Using the chronic kidney disease guidelines to evaluate the renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in hepatitis B patients

Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Amibufenamide and Tenofovir Alafenamide for First-Time HBV-Related Decompensated Cirrhosis

Clinical studies of tenofovir amibufenamide (TMF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) treatment in patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis (HBV-DC) are limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of TMF versus TAF in naive-treated patients with first-time HBV-DC. Based on the antiviral drug used, patients were categorised into the TMF group and the TAF group. Virological and serological responses, hepatic and renal functions and blood lipid changes in both groups were evaluated during 48 weeks of treatment. A total of 98 patients were enrolled, 45 in the TMF group and 53 in the TAF group. At 48 weeks of treatment, the proportions of patients who achieved complete virological response (CVR) were 85.7% and 90.7%, respectively (p = 0.791). Improvement of at least 2 points in Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores was observed in 64.3% versus 79.1% (p = 0.169) of the patients. There were no significant changes in serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate or total cholesterol from baseline to week 48 between the two groups. Cystatin C remained stable in the TMF group but increased over time in the TAF group (p < 0.001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol remained stable in the TMF group but increased significantly in the TAF group at week 48 (p = 0.015). These results suggest that both TMF and TAF can rapidly suppress HBV replication, improve hepatic function and have no negative effects on renal function among patients with HBV-DC. Regarding lipid metabolism, both showed a better safety, while regular monitoring of blood lipid levels is recommended.

Renal organic anion transporter 1: clinical relevance and the underlying mechanisms in chronic kidney disease

Organic anion transporter 1 (OAT1), primarily found in the renal proximal tubule, is essential for the excretion of various uremic toxins that contribute to the onset and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). OAT1 also plays a vital role in the remote sensing and signaling network, facilitating the removal of metabolites through the kidneys. The function of OAT1 is impaired under conditions such as renal ischemia/reperfusion injury, oxidative stress, and fibrosis. Several transcription factors, post-translational modifications, and endocrine hormones control the activity and expression of OAT1. This review explores the unique contribution of OAT1 to the excretion of CKD-related UTs and the mechanisms involved.

Effects of entecavir and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate treatment on renal function in Japanese elderly patients with chronic hepatitis B

AIM

Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) are considered safe nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NA) for the kidney. This study aimed to investigate the long-term effects of ETV or TAF on renal function in elderly patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in Japan.

METHODS

The study included 246 CHB patients treated with ETV (184 patients) or TAF (62 patients) for at least 2 years. These patients were divided into two groups: those <65 years of age (130 patients) and those ≥65 years of age (116 patients). The effects of the NAs on renal functions were examined by comparing the estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) from baseline to 2 years between the two groups.

RESULTS

The change in eGFR from baseline to 1 or 2 years after treatment was significantly decreased in both groups. However, the amount of change at 1 and 2 years was significantly greater in the group aged ≥65 years than in the group aged <65 years. The amount of change in eGFR from baseline to 1 and 2 years after treatment was significantly greater in the group aged ≥65 years than in the group aged <65 years, regardless of the type of NA, the prior treatment history, cirrhosis/chronic hepatitis, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. Additionally, logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥65 years was independently associated with a decreased eGFR after 2 years of NA treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term administration of NA to CHB patients over 65 years of age should be carefully monitored for renal impairment.

Dynamic changes of estimated glomerular filtration rate are conversely related to triglyceride in non-overweight patients

BACKGROUND

Correlation between Triglyceride (TG) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remains largely unknown in overweight and non-overweight patients.

AIM

To investigated the dynamic changes of eGFR and lipid profiles during 3-year tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and overweight.

METHODS

A total of 202 CHB patients who received TDF treatment at the Third People's Hospital of Changzhou (Changzhou, China) and Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (Nanjing, China) between January 2016 and May 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. According to the body mass index (BMI) at the initiation of TDF treatment, CHB patients were divided into overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) and non-overweight (BMI < 25 kg/m²) groups. Logistic regression was applied for the analysis of risk factors for eGFR < 90 mL/(min·1.73 m²).

RESULTS

There is no significant difference in hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) negativity and hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) loss between patients with overweight and non-overweight (both P > 0.05). More patients in non-overweight group achieved alanine aminotransferase normalization compared with those in overweight group (χ² = 11.036, P < 0.01). In non-overweight patients, the eGFR significantly declined in the 1^st year (P < 0.01), then remained at a relatively lower level. TG significantly declined in the 2^nd year (P = 0.02) and increased in the 3^rd year. Moreover, TG was negatively correlated with GFR at the four-time points (P = 0.002, 0.030, 0.007, 0.008, respectively). In overweight patients, eGFR and TG remained relatively stable during the 3-year treatment, and eGFR showed no significant relationship with TG. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that age [P < 0.01, 95%CI (0.97-1.005)] and baseline eGFR [P < 0.01, 95%CI (5.056-33.668)] were independent risk factors for eGFR < 90 mL/(min·1.73 m²) at the 3^rd year.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic changes in renal function were conversely related to TG during TDF treatment in patients with CHB and normal BMI, but not with overweight.

Tenofovir alafenamide is associated with improved alanine aminotransferase and renal safety compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a novel prodrug of tenofovir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. We aimed to evaluate the impact of switching to TAF on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization and renal safety. We also described the indications of switching to TAF. Consecutive adult CHB patients switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) dominant therapy to TAF for more than 12 months were identified retrospectively. A subgroup of patients newly switched to TAF was prospectively invited to perform transient elastography examination and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The time of switching to TAF was defined as baseline. Among 393 patients in the retrospective cohort, the median ALT at month 12 was significantly lower (21.0 [16.0-29.9] U/L vs. 25.0 [19.0-34.0] U/L; p < 0.001) and ALT normalization rate was higher (89.9% vs. 83.7%; p = 0.037) than those at baseline. Estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased from 12 months before baseline and then increased from baseline to month 12 significantly (69.7 ± 22.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 68.5 ± 21.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 69.2 ± 21.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 , p = 0.002 (-12 m vs. baseline), p = 0.004 (baseline vs. 12 m)). In the prospective cohort, 103 patients switched to TAF because of age > 60 years (63.1%), bone diseases (54.4%), and renal alteration (42.7%). TAF is associated with ALT improvement and better renal safety than TDF dominant therapy in CHB patients. Most CHB patients switched to TAF because of advanced age, followed by bone disease and renal alteration.

Renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir in liver transplant patients: a nationwide Korean registry study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) have been recommended after liver transplantation to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B virus infection. Despite its proven efficacy, the renal safety of TDF has not been established in liver transplant recipients. We aimed to compare the effects of TDF and ETV on renal function in liver transplant recipients and to evaluate risk factors for renal dysfunction after liver transplantation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational multicenter study of data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry. We included adults who underwent liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus-related complications from April 2014 to December 2017 and received TDF or ETV post-transplantation. Renal dysfunction was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate decline by at least 20% from baseline (1 month post-transplantation). Median duration of follow-up was 29 months (interquartile range 19-42).

RESULTS

A total of 804 liver transplant patients were included. The cumulative probability of renal dysfunction was significantly higher in the TDF group than in the ETV group. Multivariable analysis confirmed that TDF was independently associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction (hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.92; p = 0.005). Independent risk factors for renal dysfunction included older age, worse baseline renal function, and low body mass index. Overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with renal dysfunction than in those without.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide study, the use of TDF was associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction, when compared with ETV.

Lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with tenofovir than entecavir treatment in subsets of chronic hepatitis B patients: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Previous smaller meta-analyses comparing the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus entecavir (ETV) provided controversial results. This updated meta-analysis aimed to reliably identify any difference in the HCC incidence between TDF-treated or ETV-treated CHB patients in general or in specific subgroups.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies with hazard ratios (HRs) for HCC between TDF-treated and ETV-treated CHB patients. Retrieved dates ranged from January 2009 to October 2021. HRs with or without adjustment were pooled with random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-four comparative studies involving 37 771 CHB patients treated with TDF and 72 094 treated with ETV were included. TDF was associated with lower risk of HCC compared with ETV, with pooled unadjusted HR of 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.86) (24 studies) and adjusted HR of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.91) (21 studies). In propensity score matching cohorts, the TDF superiority was confirmed for unadjusted HR 0.83 (95% CI: 0.71-0.97) (14 studies) and was close to significance for adjusted HR (0.78, 95% CI: 0.58-1.04) (8 studies). Subgroup analyses showed that TDF was associated with lower HCC risk than ETV treatment in CHB patients who were from Asia (adjusted HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.87; 15 studies) or nucleos(t)ide naïve (adjusted HR:0.74, 95% CI: 0.65-0.84; 18 studies).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence from a sizable population suggests that TDF is associated with significantly lower HCC risk compared with ETV treatment in patients who are from Asia and/or nucleos(t)ide naïve.

Higher risk of kidney function decline with entecavir than tenofovir alafenamide in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are the preferred agents in patients with predisposing factors for nephrotoxicity, but no studies to date have directly compared the renal safety of the two antiviral agents. Hence, we compared the risk of kidney function decline among patients with treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treated with ETV or TAF.

METHODS

This study included 1988 patients with treatment-naïve CHB who were treated with ETV (n = 1839) or TAF (n = 149) between 2007 and 2020 for ETV and between 2017 and 2020 for TAF. The primary outcome was chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, defined as an increase in CKD stage by at least one stage for at least three consecutive months.

RESULTS

A 1:1 propensity score match yielded 149 patients in each treatment group. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 100.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 101.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the ETV and TAF groups respectively. A total of 61 patients developed a progression in CKD stage ≥ 1, of which 47 and 14 patients were from the ETV- and TAF-treated groups respectively (19.9 vs. 5.1 per 1000 person-years; p < .001). The risk of progression in CKD stage ≥1 was significantly higher in patients treated with ETV, even when adjusted for potential confounders (adjusted hazard ratio 4.05; 95% CI 2.14-7.68; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ETV was associated with a higher risk of kidney function decline than TAF in patients with treatment-naïve CHB. Therefore, further prospective randomized studies are needed.

Comparison of Renal Function Between Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Other Nucleos(t)ide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Patients With Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Background

Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) have become a standard treatment for both HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has been associated with kidney injury and possible long-term damage in patients with HIV. Few studies have examined whether this holds true for patients treated for HBV.

Methods

Data were gathered from the Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse between July 1, 2005 and July 31, 2015. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with HBV infection and prescribed a NRTI for > 1 month were included in the study and followed for 36 months. Patients with HIV infection were excluded, and patients treated with combination TDF/emtricitabine were analyzed separately from patients receiving only TDF. A linear mixed model was used to examine the effects of time and specific agent on renal function, which was measured with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at various time intervals.

Results

There were 413 incidences of NRTI use in 308 subjects during the 10 years of the study with 39 cases of TDF use. There was a significant fixed effect of time, with eGFR reduction of 4.6 mL/min (P < .001) over the course of the study for the full cohort, but the effects of each medication were not significant.

Conclusions

This multicenter, retrospective study did not demonstrate an association between TDF use and a greater degree of kidney injury compared with other NRTIs in patients with HBV, but further studies are warranted.

Evaluating the renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in hepatitis B patients without chronic kidney disease

The nephrotoxicity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients without chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate nephrotoxicity of TDF in this population. In this hospital-based cohort study, CHB patients who received either TDF or entecavir (ETV) therapy, and did not have underlying CKD, were retrospectively recruited from January, 2008 to January, 2019. After excluding those with confounding conditions, 257 TDF-treated patients were matched through propensity scores with 514 ETV-treated patients. Cumulative incidences of, and hazard ratios (HRs) for the CKD guideline-defined renal dysfunction, were analysed. The mean decline in glomerular filtration rate was similar over 60 months (TDF vs. ETV: 10.1 ml/min/1.73 m² , 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.4-12.7 vs. 8.0 ml/min/1.73 m² , 95% CI: 6.4-9.6; p = .34). The 5-year cumulative incidence of renal dysfunction was not significantly different (TDF vs. ETV: 10.4%, 95% CI: 5.6-18.0 vs. 5.8%, 95% CI: 3.6-9.0; p = .18). However, in multivariable stratified analysis, TDF was associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction in the elderly (age ≥60 years), when compared to ETV (HR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.02-8.01; p < .05). For confirming the effect of TDF amongst the elderly, 61 TDF-treated patients were further matched with 183 ETV-treated patients, with 5-year cumulative incidence of renal dysfunction being significantly higher in TDF users (TDF vs. ETV: 34.4%, 95% CI: 17.7-59.8 vs. 15.5%, 95% CI: 9.4-25.1; p < .05). TDF use was independently related to renal dysfunction (HR 2.71, 95% CI: 1.19-6.14; p < .05). Although TDF is generally safe for CHB patients without CKD, it is best to be avoided in the elderly.

Entecavir vs Tenofovir in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention in Chronic Hepatitis B Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are recommended as first-line therapies for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Although both drugs reduce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk, their comparative effectiveness remains controversial. We aimed to determine whether TDF is superior to ETV in preventing HCC.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral load, liver and renal function in adults treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs. untreated: a retrospective longitudinal UK cohort study

BACKGROUND

Current clinical guidelines recommend treating chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a minority of cases, but there are relatively scarce data on evolution or progression of liver inflammation and fibrosis in cases of chronic HBV (CHB) that do not meet treatment criteria. We aimed to assess the impact of TDF on liver disease, and the risk of renal impairment in treated CHB patients in comparison to untreated patients.

METHODS

We studied a longitudinal ethnically diverse CHB cohort in the UK attending out-patient clinics between 2005 and 2018. We examined TDF treatment (vs. untreated) as the main exposure, with HBV DNA viral load (VL), ALT, elastography scores and eGFR as the main outcomes, using paired tests and mixed effects model for longitudinal measurements. Additionally, decline of eGFR during follow-up was quantified within individuals by thresholds based on clinical guidelines. Baseline was defined as treatment initiation for TDF group and the beginning of clinical follow-up for untreated group respectively.

RESULTS

We included 206 adults (60 on TDF, 146 untreated), with a median ± IQR follow-up duration of 3.3 ± 2.8 years. The TDF group was significantly older (median age 39 vs. 35 years, p = 0.004) and more likely to be male (63% vs. 47%, p = 0.04) compared to the untreated group. Baseline difference between TDF and untreated groups reflected treatment eligibility criteria. As expected, VL and ALT declined significantly over time in TDF-treated patients. Elastography scores normalised during treatment in the TDF group reflecting regression of inflammation and/or fibrosis. However, 6/81 (7.4%) of untreated patients had a progression of fibrosis stage from F0-F1 to F2 or F3. There was no evidence of difference in rates or incidence of renal impairment during follow-up in the TDF vs. untreated group.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of liver inflammation and fibrosis may be raised in untreated patients compared to those receiving TDF, and TDF may benefit a larger percentage of the CHB population.

INASL-ISN Joint Position Statements on Management of Patients with Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Disease

Renal dysfunction is very common among patients with chronic liver disease, and concomitant liver disease can occur among patients with chronic kidney disease. The spectrum of clinical presentation and underlying etiology is wide when concomitant kidney and liver disease occur in the same patient. Management of these patients with dual onslaught is challenging and requires a team approach of hepatologists and nephrologists. No recent guidelines exist on algorithmic approach toward diagnosis and management of these challenging patients. The Indian National Association for Study of Liver (INASL) in association with Indian Society of Nephrology (ISN) endeavored to develop joint guidelines on diagnosis and management of patients who have simultaneous liver and kidney disease. For generating these guidelines, an INASL-ISN Taskforce was constituted, which had members from both the societies. The taskforce first identified contentious issues on various aspects of simultaneous liver and kidney diseases, which were allotted to individual members of the taskforce who reviewed them in detail. A round-table meeting of the Taskforce was held on 20-21 October 2018 at New Delhi to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. The evidence and recommendations in these guidelines have been graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system with minor modifications. The strength of recommendations (strong and weak) thus reflects the quality (grade) of underlying evidence (I, II, III). We present here the INASL-ISN Joint Position Statements on Management of Patients with Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Disease.

Treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or entecavir in chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients with renal impairment: results from a 7-year, multicentre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) safety and effectiveness in chronic hepatitis B virus-infected (CHB) patients with renal impairment (RI).

AIMS

To compare real-world data on renal safety and effectiveness of TDF vs entecavir (ETV) in CHB patients with moderate-to-severe RI.

METHODS

Retrospective, non-interventional, cohort study analysing medical records for TDF/ETV-treated CHB patients (54 European centres). Included patients experienced moderate-to-severe RI (creatinine clearance 20-60 mL/min [Cockcroft-Gault]) either before TDF/ETV initiation ('before' subgroup [baseline = treatment initiation]) or after TDF/ETV initiation ('after' subgroup [baseline = first RI occurrence]). The primary objective was TDF safety, particularly renal-related adverse events of special interest (AESI). TDF and ETV safety and effectiveness were compared and multivariate analyses were performed using inverse probability treatment weighting.

RESULTS

'Before' subgroup included 107 TDF- and 91 ETV-treated patients; 'after' subgroup included 212 TDF- and 77 ETV-treated patients. Mean baseline creatinine clearance was higher for TDF- vs ETV-treated patients (both subgroups). Median follow-up was 3.1 years (both treatments). AESI were more frequent with TDF vs ETV ('before': 18.7% vs 8.8%; 'after': 9.9% vs 3.9%); however, differences were not significant by multivariate analysis. Only TDF-treated patients experienced renal tubular dysfunction (6.5% 'before'; 1.9% 'after') as well as renal adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (8.4% 'before'; 7.1% 'after'). Effectiveness was similar between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall safety was similar for TDF vs ETV (both subgroups). Given that renal tubular dysfunction occurred with TDF and not with ETV, renal safety concerns may be greater with TDF in CHB patients with RI.

Tenofovir Versus Entecavir for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention in an International Consortium of Chronic Hepatitis B

INTRODUCTION

It is unclear whether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) differ in their effectiveness for preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed an international consortium that encompassed 19 centers from 6 countries or regions composed of previously untreated CHB patients then treated with either ETV or TDF monotherapy. Those who developed HCC before antiviral treatment or within 1 year of therapy were excluded. The association between antiviral regimen and HCC risk was evaluated using competing-risk survival regression. We also applied propensity score matching (PSM) to 1:1 balance the 2 treatment cohorts. A total of 5,537 patients were eligible (n = 4,837 received ETV and n = 700 received TDF) and observed for HCC occurrence until December 23, 2018. Before PSM, the TDF cohort was significantly younger and had generally less advanced diseases.

RESULTS

In the unadjusted analysis, TDF was associated with a lower risk of HCC (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.79; P = 0.005). The multivariable analysis, however, found that the association between TDF and HCC no longer existed (SHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.42-1.56; P = 0.52) after adjustment for age, sex, country, albumin, platelet, α-fetoprotein, cirrhosis, and diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the PSM analysis (n = 1,040) found no between-cohort differences in HCC incidences (P = 0.51) and no association between regimens (TDF or ETV) and HCC risk in the multivariable-adjusted analysis (adjusted SHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.92; P = 0.77).

DISCUSSION

TDF and ETV did not significantly differ in the prevention of HCC in patients with CHB.

Entecavir treatment of hepatitis B virus-infected patients with severe renal impairment and those on hemodialysis

AIM

Entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are first-line nucleos(t)ide analogues for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients. However, consecutive TDF treatment causes renal dysfunction, and the safety and efficacy of TAF have not been established in severe renal dysfunction patients, including hemodialysis patients. The efficacy and safety of ETV in these populations has not been clarified. The study aimed to clarify this.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, between 2006 and 2018, a total of 567 HBV-infected patients treated with ETV monotherapy were screened. Patients were included if >20 years old, treated with ETV monotherapy for >1 year, and had proper clinical information. The efficacy of ETV and changes in renal function were evaluated according to renal function.

RESULTS

A total of 273 patients were included: 9.2% (25/273), 1.8% (5/273), and 3.7% (10/273) had chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage G3, CKD stage G4/5, and were on hemodialysis, respectively. Overall, 84.2%, 94.0%, and 96.2% of patients experienced serum HBV-DNA disappearance at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, after treatment initiation. In patients with CKD stage G3-5, estimated glomerular filtration rate tended to restore with time, which was in contrast to patients without renal dysfunction. The rate of disappearance in serum HBV-DNA, alanine transaminase normalization, and virological breakthrough was similar between patients with or without renal dysfunction. ETV showed high efficacy for all 10 hemodialysis patients without virological breakthrough.

CONCLUSIONS

Entecavir for HBV-infected patients with severe renal dysfunction, including hemodialysis patients, is highly effective and does not affect renal function.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A 2-year prospective study

To date, a small number of studies concerning the effects and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in Chinese individuals were conducted. In this study, we aimed to assess the antiviral effects and nephrotoxicity of TDF in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.Patients with chronic HBV infection were prospectively recruited and TDF treatment was given for 96 weeks. HBV serologic markers, HBV DNA, creatinine and phosphorus were collected.Fifty-seven treatment-naïve and 48 treatment-experienced patients were recruited. Irrespective of the prior treatment history, more than 95% of patients achieved virological response during 96 weeks treatment with TDF. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) significantly declined in the first year of treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B or younger age (<65 years old) (both P < .05), while that was not achieved in patients with liver cirrhosis or older age (≥65 years old) (both P > .05). For patients who were treatment-naïve or treated previously with adefovir dipivoxil, eGFR declined at the 48th week; however, eGFR was partially recovered at the 96th week. Furthermore, multivariable analysis showed that basal eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m (P = .001; odds ratio: 4.821; 95% confidence interval: 1.904-12.206) is the only independent risk factor for eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m at the 96th week.TDF has potent antiviral effect in both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients.

Changes in Renal Function in Patients With Chronic HBV Infection Treated With Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate vs Entecavir

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It is unclear whether drugs used to treat chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection cause significant renal impairment. We compare adjusted mean estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR; mL/min/1.73 m²) of patients with chronic HBV infection treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs patients treated with entecavir.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients with chronic HBV infections treated with TDF (n = 239) or entecavir (n = 171), from 2000 through 2016, followed for a mean time of 43-46 months. Levels of serum creatinine were measured ≥12 months while patients received treatment. Patients did not have prior exposure to adefovir or HCV, HDV, or HIV co-infection. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) for age, sex, presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, baseline eGFR, cirrhosis, and follow-up duration. We performed multivariate generalized linear modeling, adjusting for cirrhosis, diabetes, and hypertension, to estimate adjusted mean eGFR for matched and unmatched cohorts. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of renal impairment.

RESULTS

eGFRs were ≥60, after PSM, in 116 patients given entecavir and in 116 patients given TDF; eGFRs were <60 in 32 patients given entecavir and 26 patients given TDF. Multivariate generalized linear modeling of the unmatched overall and <60 eGFR cohorts revealed significantly lower adjusted mean eGFRs in patients given TDF (all P < .001). However, in the eGFR ≥60 PSM cohort, the adjusted mean eGFR was similar between patients receiving either treatment. In Cox regression analysis, TDF was not associated with mild or moderate renal impairment compared with entecavir.

CONCLUSION

In a retrospective study of patients with chronic HBV infections treated with TDF vs entecavir, we found that TDF was not associated with higher risk of worsening renal function during short- or intermediate-term follow-up periods, among patients without significant renal impairment. Additional studies, with longer follow-up periods, are needed because treatment for chronic HBV infection is generally long term or life-long. For patients with baseline renal impairment, significant renal decline was among patients given TDF compared to patients given entecavir.