1
|
Bates A, Letton ME, Arnold R, Lambert K. Barriers and enablers to exercise in kidney transplant recipients: Systematic review of qualitative studies. J Ren Care 2024. [PMID: 38806247 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exercise has the potential to reduce the susceptibility to comorbidity and cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients. However, kidney transplant recipients report lower levels of exercise compared to the general population, prompting an investigation into the barriers and enablers to exercise in this transplant cohort. OBJECTIVES This systematic review aimed to explore and map the barriers and enablers to exercise in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS Seven electronic databases were systematically searched. Themes were synthesised and then deductively categorised using the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS Eleven studies were included in the review. Commonly reported barriers to exercise were lack of exercise guidance (n = 9 studies), physical limitations (n = 5 studies) and a fear of harming the kidney (n = 7 studies). Enablers were a desire to return to normality (n = 5 studies), physical and mental benefits (n = 3 studies), goal setting and tracking improvements (n = 3 studies). At the local level, barriers identified by kidney transplant recipients were a lack of knowledge, fear of injuring the kidney, bad weather and physical limitations. Perceived enablers were already living an active lifestyle, mental benefits, exercise preferences and social support. CONCLUSION Key findings of this research were an increased demand for specific/explicit exercise information regarding type and intensity, and personalised guidance and support for kidney transplant recipients after transplantation. These findings can be used to inform the development of exercise resources and interventions for kidney transplant recipients and their health care professionals within the local community and at a greater level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Bates
- School of Medical, Indigenous & Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Meg E Letton
- School of Medical, Indigenous & Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ria Arnold
- School of Medical, Indigenous & Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Concord Repatriation and General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kelly Lambert
- School of Medical, Indigenous & Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trần TB, Ambrens M, Nguyễn J, Coleman E, Gilanyi Y, Letton M, Pandit A, Lock L, Thom JM, Sen S, Lambert K, Arnold R. Preferences of people with chronic kidney disease regarding digital health interventions that promote healthy lifestyle: qualitative systematic review with meta-ethnography. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082345. [PMID: 38802278 PMCID: PMC11131123 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Diet and physical activity are crucial for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to maintain good health. Digital health interventions can increase access to lifestyle services. However, consumers' perspectives are unclear, which may reduce the capacity to develop interventions that align with specific needs and preferences. Therefore, this review aims to synthesise the preferences of people with CKD regarding digital health interventions that promote healthy lifestyle. DESIGN Qualitative systematic review with meta-ethnography. DATA SOURCES Databases Scopus, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus were searched between 2000 and 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Primary research papers that used qualitative exploration methods to explore the preferences of adults with CKD (≥18 years) regarding digital health interventions that promoted diet, physical activity or a combination of these health behaviours. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers screened title, abstract and full text. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Consumers' quotes were extracted verbatim and synthesised into higher-order themes and subthemes. RESULTS Database search yielded 5761 records. One record was identified following communication with a primary author. 15 papers were included. These papers comprised 197 consumers (mean age 51.0±7.2), including 83 people with CKD 1-5; 61 kidney transplant recipients; 53 people on dialysis. Sex was reported in 182 people, including 53% male. Five themes were generated regarding consumers' preferences for digital lifestyle interventions. These included simple instruction and engaging design; individualised interventions; virtual communities of care; education and action plans; and timely reminders and automated behavioural monitoring. CONCLUSION Digital health interventions were considered an important mechanism to access lifestyle services. Consumers' preferences are important to ensure future interventions are tailored to specific needs and goals. Future research may consider applying the conceptual framework of consumers' preferences in this review to develop and evaluate the effect of a digital lifestyle intervention on health outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023411511.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thái Bình Trần
- School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, University of Wollongong Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Meghan Ambrens
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer Nguyễn
- Department of Renal Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eve Coleman
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yannick Gilanyi
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Meg Letton
- School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, University of Wollongong Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anurag Pandit
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Logan Lock
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeanette M Thom
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shaundeep Sen
- Department of Renal Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kelly Lambert
- School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, University of Wollongong Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ria Arnold
- School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, University of Wollongong Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Young HML, Castle EM, Briggs J, Walklin C, Billany RE, Asgari E, Bhandari S, Bishop N, Bramham K, Burton JO, Campbell J, Chilcot J, Cooper N, Deelchand V, Graham-Brown MPM, Haggis L, Hamilton A, Jesky M, Kalra PA, Koufaki P, Macdonald J, McCafferty K, Nixon AC, Noble H, Saynor ZL, Taal MW, Tollitt J, Wheeler DC, Wilkinson TJ, Greenwood SA. The development and internal pilot trial of a digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention (Kidney BEAM) for people with chronic kidney disease. Sci Rep 2024; 14:700. [PMID: 38184737 PMCID: PMC10771473 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50507-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
This trial assessed the feasibility and acceptability of Kidney BEAM, a physical activity and emotional well-being self-management digital health intervention (DHI) for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which offers live and on-demand physical activity sessions, educational blogs and videos, and peer support. In this mixed-methods, multicentre randomised waitlist-controlled internal pilot, adults with established CKD were recruited from five NHS hospitals and randomised 1:1 to Kidney BEAM or waitlist control. Feasibility outcomes were based upon a priori progression criteria. Acceptability was primarily explored via individual semi-structured interviews (n = 15). Of 763 individuals screened, n = 519 (68%, 95% CI 65 to 71%) were eligible. Of those eligible, n = 303 (58%, 95% CI 54-63%) did not respond to an invitation to participate by the end of the pilot period. Of the 216 responders, 50 (23%, 95% CI 18-29%) consented. Of the 42 randomised, n = 22 (10 (45%) male; 49 ± 16 years; 14 (64%) White British) were allocated to Kidney BEAM and n = 20 (12 (55%) male; 56 ± 11 years; 15 (68%) White British) to the waitlist control group. Overall, n = 15 (30%, 95% CI 18-45%) withdrew during the pilot phase. Participants completed a median of 14 (IQR 5-21) sessions. At baseline, 90-100% of outcome data (patient reported outcome measures and a remotely conducted physical function test) were completed and 62-83% completed at 12 weeks follow-up. Interview data revealed that remote trial procedures were acceptable. Participants' reported that Kidney BEAM increased their opportunity and motivation to be physically active, however, lack of time remained an ongoing barrier to engagement with the DHI. An randomised controlled trial of Kidney BEAM is feasible and acceptable, with adaptations to increase recruitment, retention and engagement.Trial registration NCT04872933. Date of first registration 05/05/2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M L Young
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
- National Institute of Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.
| | - Ellen M Castle
- School of Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University, London, UK
| | - Juliet Briggs
- Renal Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Roseanne E Billany
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Elham Asgari
- Department of Nephrology, Guys and St Thomas's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sunil Bhandari
- Department of Nephrology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - Nicolette Bishop
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Kate Bramham
- Renal Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - James O Burton
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Jackie Campbell
- Faculty of Health, Education and Society, University of Northampton, Northampton, UK
| | - Joseph Chilcot
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola Cooper
- Department of Population Health Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Lynda Haggis
- Renal Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alexander Hamilton
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Mark Jesky
- Department of Nephrology, Nottingham NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Philip A Kalra
- Department of Nephrology Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Pelagia Koufaki
- Dietetics, Nutrition & Biological Sciences, Physiotherapy, Podiatry & Radiography Division, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jamie Macdonald
- Institute for Applied Human Physiology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Andrew C Nixon
- Department of Renal Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Noble
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Zoe L Saynor
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Maarten W Taal
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - James Tollitt
- Department of Nephrology Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - David C Wheeler
- Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas J Wilkinson
- National Institute of Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Castle EM, Billany RE, Lightfoot CJ, Annema C, De Smet S, Graham-Brown MP, Greenwood SA. Exercise as a therapeutic intervention in chronic kidney disease: are we nearly there yet? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2023; 32:502-508. [PMID: 37622530 PMCID: PMC10552838 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The opportunity to review the more recent evidence for prescribing exercise-based physical rehabilitation for people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is timely. There has been a recent global focus evaluating how physical activity interventions might improve health-related quality of life and outcomes for people living with chronic health conditions in a post-COVID era. There is finally a long overdue commitment from the kidney research and clinical community to deliver pragmatic interventions to help people living with CKD to be able to live well with their condition. RECENT FINDINGS This article reviews recent research, and discusses the challenges and potential solutions, for providing exercise-based therapeutic options for people living with CKD; including predialysis self-management interventions, options for both prehabilitation and posttransplant rehabilitation, pragmatic considerations for delivery of exercise therapy for people receiving haemodialysis treatment and the role of virtual kidney-specific rehabilitation. SUMMARY Whilst there remains a need for further research in this area of patient care, there is now a body of evidence and kidney-specific guidelines that firmly support a rollout of pragmatic and scalable exercise-based interventions for people living with CKD. We are indeed nearly there now.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M. Castle
- Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine, and life Sciences, Brunel University, London, UK
| | - Roseanne E. Billany
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Courtney J. Lightfoot
- Leicester Kidney Lifestyle Team, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Coby Annema
- Section of Nursing Science, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Stefan De Smet
- Group Rehabilitation for Internal Disorders, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Sharlene A. Greenwood
- Renal Therapies, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Castle EM, Dijk G, Asgari E, Shah S, Phillips R, Greenwood J, Bramham K, Chilcot J, Greenwood SA. The Feasibility and User-Experience of a Digital Health Intervention Designed to Prevent Weight Gain in New Kidney Transplant Recipients—The ExeRTiOn2 Trial. Front Nutr 2022; 9:887580. [PMID: 35677553 PMCID: PMC9168981 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.887580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Half of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) gain more than 5% of their body weight in the first year following transplantation. KTRs have requested support with physical activity (PA) and weight gain prevention, but there is no routine care offered. There are few high-quality studies investigating the clinical value of diet, PA or combined interventions to prevent weight gain. The development and evaluation of theoretically informed complex-interventions to mitigate weight gain are warranted. The aims of this mixed-methods randomized controlled trial (RCT) were to explore the feasibility, acceptability and user-experience of a digital healthcare intervention (DHI) designed to prevent post-transplant weight gain, in preparation for a large multi-center trial. New KTRs (<3 months) with access to an internet compatible device were recruited from a London transplant center. The usual care (UC) group received standard dietary and PA advice. The intervention group (IG) received access to a 12-week DHI designed to prevent post-transplant weight gain. Primary feasibility outcomes included screening, recruitment, retention, adherence, safety and hospitalizations and engagement and experience with the DHI. Secondary outcomes (anthropometrics, bioimpedance, arterial stiffness, 6-minute walk distance and questionnaires) were measured at baseline, 3- and 12-months. 38 KTRs were screened, of which 32 (84.2%) were eligible, and of those 20 (62.5%) consented, with 17 participants (85%) completing baseline assessment (Median 49 years, 58.8% male, Median 62 days post-transplant). Participants were randomized using a computer-generated list (n = 9 IG, n = 8 UC). Retention at 12-months was 13 (76.4%) (n = 6 IG, n = 7 UC). All a priori progression criteria were achieved. There were no associated adverse events. Reflexive thematic analysis revealed four themes regarding trial participation and experience whilst using the DHI. Halting recruitment due to COVID-19 resulted in the recruitment of 40% of the target sample size. Mixed-methods data provided important insights for future trial design. A definitive RCT is warranted and welcomed by KTRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M. Castle
- Therapies Department, King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- King's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Renal Sciences, King's College London University, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Ellen M. Castle ; orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-6108
| | - Giulia Dijk
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elham Asgari
- Kidney Services Team, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sapna Shah
- King's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Renal Sciences, King's College London University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Phillips
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - James Greenwood
- Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Bramham
- King's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Chilcot
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sharlene A. Greenwood
- Therapies Department, King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- King's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Renal Sciences, King's College London University, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mclaughlin M, Duff J, McKenzie T, Campbell E, Sutherland R, Wiggers J, Wolfenden L. Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2021; 4:e26690. [PMID: 34309565 PMCID: PMC8367175 DOI: 10.2196/26690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effectively scaled-up physical activity interventions are urgently needed to address the high prevalence of physical inactivity. To facilitate scale-up of an efficacious school-based physical activity program (Physical Activity 4 Everyone [PA4E1]), provision of implementation support to physical education (PE) teachers was adapted from face-to-face and paper-based delivery modes to partial delivery via a website. A lack of engagement (usage and subjective experience) with digital delivery modes, including websites, may in part explain the typical reduction in effectiveness of scaled-up interventions that use digital delivery modes. A process evaluation focused on the PA4E1 website was undertaken. OBJECTIVE The 2 objectives were to (1) describe the usage of the PA4E1 program website by in-school champions (PE teachers leading the program within their schools) and PE teachers using quantitative methods; (2) examine the usage, subjective experience, and usability of the PA4E1 program website from the perspective of in-school champions using mixed methods. METHODS The first objective used website usage data collected across all users (n=273) throughout the 9 school terms of the PA4E1 implementation support. The 4 usage measures were sessions, page views, average session duration, and downloads. Descriptive statistics were calculated and explored across the duration of the 26-month program. The second objective used mixed methods, triangulating data from the first objective with data from a think-aloud survey and usability test completed by in-school champions (n=13) at 12 months. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically alongside descriptive statistics from the quantitative data in a triangulation matrix, generating cross-cutting themes using the "following a thread" approach. RESULTS For the first objective, in-school champions averaged 48.0 sessions per user, PE teachers 5.8 sessions. PE teacher sessions were of longer duration (10.5 vs 7.6 minutes) and included more page views (5.4 vs 3.4). The results from the mixed methods analysis for the second objective found 9 themes and 2 meta-themes. The first meta-theme indicated that the website was an acceptable and appropriate delivery mode, and usability of the website was high. The second meta-theme found that the website content was acceptable and appropriate, and identified specific suggestions for improvement. CONCLUSIONS Digital health interventions targeting physical activity often experience issues of lack of user engagement. By contrast, the findings from both the quantitative and mixed methods analyses indicate high usage and overall acceptability and appropriateness of the PA4E1 website to school teachers. The findings support the value of the website within a multidelivery mode implementation intervention to support schools to implement physical activity promoting practices. The analysis identified suggested intervention refinements, which may be adopted for future iterations and further scale-up of the PA4E1 program. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000681358; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372870.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Mclaughlin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Jed Duff
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia
| | - Tom McKenzie
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Campbell
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Rachel Sutherland
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - John Wiggers
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
“You Can’t Manage What You Can’t Measure”: Perspectives of Transplant Recipients on Two Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management. TRANSPLANTOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/transplantology2020020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous research suggests that effective lifestyle interventions for solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients must be tailored to address the unique life circumstances of this population. As few studies have investigated this design consideration, this study aimed to explore the perspectives and experiences of SOT recipients after completing a Group Lifestyle Balance™ [GLB]-based intervention incorporating either (a) standard population-based nutrition guidance or (b) nutrigenomics-based nutrition guidance. All active participants in the Nutrigenomics, Overweight/Obesity, and Weight Management-Transplant (NOW-Tx) pilot study were invited to participate. Data were collected through focus groups and individual interviews. Ninety-five percent (n = 18) of the NOW-Tx pilot study participants enrolled in the current study: 15 participated in 3 focus groups; 3 were interviewed individually. Three themes were common to both intervention groups: (1) the post-transplant experience; (2) beneficial program components; (3) suggestions for improvement. A unique theme was identified for the nutrigenomics-based intervention, comprising the sub-themes of intervention-specific advantages, challenges, and problem-solving. The readily available and adaptable GLB curriculum demonstrated both feasibility and acceptability and was aligned with participants’ needs and existing health self-management skills. The addition of nutrigenomics-based guidance to the GLB curriculum may enhance motivation for behaviour change in this patient population.
Collapse
|