Adverse drug reactions in neonates and infants: a population-tailored approach is needed

Assessment of severity and avoidability of adverse drug reactions in neonates: a reproducibility study of the Hartwig tool and LAAT

OBJECTIVE

Tools for classifying adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have not yet been validated in the context of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The study aims to investigate the inter-rater reliability of the Hartwig tool and the Liverpool avoidability assessment tool (LAAT) in assessing the severity and avoidability of ADR cases in hospitalized neonates.

METHODS

An observational and prospective study was conducted in the NICU of a maternity hospital in Natal, Brazil. The Hartwig tool and LAAT were employed to assess the severity and avoidability of ADRs, respectively. Three experienced clinical pharmacists independently assessed all ADR cases. Inter-rater reliability was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient (k) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Among 79 ADR cases, the mean gestational age was 29.7 ± 4.4 weeks, and the birth weight averaged 1446.0 ± 1179.3 g. The assessment of ADR severity using the Hartwig tool revealed a significant overall correlation (overall k = 0.573; 95% CI 0.395 to 0.753) with exact agreement (EA) and extreme disagreement (ED) rates between evaluators of 86.5% and 2.5%, respectively. However, no statistically significant correlation was observed for determining avoidability using the LAAT (overall k = 0.017; 95% CI - 0.048 to 0.082), with an EA rate of 83.6% and ED rate of 10.1%.

CONCLUSION

The Hartwig tool demonstrates good reproducibility among different evaluators in determining the severity of ADRs, unlike the LAAT for assessing avoidability.

Drug Safety During Breastfeeding: A Comparative Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reports and LactMed®

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

While breastfeeding is highly recommended, breastfed infants may be exposed to drugs by milk due to maternal pharmacotherapy, resulting in a risk of adverse drug events (ADE) or reactions (ADRs). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is an online pharmacovigilance database, while the Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®) includes accurate and evidence-based information on levels of substances in breast milk and infant blood, and possible ADRs in nursing infants. We aimed to explore the FAERS database and compare ADE/ADR information patterns between both databases.

METHODS

The FAERS database was explored (29 July 2024) for ADEs related to drug exposure during lactation to determine annual trends, infant outcomes, and regions of reporting. The active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) associated with these ADEs were categorized based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC, first level) classification. The top five APIs in each ATC group were explored in terms of the type of ADEs reported and compared to information in LactMed®.

RESULTS

In total, 2628 ADEs were obtained from the FAERS database, with increased reporting over time. In the FAERS database, 68.4% of the patients were under 2 months old, 5.5% had life threatening ADEs, and 3.6% died, while 84.70% of the cases were categorized as serious. Most ADEs were from North America (44.9%). Most drugs (50.9%) were nervous system drugs. The most frequent reported outcome was "other outcomes (without additional subdivision or information)" (58.2%), reflecting the diversity in outcomes reported. When related to the same drug, the FAERS database and LactMed® resource exhibited both similarities and differences in the types of reported ADE/ADR.

CONCLUSIONS

The FAERS database is a useful tool to detect potential ADEs (rather sensitive), without ADR assessment, while LactMed® provides guidance driven by relevant ADRs (rather specific). The FAERS database is useful to obtain exploratory information about ADEs during lactation to increase the knowledge about drug safety during breastfeeding and the awareness of the possible risks in nursing infants, while LactMed® translates all available information into guidance.

Drug related adverse event assessment in neonates in clinical trials and clinical care

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of drug-related adverse events is essential to fully understand the benefit-risk balance of any drug exposure, weighing efficacy versus safety. This is needed for both drug labeling and clinical decision-making. Assessment is based on seriousness, severity and causality, be it more difficult to apply in neonates. Adverse event detection or prevention in the neonatal clinical setting is also more complicated because of polypharmacy, and off-label or unlicensed pharmacotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

Tools became available to assess severity and causality of adverse events in neonates recruited in clinical trials. The first version of the Neonatal Adverse Event severity score (NAESS) reduced the inter-observer variability. Causality tools like the Naranjo score were also tailored to neonates. These tools are also instrumental to support proactive pharmacovigilance in clinical care, while multidisciplinary care teams and computerized pharmacovigilance using advanced data analysis, like machine learning are emerging approaches to develop effective decision strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

All stakeholders involved in development of medicines or its clinical use should be aware of the limitations of the currently available assessment tools. Extension and optimization of these tools, advanced data analysis approaches, and capturing the variability in time-dependent physiology are warranted to improve pharmacovigilance in neonates.

Adverse drug reactions in neonates: a brief analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

Introduction

Drug trials in neonates are scarce, and the neonates may consequently be at risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Spontaneous ADR reporting is an important tool for expanding the knowledge on drug safety in neonates. This study explores the quality of current neonatal ADR reports and the ADR reports of the most common drugs used in neonatal departments.

Methods

An observational cross-sectional study focused on neonates was conducted using data on spontaneous reports extracted from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) from the third quarter of 2014 up to December 2022. Only the primary suspect drugs given to neonates or subjects aged <30 days were included in the analysis.

Results

Spontaneous reports from 13 million patients of all ages, totaling 50 million ADRs, were evaluated. Information regarding the age was missing in 40% of the reports, and data on 43,737 neonates with 948 different suspected drugs were identified and included in the analysis. We report the frequency of spontaneous ADR reports in the FAERS database for the ten most frequently administered drugs in neonatal intensive care units in the USA.

Conclusion

Overall, neonatal ADRs are still underreported. The FAERS database in its current form discriminates insufficiently between prenatal and postnatal drug exposures. Hence, improved neonatal pharmacovigilance systems are urgently needed.

Treatment-related problems in neonates receiving parenteral nutrition: risk factors and implications for practice

OBJECTIVES

Parenteral nutrition (PN) can be associated with several treatment-related problems (TRPs) and complications in neonatal settings. Thus, understanding the extent and type of these problems and related factors is pivotal to prevent negative consequences of these preparations. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess factors affecting TRPs in neonatal patients receiving PN.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of neonates receiving PN in NICU and other wards. We collected their demographics, and laboratory workup. TRPs related to PN preparations as well as their pharmacotherapy were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Medical charts of 96 neonate were reviewed. The most encountered TRPs related to patients' pharmacotherapy were the lack of frequent monitoring (34.2%) and low dose (17.5%). For PN-related TPRs, a mismatch between patients' nutritional needs and PN composition was observed in third of the patients. Statistically significant positive correlations between number of medications during hospital stay and number of reported TRPs [(r = 0.275, p < 0.01) and (r = 0.532, p < 0.001)] were observed.

CONCLUSION

In neonates who receive parenteral nutrition (PN), TRPs are often observed. These problems primarily arise from issues in patients' pharmacotherapy, namely monitoring and dosing. Identifying the risk factors for these TRPs emphasizes the full and effective integration of clinical pharmacists into the healthcare team, which can serve as a potential preventive strategy to lower the occurrence of TRPs.

Temporal profile of adverse drug reactions and associated clinical factors: a prospective observational study in a neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

Although adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are quite common in hospitalised neonates, pharmacovigilance activities in this public are still incipient. This study aims to characterise ADRs in neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), identifying causative drugs, temporal profile and associated factors.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

NICU of a public maternity hospital in Natal/Brazil.

PARTICIPANTS

All neonates admitted to the NICU for more than 24 hours and using at least one medication were followed up during the time of hospitalisation.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence rate and risk factors for ADRs. The ADRs were detected by an active search in electronic medical records and analysis of spontaneous reports in the hospital pharmacovigilance system.

RESULTS

Six hundred neonates were included in the study, where 118 neonates had a total of 186 ADRs. The prevalence of ADRs at the NICU was 19.7% (95% CI 16.7% to 23.0%). The most common ADRs were tachycardia (30.6%), polyuria (9.1%) and hypokalaemia (8.6%). Tachycardia (peak incidence rate: 57.1 ADR/1000 neonates) and hyperthermia (19.1 ADR/1000 neonates) predominated during the first 5 days of hospitalisation. The incidence rate of polyuria and hypokalaemia increased markedly after the 20th day, with both reaching a peak of 120.0 ADR/1000 neonates. Longer hospitalisation time (OR 0.018, 95% CI 0.007 to 0.029; p<0.01) and number of prescribed drugs (OR 0.127, 95% CI 0.075 to 0.178; p<0.01) were factors associated with ADRs.

CONCLUSION

ADRs are very common in NICU, with tachycardia and hyperthermia predominant in the first week of hospitalisation and polyuria and hypokalaemia from the third week onwards.

Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions in neonates: a comparative study between Naranjo's algorithm and Du's tool

BACKGROUND

Algorithms for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are important in the management of adverse events, however, it is inconclusive which tool best suits pharmacovigilance in neonates.

AIM

To compare the performance of the algorithms of Du and Naranjo in determining causality in cases of ADRs in neonates in a NICU.

METHOD

This observational and prospective study was conducted in a NICU of a Brazilian maternity school between January 2019 and December 2020. Independently, three clinical pharmacists used the algorithms of Naranjo and Du in 79 cases of ADRs in 57 neonates. The algorithms were evaluated for inter-rater and inter-tool agreement using Cohen's kappa coefficient (k).

RESULTS

The Du algorithm showed greater ability to identify definite ADRs (≈ 60%), but had low reproducibility (overall k = 0.108; 95% CI 0.064-0.149). In contrast, the Naranjo algorithm showed a lower proportion of definite ADRs (< 4%), but had good reproducibility (overall k = 0.402; 95% CI 0.379-0.429). The tools showed no significant correlation regarding ADR causality classification (overall k = - 0.031; 95% CI - 0.049 to 0.065).

CONCLUSION

Although the Du algorithm has a lower reproducibility compared to the Naranjo, this tool showed good sensitivity for classifying ADRs as definite, proving to be a more suitable tool for neonatal clinical routine.

Comparison of Dosing Accuracy Between the ENFit LDT and a Neonatal-Specific ISO-Compliant Enteral Syringe

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the dosing accuracy of 2 female enteral syringe types for use in neonates.

METHODS

This was an in vitro study evaluating dosing accuracy of ENFit with low dose tip (LDT) and Nutrisafe2 (NS2) syringes. Acceptable dosing variance (DV) was +/- 10%. Outcomes included tests exceeding 10% DV and DV by syringe size, dispensing source, and intended dosing volume.

RESULTS

A total of 300 tests were performed (LDT = 150, NS2 = 150) with 3 syringe sizes (0.5, 1, 3 or 2.5 mL). Compared with NS2, LDT had significantly more tests with unacceptable DV (48% vs 4.7%, p < 0.0001) and higher absolute DV (11.9% vs 3.5%, p < 0.001). Dosing variance was inversely proportional to syringe size, where the smallest syringes were least accurate (0.5 mL LDT 16.1% vs 4.6%, p < 0.001). The largest syringes had acceptable DV (3 mL LDT 8.8% vs 2.5 mL NS2 3.3%, p < 0.001). Bulk bottle with adapters demonstrated a higher DV with LDT compared with NS2 (13.3% vs 3.9%, p < 0.001). Medication cups without adapters were associated with acceptable DV for both LDT and NS2 (9.7% vs 2.9%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Nutrisafe2 syringe has greater dosing accuracy as compared with ENFit LDT syringe. Smaller syringes are associated with greater dosing inaccuracy, but this effect was within acceptable DV for the NS2 syringe. Bulk bottle adapters did not improve the accuracy of the LDT. More clinical evaluations are needed to determine if the ENFit can be safely used in the neonatal population.

An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Support Detection of Neonatal Adverse Drug Reactions Based on Severity and Probability Scores: A New Risk Score as Web-Tool

BACKGROUND

Critically ill neonates are at greater risk for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The differentiation of ADRs from reactions associated with organ dysfunction/immaturity or genetic variability is difficult.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, each ADR was assessed using newborn-specific severity and probability scales by the clinical pharmacist. Subsequently, a machine learning-based risk score was designed to predict ADR presence in neonates.

RESULTS

In 98/412 (23.8%) of (56.3%; male) neonates included, 187 ADRs (0.42 ADR/patient) were determined related to 49 different drugs (37.12%). Drugs identified as high risk were enoxaparin, dexmedetomidine, vinblastine, dornase alfa, etoposide/carboplatin and prednisolone. The independent variables included in the risk score to predict ADR presence, according to the random forest importance criterion, were: systemic hormones (2 points), cardiovascular drugs (3 points), diseases of the circulatory system (1 point), nervous system drugs (1 point), and parenteral nutrition treatment (1 point), (cut-off value: 3 points). This risk score correctly classified 91.1% of the observations in the test set (c-index: 0.914).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the high-performing risk score specific to neonates, it is expected that high-risk neonatal ADRs can be determined and prevented before they occur. Moreover, the awareness of clinicians of these drugs can be improved with this web-tool, and mitigation strategies (change of drug, dose, treatment duration, etc.) can be considered, based on a benefit-harm relationship for suspected drugs with a newborn-centered approach.

Adverse Drug Reactions at Nonelective Hospital Admission in Children and Adolescents: Comparison of 4 Causality Assessment Methods

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare assessment methods to determine adverse drug reactions (ADRs) at nonelective hospital admission in pediatric patients, to investigate the interrater reliability of assessment methods in pediatric care, and to analyze symptoms related to ADRs and (suicidal) drug intoxications.

METHODS

For 1 year, the medical records of nonelective patients admitted to a university pediatric department were evaluated for potential ADRs using 4 assessments methods by 1 experienced rater. Krippendorff α was calculated from a sample of 14 patients evaluated by 4 experienced raters to determine interrater reliability.

RESULTS

In 1831 nonelective hospital admissions, 63.4% (1161 of 1831) of patients had received at least one drug before admission. We found a potential causal relationship between drugs and symptoms documented at admission and thus potential ADRs according to Naranjo in 23.3% (271 of 1161) of those patients, World Health Organization - Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) in 22.5% (261 of 1161), Koh in 21.7% (252 of 1161), and Begaud in 16.5% (192 of 1161). The probability rating of the potential causal relationships varied considerably between the methods (Naranjo-Begaud, P < 0.01; Naranjo-Koh, P < 0.001; Koh-Begaud, P < 0.01; Begaud-WHO-UMC, P < 0.01). Acceptable interrater reliability (α ≥ 0.667) was only obtained for WHO-UMC (α = 0.7092). The most frequently identified definite ADR was sedation in 1.5% of all nonelective patients with medication before hospital admission. In 1.2% (22 of 1831) of all nonelective admissions, we found drug intoxications with suicidal intent.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment methods showed a high variability in the determination of a potential causal relationship between drug and documented symptom, in the classification of the probability of ADRs, and suboptimal interrater reliability. Thus, their feasibility in pediatric patients is limited.

Species differences between mouse and human PPARα in modulating the hepatocarcinogenic effects of perinatal exposure to a high-affinity human PPARα agonist in mice

Evidence suggests that species differences exist between rodents and humans in their biological responses to ligand activation of PPARα. Moreover, neonatal/postnatal rodents may be more sensitive to the effects of activating PPARα. Thus, the present studies examined the effects of chronic ligand activation of PPARα initiated during early neonatal development and continued into adulthood on hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. Wild-type, Ppara-null, or PPARA-humanized mice were administered a potent, high affinity human PPARα agonist GW7647, and cohorts of mice were examined over time. Activation of PPARα with GW7647 increased expression of known PPARα target genes in liver and was associated with hepatomegaly, increased hepatic cytotoxicity and necrosis, increased expression of hepatic MYC, and a high incidence of hepatocarcinogenesis in wild-type mice. These effects did not occur or were largely diminished in Ppara-null and PPARA-humanized mice, although background levels of hepatocarcinogenesis were also noted in both Ppara-null and PPARA-humanized mice. More fatty change (steatosis) was also observed in both Ppara-null and PPARA-humanized mice independent of GW7647 administration. Results from these studies indicate that the mouse PPARα is required to mediate hepatocarcinogenesis induced by GW7647 in mice and that activation of the human PPARα with GW7647 in PPARA-humanized mice are diminished compared to wild-type mice. Ppara-null and PPARA-humanized mice are valuable tools for examining species differences in the mechanisms of PPARα-induced hepatocarcinogenesis, but background levels of liver cancer observed in aged Ppara-null and PPARA-humanized mice must be considered when interpreting results from studies that use these models. These results also demonstrate that early life exposure to a potent human PPARα agonist does not enhance sensitivity to hepatocarcinogenesis.

Methods for the detection of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized children: a systematic review

Introduction: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are a problem for healthcare systems worldwide. Pediatric patients constitute a vulnerable group with regard to ADRs. However, although pediatric patients are at increased risk for these reactions, there is little progress on ADR detection methods in this group.Areas covered: In this systematic search, performed according to PRISMA statements, we selected studies, published in PubMed/Medline databases; Scopus; LILACS; Web of Science; Embase and Cochrane Library until April, 2020, on ADRs in hospitalized pediatric patients.Expert opinion: The increase of pediatric drug safety data is essential to the improvement of childcare. Health services must continuously stimulate educational programs focused on ADR detection tools to minimize the barriers and raise awareness among professionals. Therefore, it is necessary to consider that each method has advantages and disadvantages and must be analyzed in detail to be implemented according to the peculiarities of each practice scenario. Triggers tools (active method) correlated with electronic medical notes seems a good strategy for ADR identification, whether pediatric parameters are well checked and adapted with each age group. In any event, combined methods will add data to identification and clearer ADR assessment.

Dose-Related Adverse Drug Events in Neonates: Recognition and Assessment

The efficacy and safety of a drug is dose or exposure related, and both are used to assess the benefit-risk balance of a given drug and ultimately to decide on the specific drug license, including its dose and indication(s). Unfortunately, both efficacy and safety are much more difficult to establish in neonates, resulting in very few drugs licensed for use in this vulnerable population. This review will focus on dose-related adverse events in neonates. Besides the regulatory classification on seriousness, adverse event assessment includes aspects related to signal detection, causality, and severity. Disentangling confounders from truly dose-related adverse drug events remains a major challenge, as illustrated for drug-induced renal impairment, drug-induced liver injury, and neurodevelopmental outcome. Causality assessment, using either routine tools (Naranjo algorithm, World Health Organization's Uppsala Monitoring Center causality tool) or a Naranjo algorithm tailored to neonates, still does not sufficiently and reliably document causality in neonates. Finally, very recently, a first neonatal severity-grading tool for neonates has been developed. Following the development of advanced pharmacokinetic approaches and techniques to predict and assess drug exposure, additional efforts are needed to truly and fully assess dose adverse drug events. To further operationalize the recently developed tools on causality and severity, reference databases on a palette of biomarkers and outcome variables and their covariates are an obvious next step. These databases should subsequently be integrated in modeling efforts to truly explore safety outcome, including aspects associated with or caused by drug dose or exposure.

Precision Dosing of Doxapram in Preterm Infants Using Continuous Pharmacodynamic Data and Model-Based Pharmacokinetics: An Illustrative Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Current drug dosing in preterm infants is standardized, mostly based on bodyweight. Still, covariates such as gestational and postnatal age may importantly alter pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Evaluation of drug therapy in these patients is very difficult because objective pharmacodynamic parameters are generally lacking. By integrating continuous physiological data with model-based drug exposure and data on adverse drug reactions (ADRs), we aimed to show the potential benefit for optimized individual pharmacotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Continuous data on oxygen saturation (SpO2), fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) and composite parameters, including the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and the cumulative oxygen shortage under the 89% SpO2 limit, served as indicators for doxapram effectiveness. We analyzed these continuous effect data, integrated with doxapram exposure and ADR parameters, obtained in preterm infants around the start of doxapram therapy. The exposures to doxapram and the active metabolite keto-doxapram were simulated using a population pharmacokinetic model. Infants were selected and retrospectively compared on the indication to start doxapram, the first response to doxapram, a potential dose-response relationship, and the administered dosage over time. Recommendations were made for individual improvements of therapy.

RESULTS

We provide eight cases of continuous doxapram administration that illustrate a correct and incorrect indication to start doxapram, responders and non-responders to therapy, and unnecessary over-exposure with ADRs. Recommendations for improvement of therapy include: objective evaluation of added effect of doxapram after start, prevention of overdosing by earlier down-titration or termination of therapy, and the prevention of hypoxia and agitation by measuring specific parameters at strategical time-points.

CONCLUSION

Real-time and non-invasive effect monitoring of drug therapy combined with model-based exposure provides relevant information to clinicians and can importantly improve therapy. The variability between and within patients emphasizes the importance of individual, objective evaluation of pharmacotherapy. These measurements, together with data on ADRs, allow for precision medicine in neonatology that should be brought to the bedside.

Exploratory Findings of Prescribing Unlicensed and Off-Label Medicines Among Children and Neonates

Objective

A cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate the practice of unlicensed and off-label drug prescribing/dispensing in children and neonates by physicians and clinical pharmacists in the metropolitan city of Karachi.

Methods

The study was conducted for the duration of 5 months – November 2018 to March 2019 – in different clinics and tertiary care hospitals of Karachi, Pakistan. Respondents were interviewed by our researchers using 30 items questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the answers of respondents to survey items. Pearson correlation and independent sample t-test were employed to recognize the association between the responses of participants and independent variables. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 421 questionnaires were completed by physicians and clinical pharmacists. The mean age of the study participants was 49.5 years. Around 98% of pharmacists and 93.5% of physicians were well conversant with the definition of unlicensed and off-label drugs. Around 68% of physicians and 77% of pharmacists reported that they were more concerned about the efficacy of such drugs as compared to that of licensed medicines in children. The most frequent off-label categories observed in the study were dose (65.21%) and indication (17.52%). A vast majority (>80%) thought that approving new drugs by regulatory authorities will drop the occurrence of medication errors due to incorrect dosing. The British National Formulary (BNF) for children was used as the best reliable source of information among respondents.

Conclusion

The present study highlighted the common practice of unlicensed and off-label drug prescribing in pediatrics; however, respondents showed their concern towards decreasing such practice and are likely to welcome initiatives intended to assure medication safety in children.

Improving Recognition and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Project

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are under-recognized and under-reported in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) population, with up to 95% of all ADRs not reported. Compared with non-elderly adults, pediatric patients are 3 times more likely to experience an ADR, with varying rates from 0.6% to 16.8%. The Children’s Mercy NICU has an ADR rate of 0.29% (2015). This high rate presents an opportunity to increase recognition and reporting, and improve characterization of ADRs in the NICU.

Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of the knowledge, management and reporting ADR in paediatrics by healthcare teams (QUESA-P)

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop and validate a new instrument called Questionnaire for the assessment of the knowledge, management and reporting ADR in Paediatrics by Healthcare teams (QUESA-P).

DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Teams of healthcare professionals (HCP) that lead with pharmacological therapy in Paediatrician's sector (Paediatric-HCP) in seven public hospitals in Brazil.

OUTCOME

An assessment of the knowledge and current management of ADR in Paediatric-HCP.

METHODS

We developed and validated QUESA-P, using a standardised procedure which included item development and psychometric prevalidation using Cronbach's Alpha, item-total correlation and test-retest validity for internal consistency and reliability. External criterion was used as criterion validation (the instrument was applied to the focus group expert vs focus group team of Paediatric-HCP in hospitals). The focus group of experts who participated in psychometrics was asked to respond to the QUESA-P twice in order to assess test-retest reliability. The content validity of the initial questionnaire was assessed by the Delphi method and pilot test. Subsequently, we made minor revisions and finalized the QUESA-P RESULTS: Selection of domains and facets were based on literature review made in duplicate by authors. Content validity was done by trial of different examiners (panellists, n=16), conducting analysis through Delphi method (three rounds). The QUESA-P was constructed with three domains. The intraclass correlations (0.80) and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.82), indicated adequate test-retest reliability and internal consistency for each domain. The application of the QUESA to 61 Paediatric-HCP in hospital resulted in lower mean score of 42.1 ± 3.4 in all domains when compared with expert teams (n= 46) 48.2 ± 3.7 (p <0.001) indicating that the instrument is valid to discriminate QUESA experts and Paediatric-HCP.

CONCLUSION

The selected domains can be used to check weaknesses in the identification, management and reporting of suspected ADR by Paediatric-HCP in Brazil.

Risk assessment of patient factors and medications for drug-related problems from a prospective longitudinal study of newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit in Brazil

OBJECTIVE

To identify patient factors and medications associated with the occurrence of drug-related problems (DRPs) in neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

DESIGN

Prospective, longitudinal study.

SETTING

NICU of a teaching hospital in Brazil.

PARTICIPANTS

Data were collected from the records of the clinical pharmacy service of all neonates admitted between April 2014 and January 2017, excluding neonates with length of stay in the NICU <24 hours or without prescribed drugs.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Occurrence of one or more DRP (conditions interfering in the patient's pharmacotherapy with potential undesired clinical outcomes).

RESULTS

The study observed 600 neonates who had a median length of stay in the NICU of 13 days (range 2-278 days). DRPs were identified in most neonates (60.5%). In a multivariate logistic regression model, the factors independently associated with DRP were gestational age (adjusted OR (AOR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.89), 5 min Apgar <7 (AOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.13), neurological disease (AOR 2.49, 95% CI 1.09 to 5.69), renal disease (AOR 5.75, 95% CI 1.85 to 17.8) and cardiac disease (AOR 2.36, 95% CI 1.31 to 4.24). The medications with greater risk for DRP were amphotericin B (AOR 4.80), meropenem (AOR 4.09), alprostadil (AOR 3.38), vancomycin (AOR 3.34), ciprofloxacin (AOR 3.03), gentamicin (AOR 2.43), cefepime (AOR 1.88), amikacin (AOR 1.82) and omeprazole (AOR 1.66). These medicines represented one-third of all prescribed drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational age, 5 min Apgar <7, and neurological, cardiac and renal diseases are risk factors for DRP in NICUs. Alprostadil, omeprazole and several anti-infectives were associated with greater risk of DRP.

Drug related problems in the neonatal intensive care unit: incidence, characterization and clinical relevance

BACKGROUND

Any event involving drug therapy that may interfere in a patient's desired clinical outcome is called a drug related problem (DRP). DRP are very common in intensive therapy, however, little is known about DRP in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of DRPs in NICU patients and to characterize DRPs according to type, cause and corresponding pharmaceutical conducts.

METHODS

Prospective observational study conducted in the NICU at a teaching hospital in Brazil from January 2014 to November 2016. The data were collected from the records of the clinical pharmacy service, excluding neonates admitted for less than 24 h and those who had no drugs prescribed. DRPs were classified according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe system and evaluated for relevance-safety.

RESULTS

Six hundred neonates were included in the study, with mean gestational age of 31.9 ± 4.1 weeks and mean birth weight of 1779 ± 885 g. The incidence of DRPs in the NICU was 6.8% patient-days (95%CI 6.2-7.3%) and affected 59.8% of neonates (95% CI 55.8-63.8%). Sub-optimal effect (52.8%) and inappropriate dose selection (39.75%) were the most common problem and cause, respectively. Anti-infectives was the medication class most involved in DRPs. More than one-third of neonates were exposed to DRP of significant or high safety-relevance. Most of the pharmaceutical interventions were related with drug prescription, with over 90% acceptance by attending physicians.

CONCLUSION

DRP are common in NICU, predominating problems of sub-optimal treatment, mainly due to inappropriate dose selection.

Local pulmonary drug delivery in the preterm rabbit: feasibility and efficacy of daily intratracheal injections

Recent clinical trials in newborns have successfully used surfactant as a drug carrier for an active compound, to minimize systemic exposure. To investigate the translational potential of surfactant-compound mixtures and other local therapeutics, a relevant animal model is required in which intratracheal administration for maximal local deposition is technically possible and well tolerated. Preterm rabbit pups (born at 28 days of gestation) were exposed to either hyperoxia or normoxia and randomized to receive daily intratracheal surfactant, daily intratracheal saline, or no injections for 7 days. At day 7, the overall lung function and morphology were assessed. Efficacy in terms of distribution was assessed by micro-PET-CT on both day 0 and day 7. Lung function as well as parenchymal and vascular structure were altered by hyperoxia, thereby reproducing a phenotype reminiscent of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Neither intratracheal surfactant nor saline affected the survival or the hyperoxia-induced BPD phenotype of the pups. Using PET-CT, we demonstrate that 82.5% of the injected radioactive tracer goes and remains in the lungs, with a decrease of only 4% after 150 min. Surfactant and saline can safely and effectively be administered in spontaneously breathing preterm rabbits. The described model and method enable researchers to evaluate intratracheal pharmacological interventions for the treatment of BPD.

Ranitidine-induced Thrombocytopenia in a Neonate - A Case Report and Review of Literature

Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150 × 10⁹/L) regularly occurs in newborns but is especially observed in critically ill neonates. We describe the case of a small for gestational age (SGA) neonate, who showed an unexpected, severe thrombocytopenia (8 × 10⁹/L) at day 5 of life. The thrombocytopenia recovered completely after cessation of ranitidine (0.5 mg/kg/6 hr), which was started in a context of feeding difficulties. Other causes of neonatal thrombocytopenia were ruled out. Besides a brief report on a cimetidine-induced thrombocytopenia over 25 years ago, no other neonatal or pediatric cases of H₂ antagonist-induced thrombocytopenia have been reported to date, although being widely used in routine care. Moreover, several adult cases have been published. In general, neonatal thrombocytopenia, although one of the most frequent hematological conditions in newborns, is only rarely attributed to an adverse drug reaction. Clinicians should be aware of the risks for adverse reactions, especially in routinely used drugs and in critically ill patients.

Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics to Better Understand Physiological Changes During Pregnancy and Neonatal Life

Pregnant women, fetuses, and newborns are particularly vulnerable patient populations. During pregnancy, the body is subject to physiological changes that influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs. Inappropriate dosing in pregnant women can result in sub-therapeutic or toxic effects, putting not only the pregnant woman but also her fetus at risk. During neonatal life, maturation processes also affect pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs. Inappropriate dosing in newborns leads not only to short-term complications but can also have a negative impact on the long-term development of infants and children. For these reasons, it is crucial to characterize physiological changes in pregnant women, describe placental transfer kinetics of drugs, and describe physiological changes related to the transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life and maturation processes in preterm and term neonates. Quantitative pharmacological approaches such as pharmacometric and physiologically-based modeling and model-based simulations can be useful to better understand and predict such physiological changes and their effects on drug exposure and response. This review article (1) gives an overview of physiological changes in pregnant women, their fetuses, and (pre)term neonates, (2) presents case studies to illustrate applications of new modeling and simulation approaches, and (3) discusses challenges and opportunities in optimizing and personalizing treatments during pregnancy and neonatal life.

Paediatric extrapolation: A necessary paradigm shift

Legislative initiatives have been successful in increasing the availability of approved therapies for paediatric patients. However, additional measures to ensure the timely completion of paediatric studies are necessary to further increase the number of medicines available to children. Over the last 3 years, international experts convened to revise the ICH E11 guideline on clinical investigations of medicinal products in paediatric populations to harmonize approaches to paediatric extrapolation, striving to reduce substantial differences between regions in the acceptance of data for global paediatric medicine development programmes. Several areas of therapeutics development in children, such as human immunodeficiency virus and partial-onset seizures, have been streamlined and require fewer children enrolled in clinical trials because of the appropriate application of paediatric extrapolation. Based on this experience, it is clear that for paediatric extrapolation strategies to reach their full potential there is the need to understand the quality and quantity of data, often collected in adult patients, that will inform the appropriateness of the use of paediatric extrapolation, as well as to identify gaps in knowledge with respect to disease pathophysiology, organ maturation or drug target ontogeny. The generation of information that enhances our current understanding of these gaps in knowledge can further decrease the need for larger, paediatric clinical trials and can increase the efficiency of paediatric therapeutics development as well as protect children from participation in unnecessary studies. We hope that this publication will increase awareness, input and support from all the stakeholders involved in paediatric therapeutics development.

Rational Use of Medicines in Neonates: Current Observations, Areas for Research and Perspectives

A focused reflection on rational medicines use in neonates is valuable and relevant, because indicators to assess rational medicines use are difficult to apply to neonates. Polypharmacy and exposure to antibiotics are common, while dosing regimens or clinical guidelines are only rarely supported by robust evidence in neonates. This is at least in part due to the extensive variability in pharmacokinetics and subsequent effects of medicines in neonates. Medicines utilization research informs us on trends, on between unit variability and on the impact of guideline implementation. We illustrate these aspects using data on drugs for gastroesophageal reflux, analgesics or anti-epileptic drugs. Areas for additional research are drug-related exposure during breastfeeding (exposure prediction) and how to assess safety (tools to assess seriousness, causality, and severity tailored to neonates) since both efficacy and safety determine rational drug use. To further improve rational medicines use, we need more data and tools to assess efficacy and safety in neonates. Moreover, we should facilitate access to such data, and explore strategies for effective implementation. This is because prescription practices are not only rational decisions, but also have psychosocial aspects that may guide clinicians to irrational practices, in part influenced by the psychosocial characteristics of this population.

Drug evaluation studies in neonates: how to overcome the current limitations

INTRODUCTION

Regulatory initiatives have stimulated drug research in infants, but the potential impact of drugs to improve health outcome in neonates remains underexplored. Areas covered: In this review, we focus on current limitations in drug evaluation studies and how to overcome these. The low volume of studies has additional weaknesses such as single center studies, non-commercial sponsorship, overrepresentation of high postulated risk reductions, and underrepresentation of therapeutic exploratory studies. Master protocols and selection criteria for neonatal centers to participate in studies are useful to improve logistics related to performance. Limitations also relate to inaccurate assessment of drug effects (efficacy/safety). This is because of poor symptom recognition, case definitions, and suboptimal data on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) epidemiology. To overcome these limitations, it is necessary to develop core outcome sets, reference values, and specific ADR tools. The limitations identified and approaches suggested to improve drug evaluation are illustrated using neonatal abstinence syndrome as an example. Expert commentary: We anticipate to see an evolving neonatal clinical pharmacology discipline driven by neonatal pathophysiology and knowledge. Multidisciplinary collaborative efforts between health care providers, academia, pharmaceutical industry, advocacy groups and regulatory agencies are crucial to improve the impact of drug evaluation studies in neonates.

The Cumulative Daily Tolerance Levels of Potentially Toxic Excipients Ethanol and Propylene Glycol Are Commonly Exceeded in Neonates and Infants

Polymedicated neonates and young infants may be at risk of harmful cumulative exposure to toxic excipients like ethanol, propylene glycol and benzyl alcohol during routine clinical care. The aim of this study was to calculate the cumulative daily alcohol exposure (mg/kg/day) in polymedicated neonates and infants and compare these levels to the tolerance limits found in guidelines published by European Medicines Agency (EMA). As part of the SEEN study, all medicinal products administered to neonates and infants were recorded. All included neonates received ≥2 medicinal products/day and infants ≥3 medicinal products/day. Daily excipient levels were calculated based on quantities obtained from manufacturers or databases. Excipient levels were compared to tolerance limits proposed by the EMA. Altogether, 470 neonates and 160 infants were included, recording 4207 prescriptions and 316 products. In total, 45% (n = 288) of patients were exposed to an alcohol of interest; 2% (n = 14) were exposed to benzyl alcohol (BA), 38% (n = 237) to ethanol and 23% (n = 146) to propylene glycol (PG). Of the total number of prescriptions involving ethanol-containing medicinal products (n = 334), 51% would alone exceed tolerance limit of 6 mg/kg/day. Of the total number of prescriptions involving PG-containing medicinal products (n = 174), 70% would alone exceed a maximum tolerance limit of 50 mg/kg/day. Maximal daily exposure to ethanol (1563 mg/kg/day) or PG (954 mg/kg/day) exceeded the tolerance limits recommended by EMA 260.5 and 19.1 times, respectively. Tolerance limits for ethanol and PG as proposed by the EMA are frequently exceeded in polymedicated neonates and infants due to the cumulative effect of these alcohols. Alternative formulations may minimize excipient exposure.

Improved drug safety through intensive pharmacovigilance in hospitalized pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to detect and analyze Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) through Intensive Pharmacovigilance (IPV) in hospitalized pediatric patients to improve drug safety.

METHODS

A prospective 6-month cross-sectional study was performed in the pediatric service of a regional hospital in Mexico in order to assess hospitalized children from 1 day to 18 years old. The inclusion criteria were: both genders, all hospitalization causes, and at least one prescribed medication (indistinct drug group). Notifications were performed through medical visits, phone calls, or spontaneous reports. ADR suspicions were assessed with severity scales: Naranjo algorithm, Schumock & Thornton and Hartwig and Siegel.

RESULTS

From a total of 1083 hospital admissions, 19 ADRs were recorded. The average age of patients in years was 7.2 (±5.9). The causality assessment in this study showed that most of the ADRs were probable (68.4%) and 4 certain (8.2%); causality was mainly attributed to antibiotics (AB) and an antiepileptic drug. We found a relationship of AB with ADRs (p < 0.05) with an increased risk at the third day of prescription (p < 0.05). The average severity was level 2 and 21% were classified as "preventable". Lastly, an increase in hospital stay associated with ADRs (p < 0.05) and with concomitant medications (p < 0.05), was also found. The most severe ADRs were hemolysis and toxic epidermal necrolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

IPV was an effective tool for ADR prevention, detection, and treatment in hospitalized patients. The intensive monitoring approach in pharmacovigilance amplifies ADR detection and this translates into the improvement of drug safety in children.

Better medicines for neonates: Improving medicine development, testing, and prescribing

Pharmacotherapy is a powerful tool to improve the outcome of neonates. Unfortunately, the potential health impact of pharmacotherapy in neonates remains underexplored. This necessitates a structured approach to go beyond the current practice of trial and error, reflected in off-label prescription. The existing regulatory framework hereby provides a structure to reflect about aspects like pharmacokinetic models for dose selection and outcome assessment, including long-term safety. Future medicine development should also be driven by neonatal needs, diseases and pathophysiology, since surfactant is the latest product developed for preterm neonates. The potential impact is illustrated by ongoing repurposing (propranolol, allopurinol, erythropoietin, Insulin-like Growth Factor-1) projects. Clinical researchers will be crucial to close the knowledge gap by developing dose selection tools and outcome assessment tools and by exploring pathophysiological mechanisms. The final step of such a structured approach cycle is the subsequent translation of accumulated knowledge into improved prescribing.

[Adverse drug reactions in neonates hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units in Barranquilla, Colombia]

INTRODUCTION

The appearance of adverse drug reactions in neonates is an important issue due to the lack of drug safety data.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the behavior of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in hospitalized neonates at two intensive care units in Barranquilla, Colombia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional prospective descriptive study based on patientcentered intensive pharmacosurveillance. We followed up and monitored the appearance of ADRs for six months. We used Naranjo's algorithm to assess causality, modified Hartwig and Siegel assessment scale to establish severity and Schumock and Thornton criteria to determine ADR preventability.

RESULTS

We detected 123 adverse drug reactions in 78 neonates of the 284 monitored. The cumulative incidence of ADRs was 27.4% (78/284); incidence density was 30.60 ADRs per 1,000 patients/day (78/2,549). The most affected organ system was the digestive (33.6%). Systemic anti-infective drugs were the most involved pharmacological group. Most of the ADRs were mild (58.5%), 83% were classified as probable, 16.2% as possible and 0.8% as definite.

CONCLUSIONS

ADR incidence was high in newborns, and it increased in preterm infants (less than 38 weeks of age).

Juvenile Nonclinical Safety Studies in Support of Pediatric Drug Development

A pediatric assessment is now a required component of every drug marketing application in North America, Europe, and Japan, unless a waiver has been granted previously. Nonclinical juvenile toxicity studies are often required as part of this assessment. The protocols for juvenile toxicity studies are best devised in consultation with the regulatory authorities. It is important to submit the pediatric investigation plan (PIP) or pediatric study plan (PSP) early, in order not to delay the marketing authorization of the drug in adults. The choice of species and the design of juvenile toxicity studies are based on a series of complex considerations, including the therapeutic use of the drug, age at which children will be treated, duration of treatment, and potential age- or species-specific differences in efficacy, pharmacokinetics, or toxicity.

Quantitative clinical pharmacology practice for optimal use of antibiotics during the neonatal period

INTRODUCTION

For safe and effective neonatal antibiotic therapy, knowledge of the pharmacokinetic parameters of antibacterial agents in neonates is a prerequisite. Fast maturational changes during the neonatal period influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters and their variability. Consequently, the need for applying quantitative clinical pharmacology and determining optimal drug dosing regimens in neonates has become increasingly recognized.

AREAS COVERED

Modern quantitative approaches, such as pharmacometrics, are increasingly utilized to characterize, understand and predict the pharmacokinetics of a drug and its effect, and to quantify the variability in the neonatal population. Individual factors, called covariates in modeling, are integrated in such approaches to explain inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. Pharmacometrics has been shown to be a relevant tool to evaluate, optimize and individualize drug dosing regimens.

EXPERT OPINION

Challenges for optimal use of antibiotics in neonates can largely be overcome with quantitative clinical pharmacology practice. Clinicians should be aware that there is a next step to support the clinical decision-making based on clinical characteristics and therapeutic drug monitoring, through Bayesian-based modeling and simulation methods. Pharmacometric modeling and simulation approaches permit us to characterize population average, inter-subject and intra-subject variability of pharmacokinetic parameters such as clearance and volume of distribution, and to identify and quantify key factors that influence the pharmacokinetic behavior of antibiotics during the neonatal period.

Neonatal drug therapy: The first frontier of therapeutics for children

Knowledge about the safe and effective use of medicines in neonates has increased substantially but has resulted in few label changes. Drugs developed for use in adults are reshaped and tailored to specific neonatal indications. However, the use of drugs in neonates should not only mirror adult pharmacotherapy, but should be driven by their own specific needs. Therefore, building collaborative networks may assist to develop a newborn-driven research agenda addressing their clinical needs and diseases.