Association between 24-hour combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and symptoms or quality of life in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux

Development of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Therapeutic Responses in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

OBJECTIVES

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a challenging condition requiring effective treatment. Thus, understanding the factors that influence therapeutic response in LPRD is crucial. This study leverages machine learning models to predict the therapeutic responses and identify the key influencing factors in LPRD.

METHODS

Patients with typical LPRD symptoms showing more than one pharyngeal reflux episode on 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH monitoring were collected retrospectively from two independent otolaryngologic clinics. Patients who were prescribed proton pump inhibitor therapy and followed up for at least 2 months were included. Patients who showed a ≥50% decrease in the follow-up reflux symptom index score during treatment periods compared with pre treatment were defined as responders. Among various demographic and 24-hour MII-pH monitoring parameters, features showing the absolute correlation coefficients ≥0.1 with response were selected. Four machine learning models-logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and gradient boosting-were applied to the training cohort and assessed in the internal and external validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Patients from two otolaryngologic clinics were assigned to the internal dataset (n = 157) and external dataset (n = 53). All four models showed comparable predictive performances, illustrating their potential utility in clinical decision-making. Among them, the logistic regression model demonstrated the best performance with accuracy and F1 scores of 82.98% and 88.24% in the internal validation cohort and 84.91% and 86.21% in the external validation cohort predicting therapeutic responses in LPRD. Feature importance analysis revealed vital factors, such as proximal total reflux time and weak acid time, influencing therapeutic response, and offering insights into LPRD management.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insights into the factors influencing the therapeutic response in LPRD, underscoring the utility of machine learning in refining treatment strategies. Our findings suggest that integrating machine learning models into clinical practice can significantly improve LPRD management.

Medium-term clinical efficacy of endoscopic antireflux mucosectomy on laryngopharyngeal reflux: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Studies on the effect of antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) are lacking. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to explore the clinical efficacy of ARMS on LPRD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients diagnosed with LPRD by oropharyngeal 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring who underwent ARMS. The effects of ARMS on LPRD were evaluated by comparing the 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36), reflux symptom index (RSI), and 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring scores before and 1 year after surgery. Patients were divided into groups according to gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) grade to explore the effect of GEFV on prognosis.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three patients were included in the study. The oropharyngeal pH monitoring results showed that the effective rate of ARMS was 72.1% (132/183). After surgery, the SF-36 score was higher (P = .000), RSI score was lower (P = .000), and the symptoms of constant throat clearing; difficulty swallowing food, liquids, and pills; coughing after eating or after lying down; troublesome or annoying cough; and breathing difficulties or choking episodes were significantly improved (P < .05). Upright reflux was dominant in GEFV grade I to III patients, and the SF-36, RSI, and upright Ryan index scores were significantly improved after surgery (P < .05). In GEFV grade IV patients, regurgitation was dominant in the supine position, and the above evaluation indexes were worse after surgery (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

ARMS is effective for LPRD. The GEFV grade can predict the prognosis of surgery. ARMS is effective in GEFV grade I to III patients, but the effect is not exact in GEFV grade IV patients and may even be aggravated.

Quality of Life and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is characterized by the reflux of gastric contents into the pharynx or larynx and often presents with symptoms including but not limited to cough, throat clearing, sore throat, globus, and dysphonia. Unlike gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), LPR is a relatively understudied syndrome, and knowledge regarding the diagnostic and treatment strategies, as well as the psychosocial impact continues to evolve. No singular test or procedure currently exists as a gold standard for LPR diagnosis. While laryngoscopy or pH monitoring may be positive, this does not exclude the contribution of non-gastroenterological processes. Prior research into psychosocial impact demonstrates a significant increase in symptom burden when comparing patients with laryngeal symptoms to controls and those with isolated GERD symptoms. However, these data are limited by the absence of physiologic data to correlate with the reported symptoms and survey responses. This knowledge gap highlights the need for further research to investigate the relationship between symptom burden and pathologic acid reflux on quality of life (QOL), anxiety, and depression. Ultimately, future studies to directly analyze these variables will help to guide treatment strategies and improve QOL in these patients.

Submucosal Clustered Brownish Microvessels Based on NBI Endoscopy: A Characteristic of LPR

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) by using narrow band imaging (NBI) endoscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING

A large-volume practice with tertiary care providers.

METHODS

A total of 67 patients with suspected LPR who underwent 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring were included from June 2020 to March 2022. Manifestations of NBI endoscopy included submucosal clustered brownish microvessels (CBMs), spotted brownish microvessels, and no special microvessels; the latter 2 formed the non-CBM group. The manifestations of all patients and their changes were observed after 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor and symptomatic treatment for patients with LPR, and symptomatic treatment for patients without LPR.

RESULTS

According to the results of 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring, the incidence of submucosal CBMs was significantly higher in patients with LPR (30 cases) than in those without LPR (37 cases, P < .001), particularly in the posterior cricoid area (P < .001). Besides Reflux Finding Score, the incidence of signs such as subglottic edema and vocal fold edema was significantly higher in the CBM group than the non-CBM group (P < .05). Finally, 22 patients with LPR (91.7%) and only 2 patients without LPR (28.6%) underwent a transformation from CBMs to spotted brownish microvessels after continuous medication for 8 weeks in the CBM group (χ² = 15.916, P < .001), while no significant change was observed in patients with or without LPR in the non-CBM group (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Submucosal CBMs in the posterior cricoid area under NBI endoscopy may be a characteristic of LPR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Pharyngeal reflux episodes in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux versus healthy subjects: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze pharyngeal reflux episodes in patients with suspected LPR versus healthy subjects using 24-h MII-pH monitoring.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-one patients who visited our clinic with a chief complaint of LPR-related symptoms and underwent 24-h MII-pH monitoring were enrolled prospectively. Also, 27 healthy subjects were enrolled and underwent 24-h MII-pH monitoring during the same period. We analyzed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy comprehensively to determine appropriate cut-off values of pharyngeal reflux episodes in 24-h MII-pH monitoring to diagnose patients with LPR.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 121 patients with suspected LPR showed no pharyngeal reflux episodes, while 92 showed more than one pharyngeal reflux event. In contrast, the 22 healthy subjects showed no pharyngeal reflux episodes, three showed one reflux event, and two showed two reflux events. A cut-off value of ≥ 1 showed best accuracy reflected by combined sensitivity and specificity values, while ≥ 2 demonstrated better specificity with slight loss of sensitivity and slightly lower overall accuracy, suggesting cut-off value of ≥ 1 pharyngeal reflux episodes is a good clinical indicator.

CONCLUSION

A cut-off value of ≥ 1 in pharyngeal reflux episodes on 24-h MII-pH monitoring in patients with suspected LPR might be an acceptable diagnostic tool for LPR.

Prevalence and clinical significance of esophageal motility disorders in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Esophageal motor dysfunction may underlie impaired bolus/refluxate clearance in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility and its correlation with reflux parameters and symptoms in LPR is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of coexisting esophageal dysmotility among patients with suspected LPR.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 194 consecutive patients with LPR symptoms referred for high-resolution manometry (HRM) and combined hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH testing at a tertiary center in March 2018 to August 2019. Validated symptom surveys were prospectively collected at time of testing, including Reflux Symptom Index, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire, dominant symptom intensity, and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey. HRM findings were categorized using Chicago Classification v3.0.

RESULTS

Abnormal findings on HRM were identified in 84 (43.3%) patients, with ineffective esophageal motility (n = 60, 30.9%) as the most common diagnosis. A disorder of esophagogastric junction outflow or a major disorder of peristalsis was identified in 26 (13.4%) patients, including 2 (1%) with achalasia and 7 (3.6%) with jackhammer esophagus. Reflux burden (distal, proximal, or pharyngeal) on combined hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH testing did not differ across HRM findings. Patients reporting esophageal symptoms were more likely to have a primary motility disorder (odds ratio 2.34, P = 0.04). However, no significant differences in Reflux Symptom Index, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire, or 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey were noted across HRM diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal motility disorders are prevalent among patients with LPR symptoms, including up to one in seven with esophagogastric junction outflow or major peristaltic disorder. Patients with abnormal motility more likely report esophageal symptoms. Clinicians should be aware of these coexisting conditions, particularly in those with refractory symptoms.

24-Hour Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH in Proton Pump Inhibitor Nonresponders vs Responders in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of reflux in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) nonresponders vs responders in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) by using 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

A tertiary care otolaryngology clinic.

METHODS

Patients with typical LPR symptoms showing >1 proximal reflux episode were considered to have LPR and investigated prospectively. Patients were prescribed high-dose PPI twice daily and followed up for at least 2 months. Patients with LPR showing a ≥50% decrease in the follow-up reflux symptom index score during treatment periods as compared with pretreatment were defined as responders; others were defined as nonresponders. Various parameters in 24-hour MII-pH monitoring between nonresponders and responders with LPR were compared with Student's t test and receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were diagnosed with LPR and categorized as nonresponders (n = 19) and responders (n = 61). Proximal all reflux time and proximal longest reflux time in various MII parameters were higher in responders than in nonresponders (P = .0040 and .0216, respectively). Proximal all reflux time >0.000517% was a better cutoff value to predict responders with LPR as compared with the proximal longest reflux time >0.61 minutes (sensitivity + specificity: 1.317 vs 1.291).

CONCLUSION

Proximal all reflux time in various 24-hour MII-pH monitoring parameters can be helpful to predict the response to PPI therapy in patients with LPR. These findings will help establish a personalized therapeutic scheme for patients with LPR.

Poor consistency between reflux symptom index and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring in laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis in Chinese population

Background

It is unknown whether the reflux symptom index (RSI) can replace pH monitoring as a diagnostic tool for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in Chinese people. The relationships between reflux parameters and LPR symptoms also require further research.

Methods

A total of 216 Chinese patients underwent laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring and filled out an RSI questionnaire. Laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring indicated a diagnosis of LPR for patients with 7 or more episodes of reflux or a reflex area index (RAI) of 6.3 or more. The RSI questionnaire indicated a diagnosis of LPR for patients with RSI scores of 14 or higher.

Results

Of the 216 patients, 85 were diagnosed with LPR as assessed by the RSI, and 72 were diagnosed with LPR through laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring. The Cohen's kappa coefficient comparing LPR diagnosis consistency between RSI score and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring was 0.133 (P=0.007). This indicated the two diagnostic methods were consistent to a low degree; the total consistency rate was only 59.7% (129/216). The sensitivity of the RSI was 48.6% (35/72), and its specificity was 82.5% (94/114). For convenience, we named the nine symptom groups in the RSI sequentially as P1-P9. P1, P2, P3, P5, P6, and P7 were all correlated with at least one reflux parameter (P<0.05), but P4, P8, and P9 were not correlated with any reflux parameters (P>0.05). A total of 72 patients were diagnosed using pH monitoring, the gold standard for LPR diagnosis. The most common symptoms of LPR were found to be P9, P3, P8, P7, and P2 in these patients. The symptoms that most seriously affected patients were P9, P8, P3, P7, and P2.

Conclusions

The consistency in diagnosis of LPR between the RSI and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring was poor, meaning the RSI is not a suitable LPR initial screening tool and cannot replace pH monitoring. Additionally, reflux symptoms P4, P8, and P9 were not correlated with any reflux parameters. The most prevalent LPR symptom was P9, followed by P3, P8, P7, and P2. The most severe symptom was also P9, followed by P8, P3, P7, and P2.

Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Asia

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to investigate the current practices of Asian otolaryngologists for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

METHODS

An online survey about LPR was sent to 2,000 members of Asian otolaryngological societies, and a subgroup analysis was performed between Western and Eastern Asian otolaryngologists. The survey was conducted by the Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists of the International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies.

RESULTS

Among approximately 1,600 Asian otolaryngologists, 146 completed the survey (62 from Western Asian countries, 84 from Eastern Asian countries). A substantial majority (73.3%) of the otolaryngologists considered LPR and gastroesophageal reflux disease to be different diseases. The symptoms thought to be closely related to LPR were coughing after lying down, throat clearing, and globus sensation. The findings thought to be closely related to LPR were posterior commissure granulations and hypertrophy, arytenoids, and laryngeal erythema. The respondents indicated that they mostly diagnosed LPR (70%) after an empirical therapeutic trial of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Although multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring is a useful tool for diagnosing nonacid or mixed LPR, 78% of Asian otolaryngologists never or very rarely used MII-pH. Eastern Asian otolaryngologists more frequently used once-daily PPIs (64.3% vs. 45.2%, P=0.021), whereas Western Asian otolaryngologists preferred to use twice-daily PPIs (58.1% vs. 39.3%, P=0.025). The poor dietary habits of patients were considered to be the main reason for therapeutic failure by Asian otolaryngologists (53.8%). Only 48.6% of Asian otolaryngologists considered themselves to be adequately knowledgeable and skilled regarding LPR.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences exist between Western and Eastern Asian otolaryngologists in the diagnosis and treatment of LPR. Future consensus statements are needed to establish diagnostic criteria and therapeutic regimens.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux image quantization and analysis of its severity

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a prevalent disease affecting a high proportion of patients seeking laryngology consultation. Diagnosis is made subjectively based on history, symptoms, and endoscopic assessment. The results depend on the examiner's interpretation of endoscopic images. There are still no consistent objective diagnostic methods. The aim of this study is to use image processing techniques to quantize the laryngeal variation caused by LPR, to judge and analyze its severity. This study proposed methods of screening sharp images automatically from laryngeal endoscopic images and using throat eigen structure for automatic region segmentation. The proposed image compensation improved the illumination problems from the use of laryngoscope lens. Fisher linear discriminant was used to find out features and classification performance while support vector machine was used as the classifier for judging LPR. Evaluation results were 97.16% accuracy, 98.11% sensitivity, and 3.77% false positive rate. To evaluate the severity, quantized data of the laryngeal variation was used. LPR images were combined with reflux symptom index score chart, and severity was graded using a neural network. The results indicated 96.08% accuracy. The experiment indicated that laryngeal variation induced by LPR could be quantized by using image processing techniques to assist in diagnosing and treating LPR.

Changes in Pharyngeal Baseline Impedance in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Objective

Few studies have investigated pharyngeal intraluminal baseline impedance (BI) levels in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The aim of this study was to compare intraluminal BI levels between patients with LPR and healthy controls.

Study Design

Retrospective case series.

Setting

Tertiary care medical center.

Subjects and Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)–pH monitoring results from patients with suspected LPR complaining of reflux symptoms. Patients with suspected LPR were divided into 2 groups according to the 24-hour MII-pH monitoring (LPR group: patients with symptoms with reflux events ≥1, symptom but no reflux [SNR] group: patients with symptoms but no reflux event). Healthy controls were recruited and also underwent 24-hour MII-pH monitoring. We compared the esophageal and pharyngeal BI levels and ratios between 3 groups.

Results

Pharyngeal BI levels in the LPR group were significantly higher than in the healthy controls. In addition, the pharyngeal BI levels in the SNR group were significantly higher than in the healthy controls. All ratios of pharyngeal to distal esophageal BI levels in the LPR and SNR group were significantly higher than in the healthy controls. However, there were no significant differences in esophageal BI levels and ratios between the 3 groups.

Conclusion

We found that the pharyngeal BI levels were higher in patients with LPR than in healthy controls. In addition, the pharyngeal BI levels measured by 24-hour MII-pH monitoring in patients with LPR symptoms, but without a reflux episode, were higher than in the healthy controls.

Abnormal 24-hour pH-impedance Testing Does Not Predict Reduced Quality of Life in Children With Reflux Symptoms

OBJECTIVES

Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) have been associated with reduced health-related quality of life (QOL) in children, though it is unclear whether reflux burden on objective diagnostic testing, such as 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH (pH-MII) is associated with impaired QOL in children. Our aim was to identify predictors of QOL impairment based on the results of esophageal reflux testing.

METHODS

In this prospective, cross-sectional study of children undergoing pH-MII and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for evaluation of suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease, we collected validated questionnaires (Pediatric Gastroesophageal Symptom and Quality of Life Questionnaire [PGSQ], Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 [PedsQL] and PedsQL Gastrointestinal Symptoms Module [GI PedsQL]) to determine the relationship between objective measures of GER, patient-reported symptoms and QOL outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 82 subjects, 38% of children had an abnormal pH-MII study. There were no significant differences in QOL scores on any questionnaire between patients with normal and abnormal pH-MII studies (P > 0.11). There was no correlation between individual pH-MII parameters and QOL scores. Subjects with gross esophagitis on EGD reported significantly worse QOL with lower total PedsQL (P = 0.002) and GI PedsQL (P = 0.03) scores. Microscopic esophagitis was not associated with differences in QOL scores (P > 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no relationship between abnormalities on pH-MII testing and reduced QOL in children. These findings highlight the importance of considering other diagnoses beyond GERD as they may be significant drivers for QOL impairment.

Does the Reflux Symptom Index Predict Increased Pharyngeal Events on HEMII-pH Testing and Correlate with General Quality of Life?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the ability of the reflux symptom index (RSI) to predict objective impedance and pH-probe testing, and to examine the relationship between disease-specific and general health status in patients diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

METHODS

Adults presenting to a tertiary care academic center with a primary voice complaint completed the RSI and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-item global health instrument (PROMIS). An RSI score ≥13 was considered abnormal. Objective testing for LPR was performed using hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance catheter with dual pH (HEMII-pH) testing; a positive test was defined as more than one pharyngeal impedance events over 24 hours. Spearman rho analyses were applied, and the sensitivity and specificity of the RSI to detect HEMII-pH findings were determined.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients underwent HEMII-pH testing. Mean scores were 16.7 (95%CI 15.1-18.3) for RSI. Sixty-three (60.6%) patients were diagnosed with LPR by HEMII-pH testing. RSI scores were moderately correlated with PROMIS physical (Spearman rho 0.43, P < 0.0001), social (Spearman rho 0.33, P < 0.0001) and mental health (Spearman rho 0.33, P < 0.0001) scores. The RSI has a sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% and 31.7%, respectively, for detecting pharyngeal events on HEMII-pH testing.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate sensitivity and lack of specificity of the RSI for detecting increased pharyngeal reflux events. Reflux-specific and general health status instruments are correlated. Further investigation could assess the diagnostic ability of RSI compared proximal reflux events on HEMII-pH, as well as whether health status instruments can be used to detect clinically meaningful change in the LPR population.

Reflux characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough complicated by laryngopharyngeal reflux

Background

This study aimed to investigate the reflux characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough (GERC) complicated by laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Methods

Patients with chronic cough were recruited. Reflux symptom index (RSI) scoring, cough symptom scoring, assessment of capsaicin cough sensitivity, and multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII-pH) were performed.

Results

RSI score in GERC patients was significantly higher than that in patients with atopic cough (AC), cough variant asthma, eosinophilic bronchitis (EB), and upper airway cough syndrome (UACS) (P<0.05). The RSI score in non-acid GERC patients was significantly higher than that in acid GERC patients (P=0.003). The cut-off value of the RSI score was defined as 19 during diagnosis of non-acid GERC. In the RSI ≥19 group, there was more proximal reflux and more significant gas and non-acid reflux, and the efficacy of a combined use of baclofen or gabapentin was better than that of the RSI <19 group (P<0.05). The efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) at a routine dosage together with prokinetic agents in the RSI <19 group was better than that in the RSI ≥19 group (P=0.009).

Conclusions

LPR overlaps with GERC in part. GERC patients with higher RSI scores may present more proximal reflux, non-acid reflux, and gas reflux, and get better efficacy with neuromodulators (gabapentin or baclofen) used as an add-on therapy.

Gastroesophageal and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Associated With Laryngeal Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Gastric reflux may lead to chronic mucosal inflammation and contribute to development of laryngeal malignancies, although there is controversy over this association. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this relationship and determine the risk of laryngeal malignancy in patients with reflux disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases from 1900 through April 9, 2018, for observational studies of adults reporting associations between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and/or laryngopharyngeal reflux and the risk of having or developing laryngeal malignancies. An itemized assessment of the risk of bias was conducted for each study that met inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method with random effects to account for heterogeneity. We performed subgroup analyses to determine the effect of reflux type, study design, diagnostic method, and confounding variables on the overall risk.

RESULTS

Of the 957 studies that were identified during systematic review, 18 case-control studies met the criteria for analysis. Our meta-analysis showed that reflux disease significantly increased the risk of laryngeal malignancy (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.90-3.21; P < .00001; I² = 94%). This association remained when controlling for patient smoking and drinking (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.26-3.41). There was no statistically significant difference in risk of laryngeal malignancies between patients with GERD vs laryngopharyngeal reflux (P = .44).

CONCLUSIONS

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found a significant association between reflux disease and the presence of laryngeal malignancy. Prospective studies should be performed to examine this relationship.

Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

BACKGROUND

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is suspected when the symptoms are attributed to the penetration of acidic gastroesophageal reflux (GER) into the larynx. However, the relationships between the intensity of LPR and symptoms and laryngeal injury have not been elucidated. Several factors confound the study of LPR, namely pH is monitored in the pharynx (pharyngeal reflux) but the pharyngeal acidity (pH) required to induce laryngeal injury is unknown, the GER origin of pharyngeal acid is not always established, and a recent treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) confounds the analysis.

AIMS

We aimed to limit these confounding factors to analyze the relationship between LPR and symptoms and laryngeal injury.

METHODS

We used dual pharyngeal and distal esophageal 24-h pH/impedance monitoring to establish GER origin of pharyngeal reflux, we used an unbiased approach to analysis by evaluating a whole range of acidity (pH < 6, pH < 5.5, pH < 5.0, pH < 4.5 and pH < 4.0) in patients with suspected LPR without PPI for  > 30 days.

RESULTS

Pharyngeal reflux was (median[IQR]) 14[8-20.5] and 4[1.5-6.5] pharyngeal reflux episodes with pH < 6.0 and pH < 5.5, respectively. Pharyngeal reflux with pH < 5.0 was rare. Comprehensive analysis did not reveal any correlation between symptoms (reflux symptom index) or laryngeal injury (reflux finding score) and the number of pharyngeal reflux episodes or duration of pharyngeal acid exposure at any pH level.

CONCLUSION

Unbiased comprehensive approach did not reveal any relationship between acidic pharyngeal reflux and the symptoms or laryngeal injury attributed to LPR. Limited clinical usefulness of pharyngeal monitoring reported by others is unlikely due to confounding factors.

Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature about the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature on LPR epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment was conducted. Using the PRISMA statement, 3 authors selected relevant publications to provide a critical analysis of the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The important heterogeneity across studies in LPR diagnosis continues to make it difficult to summarize a single body of thought. Controversies persist concerning epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. No recent epidemiologic study exists regarding prevalence and incidence with the use of objective diagnostic tools. There is no survey that evaluates the prevalence of symptoms and signs on a large number of patients with confirmed LPR. Regarding diagnosis, an increasing number of authors used multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring, although there is no consensus regarding standardization of the diagnostic criteria. The efficiency of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy remains poorly demonstrated and misevaluated by incomplete clinical tools that do not take into consideration many symptoms and extralaryngeal findings. Despite the recent advances in knowledge about nonacid LPR, treatment protocols based on PPIs do not seem to have evolved.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The development of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and pepsin and bile salt detection should be considered for the establishment of a multiparameter diagnostic approach. LPR treatment should evolve to a more personalized regimen, including diet, PPIs, alginate, and magaldrate according to individual patient characteristics. Multicenter international studies with a standardized protocol could improve scientific knowledge about LPR.