The long-term effect of dupilumab on chronic hand eczema in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis - 52 week results from the Dutch BioDay registry

A Practical Approach to Chronic Hand Eczema

Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a multifactorial condition with significant physical, psychological, and socioeconomic burdens. Its complex pathogenesis often does not align with clinical presentation, leading to overlapping etiologic subtypes, including allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), and atopic hand eczema (AHE). While patch testing remains the gold standard for confirming ACD, its clinical utility can be limited owing to frequent subtype overlap, impracticality of allergen avoidance, and practical considerations relating to the process and availability of patch testing itself. This review provides a practical, clinician-oriented framework for managing CHE, emphasizing the importance of clinical judgment in deciding when patch testing is indicated versus when prompt treatment should take priority. We explore the role of patch testing in CHE within the context of real-world practice, incorporating global perspectives where they inform practical clinical decision-making. With the emergence of targeted therapies addressing CHE immunopathogenesis, balancing traditional diagnostic approaches with early, effective treatment is increasingly necessary. A streamlined, patient-centered strategy balancing diagnostic thoroughness with timely interventions may aid clinicians in optimizing outcomes in this complex disease.

A Review of Hand Eczema Subtypes: Clinical Features, Biomarkers and Treatment Strategies

Hand eczema is a common dermatological condition that significantly impairs quality of life. The classification of hand eczema has been considered an essential step for its management. The diagnosis of hand eczema relies on the aetiological and clinical features of hand lesions, a process complicated by the heterogeneous presentations and the considerable overlap among its subtypes. However, the investigation of hand eczema biomarkers and the advent of targeted therapies have shed light on the underlying pathogenic mechanisms. This review adopts a subtype-specific approach to hand eczema, addressing clinical, pathogenic and therapeutic factors, with the aim of providing a comprehensive understanding of this heterogeneous condition from the perspective of its subtypes.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in chronic hand eczema: a systematic review

Chronic hand eczema (CHE) significantly impacts patients' quality of life and remains challenging to manage, especially in topical steroid-refractory cases. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the interleukin-4 receptor alpha, has demonstrated efficacy in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and various other type 2 inflammatory conditions. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of CHE. A comprehensive search was performed of the Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases from their inception until March 2024, identifying 20 studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective and prospective studies, and case reports, involving 366 participants aged 12 years and older with CHE treated with dupilumab. Effectiveness was assessed using the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI), Physician Global Assessment (PGA), and Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DQLI), while safety was evaluated through reported adverse events (AE). Dupilumab consistently improved CHE symptoms, with 40.3% of RCT participants achieving Hand and Foot Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 by week 16, and 90% achieving HECSI-75 among treated groups. Improvements were observed across various CHE subtypes, including atopic, irritant contact, and allergic contact dermatitis. Dupilumab was generally well-tolerated, with a 1.64% discontinuation rate due to minor AE, such as conjunctivitis. While herpes was reported in RCTs, no AE were reported in case studies. Dupilumab appears to be a promising treatment option for CHE, offering significant efficacy and a favorable safety profile. However, further research is needed to explore its long-term effectiveness, optimal dosing strategies, and cost-effectiveness.

Hand eczema

Hand eczema is a highly prevalent skin disease and one of the most common work-related disorders. In up to two-thirds of individuals affected by hand eczema, the disease becomes chronic and results in substantial personal and occupational disability. Manifestations of chronic hand eczema vary in severity and appearance over time, and people with eczema typically experience itch, pain, and a burning sensation. The pathophysiology of chronic hand eczema is multifactorial. Major risk factors are current or past atopic dermatitis and excessive or prolonged exposure to irritants or allergens. Based on the suspected main causes, chronic hand eczema is commonly classified into irritant, allergic, and atopic hand eczema. Diagnosis and assessment can be complex, and management is often challenging. Strategies include structured education, avoidance of trigger factors, primary to tertiary prevention, topical anti-inflammatory treatment with glucocorticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, or januskinase inhibitors, phototherapy, systemic retinoids, and off-label use of immunosuppressive drugs. Topical and systemic immunomodulatory therapies approved for atopic dermatitis could be used in severe atopic hand eczema and some of them are under clinical development for chronic hand eczema. Additional research is needed to better understand chronic hand eczema subtypes and underlying mechanisms, and the comparative effectiveness and safety of therapies. This Review combines established knowledge with ongoing changes in our understanding of the disease and their implications for prevention, management, and future research.

Psychological burden, anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with hand eczema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Living with hand eczema (HE) has been associated with impaired quality of life (QoL), having anxiety and depression but the magnitude of association is not clear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the psychological burden in terms of anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with HE.

METHODS

Several databases were systematically searched. Weighted means with standard deviation (SD) were calculated for disease severity, QoL, depression and/or anxiety scores among patients with HE. For studies presenting QoL, depression and/or anxiety scores in patients with HE and in controls the weighted means were compared with an unpaired t-test. In studies reporting Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the correlation between HECSI and DLQI was estimated using Spearman's rank correlation (rs).

RESULTS

In total, 81 studies encompassing 17,835 patients with HE and 31,541 controls were included. The weighted mean DLQI was 10.66 (SD 8.93) corresponding to a moderate-to-large effect on QoL and a strong correlation (rs: 0.76, 95% CI:0.56-0.87) between DLQI and HECSI was observed. The mean EQ-5D-VAS was significantly lower in patients with HE compared with controls (68.03 (SD 10.52) vs. 80.63 (SD 1.17), p < 0.00001). Patients with HE had higher mean HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) anxiety score (7.4 vs. 5.8, p = 0.0008) than controls but not higher HADS depression score (6.5 vs. 5.7, p = 0.32). Only one study assessed risk of anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation showing an increased odds of all diseases among patients with HE compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand eczema has a moderate-to-severe impact on quality of life with a strong correlation between disease severity and impact on quality of life. Patients with hand eczema have an impact on QoL comparable to other chronic diseases when measured with generic QoL scoring systems.

Th1 and Th2 cytokine expression in hyperkeratotic chronic hand eczema and the role of Tofacitinib a oral JAK inhibitor

Tissue cytokines in chronic hand eczema (CHE) can predict targeted therapy with novel drugs including JAK inhibitors. Our primary objective was to assess the tissue expression of cytokines of Th1 and Th2 cell lines in CHE patients and to study the efficacy of oral tofacitinib. We recruited patients presenting with recalcitrant CHE. Lesional and non-lesional tissue samples were assessed for Th1(IFN-γ, TNF-α) and Th2 related cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, IL-2,) using real time PCR. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily was initiated with 4 weekly assessment and we also noted relapses post therapy.Of 21 refractory hyperkeratotic CHE patients, cytokine analysis was performed in 11 patients which showed upregulation of IL-4 [n = 5/11, 1.87-fold increase], TNF-α (n = 5/11, 5.13-fold) and IFN-γ (n = 6/11, 1.98-fold) as compared to uninvolved skin. All patients (100%) had used topical corticosteroids (TCS) and 4/21 (19%) had failed methotrexate and 2/21 (9.5%) had failed acitretin. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily was given in 15/21 patients. The mean time to achieve hand eczema severity index 90 (HECSI 90) was 4 weeks (mean duration of treatment:5.8 months, n = 12). Side effects were observed in 4/12 (33.3%) patients and relapse was noted in 3/12 (25%) patients after a mean duration of 7 months after discontinuation of tofacitinib. Tofacitinib (pan-JAK inhibitor) showed an excellent response in refractory CHE patients with predominant tissue Th1/Th2 cells related cytokine expression.

Alitretinoin versus phototherapy as the first-line treatment in adults with severe chronic hand eczema: the ALPHA RCT

Background

Hand eczema is common and a cause of morbidity and occupational disability. When education, irritant/contact allergen avoidance, moisturisation and topical corticosteroids are insufficient to control chronic hand eczema, ultraviolet therapy or systemic immune-modifying drugs are used. There is no treatment pathway generally accepted by UK dermatologists.

Primary objective

Compare alitretinoin and ultraviolet therapy as first-line therapy in terms of disease activity at 12 weeks post planned start of treatment.

Design

Prospective, multicentre, open-label, two-arm parallel group, adaptive randomised controlled trial with one planned interim analysis, and an economic evaluation.

Setting

UK secondary care dermatology outpatient clinics.

Participants

Patients with severe chronic hand eczema unresponsive to at least 4 weeks of treatment with potent topical corticosteroids.

Primary end point

Natural logarithm of the Hand Eczema Severity Index + 1, 12 weeks post planned start of treatment.

Randomisation

Participants randomised 1 : 1 by minimisation to alitretinoin or ultraviolet therapy for 12 to 24 weeks.

Blinding

Blinded primary end-point assessor.

Results

Intention-to-treat population: 441 (100.0%) participants; 220 (49.9%) alitretinoin and 221 (50.1%) ultraviolet therapy. At least one dose was received by 212 (96.4%) alitretinoin and 196 (88.7%) ultraviolet therapy participants.

Primary outcome

The unadjusted median (interquartile range) relative change in hand eczema severity index at 12 weeks was 30% (10-70%) of that at baseline for alitretinoin compared with 50% (20-100%) for ultraviolet therapy. There was a statistically significant benefit of alitretinoin compared with ultraviolet therapy at 12 weeks, with an estimated fold change or relative difference (95% confidence interval) = 0.66 (0.52 to 0.82), p = 0.0003 at 12 weeks. There was no evidence of a difference at 24 or 52 weeks, with the estimated fold change (95% confidence interval) equal to 0.92 (0.798 to 1.08) and 1.27 (0.97 to 1.67), respectively.

Primary analysis results were consistent for secondary end points

Fifty-nine per cent allocated to alitretinoin and 61% allocated to ultraviolet therapy achieved a clear/almost clear assessment during the trial period. Differential treatment compliance observed: 145 (65.9%) alitretinoin and 53 (24.0%) ultraviolet therapy participants confirmed compliance (≥ 80% received, no treatment breaks > 7 days during first 12 weeks). High levels of missing data were observed.

Safety

One hundred and thirty-five reportable adverse events across 79 participants, 55 (25.0%) alitretinoin and 24 (10.9%) ultraviolet therapy. Four serious adverse events (two alitretinoin, two ultraviolet therapy). Four pregnancies reported (three alitretinoin, one ultraviolet therapy). No new safety signals were detected.

Conclusion

As a first-line therapy, alitretinoin showed more rapid improvement and superiority to ultraviolet therapy at week 12. This difference was not observed at later time points. Alitretinoin is cost-effective at weeks 12 and 52. Ultraviolet therapy is cost-effective after 10 years, with a high degree of uncertainty. Hand eczema severity index may be a useful primary outcome measure for hand eczema trials; ALPHA results will inform future trials.

Limitations

Treatment compliance was poor for ultraviolet therapy. Regular twice weekly treatment was not received by most patients. Assessment of long-term effects of randomised treatments was complicated by use of second-line treatments post treatment phase.

Further work

Further analysis of substudies and pilot data will provide valuable information for future studies. A clear need for better therapeutic approaches for severe chronic hand eczema remains. Future studies will need to further address long-term benefits of treatments given.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN80206075.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 12/186/01) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 59. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Dupilumab treatment improves signs, symptoms, quality of life, and work productivity in patients with atopic hand and foot dermatitis: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite high disease burden, systemic treatment options for patients with atopic hand and/or foot dermatitis (H/F AD) are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate efficacy and safety of dupilumab in H/F AD using specific instruments for assessing disease severity on hands and feet.

METHODS

In this multicenter phase 3 trial, adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe H/F AD were randomized to dupilumab monotherapy (regimen approved for generalized AD), or matched placebo. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving Hand and Foot Investigator's Global Assessment score 0 or 1 at week 16. Secondary prespecified endpoints assessed the severity and extent of signs, symptom intensity (itch, pain), quality of life, and sleep.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients (adults = 106, adolescents = 27) were randomized to dupilumab (n = 67) or placebo (n = 66). At week 16, significantly more patients receiving dupilumab (n = 27) than placebo (n = 11) achieved Hand and Foot Investigator's Global Assessment score 0 or 1 (40.3% vs 16.7%; P = .003). All other prespecified endpoints were met. Safety was consistent with the known AD dupilumab profile.

LIMITATIONS

Short-term, 16-week treatment period.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab monotherapy resulted in significant improvements across different domains of H/F AD with acceptable safety, supporting dupilumab as a systemic treatment approach for this often difficult to treat condition.

Transcriptomics- and Genomics-Guided Drug Repurposing for the Treatment of Vesicular Hand Eczema

Vesicular hand eczema (VHE), a clinical subtype of hand eczema (HE), showed limited responsiveness to alitretinoin, the only approved systemic treatment for severe chronic HE. This emphasizes the need for alternative treatment approaches. Therefore, our study aimed to identify drug repurposing opportunities for VHE using transcriptomics and genomics data. We constructed a gene network by combining 52 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from a VHE transcriptomics study with 3 quantitative trait locus (QTL) genes associated with HE. Through network analysis, clustering, and functional enrichment analyses, we investigated the underlying biological mechanisms of this network. Next, we leveraged drug-gene interactions and retrieved pharmaco-transcriptomics data from the DrugBank database to identify drug repurposing opportunities for (V)HE. We developed a drug ranking system, primarily based on efficacy, safety, and practical and pricing factors, to select the most promising drug repurposing candidates. Our results revealed that the (V)HE network comprised 78 genes that yielded several biological pathways underlying the disease. The drug-gene interaction search together with pharmaco-transcriptomics lookups revealed 123 unique drug repurposing opportunities. Based on our drug ranking system, our study identified the most promising drug repurposing opportunities (e.g., vitamin D analogues, retinoids, and immunomodulating drugs) that might be effective in treating (V)HE.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in the Treatment of Hand Eczema: A Retrospective Study

Background: Hand eczema (HE) is a prevalent chronic condition that exerts a substantial and enduring adverse effect on quality of life (QoL) and imposes an economic burden on society. Managing HE poses challenges due to the limited effectiveness and potential adverse effects associated with many currently available topical and systemic treatments. Methods: This article examines twenty-one patients affected by HE treated with dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin IL-4 and IL-13 signaling. This involves a retrospective descriptive statistical analysis. Results: At week 6, HECSI-75 was achieved by 12 patients (57.9%). The proportion of patients meeting the HECSI-75 criteria steadily increased over the observation weeks, reaching 90% at week 16 and 100% at week 104. Furthermore, HECSI-90 and HECSI-100 were achieved by 75% and 60% of patients at week 16 and by 100% and 85% of patients at week 68, respectively. All patients who reached week 104 maintained complete disease remission according to HECSI 100. Conclusions: In all patients, dupilumab was shown to be an effective drug in achieving disease clearance, as indicated by all the parameters considered at each evaluation point (Week 6, Week 16, Week 32, Week 52, Week 68, Week 84, and Week 104), in comparison to the initial baseline.

Real-World Clinical Experience of Dupilumab in the Treatment of Chronic Palmo-Plantar Eczema in Patients with Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: 52-Week Follow-Up

Background: Hand-foot eczema (HFE) are special locations of dermatitis, which are often associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) and have a significant negative impact on the quality of life, demanding a clinically relevant improvement. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of eczema localized in hands and/or feet in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: Retrospective multicenter study of adult patients with HFE treated with dupilumab for their AD. Patients with other concomitantly systemic immunosuppressive treatments did not undergo a washout period. The severity of palmar and/or plantar involvement was assessed using the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scale on a scale of 0 ( = clear) to 5 ( = very severe). Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and NRS-pruritus scales were also evaluated. One hundred percent of patients reached week 16, while 67/84 reached week 52 of follow-up. Results: A total of 84 patients were included 86.69% of patients showed a reduction in PGA-Hand, and 80.34% in PGA-Foot at week 52, EASI improvement was reached by 83.55% of patients at week 16 and 87.35% at week 52. Reduction of pruritus (≥4 points in NRS-pruritus scale) was 73.01% at week 16 and 80.67% at week 52. No differences in response to dupilumab were observed in the different subtypes of palmo-plantar dermatitis. Conclusions: The results obtained in our study suggest that dupilumab may be an effective and safe therapeutic option for the treatment of dermatitis localized in hands and/or feet.

Chronic hand eczema: A prevalent disease in the general population associated with reduced quality of life and poor overall health measures

BACKGROUND

The impact of hand eczema (HE) on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) has only been sparsely studied in a general population setting, and never by use of the disease specific Quality Of Life in Hand eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ).

OBJECTIVES

To examine the HRQoL of unselected individuals with HE using the QOLHEQ. Further, to provide prevalence estimates of severe and chronic HE (CHE), and to contrast overall health related outcomes between individuals with and without HE.

METHODS

In this nationwide, cross-sectional study a questionnaire covering questions on HE related outcomes, and overall health was sent to a random sample of 100 000 Danish adults via a secure digital mailbox, linked to their unique civil registration numbers. Data on demographic characteristics were retrieved from the civil registration system. Individuals reporting HE, further answered the QOLHEQ and other disease specific questions.

RESULTS

The response rate was 42.7% (n = 42 691). Total estimates of lifetime, 1-year and point prevalences of HE were 24.4%, 13.3% and 5.8%. Of individuals reporting a 1-year prevalence, 35.1% reported moderate-severe disease and 82.6% CHE. Individuals with HE were more likely to report less good or poor overall health, and sick leave (any reason), compared to those without. In the 2176 (92.5%) with current HE who completed the QOLHEQ, median QOLHEQ scores corresponded to a moderate impairment of the symptoms and treatment and prevention domains and a slight impairment overall and for the emotions and functioning domains. Factors that were strongly associated with moderate to severe HRQoL impairment included severe, chronic and occupational HE as well as female sex.

CONCLUSIONS

HE is highly prevalent, bears a considerable burden on society and significantly affects the lives of impacted individuals. Our findings indicate a necessity for targeted prevention aimed at high-risk groups, and support and treatment for those most affected.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic hand eczema with inadequate response or intolerance to alitretinoin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment options for patients with chronic hand eczema (CHE) are scarce. Dupilumab is licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and has shown promising results for the treatment of hand eczema in other studies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adult patients with severe CHE (subtypes recurrent vesicular hand eczema or chronic fissured hand eczema) who have an inadequate response/intolerance to alitretinoin, or when alitretinoin is medically inadvisable.

METHODS

In this 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept phase IIb trial, patients with severe CHE were randomized 2 : 1 to dupilumab 300 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Patients visited the outpatient clinic at the initiation of the study drug, and every 4 weeks until 16 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving at least a 75% improvement on the Hand Eczema Severity Index score (HECSI-75) at week 16. Adverse events were monitored during each visit. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04512339).

RESULTS

In total, 30 patients were randomized, and 29 patients received the assigned study drug (dupilumab n = 20, placebo n = 9). At week 16, more patients achieved HECSI-75 in the dupilumab group than in the placebo group {95% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.1-99.7] vs. 33% [95% CI 9.0-69.1]}. Dupilumab also showed greater least square mean percentage change from baseline to week 16 in peak pruritus Numerical Rating Scale compared with placebo [-66.5 ± 10.7 (95% CI -88.6 to -44.5) vs. -25.3 ± 17.0 (95% CI -60.1-9.4)]. Adverse events were similar for the dupilumab and placebo groups and were mostly mild. There were no serious adverse events, nor did any of the adverse events lead to discontinuation of the study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab was efficacious and well tolerated. Larger studies of longer duration are needed to provide more evidence on the -efficacy of dupilumab in CHE. Moreover, larger studies could also enable comparisons between clinical subtypes or aetiological -diagnoses.

S2k-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Prävention und Therapie des Handekzems: S2k guideline diagnosis, prevention and therapy of hand eczema

Die S2k‐Leitlinie „Diagnostik, Prävention und Therapie des Handekzems (HE)“ gibt auf der Grundlage eines evidenz‐ und konsensbasierten Ansatzes konkrete Handlungsanweisungen und Empfehlungen für die Diagnostik, Prävention und Therapie des HE. Die Leitlinie wurde auf der Grundlage der deutschen Leitlinie „Management von Handekzemen“ aus dem Jahr 2009 und der aktuellen Leitlinie der European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) „Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention and treatment of hand eczema“ aus dem Jahr 2022 erstellt. Allgemeines Ziel der Leitlinie ist es, Dermatologen und Allergologen in der Praxis und Klinik eine akzeptierte, evidenzbasierte Entscheidungshilfe für die Auswahl sowie Durchführung einer geeigneten und suffizienten Therapie für Patienten mit Handekzemen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Die Leitlinie basiert auf zwei Cochrane‐Reviews zu therapeutischen und präventiven Interventionen beim HE. Die übrigen Kapitel wurden überwiegend basierend auf nicht systematischen Literaturrecherchen durch die Expertengruppe erarbeitet und konsentiert. Die Expertenkommission bestand aus Mitgliedern von allergologischen und berufsdermatologischen Fachgesellschaften und Arbeitsgruppen, einer Patientenvertretung und Methodikern. Im Rahmen einer Konsensuskonferenz am 15.09.2022 wurden die Vorschläge für die Empfehlungen und Kernaussagen unter Verwendung eines nominalen Gruppenprozesses konsentiert. Der strukturierte Konsensfindungsprozess wurde professionell moderiert. Die vorliegende Leitlinie hat eine Gültigkeit bis zum 22.02.2028.

S2k guideline diagnosis, prevention, and therapy of hand eczema

The consensus-based guideline "Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of hand eczema (HE)" provides concrete instructions and recommendations for diagnosis, prevention, and therapy of HE based on an evidence- and consensus-based approach. The guideline was created based on the German guideline "Management von Handekzemen" from 2009 and the current guideline of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) "Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of hand eczema" from 2022. The general goal of the guideline is to provide dermatologists and allergologists in practice and clinics with an accepted, evidence-based decision-making tool for selecting and conducting suitable and sufficient therapy for patients with hand eczema. The guideline is based on two Cochrane reviews of therapeutic and preventive interventions for HE. The remaining chapters were mainly developed and consented based on non-systematic literature research by the expert group. The expert group consisted of members of allergological and occupational dermatological professional associations and working groups, a patient representative, and methodologists. The proposals for recommendations and key statements were consented by using a nominal group process during a consensus conference on September 15, 2022. The structured consensus-building process was professionally moderated. This guideline is valid until February 22, 2028.

Circulating biomarkers are associated with disease severity of chronic hand eczema and atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Although chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a highly prevalent and disabling skin disease, it is currently unknown if CHE is associated with systemic inflammation.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the plasma inflammatory signature of CHE.

METHODS

Using Proximity Extension Assay technology, we assessed 266 inflammatory and cardiovascular disease risk proteins in the plasma of 40 healthy controls, 57 patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) with active lesions, 11 with CHE and a history of AD (CHEPREVIOUS_AD), and 40 with CHE and no history of AD (CHENO_AD). Filaggrin gene mutation status was also assessed. Protein expression was compared between groups and according to disease severity. Correlation analyses for biomarkers, and clinical- and self-reported variables, were performed.

RESULTS

Very severe CHENO_AD was associated with systemic inflammation when compared with controls. Levels of T helper (Th)2- and Th1-, general inflammation and eosinophil activation markers increased with severity of CHENO_AD, primarily being significantly increased in very severe disease. Significant, positive correlations were found between markers from these pathways and severity of CHENO_AD. Moderate-to-severe but not mild AD displayed systemic inflammation. The Th2 markers C-C motif chemokine (CCL)17 and CCL13 (also known as monocyte chemotactic protein 4) were the top differentially expressed proteins in both very severe CHENO_AD and moderate-to-severe AD, showing a higher fold change and significance in AD. CCL17 and CCL13 levels further correlated positively with disease severity in both CHENO_AD and AD.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic Th2-driven inflammation is shared between very severe CHE with no history of AD, and moderate-to-severe AD, suggesting that Th2 cell targeting could be effective in several CHE subtypes.

[New guideline and treatment options for hand eczema]

Due to its high prevalence and associated socioeconomic consequences, hand eczema is a burden for those affected and for society. The various hand eczema subtypes must be differentiated from each other through structured anamnesis and diagnostics in order to initiate cause-related preventive measures in addition to symptomatic therapy. There are new developments in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of hand eczema. The diagnostic possibilities are being expanded through molecular methods. Modern topical and systemic therapies offer promising treatment options for patients with atopic but also chronic hand eczema regardless of the underlying etiology.

Dupilumab in Inflammatory Skin Diseases: A Systematic Review

Dupilumab was first approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) and blocks the signaling of interleukin (IL)-4 and -13. Several other chronic skin conditions share mechanistic overlaps with AD in their pathophysiology, i.e., are linked to type 2 inflammation. Most recently, dupilumab was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for prurigo nodularis (PN). Given its relatively good safety profile, effective off-label use of dupilumab has been reported for a multitude of dermatologic diseases and several clinical trials for dermatologic skin conditions are currently ongoing. We conducted a systematic review of applications of dupilumab in dermatology other than AD and PN by searching the databases PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library as well as the clinical trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov. We found several reports for effective treatment of bullous autoimmune diseases, eczema, prurigo, alopecia areata, chronic spontaneous urticaria, Netherton syndrome and a variety of other chronic inflammatory skin diseases.

Experiences from daily practice of upadacitinib treatment on atopic dermatitis with a focus on hand eczema: Results from the BioDay registry

BACKGROUND

Real-world data on the effectiveness of upadacitinib on atopic dermatitis (AD), hand eczema (HE) and HE in the context of AD are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib on AD and on HE in patients with AD.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study includes clinical outcomes: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI), Photographic guide; and PROMs: average pruritus and pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score of the past week, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Patient-Oriented Eczema, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT), Patient Global Assessment of Disease (PGAD), Quality Of Life Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ) at baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 of upadacitinib-treated patients. Adverse events were monitored during each visit.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included, of which 32 patients had HE. At Week 16, EASI-75 was achieved by 50.0%. Absolute cutoff score NRS-pruritus ≤4 was reached by 62.5%, POEM ≤7 by 37.5%, DLQI ≤5 by 59.4%, ADCT <7 by 68.8%, and PGAD rating of at least 'good' by 53.1%. HECSI-75 was achieved by 59.3% and (almost) clear on the Photographic guide by 74.1%. The minimally important change in QOLHEQ was achieved by 57.9%. Sub-analysis in patients with concomitant irritant contact dermatitis showed no differences. Safety analysis showed no new findings compared to clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Upadacitinib can be an effective treatment for patients with AD and concomitant HE in daily practice. Future studies should focus on the effectiveness of upadacitinib on chronic HE, especially on the different etiological subtypes of HE, including HE in non-atopic individuals.

Quick Treatment of Very Severe Refractory Hand and Foot Eczema with Dupilumab: A Case Report and Literature Review

Previously case reports showed dupilumab may benefit for hand eczema treatment, but relatively comprehensive assessments are lacking. A 45-year-old male with multiple severe vesicles, bullae and pustule on the palmar aspects of both hand and foot diagnosed dyshidrotic eczema by pathology was treated with dupilumab at an initial dose of 600 mg subcutaneously, followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks. The physician's assessment of the patient revealed an excellent response to the treatment with dupilumab; the lesions and symptoms achieved dramatic improvement on the third day, and at 6 weeks, the hands and feet became completely normal without relapse in the past 1.5 years of discontinuation. Systematic literature searches were performed, and 6 case reports, 5 case series, 2 prospective observational studies and 1 retrospective review with a total of 150 patients were identified to describing the evaluation of efficacy and safety of dupilumab treatment for hand and foot eczema. Dupilumab appears to be safe and well tolerated with clinical benefit in recalcitrant hand and foot eczema. Larger randomized controlled trials using validated outcome measures and detailed hand eczema type and population classification are needed before dupilumab can be applied in clinical settings.

Boxed Warnings and Off-Label Use of Allergy Medications: Risks, Benefits, and Shared Decision Making

The Food and Drug Administration is tasked with evaluating the efficacy and safety of a drug. Despite having a regimented appraisal process in place, safety evidence can emerge during clinical trials as well as from observations and studies conducted after the drug has been on the market, which might require a boxed warning. The boxed warning is the most severe warning that the Food and Drug Administration can give to an approved drug. It is commonly referred to as a Black Box Warning because it is outlined in the package insert by a thick black box to garner the attention of prescribers and patients. There are currently more than 400 medications that have boxed warnings, and the information addressing major risks associated with a particular drug may, appropriately or inappropriately, influence patient and clinician decision making. Health care professionals must use the best evidence and clinical judgment in determining whether to prescribe medications with these warnings. Use of an approved drug at dosages or for indications other than what it was originally licensed for is referred to as "off-label" and is legal, commonplace, and may be evidence-based. All drugs may expose patients to possible harm, so prescribers have an obligation to discuss the best available evidence regarding benefits and harms so that patients can participate in shared decision making.

Contact Urticaria Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review

Purpose of Review

Contact urticaria syndrome includes contact urticaria and protein contact dermatitis. Underreport, underdiagnosis, or misdiagnosis of entities within the contact urticaria syndrome is believed to be common, especially in the occupational setting. This review provides a structured overview of the entities comprised in this syndrome as well as the diagnostic work-up and management strategies.

Recent Findings

Contact urticaria syndrome has been increasingly described due to personal protective equipment and hand sanitizers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of legal cannabis products has led to a rise in occupational cases of contact urticaria to cannabis. A declining trend in the evolution of contact urticaria has been described for natural rubber latex allergy due to the use of synthetic gloves. Prick test has been proposed as a screening method, particularly if multiple products are to be tested, instead of the classical sequential scheme.

Summary

Physicians should be aware of the growing number of culprit agents leading to contact urticaria syndrome. Clinical presentation may be challenging since it includes immediate urticaria and/or eczema and even more generalized reactions. Diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion, detailed occupational history, and complementary tests, including skin testing. The best treatment is to avoid contact with the culprit agent and to implement preventive measures.

Clinical phenotypes of adult atopic dermatitis and related therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To report current knowledge on the different clinical phenotypes of adult atopic dermatitis. Possible therapeutic intervention in relation to phenotype is also evaluated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting up to 10% of adults. It can manifest with different clinical phenotypes, causing diagnostic difficulties. Long-term is often required and systemic drugs are needed for moderate-to-severe forms. However, few drugs are registered for atopic dermatitis in many countries. Furthermore, limited data exist regarding the treatment in relation to individual clinical phenotypes.

SUMMARY

Currently, the most relevant data are those for cyclosporine, alitretinoin, and dupilumab. Cyclosporine and dupilumab showed to be effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, although in trials and real-life experiences the different phenotypes treated are usually not reported. However, cyclosporine appears to be effective in prurigo nodularis. Alitretinoin is reported to be particularly efficacious for atopic dermatitis of the hands, while it is ineffective for other locations of the disease. Dupilumab demonstrated its efficacy in prurigo nodularis and nummular eczema phenotypes of atopic dermatitis; moreover, especially in elderly patients, its effectiveness seems to be faster if the folds of the limbs are involved.

Current emerging and investigational drugs for the treatment of chronic hand eczema

INTRODUCTION

: Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a highly prevalent, burdensome condition associated with functional impairment. Currently, topical therapeutics are the mainstay of CHE management. However, many cases are refractory to existing topical therapeutics, and the few existing systemic options are often limited in efficacy and by their side effect profiles.

AREAS COVERED

: Following a brief overview of CHE pathogenesis and existing treatments, this review will outline the mechanisms and available data on emerging and investigational drugs currently being studied in clinical trials for the treatment of CHE.

EXPERT OPINION

: Immunomodulatory drugs such as topical and systemic JAK inhibitors and Th2-targeting antibodies such as dupilumab are currently under investigation for CHE treatment, with early promise. Management of CHE will likely move toward more targeted treatments through clinical trials and away from broad immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine and methotrexate, which have previously been investigated for CHE and have more side effects. In coming years, CHE patients may benefit from a wider range of both topical and systemic therapeutics that target immune pathways relevant to the various CHE subtypes.

[Modern systemic therapies for atopic dermatitis : Which factors determine the choice of therapy?]

For the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD), two groups of modern systemic therapies with a total of five drugs are currently approved in Germany: biologics (dupilumab, tralokinumab) and "small molecules" (abrocitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib). The growing armamentarium of therapy options, especially with more than one drug per substance group, makes it challenging for practitioners to select the appropriate treatment for the individual patient. In this review article, the preconditions and requirements of each drug group as well as the corresponding substances are presented comparatively. On the one hand, direct therapeutic effects on the severity of the disease are considered and, on the other hand, the spectrum of potential adverse drug reactions are discussed. In particular, short- and long-term effects, the safety profile and the patient's concomitant diseases represent key factors for shared decision-making with regard to select the optimum personalized therapy option.