Editorial: the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection worldwide-knowns and unknowns. Authors' reply

Anxiety and depression prevalence in digestive cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cancers of the digestive system can be associated with disturbing and disabling symptoms, which can contribute to a negative psychological pressure on patients.

AIM

To investigate the reported prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with major digestive cancers, including oesophageal, gastric, colorectal, pancreatic or hepatic cancers.

METHODS

We searched Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for articles published from inception to December 2020. We included studies reporting the prevalence of anxiety or depression symptoms using validated questionnaires in adult patients (≥18 years).

RESULTS

In total, 51 eligible papers were finally included. Overall, the pooled prevalence of anxiety symptoms was 20.4% (95% CI 17% to 23.8%). The estimate in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers was 19.1% and in patients with hepatic cancer was 29.1%. Among GI cancers, the highest pooled prevalence of anxiety symptoms related to oesophageal cancer (20.6%), while the lowest pooled prevalence pertained to gastric cancer (18.7%). Regarding depression symptoms, the overall pooled prevalence was 30.2% (95% CI 24.3% to 36.1%). The estimate in patients with GI cancers was 31% and in patients with hepatic cancer was 21.5%. Among GI cancers, the highest pooled prevalence of depression symptoms related to oesophageal cancer (45.2%), while the lowest pooled prevalence pertained to colorectal cancer (22.9%).

CONCLUSION

A considerable prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms is observed in patients with digestive cancers. Screening and preventive measures with early management of these psychological problems by clinicians could possibly improve outcomes for these patients.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020210079.

Association Between Anxiety/Depression and Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

An association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and common psychiatric conditions, most notably anxiety and depression, has been reported. However, the magnitude of this association is poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess this issue.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched multiple bibliographic databases (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to May 15, 2023. We retrieved observational studies that reported the prevalence of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms diagnosed by validated questionnaires in ≥100 adults (aged 18 years or older) with GERD. We also included cohort studies that explored the risk of incident GERD in subjects with anxiety/depression vice versa scenario. Finally, we included Mendelian randomization studies that assessed the cause-and-effect relationship between anxiety/depression and GERD. The extracted data were combined using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, 36 eligible studies were included. The pooled prevalences of anxiety and depressive symptoms were 34.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.7-44.2; I2 = 99.4%) and 24.2% (95% CI 19.9-28.5; I2 = 98.8%) in subjects with GERD based on 30 studies, respectively. Both anxiety and depressive symptoms were more common in subjects with GERD compared with those in healthy controls (odds ratio = 4.46 [95% CI 1.94-10.25] and odds ratio = 2.56 [95% CI 1.11-5.87], respectively). According to 3 cohort studies, subjects with GERD were at an increased risk of developing anxiety/depression and vice versa. Finally, 3 Mendelian randomization studies showed that genetic liability to these mood disorders is linked to an increased risk of developing GERD and vice versa.

DISCUSSION

Up to 1 in 3 subjects with GERD experience anxiety and depression. There is likely a bidirectional causal relationship between anxiety/depression and GERD.

Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Previous studies have shown a potential association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and some immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but this association has not been analyzed systematically. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain a pooled prevalence estimate of NAFLD among patients with RA to fill this gap in knowledge.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest, for observational studies published from inception to August 31, 2022, which reported prevalence of NAFLD in 100 or more adult (age, ≥18 y) patients with RA. To be included, NAFLD diagnosis was based on either imaging or histologic assessment. The results were presented as pooled prevalence, odds ratio, and 95% CI. The I2 statistic was used to measure the heterogeneity between studies.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 9 eligible studies derived from 4 continents comprising 2178 patients (78.8% women) with RA. The pooled prevalence of NAFLD was 35.3% (95% CI, 19.9-50.6; I2 = 98.6%; P < .001) in patients with RA. All studies used ultrasound for the diagnosis of NAFLD, except for 1 study that used transient elastography. The pooled prevalence of NAFLD in men with RA was significantly higher than in women with RA (35.2%; 95% CI, 24.0-46.5 compared with 22.2%; 95% CI, 17.9-26.58; P for interaction = .048). Each 1-unit increase in body mass index was associated directly with a 24% increased risk of NAFLD in RA patients (adjusted odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17-1.31; I2 = 0.0%; P = .518).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, 1 in 3 patients with RA had NAFLD, which appears comparable with its overall prevalence among the general population. Clinicians should actively screen for NAFLD in patients with RA.

Meta-analysis: prevalence of, and risk factors for, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is found in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, uncertainties remain on the magnitude of the association.

AIMS

To explore systematically the prevalence of, and risk factors for, NAFLD in IBD patients.

METHODS

We searched medical literature using Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest, from inception to September 30, 2021. We included observational studies reporting the prevalence of NAFLD in ≥50 adult patients with IBD. Diagnosis of NAFLD could be based on imaging, histopathology, and/or hepatic steatosis index. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, prior surgery (bowel resection), corticosteroids, biologics and immunomodulators were assessed as potential risk factors for NAFLD.

RESULTS

Of 1893 citations, 44 eligible studies were finally included, comprising 14 947 subjects from 18 different countries. Pooled prevalence of NAFLD was 30.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.5-34.9) in patients with IBD worldwide, which varied regionally. No significant difference was observed in the odds ratio (OR) of NAFLD among Crohn's disease (CD) patients compared with ulcerative colitis (UC) patients (1.16, 95% CI 0.93-1.44). Risk of NAFLD was almost twice as high in patients with IBD as in healthy subjects (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.13-3.41). Age (adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) and BMI (adjusted OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.22-1.32) were statistically significantly associated with increased risk of NAFLD. The pooled prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis in IBD patients with NAFLD was 13.6% (95% CI 7.6-19.7) based on six studies.

CONCLUSION

Up to one-third of patients with IBD experienced NAFLD worldwide. The risk of NAFLD was two times higher in IBD patients versus healthy subjects.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common and potential disabling functional gastrointestinal disorder. Studies have revealed a possible association between IBS and psychological problems, such as anxiety and depression. Existing systematic reviews have addressed only the levels of anxiety or depression in patients with IBS.

AIM

To investigate systematically the prevalence of anxiety or depression in IBS patients METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the related keywords from the bibliographic databases of Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and POPLINE published until 1 January 2019 with no language restriction. Studies reporting the prevalence of anxiety/depressive symptoms/disorders in adult (≥15 years) IBS patients were evaluated. The pooled prevalence, odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated using stata software.

RESULTS

A total of 14 926 articles were initially screened, and finally 73 papers were included. The prevalence rates of anxiety symptoms and disorders in IBS patients were 39.1% (95% CI: 32.4-45.8) and 23% (95% CI: 17.2-28.8) respectively. The ORs for anxiety symptoms and disorders in IBS patients compared with healthy subjects were 3.11 (95% CI: 2.43-3.98) and 2.52 (95% CI: 1.99-3.20) respectively. The prevalence estimates of depressive symptoms and disorders in IBS patients were 28.8% (95% CI: 23.6-34) and 23.3% (95% CI: 17.2-29.4) respectively. The ORs for depressive symptoms and disorders in IBS patients compared to healthy subjects were 3.04 (95% CI: 2.37-3.91) and 2.72 (95% CI: 2.45-3.02) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with IBS have a three-fold increased odds of either anxiety or depression, compared to healthy subjects.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on incidence of prostate cancer in Iran

Background: Prostate cancer is a global health concern. In Iran, its epidemiology is not precisely recognized. We aimed to evaluate incidence of prostate cancer among Iranian populations.

Methods: In this systematic review, we searched the databases PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus and Google Scholar for English studies and the databases Magiran, Scientific information Database, IranMedex and IranDoc for Persian studies, using related keywords. The cross sectional articles published from inception to 31 December 2018 were included. Meta-analysis was conducted on the collected data with STATA software using random effects model.

Results: Out of 763 articles initially obtained, 9 articles were finally included after applying the predefined exclusion criteria. Analysis of 9 studies on the incidence of prostate cancer showed a crude rate of 7.1 per 100000 population (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.6-8.6). Also, the pooled age-standardized incidence rate was 8.7 per 100000 (95% CI: 6.7-10.4). Studies performed in the period 2004-2012 had significantly a higher pooled estimate of the crude incidence rate (9.2 per 100000 [95% CI: 7.9-10.4]) compared with those conducted in the period 1996-2003 (4.5 per 100000 [95% CI: 2.8-6.2]). This trend was also observed based on the age-standardized incidence rate (11 per 100000 [95% CI: 9.4-12.5] versus 6.3 per 100000[95% CI: 4-8.5]).

Conclusion: Despite low rate of prostate cancer occurrence in Iran, it is recommended that preventive measures be taken against this disease by health policymakers. Also, more epidemiological studies are needed to better find out the pattern of prostate cancer among Iranian populations.

Prevalence of osteoporosis with the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. The overall pooled prevalence of osteoporosis was 24.4%. The prevalence has increased significantly over the recent years. The highest pooled prevalence was in Saudi Arabia (32.7%), and the lowest was in Kuwait (15.1%).

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), as defined by the World Health Organization.

METHODS

We included all observational studies reporting the prevalence of osteoporosis among general population. We searched literatures from the databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Index Medicus for the EMR published between January 2000 and December 2017 with no restriction of language. Two reviewers independently contributed in study selection and data extraction. STATA software was used for analyzing the collected data.

RESULTS

A total of 1692 citations were retrieved. After excluding the irrelevant articles, 36 eligible studies were included. The overall pooled prevalence rate of osteoporosis in the EMR on 31,593 participants was 24.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.4-28.4). Based on femoral densitometry, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 16.8% (95% CI, 9.5-24.2), and based on spinal densitometry, it was 24.3% (95% CI, 19.4-29.2). The pooled prevalence in males was 20.5% (95% CI, 10.5-30.5), compared with 24.4% (95% CI, 20.2-28.6) in females. The prevalence rate was significantly higher in 2007-2015 (32.7%; 95% CI, 25.1-40.3) than in 2000-2006 (19.8%; 95% CI, 12.5-27).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate a considerable prevalence of osteoporosis among the people of the EMR. The prevalence has increased during recent years, showing that osteoporosis is becoming a critical health problem in this region. Prevention and control measures need to be implemented by health service authorities.