Prostatic urethral lift vs transurethral resection of the prostate: 2-year results of the BPH6 prospective, multicentre, randomized study

[Conflicts of interest in scientific publications and possible consequences : A critical analysis using the example of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)]

Technological advancements in endourology rely on close collaboration between medical expertise and industrial research. While this symbiosis is essential for medical progress, it also raises potential conflicts of interest. Using the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as an example, this study examines various mechanisms through which industry influences scientific evidence. These include selective study design, industry-sponsored educational events, and direct financial ties between industry and medical professionals. Case studies of Aquablation (ProCePT BioRobotics, San Jose CA, USA), Rezum (Boston Scientific, Marborough, MA, USA), and UroLift® (UroLift, Pleasanton, CA, USA) illustrate how methodological peculiarities in study designs and selective endpoint choices can impact the quality of evidence. The analysis underscores the need to balance technological innovation with the preservation of scientific independence. Proposed solutions include strengthening independent research funding, systematically incorporating patient preferences, and ensuring structured follow-up of long-term outcomes.

Ejaculation sparing of classic and minimally invasive surgical treatments of LUTS/BPH

BACKGROUND

The surgical landscape for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) has evolved with the introduction of Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies (MISTs), recognizing the impact of sexual function on patients' well-being, and prioritizing ejaculation-sparing approaches.

METHODS

This systematic review explored ejaculation sparing after classic endoscopic procedures and MISTs (iTind, Rezūm, Urolift, Aquablation, and TPLA) and a literature search yielded 41 studies.

RESULTS

While all procedures demonstrated efficacy in improving LUTS/BPH symptoms (IPSS, QoL, Qmax), a subset of studies evaluated ejaculatory function. Positive outcomes were noted, challenging the historical association of BPH surgeries with ejaculatory dysfunction. Variations in study design, patient cohorts, and limited long-term data present challenges. Notably, the lack of baseline specificity, use of alpha-blockers, and non-specific sexual function assessments underscore potential biases.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limitations, the review tentatively concluded that MISTs, including iTind, Rezūm, Urolift, Aquablation, and TPLA, appear comparable in sparing ejaculation. Long-term studies are essential to validate sustainability, and comparative research should assess trade-offs between MISTs and traditional surgeries. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes and quality of life assessments will enhance future investigations, refining MISTs as standard therapeutic options for LUTS/BPH.

Interpreting Prostate Multiparametric MRI: Beyond Adenocarcinoma - Anatomical Variations, Mimickers, and Post-Intervention Changes

Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer. However, its accuracy can be confounded by a spectrum of noncancerous entities with similar radiological features, posing a challenge for definitive diagnosis. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the MRI phenotypes of both common and rare benign prostate conditions that may be mistaken for malignancy. The narrative encompasses anatomical variants, other neoplastic processes, inflammatory conditions, and alterations secondary to medical interventions. Furthermore, this review underscores the critical role of MRI quality in diagnostic accuracy and explores the emerging contributions of artificial intelligence in enhancing image interpretation.

Efficacy of the Rezūm System for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: Long term results from a single centre prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent urological condition leading to lower urinary tract symptoms. Minimal invasive surgical treatment (MISTs) such as Rezūm System are emerging aiming to relieve symptoms. We present results from a single centre prospective study.

METHODS

We prospectively followed patients undergoing Rezūm between 2021 and 2023 from a single centre. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), functional outcomes (maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and post-void urinary residual (PVR) and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) were assessed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Anterograde ejaculation was assessed at 12 months follow up. Linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) for repeated measures were applied to assess differences in the IPSS, maximum flow rate (Qmax), PVR, and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) from baseline (t0) to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: After adjusting for prostate volume and symptoms severity, significant differences were observed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months for IPSS (p < 0.001), Qmax (p < 0.001), PVR (p < 0.001) and IPSS-QoL (p < 0.001) from baseline. No statistically significant changes were found in the IIEF-5 scores at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months from baseline. Anterograde ejaculation remained in 98% of patients after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the study's findings indicate that patients undergoing Rezūm treatment experience sustained improvements in IPSS, Qmax, PVR and IPSS-related quality of life up to 24 months following the intervention. Anterograde ejaculation remained in 98% of patients after treatment.

Absence of Race/Ethnicity Reporting in Clinical Trials of True Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the extent of racial reporting and enrollment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for the office-based treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted for RCTs assessing 6 office-based MISTs: transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT), prostatic artery embolization, prostatic urethral lift, temporary implantable nitinol device, water vapor thermal therapy, and Optilume. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up to November 3, 2023. Publications were excluded if they (1) did not address one of the aforementioned office-based MISTs for the treatment of BPH; (2) were not RCTs; (3) were an abstract or conference proceeding; or (4) were not published in English. In addition to study characteristics, data about racial reporting were collected. Two independent reviewers completed screening at title, abstract, and full-text levels, with conflicts resolved by consensus with a third reviewer.

RESULTS

A total of 61 publications representing 37 unique RCTs (n = 4027 unique patients) were reviewed, with publication years spanning from 1993 to 2023. TUMT was the most frequently studied MIST. Most publications (79%) were based solely in Europe or North America. Over 50% of the publications were multicenter trials. None of the included publications reported on race/ethnicity of study participants.

CONCLUSION

None of the 61 included publications of RCTs of office-based MISTs provided information on racial/ethnic composition of study participants. There is a staggering gap in the standardization of race/ethnicity reporting and enrollment within RCTs of MISTs. More granular data on race/ethnicity allow for better generalizability and equity.

Clinical application of the UroLift® prostatic urethral lift in Spain: consensus on the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with urinary flow obstruction and secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is an increasingly common pathology in the adult male. BPH increases after the age of 40-45 years, and its management consumes an enormous amount of resources. The UroLift® System is an approved technology designed to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH and is used to perform the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) procedure. Various urology specialists in Spain with experience in PUL have prepared this consensus document. Endorsed by the Spanish Urology Association, its information is based on the most recent findings. The main objective of this document is to disseminate the consensus recommendations among all professionals treating patients with LUTS/BPH. Both primary care physicians and urologists can assess and offer PUL as an effective, minimally invasive treatment.

Postoperative urinary incontinence following BPH surgery: insights from a comprehensive national database analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) is a feared complication of BPH surgery. Our study aims to investigate the incidence of UI among patients undergoing different procedures for BPH.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using a large national database, containing patient records between 2011 and 2022. The most employed surgical procedures for BPH were considered, including TURP, Transurethral Incision of the Prostate (TUIP), Holmium/Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP/ThuLEP), Open Simple Prostatectomy (OSP), minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (Lap/Rob SP), Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP), Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL), Robotic Waterjet Treatment (RWT - Aquablation®), Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (WVTT - Rezum®) and Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE). Rates of any type of UI, including stress UI (SUI), urge UI (UUI) and mixed UI (MUI) were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors of "persistent" postoperative UI, defined as the presence of an active UI diagnosis at 12 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

Among 274,808 patients who underwent BPH surgery, 11,017 (4.01%) experienced persistent UI. UUI rates varied between 0.62% (PAE) and 2.71% (PVP), SUI ranged from 0.04% (PAE) and 2.75% (Lap/Rob SP), while MUI between 0.11% (PAE) and 1.17% (HoLEP/ThuLEP). On multivariable analysis, HoLEP/ThuLEP (OR 1.612; 95% CI: 1.508-1.721; P<0.001), PVP (OR 1.164; 95% CI:1.122-1.208; P<0.001), Open SP (OR 1.424; 95% CI:1.241- 1.624; P<0.001), and Lap/Rob SP (OR 1.667; 95% CI:1.119-2.384; P<0.01) showed significant higher likelihood of UI compared to TURP. PUL (OR 0.604; 95% CI:0.566-0.644; P<0.001), WVTT (OR 0.661; 95% CI:0.579-0.752; P<0.001), RWT (OR 0.434; 95% CI:0.216-0.767; P<0.01), and PAE (OR 0.178; 95% CI:0.111-0.269; P<0.001) were associated with lower likelihood of UI.

CONCLUSIONS

UI remains a concerning complication following BPH surgery, but it is an uncommon event affecting <5% of patients. Some differences in UI rates and risk might exist among various BPH procedures. These findings underscore the need for thorough patient selection and counseling.

Impact of minimally invasive surgical procedures for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia on ejaculatory function: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) are affected by potentially bothersome side effects on sexual, and, above all, ejaculatory function. Several minimally invasive techniques have been proposed in the last years in order to overcome these consequences. Our aim is to summarize and evaluate the efficacy on LUTS relieve and the impact on sexual/ejaculatory function of Rezum, prostate artery embolization (PAE), implantation of a prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and the temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND).

METHODS

A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to October 2022, according to the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023466515). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective studies and non-comparative or comparative studies assessing the impact on functional and ejaculatory function after minimally invasive surgical therapies for Male LUTS were evaluated. Risk of bias assessment was performed according to the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for comparative studies, and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) for RCTs.

RESULTS

Overall, 47 studies were included (n = 4 for TIND; n = 9 for Rezum; n = 13 for PUL; n = 21 for PAE). Most studies relied on prospective patient cohorts and were rated as low risk of bias. Across studies assessing the efficacy of Rezum, a significant improvement in terms of IPSS (ranging from -47% to -56%) and Qmax (ranging from +39% to +87%) was reported. On the other hand, according to IIEF-5 score, Rezum had a minimal impact on sexual function (ranging from -1% to -3%). PUL showed a positive impact on IPSS (ranging from -35% to -58.2%) and Qmax (ranging from +49.9% to +114.7%) and sexual function. Finally, PAE showed encouraging functional results with IPSS score reducing from -12.8% to 63.3% and Qmax improving from +8% to 114.9% but the available evidence regarding the potential impact of PAE on sexual outcomes were limited.

CONCLUSION

Rezum, PAE, PUL and TIND are safe and feasible techniques associated with a significant functional improvement. While available data suggest a minimal impact of Rezum and PUL on ejaculatory function, the evidence after PAE and TIND are still limited. Therefore, our review lays the foundation for further research aiming to identify the criteria to select best candidates for uMIST to tailor the management in light of specific patient- and disease- factors.

Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 5-year Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are two of the surgical options for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO). Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of PAE and TURP for LUTS/BPO treatment at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, open-label, single-centre trial at a Swiss tertiary care centre. The main outcome was the change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after PAE versus TURP. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, functional measures, and adverse events assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 mo. Between-group differences in the change from baseline to 5 yr were tested using two-sided Mann-Whitney and t tests.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Of the 103 patients with refractory LUTS/BPO who were randomised between 2014 and 2017, 18/48 who underwent PAE and 38/51 who underwent TURP reached the 60-mo follow-up visit. The mean reduction in IPSS from baseline to 5 yr was -7.78 points after PAE and -11.57 points after TURP (difference 3.79 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.66 to 8.24; p = 0.092). TURP was superior for most patient-reported secondary outcomes except for erectile function. At 5 yr, PAE was less effective than TURP regarding objective parameters, such as the improvement in maximum urinary flow rate (3.59 vs 9.30 ml/s, difference -5.71, 95% CI -10.72 to -0.70; p = 0. 027) and reduction in postvoid residual volume (27.81 vs 219.97 ml; difference 192.15, 95% CI 83.79-300.51; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The improvement in LUTS/BPO at 5 yr after PAE was inferior to that achieved with TURP. The limitations of PAE should be considered during patient selection and counselling.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we show the long-term results of prostate artery embolisation (PAE) in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of benign prostate enlargement causing urinary symptoms. PAE shows good long-term results in properly selected patients, although the improvements are less pronounced than with TURP. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02054013.

Advances in Outpatient Therapies and Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Comprehensive Review for Men's Health

Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) affects a large number of men and can be treated with behavioral, medical, or surgical treatments. The newest addition to medical therapy is β3-agonists for overactive lower urinary tract symptoms. Multiple new surgical treatments have become available in the past decade, including several clinic-based minimally invasive surgical techniques (eg, UroLift, Rezum, Optilume BPH), OR treatments (eg, Aquablation, single port robotics), and prostate artery embolization. The growth of options allows providers to better tailor BPH treatment to the specific disease factors and patient preferences.

Can we predict and manage persistent storage and voiding LUTS following bladder outflow resistance reduction surgery in men? ICI-RS 2023

AIMS

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) persist in up to 50% of patients after bladder outflow resistance reduction surgery (BORRS) in men. Our think tank aims to address the predictive factors for persistent LUTS after BORRS and to propose the recommendations for future research to enable improved better patient counseling and selection by more accurate prediction of treatment outcome.

METHODS

A think tank of ICI-RS gathered in 2023, Bristol, UK, to discuss the pre and postsurgical clinical and urodynamic evaluation of men undergoing BORRS and whether it is possible to predict which men will have persistent LUTS after BORRS.

RESULTS

Our think tank agrees that due to the multifactorial, and still not fully understood, etiology of male LUTS it is not possible to precisely predict in many men who will have persistent LUTS after BORRS. However, severe storage symptoms (overactive bladder, OAB) in association with low volume and high amplitude detrusor overactivity and low bladder capacity in preoperative urodynamics, increase the likelihood of persistent OAB/storage symptoms after BORRS. Furthermore, patients who are clearly obstructed and have good bladder contractility on preoperative pressure flow studies do better postoperatively compared to their counterparts. However, the benefit of pressure flow studies is decreased in patients who do not acceptably void during the study. Poor voiding after BORRS may occur due to persistent obstruction or detrusor underactivity.

CONCLUSION

Future research is needed to increase our understanding of why male LUTS persist after surgery, and to enable better patient selection and more precise patient counseling before BORRS.

Multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) of the prostate and Urolift: Identifying artefact size, location and clinical implications

Objectives

We sought to define the degree of artefact caused by prostatic urethral lift (PUL) on multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) to determine the location, size of artefact and if the device could potentially obscure a diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Methods

Ten patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo PUL for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and follow-up imaging. A standard mp-MRI protocol using a 3.0 Tesla scanner was performed prior to and following Urolift insertion. Pre- and post-PUL images were compared to measure maximum artefact diameter around each implant in each MRI parameter. A transverse relaxation time weighted (T2) artefact reduction protocol was also evaluated. The location of each artefact was then compared to a separate database of 225 consecutive patients who underwent magnetic resonance guided prostate biopsies.

Results

Artefact occurred around the stainless steel urethral implant component only. Mean T2 artefact maximum diameter was 7.7 mm (sd = 1.71 mm), with an artefact reduction protocol reducing this to 5.4 mm (sd = 1.43). Mean dynamic-contrast-enhancement artefact was 10 mm (sd = 2.5 mm), and mean diffusion-weighted-imaging artefact was 28.2 mm (sd = 7.8 mm). All artefacts were confined to the posterior transition zone only. In the 225 consecutive patients who had undergone magnetic resonance guided prostate biopsies, there were 55 positive biopsies with prostate cancer, with 13 cases found in the transition zones and no cancer identified solely in the posterior transitional zone.

Conclusions

The stainless steel urethral component of the PUL does cause artefact, which is confined to the posterior transition zone only. PUL artefact occurs in an area of the prostate that has a very low incidence of a single focus of prostate cancer. If there is concern for prostate cancer in the posterior TZ (e.g. if every other area is clear with a high PSA), this area can undergo targeted biopsy.

[Minimally-Invasive Surgical Techniques (MIST): Shedding Light on the Mist]

As life expectancy increases and there is growing demand for BPH treatments, innovative technologies have been developed, allowing for swift recovery, symptom relief, low complication rates, and the possibility of performing procedures on an outpatient basis, often under local anaesthesia. This review aims to describe the outcomes of newly developed minimally-invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for BPH treatment in terms of functional voiding parameters and sexual function. These therapies are categorized into primarily ablative (Aquablation [Aquabeam]), non-ablative (Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL, Urolift), temporary implantable devices [iTind]), and secondarily ablative procedures (convective water vapor ablation, Rezum, Prostate Artery Embolization [PAE]). All MIST technologies have advanced the medical care of patients with BPH while preserving ejaculation. However, there is a shortage of long-term data specifically addressing re-intervention rates and the preservation of functional voiding parameters. Although there is promising data from regulatory trials and randomized studies, all MIST therapies are potentially associated with severe complications. Patients considering such methods must be thoroughly informed about their inferiority compared with established transurethral procedures like TUR-P and enucleation.

Medical Treatment Incidence and Persistence After Surgical Relief of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Critical Analysis of the Literature

CONTEXT

The incidence and risk factors for persisting pharmacotherapy following surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the evidence on persisting pharmacotherapy of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) following surgical treatment of BPO.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses checklist (PROSPERO ID CRD42022310598). PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched in February 2022, with an updated search in October 2022. Studies evaluating pharmacotherapy in men aged >18 yr following surgical treatment of BPO were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, ten nonrandomized studies and one post hoc analysis of two randomized controlled trials were included. The incidence of persisting medical treatment or medical retreatment varied strongly between time points and investigated surgical techniques. Among the investigated techniques, most data were available for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Persistence of pharmacotherapy after TURP at 6 mo ranged from 8.7% to 57% for the use of alpha-blockers. The use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors after TURP ranged from 5.5% at 6 mo to 19% at 6-24 mo, whereas the use of antimuscarinics ranged from 3.4% to 28.1% at 6 mo. Data on initiation of pharmacotherapy after TURP also differed between study and type of medication. At 12 yr, the use of alpha-blockers after TURP ranged from 12% to 38%. The risk factors associated with medication after BPO surgery were age, history of diabetes mellitus, history of cerebrovascular accident, preoperative medication use, as well as surgical techniques other than laser enucleation of the prostate.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacotherapy for LUTS is common after BPO surgery. The outcomes following different surgical techniques are heterogeneous, with limited data from randomized controlled trials. Future studies on surgical treatment of BPO should include the use of LUTS-related pharmacotherapy after BPO surgery as a secondary endpoint.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In the present systematic review, we investigated the risk of ongoing or novel therapy with drugs following surgery for benign prostate enlargement. We found that a non-negligible proportion of men will need to take drug therapy after surgery. Certain risk factors can be identified, which are associated with a higher risk of drug therapy after surgery.

Evaluation of Current Surgical BPH Interventions for Young and Elderly Men

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Benign prostatic hyperplasia affects the quality of life of a significant number of men, especially as they age. There are continuous innovations in the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia, but many of these innovations are studied in the core population of men 50-70 years of age. This review focuses on the outliers of men aged 18-50 and 70 and older.

RECENT FINDINGS

Older populations have more comorbidities, higher rates of antithrombotic medications, and advanced symptoms. Properly selected older men can safely have significant objective and subjective improvement in their symptoms. The literature was scarce when evaluating younger men; however, ejaculatory preserving techniques are promising providing improvement in symptoms and preserving ejaculation. This review demonstrates that in properly selected elderly patients, improvements in quality of life while also providing safe surgical interventions can be achieved. Ejaculatory preservation techniques demonstrate promising results, but further studies are required to elucidate true outcomes.

Emerging Technologies for the Surgical Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Obstruction. A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) aims at ablating prostate adenoma by resection, enucleation, or vaporisation. Apart from established ablation modes according to the European Association of Urology guidelines, various technologies have emerged as safe/effective alternatives but remain under investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To explore short-term benefits/harms of emerging technologies for surgical management of LUTS/BPO.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL via Ovid up to June 18, 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) exploring aquablation, prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), Rezum, prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) versus sham/transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We included ten RCTs (1108 men). Aquablation versus TURP: insignificant change in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS; mean difference [MD] 0.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.44 to 2.44), quality of life (QoL; MD 0.30, 95% CI -0.81 to 0.21), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax; MD -0.30, 95% CI -3.71 to 3.11), retreatment (risk ratio [RR] 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-1.66), and urinary incontinence (UI; RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.26-1.95). PAE versus monopolar TURP (M-TURP): insignificant change in IPSS (MD 3.33, 95% CI -28.39 to 35.05), QoL (MD 0.12, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.54), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5; MD 3.07, 95% CI -1.78 to 7.92), and UI (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01-2.86), and significant change in Qmax (MD -9.52, 95% CI -14.04 to -5.0), favouring M-TURP. PAE versus bipolar TURP: insignificant change in IPSS (MD -2.80, 95% CI -6.61 to 1.01), QoL (MD -0.69, 95% CI -1.46 to 0.08), Qmax (MD -3.51, 95% CI -8.08 to 1.06), UI (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01-2.51), and retreatment (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.19-19.63). PUL versus TURP: insignificant change in QoL (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.29 to 1.09), UI (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-1.05), and retreatment (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.12-1.86), and significant change in IPSS (MD 3.40, 95% CI 0.22-6.58), and IIEF-5 (MD 3.00, 95% CI 0.41-5.59) and Qmax (MD -9.60, 95% CI -13.44 to -5.76), favouring PUL and TURP, respectively. Rezum and iTIND have not been evaluated in RCTs against TURP to date.

CONCLUSIONS

Supporting evidence for clinical use of aquablation, PAE, PUL, Rezum, and iTIND is very limited. Benefits/harms should be investigated further in high-quality RCTs.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This review summarises the evidence for the clinical use of aquablation, prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), Rezum, and temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) to manage lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. The supporting evidence for the clinical usage of aquablation, PAE, PUL, Rezum, and iTIND is very limited. Benefits and harms should be investigated further in high-quality randomised controlled trials.

Are adverse events during surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia device related? A review of the MAUDE database

PURPOSE

The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database contains anonymous, voluntary medical device reports. A review of device-related adverse events associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia surgeries was completed. The objective was to evaluate the occurrence and contributing factors to clinically significant complications in a cohort of patients electing to undergo surgical intervention for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

METHODS

The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was queried for "Aquablation, Greenlight Laser, Holmium Laser, Morcellator, Water Vapor Thermal Therapy, Loop Resection, and Prostatic Urethral Lift" from 2018 through 2021. A complication classification system (Level I-IV) based on the Clavien-Dindo system was used to categorize events. These events were then correlated with procedural technology malfunctions and classified as "device related" and "non-device related." Chi squared analysis was performed to identify associations between procedural technology and complication classification distribution.

RESULTS

A total of 873 adverse events were identified. The adverse events were classified into level I (minimal harm) versus levels II-IV (clinically significant). Aquablation (p < 0.017) and Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (p < 0.012) were associated with a higher proportion of reports with Level II-IV complications compared with other procedure types. Level II-IV complications were not associated with a reported device related malfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Aquablation and water vapor thermal therapy demonstrated noteworthy clinically significant complications which were not driven by device-related malfunctions.

Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): promise or panacea?

ABSTRACT

The increasing importance of treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), while avoiding side effects and maintaining sexual function, has allowed for the development of minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs). Recently, the European Association of Urology guidelines reported a paradigm shift from the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to the management of nonneurogenic male LUTS. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the most commonly used MISTs: ablative techniques such as aquablation, prostatic artery embolization, water vapor energy, and transperineal prostate laser ablation, and nonablative techniques such as prostatic urethral lift and temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTIND). MISTs are becoming a new promise, even if clinical trials with longer follow-up are still lacking. Most of them are still under investigation and, to date, only a few options have been given as a recommendation for use. They cannot be considered as standard of care and are not suitable for all patients. Advantages and disadvantages should be underlined, without forgetting our objective: treatment of LUTS and re-treatment avoidance.

[Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia : The German S2e guideline 2023-part 4]

BACKGROUND

Lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive for benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO) are one of the most frequent diseases in men and can have a significant impact on quality of life. Instrumental therapies are common, and many patients seek minimally invasive treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

Presentation and evidence-based evaluation of the minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Summary and overview of chapters 11-13 on minimally invasive therapies for LUTS/BPO of the current long version of the German S2e guideline.

RESULTS

In case of absolute indication for surgery or after unsatisfactory or undesired medical therapy, minimally invasive treatments such as UroLift® (Neotract Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA), Rezῡm™ (Boston Scientific, Malborough, MA, USA), iTIND™ (Olympus America Inc., Westborough, MA, USA), and prostatic artery embolization (PAE) can be considered. These indirect/delayed ablative therapies offer lower morbidity and the possibility of performing them under local anesthesia, but they are inferior to direct ablative/resective techniques in terms of effectiveness and sustainability.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated German S2e guideline summarizes evidence-based recommendations for new minimally invasive therapies for LUTS/BPO, which present alternative treatment options for selected patients.

Incidence of Surgical Reintervention for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Following Prostatic Urethral Lift, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, and Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: A TriNetX Analysis

Background

Prostatic urethral lift, or UroLift, has gained popularity as a treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Surgical reintervention rates are a reliable indicator for treatment durability.

Objective

The objective of this study was to utilize TriNetX, a third-party database, to investigate the incidence of surgical reintervention following UroLift, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) procedures for BPH from 2015 to 2018.

Design setting and participants

Male patients aged 18-100 yr diagnosed with BPH were identified in the TriNetX Diamond Network database between January 2015 and December 2018. Cohorts of individuals undergoing their first UroLift procedure were built using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. TURP and PVP cohorts were built as comparison groups. The cohorts were then queried for subsequent BPH-related procedures.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Reprocedure rates were assessed and descriptive statistics were used.

Results and limitations

The mean age at first-time UroLift was 70.1 ± 9.4 yr (n = 14 343). Cumulative reprocedure rates collected after first-time UroLift included 1 yr after UroLift (5.1%, n = 14 343) and 4 yr after UroLift (16.1%, n = 710), with an average annual increase of +3.6% per year following 1 yr after the procedure. Comparatively, TURP (n = 22 071) and PVP (n = 14 110) had 4-yr reprocedure rates of 7.5% and 7.8%, respectively, during the same timeframe. Limitations include a lack of clinical data and loss of follow-up data outside the Diamond Network.

Conclusions

The reprocedure rate of UroLift at 4 yr is double the rate of TURP and PVP. In appropriately selected patients, UroLift might be a suitable option for those who desire symptomatic relief from BPH with minimal erectile and ejaculatory side effects. However, the risk of secondary surgical intervention should be considered when considering BPH treatments.

Patient summary

We compared the reintervention rates of prostatic urethral lift (PUL), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using the TriNetX database, and have found that the highest reintervention rates were for PUL of 16% at 4 yr of follow-up, compared with about 8% for those who had TURP and PVP. Interestingly, the most common reintervention was the same operation at 1 yr. This has important implications when counseling patients about the durability of these various outlet procedures for BPH.

Transperineal laser ablation as treatment for benign prostatic obstruction: Safety, feasibility and functional outcomes-A pilot study

Background

Standard surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) requires anaesthesia and hospitalization. Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) is a novel minimally invasive treatment for BPO, which has been performed using local anaesthetics and conscious sedation.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to assess safety, feasibility and functional outcomes of TPLA for the treatment of LUTS in men fit also for standard surgery.

Methods

This prospective, multicentre, interventional pilot study included 20 patients. Eligible patients were men ≥40 years of age, with urodynamically proven bladder outlet obstruction, a peak urinary flow of 5-15 mL/s and a prostate volume of 30-120 cc. All subjects underwent Soractelite™ TPLA using the Echolaser® X4 system. Two to four fibres were placed in the prostate, whereafter laser light induced coagulative necrosis. Twelve months of follow-up included uroflowmetry, an ultrasound of the prostate and PROMs (IPSS and IIEF).

Results

Twenty patients were treated with TPLA using local anaesthetics and optional sedation. Sixteen patients were treated in an outpatient setting, using only local anaesthetics in 12 of them; four were treated in the operating room, whereof two under general anaesthesia. No device related adverse events occurred, nor did any grade ≥3 adverse events during follow-up. Post-TPLA, 10 men continued spontaneous voiding, and 10 men developed a urinary retention treated by a temporary indwelling catheter for 15.2 ± 3.5 days. At 12 months, Qmax improved from 9.7 ± 3.5 to 14.9 ± 6.0 (p = 0.015), IPSS improved from 21.3 ± 5.2 to 10.9 ± 5.5 (p < 0.0001), QoL improved from 4.9 ± 0.9 to 1.9 ± 1.1 (p < 0.0001), IIEF-15 total score remained stable and 11/13 patients (85%) preserved antegrade ejaculation.

Conclusions

TPLA is a safe and feasible treatment for men with LUTS due to BPO. TPLA can be performed in an outpatient setting under only local anaesthetics. Functional and quality of life outcomes improved significantly at 12 months, and erectile function remained stable.

Defining minimal invasive surgical therapy for benign prostatic obstruction surgery: Perspectives from a global knowledge, attitude, and practice survey

Objective

To scrutinize the definitions of minimal invasive surgical therapy (MIST) and to investigate urologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices for benign prostatic obstruction surgeries.

Methods

A 36-item survey was developed with a Delphi method. Questions on definitions of MIST and attitudes and practices of benign prostatic obstruction surgeries were included. Urologists were invited globally to complete the online survey. Consensus was achieved when more than or equal to 70% responses were "agree or strongly agree" and less than or equal to 15% responses were "disagree or strongly disagree" (consensus agree), or when more than or equal to 70% responses were "disagree or strongly disagree" and less than or equal to 15% responses were "agree or strongly agree" (consensus disagree).

Results

The top three qualities for defining MIST were minimal blood loss (n=466, 80.3%), fast post-operative recovery (n=431, 74.3%), and short hospital stay (n=425, 73.3%). The top three surgeries that were regarded as MIST were Urolift® (n=361, 62.2%), Rezum® (n=351, 60.5%), and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) (n=332, 57.2%). Consensus in the knowledge section was achieved for the superiority of Urolift®, Rezum®, and iTIND® over transurethral resection of the prostate with regard to blood loss, recovery, day surgery feasibility, and post-operative continence. Consensus in the attitudes section was achieved for the superiority of Urolift®, Rezum®, and iTIND® over transurethral resection of the prostate with regard to blood loss, recovery, and day surgery feasibility. Consensus on both sections was achieved for EEP as the option with the better symptoms and flow improvement, lower retreatment rate, and better suitable for prostate more than 80 mL.

Conclusion

Minimal blood loss, fast post-operative recovery, and short hospital stay were the most important qualities for defining MIST. Urolift®, Rezum®, and EEP were regarded as MIST by most urologists.

New minimally invasive solutions for Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) management: A position paper from the UrOP (Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata)

To the Editor, In recent years, alternative solutions have been proposed to obtain effective results comparable to TURP, which is currently considered the gold standard, and laser vapo-enucleation techniques (1, 2), but with the possibility of maintaining sexual functions. In recent years there has been a growing trend towards ejaculation preservation. Although the results of TURP (3), and most laser enucleation techniques are undoubted in the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) management, they often lack in the preservation of ejaculation. All the alternative recently proposed interventions (Rezum, AquaBeam, Urolift, TPLA, i-TIND, LEST) are procedures considered by some authors to be promising in both managing BPO and preserving sexual functions. However, all these methods are limited by a lack of long-term follow-up that would evaluate the efficacy over time, possible complications related to the method and the correct patient selection for a specific method. The aim of this letter is to summarize the available evidence and provide clinicians with practical recommendations on the use of the brand new minimally invasive techniques for the management of BPO. [...].

Initial experience with prostatic urethral lift versus enucleation of the prostate: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess initial results and patient characteristics of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) compared with those of bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (TUEB) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in older patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at a single institution and involved 25 consecutive patients with BPH who underwent PUL between April 2022 and May 2023. Patient characteristics, operative details, and pre- and postoperative symptom scores were evaluated. The results were compared with those of a previously reported TUEB group (n = 55).

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients in the PUL group was 74.6 years, and the mean prostate volume was 47.5 ml. The PUL procedure significantly improved urinary symptoms, particularly incomplete emptying (p = 0.041), intermittency (p = 0.005), and weak stream (p = 0.001). The PUL group had higher comorbidity scores (p = 0.048) and included older patients (p = 0.002) than the TUEB group. TUEB showed better improvements in some symptoms and maximum flow rate (p = 0.01) than PUL; however, PUL had a shorter operative time and fewer complications than TUEB (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The initial results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of PUL in older patients with BPH. Despite TUEB showing better outcomes in certain aspects than PUL, PUL offers advantages such as shorter operative time and fewer complications. Therefore, PUL can be considered a viable option for high-risk older patients with BPH.

Standardized technique for ejaculation preservation during prostatic endoscopic ablative surgery

PURPOSE

Ejaculatory dysfunction is the most common side effect of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. Modified techniques have emerged with the aim of preserving antegrade ejaculation without compromising obstruction relief. None are standardized or validated. The PARTURP study is a randomized study investigating partial versus complete prostate resection. We conducted an investigator consensus meeting to define the ideal surgical technique to achieve both correct obstruction relief with ejaculation preservation.

METHODS

An expert consensus meeting involving all investigators of the PARTURP study took place to define a common technique using the nominal group methodology. The objectives were to define the areas to be resected and the areas to be preserved; to define the criteria for proper obstruction relief; to define the criteria for proper ejaculation preservation.

RESULTS

All investigators (n = 15) attended the consensus meeting, and agreement between all the participants was obtained. The anatomical landmarks to be preserved are located around the verumontanum and along the posterior part of the prostatic urethra. These structures must be preserved up to 2 cm from the verumontanum. The participants agreed on the need to preserve the urethral mucosa in all the areas to be preserved and to reach the enucleation plane in the areas of resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical landmarks for ejaculation-sparing surgery have been defined by the investigators of the PARTURP randomized study. These landmarks will be used during the study, and the clinical outcomes of this ejaculation-sparing technique will be compared with complete resection with up to 3 years follow-up.

mparing Urolift and tandard ransurethral resection of prostate head of adiotherapy in men with urinary symptoms secondary to prostate enlargement in Southwest London and North Cumbria (CO-STAR): a study protocol for a randomised feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy with an enlarged prostate can have short-term and long-term urinary complications. Currently, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the mainstay surgical intervention for men with urinary symptoms due to an enlarged prostate prior to radiotherapy. UroLift (NeoTract, Pleasanton, CA, USA) is a recent minimally invasive alternative, widely used in benign disease but is untested in men with prostate cancer.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A multicentre, two-arm study designed in collaboration with a Patient Reference Group to assess the feasibility of randomising men with prostate cancer and coexisting urinary symptoms due to prostate enlargement to TURP or UroLift ahead of radiotherapy. 45 patients will be enrolled and randomised (1:1) using a computer-generated programme to TURP or UroLift. Recruitment and retention will be assessed over a 12 month period. Information on clinical outcomes, adverse events and costs will be collected. Clinical outcomes and patient reported outcome measures will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks postintervention and 3 months following radiotherapy. A further 12 in-depth interviews will be conducted with a subset of patients to assess acceptability using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Descriptive analysis on all outcomes will be performed using Stata (StataCorp V.2021).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) NHS Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW). The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at national meetings and disseminated to patients via social media, charity and hospital websites.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05840549.

Pharmacologic and Surgical Retreatment After Office-based Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Office-based treatments are increasingly offered as an optional step to replace medical treatment or delay surgery for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Nevertheless, little is known regarding the risks of retreatment.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the current evidence regarding retreatment rates after water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTIND) procedures.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search was conducted up to June 2022 using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The primary outcomes were the rates of pharmacologic and surgical retreatment during follow-up.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 36 studies including 6380 patients met our inclusion criteria. Surgical and minimally invasive retreatment rates were generally well reported in the studies included and reached up to 5% after 3 yr of follow-up for iTIND, and up to 4% for WVTT and 13% for PUL after 5 yr of follow-up. The types and rates of pharmacologic retreatment are poorly reported in the literature, with the latter reaching up to 7% after 3 yr of follow-up for iTIND, and up to 11% after 5 yr of follow-up for WVTT and PUL. The main limitations of our review are the unclear to high risk of bias in most of the studies included and the lack of long-term (>5 yr) data on retreatment risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the low retreatment rates at mid-term follow-up after office-based treatments for LUTS, supporting the development of these strategies as an intermediate step between BPH medication and conventional surgery. Pending more robust data with longer follow-up, these results should be used to improve patient information and facilitate shared decision-making.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our review highlights the low risk of mid-term retreatment after office-based treatments for benign enlargement of the prostate that is affecting urinary function. For well-selected patients, these results support the increasing use of office-based treatment as an intermediate option before conventional surgery.

Biocompatibility and efficacy of prostatic urethral lift in benign prostate hyperplasia: an in vivo and in vitro study

The study aimed to assess the biocompatibility and efficacy of a prostatic urethral lift (PUL) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Human BPH-1 cells were co-cultured with implant anchors and sutures, and cytotoxicity was measured. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe adhesion and growth of cells and to evaluate implant biocompatibility. Fifteen male beagle dogs were randomly assigned to the surgical (n = 9) or sham-operated (n = 6) groups. The surgical group underwent cystotomy, and PUL was used to insert two implants in each lobe of the prostate to compress the enlarged prostate and dilate the urethra; the sham group underwent cystotomy without implant insertion. Compared with the control group, no significant difference in cell viability among the groups with different co-culture times of implant anchors and sutures (P > 0.05) was observed. SEM revealed good adhesion and growth of prostate cells on the implants. Improvements in urine flow rates remained stable at 7, 28, and 180 days after surgery, and the urethral diameter in the prostate region was significantly increased compared with that before surgery. PUL is a biocompatible and effective treatment for BPH, improving the urine flow rate without causing inflammation, tissue damage, or cytotoxic effects. Here, the basis for further PUL application was provided.

Angioembolization for massive pelvic hematoma after prostatic urethral lift

Introduction

Pelvic hematomas are a rare complication of prostatic urethral lift. We would like to report the first case of massive pelvic hematoma after prostatic urethral lift that was successfully managed by selective angioembolization.

Case presentation

An 83-year-old gentleman with benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent prostatic urethral lift. Although the procedure was uneventful, he developed shock while in the recovery room. Urgent contrast computed tomography scan showed a large heterogenous hematoma at the right pelvis extending to the right retroperitoneum with contrast extravasation noted. Urgent angiogram confirmed extravasation from the right prostatic artery. Angioembolization with coils and 33% N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue was successfully performed.

Conclusion

Prostatic urethral lift can be complicated by the rare massive pelvic hematoma, possibly more common in small prostates. With a prompt contrast computed tomography scan, pelvic hematomas can be managed with angioembolization first and hopefully prevent open exploratory surgery.

Six novel minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in men. When drug treatment is ineffective or conventional surgery is not suitable, novel minimally invasive therapies can be considered. These include prostatic urethral lift, prostatic artery embolisation, water vapor thermal therapy, Aquablation-image guided robotic waterjet ablation, temporary implantable nitinol device and prostatic stents. These novel therapies can be performed in outpatient setting under local anesthesia, with shorter operative and recovery times, and better protection of ejaculatory function and erectile function. General conditions of the patient and advantages and disadvantages of the each of these therapies should be fully considered to make individualized plans.

Update on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia and the role of minimally invasive procedures

Lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia constitute a substantial burden, affecting the quality of life of those affected by this condition. While watchful waiting and medical management using a wide array of pharmaceuticals can be effective, surgery has been one of the most definite solutions for those highly affected by this condition. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard surgical procedure, but other alternatives using laser (HoLEP and ThuLEP) and robotic water jets (Aquablation) are emerging treatments aimed at reducing postoperative morbidity. Minimally invasive procedures conducted in outpatient settings and under local anesthesia or sedation are increasingly being used, especially in those patients with high surgical risk due to comorbidities. These procedures include prostatic arterial embolization, water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum), prostatic urethral lift (Urolift), temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND/iTIND), and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). The evidence supporting these treatments is growing, but some uncertainties remain as to what is the magnitude of their advantages and disadvantages compared to TURP. Innovations in the technologies involved in these new procedures may improve their profile for effectiveness and safety. Moreover, new devices are being investigated for marketing approval. Issues around costs and patients' preferences are also yet to be elucidated, thus their evolving role needs to be weighed against the aforementioned considerations.

Comparative efficacy and safety of prostatic urethral lift vs prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by means of a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Web of Science from inception to March 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PUL or PAE with either transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or sham procedures as control interventions. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed to pool the data on direct and indirect comparisons between interventions using STATA 14.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs with 675 participants were included in our network meta-analysis. Quantitative synthesis revealed that TURP was the most efficacious intervention for clinical (International Prostate Symptoms Score and quality of life) and functional outcomes (maximum urinary flow rate and post-void residual urine volume), and was associated with a lower reintervention rate compared with PAE (risk ratio [RR] 2.08 with 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 4.51) and PUL (RR 2.33 with 95% CI 0.50 to 10.86), although the difference were not statistically significant. Indirect comparison indicated that PUL and PAE resulted in similar outcomes. PAE was associated with fewer minor adverse events (AEs; RR 0.75 with 95% CI 0.48 to 1.18) and PUL with fewer major AEs (RR 0.72 with 95% CI 0.17 to 3.13) when compared with TURP. Whilst PAE had a better ranking with regard to improvement of most clinical and functional outcomes, PUL was the best ranked procedure regarding erectile function, as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function 5, but no significant difference was observed.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that PUL and PAE have similar clinical efficacy and safety profiles in the management of LUTS associated with BPH. However, the quality of evidence is relatively low because of the paucity of RCTs available, and results should be interpreted with caution.

Quisqualis indica extract for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Quisqualis indica in men with moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 135 subjects with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 8-19 were randomized in 2 centers from June 2018 to April 2019. Patients were assigned into one of the three groups: a low-dose group (LG, 1,000 mg Q. indica), a high-dose group (HG, 2,000 mg Q. indica) or a placebo group (PG). The primary endpoint was the change of IPSS at the end of treatment from baseline. Secondary end points included the changes of prostate specific antigen, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual volume (PVR) and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), with drug safety.

RESULTS

113 patients were able to finish the study. Compared to the PG, total IPSS in the LG and the HG was significantly improved at 6 weeks and 12 weeks. For IPSS subscores, LG showed improvements in all except for urgency and quality of life at 6 weeks. HG showed improvements in incomplete emptying and frequency at 6 weeks and 12 weeks along with improvements in intermittency, straining, and quality of life at 12 weeks. For IIEF-5 subscores, orgasmic function and overall satisfaction improved in HG when compared to PG at 12 weeks. Lastly, increase of Qmax and decrease of PVR was observed at 6 weeks in LG.

CONCLUSIONS

12-week treatment with Q. indica has a therapeutic effect and is well tolerated in patients with LUTS.

Impact of Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Sexual Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Erectile Function and Ejaculatory Function

CONTEXT

Several sexual side effects, including erectile, ejaculatory, and orgasmic dysfunction, were reported with the majority of surgical procedures for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review current evidence regarding the impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery on sexual function.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive bibliographic search on the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases was conducted in July 2021. The population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) model was used to define study eligibility. Studies were Included if they assessed patients with BPO and related lower urinary tract symptoms (P) undergoing BPH surgery (I) with or without a comparison between surgical treatments (C) evaluating the impact on sexual function (O). Retrospective and prospective primary studies were included. A pooled analysis was conducted on studies including the postoperative assessment of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5, Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD; Function and/or Bother), or retrograde ejaculation (RE) rate (PROSPERO database ID: CRD42020177907).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 151 studies investigating 20 531 patients were included. Forty-eight randomized controlled trials evaluating 5045 individuals were eligible for the meta-analysis. In most studies (122, 80.8%), only erectile and/or ejaculatory function was evaluated. A substantial number of articles (67, 44.4%) also used nonvalidated tools to evaluate erectile and/or ejaculatory function. The pooled analysis showed no statistically significant changes in IIEF-5 score compared with baseline for the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.76 pts; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.1, 1.62; p = 0.08), laser procedure (WMD 0.33 pts; 95% CI -0.1, 0.77; p = 0.13), and minimally invasive treatment (WMD -1.37 pts; 95% CI -3.19, 0.44; p = 0.14) groups. A statistically significantly higher rate of RE was found after TURP (risk ratio [RR] 13.31; 95% CI 8.37, 21.17; p < 0.00001), other electrosurgical procedures (RR 34.77; 95% CI 10.58, 127.82; p < 0.00001), and the entire laser group (RR 17.37; 95% CI 5.93, 50.81; p < 0.00001). No statistically significant increase in RE rate was described after most of the minimally invasive procedures (p > 0.05). The pooled analysis of MSHQ-EjD scores was possible only for prostatic urethral lift, showing no statistically significant difference between baseline and post-treatment MSHQ-EjD Function scores (WMD -0.80 pts; 95% CI -2.41, 0.81; p = 0.33), but postoperative MSHQ-EjD Bother scores were significantly higher (WMD 0.76 pts; 95% CI 0.22, 1.30; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Erectile function appears to be unaffected by most surgical procedures for BPO. RE is a very common adverse event of BPH surgery, although emerging minimally invasive surgical procedures could be associated with a lower risk.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery can have an impact on sexual function, mainly involving ejaculatory function.

Ejaculation Sparing Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: An Observational Prospective Study

Benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is a condition that appears with advancing age and affects 1/3 of men over 50 years, resulting in filling and emptying symptoms. One of the main limitations of endoscopic techniques for BPH is the occurrence of retrograde ejaculation. The purpose of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of ejaculation-sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES-ThuLEP) in the treatment of BPH-related LUTS and the preservation of ejaculation. Sexually active patients with BPH were enrolled and followed up with at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Personal and pharmacological histories were collected, while three standardized questionnaires—the International Index of Erectile Function short form (IIEF-5), the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for Male Sexual Matters Associated with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ—MLUTSsex), and the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS)—were administered. In addition, all patients underwent uroflowmetry and an assessment of post-void residual volume (PVR). A total of 53 patients were enrolled. A statistically significant improvement in the IPSS score, maximum flow (Qmax), and post-void volume (PVR) at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery was found (p < 0.05), while no statistically significant differences were reported between IIEF-5 scores before and after surgery. A total of 48 patients (88.6%) had preserved ejaculation at 3 months, while 92.4% and 94.3% of patients reported preserved ejaculation at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Nevertheless, some degree of hypoposia was referred, at 3, 6, and 12 months, by 43.7%, 30.6%, and 13.2% of patients, respectively. The ES-ThuLEP technique successfully preserved ejaculation in over 90% of patients, representing an ejaculation-sparing alternative in the treatment of BPH.

UroLift for Treating Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance Update

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) commonly occur as a consequence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), also known as prostate enlargement. Treatments for this can involve electrosurgical removal of a section of the prostate via transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), or prostatic urethral lift using the UroLift system. The UroLift system implants to pull excess prostatic tissue away so that it does not narrow or block the urethra. In this way, the device is designed to relieve symptoms of urinary outflow obstruction without cutting or removing tissue. National guidance recommending the use of UroLift in the UK NHS was first issued in 2015 by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE MTG26). We now report on the process to update the economic evaluation of UroLift, leading to updated NICE guidance published in May 2021 (NICE MTG58). The conclusions of the available clinical evidence were mixed and suggested that whilst UroLift improves symptoms over time, this improvement is smaller than that of TURP for symptom severity (IPSS) and urological outcomes. However, UroLift appears to be superior to Rezum for symptom severity and measures of erectile dysfunction and ejaculatory dysfunction. The updated economic model estimated that using UroLift as a day-case procedure for people with prostate of volume 30-80 mL creates a saving of £981 per person compared with bipolar TURP, £1242 compared with monopolar TURP, and £1230 compared with HoLEP.

Long-Term Outcome of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Single-Centre Retrospective Study in 1072 Patients Over a 10-Year Period

PURPOSE

Assess long-term outcomes of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single centre retrospective study from 2009-2019 including 1072 patients who received PAE and had available follow-up. Patients were evaluated yearly at 1-10 years post PAE using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL), prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual (PVR) volume. The need for prostatic medication, re-intervention rates, repeat PAE and prostatectomy rates were assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared between different embolic agents using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 4.39 ± 2.37 years. At last follow-up visit, mean IPSS and QoL improvements were - 10.14 ± 8.34 (p < .0001) and - 1.87 ± 1.48 (p < .0001) points, mean PV reduction was - 6.82 ± 41.11 cm³ (p = 0.7779), mean PSA reduction was - 1.12 ± 4.60 ng/mL (p = 0.9713), mean Qmax increase was 2.72 ± 6.38 mL/s (p = 0.0005), mean PVR reduction was - 8.35 ± 135.75 mL (p = 0.6786). There were 335 patients (31.3%) needing prostatic medication after PAE. Re-intervention rates were 3.4% at 1 year, 21.1% at 5 years and 58.1% at 10 years. Repeat-PAE rates were 2.3% at 1 year, 9.5% at 5 years and 23.1% at 10 years. Prostatectomy rates were 1.1% at 1 year, 11.6% at 5 years and 35.0% at 10 years. No significant differences were found between polyvinyl alcohol particles, Bead Block, Embospheres and Embozenes.

CONCLUSION

PAE induces durable long-term LUTS relief, with re-intervention rates of 20% in the first 5 years and 30%-60% > 5 years post-PAE.

[Minimally Invasive Therapy: What Is The Status In 2021 - What's Coming, What's Going?]

Due to the large number of men affected and a variable clinical presentation, the widespread disease "benign prostatic syndrome" requires individual treatment options tailored to the patient's specific clinical characteristics and wishes. If surgical treatment is indicated, there is a wide range of invasive procedures available. For a long time, transurethral resection of the prostate and simple prostatectomy were considered the gold standard, but these procedures are associated with increased morbidity and limitations in sexual function. Therefore, there is now an increasing call for minimally invasive treatment options that will provide effective and safe treatment in the outpatient setting. Over the past years, a variety of technologies and procedures have been developed and tested, but only a few of them have found their way into clinical practice, mostly due to insufficient functional results. For instance, transurethral needle ablation, transurethral microwave thermotherapy, intraprostatic botulinum toxin A or PRX302 injections as well as prostatic stents are no longer recommended. In contrast, the European Association of Urology is currently recommending UroLift, Aquablation and prostatic artery embolisation, which achieve significant long-term improvements in functional parameters while providing a good safety profile and preserved sexual function. Promising data are also available for the temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTIND), Rezūm, intraprostatic injection of fexapotide triflutate and transperineal laser ablation of the prostate, but the efficacy and safety of these procedures need to be confirmed in further studies.

The EXPANDER-1 trial: introduction of the novel Urocross™ Expander System for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the safety and feasibility of the Urocross Expander System (formerly branded as XFLO Expander System), an implantable nitinol tissue expander to trea t patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men of 50 years or older were eligible to participate in the international, prospective, three-arm, open-label EXPANDER-1 trial if they had a prostate volume between 30 and 80 cc, prostatic urethra length between 20 and 60/80 mm, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) > 13, peak urinary flow (Qmax) < 12 mL/s, post-void residual (PVR) urine volume < 250 mL and quality of life (QoL) score ≥ 3. Patients had pre-assigned implant indwell times (1, 6, and 12 months for Arm-1, Arm-2 and Arm-3 respectively) with follow-up through 6 months (Arm-1) and 3 years (Arm-2 and Arm-3) post-retrieval.

RESULTS

Outcome from treated subjects with their 6-month post-retrieval will be presented in this manuscript, as data collection from longer-term follow-up is ongoing. As of May 24, 2021, 39 and 22 men (mean age: 65), respectively, had implants successfully deployed and retrieved without any complications. No cases of implant encrustation were observed. Device- and procedure-related adverse events were predominantly mild to moderate in severity. Three SAEs were reported. Only one patient required catheterization post-implant for more than three days. Improvements in clinical parameters such as IPSS, QoL, PVR and Qmax as well as sexual function were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results demonstrate that the Urocross Expander System is a feasible and safe procedure for treating BPH/LUTS. A strong signal of efficacy justifies further evaluation of this PRostatic Urethral Expansion (PURE) procedure. Negative features of earlier generations of prostatic implants such as biocompatibility, migrations and encrustation have possibly been overcome.

Outcomes of prostatic urethral lift in a medically complex population at a veterans affairs hospital

Objective

The objective of this study is to report "real-world" outcomes of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) in a medically complex US military veteran population while employing liberalized procedural indications.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent PUL at our institution. There were no prostatic size requirements, patients were accepted on anti-platelet/anticoagulant therapy, no benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) medication washout was required, and there was no maximum post-void residual PVR. Pre- and post-operative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry, and PVR were recorded. Statistical comparisons were performed using simple t tests.

Results

From 2013 to 2019, 91 patients underwent PUL. Mean age was 70 (range 55-92) years. The majority of our patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 versus the general population at ASA class 2. Post-operatively, IPSS decreased by an average of 43% (23 to 13, p < 0.001). There was a mean 41% decrease in PVR (179 to 101 cc, p = 0.009), which was durable for a follow-up of up to 54 months. Maximum urinary flow rate improved by an average of 32% (9.3 to 12.3 cc/s, p = 0.003), which was also durable throughout follow- up. Forty-four patients required catheterization pre-operatively and 16 required catheterization post-operatively. Therefore, 27 patients (61.4%) were rendered catheter-free by PUL. Thirty-nine patients were taking antiplatelet medications peri-operatively, and 13 took anticoagulants. Only one patient (on warfarin) experienced hematuria requiring re-admission with catheter placement.

Conclusions

PUL produced effective and durable results in our veteran population, including in patients with significant pre-operative bladder decompensation and those on antiplatelets/anticoagulants.

Is Prostate Urethral Lift Effective in Patients with Multiple Comorbidities?

A prostatic urethral lift (PUL) can be performed under local anesthesia in patients normally at high risk for general anesthesia due to multiple comorbidities. However, the clinical efficacy of PULs in patients with multiple comorbidities remains unknown. Therefore, in this this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the PUL in patients with a high number of comorbidities by comparing its clinical efficacy in these patients with that in healthy individuals. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study, in which patients who underwent a PUL between December 2016 and January 2019 at a single tertiary care center were categorized into two groups: healthy individuals who wanted to preserve sexual function (Group 1) and patients with a high number of comorbidities who were at high risk for general anesthesia, based on an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of ≥3 (Group 2). The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual urine (PVR) were obtained preoperatively and compared throughout the 2-year follow-up. A total of 66 patients were enrolled, of whom 36 patients were included in Group 1 and 30 in Group 2. In Group 1, IPSS, IPSS quality of life (QoL), and Qmax significantly improved and were then maintained during follow-up, whereas, in Group 2, improvements in these parameters were not maintained during follow-up, except for IPSS QoL. Eleven patients (36%) in Group 2 required additional treatment for the recurrence of lower urinary tract symptoms. In conclusion, patients with a high number of comorbidities had a low therapeutic effect after PUL, suggesting a high rate of treatment failure. Therefore, comorbidity status should be considered when evaluating the potential benefits of the PUL procedure during preoperative counseling.

I Can't Get No Satisfaction: Patient-reported Outcomes After Different Treatment Options for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Effective clinical management of benign prostatic obstruction is determined by the ability to address lower urinary tract symptoms as measured via patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) offer better erectile or ejaculatory side effects and potentially faster recovery time in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Premature excitement for MISTs derives from prospective sham-controlled trials with several years of follow-up data. Currently there is a lack of randomized controlled trials that directly compare MISTs to TURP and of a clearer definition of treatment failure. These types of studies are important in comparing efficacy between treatments. In head-to-head comparison, TURP yields the most robust improvement in PROs when compared to MISTs. At best, MISTs may achieve equivalent urological symptom-relief profiles to TURP; however, noninferiority assessments are needed. MISTs are potentially advantageous for their side-effect profiles and lower complication rates, but consistency in reporting these data is needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the current data on patient-reported outcomes after each type of treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms. We found that the efficacy of these procedures is difficult to compare given the lack of direct studies comparing new options to the standard procedure. We can only conclude that the standard procedure, transurethral resection of the prostrate, will provide the best relief of voiding symptoms as reported by patients.

Real-world data comparing minimally invasive surgeries for benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES

To assess the differences in surgical outcomes between the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and previous thermal energy procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

We present an observational population-based study of 2694 men with BPH in New York State and California who received PUL, transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), or transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT) in outpatient and ambulatory surgery settings from 2005 to 2018. For these surgical procedures, short-term outcomes were reported and compared using a Chi-square test and mixed-effect logistic regressions. Long-term outcomes were described using Kaplan-Meier failure curves and compared using a Log-rank test and Cox regressions.

RESULTS

A significant portion of PUL patients had a comorbidity count ≥ 2 (n = 838, 37.0%). PUL exhibited the lowest 30 day and 90-day inpatient or ER readmission rates among all surgical techniques except for 90-day ER readmission (p < 0.05). No differences were observed for 1- and 3-year risks of reoperation between PUL [5.5% (95% CI 4.4-6.8%) and 14.9% (95% CI 10.9-20.1%)], TUNA [7.4% (95% CI 5.0-10.9%) and 11.3% (95% CI 8.3-15.4%)] and TUMT [8.5% (95% CI 4.7-15.2%) and 15.3% (95% CI 9.5-24.0%)]. 1- and 3-year risks of stricture development for PUL were 0.2% (95% CI 0.0-0.7%) and 0.2% (95% CI 0.0-0.07%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In a patient population with chronic conditions, patients treated with PUL exhibited similar 30- and 90-day inpatient or ER readmission rates when compared to previous reports. However, 1- and 3-year reoperation risks for PUL closely resembled previous thermal energy surgical procedures.

Evaluating Patient Preferences in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment Using Conjoint Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To quantify BPH patient preferences to promote guidelines-compliant, patient-centered care. Discordance between patient and urologist priorities for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) hinders patient-centered care. Physician assumptions regarding patient preferences lead to dissatisfied patients; a poor outcome in any quality of life surgery. American Urologic Association guidelines urge urologists to consider patient preferences when recommending a BPH treatment.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, online survey study using researchmatch.org, participants were required to decide between theoretical BPH treatments in a balanced, choice-based conjoint analysis. The treatments had varying levels of four attributes: efficacy, recovery difficulty, risk of complications (Clavien-Dindo 2+), and risk of de novo ejaculatory dysfunction. Demographic information and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were collected and analyzed using comparative statistics. Each attribute was analyzed using a conditional logit model, and attribute importance (range in utility between attribute-levels) was calculated.

RESULTS

Out of 1235 recruited participants, 812 (66%) completed the study. Median IPSS and age was 6 (IQR 3-12) and 56 (IQR 38-67), respectively. Complication risk was the most important attribute, followed by efficacy, recovery difficulty, and risk of ejaculatory dysfunction. In a subgroup analysis of age quartiles, participants age <38 and >67 held efficacy (31%) and complication risk (47%) to the highest relative importance, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Males valued BPH treatments that minimize complication risks, while ejaculatory dysfunction was least impactful. Variation in results between age subgroups emphasizes the need for individualized care to maximize patient satisfaction.

Surgical treatment options for benign prostatic obstruction: beyond prostate volume

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Many surgical treatment options are available for patients who present with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). This article reviews the current treatment options available and distinguishes them based on five clinical considerations: antithrombotic therapy, sexual function preservation, ambulatory procedures, anesthesia-related risks and duration of catheterization.

RECENT FINDINGS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed on 10 BPO procedures. Laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP), bipolar plasma transurethral vaporization of the prostate and photoselective vaporization (PVP) of the prostate reduces the risk of bleeding, which is recommended for anticoagulated men. Ejaculatory function is more likely to be preserved following transurethral incision of the prostate, Rezūm, Aquablation, UroLift and iTind. Same-day discharge is possible for LEP, PVP and prostatic arterial embolization (PAE). For patients with high anesthesia-related risks, procedures compatible with local anesthesia (UroLift, Rezūm, iTind and PAE) should be favored. Catheterization duration is shorter with UroLift, PVP and LEP.

SUMMARY

BPO treatment options are growing rapidly. The optimal procedure for a given patient is based on factors such as associated risks, recovery and expected outcomes. Besides prostate volume, the clinical considerations in the present article can help elucidate the best surgical BPO treatment option for each patient based on their values, preferences, and risk tolerance.

Office-Based Procedures for BPH

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease in men. A rapidly rising demand for safe and effective therapy for BPH has generated novel minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs). With multiple procedural options in the urology armamentarium for BPH therapy, we describe the current therapies and outcomes for office-based procedures for BPH including quality of life, voiding symptoms, and sexual function.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are three FDA-approved MISTs (Rezūm, Urolift, and iTind) and three emerging MISTs for BPH. Preliminary data suggest improvement in voiding symptoms and quality of life while minimizing unwanted sexual side effects. Long term data is required on the durability and safety of MISTs for BPH. MISTs mark a paradigm shift in BPH management. Sandwiched between conservative medical management and conventional transurethral surgery, these novel technologies promise to combine efficacy approaching that of TURP while sparing the negative side effects. We envision a future where BPH can be diagnosed and treated in an office-based setting with a standard cystoscope in one procedure.

Minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Cochrane network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the comparative effectiveness and ranking of minimally invasive treatments (MITs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched multiple databases up to 24 February 2021. We included randomized controlled trials assessing the following treatments: convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy (WVTT; or Rezūm); prostatic arterial embolization (PAE); prostatic urethral lift (PUL; or Urolift); temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND); and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or sham surgery. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 27 trials involving 3017 men. The overall certainty of the evidence of most outcomes according to GRADE was low to very low. Compared to TURP, we found that PUL and PAE may result in little to no difference in urological symptoms, while WVTT, TUMT and TIND may result in worse urological symptoms. MITs may result in little to no difference in quality of life, compared to TURP. MITs may result in a large reduction in major adverse events compared to TURP. We were uncertain about the effects of PAE and PUL on retreatment compared to TURP, however, TUMT may result in higher retreatment rates. We were very uncertain of the effects of MITs on erectile function and ejaculatory function. Among MITs, PUL and PAE had the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms and quality of life, TUMT for major adverse events, WVTT and TIND for erectile function and PUL for ejaculatory function. Excluding WVTT and TIND, for which there were only studies with short-term (3-month) follow-up, PUL had the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for retreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive treatments may result in similar or worse effects concerning urinary symptoms and quality of life compared to TURP at short-term follow-up.

[Minimally invasive treatment options for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia]

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is one of the most common diseases of aging men. Hyperplasia of the glandular tissue can cause distressing lower urinary tract symptoms, which can be treated with both drugs and interventions. For a long time, transurethral resection of the prostate and simple prostatectomy were considered the gold standard of surgical treatment. In order to be able to offer patients an outpatient treatment with few complications, shorter hospital stays and high efficiency, a variety of minimally invasive treatment options have been developed. While recommendations have already been made for the excision by focused waterjet, prostatic urethral lift, and prostatic artery embolization, there are several other very promising procedures for which, however, long-term data and data from comparative studies with reference procedures must still be awaited.