outcomes in this specific population. This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and risk factors for 30-day mortality in esophageal cancer patients with UGIB.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 249 adult patients with esophageal cancer presenting with UGIB in the ED. Patients was divided into the survivor and non-survivor groups, and their demographic information, medical history, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and clinical findings were recorded. The factors associated with 30-day mortality were identified using Cox's proportional hazard model.

Results

Among the 249 patients in this study, 30-day mortality occurred in 47 patients (18.9%). The most common causes of UGIB were tumor ulcer (53.8%), followed by gastric/duodenal ulcer (14.5%), and arterial-esophageal fistula (AEF) (12.0%). Multivariate analyses indicated that underweight (HR = 2.02, p = 0.044), history of chronic kidney disease (HR = 6.39, p < 0.001), active bleeding (HR = 2.24, p = 0.039), AEF (HR = 2.23, p = 0.046), and metastatic lymph nodes (HR = 2.99, p = 0.021) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality.

Conclusions

The most common cause of UGIB in esophageal cancer patients was tumor ulcer. AEF, accounting for 12% of UGIB in our study, is not an uncommon cause. Underweight, underlying chronic kidney disease, active bleeding, AEF, and tumor N stage > 0 were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality.

International consensus on the initial diagnostic workup of cancer of unknown primary

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) is estimated to be 1-2 % of all cancers worldwide, no international standards for diagnostic workup are yet established. Such an international guideline would facilitate international comparison, provide adequate incidence and survival rates, and ultimately improve care of patients with CUP.

METHODS

Participants for a four round modified Delphi study were selected via a CUP literature search in PubMed and an international network of cancer researchers. A total of 90 CUP experts were invited, and 34 experts from 15 countries over four continents completed all Delphi survey rounds.

FINDINGS

The Delphi procedure resulted in a multi-layer CUP classification for the diagnostic workup. Initial diagnostic workup should at least consist of history and physical examination, full blood count, analysis of serum markers, a biopsy of the most accessible lesion, a CT scan of chest/abdomen/pelvis, and immunohistochemical testing. Additionally, the expert panel agreed on the need of an ideal diagnostic lead time for CUP patients. There was no full consensus on the place in diagnostic workup of symptom-guided MRI or ultrasound, a PET/CT scan, targeted gene panels, immunohistochemical markers, and whole genome sequencing.

INTERPRETATION

Consensus was reached on the contents of the first diagnostic layer of a multi-layer CUP classification. This is a first step towards full consensus on CUP diagnostics, that should also include supplementary and advanced diagnostics.

A prospective, open-labeled, and randomized trial for assessing safety and clinical utility of gastric biopsies during emergency gastroscopy for patients with bleeding gastric ulcers

OBJECTIVE

There is no consensus on whether a gastroscopic biopsy is necessary during the emergency treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases such as gastric ulcer bleeding. In this study, we examined the clinical utility and safety of an emergency gastroscopic biopsy for the assessment of gastric ulcer bleeding.

METHODS

We enrolled 150 patients with a single bleeding gastric ulcer after emergency gastroscopy (EG) from April 2020 to April 2022. The patients were randomly divided into the biopsy and no biopsy groups, and they were followed-up until June 2022 to examine whether recurrent gastric ulcer bleeding had occurred.

RESULTS

Re-bleeding occurred in 15 out of 150 (10%) patients. We diagnosed malignancies in 17 (11.3%) patients and validated 14 (9.3%) of them during the initial gastroscopy procedure. Factors that could predict the occurrence of gastric ulcer re-bleeding with biopsy during EG included an absence of ischemic heart disease (odds ratio [OR] = 0.395, confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.65, p ≤ .005), renal disease (OR = 1.74, CI: 0.77-1.59, p ≤ .005), and using warfarin or oral anticoagulants (OR = 11.953, CI: 3.494-39.460, p ≤ .005). No significant differences were observed in 60-day bleeding (p = .077) and the duration of hospitalization (p = .700) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing biopsy during EG did not exhibit an increased risk of re-bleeding compared with those who did not undergo a biopsy. An early biopsy facilitates an early pathologic diagnosis, early clinical intervention, safe discharge of low-risk patients, and improved outcomes in high-risk patients.

Endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding caused by malignancy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding secondary to malignancy can be challenging. Endoscopy is the gold standard to diagnose and treat gastrointestinal bleeding but clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with malignancy-related bleeding are not well understood. This study aims to look at clinical characteristics, endoscopic findings, safety and clinical outcomes of endoscopic interventions for GI malignancy-related bleeding.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of patients with confirmed GI malignancies who underwent endoscopy for GI bleeding at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2010 and 2019. Cox hazard analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

A total of 313 patients were included, with median age of 59 years; 74.8% were male. The stomach (30.0%) was the most common tumor location. Active bleeding was evident endoscopically in 47.3% of patients. Most patients (77.3%) did not receive endoscopic treatment. Of the patients who received endoscopic treatment, 57.7% had hemostasis. No endoscopy-related adverse events were recorded. Endoscopic treatment was associated with hemostasis (P < 0.001), but not decreased recurrent bleeding or mortality. Absence of active bleeding on endoscopy, stable hemodynamic status at presentation, lower cancer stage, and surgical intervention were associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that endoscopy is a safe diagnostic tool in this patient population; while endoscopic treatments may help achieve hemostasis, it may not decrease the risk of recurrent bleeding or improve survival.

[Gastric cancer complicated by bleeding. (A systematic review)]

Bleeding as the most common complication of gastric cancer is a significant problem of modern surgery. Both oncologists and surgeons in ordinary hospitals deal with this adverse event. In addition to the well-known drugs for hemostasis, there are also generally recognized traditional methods of endoscopic hemostasis and transcatheter angiographic embolization. Surgical interventions do not lose their role too if previous hemostatic methods turned out to be ineffective. The reports devoted to radiotherapy for treatment and prevention of gastric bleeding following malignant process have been recently published. Such a wide choice of hemostatic methods prompted us to analyze the most significant recent studies regarding effectiveness of various methods and choice of the most optimal one.

A Case of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Due to Metastatic High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma Successfully Treated With Chemotherapy

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common and potentially life-threatening condition. Metastatic disease is an exceedingly rare cause of UGIB. We report the case of a 73-year-old man with high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) who presented for the initiation of chemotherapy and was found to be acutely anemic due to UGIB. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed multiple large, discrete, ulcerated, non-circumferential, and friable masses in the stomach. Biopsies were consistent with HGBL. The patient was urgently initiated on chemotherapy with the resolution of lesions on subsequent EGD. The rate of prevalence of gastric metastases is unknown, but it should be considered in patients with active malignancy who present with signs of UGIB.

Treatment response after palliative radiotherapy for bleeding gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective observational study (JROSG 17-3)

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy seems to be rarely performed for incurable gastric cancer. In this first multicenter study, we examined the effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy and investigated whether biologically effective dose (BED) is associated with survival, response, or re-bleeding.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included blood transfusion or hemoglobin levels < 8.0 g/dL. The primary endpoint was the intention-to-treat (ITT) bleeding response rate at 4 weeks. Response entailed all of the following criteria: (i) hemoglobin levels ≥ 8.0 g/dL; (ii) 7 consecutive days without blood transfusion anytime between enrollment and blood sampling; and (iii) no salvage treatment (surgery, endoscopic treatment, transcatheter embolization, or re-irradiation) for bleeding gastric cancer. Re-bleeding was defined as the need for blood transfusion or salvage treatment.

RESULTS

We enrolled 55 patients from 15 institutions. The ITT response rates were 47%, 53%, and 49% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively. The per-protocol response rates were 56%, 78%, and 90% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively. Neither response nor BED (α/β = 10) predicted overall survival. Multivariable Fine-Gray model showed that BED was not a significant predictor of response. Univariable Cox model showed that BED was not significantly associated with re-bleeding. Grades 1, 2, 3, and, ≥ 4 radiation-related adverse events were reported in 11, 9, 1, and 0 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The per-protocol response rate increased to 90% during the 8-week follow-up. The frequent occurrence of death starting shortly after enrollment lowered the ITT response rate. BED was not associated with survival, bleeding response, or re-bleeding.

Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with localized gastric cancer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on the management of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

Dilemma in selection of treatment for preoperative anemia in patients with gastric cancer

One of the common comorbidities of patients with gastric cancer waiting for gastrectomy is anemia, which negatively affects the postoperative outcomes and prognosis. Therefore, preoperative anemia often needs to be corrected. The most commonly used strategy to treat preoperative anemia in gastric cancer is transfusion. Currently, a large amount of evidence shows that transfusion can increase the incidence of postoperative complications and affect the long-term survival of patients. Therefore, there is a dilemma in choosing the treatment for preoperative anemia in patients with gastric cancer. Surgeons need to fully understand the duality of therapy strategies for preoperative anemia in gastric cancer patients. In this study, we review the studies on preoperative anemia and its treatment in patients with gastric cancer, aiming to help clinicians manage patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer better.

[Gastric cancer complicated by bleeding: a systematic review]

Bleeding as the most common complication of gastric cancer is a significant problem of modern surgery. Both oncologists and surgeons in ordinary hospitals deal with this adverse event. In addition to the well-known drugs for hemostasis, there are also generally recognized traditional methods of endoscopic hemostasis and transcatheter angiographic embolization. Surgical interventions do not lose their role too if previous hemostatic methods turned out to be ineffective. The reports devoted to radiotherapy for treatment and prevention of gastric bleeding following malignant process have been recently published. Such a wide choice of hemostatic methods prompted us to analyze the most significant recent studies regarding effectiveness of various methods and choice of the most optimal one.

The Current Portrayal of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in a Portuguese Tertiary Center

Introduction

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is an important healthcare problem whose epidemiology and outcomes have been changing throughout the years. The main goal of this study was to characterize the current demographics, etiologies, and risk factors of NVUGIB.

Methods

Analysis of clinical, endoscopic, and outcome data from patients who were admitted for NVUGIB between January 2016 and January 2019 in an emergency department of a tertiary hospital center.

Results

A total of 522 patients were included, with a median age of 71 years, mainly men, with multiple comorbidities. Most patients were directly admitted, while the others were transferred from other hospitals. Peptic ulcer disease was the most common cause of NVUGIB and it was followed by tumor bleeding. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed within <12 h after hospital admission in 51.9%. In-hospital rebleeding occurred in 6.9% and overall mortality was 4.2%. Transferred patients had superior Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), required more blood transfusion, endoscopic and surgical interventions, and presented higher rebleeding rate, with similar mortality. Complete Rockall score (CRS) and GBS were predictors of endoscopic therapy. Surgery need was only related to CRS. Patients who rebled had superior pre-endoscopic Rockall score (RS), CRS, and GBS. Mortality was increased in patients with higher RS and CRS.

Discussion/Conclusion

Ageing and increasing comorbidities have not been related to worse outcomes in NVUGIB. These findings seem to be the consequence of the correct use of both diagnostic and therapeutic tools in an organized and widely accessible healthcare system.

Gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the setting of gastrointestinal cancer: Anatomical prevalence, predictors, and interventions

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) is a common complication with gastrointestinal cancers (GIC). There is no comprehensive research that examines GIH in different types of GIC.

AIM

To study the prevalence, predictors, and interventions of GIH based on the anatomical location of GIC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of the 2016-2018 National Inpatient Sample database, the largest inpatient care database in the United States. All adult inpatients (≥ 18-year-old) were included. ICD-10-CM codes were used to identify patients with GIH and GIC. Prevalence of GIH was obtained based on the anatomical location of GIC. Predictors of GIH in the GIC population were studied using multivariate analysis. Interventions including endoscopy were compared to the non-intervention group to determine the differences in inpatient mortality.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 18173885 inpatients, 321622 (1.77%) cases had a diagnosis of GIC. Within GIC patients, 30507 (9.5%) inpatients had GIH, which was significantly (P < 0.001) more than the prevalence of GIH in patients without GIC (3.4%). The highest to lowest GIH rates are listed in the following order: Stomach cancer (15.7%), liver cancer (13.0%), small bowel cancer (12.7%), esophageal cancer (9.1%), colorectal cancer (9.1%), pancreatic cancer (7.2%), bile duct cancer (6.0%), and gallbladder cancer (5.1%). Within gastric cancer, the GIH rate ranged from 14.8% in cardia cancer to 25.5% in fundus cancer. Within small bowel cancers, duodenal cancers had a higher GIH rate (15.6%) than jejunal (11.1%) and ileal cancers (5.7%). Within esophageal cancers, lower third cancers had higher GIH (10.7%) than the middle third (8.0%) or upper third cancers (6.2%). When studying the predictors of GIH in GIC, socioeconomic factors such as minority race and less favorable insurances (Medicaid and self-pay) were associated with significantly higher GIH on multivariate analysis (P < 0.01). Chemotherapy and immunotherapy were also identified to have a lower risk for GIH [odds ratios (OR) = 0.74 (0.72-0.77), P < 0.001]. Out of 30507 GIC inpatients who also had GIH, 16267 (53.3%) underwent an endoscopic procedure, i.e., upper endoscopy or colonoscopy. Inpatient mortality was significantly lower in patients who underwent endoscopy compared to no endoscopy [5.5% vs 14.9%, OR = 0.42 (0.38-0.46), P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of GIH in patients with GIC varies significantly based on the tumor’s anatomical location. Endoscopy, which appears to be associated with a substantial reduction in inpatient mortality, should be offered to GIC patients with GIH. Nevertheless, the decision on intervention in the GIC population should be tailored to individual patient's goals of care, the benefit on overall care, and long-term survival.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding as the initial manifestation of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

A 78-year-old man presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which was biopsy proven to be from a gastric neuroendocrine tumor. By the time of diagnosis, he developed liver metastasis and died 2 months later. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is an uncommon feature in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Efficacy of radiotherapy for gastric bleeding associated with advanced gastric cancer

Background

Gastric bleeding negatively impacts the quality of life of patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer and is frequently lethal. We investigated the efficacy of RT for palliation of gastric bleeding from gastric cancer and identified an optimal radiotherapy (RT) strategy.

Methods

The study analyzed 57 patients submitted to palliative RT for gastric bleeding associated with gastric cancer between January 2009 and February 2019. Changes in hemoglobin (Hb) levels were analyzed based on measurements taken before and immediately, 1 month, and 2 months after RT. Re-bleeding after RT was identified as either Hb level dropping to < 7.0 g/dL or the administration of a blood transfusion after RT.

Results

The median biologically effective dose (α/β = 10) was 37.5 Gy (range 23.6–58.5). The most common regimen was 25 Gy in five fractions. The mean Hb levels before, immediately after, 1 month, and 2 months after RT (6.6, 9.7, 10.3, and 9.7 g/dL, respectively) were significantly higher than that before RT (all p < 0.001). No significant differences in re-bleeding rates were observed according to total dose, fractional dose, and fraction number. Gastric tumor response evaluated by computed tomography within 2 months after RT showed partial responses were more frequent in patients achieving bleeding control (25.0% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.023) and overall survival was significantly improved for bleeding control within 3 months after RT (median, 15.4 vs. 10.0 weeks, p = 0.048).

Conclusions

RT was an effective modality for gastric bleeding control in gastric cancer, which can be achieved with a short course scheme with five fractions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01884-5.

Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have reported whether a biopsy in emergency gastroscopy (EG) increased the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer (SMGU). This study aims to conduct a multicenter retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching to verify whether a biopsy in EG increases the risk of rebleeding in patients diagnosed with Forrest I ANVUGIB combined with SMGU.

METHODS

Using the data for propensity-matched patients, logistic regression models were fitted using rebleeding as the dependent variable. Survival time was defined as the length of time the patient experienced from visiting the emergency department to rebleeding. We used the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method to analyze the 30-day survival of the patients with and without a biopsy after matching, and the log-rank test was performed to examine the differences in survival.

RESULTS

With the use of propensity score matching, 308 patients who underwent a biopsy in EG were matched with 308 patients who did not. In the five logistic regression models, there were no significant group differences in the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I ANVUGIB combined with SMGU between the biopsy and no-biopsy groups. The probability of survival was not significantly different between the no-biopsy and biopsy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter, retrospective propensity score matching cohort study, compared with patients without a biopsy, patients with a biopsy during EG had no increased risk of rebleeding, and there was no significant difference in the rate of rebleeding.

Role of palliative radiotherapy in bleeding control in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer

Background

This study analyzed the clinical results of palliative radiotherapy for bleeding control in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who met the following inclusion criteria between January 2002 and June 2018: histologically proven gastric cancer, gastric tumor bleeding confirmed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and palliative radiotherapy performed for hemostasis. The median radiotherapy dose was 30 Gy, with a daily dose ranging from 1.8 to 3 Gy.

Results

Sixty-one patients were included in this analysis. The study population was predominantly male (72.1%), with a median age of 62 years (range: 32–92). The median baseline hemoglobin level was 7.1 g/dL, and the most common presenting symptom of gastric tumor bleeding was melena (85.2%). Bleeding control was achieved in 54 (88.5%) patients. The median levels of hemoglobin at 1, 2, and 3 months after completion of radiotherapy were 10.1 g/dL, 10.2 g/dL, and 10.4 g/dL, respectively; these values were significantly different from that before radiotherapy (7.1 g/dL; p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 4.8 months. Among the 54 patients who achieved bleeding control after radiotherapy, 19 (35.2%) experienced re-bleeding during the follow-up period. The median time to re-bleeding was 6.0 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a higher radiation dose (p = 0.007) and additional chemotherapy after radiotherapy (p = 0.004) were significant factors for prolonging the time to re-bleeding.

Conclusions

Tumor bleeding was adequately controlled by radiotherapy in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer.

Efficacy of a novel hemostatic adhesive powder in patients with upper gastrointestinal tumor bleeding

Background

Gastrointestinal tumor bleeding remains a clinical challenge because it is difficult to treat with conventional endoscopic hemostatic options. Recently, an endoscopic hemostatic powder (UI-EWD) was developed and reported to provide effective control of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of current study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of this novel hemostatic powder in tumor bleeding.

Methods

A total of 41 consecutive patients with upper gastrointestinal tumor bleeding were included. UI-EWD was applied in all patients as an auxiliary hemostatic method as a salvage therapy or monotherapy during endoscopic treatment. Hemostasis success rates, adverse event related to UI-EWD, and rates of re-bleeding were evaluated.

Results

In all cases, UI-EWD application was successful at tumor bleeding sites. Immediate hemostasis occurred in 40/41 (97.5%) patients, and re-bleeding within 28 days occurred in 10 of 40 (22.5%) patients that achieved initial hemostasis. The success rate of immediate hemostasis for UI-EWD monotherapy was 100% (23/23). The re-bleeding rate at 28 days after UI-EWD monotherapy was 26.1% (6/23). No adverse events associated with UI-EWD application were encountered.

Conclusions

The success rate of UI-EWD for immediate hemostasis in cases of GI tumor bleeding was excellent and UI-EWD produced promising results with respect to the prevention of re-bleeding. Based on these results, we suggest that UI-EWD be considered an effective salvage therapy or even monotherapy for GI tumor bleeding.

Novel upper gastrointestinal monitoring system to track upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A pilot study

Background and study aims  Early detection of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) rebleeding is not easy by observing clinical symptoms. We developed a novel UGI monitoring system and aimed to test its feasibility of continuous tracking of UGI bleeding. Patients and methods  A prospective study was conducted on patients with moderate to high risk of rebleeding. The UGI monitoring system was installed to monitor their gastric contents. It would alarm if rebleeding was suspected and the physician could review the images to make a further decision. The patient's comfort level was also evaluated. Results  Sixteen patients were enrolled. Rebleeding occurred in one patient and was detected by this system more than 5 hours earlier than with clinical symptoms. The interobserver reliability for reviewing the images to define the blood clearance in the stomach was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.79-0.96). The comfort level assessed by patients was 1.90 ± 1.39 (on the scale of 0-5). Conclusions  This pilot study demonstrated the potential of this UGI monitoring system for early detection of rebleeding.

Efficacy of Chronomodulated Chemotherapy for Palliation of Hematemesis in Inoperable Gastric Cancer: A Single-Institutional Retrospective Study

Context:

Aside abdominal discomfort and pain, upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) significantly disgraces the quality of life (QoL), especially in inoperable gastric cancer patients. Although, in early stages, it is infrequent and often ignored, but in advanced stages, its aggressiveness often deteriorates patient's hemoglobin (Hb) level and performing status.

Aim:

The aim of this study is to correlate the change in (1) the frequency of episodes of UGIB, (2) its severity in terms of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade for UGIB, and (3) Hb level with the successful completion of successive cycles of palliative chemotherapy where it becomes invariably the only modality to palliate the cancer disease.

Setting and Design:

This single-institutional retrospective observational study included seventy gastric carcinoma patients with a chief complaint of frequent hematemesis. They were divided according to the cause behind inoperability or irresectability: (1) Metastatic disease, (2) locally advanced irresectable disease, (3) uncontrolled comorbidities, (4) poor GC (PGC), and (5) refused to give surgical consent.

Subjects and Methods:

Following baseline evaluation and prechemotherapy workups, patients were subjected to three-weekly chronomodulated modified EOX regimen. Relevant parameters, i.e., (1) average episodes per-week (AEP) score, (2) Hb, and (3) average CTCAE grade value for UGIB were recorded after every cycle.

Results:

At 12-week follow-up, there was a significant decrease in mean AEP score from baseline (from 2.6691 ± 0.7047 to 1.5033 ± 0.6272) for the entire cohort (P < 0.001). Maximum benefit in terms of mean Hb (increase by 1.0737% above baseline) took place for PGC group (P < 0.001). Mean CTCAE grade value for the entire cohort decreased from baseline by 0.6428, which was statistically significant with a P < 0.001.

Conclusions:

PGC group was maximally benefited considering all three parameters. Though surgery defines the mainstay of treatment for gastric carcinoma, yet in inoperable cases, only chronomodulated chemotherapy significantly affects the severity of UGIB and thus may improve QoL.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with pancreatic cancer: Causes and haemostatic treatments

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a rare but severe complication of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the causes and treatments of non-postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and explore the parameters associated with therapeutic effectiveness.

METHODS

This was a single-centre observational retrospective study (2000-2017) with data collected from the prospectively coded diagnostic hospital's database system including patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had a gastrointestinal bleeding episode. Effectiveness of haemostatic treatment was assessed according to transfusion requirements and immediate and long-term haemostatic efficacy; the latter defined as no bleeding recurrence.

RESULTS

The population included 72 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had 94 episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding. The main causes of gastrointestinal bleeding were gastroduodenal tumour invasion (56.4%) and oesophageal variceal bleeding due to left-sided portal hypertension (19.1%). In cases of gastrointestinal bleeding caused by tumour invasion, the main treatment was therapeutic endoscopy (41.5%). Among patients who had gastrointestinal bleeding by tumour invasion treated by endoscopy or radiation therapy, haemostatic immediate efficacy rates were 70.6% and 100%, respectively. Bleeding recurrence rates were 35.3% and 25.0%, for patients treated by endoscopy or radiation therapy, respectively, for a first episode of gastrointestinal bleeding by tumour invasion. Transfusion requirements, before and after treatment, were not different in patients treated by haemostatic radiation therapy for gastrointestinal bleeding by tumour invasion compared to other treatments (odds ratio 0.3, 95% CI (0.06-1.59); p = 0.16). The median survival after all-cause gastrointestinal bleeding was 2.72 months (1.43-4.01).

CONCLUSION

Gastroduodenal tumour invasion was the main cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; haemostatic radiation therapy is a potential interesting option for gastrointestinal bleeding treatment in this context.

Clinical outcomes of tumor bleeding in duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a 20-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, and reports on duodenal GIST bleeding are few. We analyzed the risk factors and clinical outcomes of hemorrhagic duodenal GISTs and compared them with those of gastric GISTs.

METHODS

Primary duodenal GISTs surgically diagnosed between January 1998 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Furthermore, patients with duodenal GIST were compared with those with primary gastric GIST histopathologically diagnosed between January 1998 and May 2015 using previously published data.

RESULTS

Of the 170 total patients with duodenal GISTs, 48 (28.2%) exhibited tumor bleeding. Endoscopic intervention, embolization, and non-interventional conservative treatment were performed for initial hemostasis in 17, 1, and 30 patients, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 81.9% in the bleeding group and 89.4% in the non-bleeding group (P = 0.495). Multivariate analysis showed that p53 positivity was a significant risk factor for duodenal GIST bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 2.781, P = 0.012), and age ≥ 60 years (HR 3.163, P = 0.027), a large maximum diameter (comparing four groups: < 2, 2-5, 5-10, and ≥ 10 cm), and mitotic count ≥ 5/high-power field (HPF) (HR 3.265, P = 0.032) were risk factors for overall survival. The incidence of bleeding was significantly higher in duodenal GISTs than in gastric GISTs (28.2% vs. 6.6%, P < 0.001), and the re-bleeding rate after endoscopic hemostasis was also higher in duodenal GISTs than in gastric GISTs (41.2% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.118).

CONCLUSION

In patients with duodenal GIST with old age, large tumor diameter, and mitotic count ≥ 5/HPF, a treatment plan should be established in consideration of the poor prognosis, although tumor bleeding does not adversely affect the prognosis. Duodenal GISTs have a higher incidence of tumor bleeding and re-bleeding rate after endoscopic hemostasis than gastric GISTs.

TC-325 hemostatic powder versus current standard of care in managing malignant GI bleeding: a pilot randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

TC-325 (Hemospray; Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, NC, USA), an endoscopic hemostatic powder, exhibits possible benefits in patients with malignant GI bleeding. Our aim is to assess feasibility and determine estimates of efficacy of TC-325 compared with standard of care (SOC) in terms of initial hemostasis and recurrent bleeding rates in comparable groups of patients with malignant GI bleeding.

METHODS

Adult patients presenting with acute malignant upper or lower GI bleeding were randomized to TC-325 or SOC. Measured outcomes included feasibility of recruitment and randomization in the urgent care setting, immediate hemostasis, recurrent bleeding, need for additional treatment modalities, and mortality.

RESULTS

A preplanned 20 patients (upper GI source in 85%) were randomized 1:1 to TC-325 or SOC (25% women, age 67.2 ± 15.9 years, oozing in 95%) over 20 months. Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 90% of patients treated initially with TC-325 versus 40% in the SOC group (P = .057). Overall, 83.3% crossed over to TC-325, with hemostasis then achieved at index endoscopy in 80%. Overall, hemostasis at index endoscopy (before or after crossover) was obtained in 87.7% of patients treated with TC-325. Recurrent bleeding over the next 180 days was 20% in the TC-325 group compared with 60% in the SOC group (P = .170).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot trial demonstrates the feasibility of TC-325 in malignant GI bleeding and provides results to help inform a larger randomized trial. Although not powered for such, results suggest that use of TC-325 is a very promising modality in malignant GI bleeding in achieving immediate hemostasis and may even result in decreased subsequent recurrent bleeding. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02135627.).

Hemostatic spray powder TC-325 for GI bleeding in a nationwide study: survival and predictors of failure via competing risks analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

TC-325 (Hemospray, Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, NC) is an inorganic hemostatic powder recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness, safety, and predictors of TC-325 failure in a large real-life cohort.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted at 21 Spanish centers. All patients treated with TC-325 until September 2018 were included. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as failed intraprocedural hemostasis or recurrent bleeding within the first 30 postprocedural days. Secondary outcomes included safety and survival. Risk and predictors of failure were assessed via competing-risk models.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 261 patients, of whom 219 (83.9%) presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). The most common causes were peptic ulcer (28%), malignancy (18.4%), and therapeutic endoscopy-related GIB (17.6%). TC-325 was used as rescue therapy in 191 (73.2%) patients. The rate of intraprocedural hemostasis was 93.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%-96%). Risks of TC-325 failure at postprocedural days 3, 7, and 30 were 21.1%, 24.6%, and 27.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, spurting bleeding (P = .004), use of vasoactive drugs (P = .02), and hypotension (P = .008) were independent predictors of failure. Overall 30-day survival was 81.9% (95% CI, 76%-86%) and intraprocedural hemostasis was associated with a better prognosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.29; P = .006). Two severe adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSION

TC-325 was safe and effective for intraprocedural hemostasis in more than 90% of patients, regardless of the cause or site of bleeding and its use as rescue therapy. In this high-risk cohort treated with TC-325, the 30-day failure rate exceeded 25% and was highest with spurting bleeding or hemodynamic instability.

Management of Bleeding from Unresectable Gastric Cancer

Bleeding from unresectable gastric cancer (URGC) is not a rare complication. Two major ways in which the management of this issue differs from the management of benign lesions are the high rate of rebleeding after successful hemostasis and that not only endoscopic therapy (ET) and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) but palliative radiotherapy (PRT) can be applied in the clinical setting. However, there are no specific guidelines concerning the management of URGC with bleeding. We herein discuss strategies for managing bleeding from URGC. A high rate of initial hemostasis for active bleeding is expected when using various ET modalities properly. If ET fails in patients with hemostatic instability, emergent TAE is considered in order to avoid a life-threating condition due to massive bleeding. Early PRT, especially, regimens with a high biologically effective dose (BED) of ≥39 Gy should be considered not only for patients with hemostatic failure but also for those with successful hemostasis and inactive hemorrhage, as longer duration of response with few complications can be expected. Further prospective, comparative studies considering not only the hemostatic efficacy of these modalities but the patients' quality of life are needed in order to establish treatment strategies for bleeding from URGC.

Endoscopic management of bleeding gastrointestinal tumors

Bleeding due to primary or metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) tumors remains clinically challenging. Bleeding is further complicated in the setting of underlying friable neovascularization of tumors and coagulopathy. Endoscopic hemostatic therapeutic options have traditionally involved the use of thermal/mechanical therapy in conjunction with injection therapy. This review looks at the role of endoscopy in managing tumor-related GI bleeding, specifically contact and non-contact thermal therapy, radiofrequency ablation, endoloops, epinephrine and ethanol injection, and, most recently, Hemospray. Overall, current data show that endoscopic therapy is limited, with high rebleeding rates and a failure to improve overall outcomes. Larger clinical trials are needed to determine the efficacy of current techniques and establish therapeutic algorithms, with the goal of achieving primary hemostasis and reducing rebleeding rates.

Clinical outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor

BACKGROUND

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is one of the major manifestations of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the stomach. Several studies have reported that GIST bleeding is associated with poor prognosis. However, only case reports have reported hemostasis modalities for treating hemorrhagic gastric GIST. To identify clinical outcome of gastric GIST bleeding, we analyzed risk factors and prognosis of hemorrhagic GIST evaluating hemostasis methods.

METHODS

Total 697 patients histopathologically diagnosed with primary gastric GIST between January 1998 and May 2015 were enrolled to the study, retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of 697 total patients, 46 (6.6%) patients had UGIB. Endoscopic intervention, transarterial embolization, or surgical intervention was performed for initial hemostasis in 15, 2, and 1, respectively. Over a median of 68 months of follow-up, 16 patients in bleeding group and 88 patients in non-bleeding group died; the 5-year survival rate was 79.4% in bleeding group and 91.8% in non-bleeding group (p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that significant risk factors for gastric GIST bleeding included the maximal tumor diameter > 5 cm and Ki-67 positivity. Age ≥ 60 [hazard ratio (HR) = 8.124, p = 0.048], necrosis (HR = 5.093, p = 0.027), and bleeding (HR 5.743, p = 0.034) were significant factors for overall survival of gastric GIST patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding risk of gastric GIST was higher when tumor had diameter > 5 cm or Ki-67 positivity. In addition, tumor bleeding, necrosis, and age ≥ 60 years were associated with poor overall survival. Endoscopic intervention can be considered as an effective method for initial hemostasis of hemorrhagic gastric GIST.

Comparison of Hemospray® and Endoclot™ for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common indication for endoscopy. For refractory cases, hemostatic powders (HP) represent “touch-free” agents.

AIM

To analyze short term (ST-within 72 h-) and long-term (LT-within 30 d-) success for achieving hemostasis with HP and to directly compare the two agents Hemospray (HS) and Endoclot (EC).

METHODS

HP was applied in 154 consecutive patients (mean age 67 years) with GI bleeding. Patients were followed up for 1 mo (mean follow-up: 3.2 mo).

RESULTS

Majority of applications were in upper GI tract (89%) with following bleeding sources: peptic ulcer disease (35%), esophageal varices (7%), tumor bleeding (11.7%), reflux esophagitis (8.7%), diffuse bleeding and erosions (15.3%). Overall ST success was achieved in 125 patients (81%) and LT success in 81 patients (67%). Re-bleeding occurred in 27% of all patients. In 72 patients (47%), HP was applied as a salvage hemostatic therapy, here ST and LT success were 81% and 64%, with re-bleeding in 32%. As a primary hemostatic therapy, ST and LT success were 82% and 69%, with re-bleeding occurring in 22%. HS was more frequently applied for upper GI bleeding (P = 0.04)

CONCLUSION

Both HP allow for effective hemostasis with no differences in ST, LT success and re-bleeding.

Hemostatic powder application for control of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastric malignancy

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Despite use of various endoscopic therapies in patients with tumor-related bleeding, various rates of successful immediate hemostasis and short-term rebleeding have been reported. We aimed to evaluate preliminary results of use of the EndoClot polysaccharide hemostatic system (PHS) in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from a gastric malignancy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from a prospectively collected database of 12 patients with acute UGIB from a gastric malignancy who had been treated with EndoClot PHS. The EndoClot air compressor was used to propel 2 g of absorbable modified polymer particles onto the bleeding site. We checked successful immediate hemostasis, rebleeding events and mortality within 30 days.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled in the study. The median patient age was 72.5 years (range, 57 - 89). The initial median hemoglobin level was 6.75 g/dL (range, 5.4 - 8.9). The median systolic blood pressure was 114 mmHg (range, 86 - 153). Eleven patients had advanced gastric cancer and one patient had a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The lower body of the stomach was the most common tumor location (58.3 %), and the median tumor size was 40 mm (range, 15 - 100). Immediate hemostasis was achieved in all patients, and rebleeding developed in 2 of 12 patients (16 %), 3 and 5 days after treatment. There were no significant Endoclot PHS-related adverse events, and there was no all-cause mortality at 30 days after the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoclot PHS represents a new alternative, complementary, and promising therapy for patients with an acute UGIB from a gastric malignancy.

Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in patients with malignant GI bleeding treated with a novel endoscopically delivered hemostatic powder

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic hemostatic techniques remain poorly effective for GI tumor bleeding. We assessed Tc-325 (Hemospray, Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind, USA) for this indication and determined possible predictors of decreased recurrent bleeding and improved 6-month survival in affected patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified 99 patients with active malignant GI bleeding (primary or metastatic) treated with Tc-325. Eleven patients were excluded because of incomplete data. Data on patient characteristics and possible predictive factors of early (72-hour) and delayed (7-, 14-, and 30-day) recurrent bleeding, as well as 6-month survival, were collected.

RESULTS

Overall, 70.5% were male (age, 65 ± 14 years). Half had a high Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (3 or 4). An upper GI cancer was found in 56.8%, and 72.7% cancers were stage 4. Of those affected, 51.6% received at least 1 non-endoscopic additional definitive hemostatic treatment after Tc-325. Immediate hemostasis with Tc-325 was 97.7%, with recurrent bleeding noted in 15% (early) and 17% (delayed). Six-month survival was 53.4%. On multivariable analysis, no predictive factor for recurrent bleeding was identified, whereas ECOG score 0 to 2 (P = .001; hazard ratio [HR], 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.47), cancer stage 1 to 3 (P = .04; HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10-0.96), and receiving definite hemostatic treatment alone or in any combination with surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or radiologic embolization (P = .002; HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.59) were significant prognosticators of 6-month survival after adjusting for comorbidity, type of cancer bleeding, and presence of a coagulopathy.

CONCLUSION

Before definitive therapy can be offered, Tc-325 provides effective initial hemostasis of tumoral GI bleeding. Good performance status, non-end-stage cancer, and receiving definite hemostatic treatment are independent predictors of 6-month survival. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03066700.).

Using Hemospray Improves the Cost-effectiveness Ratio in the Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Nonvariceal Bleeding

GOALS

We compared the cost-effectiveness of traditional recommended endoscopic hemostatic therapies and Hemospray alone or in combination when treating nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB).

BACKGROUND

Hemospray (TC-325) is a novel endoscopic hemostatic powder, achieving hemostasis through adherence to actively bleeding biological surfaces.

STUDY

A decision tree of patients with NVUGIB assessed 4 possible treatment strategies: traditional therapy alone (T), Hemospray alone (H), traditional therapy completed by Hemospray if needed (T+H), or Hemospray completed by traditional therapy if needed (H+T). Using published probabilities, effectiveness was the likelihood of avoiding rebleeding over 30 days. Costs in 2014 US$ were based on the US National Inpatient Sample. A third-party payer perspective was adopted. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

For all patients, T+H was more efficacious (97% avoiding rebleeding) and less expensive (average cost per patient of US$9150) than all other approaches. The second most cost-effective approach was H+T (5.57% less effective and US$635 more per patient). Sensitivity analyses showed T+H followed by a strategy of H+T remained more cost-effective than H or T alone when varying all probability assumptions across plausible ranges. Subgroup analysis showed that the inclusion of H (especially alone) was least adapted for ulcers and was more cost-effective when treating lesions at low risk of delayed rebleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemospray improves the effectiveness of traditional hemostasis, being less costly in most NVUGIB patient populations. A Hemospray first approach is most cost-effective for nonulcer bleeding lesions at low risk of delayed hemorrhage.