A retrospective study on titanium sensitivity: Patch test materials and manifestations

Wound Healing Splinting Devices for Faster Access and Use

With the goal of studying skin wound healing and testing new drug treatments to enhance wound healing in rodent models, there is a clear need for improved splinting techniques to increase surgical efficiency and support routine wound monitoring. Splinted wound healing models humanize wound healing in rodents to prevent contraction and instead heal through granulation tissue deposition, increasing the relevance to human wound healing. Current technologies require suturing and heavy wrapping, leading to splint failure and cumbersome monitoring of the wound. In this study, we developed a splint with resealable cap system that provides ease of access for wound inspection, therapeutic treatment delivery, and routine wound imaging without the need to unwrap and wrap the animal. Meanwhile, to overcome the challenges associated with suturing, we also developed adherent splints that can be applied to both hairless or haired mice with minimal wrapping. Both technologies are expected to improve and encourage the adoption of splinted wound healing models.

Effect of ultraviolet treatment on soft tissue healing and bacterial attachment to titania-coated zirconia

Zirconia is the most promising implant abutment material due to its excellent aesthetic effect, good biocompatibility and corrosion resistance. To obtain ideal soft tissue sealing, the implant abutment surface should facilitate cell adhesion and inhibit bacterial colonization. In this study, pre-sintered zirconia was placed in a suspension of titania (TiO2) and zirconium oxychloride (ZrOCl2) and heated in a water bath for dense sintering. A titania coating was prepared on the zirconia surface and subjected to UV irradiation. The surface morphology, elemental composition and chemical state of each group of samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscope, x-ray energy spectrometer, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction. The responses of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) and common oral pathogensStreptococcus mutans(S. mutans) andPorphyromonas gingivalis(P. gingivalis) to modified zirconia were systematically assessed. Our findings demonstrated that the surface of titania-coated zirconia after UV irradiation produced a large number of hydroxyl groups, and its hydrophilicity was significantly improved. Meanwhile, the UV irradiation also greatly removed the hydrocarbon contaminants on the surface of the titania-coated zirconia. The UV-treated titania coating significantly promoted the proliferation, spreading, and up-regulation of adhesion-related genes and proteins of HGFs. Furthermore, the titania coating irradiated with UV could reduce the adhesion, colonization and metabolic activity ofS. mutansandP. gingivalis. Therefore, UV irradiation of titania-coated zirconia can promote the biological behavior of HGFs and exert a significant antibacterial effect, which has broad clinical application prospects for improving soft tissue integration around zirconia abutments.

Streptococcus mitis enhances metal-induced apoptosis in reconstructed human gingiva but not skin

BACKGROUND

Commensal bacteria colonizing oral mucosa and skin play an essential role in maintaining host-microbiome homeostasis. It is unknown whether cytotoxicity resulting from metal ions leaching from medical devices may be influenced by commensal microbes.

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether the extent of apoptosis triggered by nickel or titanium ions is influenced by Streptococcus mitis and whether apoptosis occurs via the intrinsic or extrinsic apoptosis pathway.

METHODS

Reconstructed Human Gingiva (RHG) and Skin (RHS) were topically exposed to titanium or nickel salts in the presence or absence of S. mitis. Cytotoxicity and apoptosis were assessed by histology, immunohistochemistry, TUNEL assay, and Western Blot.

RESULTS

S. mitis alone resulted in negligible cytotoxicity. After metal exposure, localized apoptosis was observed in the epithelium and fibroblasts within the lamina propria hydrogel of both RHG and RHS. S. mitis enhanced metal-mediated apoptosis in gingiva but not in skin. Apoptosis was mediated via the extrinsic pathway caspase 8. Activation of the execution phase of apoptosis occurred via caspases 3 and 7, and PARP-1.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports the finding that metals have irritant, cytotoxic properties resulting in apoptosis when leaching into skin or gingiva. Particularly for gingiva, commensal microbes exaggerate this detrimental effect.

The research status and future direction of polyetheretherketone in dental implant -A comprehensive review

Currently, dental implants primarily rely on the use of titanium and titanium alloys. However, the extensive utilization of these materials in clinical practice has unveiled various problems including stress shielding, corrosion, allergic reactions, cytotoxicity, and image artifacts. As a result, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has emerged as a notable alternative due to its favorable mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, wear resistance, biocompatibility, radiation penetrability and MRI compatibility. Meanwhile, the advancement and extensive application of 3D printing technology has expanded the range of medical applications for PEEK, including artificial spines, skulls, ribs, shinbones, hip joints, and temporomandibular joints. In this review, we aim to assess the advantages and disadvantages of PEEK as a dental implant material, summarize the measures taken to address its shortcomings and their effects, and provide insight into the future potential of PEEK in dental implant applications, with the goal of offering guidance and reference for future research endeavors.

Titanium Allergy: A Retrospective Review of 166 Patch Tested Patients

Background: Although most patients do not develop hypersensitivity reactions to metals in implanted devices, when they do occur, significant morbidity can result. Titanium-based systems are often considered as an alternative option in metal-allergic patients; however, there are few studies published on titanium allergy and allergic reactions to titanium in implants may be overlooked in clinical practice. Methods: Our aim was to further characterize a single institution's experience with titanium patch testing and evaluation of titanium allergy. We performed a retrospective medical record review of 166 patients evaluated for titanium contact allergy between January 2018-August 2023. Of the 166 patients in our cohort, 67 were referred for pre-implant patch testing and 64 for post-implant patch testing; 35 were tested for reasons unrelated to an implant. Results: Twenty-six of the 166 patients were PTP to titanium (15.7% positive rate). Titanium PTP rates were higher for post-implant cases (28.1%, 18/64) compared to pre-implant cases (6.0%, 4/67) (χ2 9.97, p = 0.002). Among 18 titanium PTPs identified for the 64 post-implant cases, 8 were likely relevant, 8 possibly relevant, and 2 not likely relevant. Conclusions: Further studies should be performed to evaluate the incidence of allergy to titanium implants and to continue surveillance of changes in sensitization rates.

Dental biomechanics of root-analog implants in different bone types

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

When implants are applied to restore oral function, the masticatory load on the crown will lead to stress development in all parts of the crown-abutment-implant-bone system. An optimal design of the whole system will be important for sustained function.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this 3-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA) study was to evaluate the influence of the root-analog implant (RAI) design in molar rehabilitation and bone type.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve 3D models of single posterior implant-supported restorations were created according to the zirconia implant design (monotype, 2-piece, or RAI) and bone type (D1, D2, D3, and D4, according to the Misch classification). The models were composed of cortical bone, cancellous bone, implant, cement layers, and a monolithic ceramic crown. For the 2-piece zirconia implant model, the titanium base, prosthetic screw, and framework were also designed. All materials were assumed to behave elastically throughout the entire analysis. The bone was fixed, and an axial loading of 600 N was applied to the contacts on the occlusal surface of the crowns. Results for the crown and implant were obtained in maximum principal stress, as well as the von Mises stress for the model and bone microstrain.

RESULTS

High stress concentration was observed at the intaglio surface of the crowns near the loading region. Regardless of the design, the stress trend in the implant was similar, increasing proportionally to the bone type (D1>D2>D3>D4). RAI showed a homogeneous stress field near the values calculated for the conventional designs, but with lower magnitudes. The 2-piece zirconia model showed the highest stress magnitude regardless of the bone type and, therefore, the highest failure risk. All models showed a higher strain in the cortical bone than in the cancellous bone, located predominantly in the cervical region. A strain analysis showed that both conventional implant models presented similar behavior for D1 and D2 bone types, with an increasing difference for D3 and D4. RAI showed the lowest strain regardless of the bone type.

CONCLUSIONS

Root-analog zirconia implants present a promising biomechanical behavior for dissipating the masticatory load in comparison with conventional screw-shaped implants.

The contribution of metal allergy to the failure of metal alloy implants, with special reference to titanium: Current knowledge and controversies

After almost three-quarters of a century during which contact dermatologists have often struggled to comprehend the relationship between metal allergy and failure of metal-alloy containing implant, it is possible to say that a relationship does exist, particularly for cobalt and chromium, but also for nickel. There is still debate as to whether allergy develops as a consequent of failure but thenceforth contributes to it, or whether sensitisation starts first and induces failure secondarily-opinion probably favours the first. Metal-on-polypropylene articulations were associated with few metal allergic problems but now are less favoured by orthopaedists due to plastic wear products causing osteolysis and pseudotumour formation through local inflammation. New metal alloys are regularly being introduced such that interested dermatologists need to stay on top of the situation. The jury is still out as to whether the recent favouring of titanium-containing alloys will confirm them to be more inert allergenically. Case reports do show some clinical reactions to titanium-containing implants and patch test series have inferred sometimes quite a high background rate of allergy, but interpretation must be tempered by the awareness that titanium salts on patch testing have a tendency to cause irritant reactions. Blood monitoring of metal ion values is now recommended in certain situations after joint replacement and increasing levels may be an indication that allergy with joint failure can develop, in which case patch testing is indicated, and suggested series are available. Predictive patch testing, whilst generally not recommended in the past, has been introduced into some protocols often by non-dermatologists, such that it is now needed for temporo-mandibular joint and Nuss bar insertion, and it can be anticipated that this may become more commonplace in the future. One of the major current deficits for patch testers is standardised guidance on which preparation or preparations to use for suspected titanium allergy. One suggestion is 0.5% titanium sulphate in petrolatum, though experience in at least one centre suggests the use of a battery of titanium salts might be desirable.

Are Allergy-Induced Implant Failures Actually Hypersensitivity Reactions to Titanium? A Literature Review

PURPOSE

This literature review was performed to assess whether implant failures are associated with titanium allergy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases up to April 2021 was conducted, and the obtained articles were independently assessed by two reviewers. Articles describing cases of implant failure in which the cause of implant failure was only identified as allergy were included.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included. Eight studies identified Ti allergy by clinical examinations, of which four used patch tests, three used the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT)/memory lymphocyte immunostimulation assay (MELISA), and one used both tests. Nine studies reported cases of titanium hypersensitivity in combination with other systemic allergy-related disorders, with eight cases also showing positive results for Ni, Hg, Cr, and Co hypersensitivity. Ten papers reported the improvement of symptoms after the removal of the Ti implants and their replacement with zirconia implants, and two of these papers showed good results.

CONCLUSION

Cases of probable titanium allergy included those with true titanium allergies and those with a potentially different cause. However, the differentiation of these cases is difficult. Since no definitive method has been established for diagnosing titanium allergy, a comprehensive diagnosis based on the clinical course and clinical examination using a patch test/LTT/MELISA is necessary. Implant treatment should be performed with caution in patients with any preoperative allergies.

Diagnostic tests for titanium hypersensitivity in implant dentistry: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

There are rising concerns about titanium hypersensitivity reaction regarding dental endosseous implants. This review aims to summarize and compare the validity and reliability of the available dermatological and laboratory diagnostic tests regarding titanium hypersensitivity. The following PICO design was used: In Patients with titanium dental implants (P) does epicutaneous testing (ECT) (I), compared to lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) or Memory Lymphocyte Immunostimulation Assay (MELISA) (C) detect hypersensitivity reactions (O)? A literature search was performed including all studies dealing with this topic. Studies regarding orthopedic implants were excluded.

METHODS

Three databases (MEDLINE PubMed, Cochrane Library, SciELO) were screened for suitable studies and an additional manual search was also performed. Literature regarding hypersensitivity reactions in orthopedic implants, hypersensitivity reactions regarding implants not related to dental or maxillofacial surgery, animal studies and in vitro studies were excluded. A quality assessment of all selected full-text articles was performed. Randomized, controlled trials were evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool I. Cohort studies were assessed according to the New Castle-Ottawa Scale and case series according to Moga et al. (Development of a quality appraisal tool for case series studies using a modified Delphi technique. 2012).

RESULTS

10 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis and available for the endpoint diagnostics of intolerance reactions to titanium dental implants: 2 clinical studies, 7 cohort studies and 1 case series. The potential for bias (internal validity) for these studies was overall rated as high.

CONCLUSIONS

The study of the available literature regarding ECT and MELISA or LTT in patients with suspected titanium hypersensitivity showed inconsistent results in terms of reliability and validity and thus, those tests should be regarded cautiously. There is strong evidence that titanium hypersensitivity in dental implants is associated with innate immunity: unspecific pro-inflammatory responses due to particle induced hyperreactivity of macrophages or toxicological responses especially towards nanoparticles rather than activation of the adaptive immune system. Therefore, tests detecting allergies do not seem expedient and inflammatory clinical signs should be regarded as leading parameters.

Prevalence of Titanium Hypersensitivity in Patients with Titanium Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With increase in exposure to titanium in daily life and its use in medical procedures, there is a greater chance for developing titanium hypersensitivity. Our aim and objective is to examine whether patient patients with titanium implants had a greater incidence of titanium hypersensitivity or not. Titanium is widely considered to have good biocompatibility. A passivating surface layer of TiO₂ is formed when exposed to air which gives it good corrosion resistance. These properties along with its high strength, lightweight, and improvements in smelting technologies have led to its widespread use as an intraosseous and periosteal implant in dentistry and orthopedics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Only case-control studies were used for the meta-analysis. Studies with a sample size of <5 were excluded. Cutaneous and epicutaneous tests were used in the study.

RESULTS

Three studies met the inclusion criteria. Titanium hypersensitivity is more prevalent in patients with titanium implants.

CONCLUSIONS

It is also used in a variety of medical devices such as pacemakers and insulin pumps. Moreover, our external exposure to titanium is increasing. It is used in aerospace, chemical, and automobile industries. It is also used in jewelry, home furnishings, and in making sports and marine equipment. Titanium implants increase the possibility of developing titanium hypersensitivity, and thus, it should be considered as a major factor in unexplained implant failure where other causes have been excluded.

Titanium Allergy Caused by Dental Implants: A Systematic Literature Review and Case Report

(1) Background: Hypersensitivity reactions to metals may arise in predisposed patients chronically exposed to metallic materials, including dental implants made of titanium alloys. The purpose of this article was to systematically review titanium allergy manifestations in patients treated with dental implants and report a clinical case; (2) Methods: A systematic electronic search was performed for articles published in the English language until July 2021. The following eligibility criteria were adopted: (1) Population: individuals undergoing titanium and/or titanium alloy implant-supported rehabilitations; (2) Exposure: peri-implant soft tissue reactions attributable to implant insertion; (3) Outcome: evidence of titanium allergy, diagnostic methods, and forms of resolution; (3) Results: The included studies, in summary, presented evidence that titanium should not be considered an inert material, being able to trigger allergic reactions, and may be responsible for implant failure. A 55-year-old male patient received 3 implants in the posterior region of the left mandible and presented an epulis-like lesion developed from the peri-implant mucosa. The immunohistochemical analysis of the biopsy specimen confirmed the initial diagnosis of allergic reaction to titanium; (4) Conclusions: Although the evidence is weak, and titanium allergy has a low incidence, hypersensitivity reactions should not be underestimated. A rapid and conclusive diagnosis is mandatory to prevent further complications.

Biological activity of titania coating prepared with zirconium oxychloride and titania on zirconia surface

Zirconia is recognized as a promising dental implant material because of its good biocompatibility, sufficient mechanical strength, minimal ion release and aesthetic effects similar to natural teeth. However, the limitations of inert surface of zirconia affect the long-term efficacy of zirconia implants. To enhance the osseointegration of zirconia implants, titania (TiO₂) coating is prepared on the zirconia surface by immersion in a mixed zirconium oxychloride (ZrOCl₂) and TiO₂ suspension in a water bath. The surface and longitudinal section morphology are observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The chemical composition is evaluated through energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The roughness and hydrophilicity of zirconia surface are also examined. A three-point bending test is conducted on the samples to explore the effect of this surface treatment on the mechanical strength of zirconia. Vickers hardness measurements are performed to evaluate the gradient change of the longitudinal section of the zirconia substrate. The MC3T3-E1 cells are seeded on zirconia discs, and a LIVE/DEAD double-staining test is conducted to detect the cytotoxicity of the TiO₂ coating. The cell morphology is studied through fluorescence microscope. The degrees of cell proliferation, mineralization and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity are calculated and compared. Detection of the mRNA expression of osteogenic differentiation-related markers is performed by RT-PCR. A TiO₂ coating is generated on the zirconia surface and significantly improves the surface roughness and hydrophilicity while not adversely affecting the mechanical strength of zirconia. The hardness of the zirconia substrate shows a gradient change. The TiO₂ coating can promote proliferation, spreading and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells. These findings suggest that modifying the surface of zirconia with a TiO₂ coating may have a favourable osteogenic effect.

Patch test-relevant concentrations of metal salts cause localized cytotoxicity, including apoptosis, in skin ex vivo

Background

Metal alloys containing contact sensitizers (nickel, palladium, titanium) are extensively used in medical devices, in particular dentistry and orthopaedic surgery. The skin patch test is used to test for metal allergy.

Objective

To determine whether metal salts, when applied to freshly excised skin at patch test–relevant concentrations and using a method which mimics skin patch testing, cause in changes in the epidermis and dermis.

Methods

Tissue histology, apoptosis, metabolic activity, and inflammatory cytokine release were determined for two nickel salts, two palladium salts, and four titanium salts.

Results

Patch test–relevant concentrations of all metal salts caused localized cytotoxicity. This was observed as epidermis separation at the basement membrane zone, formation of vacuoles, apoptotic nuclei, decreased metabolic activity, and (pro)inflammatory cytokine release. Nickel(II) sulfate hexahydrate, nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate, titanium(IV) bis(ammonium lactato)dihydroxide, and calcium titanate were highly cytotoxic. Palladium(II) chloride, sodium tetrachloropalladate(II), titanium(IV) isopropoxide, and titanium(IV) dioxide showed mild cytotoxicity.

Conclusion

The patch test in itself may be damaging to the skin of the patient being tested. These results need further verification with biopsies obtained during clinical patch testing. The future challenge is to remain above the elicitation threshold at noncytotoxic metal concentrations.

Assessment of cytotoxicity and sensitization potential of intradermally injected tattoo inks in reconstructed human skin

Background

The number of people within the European population having at least one tattoo has increased notably, and with it the number of tattoo‐associated clinical complications. Despite this, safety information and testing regarding tattoo inks remain limited.

Objective

To assess cytotoxicity and sensitization potential of 16 tattoo inks after intradermal injection into reconstructed human skin (RHS).

Methods

Commercially available tattoo inks were injected intradermally into RHS (reconstructed epidermis on a fibroblast‐populated collagen hydrogel) using a permanent makeup device. RHS biopsies, tissue sections, and culture medium were assessed for cytotoxicity (thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide assay [MTT assay]), detrimental histological changes (haematoxylin and eosin staining), and the presence of inflammatory and sensitization cytokines (interleukin [IL]‐1α, IL‐8, IL‐18; enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay).

Results

Varying degrees of reduced metabolic activity and histopathological cytotoxic effects were observed in RHS after ink injection. Five inks showed significantly reduced metabolic activity and enhanced sensitization potential compared with negative controls.

Discussion

Using the RHS model system, four tattoo inks were identified as highly cytotoxic and classified as potential sensitizers, suggesting that allergic contact dermatitis could emerge in individuals carrying these inks. These results indicate that an RHS‐based assessment of cytotoxicity and sensitization potential by intradermal tattoo ink injection is a useful analytical tool to determine ink‐induced deleterious effects.

Patient factors related to early implant failures in the edentulous jaw: A large retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Dental implants provide anchorage for dental prostheses to restore functions for individuals with edentulous jaws. During the healing phase, proper osseointegration is required to prevent early implant failure. More knowledge is needed regarding factors related to early failure of dental implants.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to identify possible risk factors for early implant failure, with respect to anamnestic and clinical parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with edentulous jaws with early implant failure (n = 408) from one referral clinic were compared with a matched control group (n = 408) with no implant failure. Early implant failure was identified during the first year of prosthetic function. Matching was performed on age, gender, year of surgery, type of jaw, and type of implant surface. In addition, data on anamnestic and clinical parameters were collected. The data were analyzed with a multivariable logistic regression model using early implant failure as the binary outcome.

RESULTS

Five anamnestic factors were statistically significant with respect to higher probability for early implant failure: systemic disease, allergies in general, food allergies, smoking, and intake of analgesic medication. Four clinical conditions (i.e., implants in the opposing jaw, low primary stability, reduced bone volume, and healing complications) were also related to higher probability for early implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified nine factors associated with early implant failure, several related to patient's general health. Further investigations are needed to fully understand the causality between the obtained variables and early implant failure.

Allergies to Titanium Dental Implants: What Do We Really Know about Them? A Scoping Review

The purpose of this scoping review was to describe the current state of knowledge and understanding of allergies to titanium dental implants. A scoping review was conducted following the Prisma Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. An electronic search was performed in five databases complemented by manual and grey literature searches. Fifty-two relevant papers were included for final review. Titanium particles can be released from the surfaces of dental implants in a process called tribocorrosion, which may contribute to bone loss due to inflammatory reaction. Diverse mechanisms have been described that may trigger allergy to titanium, as well as the clinical signs that manifest as the allergy develops. Allergies to titanium are uncommon but represent a real possibility that should not be overlooked in patients requiring prosthodontic rehabilitation with dental implants. Allergy can trigger a range of symptoms. Patients who have already been diagnosed with allergies to other metals will be more predisposed to suffering an allergy to titanium. Further investigation is needed in order to measure the true scope of these allergies.

Differential influence of Streptococcus mitis on host response to metals in reconstructed human skin and oral mucosa

BACKGROUND

Skin and oral mucosa are continuously exposed to potential metal sensitizers while hosting abundant microbes, which may influence the host response to sensitizers. This host response may also be influenced by the route of exposure that is skin or oral mucosa, due to their different immune properties.

OBJECTIVE

Determine how commensal Streptococcus mitis influences the host response to nickel sulfate (sensitizer) and titanium(IV) bis(ammonium lactato)dihydroxide (questionable sensitizer) in reconstructed human skin (RHS) and gingiva (RHG).

METHODS

RHS/RHG was exposed to nickel or titanium, in the presence or absence of S. mitis for 24 hours. Histology, cytokine secretion, and Toll-like receptors (TLRs) expression were assessed.

RESULTS

S. mitis increased interleukin (IL)-6, CXCL8, CCL2, CCL5, and CCL20 secretion in RHS but not in RHG; co-application with nickel further increased cytokine secretion. In contrast, titanium suppressed S. mitis-induced cytokine secretion in RHS and had no influence on RHG. S. mitis and metals differentially regulated TLR1 and TLR4 in RHS, and predominantly TLR4 in RHG.

CONCLUSION

Co-exposure of S. mitis and nickel resulted in a more potent innate immune response in RHS than in RHG, whereas titanium remained inert. These results indicate the important influence of commensal microbes and the route of exposure on the host's response to metals.

Nanotoxicology: The Need for a Human Touch?

With the ever-expanding number of manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs) under development there is a vital need for nanotoxicology studies that test the potential for MNMs to cause harm to health. An extensive body of work in cell cultures and animal models is vital to understanding the physicochemical characteristics of MNMs and the biological mechanisms that underlie any detrimental actions to cells and organs. In human subjects, exposure monitoring is combined with measurement of selected health parameters in small panel studies, especially in occupational settings. However, the availability of further in vivo human data would greatly assist the risk assessment of MNMs. Here, the potential for controlled inhalation exposures of MNMs in human subjects is discussed. Controlled exposures to carbon, gold, aluminum, and zinc nanoparticles in humans have already set a precedence to demonstrate the feasibility of this approach. These studies have provided considerable insight into the potential (or not) of nanoparticles to induce inflammation, alter lung function, affect the vasculature, reach the systemic circulation, and accumulate in other organs. The need for further controlled exposures of MNMs in human volunteers - to establish no-effect limits, biological mechanisms, and provide vital data for the risk assessment of MNMs - is advocated.

Titanium salts tested in reconstructed human skin with integrated MUTZ-3-derived Langerhans cells show an irritant rather than a sensitizing potential

BACKGROUND

The nature of clinically related adverse reactions to titanium is still unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether titanium salts have irritant or sensitizing potential in a reconstructed human skin (RHS) model with integrated Langerhans cells (LCs).

METHODS

RHS-LCs (ie, reconstructed epidermis) containing primary differentiated keratinocytes and CFSE⁺ CD1a⁺ -LCs generated from the MUTZ-3 cell line on a primary fibroblast-populated collagen hydrogel (dermis) were topically exposed to titanium(IV) bis(ammonium lactato)dihydroxide (TiALH). LC migration and plasticity were determined.

RESULTS

TiALH resulted in CFSE⁺ CD1a⁺ -LC migration out of the epidermis. Neutralizing antibodies to CCL5 and CXCL12 showed that LC migration was CCL5 and not CXCL12 mediated. LCs accumulating within the dermis after TiALH exposure were CFSE⁺ Lang⁺ CD68⁺ which is characteristic of a phenotypic switch of MUTZ-LC to a macrophage-like cell. Furthermore, TiALH did not result in increased interleukin (IL)-1β or CCR7 messenger RNA (mRNA) in the dermis, but did result in increased IL-10 mRNA. In addition, monocultures of MUTZ-LCs failed to increase LC maturation biomarkers CD83, CD86, and CXCL-8 when exposed to noncytotoxic concentrations of four different titanium salts.

CONCLUSION

These results classify titanium salts as irritants rather than sensitizers and indicate that titanium implant-related complaints could be due to localized irritant-mediated inflammation arising from leachable agents rather than a titanium metal allergy.

Non-heat inactivated autologous serum increases accuracy of in vitro CFSE lymphocyte proliferation test (LPT) for nickel

Background

Skin patch testing is still seen as the gold standard for the diagnosis of allergic hypersensitivity. For several metals and for patients with a suspected adverse reaction to their medical device implant material, patch testing can be unreliable. The current alternative to metal allergy patch testing is the in vitro lymphocyte proliferation test (LPT) using tritiated thymidine. This method is well‐established but requires handling of radioactive material, often uses heat‐inactivated allogenic human pooled serum and cannot determine T cell subsets.

Objective

To develop a radioactive free LPT by using carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and to evaluate the influence of serum source (heat‐inactivated human pooled serum [HI HPS] vs autologous serum) on the sensitivity and specificity of the nickel‐specific LPT.

Methods

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from nickel‐allergic patients and healthy controls were collected, labelled with CFSE and cultured in medium containing 10% HI HPS or 10% autologous serum with or without additional T cell skewing cytokine cocktails (Th1: IL‐7/IL‐12, Th2: IL‐7/IL‐4 or Th17: IL‐7/IL‐23/IL‐1β) in the absence or presence of NiSO₄. The stimulation index (SI) was calculated as the ratio of divided cells, that is the percentage of CFSE^low/neg CD3⁺CD4⁺ T‐lymphocytes upon nickel stimulation compared to the percentage of CFSE^low/neg CD3⁺CD4⁺ T‐lymphocytes without antigen. These results were compared with the history of Ni allergy, patch test results and the MELISA test.

Results

Autologous serum positively influenced Ni‐specific proliferation while HI HPS negatively influenced Ni‐specific proliferation. The test protocol analysing CD4⁺ cells and autologous serum without skewing cytokines scored the best diagnostic values (sensitivity 95%; specificity 93%; and overall accuracy 94%) compared to the parallel test using HI HPS (accuracy 60%). Cytokine supplements did not further improve the test protocol which used autologous serum. The protocol using HI HPS could be further improved by addition of the cytokine skewing cocktails.

Conclusions

Here, we describe an optimized and highly accurate flow cytometric LPT which comprises of CFSE‐labelled cells cultured in autologous serum (not heat inactivated) and without the presence of T cell skewing cytokines.

Clinical relevance

The sensitivity and specificity of LPT is enhanced, compared to HI HPS, when autologous serum without skewing cytokines is used.

Contact Allergy-Emerging Allergens and Public Health Impact

Contact allergy (sensitisation) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) resulting from it have a considerable public health impact. For the present review, all pertinent articles were systematically searched via Medline and Web of Science™; additionally, all available issues of the journals "Contact Dermatitis" and "Dermatitis" were manually searched, covering the years 2018-2019, thereby extending and re-focusing a previous similar review. New allergens, or previously described allergens found in a new exposure context or of other current importance, are described in sections according to substance classes, e.g., metals, preservatives, fragrances. As a common finding in many investigations, a lack of information on product composition has been noted, for instance, regarding a newly described allergen in canvas shoes (dimethylthiocarbamylbenzothiazole sulfide) and, most notably, absence of co-operation from manufacturers of glucose-monitoring devices and insulin pumps, respectively. These latter devices have been shown to cause severe ACD in a considerable number of diabetic patients caused by the liberation of isobornyl acrylate and N,N'-dimethylacrylamide, respectively, as demonstrated by an international collaboration between dermatologists and chemists. Improved and complete ingredient labelling for all types of products, and not just cosmetics, must be put on the legislative agenda.

Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement: Stick to Stock or Optimization by Customization?

Purpose

This article aims to compare the difference in postoperative results in patients treated with either a patient-specific (PSI) or a stock temporomandibular total joint replacement system.

Materials and Methods

The investigators performed a systematic review concerning postoperative results after placement of either a stock total joint replacement system or a PSI. PubMed Central, Web of Science, Cochrane Library Plus, Wiley Online Library, and EMBASE were used to conduct this search. All articles up to August 15, 2018, were scrutinized. All included articles were nonrandomized cohort studies. Maximal mouth opening (MMO) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain and diet before and after surgery were evaluated. The Methodological Index for NonRandomized Studies scale was used for quality assessment. Weighted mean difference was calculated and pooled by meta-analysis using random-effect models.

Results

The search identified 1581 articles, of which 15 were included. The average risk of bias was low. Both systems achieved significant increases in MMO and decreased VAS pain scores at 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery. No significant difference was found between the system types. Both achieved significant improvements in dietary VAS scores, with a more significant improvement for stock implants.

Conclusions

Due to the lack of detailed diagnostic evaluation tools allowing proper start-point categorization, there is a significant risk for selection bias in the pooled data. The PSI is more frequently chosen for cases with more significant joint degeneration, skewing postoperative results. A patient-fitted implant can provide significant operative and patient-centered advantages over a stock implant, which will likely be confirmed when observational cohort studies have included indications like the ones for stock prostheses. Furthermore, while current US Food and Drug Administration-approved stock implants contain cobalt -chromium -molybdenum, the newly manufactured PSI are made of titanium alloy, diminishing the risks of morbidity and implant failure.

A retrospective study on titanium sensitivity: Patch test materials and manifestations

Background

Titanium is being increasingly used. Although it is considered to be a non‐allergenic material, allergic reactions to it have been reported. Titanium dioxide has been found to be an unreliable patch test material. Few studies to date have profiled titanium allergy, and it therefore remains difficult to distinguish its manifestations.

Objectives

To evaluate alternatives for titanium dioxide as a patch test preparation, and to profile titanium reactions and manifestations.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted with 458 patients who underwent patch testing with at least 1 of 5 different titanium salts.

Results

At least 1 positive result was noted in 5.7% of the patients. The frequency of positive results for the tested salts ranged from 0.9% to 7.9%. Titanium(IV) oxalate hydrate had the highest yield and titanium dioxide the lowest. Erythema, dermatitis and local swelling were the most common objective complaints. In 16 (61.5%) patients, the test result had partial or full clinical relevance.

Conclusions

No titanium‐specific risk factors and clinical picture could be identified. Titanium dioxide is not adequately sensitive for identifying titanium allergy. The titanium salts seem to be possible superior patch test preparations, but appear to be unsuitable if used singly. The patient's medical history and clinical picture remain crucial in the diagnostic work‐up.