Review: The impact of pediatric mental health care provided outpatient, primary care, community and school settings on emergency department use - a systematic review

Health equity in pediatrics: Current concepts for the care of children in the 21st century (Dis Mon)

This is an analysis of important aspects of health equity in caring for children and adolescents written by a multidisciplinary team from different medical centers. In this discussion for clinicians, we look at definitions of pediatric health equity and the enormous impact of social determinants of health in this area. Factors involved with pediatric healthcare disparities that are considered include race, ethnicity, gender, age, poverty, socioeconomic status, LGBT status, living in rural communities, housing instability, food insecurity, access to transportation, availability of healthcare professionals, the status of education, and employment as well as immigration. Additional issues involved with health equity in pediatrics that are reviewed will include the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, behavioral health concepts, and the negative health effects of climate change. Recommendations that are presented include reflection of one's own attitudes on as well as an understanding of these topics, consideration of the role of various healthcare providers (i.e., community health workers, peer health navigators, others), the impact of behavioral health integration, and the need for well-conceived curricula as well as multi-faceted training programs in pediatric health equity at the undergraduate and postgraduate medical education levels. Furthermore, ongoing research in pediatric health equity is needed to scrutinize current concepts and stimulate the development of ideas with an ever-greater positive influence on the health of our beloved children. Clinicians caring for children can serve as champions for the optimal health of children and their families; in addition, these healthcare professionals are uniquely positioned in their daily work to understand the drivers of health inequities and to be advocates for optimal health equity in the 21st century for all children and adolescents.

Dynamic modelling of the impact of community-based acute mental health services for children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential impact of the recently announced 'Safeguards' initiative on mental health-related emergency department presentation rates for children and adolescents (0-17 years). This state-funded initiative aims to establish 25 Child and Adolescent Acute Response Teams across New South Wales.

METHODS

We estimated the effects of the 'Safeguards' initiative using a state-level dynamic model of child and adolescent acute mental health care. Potential reductions in total numbers of mental health-related emergency department presentations and re-presentations (i.e. presentations within 3 months of an initial presentation) were assessed via a series of simulation experiments in which we systematically varied the total number of Child and Adolescent Acute Response Teams and the mean duration of care per patient.

RESULTS

Assuming a mean treatment duration of 6 weeks per patient, 25 Child and Adolescent Acute Response Teams are projected to reduce total numbers of mental health-related emergency department presentations and re-presentations over the period 2022-2031 by 15.0% (95% interval, 12.0-18.2%) and 31.7% (26.2-37.8%), respectively. Increasing the total number of Child and Adolescent Acute Response Teams above 25 has minimal additional impact on projected reductions in numbers of emergency department presentations and re-presentations, provided the mean duration of care is no more than 8 weeks. However, where the mean duration of care is greater than 4 weeks, a decrease in the number of Child and Adolescent Acute Response Teams below 25 reduces the potential effectiveness of the 'Safeguards' initiative significantly.

CONCLUSION

Our simulation results indicate that full and timely implementation will be critical if the potentially substantial impact of the 'Safeguards' initiative on demand for hospital-based emergency mental health care is to be realised.

Getting the pieces to fit: NHS and third sector collaboration to enhance crisis mental health service provision for young people

BACKGROUND

The increase in demand for young people's mental health services has been met by a growth of co-located mental health service provision in the NHS and third sector. This research explores the benefits and challenges of the NHS collaborating with a charity to provide a step-down crisis mental health service for young people in Greater Manchester, and suggests how the collaboration between the NHS and third sector may be improved for future projects.

METHODS

Working from a critical realist paradigm, this qualitative case study utilised thematic analysis of 9 in-depth interviews with operational stakeholders from 3 operational layers, to explore insiders' perspectives of the benefits and challenges of collaboration between the NHS and third sector in the context of the 'Safe Zones' initiative.

RESULTS

Themes relating to perceived benefits of collaboration were: doing things differently, flexibility, a hybrid approach, shared expertise, and shared learning. These were counterbalanced by perceived challenges: getting the pieces to fit, obtaining a shared vision, geography, lack of referrals, and timing. The importance of effective communication (e.g. of shared vision, standard operating procedures, key performance indicators) was noted as central to addressing challenges and reaping benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

NHS and third sector collaboration can yield a range of benefits, some of which can mitigate against the perceived inflexibility and restrictive nature of usual mental health service provision, thereby providing a vehicle for innovation in step-down crisis care for young people.

Comparing youth with vs without outpatient mental health services on subsequent acute mental health care visits

BACKGROUND

Use of acute care for mental health concerns has been increasing among youth in recent years. Improving access to outpatient mental health services may prevent downstream acute care visits.

PURPOSE

To examine differences in rates of acute mental health care visits among youth with- versus without prior outpatient mental health services.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 2,442 youth ages 14-17 years participated in a provincially representative cross-sectional epidemiological survey, the 2014 Ontario Child Health Study. This sample was individually linked to health administrative databases, with nearly universal coverage of all medically necessary physician and acute care visits. Our exposure was parent and youth reported outpatient mental health service use in the six-month period prior to completing the survey. Exposed youth (n=691) were matched with unexposed youth using a propensity score informed by a range of clinical and socio-demographic factors. Our outcome was acute mental health care visits in the 18-month period following completion of the survey, ascertained though the linked health administrative data.

RESULTS

In our propensity score matched sample, we found no difference in rates of subsequent acute mental health care visits (HR= 1.14, 95%CI 0.44, 2.98) between youth with- versus without prior outpatient mental health services.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to further understand the types of services youth are receiving in outpatient settings to determine if, and for whom, outpatient mental health services reduces the likelihood of future acute mental health care visits.

The Longitudinal Youth in Transition Study (LYiTS) Cohort Profile: Exploration by Hospital- Versus Community-Based Mental Health Services

OBJECTIVES

Youth face numerous challenges in receiving coordinated and continuous mental health services, particularly as they reach the age of transition from child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) to adult mental health services (AMHS). The Longitudinal Youth in Transition Study (LYiTS) follows youth prospectively as they cross this transition boundary to better understand their transition pathways and resulting symptoms and health service use outcomes. The current paper presents the baseline profile description for the LYiTS cohort and additionally examines differences in symptoms and functioning and health service utilization between youth receiving services at hospital- versus community-based CAMHS.

METHODS

A cross-sectional design was used. A sample of 237 16-18-year-old youth recruited from outpatient CAMHS at two hospitals and two community sites completed self-report measures at their first of four annual assessments. A latent profile analysis was conducted to identify symptomology profiles, and youth were compared on symptoms and health service use between hospital- and community-based sites.

RESULTS

Four distinct symptomology profiles were identified (subclinical, moderate internalizing, moderate externalizing, and high symptomology). Symptom profiles and functioning levels reported by youth were no different across both types of organization, although there were differences detected in health service utilization, such as type of provider seen and use of medications.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that there is little difference in symptomology between youth accessing hospital versus community-based CAMHS. With growing interest in understanding the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different models of mental health care, these findings provide a new understanding of the clinical and service use profiles of transition-aged youth that will be explored further as this cohort is followed across the CAMHS to AMHS transition boundary.

Emergency Department Use by Children and Youth with Mental Health Conditions: A Health Equity Agenda

There are growing concerns regarding the referral of children and youth with mental health conditions to emergency departments (EDs). These focus on upward trends in utilization, uncertainty about benefits and negative effects of ED visits, and inequities surrounding this form of care. A review was conducted to identify and describe available types of data on ED use. The authors' interpretation of the literature is that it offers compelling evidence that children and youth in the U.S. are being sent to EDs for mental health conditions at increasing rates for reasons frequently judged as clinically inappropriate. As a major health inequity, it is infrequent that such children and youth are seen in EDs by a behavioral health professional or receive evidence-based assessment or treatment, even though they are kept in EDs far longer than those seen for reasons unrelated to mental health. The rate of increase in these referrals to EDs appears much greater for African American and Latinx children and youth than White children and is increasing for the publicly insured and uninsured while decreasing for the privately insured. A comprehensive set of strategies are recommended for improving healthcare quality and health equity. A fact sheet is provided for use by advocates in pressing this agenda.

Emergency health services use and medically-treated suicidal behaviors following depression screening among adolescents: A longitudinal cohort study

The primary goal of depression screening is to reduce adverse psychiatric outcomes, which may have downstream implications for reducing avoidable health services use. The objective of this study was to examine the association of depression screening with emergency health services use and medically-treated suicidal behaviors among adolescents in the U.S. This longitudinal cohort study used insurance claims data from 57,732 adolescents who had at least one well-visit between 2014 and 2017. Propensity score matching was used to compare adolescents who were screened for depression to similar adolescents who were not screened for depression during the well-visit. Outcomes were examined over two-year follow-up and included emergency department use and inpatient hospitalizations for depression-related reasons, mental health-related reasons, and any reason as well as medically-treated suicidal behaviors. Log-binomial regression models were used to examine associations between depression screening and each outcome in the matched sample. Heterogeneity of associations by sex was examined with interaction terms. Being screened for depression was not consistently associated with emergency department use (depression-related reasons: RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.76-1.30; mental health-related reasons: RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.80-1.29; any reason: RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.83-1.11), inpatient hospitalizations (depression-related reasons: RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.84-1.31; mental health-related reasons: RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.00-1.33; any reason: RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.99-1.12), or medically-treated suicidal behaviors (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.51-1.36). Associations were similar in magnitude among male and female adolescents. The results of this study suggest that depression screening, as it is currently practiced in the U.S., may not deter avoidable health services use among adolescents.

The relationship between outpatient service use and emergency department visits among people treated for mental and substance use disorders: analysis of population-based administrative data in British Columbia, Canada

Background

Research findings on the association between outpatient service use and emergency department (ED) visits for mental and substance use disorders (MSUDs) are mixed and may differ by disorder type.

Methods

We used population-based linked administrative data in British Columbia, Canada to examine associations between outpatient primary care and psychiatry service use and ED visits among people ages 15 and older, comparing across people treated for three disorder categories: common mental disorders (MDs) (depressive, anxiety, and/or post-traumatic stress disorders), serious MDs (schizophrenia spectrum and/or bipolar disorders), and substance use disorders (SUDs) in 2016/7. We used hurdle models to examine the association between outpatient service use and odds of any ED visit for MSUDs as well count of ED visits for MSUDs, stratified by cohort in 2017/8.

Results

Having had one or more MSUD-related primary care visit was associated with lower odds of any ED visit among people treated for common MDs and SUDs but not people treated for serious MDs. Continuity of primary care was associated with slightly lower ED use in all cohorts. One or more outpatient psychiatrist visits was associated with lower odds of ED visits among people treated for serious MDs and SUDs, but not among people with common MDs.

Conclusion

Findings highlight the importance of expanded access to outpatient specialist mental health services, particularly for people with serious MDs and SUDs, and collaborative models that can support primary care providers treating people with MSUDs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07759-z.

Deconstructing The Rise In Mental Health-Related ED Visits Among Children And Youth In Ontario, Canada

Mental illness is a leading cause of disability among youth. In Ontario, Canada, rates of mental health or addiction-related emergency department (ED) visits continue to rise in children and youth; however, it is unclear what is driving this change. We deconstructed this trend by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, using linked health administrative data sets. Mental health or addiction-related ED visit rates increased by 89.1 percent between 2006 and 2017, with the greatest rise observed for those ages 14-21, high-acuity cases, and anxiety and mood disorders. We observed a significantly sharp increase after 2009, when several socioenvironmental changes occurred, including the emergence of social media and the Great Recession. Our findings of greater numbers of teenagers and young adults experiencing mental health problems and a shift in acuity and diagnoses have important implications for both ED staffing and outpatient mental illness prevention efforts. Further research is needed to examine whether better case management, care coordination, and after-hours services will help reverse these trends.

Innovation in Primary Healthcare in the Twenty-first Century

COVID-19 once again has shown the world the importance of an urgent need for revitalising the health system based on a strong primary healthcare foundation. It is clear that without a community-based grassroots level care delivery system, Test, Trace and Isolation may not be an effective operational possibility. Politics of health with consequent austerity programme and dependence on secondary hospital care–based system has proved to be ineffective and costly in meeting the changing demands for healthcare of the population. Demographic and epidemiological transition with the increasing burden of chronic care; unfinished agenda of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and the new challenge of achieving Sustainable Development Gaos (SDGs), including Universal Health Care; improving quality along with access to care; and addressing the existing inequity in healthcare service, politicians and public health leaders must realise and invest in people-centred, need-based primary healthcare. Significant and sustained productivity gains can be made through various innovations that can change how quality services are delivered and reduce inequity. In order for primary healthcare to become fit for purpose, it must improve its allocative, technical and service delivery efficiencies; effectiveness and responsiveness of care; access, quality and equity of care; and have an inbuilt monitoring and accountability framework. The system must create a conducive political, social and service delivery environment for innovations. Today, developing countries, as well as developed countries, are all strengthening their primary healthcare system through various innovations to maximise the use of scarce resources to reach all people who need care and minimising cost, wastage and inefficiencies.

Trends in Psychiatric Emergency Department Visits Among Youth and Young Adults in the US

BACKGROUND

Visits to the emergency department (ED) for psychiatric purposes are an indicator of chronic and acute unmet mental health needs. In the current study, we examined if psychiatric ED visits among individuals 6 to 24 years of age are increasing nationwide.

METHODS

ED data came from the 2011-2015 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a national survey of ED visits across the United States. Psychiatric ED visits were identified by using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and reason-for-visit codes. Survey-weighted logistic regression analyses were employed to examine trends in as well as correlates of psychiatric ED visits. Data from the US Census Bureau were used to examine population rates.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2015, there was a 28% overall increase (from 31.3 to 40.2) in psychiatric ED visits per 1000 youth in the United States. The largest increases in psychiatric ED visits per 1000 US youth were observed among adolescents (54%) and African American (53%) and Hispanic patients (91%). A large increase in suicide-related visits (by 2.5-fold) was observed among adolescents (4.6-11.7 visits per 1000 US youth). Although psychiatric ED visits were long (51% were ≥3 hours in length), few (16%) patients were seen by a mental health professional during their visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Visits to the ED for psychiatric purposes among youth are rising across the United States. Psychiatric expertise and effective mental health treatment options, particular those used to address the rising suicide epidemic among adolescents, are needed in the ED.

Editorial: The future of crisis mental health services for children and young people

The future of mental health services for children and young people are at a turning point. There is increasing recognition that there is huge unmet need. In the UK only approximately 25% of children and young people with a mental health disorder receive treatment, but demand to access care is increasing. At the same time evidence is building on what treatments are effective. This has not been matched by equivalent research evidence on what service configurations are most effective. In their systematic review of 'the impact of pediatric mental health care provided in outpatient, primary care, community and school settings on emergency department use', Kirkland et al (2018) found only limited evidence to suggest that the provision of services in the community impact on the use of emergency departments. The absence of robust RCT evidence should not prevent us from improving the outcomes and experience of children and young people facing a mental health crisis. Much is known about the value of early intervention and effective community interventions. Action should be taken now to prioritise the use of scarce resources where they are needed most to reduce unnecessary and sometimes unhelpful attendances at emergency departments and avoid potentially harmful mental health admissions.