Treatment cessation in noncirrhotic, e-antigen negative chronic hepatitis B is safe and effective following prolonged anti-viral suppression with nucleosides/nucleotides

Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroclearance Rate After Stopping Nucleos(t)ide Analogues in Chronic Hepatitis B-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIM

To identify factors influencing HBsAg seroclearance rates after stopping nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in databases from inception to July 2024. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to determine factors associated with HBsAg seroclearance, including ethnicity, HBV genotype, NA therapy duration, end-of-treatment (EOT) qHBsAg levels, HBeAg status, cirrhosis status, and follow-up duration.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 62 studies (n = 9867) with a pooled HBsAg seroclearance rate of 10% (95%CI: 8%-12%, I2 = 92%) after NA cessation. HBeAg-negative patients showed significantly higher rates than HBeAg-positive patients (11% vs. 5%, p = 0.030). Subgroup analysis revealed higher seroclearance with follow-up of >5 years (18%, p = 0.004), showing significantly higher rates were observed in studies with longer follow-up periods. Caucasians showed a higher rate (12%) than Asians (9%, p = 0.067). Studies adhering to AASLD, EASL, or APASL stopping rules showed no significant differences in rates. Patients with EOT qHBsAg ≤2.0 log IU/mL had higher rates (23%) than those with >2.0 log IU/mL (11%). Re-treated patients had lower seroclearance (6%) compared to those not re-treated (17%, p = 0.178). Meta-regression identified ethnicity, HBeAg status, and follow-up duration as significant contributors to heterogeneity. Egger's test showed no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.1928).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis highlights the role of ethnicity, EOT qHBsAg levels, HBeAg-status, and follow-up duration in determining HBsAg seroclearance rates. These findings stress the need for personalized NA discontinuation strategies and further research on HBV genotypes and biomarkers to improve treatment outcomes and predict seroclearance more accurately.

Long-Term Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Profile and Seroclearance Following Antiviral Treatment: A Single-Center, Real-World Cohort Study

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance, an indicator of recovery from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, is uncommon in long-term nucleos(t)ide analog (NUC) therapy. We compared the incidence of HBsAg seroclearance in patients with and without NUC discontinuation to identify predictors of HBsAg seroclearance. This retrospective study enrolled adult patients with a chronic HBV infection followed for ≥12 months after NUC discontinuation (finite group) and those treated with NUCs for >3 years (non-finite group). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were analyzed. The study cohort included 978 patients, including 509 and 469 patients in the finite and non-finite groups, respectively. Cumulative HBsAg seroclearance incidence was significantly higher in the finite group than in the non-finite group (p = 0.006). The 5- and 10-year cumulative HBsAg seroclearance incidence were 6.6% and 18.9% in the finite group and 3% and 14.6% in the non-finite group, respectively. The likelihood of HBsAg seroclearance was higher in those with end of treatment (EOT) HBsAg levels of <100 IU/mL and in those without clinical relapse (CR). The cumulative 3-year CR incidence was 16.8%. The incidence of liver decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma were 4.1 and 0.4 per 1000 person-years, respectively. The hepatocellular carcinoma incidence did not significantly differ between the finite and non-finite groups (p = 0.941). In conclusion, higher HBsAg seroclearance incidence in patients receiving finite therapy, and the increased likelihood of HBsAg seroclearance in those with EOT HBsAg levels of <100 IU/mL and in those without CR should be considered during decision-making of treatment options.

Discontinuation of nucleot(s)ide analogue therapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sustained virological suppression and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss have been described after nucleot(s)ide analogue (NA) discontinuation for patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We performed a meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes after NA discontinuation for HBeAg-negative CHB.

METHODS

Studies involving NA cessation in HBeAg-negative CHB individuals with a median follow-up of ≥12 months were included. Participants were HBeAg-negative at the time of NA initiation. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for the following clinical outcomes: (1) virological relapse (VR) at 6 and 12 months; (2) clinical relapse (CR) at 6 and 12 months and (3) HBsAg loss. Effect of other variables was estimated using subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Studies including patients stopping entecavir (ETV) and/or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) were considered separately to studies including patients stopping older generation NA.

RESULTS

N=37 studies met inclusion criteria. Cumulative incidence of VR and CR after stopping ETV/TDF was 44% and 17% at 6 months and 63% and 35% at 12 months. Similar relapse rates were observed after stopping older NAs. Among patients stopping ETV/TDF, TDF cessation was associated with increased CR rates at 6 months versus ETV. There was an association between follow-up ≥4 years and HBsAg loss rates when stopping older NAs. Hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma were rare but occurred more frequently in studies including cirrhotic individuals.

CONCLUSION

VR is common after NA discontinuation, however, CR was only seen in one-third of patients at 12 months. Stopping NA therapy can be followed by HBsAg clearance, and rates are higher with longer follow-up.

Biomarkers for predicting nucleos(t)ide analogs discontinuation and hepatitis B virus recurrence after drug withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM

To summarize HBV-related biomarkers predicting nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) discontinuation and hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after drug withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, providing references for clinical medication, so as to manage CHB patients more scientifically.

METHODS

Related pieces of literature were retrieved in PubMed and the results were sorted out. We then analyzed and summarized these articles.

RESULTS

We found that HBV related biomarkers maybe could predict NAs withdrawal safely and the possibility of relapse after treatment cessation, including hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV DNA, HBV RNA, pregenomic-RNA (pgRNA), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), and models containing several indicators for predicting the effectiveness of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV DNA, HBV RNA, pgRNA, HBcrAg, anti-HBc, as well as the prediction models formed by several biomarkers could predict the safe discontinuation of NAs before HBsAg loss and recurrence.

Risks and Benefits of Discontinuation of Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Treatment: A Treatment Concept for Patients With HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B

Systematic discontinuation of long-term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) is one strategy to increase functional cure rates in patients with chronic hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative hepatitis B. Currently, available study results are heterogeneous; however, long-term hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss rates of up to 20% have been reported in prospective trials. This review proposes criteria that can be used when considering NA discontinuation in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV). Discontinuing NA treatment frequently results in a virologic and biochemical relapse that runs through different phases: the lag phase, reactivation phase, and consolidation phase. The HBV-DNA flares observed during the reactivation phase are often transient and most likely represent a trigger for inducing a long-term immune control by specific CD8+ T cells, and therefore do not need immediate interventions but close follow-up evaluation. Low HBsAg levels at the time of treatment cessation predict a positive long-term response to NA discontinuation associated with a higher likelihood of HBsAg clearance. Other host and viral biomarkers are currently under evaluation that may prove to be helpful to further characterize the population that may benefit most from the finite NA treatment concept. Potential harmful biochemical flares during the reactivation phase need to be identified early and can be effectively terminated by reintroducing NA treatment. Hepatic decompensation represents a risk to patients with cirrhosis undergoing NA discontinuation. Therefore, the finite NA approach should only be considered after excluding advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis and if a close follow-up of the patient and supervision by an experienced physician can be guaranteed. Conclusion: For selected patients, NA discontinuation has become a powerful tool to achieve control over HBeAg-negative HBV infections. Its significant effect represents a challenge to novel treatment approaches, but it may also serve as their enhancer.

Challenges in the discontinuation of chronic hepatitis B antiviral agents

Long-term antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients has been proven to be beneficial in reducing liver-related complications. However, lengthy periods of daily administration of medication have some inevitable drawbacks, including decreased medication adherence, increased cost of treatment, and possible long-term side effects. Currently, discontinuation of antiviral agent has become the strategy of interest to many hepatologists, as it might alleviate the aforementioned drawbacks and increase the probability of achieving functional cure. This review focuses on the current evidence of the outcomes following stopping antiviral treatment and the factors associated with subsequent hepatitis B virus relapse, hepatitis B surface antigen clearance, and unmet needs.

The Yin and the Yang of Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B-When to Start, When to Stop Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy

Over 257 million individuals worldwide are chronically infected with the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV). Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are the first-line treatment option for most patients. Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are both potent, safe antiviral agents, have a high barrier to resistance, and are now off patent. They effectively suppress HBV replication to reduce the risk of cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment is continued long-term in most patients, as NA therapy rarely induces HBsAg loss or functional cure. Two diverging paradigms in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B have recently emerged. First, the public health focussed "treat-all" strategy, advocating for early and lifelong antiviral therapy to minimise the risk of HCC as well as the risk of HBV transmission. In LMICs, this strategy may be cost saving compared to monitoring off treatment. Second, the concept of "stopping" NA therapy in patients with HBeAg-negative disease after long-term viral suppression, a personalised treatment strategy aiming for long-term immune control and even HBsAg loss off treatment. In this manuscript, we will briefly review the current standard of care approach to the management of hepatitis B, before discussing emerging evidence to support both the "treat-all" strategy, as well as the "stop" strategy, and how they may both have a role in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Emerging Diagnostic Tools to Decide When to Discontinue Nucleos(t)ide Analogues in Chronic Hepatitis B

The aim of this review is to outline emerging biomarkers that can serve as diagnostic tools to identify non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who could safely discontinue nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) before HBsAg loss. Regarding possible predictors of post-NAs outcomes, a number of studies have evaluated numerous factors, which can be categorised in markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) activity, markers of host immune response and markers of other patient characteristics. In clinical practice, the most important question for patients who discontinue NAs is to differentiate those who will benefit by achieving HBsAg loss or at least by remaining in remission and those who will relapse requiring retreatment. Most of the discontinuation studies so far came from Asian and only few from European populations and examined the rates and predictors of post-NA virological and/or combined relapses or HBsAg loss. To date, there is still controversy about predictors of post-NA relapses, while only HBsAg serum levels at NA discontinuation seem to be the most robust predictive marker of the probability of subsequent off-treatment HBsAg seroclearance. Newer viral markers such as HBV RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen seem promising, but further research is required.

Finite nucleos(t)ide analog therapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: an emerging paradigm shift

Potent nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUC), such as entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, are able to suppress HBV DNA to undetectable level. These agents have no direct action on cccDNA, which is a very stable template for HBV production, hence long-term or even life-long NUC therapy is required in HBeAg-negative patients to maintain HBV suppression and to achieve the ultimate goal of HBsAg loss. However, there are concerns of indefinite or life-long NUC therapy, including drug resistance, financial burden, adherence and willingness for indefinite long-term NUC therapy. Patients lost to follow-up and hence, not monitored may risk severe relapse that may deteriorate to hepatic decompensation or even hepatic failure. This Review integrated the cumulated evidence and assessed the strategy of finite NUC therapy in HBeAg-negative patients which was first tried in early 2000s. Earlier Asian findings that 2-year NUC therapy is feasible and safe have founded APASL stopping rule for patients on NUC therapy over 2-3 years since 2008. Subsequent studies have supported the strategy of finite NUC therapy, which has finally been accepted as an option by American and European liver associations since 2016. More recent studies have further shown greatly increased HBsAg loss rate (up to 5-year 39%) after stopping NUC therapy. The cumulated evidence has shown that the paradigm shift from indefinite long-term therapy to finite NUC therapy in HBeAg-negative patients is emerging. More studies are needed to fine-tuning the strategy including research for the optimal duration of consolidation therapy, timing to stop and to start re-treatment.

Predictors of relapse after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analog treatment in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of relapse after the withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases were searched through January 2019. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed, with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) used as summary statistics.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Age (HR=1.022 per year), baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (HR=1.509 per log IU/l), end of treatment (EOT) HBsAg level (HR=1.896 per log IU/l), EOT HBsAg level ≥1000 IU/ml (HR=1.749), and HBsAg decline from baseline to EOT (HR=0.748 per log IU/l) were associated with virological relapse. The predictors of clinical relapse were baseline HBsAg level (HR=1.312 per log IU/l), EOT HBsAg level (HR=1.458 per log IU/l), EOT HBsAg level ≥100IU/ml (HR=3.199) or ≥1000 IU/ml (HR=1.810), and duration of consolidation therapy (HR=0.991 per month).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicates that age, the duration of consolidation therapy, and levels of baseline and EOT HBsAg were factors predictive of relapse in HBeAg-negative CHB patients who discontinued NA treatment.

Significance of definitions of relapse after discontinuation of oral antivirals in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

Relapses are observed in most hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who discontinue treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs); however, the rates of relapse vary widely among studies, and whether all patients with relapse need retreatment is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different definitions on the rates of posttreatment relapse and therefore on the probability of retreatment in patients who have discontinued effective long-term NA therapy. In total, 130 HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients without cirrhosis and before NA treatment were included. All had on-therapy virological remission for ≥24 months and close follow-up for ≥12 months after stopping NA treatment or until retreatment, which started on stringent predefined criteria. Relapses rates based on several predetermined definitions of virological and perhaps biochemical criteria were assessed. The median duration of therapy was 60 months and the median duration of on-therapy virological remission was 43 months. During a median off-NAs follow-up of 15 months, no patient experienced liver decompensation or died. Cumulative relapse rates were 2%-49%, 4%-73%, 11%-82%, and 16%-90% at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, whereas cumulative retreatment rates were 15%, 22%, and 40% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, after discontinuation of NA therapy. No patient characteristic was independently associated with the probability of relapse based on at least two definitions or of retreatment.

CONCLUSION

In HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who discontinue NA therapy, the definition of relapse has a great impact on off-NAs relapse rates and potentially on the probability of retreatment. Regardless of definition, off-NAs relapses cannot be easily predicted by patient characteristics. A substantial proportion of such patients may not require retreatment if stringent criteria are adopted. (Hepatology 2017).

Incidence and predictors of hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is a rare event during nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapy. Limited data suggest that stopping Nuc therapy may increase HBsAg loss rate in hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients. A large study was conducted to investigate this issue in more detail. Of the 1,075 hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients treated with Nuc for a median of 156 (61-430) weeks, 5 showed HBsAg seroclearance during treatment at an estimated annual incidence of 0.15%. Of the patients who remained HBsAg-seropositive, 691 (52.3 years old, 86% male, 44.6% cirrhosis) had stopped Nuc therapy by the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver stopping rule and then were prospectively followed up. Baseline and on-treatment clinical and viral features, treatment duration, consolidation duration, time to undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA, time to normal alanine aminotransferase, end-of-treatment HBsAg, and HBsAg log reduction were compared between patients with and without HBsAg seroclearance after end of treatment. During a median off-therapy follow-up period of 155 (2-614) weeks, HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed in 42 patients. The 6-year cumulative incidence was 13% with an estimated annual incidence of 1.78%. Cox regression analysis showed that shorter time to undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA (<12 weeks), greater HBsAg reduction during therapy (>1 log₁₀ ), lower end-of-treatment HBsAg level (<100 IU/mL), patients with sustained response, and relapsers not retreated were factors for off-therapy HBsAg seroclearance.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of HBsAg seroclearance after stopping Nuc was much higher than that during therapy and highest in patients without virologic and clinical relapse; patients with clinical relapse who remained untreated had a 7.34 times higher incidence of HBsAg clearance than those who received retreatment, suggesting that transient untreated clinical relapse may drive sufficient immune control to functional cure. (Hepatology 2017).

Why not to stop antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B with entecavir or tenofovir leads to viral suppression in almost all patients. However, prolonged or lifelong treatment is necessary. At present, there is no consensus among the three major guidelines for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B on whether or not to stop antiviral treatment. One of the main reasons for this controversy is that virological relapse has been well documented in patients with chronic hepatitis B who stop treatment. Relapse rate is particularly high in patients who are HBeAg-negative when treatment begins, with reported relapse rates of up to 70% 36 months after treatment discontinuation. Moreover, hepatic decompensation, jaundice and death have been described in patients with cirrhosis after treatment discontinuation. The main reason for stopping antiviral treatment is related to cost, however there is no robust evidence to support treatment discontinuation in most patients.

Stopping long-term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues is a favourable option for selected patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

The immune response against the infection is impaired in patients with chronic hepatitis B, and although HBV DNA can effectively be suppressed by nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA), durable immune control is only established in a minority of patients. This especially applies in HBeAg-negative patients who usually must receive lifelong NA treatment. Calculated withdrawal of NA leads to a relapse of HBV DNA in most patients. There is evidence that this sudden exposure of viral antigens can trigger immune control in some patients which may result in HBsAg loss or a form of immune control, then sustained low HBV DNA levels and normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT). In the first prospective randomized trial investigating tenofovir treatment cessation in HBeAg-negative patients, most patients did not need retreatment after NA cessation, although all patients showed a transient relapse in HBV DNA. HBsAg loss was identified in almost 20% nearly 3 years after stopping NA. Further confirmation of these findings is needed in larger randomized trials and patients who are most likely to benefit from finite therapy must be identified to individualize NA stopping strategies. However, these results suggest that in patients without risk factors such as cirrhosis or other severe conditions, NA treatment may be stopped, as long as adequate safety rules for retreatment are followed.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with recurrent chronic hepatitis B after nucleos(t)ide analog withdrawal with stringent cessation criteria: A prospective cohort study

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with recurrent chronic hepatitis B meeting the cessation criteria outlined by the 2008 Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines.

METHODS

In total, 223 chronic hepatitis B patients who met the cessation criteria and discontinued nucleos(t)ide analog therapy were prospectively included. They were monitored monthly during the first 4 months and every 3-6 months thereafter. Early relapse was defined as viral relapse (serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA >10⁴ copies/mL) confirmed within 3 months after cessation.

RESULTS

Of the 38 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive relapse cases, 44.7%, 65.8%, 76.3% and 89.5% occurred within 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 48 months, respectively; in the 49 HBeAg-negative relapse cases, 44.9%, 51.0%, 77.6% and 91.8% occurred within 3, 6, 12 and 36 months, respectively. Time to undetectable HBV DNA was a predictive factor of early relapse. Viral relapses were accompanied by elevated alanine aminotransferase in 70 (80.5%) patients. A peak alanine aminotransferase 10 times over the upper limit of normal after relapse was observed in 15.8% of the HBeAg-positive and 22.4% of the HBeAg-negative patients. Hepatic decompensation and liver failure were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

For HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients meeting stringent cessation criteria, at least 4 years and 3 years of close follow-up are necessary. For those with a longer time to undetectable HBV DNA, more attention should be paid to the early stages after cessation. Nucleos(t)ide analog withdrawal in selected non-cirrhotic patients is generally safe, although close monitoring and timely intervention are needed.

Discontinuation of lamivudine treatment in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: a pilot study with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Finite treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs) is important in resource-limited countries. Outcome of treatment discontinuation in patients on long-term lamivudine (LVD) was assessed in a single centre observational pilot study in the current study.

METHODS

Non-cirrhotic patients on LVD for at least 5 years with undetectable HBV DNA on at least two consecutive assessments were offered to stop treatment. Biochemical, serological and virological measures were determined at 3-6 month intervals after treatment discontinuation. Serum quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was determined at treatment discontinuation and 5-6 years thereafter. NA treatment was re-instituted in patients with confirmed viral rebound defined as HBV DNA >20,000 IU/ml. Relapser patients were no longer followed but were re-assessed 6 years after treatment cessation.

RESULTS

LVD was discontinued in 23 patients. 8 patients relapsed within 1 year and NA treatment was restarted; 15 patients (65%) were non-relapsers. Thirteen of them were followed for at least 5 years. Two patients had undetectable HBV DNA throughout the follow-up period. In the rest, HBV DNA fluctuated at low levels. Two patients cleared HBsAg 24 and 36 months after stopping treatment. Quantitative HBsAg levels 5-7 years after treatment discontinuation were lower in non-relapser compared to relapser patients (1.21 IU/ml ±0.98 versus 2.71 ±0.76; P=0.002). Of 8 relapser patients 1 patient had HBsAg levels less than 100 IU/ml compared to 11 out of 13 non-relapser patients (P=0.0022).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that cessation of NA treatment is a viable option after a reasonable treatment duration in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB and that HBsAg clearance may become an achievable target in these patients.

Predictors of response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus peginterferon alfa-2a combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic hepatitis B, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for 48-weeks results in higher rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss than either monotherapy.

AIM

To identify baseline and on-treatment factors associated with HBsAg loss at Week 72 and provide a model for predicting HBsAg loss in patients receiving combination therapy for 48 weeks.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of data from an open-label study where patients were randomised to TDF (300 mg/day, oral) plus PEG-IFN (PI, 180 μg/week, subcutaneous) for 48 weeks (TDF/PI-48w); TDF plus PEG-IFN for 16 weeks, TDF for 32 weeks (TDF/PI-16w+TDF-32w); TDF for 120 weeks (TDF-120w) or PEG-IFN for 48 weeks (PI-48w). Logistic regression methods were used to identify models that best predicted HBsAg loss at Week 72.

RESULTS

Rates of HBsAg loss at Week 72 were significantly higher in the TDF/PI-48w group (6.5%) than in the TDF/PI-16w+TDF-32w (0.5%), TDF-120w (0%) and PI-48w (2.2%) groups (P = 0.09). The only baseline factor associated with response was genotype A. HBsAg decline at Week 12 or 24 of treatment was associated with HBsAg loss at Week 72 (P < 0.001). HBsAg decline >3.5 log10 IU/mL at Week 24 in the TDF/PI-48w group resulted in a positive predictive value of 85% and a negative predictive value of 99% for HBsAg loss at Week 72.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg decline at Week 24 of TDF plus PEG-IFN combination therapy may identify patients who, after completing 48 weeks of treatment, have a better chance of achieving HBsAg loss at Week 72.

Hepatitis B surface antigen titer is a good indicator of durable viral response after entecavir off-treatment for chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Clear indicators for stopping antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients are not yet available. Since the level of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is correlated with covalently closed circular DNA, the HBsAg titer might be a good indicator of the off-treatment response. This study aimed to determine the relationship between the HBsAg titer and the entecavir (ETV) off-treatment response.

METHODS

This study analyzed 44 consecutive CHB patients (age, 44.6±11.4 years, mean±SD; men, 63.6%; positive hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) at baseline, 56.8%; HBV DNA level, 6.8±1.3 log₁₀ IU/mL) treated with ETV for a sufficient duration and in whom treatment was discontinued after HBsAg levels were measured. A virological relapse was defined as an increase in serum HBV DNA level of >2000 IU/mL, and a clinical relapse was defined as a virological relapse with a biochemical flare, defined as an increase in the serum alanine aminotransferase level of >2 × upper limit of normal.

RESULTS

After stopping ETV, virological relapse and clinical relapse were observed in 32 and 24 patients, respectively, during 20.8±19.9 months of follow-up. The cumulative incidence rates of virological relapse were 36.2% and 66.2%, respectively, at 6 and 12 months, and those of clinical relapse were 14.3% and 42.3%. The off-treatment HBsAg level was an independent factor associated with clinical relapse (hazard ratio, 2.251; 95% confidence interval, 1.076-4.706; P=0.031). When patients were grouped according to off-treatment HBsAg levels, clinical relapse did not occur in patients with an off-treatment HBsAg level of ≤2 log₁₀ IU/mL (n=5), while the incidence rates of clinical relapse at 12 months after off-treatment were 28.4% and 55.7% in patients with off-treatment HBsAg levels of >2 and ≤3 log₁₀ IU/mL (n=11) and >3 log₁₀ IU/mL (n=28), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The off-treatment HBsAg level is closely related to clinical relapse after treatment cessation. A serum HBsAg level of <2 log₁₀ IU/mL is an excellent predictor of a sustained off-treatment response in CHB patients who have received ETV for a sufficient duration.

Assessing the Durability of Entecavir-Treated Hepatitis B Using Quantitative HBsAg

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess whether quantitative HBsAg can predict durability of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients stopping entecavir (ETV) treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter study on non-cirrhotic CHB patients who discontinued ETV treatment. The primary end points were clinical relapse and sustained viral response (SVR), which was defined as undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels (<6 IU/ml) at 12 months off-therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 117 consecutive CHB patients were enrolled. Among them, 93 patients who received more than 1-year off-therapy follow-up were included for the final analysis. The duration of off-therapy follow-up was 24.8±11.6 months. All 12 patients who did not achieve therapeutic end points had clinical relapse. In 81 patients who achieved therapeutic end points, clinical relapse and SVR were observed in 44 (54.3%) and 11 (13.6%) patients, respectively. The serum HBV DNA at 3 months and 6 months off-therapy were associated with clinical relapse over time, whereas quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) level at 6 months off-therapy had a marginal effect. Furthermore, end-of-treatment qHBsAg levels were associated with SVR (P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The serum qHBsAg level off-therapy can predict durability of ETV-treated CHB patients. It may guide clinicians to select which patients can maintain sustained viral suppression or need retreatment after discontinuing ETV treatment.

Hepatitis B: treatment choice and monitoring for response and resistance

Despite effective preventive primary prevention with vaccination, many people remain infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and suffer from its complications. Effective treatments such as interferon-based regimens and oral nucleoside/nucleotides have been developed over the last 30 years, but they are not perfect. Each of the treatments has its own merits, but none can eradicate HBV from the host. As a result, regular monitoring of the response during treatment and after treatment is required. The choice and monitoring of selected treatments, new potential therapeutic agents, and treatment options for drug resistance are discussed in this review.

Discontinuation of oral antivirals in chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review

The possibility of safe discontinuation of therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) remains one of the most controversial topics in the management of chronic hepatitis B. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the existing data on NA discontinuation in this setting and tried to identify factors affecting the probability of posttherapy remission. A literature search was performed in order to identify all published studies including patients who discontinued NAs in virological remission (VR) and were followed for ≥12 months thereafter. Twenty-five studies with 1716 patients were included. The pooled rates of durable VR remission were 51.4%, 39.3%, and 38.2% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, after NA discontinuation, being relatively higher in initially hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients (62.5%, 53.4%, 51.5%) than HBeAg-negative patients (43.7%, 31.3%, 30.1%) (P = 0.064). The weighted probability of durable biochemical remission was 65.4%, being numerically higher in HBeAg-positive than HBeAg-negative patients (76.2% versus 56.7%, P = 0.130). The weighted probability of hepatitis B surface antigen loss was 2.0%. The rates of durable VR did not significantly differ according to the VR definition (hepatitis B virus DNA <200, < 2000, < 20,000 IU/mL) or duration of on-therapy VR in HBeAg-positive patients, but they were significantly higher in studies with HBeAg-negative patients and on-therapy VR > 24 than ≤ 24 months (VR at 12 months off-NAs: 75.0% versus 35.6%, P = 0.005). The weighted probability of durable HBeAg seroconversion was 91.9% and 88.0% at 12 and 24 months, respectively, after NA discontinuation without being affected by the duration of on-therapy VR or consolidation therapy (>6 months in all studies).

CONCLUSION

Durable VR seems to be feasible in a substantial proportion of patients who discontinue long-term NA therapy; on-therapy VR > 24 months offers higher chances of off-NA VR in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.

Management of HBV and HBV/HDV-Associated Liver Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) co-infection lead to liver cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We review the current knowledge of the management of HBV mono-infection and HBV/HDV co-infection with a special emphasis on liver cirrhosis.

RESULTS

Treatment options for chronic hepatitis B are pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC). PEG-IFN is a finite option to achieve hepatitis B surface antigen loss in compensated cirrhosis. However, this goal is rare. NUC are potent to achieve HBV DNA suppression but long-term treatment is mandatory in most cases. Long-term treatment with NUC can lead to reversion of liver cirrhosis, improve liver function, prevent liver transplantation, and reduces but does not eliminate the risk for development of HCC. Treatment options for hepatitis D are limited to PEG-IFN. Although late relapse is common, treatment with PEG-IFN reduces disease progression. However, new treatments are urgently needed for HDV infection.

CONCLUSION

Early treatment of chronic hepatitis B and D is important to prevent complications of cirrhosis. HCC surveillance remains important in patients with cirrhosis.

Clinical outcomes after interruption of entecavir therapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with compensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy may reduce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic hepatitis B patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis.

AIM

To investigate in a retrospective-prospective study whether this beneficial effect would be reduced in cirrhotic patients who discontinued a successful course of entecavir (ETV) therapy.

METHODS

The study included 586 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients with compensated cirrhosis, mean age of 53.8 ± 10 years and 81% males, treated with ETV for at least 12 months. After ETV therapy for 46.5 ± 22.9 months, 205 patients who achieved hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA suppression discontinued therapy. The clinical outcomes were assessed and HCC incidence was compared between propensity score (PS)-matched patients who continued and patients who discontinued ETV therapy by Asian Pacific Association for the Study of Liver stopping rule.

RESULTS

During a mean duration of 59.3 ± 19 months after start of ETV therapy, nine and six HCC developed in an estimated annual incidence of 2.3% and 1.6% in 154 PS-matched patients who continued and who discontinued ETV therapy, respectively (P = 0.587). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses showed that age (HR 1.065, P < 0.001) and HBV DNA (HR 1.216, P = 0.048) were the significant factors for HCC development. The rates of adverse clinical outcomes were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes, including HCC, after cessation of a successful course of entecavir therapy in patients with compensated cirrhosis were comparable to those who continued therapy. The results suggest that this strategy of finite therapy is safe and a feasible alternative to indefinite therapy, especially in a low resources setting.

New paradigms in hepatitis B management: only diamonds are forever

INTRODUCTION

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in ∼350 million people worldwide who have an increased risk of end-stage liver disease and/or hepatocellular carcinoma.

SOURCES OF DATA

Several peer-reviewed papers featuring new approaches to anti-HBV management. Additionally, we also reviewed recent abstract presentations at international congresses.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

There has been great progress in CHB therapy with the development of standard and pegylated interferon (i.e. PEG-IFN) as well as nucleos/tide analogs (NAs). IFN has both antiviral and immunomodulatory effects and through immune-mediated destruction of infected hepatocytes offers the possibility of finite therapy. However, this 'killing for a cure' antiviral strategy may not be tolerated in many, especially in cirrhotic patients. NAs inhibit viral reverse transcriptase, have few side effects and prevent liver disease progression, but cannot offer a cure as they have little effect on the resilient HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) intermediate. Moreover, NAs such as tenofovir and entecavir offer a high genetic barrier to resistance, but are expensive and not readily available in many global regions.

GROWING POINTS

Despite significant treatment advances, there is increased recognition of the need for improved anti-HBV treatments, and new virologic tests for monitoring treatment response.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The role of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen, intrahepatic cccDNA levels and viral genotype in selecting treatment candidates and refining NA stopping rules.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING NEW RESEARCH

Potential new therapies include viral entry inhibitors, RNA interference technologies (i.e. RNAi) and small molecules that modulate cccDNA transcription, as well as novel immunomodulatory therapies to boost HBV-specific T cell responses. The ultimate goal of new tests and anti-HBV therapies is to reduce the burden and expense of life-long CHB treatment, as 'only diamonds are forever'.

Systematic review: cessation of long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

It has been debated whether finite nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy is feasible in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.

AIM

To review this issue systematically.

METHODS

Using text terms HBsAg and various nucleos(t)ide analogues, PubMed was searched between 1995 and 2014 to find studies on therapy >6 months in adult HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with off-therapy follow-up >6 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies with a total of 1732 patients were identified and included. The median duration of therapy, consolidation therapy and off-therapy follow-up ranged from 6 months to 8 years, 4 to 96 weeks and 6 to 80 months respectively. Patients were monitored with serum ALT and HBV DNA monthly in the first 1-3 months and every 3-6 months afterwards in most studies. The 1-year off-therapy 'virological relapse' (HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL) and 'clinical relapse' (HBV DNA > 2000 IU/mL + ALT elevation) occurred in <70% and <50% of the patients, respectively, and <40% of the patients received re-treatment. These rates were higher in patients with shorter treatment, shorter consolidation therapy and those treated with less potent nucleos(t)ide analogues. Off-therapy severe flares were rare and hepatic decompensation was reported in only one patient with cirrhosis. Biochemical relapse reflecting enhanced immune-mediated hepatocyte killing may lead to a higher chance for off-therapy HBsAg seroclearance and be possibly desirable.

CONCLUSION

With an appropriate stopping rule and a proper off-therapy monitoring plan, cessation of long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy prior to HBsAg seroclearance in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B is a feasible alternative to indefinite treatment.

Durability of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues Treatment in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B

Long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) treatment is usually required for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, whether discontinuation of NUCs is possible in selected patients remains debated. The aim of this study was to assess the durability of NUCs and predictors of sustained response after cessation of NUCs.Ninety-three CHB patients (29 HBeAg-positive and 64 HBeAg-negative) from 2 medical centers in Taiwan with discontinuation of NUCs after a median of 3 years' treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Fifteen (51.7%) HBeAg-positive and 57 (89.1%) HBeAg-negative patients achieved APASL treatment endpoints. Virological relapse (VR) and clinical relapse (CR) were defined according to APASL guidelines.Achieving APASL endpoint was associated with longer median time to CR in HBeAg-positive patients, but not in HBeAg-negative cases. The cumulative 1-year VR and CR rates were 55.3% and 14.4% in HBeAg-positive patients, and 77.7% and 41.9% in HBeAg-negative patients, respectively. In HBeAg-negative patients, baseline HBV DNA >10 IU/mL was the only predictor of VR (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.277, P = 0.019) and CR (HR = 3.378, P = 0.014). HBsAg >200 IU/mL at the end of treatment (EOT) was associated with CR (HR = 3.573, P = 0.023) in patients developing VR. HBeAg-negative patients with low baseline viral loads and low HBsAg levels at EOT had minimal risk of CR after achieving APASL treatment endpoint (P = 0.016).The VR rate is high, but the risk of CR is low within 1 year with consolidation treatment after HBeAg seroconversion. Longer consolidation treatment to reduce the risk of VR should be considered in HBeAg-positive patients. As high risk of VR and CR, cessation of NUCs therapy could be considered only in selected HBeAg-negative patients.

Tenofovir discontinuation after long-term viral suppression in HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B. Can HBsAg levels be useful?

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that antiviral treatment discontinuation is safe and associated with virologic remission in HBeAg-negative patients. However, the period of viral suppression and follow-up in these studies was relatively short.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether continuous viral suppression with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for more than 7 years is associated with HBsAg loss and sustained response after treatment discontinuation and receiving a full course of hepatitis B vaccination.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection and more than 7 years of persistent viral suppression with tenofovir therapy were selected for treatment discontinuation and HBV vaccination. Follow-up with monthly ALT, HBV-DNA, and HBsAg determinations lasted 72 weeks. In patients with viral relapse, the viral quasispecies in the overlapping reverse transcriptase and small surface protein regions was analysed by ultra-deep pyrosequencing.

RESULTS

Eight of 17 HBeAg-negative patients accepted tenofovir discontinuation: 5 patients achieved sustained response (persistent HBV-DNA levels <2000IU/mL and normal ALT) despite an initial virologic relapse, one lost HBsAg, and two needed re-treatment. All patients with an on-treatment HBsAg level decline >5000IU/mL achieved sustained response. Patients with HBsAg level <100IU/mL during an ALT flare after antiviral discontinuation achieved sustained response. Significant changes were seen in the composition of the HBV quasispecies, and half the patients showed changes in HBV genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the majority of patients presented an initial relapse with selection of HBV variants, most achieved sustained response. Changes in HBsAg levels on and off treatment may be useful for predicting the likelihood of virologic remission.

[Is it possible to stop treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs in patients with e-antigen negative chronic hepatitis B? Experience and new expectations]

BACKGROUND

Treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) is usually indefinite, since the loss of HBsAg, as a criterion for its discontinuation, is a rare event. Recent evidence suggests that discontinuing NA therapy may be feasible in selected patients.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the rate of virological relapse in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB who discontinued treatment with NAs.

METHODS

We performed a single-center observational study that included 140 patients with HBsAg-negative CHB. Twenty-two patients, who received only NAs, discontinued treatment for different reasons and were subsequently monitored. All had normal ALT and AST, undetectable DNA and absence of cirrhosis or significant comorbidities before stopping treatment.

RESULTS

Twelve patients showed virologic relapse (54.54%). The mean interval between discontinuation and relapse was 6.38 months (± 1.9) (75% relapsed during the first 12 months after discontinuation). Five received adefovir, 1 lamivudine and adefovir, 1 tenofovir and 5 lamivudine alone. The mean treatment duration in this group was 38.5 months (± 4.5). The sustained response group had a higher mean age and longer treatment duration than patients with virologic relapse but these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that NA treatment can be stopped in selected patients with CHB as long as they are not cirrhotic, have completed a minimum period of treatment, have normal ALT and sustained undetectable DNA. These patients should be closely monitored during the first year and then indefinitely.

Update on Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Focus on Treatment

This review article is an update of the current treatment strategies available for chronic hepatitis B. In addition to achieving on-therapy clinical remission and suppression of HBV replication without resistance, the ultimate goal of therapy is the development of sustained remission and HBsAg loss after discontinuation of treatment. This is the closest possible to cure outcome for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. These goals can be achieved by response-guided courses of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN)-alpha at rates higher than 30%, both in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. Review of the data regarding discontinuation of long term NA treatment in HBeAg-negative patients revealed that stopping such therapy is safe with high rates of sustained off treatment responses that appear to be immunologically induced. Decreasing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) titers under therapy to <500, particularly <100 IU/mL, and adding a course of peg-IFN to ongoing long term nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy increase the percentage of sustained responses following discontinuation of NA treatment.