1
|
Prado T, Degrave WMS, Duarte GF. Lichens and Health-Trends and Perspectives for the Study of Biodiversity in the Antarctic Ecosystem. J Fungi (Basel) 2025; 11:198. [PMID: 40137236 PMCID: PMC11942898 DOI: 10.3390/jof11030198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Lichens are an important vegetative component of the Antarctic terrestrial ecosystem and present a wide diversity. Recent advances in omics technologies have allowed for the identification of lichen microbiomes and the complex symbiotic relationships that contribute to their survival mechanisms under extreme conditions. The preservation of biodiversity and genetic resources is fundamental for the balance of ecosystems and for human and animal health. In order to assess the current knowledge on Antarctic lichens, we carried out a systematic review of the international applied research published between January 2019 and February 2024, using the PRISMA model (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Articles that included the descriptors "lichen" and "Antarctic" were gathered from the web, and a total of 110 and 614 publications were retrieved from PubMed and ScienceDirect, respectively. From those, 109 publications were selected and grouped according to their main research characteristics, namely, (i) biodiversity, ecology and conservation; (ii) biomonitoring and environmental health; (iii) biotechnology and metabolism; (iv) climate change; (v) evolution and taxonomy; (vi) reviews; and (vii) symbiosis. Several topics were related to the discovery of secondary metabolites with potential for treating neurodegenerative, cancer and metabolic diseases, besides compounds with antimicrobial activity. Survival mechanisms under extreme environmental conditions were also addressed in many studies, as well as research that explored the lichen-associated microbiome, its biodiversity, and its use in biomonitoring and climate change, and reviews. The main findings of these studies are discussed, as well as common themes and perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana Prado
- Laboratory of Applied Genomics and Bioinnovation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Av. Brasil, 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil; (W.M.S.D.); (G.F.D.)
| | - Wim Maurits Sylvain Degrave
- Laboratory of Applied Genomics and Bioinnovation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Av. Brasil, 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil; (W.M.S.D.); (G.F.D.)
| | - Gabriela Frois Duarte
- Laboratory of Applied Genomics and Bioinnovation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Av. Brasil, 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil; (W.M.S.D.); (G.F.D.)
- Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Av. Pedro Calmon, 550, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, RJ, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pertierra LR, Convey P, Barbosa A, Biersma EM, Cowan D, Diniz-Filho JAF, de Los Ríos A, Escribano-Álvarez P, Fraser CI, Fontaneto D, Greve M, Griffiths HJ, Harris M, Hughes KA, Lynch HJ, Ladle RJ, Liu XP, le Roux PC, Majewska R, Molina-Montenegro MA, Peck LS, Quesada A, Ronquillo C, Ropert-Coudert Y, Sancho LG, Terauds A, Varliero G, Vianna JA, Wilmotte A, Chown SL, Olalla-Tárraga MÁ, Hortal J. Advances and shortfalls in knowledge of Antarctic terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity. Science 2025; 387:609-615. [PMID: 39913585 DOI: 10.1126/science.adk2118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2025] [Indexed: 04/23/2025]
Abstract
Antarctica harbors many distinctive features of life, yet much about the diversity and functioning of Antarctica's life remains unknown. Evolutionary histories and functional ecology are well understood only for vertebrates, whereas research on invertebrates is largely limited to species descriptions and some studies on environmental tolerances. Knowledge on Antarctic vegetation cover showcases the challenges of characterizing population trends for most groups. Recent community-level microbial studies have provided insights into the functioning of life at its limits. Overall, biotic interactions remain largely unknown across all groups, restricted to basic information on trophic level placement. Insufficient knowledge of many groups limits the understanding of ecological processes on the continent. Remedies for the current situation rely on identifying the caveats of each ecological discipline and finding targeted solutions. Such precise delimitation of knowledge gaps will enable a more aware, representative, and strategic systematic conservation planning of Antarctica.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L R Pertierra
- Departamento de Biología, Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Mostoles, Spain
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Millennium Institute of Biodiversity of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic Ecosystems (BASE), Santiago, Chile
- Department of Biogeography and Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | - P Convey
- Millennium Institute of Biodiversity of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic Ecosystems (BASE), Santiago, Chile
- British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - A Barbosa
- Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MNCN-CSIC, Madrid, Spain
| | - E M Biersma
- Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D Cowan
- Centre for Microbial Ecology and Genomics, Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - J A F Diniz-Filho
- Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
- National Institute for Science and Technology in Ecology, Evolution, and Biodiversity Conservation (INCT EECBio), Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
| | - A de Los Ríos
- Departamento de Biogeoquimica y Ecologia Microbiana, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MNCN-CSIC, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Escribano-Álvarez
- Departamento de Biología, Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Mostoles, Spain
| | - C I Fraser
- Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - D Fontaneto
- Natural Research Council, Water Research Institute (CNR-IRSA), Verbania, Italy
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo, Italy
| | - M Greve
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | - M Harris
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | - H J Lynch
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - R J Ladle
- National Institute for Science and Technology in Ecology, Evolution, and Biodiversity Conservation (INCT EECBio), Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
- Institute of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil
| | - X P Liu
- Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - P C le Roux
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - R Majewska
- Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
- Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| | | | - L S Peck
- British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Quesada
- Departamento de Biologia, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, Spain
| | - C Ronquillo
- Department of Biogeography and Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Y Ropert-Coudert
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, La Rochelle Université, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - L G Sancho
- Departamento de Biologia Vegetal II, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Terauds
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Kingston, TAS, Australia
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - G Varliero
- Centre for Microbial Ecology and Genomics, Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Rhizosphere Processes Group, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | - J A Vianna
- Millennium Institute of Biodiversity of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic Ecosystems (BASE), Santiago, Chile
- Faculty of Biological Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Santiago, Chile
| | - A Wilmotte
- Bios Research Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - S L Chown
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - M Á Olalla-Tárraga
- Departamento de Biología, Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Mostoles, Spain
| | - J Hortal
- Department of Biogeography and Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Spain
- National Institute for Science and Technology in Ecology, Evolution, and Biodiversity Conservation (INCT EECBio), Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gardiner NB, Gilbert N, Liggett D, Bode M. Measuring the performance of Antarctic Treaty decision-making. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2025; 39:e14349. [PMID: 39162249 PMCID: PMC11780206 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Agreements reached at the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCMs) are among the primary means for addressing Antarctic conservation and environmental protection issues. However, according to contemporary scholars, Antarctic Treaty decision-making is becoming increasingly unresponsive to the rising environmental challenges in the region. We assessed the performance of Antarctic Treaty decision-making by measuring the rate and diversity of decision-making over the last 6 decades. To measure the rate, we counted the number of inputs and outputs of ATCMs and calculated the time taken for legally binding outputs to enter into force. To measure diversity, we calculated the range of topics addressed by the inputs and outputs of ATCMs. The average number of agreements reached per ATCM increased from 1961 to 2022. Although the diversity of Antarctic topics discussed at ATCMs remained consistently high, the diversity of topics on which legally binding agreements were adopted declined significantly. Antarctic issues-including those of highest priority-are now almost entirely dealt with through nonbinding, soft-law agreements. It is plausible that this move away from binding decisions reflects a dynamic governance institution evolving to respond to new pressures. However, we suggest that the change reveals a concerning shift in decision-making behavior and performance, unique to the treaty's history. Soft law is beneficial in some cases, but its overuse diminishes accountability and transparency, significantly reducing the parties' abilities to understand and measure their performance, including the outcomes and impacts of decisions. Although the rate and diversity of ATCM inputs and outputs provide only a partial view of decision-making performance, the exploration of these metrics provides a foundation for asking essential questions about the impacts of Antarctic Treaty governance on the region's environmental protection and conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Blaize Gardiner
- Gateway Antarctica, Centre for Antarctic Studies and Research, School of Earth & EnvironmentUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
- Antarctica New ZealandChristchurchNew Zealand
| | - Neil Gilbert
- Gateway Antarctica, Centre for Antarctic Studies and Research, School of Earth & EnvironmentUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
- Antarctica New ZealandChristchurchNew Zealand
| | - Daniela Liggett
- Gateway Antarctica, Centre for Antarctic Studies and Research, School of Earth & EnvironmentUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
| | - Michael Bode
- School of Mathematical SciencesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental FutureQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tóth AB, Terauds A, Chown SL, Hughes KA, Convey P, Hodgson DA, Cowan DA, Gibson J, Leihy RI, Murray NJ, Robinson SA, Shaw JD, Stark JS, Stevens MI, van den Hoff J, Wasley J, Keith DA. A dataset of Antarctic ecosystems in ice-free lands: classification, descriptions, and maps. Sci Data 2025; 12:133. [PMID: 39843903 PMCID: PMC11754900 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04424-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 01/24/2025] Open
Abstract
Antarctica, Earth's least understood and most remote continent, is threatened by human disturbances and climate-related changes, underscoring the imperative for biodiversity inventories to inform conservation. Antarctic ecosystems support unique species and genetic diversity, deliver essential ecosystem services and contribute to planetary stability. We present Antarctica's first comprehensive ecosystem classification and map of ice-free lands, which host most of the continent's biodiversity. We used latent variables in factor analyses to partition continental-scale abiotic variation, then biotic variation represented in spatial models, and finally recognised regional-scale variation among biogeographic units. This produced a spatially explicit hierarchical classification with nine Major Environment Units (Tier 1), 33 Habitat Complexes (Tier 2) and 269 Bioregional Ecosystem Types (Tier 3) mapped at 100 m resolution and aligned with 'level 4' of the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology. This comprehensive ecosystem inventory provides foundational data to inform protected area designation under the Antarctic Treaty's Environmental Protocol and track risks to Antarctic ecosystems. Its tiered structure and workflow accommodate data scarcity and facilitate updates, promoting robustness as knowledge builds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anikó B Tóth
- Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
- UNSW Data Science Hub, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Aleks Terauds
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania, 7050, Australia
| | - Steven L Chown
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, 3800, Australia
| | - Kevin A Hughes
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK
| | - Peter Convey
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK
- Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa
- Millennium Institute Biodiversity of Antarctic and Subantarctic Ecosystems (BASE), Santiago, Chile
| | - Dominic A Hodgson
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK
| | - Don A Cowan
- Centre for Microbial Ecology and Genomics, Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
| | - John Gibson
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania, 7050, Australia
| | - Rachel I Leihy
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, 3800, Australia
| | - Nicholas J Murray
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, 4811, Australia
| | - Sharon A Robinson
- Environmental Futures, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
| | - Justine D Shaw
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, 4001, Australia
| | - Jonathan S Stark
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania, 7050, Australia
| | - Mark I Stevens
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, Earth and Biological Sciences, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
| | - John van den Hoff
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania, 7050, Australia
| | - Jane Wasley
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania, 7050, Australia
| | - David A Keith
- Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee JR, Shaw JD, Ropert-Coudert Y, Terauds A, Chown SL. Conservation features of the terrestrial Antarctic Peninsula. AMBIO 2024; 53:1037-1049. [PMID: 38589654 PMCID: PMC11101391 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-024-02009-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Conserving landscapes used by multiple stakeholder groups requires understanding of what each stakeholder values. Here we employed a semi-structured, participatory approach to identify features of value in the terrestrial Antarctic Peninsula related to biodiversity, science and tourism. Stakeholders identified 115 features, ranging from Adélie penguin colonies to sites suitable for snowshoeing tourists. We split the features into seven broad categories: science, tourism, historic, biodiversity, geographic, habitat, and intrinsic features, finding that the biodiversity category contained the most features of any one category, while science stakeholders identified the most features of any stakeholder group. Stakeholders have overlapping interests in some features, particularly for seals and seabirds, indicating that thoughtful consideration of their inclusion in future management is required. Acknowledging the importance of tourism and other social features in Antarctica and ensuring their integration into conservation planning and assessment will increase the likelihood of implementing successful environmental management strategies into the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine R Lee
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
- British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
| | - Justine D Shaw
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia
| | - Yan Ropert-Coudert
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372, La Rochelle Université - CNRS, 79360, Villiers en Bois, France
| | - Aleks Terauds
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia
- Integrated Digital East Antarctic Program, Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, the Environment, Energy and Water, Kingston, TAS, 7050, Australia
| | - Steven L Chown
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giovannini I, Manfrin C, Greco S, Vincenzi J, Altiero T, Guidetti R, Giulianini P, Rebecchi L. Increasing temperature-driven changes in life history traits and gene expression of an Antarctic tardigrade species. Front Physiol 2023; 14:1258932. [PMID: 37766751 PMCID: PMC10520964 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1258932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The Antarctic region has been experiencing some of the planet's strongest climatic changes, including an expected increase of the land temperature. The potential effects of this warming trend will lead ecosystems to a risk of losing biodiversity. Antarctic mosses and lichens host different microbial groups, micro-arthropods and meiofaunal organisms (e.g., tardigrades, rotifers). The eutardigrade Acutuncus antarcticus is considered a model animal to study the effect of increasing temperature due to global warming on Antarctic terrestrial communities. In this study, life history traits and fitness of this species are analyzed by rearing specimens at two different and increasing temperatures (5°C vs. 15°C). Moreover, the first transcriptome analysis on A. antarcticus is performed, exposing adult animals to a gradual increase of temperature (5°C, 10°C, 15°C, and 20°C) to find differentially expressed genes under short- (1 day) and long-term (15 days) heat stress. Acutuncus antarcticus specimens reared at 5°C live longer (maximum life span: 686 days), reach sexual maturity later, lay more eggs (which hatch in longer time and in lower percentage) compared with animals reared at 15°C. The fitness decreases in animals belonging to the second generation at both rearing temperatures. The short-term heat exposure leads to significant changes at transcriptomic level, with 67 differentially expressed genes. Of these, 23 upregulated genes suggest alterations of mitochondrial activity and oxido-reductive processes, and two intrinsically disordered protein genes confirm their role to cope with heat stress. The long-term exposure induces alterations limited to 14 genes, and only one annotated gene is upregulated in response to both heat stresses. The decline in transcriptomic response after a long-term exposure indicates that the changes observed in the short-term are likely due to an acclimation response. Therefore, A. antarcticus could be able to cope with increasing temperature over time, including the future conditions imposed by global climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Giovannini
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Manfrin
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Samuele Greco
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Joel Vincenzi
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Tiziana Altiero
- NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Education and Humanities, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Roberto Guidetti
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy
| | - Piero Giulianini
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Lorena Rebecchi
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mkala EM, Mutinda ES, Wanga VO, Oulo MA, Oluoch WA, nzei J, Waswa EN, Odago W, Nanjala C, Mwachala G, Hu GW, Wang QF. Modeling impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of three endemic Aloe species critically endangered in East Africa. ECOL INFORM 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
8
|
Mkala EM, Mutinda ES, Wanga VO, Oulo MA, Oluoch WA, nzei J, Waswa EN, Odago W, Nanjala C, Mwachala G, Hu GW, Wang QF. Modeling impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of three endemic Aloe species critically endangered in East Africa. ECOL INFORM 2022; 71:101765. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
|
9
|
Strugnell JM, McGregor HV, Wilson NG, Meredith KT, Chown SL, Lau SCY, Robinson SA, Saunders KM. Emerging biological archives can reveal ecological and climatic change in Antarctica. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2022; 28:6483-6508. [PMID: 35900301 PMCID: PMC9826052 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Anthropogenic climate change is causing observable changes in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean including increased air and ocean temperatures, glacial melt leading to sea-level rise and a reduction in salinity, and changes to freshwater water availability on land. These changes impact local Antarctic ecosystems and the Earth's climate system. The Antarctic has experienced significant past environmental change, including cycles of glaciation over the Quaternary Period (the past ~2.6 million years). Understanding Antarctica's paleoecosystems, and the corresponding paleoenvironments and climates that have shaped them, provides insight into present day ecosystem change, and importantly, helps constrain model projections of future change. Biological archives such as extant moss beds and peat profiles, biological proxies in lake and marine sediments, vertebrate animal colonies, and extant terrestrial and benthic marine invertebrates, complement other Antarctic paleoclimate archives by recording the nature and rate of past ecological change, the paleoenvironmental drivers of that change, and constrain current ecosystem and climate models. These archives provide invaluable information about terrestrial ice-free areas, a key location for Antarctic biodiversity, and the continental margin which is important for understanding ice sheet dynamics. Recent significant advances in analytical techniques (e.g., genomics, biogeochemical analyses) have led to new applications and greater power in elucidating the environmental records contained within biological archives. Paleoecological and paleoclimate discoveries derived from biological archives, and integration with existing data from other paleoclimate data sources, will significantly expand our understanding of past, present, and future ecological change, alongside climate change, in a unique, globally significant region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M. Strugnell
- Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture and College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental FutureJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Helen V. McGregor
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life SciencesUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Nerida G. Wilson
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental FutureWestern Australian MuseumWestern AustraliaAustralia
- Research and CollectionsWestern Australian MuseumWestern AustraliaAustralia
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Karina T. Meredith
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental FutureAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology OrganisationLucas HeightsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Steven L. Chown
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Sally C. Y. Lau
- Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture and College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental FutureJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Sharon A. Robinson
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life SciencesUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Krystyna M. Saunders
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life SciencesUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental FutureAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology OrganisationLucas HeightsNew South WalesAustralia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic StudiesUniversity of TasmaniaHobartTasmaniaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|