1
|
Combined threats of climate change and land use to boreal protected areas with red-listed forest species in Finland. Glob Ecol Conserv 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
|
2
|
Harnesk D. The decreasing availability of reindeer forage in boreal forests during snow cover periods: A Sámi pastoral landscape perspective in Sweden. AMBIO 2022; 51:2508-2523. [PMID: 35727486 PMCID: PMC9583999 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-022-01752-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
This paper argues that Sámi reindeer pastoralism in Sweden is highly stressed during the critical snow cover periods due to large-scale human interventions, especially forestry, and that these have over time significantly worsened the ecological conditions for natural grazing-based responses to changing snow conditions caused by climate change. Informed by a literature review, the paper conceptualises two, overlapping ecological dynamics that shape the availability of lichen as key forage resources within a Sámi pastoral landscape perspective: the grazing dynamics of reindeer during snow cover periods as determined by climatic stochasticity, and the more predictable vegetation dynamics of lichen habitat formation, growth and sustenance based on structured forestry practices. This could help articulate an intervention ecology that pursues sustainable ecological conditions for natural grazing-based Sámi reindeer pastoralism, along with other goals. As such alternatives are likely to face political resistance, the article discusses the implications of its findings within a science-politics interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Harnesk
- Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS), PO Box 170, 22 100, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kyaschenko J, Strengbom J, Felton A, Aakala T, Staland H, Ranius T. Increase in dead wood, large living trees and tree diversity, yet decrease in understory vegetation cover: The effect of three decades of biodiversity-oriented forest policy in Swedish forests. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2022; 313:114993. [PMID: 35413650 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
In Sweden, the majority of forest area has been altered by industrial forestry over the decades. Almost 30 years ago, a shift towards biodiversity-oriented forest management practices occurred. Here we took advantage of long-term data collected by the Swedish National Forest Inventory to track developmental changes in forest structural components over this time. We assessed changes in structural components that play an important role in biodiversity (dead wood, large living trees, tree species composition, and understory vegetation) in four forest types with descending tiers of biodiversity protection: protected areas, woodland key habitats, low-productivity forests and production forests. Overall, we found a positive trend in the volumes of dead wood and large living trees, as well as in tree species diversity, while there was a general decline in understory vegetation coverage. Most observed changes were consistent with the intended outcomes of the current forest policy, adapted in the early 1990s. The implementation of retention forestry is likely driving some of the observed changes in forest structural components in the south. In contrast, we observed no changes in any of the focal structural components in the north, which could be attributed to the ongoing clear-cutting of forests previously managed less intensively. Dead wood and large living trees increased not only in managed, but also in unmanaged forests, likely reflecting historical management. The increased tree species diversity can be explained through current forest management practices that encourages maintenance of additional tree species. Decreasing understory vegetation coverage in both dense managed and unmanaged forests suggests that factors other than forestry contribute to the ongoing changes in understory vegetation in Swedish forests. Overall, the observed increase in structural components has not yet been reflected in documented improvements for red-listed forest species, which may be due to delays in species responses to small improvements, as well as a lack of detailed monitoring. Similarly, the increased availability of forest structural components might still be insufficient to meet the specific habitat requirements of red-listed species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Kyaschenko
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology, Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Joachim Strengbom
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology, Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Adam Felton
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Box 190, 234 22 Lomma, Alnarp, Sweden.
| | - Tuomas Aakala
- University of Eastern Finland, School of Forest Sciences, Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland.
| | | | - Thomas Ranius
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology, Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Esseen P, Ekström M, Grafström A, Jonsson BG, Palmqvist K, Westerlund B, Ståhl G. Multiple drivers of large-scale lichen decline in boreal forest canopies. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2022; 28:3293-3309. [PMID: 35156274 PMCID: PMC9310866 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Thin, hair-like lichens (Alectoria, Bryoria, Usnea) form conspicuous epiphyte communities across the boreal biome. These poikilohydric organisms provide important ecosystem functions and are useful indicators of global change. We analyse how environmental drivers influence changes in occurrence and length of these lichens on Norway spruce (Picea abies) over 10 years in managed forests in Sweden using data from >6000 trees. Alectoria and Usnea showed strong declines in southern-central regions, whereas Bryoria declined in northern regions. Overall, relative loss rates across the country ranged from 1.7% per year in Alectoria to 0.5% in Bryoria. These losses contrasted with increased length of Bryoria and Usnea in some regions. Occurrence trajectories (extinction, colonization, presence, absence) on remeasured trees correlated best with temperature, rain, nitrogen deposition, and stand age in multinomial logistic regression models. Our analysis strongly suggests that industrial forestry, in combination with nitrogen, is the main driver of lichen declines. Logging of forests with long continuity of tree cover, short rotation cycles, substrate limitation and low light in dense forests are harmful for lichens. Nitrogen deposition has decreased but is apparently still sufficiently high to prevent recovery. Warming correlated with occurrence trajectories of Alectoria and Bryoria, likely by altering hydration regimes and increasing respiration during autumn/winter. The large-scale lichen decline on an important host has cascading effects on biodiversity and function of boreal forest canopies. Forest management must apply a broad spectrum of methods, including uneven-aged continuous cover forestry and retention of large patches, to secure the ecosystem functions of these important canopy components under future climates. Our findings highlight interactions among drivers of lichen decline (forestry, nitrogen, climate), functional traits (dispersal, lichen colour, sensitivity to nitrogen, water storage), and population processes (extinction/colonization).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per‐Anders Esseen
- Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
| | - Magnus Ekström
- Department of Statistics, USBEUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
- Department of Forest Resource ManagementSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden
| | - Anton Grafström
- Department of Forest Resource ManagementSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden
| | - Bengt Gunnar Jonsson
- Department of Natural SciencesMid Sweden UniversitySundsvallSweden
- Department of Fish, Wildlife and Environmental SciencesSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden
| | - Kristin Palmqvist
- Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
| | - Bertil Westerlund
- Department of Forest Resource ManagementSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden
| | - Göran Ståhl
- Department of Forest Resource ManagementSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moor H, Eggers J, Fabritius H, Forsell N, Henckel L, Bradter U, Mazziotta A, Nordén J, Snäll T. Rebuilding green infrastructure in boreal production forest given future global wood demand. J Appl Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Moor
- SLU Swedish Species Information Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
- Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland
| | - Jeannette Eggers
- SLU Swedish Species Information Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
- Department of Forest Resource Management Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden
| | - Henna Fabritius
- SLU Swedish Species Information Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
- Smart City Centre of Excellence Tallinn University of Technology Tallinn Estonia
| | - Nicklas Forsell
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg Austria
| | - Laura Henckel
- SLU Swedish Species Information Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
- INRAE (French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment), UMR1347, Agroécologie, 21000 Dijon France
| | - Ute Bradter
- SLU Swedish Species Information Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway
| | - Adriano Mazziotta
- SLU Swedish Species Information Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) Bioeconomy and Environment, Latokartanonkaari 9 Helsinki Finland
| | - Jenni Nordén
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Oslo Norway
| | - Tord Snäll
- SLU Swedish Species Information Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Virkkala R, Leikola N, Kujala H, Kivinen S, Hurskainen P, Kuusela S, Valkama J, Heikkinen RK. Developing fine-grained nationwide predictions of valuable forests using biodiversity indicator bird species. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 32:e2505. [PMID: 34866270 PMCID: PMC9285730 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The use of indicator species in forest conservation and management planning can facilitate enhanced preservation of biodiversity from the negative effects of forestry and other uses of land. However, this requires detailed and spatially comprehensive knowledge of the habitat preferences and distributions of selected focal indicator species. Unfortunately, due to limited resources for field surveys, only a small proportion of the occurrences of focal species is usually known. This shortcoming can be circumvented by using modeling techniques to predict the spatial distribution of suitable sites for the target species. Airborne laser scanning (ALS) and other remote sensing (RS) techniques have the potential to provide useful environmental data covering systematically large areas for these purposes. Here, we focused on six bird of prey and woodpecker species known to be good indicators of boreal forest biodiversity values. We used known nest sites of the six indicator species based on nestling ringing records. Thus, the most suitable nesting sites of these species provide important information for biodiversity-friendly forest management and conservation planning. We developed fine-grained, that is, 96 × 96 m grid cell resolution, predictive maps across the whole of Finland of the suitable nesting habitats based on ALS and other RS data and spatial information on the distribution of important forest stands for the six studied biodiversity indicator bird species based on nesting-habitat suitability modeling, that is, the MaxEnt model. Habitat preferences of the study species, as determined by MaxEnt, were in line with the previous knowledge of species-habitat relations. The proportion of suitable habitats of these species in protected areas (PAs) was considerable, but our analysis also revealed many potentially high-quality forest stands outside PAs. However, many of these sites are increasingly threatened by logging because of increased pressures for using forests for bioeconomy and forest industry based on National Forest Strategy. Predicting habitat suitability based on information on the nest sites of indicator species provides a new tool for systematic conservation planning over large areas in boreal forests in Europe, and a corresponding approach would also be feasible and recommendable elsewhere where similar data are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raimo Virkkala
- Finnish Environment Institute, Biodiversity CentreHelsinkiFinland
| | - Niko Leikola
- Finnish Environment Institute, Biodiversity CentreHelsinkiFinland
| | - Heini Kujala
- Finnish Museum of Natural HistoryUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Sonja Kivinen
- Finnish Environment Institute, Biodiversity CentreHelsinkiFinland
- Department of Geographical and Historical StudiesUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland
| | - Pekka Hurskainen
- Finnish Environment Institute, Biodiversity CentreHelsinkiFinland
| | - Saija Kuusela
- Finnish Environment Institute, Biodiversity CentreHelsinkiFinland
| | - Jari Valkama
- Finnish Museum of Natural HistoryUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Angelstam P, Albulescu AC, Andrianambinina ODF, Aszalós R, Borovichev E, Cardona WC, Dobrynin D, Fedoriak M, Firm D, Hunter ML, de Jong W, Lindenmayer D, Manton M, Monge JJ, Mezei P, Michailova G, Brenes CLM, Pastur GM, Petrova OV, Petrov V, Pokorny B, Rafanoharana SC, Rosas YM, Seymour BR, Waeber PO, Wilmé L, Yamelynets T, Zlatanov T. Frontiers of protected areas versus forest exploitation: Assessing habitat network functionality in 16 case study regions globally. AMBIO 2021; 50:2286-2310. [PMID: 34657275 PMCID: PMC8563882 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01628-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Exploitation of natural forests forms expanding frontiers. Simultaneously, protected area frontiers aim at maintaining functional habitat networks. To assess net effects of these frontiers, we examined 16 case study areas on five continents. We (1) mapped protected area instruments, (2) assessed their effectiveness, (3) mapped policy implementation tools, and (4) effects on protected areas originating from their surroundings. Results are given as follows: (1) conservation instruments covered 3-77%, (2) effectiveness of habitat networks depended on representativeness, habitat quality, functional connectivity, resource extraction in protected areas, time for landscape restoration, "paper parks", "fortress conservation", and data access, (3) regulatory policy instruments dominated over economic and informational, (4) negative matrix effects dominated over positive ones (protective forests, buffer zones, inaccessibility), which were restricted to former USSR and Costa Rica. Despite evidence-based knowledge about conservation targets, the importance of spatial segregation of conservation and use, and traditional knowledge, the trajectories for biodiversity conservation were generally negative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Angelstam
- School for Forest Management, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 43, 73921 Skinnskatteberg, Sweden
- Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Campus Evenstad, 2480 Koppang, Norway
| | - Andra-Cosmina Albulescu
- Department of Geography, Faculty of Geography and Geology, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi, Carol I Boulevard No. 11, 700506 Iasi, Romania
| | | | - Réka Aszalós
- Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Alkotmány u. 2-4, Vácrátót, 2163 Hungary
| | - Eugene Borovichev
- Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of the Kola Science Center of RAS, Akademgorodok Street 14a, Apatity, Murmansk, Russia
| | - Walter Cano Cardona
- International Union for Conservation of Nature-Project Integration of Protected Areas from Amazon Biome, República del Salvador Av. N 34-127 and Suiza, PO Box 170515, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Denis Dobrynin
- Department of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland
| | - Mariia Fedoriak
- Department of Ecology and Biomonitoring, Institute of Biology, Chemistry and Bioresources, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, 2 Kotsyubynskyi Street, Chernivtsi, 58012 Ukraine
| | - Dejan Firm
- New Zealand Forest Research Institute-Scion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3010 New Zealand
| | - Malcolm L. Hunter
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Room 226, Orono, ME 04469-5775 USA
| | - Wil de Jong
- Kyoto University, 46 Shimoadachichou, Sakyoku, Kyoto, 606‐8501 Japan
| | - David Lindenmayer
- Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia
| | - Michael Manton
- Faculty of Forest Science and Ecology, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentu˛ g. 13, Akademija, Kauno r., 53362 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Juan J. Monge
- Market Economics Ltd, Digital Basecamp, 1132 Hinemoa Street, Rotorua, 3010 New Zealand
| | - Pavel Mezei
- Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľ. Štúra 2, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia
- Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia
| | - Galina Michailova
- N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Science (FCIArctic RAS), 23 Northern Dvina Embankment, Arkhangel’sk, Russia 163000
| | - Carlos L. Muñoz Brenes
- Social Science, Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
| | - Guillermo Martínez Pastur
- Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Houssay, 200 (9410) Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego Argentina
| | - Olga V. Petrova
- Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of the Kola Science Center of RAS, Akademgorodok Street 14a, Apatity, Murmansk, Russia
| | - Victor Petrov
- Kola Biodiversity Conservation Center, Lenina st. 6-29, Apatity, Murmansk, Russia 184209
| | - Benny Pokorny
- Waldbau-Institut, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacherstr. 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Serge C. Rafanoharana
- World Resources Institute Africa, Madagascar Program, Hôtel Colbert, Business Center Area, 29 Lalana Printsy Ratsimamanga, BP 3884, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | - Yamina Micaela Rosas
- Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Houssay, 200 (9410) Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego Argentina
| | - Bob Robert Seymour
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Room 226, Orono, ME 04469-5775 USA
| | - Patrick O. Waeber
- Forest Management and Development, Department of Environmental Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Universitätsstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lucienne Wilmé
- World Resources Institute Africa, Madagascar Program, Hôtel Colbert, Business Center Area, 29 Lalana Printsy Ratsimamanga, BP 3884, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar
- Missouri Botanical Garden, Madagascar Research & Conservation Program, BP 3391, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | - Taras Yamelynets
- Faculty of Geography, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Doroshenko Street 41, L’viv, 79000 Ukraine
| | - Tzvetan Zlatanov
- Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 Gagarin Street, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Effects of Forestry Intensification and Conservation on Green Infrastructures: A Spatio-Temporal Evaluation in Sweden. LAND 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/land10050531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
There is a rivalry between policies on intensification of forest management to meet the demands of a growing bioeconomy, and policies on green infrastructure functionality. Evaluation of the net effects of different policy instruments on real-world outcomes is crucial. First, we present data on final felling rates in wood production landscapes and stand age distribution dynamic in two case study regions, and changes in dead wood amounts in Sweden. Second, the growth of formally protected areas was compiled and changes in functional connectivity analysed in these regions, and the development of dead wood and green tree retention in Sweden was described. The case studies were the counties Dalarna and Jämtland (77,000 km2) representing an expanding frontier of boreal forest transformation. In the wood production landscape, official final felling rates averaged 0.84%/year, extending the regional timber frontier. The amount of forest <60 years old increased from 27–34% in 1955 to 60–65% in 2017. The amounts of dead wood, a key forest naturalness indicator, declined from 1994 to 2016 in north Sweden, and increased in the south, albeit both at levels far below evidence-based biodiversity targets. Formal forest protection grew rapidly in the two counties from 1968 to 2020 but reached only 4% of productive forests. From 2000 to 2019, habitat network functionality for old Scots pine declined by 15–41%, and Norway spruce by 15–88%. There were mixed trends for dead wood and tree retention at the stand scale. The net result of the continued transformation of near-natural forest remnants and conservation efforts was negative at the regional and landscape levels, but partly positive at the stand scale. However, at all three scales, habitat amounts were far below critical thresholds for the maintenance of viable populations of species, let alone ecological integrity. Collaboration among stakeholder categories should reject opinionated narratives, and instead rely on evidence-based knowledge about green infrastructure pressures, responses, and states.
Collapse
|
9
|
Martin M, Tremblay JA, Ibarzabal J, Morin H. An indicator species highlights continuous deadwood supply is a key ecological attribute of boreal old‐growth forests. Ecosphere 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Maxence Martin
- Département des Sciences Fondamentales Université du Québec à Chicoutimi 555 Boulevard de l'Université Chicoutimi QuebecG7H 2B1Canada
- Centre d'Étude de la Forêt Université du Québec à Montréal P.O. Box 8888, Centre‐ville Station Montreal QuebecH3C 3P8Canada
| | - Junior A. Tremblay
- Département des Sciences Fondamentales Université du Québec à Chicoutimi 555 Boulevard de l'Université Chicoutimi QuebecG7H 2B1Canada
- Centre d'Étude de la Forêt Université du Québec à Montréal P.O. Box 8888, Centre‐ville Station Montreal QuebecH3C 3P8Canada
- Wildlife Research Division Environment and Climate Change Canada 801‐1550 Avenue d'Estimauville Quebec QuebecG1J0C3Canada
| | - Jacques Ibarzabal
- Département des Sciences Fondamentales Université du Québec à Chicoutimi 555 Boulevard de l'Université Chicoutimi QuebecG7H 2B1Canada
- Centre d'Étude de la Forêt Université du Québec à Montréal P.O. Box 8888, Centre‐ville Station Montreal QuebecH3C 3P8Canada
| | - Hubert Morin
- Département des Sciences Fondamentales Université du Québec à Chicoutimi 555 Boulevard de l'Université Chicoutimi QuebecG7H 2B1Canada
- Centre d'Étude de la Forêt Université du Québec à Montréal P.O. Box 8888, Centre‐ville Station Montreal QuebecH3C 3P8Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Berglund H, Kuuluvainen T. Representative boreal forest habitats in northern Europe, and a revised model for ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation. AMBIO 2021; 50:1003-1017. [PMID: 33454914 PMCID: PMC8035375 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01444-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The natural range of variation of ecosystems provides reference conditions for sustainable management and biodiversity conservation. We review how the understanding of natural reference conditions of boreal forests in northern Europe has changed from earlier perceptions of even-aged dynamics driven by stand-replacing disturbances towards current understanding highlighting the role of non-stand-replacing disturbances and the resultant complex forest dynamics and structures. We show how earlier views and conceptual models of forest disturbance dynamics, including the influential ASIO model, provide estimates of reference conditions that are outside the natural range of variation. Based on a research synthesis, we present a revised forest reference model incorporating the observed complexity of ecosystem dynamics and the prevalence of old forests. Finally, we outline a management model and demonstrate its use in forest ecosystem management and show how regional conservation area needs can be estimated. We conclude that attaining favourable conservation status in northern Europe's boreal forests requires increasing emphasis on ecosystem management and conservation for old forest characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Håkan Berglund
- Swedish Species Information Center, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7007, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Timo Kuuluvainen
- Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mikusiński G, Orlikowska EH, Bubnicki JW, Jonsson BG, Svensson J. Strengthening the Network of High Conservation Value Forests in Boreal Landscapes. Front Ecol Evol 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.595730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The natural and old-growth forests and their associated biodiversity continues to fade worldwide due to anthropogenic impact in various forms. The boreal forests in Fennoscandia have been subject to intensive clearfelling forestry since the middle of twentieth century. As a result, only a fraction of forests with long temporal continuity remains at the landscape level. In Sweden, some of these primary forests have been formally protected, whereas other forests with known high conservation values are not. Collectively, both protected and not protected known valuable primary forests are included in a nationally delineated network of high conservation value forests (HCVF). In addition to HCVF, older forests that have not been clearfelled since the mid-1900s, i.e., “proxy continuity forests,” have recently been mapped across the entire boreal biome in Sweden. In this paper, we analyze how these proxy continuity forests may strengthen the HCVF network from a green infrastructure perspective. First, we evaluate the spatial overlap between proxy continuity forests and HCVF. Second, we perform a large-scale connectivity analysis, in which we show that adding proxy continuity forests located outside HCVF strongly increases the structural connectivity of the network of protected forests. Finally, by assessing habitat suitability for virtual species specialized in pine, spruce, and broadleaf forests, we find large regional differences in the ability to secure habitat and thereby functional green infrastructure by considering currently unprotected primary forest. We show that, by adding those forests to the network, the area of habitat for low-demanding species dependent on spruce or pine forests can be largely increased. For high-demanding species, additional habitat restoration in the landscape matrix is needed. By contrast, even counting all valuable broadleaf forests available is not enough to provide a suitable habitat for their associated species, which indicates a large need for landscape-scale habitat restoration initiatives, in particular, for broadleaf forests.
Collapse
|
12
|
Honeck E, Sanguet A, Schlaepfer MA, Wyler N, Lehmann A. Methods for identifying green infrastructure. SN APPLIED SCIENCES 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-03575-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractNature forms interdependent networks in a landscape, which is key to the survival of species and the maintenance of genetic diversity. Nature provides crucial socio-economic benefits to people, but they are typically undervalued in political decisions. This has led to the concept of Green Infrastructure (GI), which defines an interlinked network of (semi-)natural areas with high ecological values for wildlife and people, to be conserved and managed in priority to preserve biodiversity and ecosystem services. This relatively new concept has been used in different contexts, but with widely diverging interpretations. There is no apparent consensus in the scientific literature on the methodology to map and implement GI. This paper serves as an informed primer for researchers that are new to GI mapping understand the key principles and terminology for the needs of their own case-study, and as a framework for more advance researchers willing to contribute to the formalization of the concept. Through a literature review of articles on creating GI networks, we summarized and evaluated commonly used methods to identify and map GI. We provided key insights for the assessment of diversity, ecosystem services and landscape connectivity, the three ‘pillars’ on which GI identification is based according to its definition. Based on this literature review, we propose 5 theoretical levels toward a more complex, reliable and integrative approach to identify GI networks. We then discuss the applications and limits of such method and point out future challenges for GI identification and implementation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sabatini FM, Keeton WS, Lindner M, Svoboda M, Verkerk PJ, Bauhus J, Bruelheide H, Burrascano S, Debaive N, Duarte I, Garbarino M, Grigoriadis N, Lombardi F, Mikoláš M, Meyer P, Motta R, Mozgeris G, Nunes L, Ódor P, Panayotov M, Ruete A, Simovski B, Stillhard J, Svensson J, Szwagrzyk J, Tikkanen O, Vandekerkhove K, Volosyanchuk R, Vrska T, Zlatanov T, Kuemmerle T. Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe. DIVERS DISTRIB 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco M. Sabatini
- Institut für Biologie Martin‐Luther‐Universität Halle‐Wittenberg Halle Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Germany
- Geography Department Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - William S. Keeton
- Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont Burlington VT USA
| | - Marcus Lindner
- Resilience Programme European Forest Institute Bonn Germany
| | - Miroslav Svoboda
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha 6 – Suchdol Czech Republic
| | | | - Jürgen Bauhus
- Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
| | - Helge Bruelheide
- Institut für Biologie Martin‐Luther‐Universität Halle‐Wittenberg Halle Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Germany
| | - Sabina Burrascano
- Department of Environmental Biology Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
| | | | - Inês Duarte
- Centre for Applied Ecology “Professor Baeta Neves” (CEABN) InBIO School of Agriculture University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal
| | - Matteo Garbarino
- Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA) University of Torino Grugliasco Italy
| | | | - Fabio Lombardi
- Department of Agraria Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria – Feo Di Vito Reggio Calabria Italy
| | - Martin Mikoláš
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha 6 – Suchdol Czech Republic
- PRALES Rosina Slovakia
| | - Peter Meyer
- Northwest German Forest Research Institute Göttingen Germany
| | - Renzo Motta
- Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA) University of Torino Grugliasco Italy
| | - Gintautas Mozgeris
- Agriculture Academy Institute of Forest Management and Wood Science Vytautas Magnus University Akademija Lithuania
| | - Leónia Nunes
- Centre for Applied Ecology “Professor Baeta Neves” (CEABN) InBIO School of Agriculture University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal
- CITAB Centre of the Research and Technology of Agro‐Environmental and Biological Science University of Trás‐os‐Montes and Alto Douro Vila Real Portugal
| | - Péter Ódor
- Centre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary
| | | | | | - Bojan Simovski
- Hans Em Faculty of Forest Sciences Landscape Architecture and Environmental Engineering Department of Botany and Dendrology Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje Skopje North Macedonia
| | - Jonas Stillhard
- Forest Resources and Management Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland
| | - Johan Svensson
- Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden
| | - Jerzy Szwagrzyk
- Department of Forest Biodiversity University of Agriculture in Krakow Krakow Poland
| | | | | | | | - Tomas Vrska
- Silva Tarouca Research Institute Brno Czech Republic
| | - Tzvetan Zlatanov
- Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria
| | - Tobias Kuemmerle
- Geography Department Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
- Integrative Research Institute on Transformation in Human‐Environment Systems Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Landscape Approaches to Sustainability—Aspects of Conflict, Integration, and Synergy in National Public Land-Use Interests. SUSTAINABILITY 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/su12125113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Strong land-use pressure challenges sustainable development and calls for landscape approaches that balance economic, ecological, and socio-cultural aspects and interests. In the boreal, sub-alpine, and alpine regions in Sweden, encompassing 32 million ha, many and different land-use interests overlap, which causes risks for conflict, but potentially also suggests integration and synergy opportunities. Based on geographic information system (GIS) analyses of geographically delineated national interests regulated in the Swedish Environmental Code, including, amongst others, Natura 2000, contiguous mountains, recreation, reindeer husbandry, and wind power, and based on forestry as a dominating land use, we found extensive overlap among similar but also between dissimilar types of interest. In some mountain municipalities, our results show that the designated national interest area is four times as large as the available terrestrial area. Moreover, the overlap is much higher in the alpine than in the boreal biome, and there is increasing designation for nature conservation and a decreasing designation for national interests for culture, recreation, and tourism from south to north. We interpret the results with reference to multiple-use needs and opportunities for landscape approaches to sustainable planning. Departing from biodiversity conservation values, we also discuss opportunities to focus planning strategies on assessing synergy, integration, and conflict based on nature-based and place-based land-use characteristics.
Collapse
|
15
|
Geneletti D, Adem Esmail B, Cortinovis C, Arany I, Balzan M, van Beukering P, Bicking S, Borges P, Borisova B, Broekx S, Burkhard B, Gil A, Inghe O, Kopperoinen L, Kruse M, Liekens I, Lowicki D, Mizgajski A, Mulder S, Nedkov S, Ostergard H, Picanço A, Ruskule A, Santos-Martín F, Sieber IM, Svensson J, Vačkářů D, Veidemane K. Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies. ONE ECOSYSTEM 2020. [DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
This paper analyses and compares a set of case studies on ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment with the purpose of formulating lessons learned and recommendations. Fourteen case studies were selected during the EU Horizon 2020 “Coordination and Support Action” ESMERALDA to represent different policy- and decision-making processes throughout the European Union, across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales. The analysis is based on a framework that addresses the key steps of an ES mapping and assessment process, namely policy questions, stakeholder identification and involvement, application of mapping and assessment methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The analysis revealed that most case studies were policy-orientated or gave explicit suggestions for policy implementation in different contexts, including urban, rural and natural areas. Amongst the findings, the importance of starting stakeholder engagement early in the process was confirmed in order to generate interest and confidence in the project and to increase their willingness to cooperate. Concerning mapping and assessment methods, it was found that the integration of methods and results is essential for providing a comprehensive overview from different perspectives (e.g. social, economic). Finally, lessons learned for effective implementation of ES mapping and assessment results are presented and discussed.
Graphical Abstarcat in Fig. 1.
Collapse
|
16
|
Orlikowska EH, Svensson J, Roberge JM, Blicharska M, Mikusiński G. Hit or miss? Evaluating the effectiveness of Natura 2000 for conservation of forest bird habitat in Sweden. Glob Ecol Conserv 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
17
|
Felton A, Löfroth T, Angelstam P, Gustafsson L, Hjältén J, Felton AM, Simonsson P, Dahlberg A, Lindbladh M, Svensson J, Nilsson U, Lodin I, Hedwall PO, Sténs A, Lämås T, Brunet J, Kalén C, Kriström B, Gemmel P, Ranius T. Keeping pace with forestry: Multi-scale conservation in a changing production forest matrix. AMBIO 2020; 49:1050-1064. [PMID: 31529355 PMCID: PMC7067752 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01248-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The multi-scale approach to conserving forest biodiversity has been used in Sweden since the 1980s, a period defined by increased reserve area and conservation actions within production forests. However, two thousand forest-associated species remain on Sweden's red-list, and Sweden's 2020 goals for sustainable forests are not being met. We argue that ongoing changes in the production forest matrix require more consideration, and that multi-scale conservation must be adapted to, and integrated with, production forest development. To make this case, we summarize trends in habitat provision by Sweden's protected and production forests, and the variety of ways silviculture can affect biodiversity. We discuss how different forestry trajectories affect the type and extent of conservation approaches needed to secure biodiversity, and suggest leverage points for aiding the adoption of diversified silviculture. Sweden's long-term experience with multi-scale conservation and intensive forestry provides insights for other countries trying to conserve species within production landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Felton
- Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, Box 49, Rörsjöv 1, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Therese Löfroth
- Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, Box 49, Rörsjöv 1, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Per Angelstam
- Faculty of Forest Sciences, School for Forest Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 43, 730 91 Skinnskatteberg, Sweden
| | - Lena Gustafsson
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Joakim Hjältén
- Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Annika M. Felton
- Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, Box 49, Rörsjöv 1, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
| | | | - Anders Dahlberg
- Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7026, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Matts Lindbladh
- Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, Box 49, Rörsjöv 1, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Johan Svensson
- Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Urban Nilsson
- Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, Box 49, Rörsjöv 1, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Isak Lodin
- Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, Box 49, Rörsjöv 1, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
| | - P. O. Hedwall
- Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, Box 49, Rörsjöv 1, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Anna Sténs
- Department of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Tomas Lämås
- Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jörg Brunet
- Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, Box 49, Rörsjöv 1, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Christer Kalén
- National Forest Agency, Bryggargatan 19-21, 503 38 Borås, Sweden
| | - Bengt Kriström
- Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 90183 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Pelle Gemmel
- Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, Box 49, Rörsjöv 1, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Thomas Ranius
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jönsson M, Snäll T. Ecosystem service multifunctionality of low‐productivity forests and implications for conservation and management. J Appl Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Jönsson
- The Swedish Species Information Centre The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| | - Tord Snäll
- The Swedish Species Information Centre The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chiarucci A, Piovesan G. Need for a global map of forest naturalness for a sustainable future. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2020; 34:368-372. [PMID: 31418913 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 06/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
There is a growing need to assess and monitor forest cover and its conservation status over global scales to determine human impact on ecosystems and to develop sustainability plans. Recent approaches to measure regional and global forest status and dynamics are based on remotely sensed estimates of tree cover. We argue that tree cover should not be used to assess the area of forest ecosystems because tree cover is an undefined subset of forest cover. For example, tree cover can indicate a positive trend even in the presence of deforestation, as in the case of plantations. We believe a global map of forest naturalness that accounts for the bio-ecological integrity of forest ecosystems, for example, intact forests, old-growth forest patches, rewilding forests (exploited forest landscapes undergoing long-term natural succession), and managed forests is needed for global forest assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Chiarucci
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences (BIGEA), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluca Piovesan
- Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
European Union’s Last Intact Forest Landscapes are at A Value Chain Crossroad between Multiple Use and Intensified Wood Production. FORESTS 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/f10070564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Research Highlights: The European Union’s last large intact forest landscapes along the Scandinavian Mountain range in Sweden offer unique opportunities for conservation of biodiversity, ecological integrity and resilience. However, these forests are at a crossroad between intensified wood production aimed at bio-economy, and rural development based on multi-functional forest landscapes for future-oriented forest value chains. Background and Objectives: We (1) estimate the area of near-natural forests potentially remaining for forest harvesting and wood production, or as green infrastructure for biodiversity conservation and human well-being in rural areas, (2) review how forest and conservation policies have so far succeeded to reduce the loss of mountain forests, and (3) discuss what economic, socio-cultural and ecological values that are at stake, as well as different governance and management solutions. Materials and Methods: First, we estimated the remaining amount of intact mountain forests using (1) the Swedish National Forest Inventory, (2) protected area statistics, (3) forest harvest permit applications and actually harvested forests, (4) remote sensing wall-to-wall data on forests not subject to clear-felling since the mid-1950s, (5) mapping of productive and non-productive forestland, and (6) estimates of mean annual final felling rate. Second, we review policy documents related to the emergence of land use regulation in north Sweden, including the mountain forest border, and illustrate this with an actual case that has had significant policy implementation importance. Results: There is a clear difference between the proportions of formally protected productive forestland above the mountain forest border (52.5%) and north Sweden in general (6.3%). A total of 300,000 ha of previously not clear-felled mountain forest outside protected areas remain, which can support novel value chains that are not achievable elsewhere. Conclusions: The mountain forests in Sweden provide unique conservation values in the European Union. Since the beginning of the 1990s, policy regulations have been successful in limiting forest harvesting. Currently, however, mountain forests are a battle ground regarding intensification of forest use, including logging of forests that have never been subject to clear-felling systems vs. nature conservation and wilderness as a base for rural development. The ability of mountain municipalities to encourage sustainable rural forest landscapes must be strengthened.
Collapse
|
21
|
Basile M, Mikusiński G, Storch I. Bird guilds show different responses to tree retention levels: a meta-analysis. Glob Ecol Conserv 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|