Antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The European Association of Urology urolithiasis guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stone disease. Given the complexity and variability of stone formation, individualised patient management is emphasised.

METHODS

The guidelines incorporate evidence from the latest research and focus on risk assessment, imaging techniques, pharmacological management, and surgical interventions. A research librarian conducted literature searches for urolithiasis in the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase databases via Dialog-Datastar. The strength of recommendations is also rated.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical history, biochemical evaluation, and imaging, with ultrasound as the first-line modality and low-dose computed tomography as the gold standard for precise stone assessment. Stone composition and burden influence treatment decisions with algorithms primarily based on stone size, location, and composition. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are recommended for first-line pain management, with opioids reserved as a secondary option. Medical expulsive therapy with α-blockers may be considered for selected patients with ureteral stones. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy remain the primary intervention modalities, with selection based on stone characteristics and patient factors. Advances in multiplanar imaging have improved assessment of the stone burden, although further research is needed to refine predictive models. Genetic testing is recommended for high-risk patients to guide personalised treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The guidelines provide a framework for clinical decision-making while acknowledging the need for continued advances in urolithiasis.

MONARCH™ Robotic-Assisted Combined Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A Step-By-Step Guide

The following video atlas summary comprehensively reviews all technical aspects of the standardized set-up, patient positioning, electromagnetic-guided renal access, integrated irrigation-aspiration system use, and robotic lithotripsy of the novel MONARCHTM (Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Redwood City, CA) combined mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy platform.

Disrupting Biofilms on Human Kidney Stones-A Path Toward Reducing Infectious Complications During Stone Surgery

Kidney stones are a common disorder associated with significant morbidity and often requires surgical intervention. Pathogenic bacteria are found in almost 40% of stones, where they form biofilms that are protected from systemic antibiotic treatments. Stone surgeries disperse biofilms resulting in up to 30% of patients developing postoperative urinary tract infections and 15% developing sepsis. This work is based on the hypothesis that chitosan, an antimicrobial polymer, can eradicate bacterial biofilms present in the stone and potentially serve as an adjunct to irrigation during stone surgery. First, fresh patient-derived kidney stone fragments (n = 56) are collected from stone surgeries. A total of 32% of stones are colonized, predominantly with Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Proteus mirabilis. A short, clinically relevant, chitosan treatment reduces the bacterial burden on colonized stones by over 90% in all specimens tested, regardless of stone composition and bacterial strain. To assess this approach toxicity, ex vivo human ureters and in vivo porcine bladders are exposed to topical chitosan irrigation. No toxic or pathological abnormalities other than urothelial exfoliation are noted. In conclusion, chitosan effectively disrupts kidney stone-associated bacterial biofilms with minimal urothelial toxicity and may provide an effective and safe approach to reducing postoperative complications.

A new scoring system to predict febrile urinary tract infection after retrograde intrarenal surgery

The current study aimed to determine the risk factors and define a new scoring system for predicting febrile urinary tract infection (F-UTI) following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) by using machine learning methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent RIRS and 511 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of 34 patients who developed postoperative F-UTI, and Group 2 consisted of 477 patients who did not. We applied feature selection to determine the relevant variables. Consistency subset evaluator and greedy stepwise techniques were used for attribute selection. Logistic regression analysis was conducted on the variables obtained through feature selection to develop our scoring system. The accuracy of discrimination was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Five of the 19 variables, namely diabetes mellitus, hydronephrosis, administration type, a history of post-ureterorenoscopy (URS) UTI, and urine leukocyte count, were identified through feature selection. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that hydronephrosis, a history of post-URS UTI, and urine leukocyte count were significant independent predictors of F-UTI following RIRS. These three factors demonstrated good discrimination ability, with an area under curve value of 0.837. In the presence of at least one of these factors, 32 of 34 patients (94.1%) who developed postoperative F-UTI were successfully predicted. This new scoring system developed based on hydronephrosis, a history of post-URS UTI, and urine leukocyte count can successfully discriminate patients at risk of F-UTI development after RIRS.

Bridging the knowledge gap: past, present and future of antibiotic use for ureteral stents

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the available literature on ureteric stent-related infections, the use of antibiotics and bacterial colonisation to identify the current incidence of stent-related infections, unveil knowledge gaps and generate potential hypotheses for future research.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane and urological association websites identifying relevant English literature published between 1983 and January 2024.

RESULTS

There is a worldwide lack of guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis for stent placement, exchange or extraction. In patients with a negative preoperative urine culture undergoing ureteroscopy and stent placement, it may be considered to only provide prophylaxis in presence of risk factors. However, in pre-stented patients a preoperative urine culture is important to guide prophylaxis during endourological surgery. During stent indwell time, antibiotic prophylaxis does not show any advantage in preventing urinary tract infections (UTIs). There is no strong evidence to support the use of antibiotics at time of stent removal. In the absence of any clear evidence, management strategies for treating UTIs in patients with ureteric stents vary widely. Stent exchange could be considered to remove the biofilm as a potential source of bacteria. Stent culture can help to guide treatment during infection as urine culture and stent culture can differ.

CONCLUSION

In terms of good antibiotic stewardship, urologists should be aware that unnecessary use of antibiotics provokes bacterial resistance. There is a great need for further research in the field of antibiotic prophylaxis and stent-related infections to develop evidence that can help shape clear guidelines for this very common urological practice.

Administering antibiotic-loaded irrigation fluid as an alternative for prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL): a randomized controlled trial

Prophylactic antibiotics are commonly used to prevent infections and complications during surgeries. In this study inflammatory responses and infectious complications after utilizing antibiotic-loaded irrigation compared with intravenous (IV) prophylactic antibiotics. Eighty-eight participants with ureteral stones enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated into two groups, namely "standard" with 45 participants, and "antibiotic-loaded" with 43 participants. The "standard" group received standard normal saline irrigation with 1 gram of IV ceftriaxone 30 minutes before in transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL), while the "antibiotic-loaded" group received ceftriaxone-added irrigation fluid and did not receive any IV antibiotics. The laboratory tests, including Complete Blood Count (CBC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), venous blood gas (VBG), IL-6, creatinine, sodium, potassium, SIRS score, and urine culture were recorded. The continuous variables are described using either mean (standard deviation (SD)) or median (interquartile range (IQR)) and the t-test and Mann-Whitney test are used to infer them. The discrete variables are reported as numbers (percentages) and the Chi-squared test is applied to them. Statistical analyses were performed by the SPSS software (V.26, IBM) with a considering significance criterion of 0.05. Statistically differences were not found in postoperative inflammatory and infectious complications among the two groups (P>0.05) including SIRS score (P=0.385), WBC (P=0.589), IL-6 (P=0.365), ESR (P=0.171), CRP (P=0.279), Platelet (P=0.501), positive urine culture (P=0.922), and post-operative fever (P=0.162). Administering antibiotic-loaded irrigation fluid was as safe and effective as IV ceftriaxone in TUL and could be a reasonable alternative for IV antibiotics.

The mayo adhesive probability score predicts postoperative fever and sepsis in retrograde intrarenal surgery

Infectious complications are among the most common and potentially life-threatening morbidities of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Few predictive tools on these complications include radiological signs. The Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score is an image-based scoring system that incorporates two radiological signs: perinephric fat stranding and perinephric fat thickness. Previous studies have suggested an association between these signs and febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) following lithotripsy. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive factors, including the MAP score, for post-RIRS fever and sepsis. A total of 260 patients who underwent 306 RIRS between October 2019 to December 2023 due to renal or upper ureteral stones were included in this retrospective study. Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, stone factors, radiological signs, and MAP scores were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with postoperative fever and sepsis. Postoperative fever and sepsis occurred in 20.8% and 8.5% of the patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, female gender, history of recurrent UTI, larger maximal stone diameter, and higher MAP score were independent risk factors for postoperative fever and sepsis. Identifying the risk factors for post-RIRS infectious complications is imperative to providing the proper perioperative management. The MAP score is a promising, easily calculated, image-based scoring system that predicts post-RIRS fever and sepsis.

Ureterorenoscopic Stone Removal without Antibiotic Prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of sparing routine antibiotic prophylaxis in patients without preoperative urinary tract infection undergoing ureterorenoscopy (URS) for stone removal.

METHODS

A retrospective, monocentric study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of a modified perioperative antibiotic management strategy according to the principles of antibiotic stewardship. Patients with preoperative unremarkable urine culture received no antibiotic prophylaxis for URS stone removal (NoPAP). The NoPAP group was compared to a historic URS cohort, when antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) was standard of care. Analysis focused on postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Postoperative fever occurred in 1% of the NoPAP and 2% of the PAP patients (p = 0.589). Clavien 1-3 complications did not differ between groups with 9% in the NoPAP and 6.2% in the PAP (p = 0.159). No Clavien 4-5 complications were seen. We identified a residual stone (p = 0.033) and an ASA score 3-4 (p = 0.004) as significant risk factors for postoperative fever. By sparing routine antibiotic prophylaxis, the overall antibiotic usage was reduced from 100% (PAP) to 8.3% (NoPAP).

CONCLUSION

Sparing a routine antibiotic prophylaxis during URS for stone removal seems feasible in patients with unremarkable preoperative urine culture for most of the patients. A prospective validation is warranted.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in urologic interventions: Who, when, where?

BACKGROUND

Periprocedural prophylaxis in medicine encompasses the set of measures (physical, chemical, and pharmacological) used to reduce the risk of infection. Antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) refers to the administration of a short-term regimen of antibiotics shortly before a medical procedure to reduce the risk of infectious complications that can result from diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The outspreading growth of multidrug-resistant bacterial species and changes in the bacterial local ecosystem have impeded the development of a unique scheme of AP in urology.

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature and current guidelines regarding AP for urological diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and to define agents, timing, and occasions when administering pharmacological prophylaxis. Secondly, according to current literature, to open new scenarios where AP can be useful or useless.

RESULTS

Major gaps in evidence still exist in this field. AP appears useful in many invasive procedures and some sub-populations at risk of infectious complications. AP is not routinely recommended for urodynamic exams, diagnostic cystoscopy, and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. The available data regarding the use of AP during the transperineal prostate biopsy are still unclear; conversely, in the case of the transrectal approach AP is mandatory. AP is still considered the gold standard for the prevention of postoperative infective complications in the case of ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, endoscopic resection of bladder tumor, endoscopic resection of the prostate, and prosthetic or major surgery.

CONCLUSION

The review highlights the complexity of determining the appropriate candidates for AP, emphasizing the importance of considering patient-specific factors such as comorbidities, immunocompetence, and the nature of the urologic intervention. The evidence suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be suitable, and a tailored strategy based on the specific procedure and patient characteristics is essential.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Ureteroscopy and ureterorenoscopy

Technical advances, including miniaturization, have improved the deflection and optical performance of the ureteroscopes, and the availability of dedicated disposable devices have led to their increasing use for kidney and ureteral stone management. Ureterorenoscopy brings diagnostic evidence through the endoscopic description of stones and renal papillary abnormalities. Currently, intracorporeal lithotripsy during ureterorenoscopy is based on laser sources. Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary before ureterorenoscopy, especially because preoperative stenting for>30 days is considered as an independent risk factor of infection. Ureteral access sheaths allow the easy and repeated access to the upper urinary tract and thus facilitate ureterorenoscopy. Their use improves vision, decreases intrarenal pressure, and possibly reduces the operative time, but they may cause ureteral injury. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether or not the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis [EAU 2022]) and their adaptability to the French context.

Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial Using Next-generation Microbial Sequencing to Direct Prophylactic Antibiotic Choice Before Urologic Stone Lithotripsy Using an Interprofessional Model

Background

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods for microbial profiling have increased sensitivity to detect urinary pathogens.

Objective

To determine whether NGS microbial profiling can be used to guide antibiotic prophylaxis and reduce infection compared with the standard of care.

Design setting and participants

A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial of patients undergoing urologic stone interventions at an academic health center from December 2019 to January 2022 was conducted. Urine was collected at the preoperative visit for standard culture and intervention NGS diagnostics. Evaluable patients were culture negative, met 2-wk follow-up, and did not cancel surgery. Of 240 individuals (control = 121, intervention = 119), 83 control and 74 intervention patients were evaluable.

Intervention

Microbial findings (paired quantitative polymerase chain reaction and NGS) were sent to an infectious disease pharmacist to recommend prophylactic antimicrobial regimen.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The primary outcome was postoperative urinary infection within the follow-up period (Fisher's exact test). The primary outcome was analyzed by modified intent-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol analyses. Secondary endpoints considered included positive culture concordance, antibiotic use, and adverse events. Additional post hoc analyses investigated factors contributing to infection (univariate logistic regression).

Results and limitations

The intervention significantly reduced postsurgical urinary infection risk by 7.1% (-0.73%, 15%) compared with the standard of care in the mITT analysis (1.4% vs 8.4%, p = 0.045) or by 8.5% (0.88%, 16%) compared with the per-protocol analysis (0% vs 8.5%, p = 0.032). NGS-guided treatment altered the distribution of antibiotics used (p = 0.025), and antibiotics poorly matched with NGS findings were associated with increased infection odds (odds ratio [OR] = 5.9, p = 0.046). Women were at greater odds to develop infection (OR = 10, p = 0.03) and possessed differentiated microbial profiles (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Urinary microbial NGS-guided antibiotic prophylaxis before endoscopic urologic stone lithotripsy improves antibiotic selection to reduce healthcare-associated urinary infections; however, treatment efficacy may be limited by the ability to adhere to the recommended protocol.

Patient summary

We investigated whether microbial DNA sequencing could improve the selection of antibiotics before kidney stone surgery in patients not known to have any bacteria in the urine on standard culture. We found that using microbe DNA to guide antibiotic choices decreased postoperative infection rate and may encourage individualized use of available antibiotics.

Evidence-based guideline for the prevention and management of perioperative infection

BACKGROUND

We have updated the guideline for preventing and managing perioperative infection in China, given the global issues with antimicrobial resistance and the need to optimize antimicrobial usage and improve hospital infection control levels.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence for prevention and management of perioperative infection, based on the concepts of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of recommendations was graded and voted using the Delphi method and the nominal group technique. Revisions were made to the guidelines in response to feedback from the experts.

RESULTS

There were 17 questions prepared, for which 37 recommendations were made. According to the GRADE system, we evaluated the body of evidence for each clinical question. Based on the meta-analysis results, recommendations were graded using the Delphi method to generate useful information.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline provides evidence to perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis that increased the rational use of prophylactic antimicrobial use, with substantial improvement in the risk-benefit trade-off.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery

OBJECTIVES

To set out the second in a series of guidelines on the treatment of urolithiasis by the International Alliance of Urolithiasis that concerns retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), with the aim of providing a clinical framework for urologists performing RIRS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After a comprehensive search of RIRS-related literature published between 1 January 1964 and 1 October 2021 from the PubMed database, systematic review and assessment were performed to inform a series of recommendations, which were graded using modified GRADE methodology. Additionally, quality of evidence was classified using a modification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence system. Finally, related comments were provided.

RESULTS

A total of 36 recommendations were developed and graded that covered the following topics: indications and contraindications; preoperative imaging; preoperative ureteric stenting; preoperative medications; peri-operative antibiotics; management of antithrombotic therapy; anaesthesia; patient positioning; equipment; lithotripsy; exit strategy; and complications.

CONCLUSION

The series of recommendations regarding RIRS, along with the related commentary and supporting documentation, offered here should help provide safe and effective performance of RIRS.

Comparison of vacuum suction ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and traditional ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted upper ureteral stones

PURPOSE

To compare a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (VS-URS) with traditional ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (T-URS) for impacted upper ureteral stones and to better define the potential benefits of VS-URS.

METHODS

Between May 2019 and March 2021, 158 patients with impacted upper ureteral stones underwent ureteroscopic holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy. Of these, 76 underwent VS-URS and 82 underwent T-URS. In VS-URS procedures, the vacuum suction device is composed of a 5F ureteral catheter and a tee joint. The ureteral catheter is linked to the vacuum aspirator by the sidearm of the tee joint, and a 200 μm fiber is inserted through the tee joint and the ureteral catheter into the stone site for lithotripsy.

RESULTS

When compared to the T-URS group, the VS-URS group had a shorter mean operation time (38.18 ± 6.37 min vs. 46.65 ± 5.66 min; P = 0.000), lower fever rate (3.9% vs. 14.6%; P < 0.022), less stone retropulsion (5.3% vs. 18.3%; P = 0.012), lower extra management rate (6.58% vs. 21.95%; P = 0.006), and a higher stone-free rate of the first postoperative day (88.2% vs. 72.0%; P = 0.011). There were no significant differences in stone-free rates 1 month after surgery between groups (94.7% vs. 92.7%; P = 0.748).

CONCLUSIONS

VS-URS is an effective modality for impacted upper ureteral stones, and has a shorter operating time, lower fever rate, less stone retropulsion, and a higher primary stone-free rate compared with T-URS.

Retrospective Analysis of the Risk Factors and Drug Resistance of Pathogenic Bacteria in Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Impacted Ureteral Calculi

Objective

To investigate the risk factors, pathogen distribution, and drug resistance of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after holmium laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy for impacted ureteral calculi (HLULIUC).

Patients and Methods

The clinical data of 293 patients with HLULIUC in our hospital from October 2017 to February 2021 were retrospectively collected, including age, BMI, stone size, operation time, urine routine, urine culture, basic illness, complete blood count, liver and kidney function, etc. Patients were divided into SIRS and non-SIRS groups according to whether they had SIRS or not. Then the differences in clinical data, blood and urine bacterial culture results, and drug resistance between the two groups were analyzed.

Results

The incidence of SIRS after HLULIUC was 17.75%. Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors of SIRS after HLULIUC include ureteral calculi≥1cm (OR=2.839, 95% CI=1.341–5.647, P=0.021), long operation time (OR=4.534, 95% CI=2.597–12.751, P=0.017), diabetes mellitus (OR=3.137, 95% CI=1.142–7.319, P=0.012), increased preoperative C-reactive protein (OR=1.864, 95% CI=1.05–4.347, P=0.032), and positive urine leukocytes (OR=3.514, 95% CI=1.7237–9.734, P=0.007) and culture (OR=6.034, 95% CI=3.097–15.751, P<0.001) before operation. The main pathogens causing SIRS after HLULIUC were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The pathogenic bacteria are sensitive to drugs including piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, tigecycline, teicoplanin, vancomycin, and imipenem. The resistance rates to quinolones (such as levofloxacin) and to the second- and third-generations of cephalosporins were as high as 52.94%–90.19%.

Conclusion

Ureteral calculi≥1cm, long operation time, diabetes, increased C-reactive protein, and preoperative positive urine leukocytes and culture are independent risk factors of SIRS after HLULIUC. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the main pathogenic bacteria for SIRS after HLULIUC. The pathogenic bacteria are sensitive to drugs, including piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, tigecycline, teicoplanin, vancomycin, and imipenem.

Effect of asymptomatic bacteriuria on readmissions and rate of urosepsis after ureterorenoscopy for urolithiasis

Objective:

This study aims to assess whether the rate of readmissions after ureterorenoscopy (URS) is dependent on results of urine microscopy, culture and sensitivity (MC&S) or nitrite dipstick test performed before the procedure.

Patients and Methods:

All patients attending for ureteroscopy for stone disease over 12 months were included and had urine dipstick performed immediately prior to the surgery with mid-stream urine (MSU) sample sent for culture. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) was not treated before ureteroscopy. All included patients received standard antibiotic prophylaxis. Readmissions within 30 days of the procedure were evaluated.

Results:

A total 120 ureteroscopies were included, of which 20% had ABU. Eight patients (6.67%) were readmitted due to all procedure-related complications; among them, five (4.17%) were readmitted with urinary tract infection (UTI). Readmission rates with UTIs were similar for patients with sterile urine and those who had untreated ABU. Of those patients who were readmitted with UTI, all had a negative nitrite result on preoperative urine dipstick specimens. Most patients (54.17%) who had ABU also had a negative urinary nitrite test.

Conclusions:

Screening and routine treatment of ABU before ureteroscopy for urolithiasis may be unnecessary provided patients have standard antibiotic prophylaxis. Moreover, urine nitrite testing before ureteroscopy may not be a useful screening test for ABU before ureteroscopy.

Level of evidence:

2

Prevention and Management of Infectious Complications of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Kidney stone disease (KSD) is a commonly encountered ailment in urologic practice. Urinary tract infection (UTI) is commonly associated with KSD, both as an etiology (e.g., struvite and carbonate apatite stones), and as a complication (i.e., obstructive pyelonephritis and post-operative UTI). Indeed, a significant portion of the economic burden of KSD is skewed toward stones associated with infection. UTI is the most common post-operative complication related to stone intervention with progression to urosepsis as a rare but serious consequence. Risk for infection is influenced by a variety of factors including co-morbid conditions, anatomic abnormalities, prior surgical procedures, and local anti-microbial susceptibility. Understanding these risks and the proper steps to mitigate them is an essential component in reducing post-operative morbidity and mortality. Retrograde intrarenal surgery is routinely used for the treatment of KSD. The objective of this review article is to examine the current literature and guidelines for the prevention and management of stone-related infectious complications associated with retrograde intrarenal surgery. Special attention will be given to the incidence, etiology, and antibiotic prophylaxis choice in the management of stone-related infections. Intraoperative risk mitigation techniques will be discussed in conjunction with the management of post-operative infections. Antibiotic stewardship and the potential benefits of reduced empiric antibiotic treatment will also be discussed.

The clinical efficacy of novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm.

RESULTS

All operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3-5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased.

Decreased Flow-Mediated Dilatation in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) is a strong risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is an early noninvasive marker of endothelial function and it predicts future cardiovascular disease. However, the changes in FMD among T1DM children are still controversial. The present meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether FMD is impaired in children with T1DM. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing FMD in children with T1DM and healthy controls. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale for case-control studies was used to assess study quality. Data were pooled using a random effects models to obtain the weighted mean differences (WMD) in FMD and 95% CIs. Overall, 19 studies with 1245 patients and 872 healthy controls were included in this meta-analysis. Children with T1DM had significantly lower FMDs compared with healthy controls (WMD: -2.58; 95% CI: -3.36 to -1.81; P < .001). Meta-regression analysis revealed that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels impacted the observed difference in FMD between T1DM and healthy children. This meta-analysis showed that T1DM children have impaired endothelial function, which indicates they are at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease in later life.

How does pre-operative antimicrobial treatment influence the intra-operative culture results and infectious complications in patients with positive baseline bladder urine culture undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy?

We investigated how pre-operative antimicrobial treatment influenced intra-operative culture (IC) results and infectious complications in patients with positive pre-operative bladder urine culture (PBUC) undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. We assessed 162 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy from April 2019 to March 2020. Based on PBUC findings, they were divided into positive and negative PBUC groups. We administered pre-operative antimicrobial treatment to the positive PBUC group and only peri-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis to the negative PBUC group. We examined intra-operative cultures (ICs), including bladder urine culture, renal pelvic urine culture and stone culture, in all cases. We studied the association between the results of PBUC, ICs and infectious complications in both groups. A total of 67 and 95 patients had positive and negative PBUC, respectively. In the positive PBUC group, 19 (28.4%) patients still had positive bladder urine culture after the antibiotic treatment. Positive ICs (43.3% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001) and post-operative fever (16.4% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.001) were more common in the positive PBUC group than in the negative PBUC group. In the positive PBUC group, 11 patients had a post-operative fever, regardless of the ICs results (6 positive ICs and 5 negative ICs). Furthermore, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria were detected from ICs in 5 patients with positive PBUC, including 4 suffering from a post-operative fever. Although the effect of pre-operative antimicrobial treatment is not definitive, to avoid serious infectious complications, we should recognize high-risk patients and perform more careful infection control based on the pre- and intra-operative culture results.

Recommended antibiotic prophylaxis regimen in retrograde intrarenal surgery: evidence from a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To study the incidence of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) following different antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) regimens in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-centre, randomised, controlled trial (August 2014-September 2017) including 426 patients with renal stones with preoperative sterile urine managed by RIRS (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02304822). Different ciprofloxacin-based ABP regimens were used and included a zero dose, single dose (30 min before surgery) or two doses (first dose at 30 min before RIRS and additional dose within 6 h after RIRS). The incidence of SIRS was compared using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.

RESULTS

Each group enrolled 142 patients. In the ITT analysis, a zero dose of ABP was statistically similar to the two ABP regimes for the incidence of SIRS (9.9% vs single dose 4.9%, P = 0.112; vs two doses 4.2%, P = 0.062). There were also no relevant differences across groups in the PP analysis; no urosepsis was recorded. In subgroup analysis with stratification by stone area, the three regimens all had a low and similar incidence of SIRS for stones of ≤200 mm² in the ITT analysis with a sufficient power value (5.4% vs 6.2% vs 3.6%, P = 0.945 vs single dose and P = 0.553 vs two doses). However, there was a greater chance of SIRS in patients who received no ABP with stones of >200 mm² (18% vs single dose 4.3%, P = 0.036; vs two doses 5.5%, P = 0.044). Similar trends were seen in the PP analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with preoperative sterile urine, ABP is not strongly recommended in patients with stones of ≤200 mm² , but for stones >200 mm² single-dose ABP is still required.