Adenocarcinoma of the anal canal - a systematic review

Short- and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for inguinal lymph node metastasis in rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma

AIM

The significance of lymphadenectomy and its indications in patients with inguinal lymph node metastasis (ILNM) of anorectal adenocarcinoma is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of inguinal lymphadenectomy for ILNM.

METHOD

This study included patients who underwent surgical resection for ILNM of rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma with pathologically positive metastases between 1997 and 2011 at 20 participating centres in the Study Group for Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer organized by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 107 patients were included. The primary tumour was in the rectum in 57 patients (53.3%) and in the anal canal in 50 (46.7%). The median number of ILNMs was 2.34. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher were observed in five patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 38.8%. Multivariate analysis identified undifferentiated histological type (P < 0.001), pathological venous invasion (P = 0.01) and pathological primary tumour depth T0-2 (P = 0.01) as independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The 5-year overall survival after inguinal lymph node dissection was acceptable, and it warrants consideration in more patients. Further larger-scale studies are needed in order to clarify the surgical indications.

EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of an anal gland adenocarcinoma with submucosal rectal invasion after normal colonoscopy. An uncommon histology

We present the case of a 63-year-old male with long-term anal pain. A pelvic MRI was performed showing a tumor arising from the intersphincteric extending into the submucosal layer of the posterior rectal wall. The image was compatible with a cT4N0 ano-rectal carcinoma without any distant metastasis on the CT scan. Histopathology showed neoplastic proliferation cells arranged in nodules and nidus consistent with anal glands adenocarcinoma with a positive immunohistostaining for CK7 and MUC5+ .

Hybrid robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection supported by simultaneous trans-perineal approach for anal gland adenocarcinoma with vaginal invasion: a case report

Hybrid surgery (abdominal robotic approach with a trans-anal approach) has been reported to improve oncological outcomes in cases involving advanced cancer or technical difficulties. A 74-year-old woman presented with anal pain and stenosis. Examination revealed palpable sclerosis on the anterior wall at the anal verge with possible vaginal invasion. A biopsy revealed an adenocarcinoma. We performed a two-team robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection combined with resection of the vagina supported by a simultaneous trans-perineal approach. After rendezvous at the posterior side, the abdominal team cut the posterior wall of the vaginal vault while the perineal team confirmed the surgical margin. Histopathological findings identified the tumour as an anal gland adenocarcinoma (pT4b [vagina] N0M0 pathological stage IIC) with a negative circumferential resection margin. Hybrid surgery combined with resection of the posterior wall of the vagina may be performed safely and is a valuable surgical option for multimodal treatment of anal adenocarcinomas.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of anal adenocarcinoma: a nomogram development based on SEER database and validation in the WCH database

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to comprehensively understand anal canal adenocarcinomas (AA) and develop a nomogram for prognostic prediction of AA.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (the year 2004-2015). An external validation set was collected from West China Hospital (WCH) databases. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the demographic characteristic. A novel nomogram was developed to estimate individual survival probability and its performance was validated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analyses (DCA).

RESULTS

A total of 7901 patients were enrolled including 749 AA patients and 7152 squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal (ASCC) patients. Before PSM, patients with AA had shorter cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS than those with ASCC. However, after PSM, patients with AA were related to a favorable OS (p < 0.001), but a comparable CSS (p = 0.140) to those with ASCC. Age, sex, grade, surgery, and M stage were the independent prognostic factors of CSS for AA and were included in the establishment of a novel nomogram. Patients from the WCH database (n = 112) were used as an external validation cohort. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.78 and 0.735 in internal and external validation, respectively, which suggested the good discrimination power of the model. Furthermore, calibration curves and DCA suggested good agreement between the predicted and actual survival. Lastly, a risk classification system based on a nomogram revealed the reliability of the novel model.

CONCLUSION

AA and ASCC had distinct clinical features. AA was associated with a better prognosis than ASCC after PSM. The model of nomogram showed an accurate predictive ability for prognostic factors of AA patients.

Management and Outcomes in Anal Canal Adenocarcinomas—A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Anal canal adenocarcinomas are a rare type of bowel cancer. For this reason, it is challenging to perform large studies in order to determine the optimal treatment strategy to achieve the best outcomes. Options for treatment include radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery. These treatments may be combined or used alone. Outcomes are regarded as survival after diagnosis and treatment, or the recurrence of the disease. There is no universal gold standard that exists, with wide variability in practice and therefore also in outcomes between institutions. Thus, by reviewing the body of literature on the subject matter, the hope is to establish a management algorithm that may be tested and refined going forward. This is the intention of this systematic review.

Abstract

(1) Background: Anal canal adenocarcinomas constitute 1% of all gastrointestinal tract cancers. There is a current lack of consensus and NICE guidelines in the United Kingdom regarding the management of this disease. The overall objective was to perform a systematic review on the multitude of practice and subsequent outcomes in this group. (2) Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE and CINAHL databases were interrogated between 2011 to 2021. PRISMA guidelines were used to select relevant studies. The primary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival (OS). Secondary outcome measures included both local recurrences (LR) and distant metastases (DM). The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of studies retrieved. The study was registered on PROSPERO (338286). (3) Results: Fifteen studies were included. Overall, there were 11,967 participants who were demographically matched. There were 2090 subjects in the largest study and five subjects in the smallest study. Treatment modalities varied from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), CRT and surgery (CRT + S), surgery then CRT (S + CRT) and surgery only (S). Five-year OS ranged from 30.2% to 91% across the literature. LR rates ranged from 22% to 29%; DM ranged from 6% to 60%. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. (4) Conclusions: Trimodality treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by radical surgery of abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER) appeared to be the most effective approach, giving the best survival outcomes according to the current data.

Recurrence of sigmoid colon cancer–derived anal metastasis: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Distant metastasis of colorectal cancer to the anus is very rare, with only 30 related cases published in PubMed thus far. Therefore, recurrence of colorectal cancer derived anus metastases is rarely seen and less presented.

CASE SUMMARY

Here we report an 80-year-old male patient who underwent radical resection for sigmoid colon cancer in January 2010 and another surgery for anal fistula resection in December 2010. Postoperative pathology of the anal fistula revealed a metastatic moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient subsequently received chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In May 2020, after the patient reported symptoms of anal swelling and pain, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a perianal abscess. Perianal mass biopsy was performed, and the postoperative pathological diagnosis was metastatic moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights that there is a risk of recurrence of anal metastasis of colorectal cancer even after 10 years of follow-up. We also reviewed the literature and discuss potential mechanisms for anal metastasis of colorectal cancer, thus providing some suggestions for treatment of these cases.

Rectal Cancer Metastasis to the Anal Verge: An Unusual Case Presentation and Review of the Literature

Background

Anal metastasis of colorectal adenocarcinoma is very rare, represented by only a handful of case reports in the literature. Previously, reports of metastasis to this region had occurred following a history of anorectal disease, such as anal fistulae. Antecedent trauma to the area from hemorrhoidectomy, fissures, or perineal retractor injury have also been implicated.

Case Presentation

Herein we report the case of 69-year-old man without any history of anal disease presenting with a metachronous metastasis of a colorectal-type adenocarcinoma to the anal verge. He was previously treated for T1N0 rectal adenocarcinoma at the rectosigmoid junction with a low anterior resection 5 years prior, then had a T3N0 local recurrence at the colorectal anastomosis treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and eventually a Hartmann's procedure 4 years later. Subsequently, on surveillance flexible sigmoidoscopy, a new tumor was identified on the perianal skin extending from the anal verge. Histopathology demonstrated colorectal-type adenocarcinoma. Flexible endoscopy identified no other residual or recurrent disease in the colon or rectal stump. The patient was treated with wide local excision and advancement flap reconstruction.

Conclusion

Isolated metastasis to the anus is an extremely rare occurrence for colorectal adenocarcinoma. There exists little evidence to inform management. One option is to treat like a locally recurrent rectal cancer with aggressive tri-modality management consisting of chemoradiation, abdominal perineal resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy. In the absence of metastatic disease, local resection and close surveillance remain an option. As always, patient factors should guide management.

Anal adenocarcinoma: case report, literature review and comparative survival analysis

Introduction

Anal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis.

Methods

We present a case of rare anal adenocarcinoma in a patient with normal screening colonoscopy. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result database between 2000 and 2016, we performed survival analysis among individuals>20 years old comparing anal and rectal cancers.

Results

Survival analysis showed that anal adenocarcinoma is associated with worse outcomes compared with rectal adenocarcinoma and anal squamous cell carcinoma.

Discussion

This case and survival data illustrate the importance of prompt investigation of symptoms irrespective of colorectal cancer screening status with careful attention to examination of the anal area.

Adverse Oncologic Outcomes of Adenocarcinoma of the Anal Canal in Patients With Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Anal lesions in cases of Crohn's disease can give rise to adenocarcinoma of the anal canal; however, the oncologic outcomes in these patients have not yet been thoroughly investigated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to clarify the influence of Crohn's disease on the oncologic outcomes in patients with adenocarcinoma of the anal canal.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational study from a prospectively collected database.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a single institution.

PATIENTS

This study included 102 patients with adenocarcinoma of the anal canal, including 34 (33.3%) with Crohn's disease-associated lesions and 68 (66.7%) with non-Crohn's disease-associated lesions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prognostic factors were detected using a Cox regression analysis, and the oncologic outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Crohn's disease-associated patients were significantly younger (45 vs 62 y; p < 0.001), had a high incidence of external/anal gland-type disease (61.8% vs 5.9%, p < 0.001) and had large tumors (7.1 ± 3.0 vs 4.7 ± 2.3 cm; p = 0.03) in comparison with non-Crohn's disease-associated patients. A Cox regression analysis showed that an advanced clinical T stage (T3 or T4; tumor size ≥5 cm) was an independent risk factor for 5-year local recurrence-free survival (HR = 3.49; p = 0.04), disease-free survival (HR = 2.82; p = 0.008), and overall survival (HR = 2.92; p = 0.006), and Crohn's disease association was an independent prognostic factor for local recurrence-free survival (HR = 2.29; p = 0.04) and overall survival (HR = 2.86; p = 0.04). The oncologic outcomes of patients who had the 2 abovementioned negative factors (cT3,4 Crohn's disease-associated patients) were significantly poorer than those of T3,4 non-Crohn's disease-associated patients (5-year local recurrence-free survival: 32.5% vs 70.4%, p = 0.001; disease-free survival: 15.9% vs 40.7%, p = 0.04; overall survival: 25.8% vs 71.0%, p = 0.007).

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-arm, retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly poorer oncologic outcomes were confirmed in Crohn's disease-associated patients with large tumors. Thus, it is important to perform careful surveillance of anal lesions in patients with Crohn's disease while taking these facts into consideration. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B449.

RESULTADOS ONCOLGICOS ADVERSOS DEL ADENOCARCINOMA DEL CANAL ANAL EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN

ANTECEDENTES:Las lesiones anales en casos de enfermedad de Crohn pueden dar lugar a un adenocarcinoma del canal anal; sin embargo, los resultados oncológicos en estos pacientes aún no se han investigado a fondo.OBJETIVOS:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo aclarar la influencia de la enfermedad de Crohn en los resultados oncológicos en pacientes con adenocarcinoma del canal anal.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional retrospectivo de una base de datos recopilada prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se realizó en una sola institución.PACIENTES:Este estudio incluyó 102 pacientes con adenocarcinoma del canal anal, incluidos 34 (33,3%) con lesiones asociadas a la enfermedad de Crohn y 68 (66,7%) con lesiones no asociadas a la enfermedad de Crohn.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VOLARACION:Los factores pronósticos se detectaron mediante un análisis de regresión de Cox y los resultados oncológicos se calcularon utilizando el método de Kaplan-Meier.RESULTADOS:Los pacientes asociados a la enfermedad de Crohn eran significativamente más jóvenes (45 versus a 62 años, p <0,001), tenían una alta incidencia de enfermedad de tipo glandular externo/ anal (61,8% versus a 5,9%, p <0,001) y tumores grandes (7,1 ± 3,0 cm versus a 4,7 ± 2,3 cm, p = 0,03) en comparación con los pacientes no asociados a la enfermedad de Crohn. Un análisis de regresión de Cox mostró que un estadío clínico T avanzado (T3,4; tamaño del tumor ≥5 cm) era un factor de riesgo independiente para la supervivencia sin recidiva local (SLF) a 5 años (índice de riesgo [HR]: 3,49, p = 0,04), supervivencia libre de enfermedad (SSE) (HR: 2,82, p = 0,008) y supervivencia general (SG) (HR: 2,92, p = 0,006), y la enfermedad de Crohn asociada fue un factor pronóstico independiente para la SLF (HR: 2,29, p = 0,04) y SG (HR: 2,86, p = 0,04). Los resultados oncológicos de los pacientes que tenían los dos factores negativos mencionados anteriormente (pacientes asociados con la enfermedad de Crohn cT3,4) fueron significativamente peores que los de los pacientes no asociados con la enfermedad de Crohn con T3,4 (LFS a 5 años: 32,5% versus a 70,4 %, p = 0,001; SSE: 15,9% versus a 40,7%, p = 0,04; SG: 25,8% versus a 71,0%, p = 0,007).LIMITACIONES:Un estudio retrospectivo de un solo brazo.CONCLUSIONES:Se confirmaron resultados oncológicos significativamente peores en pacientes asociados con la enfermedad de Crohn con tumores grandes. Por lo tanto, es importante realizar una vigilancia cuidadosa de las lesiones anales en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B449.

Local excision and chemoradiation for clinical node-negative anal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Given the lack of consensus in the surgical treatment of anal adenocarcinoma, practice-patterns demonstrate utilization of organ-preserving techniques. The adequacy of local excision compared to abdominoperineal resection (APR) as a surgical approach for stage II disease is unknown. Our study examines the utilization of local excision in the treatment of stage II anal adenocarcinoma, rates of R0 resection, and differences in overall survival compared to APR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2016), we retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with clinical stage II anal adenocarcinoma who received chemoradiation and surgery. Patient cohorts were assigned based on the surgical procedure they received. Propensity score matching was used to offset selection bias and confounding factors. Treatment approach, pathologic margin status, and overall survival were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 359 patients underwent resection of clinical stage II anal adenocarcinoma and received chemoradiation therapy. Of these patients, 87 (24%) underwent local excision, whereas 272 (76%) received an abdominoperineal resection. In a propensity score-matched cohort, patients who underwent local excision were less likely to achieve an R0 resection (40% vs 90%), and more likely to receive adjuvant instead of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Overall survival was not significantly different between the propensity-matched groups. Surgical approach and pathologic margin status were not independently associated with overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with clinical stage II anal adenocarcinoma who received chemotherapy and radiation, complete resection was significantly less likely with local excision compared to abdominoperineal resection, however, overall survival was not affected. Prospective studies of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by local excision are warranted.

Cancer of the anal canal, a reality in the Colombian coffee region. Clinical-epidemiological review 2000-2019

INTRODUCTION

Anal cancer is a rare pathology which has increased over the last few decades, and, therefore, gained importance for the quality of life of affected individuals. Thus, a review has been conducted in the Colombian coffee region (Departments of Caldas, Quindío y Risaralda) describing its behaviour and clinical-epidemiological profile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Descriptive review of 437 patients of Western SAS Oncologists between January 2000 and December 2019 with a diagnosis of anal cancer.

RESULTS

62% of cases presented in women with a median age of 62 years, 30% in the sixth decade; centred at 65% in three main cities designated as capitals (Manizales, Pereira and Armenia); 62% as localised disease, with 40% stage II-A and 6% as initial metastasis; 29% presented positive ganglia, particularly N1a; squamous cell or epidermoid histology in 90%; 16% poorly differentiated; 5% related to Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection; localisation in the medial area of the anal canal in 63% of cases; 83% completed treatment, and 92% of them received chemotherapy/radiation therapy with 87% based on the Nigro protocol; finally, 11% presented with relapse in the liver in 10% of cases and 55% local.

CONCLUSION

Four hundred and thirty-seven patients evaluated over 20 years with follow up at median 34.13 months (standard deviation 41.75) with median survival at later ages decreasing to 62% in patients older than 80 years, and differences in survival in localised disease at 78% in comparison to 46% in advanced metastasis. Finally, the overall 5-year survival rate is 69% with a median survival of 191 months in the study.

Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome of Adenocarcinoma of the Anal Canal: A Population-Based Study

Background

Anal canal adenocarcinoma (AA) is an uncommon tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. We seek to provide a detailed description of the incidence, demographics, and outcome of this rare tumor in the United States.

Methods

The data on anal canal adenocarcinoma from SEER Program, between 1973–2015, were extracted. We analyzed the incidence rates by demographics and tumor characteristics, followed by analysis of its impact on survival.

Results

The incidence of AA increased initially by 4.03% yearly from 1973 to 1985 but had a modest decline of 0.32% annually thereafter. The mean age for diagnosis of AA was 68.12 ± 14.02 years. Males outnumbered females by 54.8 to 45.2%. Tumors were mostly localized on presentation (44.4%) and moderately differentiated (41.1%). Age generally correlated with poor overall cancer survival. However, young patients (age <40 years) also showed poor long-term survival. Patients with localized disease and well-differentiated tumors showed better survival outcomes. Surgical intervention improved survival significantly as compared to patients who did not (116.7 months vs 42.7 months, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Anal canal adenocarcinoma demonstrated a poor bimodal cancer-free survival in both younger and older patient groups. Surgery significantly improves odds of survival and should be offered to patients amenable to intervention.

Survival Outcomes After Initial Treatment for Anal Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Anal adenocarcinoma (AA) is reported to represent 5% to 10% of all anal cancer. Currently there is no evidence-based treatment of AA. We investigated clinical outcomes after treatment regimens in patients with AA and used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to examine the outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched for patients diagnosed with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the anal canal with stage I to III disease between 2010 and 2016 using SEER∗Stat software.

RESULTS

A total of 393 patients treated from 2010 to 2016 for AA were identified. Patients were divided into 5 groups according to treatment: 68 patients (17.3%) receiving radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CTx), 16 patients (4.1%) receiving RT or CTx, 108 patients (27.5%) receiving surgery alone, 137 patients (34.8%) receiving preoperative RT or CTx with surgery, and 64 patients (16.3%) receiving postoperative RT or CTx with surgery. The 3-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rates were 63.9% in the RT and CTx group, 35.7% in the RT or CTx group, 77.7% in the surgery-alone group, 80.3% in the preoperative RT or CTx group, and 65.8% in the postoperative group (P < .001). Preoperative RT or CTx was associated with improved CSS on multivariate analysis (P = .024). The 3-year CSS rates for those who received surgery and those who did not receive surgery were 81.5% and 87.5% for stage I disease, and 74.4% and 57.3% for stage II/III disease.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative treatment with surgical resection may maximize the survival outcome. Although chemoradiotherapy alone may be sufficient for early stages of disease, patients with advanced disease should be treated with a combination of surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy. Future studies are required to determine the appropriate treatment strategies in AA.

Anal Cancer

Anal cancer is a rare cancer, comprising less than 5% of gastrointestinal tract malignancies. Diagnosis of anal canal cancer can be difficult given that presenting symptoms are similar to those of benign anorectal diseases. General surgeons who encounter suspected anal canal cancer need to have a good understanding of the anatomy of the anal canal, high index of suspicion for malignancy, and low threshold to biopsy lesions when indicated. This article discusses the most commonly encountered anal canal tumors, the evaluation of these tumors, and their management. The foundation for successful therapy includes timely diagnosis, accurate staging, and routine surveillance.

Patterns of Care and Comparison of Outcomes Between Primary Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Anal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The management of adenocarcinoma of the anus can be challenging because there are few data on outcomes and trends in its treatment to date.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare and analyze the patterns of care and survival outcomes of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma and anal adenocarcinoma.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

SETTING

This study was performed by utilizing the National Cancer Database.

PATIENTS

We selected a total of 19,539 patients between 2004 and 2014 with stage II to III squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the anus.

INTERVENTION

The treatment groups analyzed were surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation, or definitive chemoradiation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient- and clinical-related factors were compared between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the patients studied, 18,346 (93.9%) had primary squamous cell carcinoma and 1193 (6.1%) had primary adenocarcinoma of the anus. The 5-year overall survival for stage II squamous cell carcinoma was 69.2%, and, for stage II adenocarcinoma, 5-year overall survival was 54.2% (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival for stage III squamous cell carcinoma was 55.2%, and, for stage III adenocarcinoma, 5-year overall survival was 32.9% (p < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression, treatment with chemoradiation alone (HR, 0.67; p = 0.008) was associated with improved survival in squamous cell carcinoma. For the adenocarcinoma group, stage III disease (HR, 2.26; p < 0.001) and high tumor grade (HR, 1.59; p < 0.011) had a negative impact on survival, but there were no differences in survival based on the type of treatment received.

LIMITATIONS

The National Cancer Database does not include information on specific chemotherapeutic or immunotherapy agents given to patients, nor does it provide the exact cause of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal adenocarcinoma in comparison to anal squamous cell carcinoma had a lower 5-year overall survival stage for stage. Anal adenocarcinoma appears to be treated similarly to the rectal cancer paradigm, with frequent use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B50. PATRONES DE EL CUIDADO Y COMPARACIÓN DE RESULTADOS ENTRE EL CARCINOMA DE CÉLULAS ESCAMOSAS ANAL PRIMARIO Y EL ADENOCARCINOMA ANAL: El tratamiento del adenocarcinoma del ano puede ser un desafío ya que hasta la fecha, hay pocos datos sobre los resultados y las tendencias en su tratamiento.Comparar y analizar los patrones de el cuidado y resultados de supervivencia de pacientes con carcinoma anal de células escamosas y adenocarcinoma anal.Este fue un estudio retrospectivo.Este estudio se realizó utilizando la Base de Datos Nacional de Cancer (National Cancer Database, NCB).Seleccionamos un total de 19,539 pacientes entre el 2004-2014 con carcinoma de células escamosas en estadio II-III o adenocarcinoma del ano.Los grupos de tratamiento analizados fueron solo cirugía, quimiorradiación neoadyuvante seguida por cirugía, cirugía seguida por quimiorradiación adyuvante o quimiorradiación definitiva.Se compararon los factores clínicos y de pacientes entre los dos grupos. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión de riesgos proporcionales de Kaplan-Meier y Cox para evaluar la supervivencia general.18,346 (93.9%) tenían carcinoma primario de células escamosas y 1,193 (6.1%) tenían adenocarcinoma primario del ano. La supervivencia global a 5 años para el carcinoma de células escamosas en estadio II fue del 69.2% y para el adenocarcinoma en estadio II fue del 54.2% (p < 0.001). La supervivencia global a cinco años para el carcinoma de células escamosas en estadio III fue del 55.2% y para el adenocarcinoma en estadio III fue del 32.9% (p < 0.001). En la regresión de Cox multivariable, el tratamiento con quimiorradiación sola (proporción de riesgo 0.67, p = 0.008) se asoció con una mejor supervivencia en el carcinoma de células escamosas. Para el grupo de adenocarcinoma, la enfermedad en estadio III (proporción de riesgo 2.26, p < 0.001) y el alto grado tumoral (proporción de riesgo 1.59, p < 0.011) tuvieron un impacto negativo en la supervivencia, pero no hubo diferencias en la supervivencia según el tipo de tratamiento recibido.La Base de Datos Nacional de Cancer no incluye información sobre agentes quimioterapéuticos o de inmunoterapia específicos que se administran a los pacientes, ni proporciona la causa exacta de la muerte.El adenocarcinoma anal en comparación con el carcinoma anal de células escamosas tuvo una supervivencia general inferior a 5 años, etapa por etapa. El adenocarcinoma anal parece tratarse de manera similar al paradigma del cáncer rectal, con el uso frecuente de quimiorradiación neoadyuvante. Vea el video del resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B50.

What factors are associated with the poor prognosis of anal adenocarcinoma compared with low-lying rectal adenocarcinoma based on a population analysis: A propensity score matching study

PURPOSE

Anal adenocarcinoma (AA) represents a rare condition, and little is known about the predictive factors of the outcomes or the optimal TNM staging system for curable AA. Using population-based data, we preliminarily sought to determine the prognostic factors and evaluate the existing T and N staging criteria of AA.

METHODS

We analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database to identify patients 20-80 years old who were diagnosed with AA or rectal adenocarcinoma (RA) and underwent abdominal perineal resection between 2004 and 2012. The difference between Kaplan-Meier survival curves was estimated by a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to adjust the effects of other covariates on survival in the propensity score-matched cohort, including age, gender, race, marital status, histology, grade of differentiation, tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Compared to patients with RA, patients with AA had a worse CSS after controlling for other covariates (hazard ratio [HR], 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-3.07; P<0.01). For AA, the increasing tumor size (2-5 cm: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.29-1.32; P>0.05; >5 cm: HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.49-2.07; P>0.05) had no significant influence on survival. The number of positive lymph nodes (1-3: HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.55-5.53; P<0.01; ≥4: HR, 4.24; 95% CI, 2.08-8.62; P<0.01) significantly influenced survival.

CONCLUSIONS

AA confers a worse prognosis than RA does. The T staging criteria of anal carcinoma, dominated by tumor size, seem to be invalid for AA, while the number of positive lymph nodes is a prognostic factor.

Rescue surgery for advanced anal gland adenocarcinoma: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Extramucosal anal canal adenocarcinomas can arise in anorectal fistulas and the anal glands, the latter being rare. We present a rare case of anal gland adenocarcinoma treated with a combination of neoadjuvant therapy and radical surgical resection.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 56-year-old man presented with rectal bleeding and irritation, and a nodule that had been enlarging for 10 months. Rectal examination revealed a bleeding ulceroproliferative growth at the left lateral edge of the anus without apparent invasion of the anal mucosa. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of anal canal adenocarcinoma CK7+,CDX2-, and focalCK20+). Endoanal ultrasound showed a lesion involving the anal canal, extending into the transition zone with the lower rectum, invading the external anal sphincter, with no cleavage plane with the urethra, measuring 89 × 33 × 57 mm, associated with lymphadenopathy in the lower mesorectum (uT4N1). PET/CT confirmed a hypermetabolic lesion on the anal edge and bilateral hypermetabolic inguinal lymph nodes suggestive of secondary involvement. Colonoscopy was normal. The patient was started on neoadjuvant therapy with oral capecitabine and radiotherapy (57.6 Gy). Twelve weeks, the patient underwent extralevator abdominoperineal excision, cystoscopy (free urethral mucosa), skeletonization of the urethra with partial resection of the corpus cavernosum, and pelvic floor reconstruction with a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.

DISCUSSION

Treatment of anal gland adenocarcinoma remains to be established. A combination of radical surgical resection and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been suggested, as performed here.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced anal gland adenocarcinoma may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy followed by rescue surgery.

A CARE-compliant article: a case report of primary adenocarcinoma of the anal glands: Review of literature

RATIONALE

Adenocarcinoma of the anal canal is an uncommon malignancy. Primary adenocarcinoma, in particular, is extremely rare.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 61-year-old man was referred to our institution with complaints of repeated hematochezia.

DIAGNOSIS

Digital rectal examination revealed a hard palpable ulcer in the anal canal, measuring 2 cm × 2 cm in size, at the 5 o'clock direction (in the lithotomy position). The pelvic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed anal verge occupying mass. A diagnosis of carcinoma of the anal canal was considered. Colonoscopic examination revealed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the anal canal.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) of the rectum, and was administered 6 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX.

OUTCOMES

The patient was followed up for more than 1 year after operation, and no local recurrence or distant metastasis occurred.

LESSONS

The diagnosis and treatment of this disease is still a huge challenge because its incidence is very low. A study of more cases is required for uniformity in diagnosis and for the development of treatment protocols.

Adenocarcinoma of the anal canal with an exceptional immunohistochemistry in a patient with serrated polyposis syndrome: a diagnostic challenge

Anal adenocarcinomas account for approximately 10% of all anorectal tumours. We present the case of an adenocarcinoma of the proximal anal canal with exceptional immunohistochemistry as an incidental finding after haemorrhoidectomy, in a patient with endoscopically controlled serrated polyposis syndrome. Histopathological analysis of the specimen was a challenge in terms of differential diagnosis, which often determines the choice of therapeutic approach.

An Exceptional Adenocarcinoma in a Girl

Anal adenocarcinoma is very rare and usually occurs in the elderly. We present a case of a 12-year-old girl with an anal margin painful tumor infiltrating the lower rectum, with perineal and vulvar permeation nodules and bilateral fixed inguinal and iliac lymph nodes. Histology showed anal adenocarcinoma with mucosecreting component and independent cells. She had no extra pelvic metastasis on CT scan. She underwent a colostomy and palliative care. This exceptional case challenges us on the diversity of forms of anal cancers that require a multidisciplinary approach. The precarious social context and the age of onset make it difficult to manage this rare cancer.

Assessment of the external validity of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for anal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study evaluates the prognostic value of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for patients with anal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2014) was explored and AJCC 6th and 8th stages were formulated. Through Kaplan-Meier analysis, overall survival analyses were performed. The Cox regression model (adjusted for age, gender, histology, ethnicity, subsite and grade) was calculated for cancer-specific survival and, subsequently, pairwise comparisons of hazard ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 11,934 anal carcinoma patients were included in the analysis. Overall survival was compared according to both AJCC 6th and 8th systems. For both staging systems, the p value for the trend in overall survival was significant (p < .0001). Nevertheless, for the AJCC 6th system, stage IIIA and IIIB curves were overlapping; while for the AJCC 8th system, the median survival for stage IIB was lower than the mean survival for stage IIIA (74 months vs. 96 months). Moreover, stage IIIB and stage IIIC curves were overlapping. The cause-specific (cancer-specific) Cox regression hazard was calculated for both staging systems. Pairwise hazard ratio comparisons between different AJCC 6th stages were performed and all p values for comparisons were significant (p < .05). Pairwise hazard ratio comparisons between different AJCC 8th stages were performed and only the following comparisons were significant (p < .0001) (I vs. IIA; IIA vs. IIB; IIIC vs. IV). The C-statistic (using death from anal carcinoma as the dependent variable) for the AJCC 6th staging system was: 0.681 (SE: 0.009; 95% CI: 0.664-0.698); while the C-statistic for the AJCC 8th staging system was 0.687 (SE: 0.008; 95% CI: 0.670-0.703).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of significant improvement in the AJCC 8th edition compared to AJCC 6th (or 7th) edition in terms of overall or cancer-specific survival prediction.

A dualistic model of primary anal canal adenocarcinoma with distinct cellular origins, etiologies, inflammatory microenvironments and mutational signatures: implications for personalised medicine

Background

Primary adenocarcinoma of the anal canal is a rare and aggressive gastrointestinal disease with unclear pathogenesis. Because of its rarity, no clear clinical practice guideline has been defined and a targeted therapeutic armamentarium has yet to be developed. The present article aimed at addressing this information gap by in-depth characterising the anal glandular neoplasms at the histologic, immunologic, genomic and epidemiologic levels.

Methods

In this multi-institutional study, we first examined the histological features displayed by each collected tumour (n = 74) and analysed their etiological relationship with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The intratumoural immune cell subsets (CD4, CD8, Foxp3), the expression of immune checkpoints (PD-1, PD-L1), the defect in mismatch repair proteins and the mutation analysis of multiple clinically relevant genes in the gastrointestinal cancer setting were also determined. Finally, the prognostic significance of each clinicopathological variable was assessed.

Results

Phenotypic analysis revealed two region-specific subtypes of anal canal adenocarcinoma. The significant differences in the HPV status, density of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, expression of immune checkpoints and mutational profile of several targetable genes further supported the separation of these latter neoplasms into two distinct entities. Importantly, anal gland/transitional-type cancers, which poorly respond to standard treatments, displayed less mutations in downstream effectors of the EGFR signalling pathway (i.e., KRAS and NRAS) and demonstrated a significantly higher expression of the immune inhibitory ligand-receptor pair PD-1/PD-L1 compared to their counterparts arising from the colorectal mucosa.

Conclusions

Taken together, the findings reported in the present article reveal, for the first time, that glandular neoplasms of the anal canal arise by HPV-dependent or independent pathways. These etiological differences leads to both individual immune profiles and mutational landscapes that can be targeted for therapeutic benefits.

Anal Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Classification Proposal, Epidemiology, Carcinogenesis, and Risk Management Perspectives

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] may develop, similarly to individuals from general population, rare cases of human papilloma virus [HPV]-related anal canal squamous cell carcinoma [SCC] and intra-epithelial precursor lesions, as well as very rare cases of anal canal adenocarcinoma. Patients with chronic perianal Crohn's disease [CD] are at substantial risk of developing SCC or adenocarcinoma from the fistula-lining epithelium, as well as SCC or adenocarcinoma arising from chronic anorectal ulcerations or strictures. Based on this lesion stratification, we provide in this review tailored incidence estimates and we propose an IBD-specific classification of all types of anal neoplasia that may occur in patients with IBD. After reviewing putative carcinogenesis of all types of neoplasia, we conclude that HPV vaccination could reduce the incidence of HPV-related lesions, although an anal screening programme related to these lesions is not mandatory on the sole basis of IBD. By contrast, we point out that all patients with chronic perianal CD should be explored in depth, including biopsies under anaesthesia and fistula curettage when necessary, in case of any change in anal symptoms ─in particular new, increasing, unexplained pain. Finally, we conclude that there is an urgent need for elaborating and evaluating surveillance algorithms in patients with chronic perianal CD, in order to avoid cancers with late diagnosis and poor prognosis.

International trends in anal cancer incidence rates

Background

Previous studies have reported rapid increases in anal cancer incidence rates in seven high-income countries in North America, Europe and Oceania. There is very limited information on whether this pattern is replicated in other parts of the world. In this study, we examine recent trends in anal cancer incidence in 18 countries worldwide.

Methods

We calculated age-standardized incidence rates for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) and anal adenocarcinoma (AAC) for a minimum of 13 years through to 2007, using data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer's Cancer Incidence in Five Continents series, and applied joinpoint regression models to assess changes in incidence rates. We also conducted an extended analysis of the data from the USA through to 2012.

Results

ASCC was the main histological subtype in most of the countries considered in this analysis. The incidence of ASCC increased in both men and women in several high-income countries, including Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Italy, Netherlands, the UK and the USA, whereas it increased only in women in Colombia, Estonia, the Russian Federation, Slovakia and Switzerland. Conversely, there was little change in the incidence of ASCC in either men or women in India, Israel, Japan, Singapore and Spain. The incidence rates of AAC decreased or were stable in most populations.

Conclusions

The ASCC incidence rates increased in both men and women or in women in all countries included in this study, except Asian countries and Spain, where the rates remained unchanged. Population-based preventive measures, including human papillomavirus vaccination and advocacy for safe sexual behaviours, may contribute to curbing the surging burden of the disease.

Anal metastasis from rectal adenocarcinoma

The metastasis of rectal cancer to the anus is rare. Here, we report a case of advanced rectal cancer, which had a diffuse venous invasion with anal metastasis and multiple lymph node and liver metastases. The patient was a 72-year-old woman who complained of perianal pain and fresh blood in the stools for 6 months. She had neither history of fistula-in-ano nor anal surgery. Digital examination revealed a 2-cm tumor at the 7 o'clock position, and the barium enema and colonoscopy confirmed advanced rectal cancer. Abdominal computed tomography revealed thickness of the upper rectum wall, right inguinal lymph node of 10 mm and multiple liver metastases. Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection, anal tumor resection, and right inguinal lymph node resection were performed, and the histopathological examination of the resected primary and metastatic tumors confirmed similar findings of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, suggestive of metastasis of the rectal cancer to the anal region. In the next procedure, she had the liver lesions resected. This case suggested the importance of the careful examination of the anus during colonoscopy, or digital examination for the detection of anal metastasis.

Case report of an anal adenocarcinoma arising from a perineal lump

Anal adenocarcinoma is a rare condition and can arise in chronic inflammatory states such as in Crohn's disease, or in a chronic fistula-in-ano. We report our diagnosis and management of a patient who presented with a large perineal lump with a long-standing history of perianal fistulous disease. This was initially evaluated with a Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and the diagnosis was confirmed with biopsy. Multimodality treatment with chemoradiotherapy and surgery should be offered to achieve the best outcomes.

Metachronous tubulovillous and tubular adenomas of the anal canal

Anal canal adenoma is an extremely rare disease that has the potential to transform into a malignant tumor. We herein presented a rare case of metachronous multiple adenomas of the anal canal. A 48-year-old woman underwent total colonoscopy following a positive fecal blood test. A 9-mm villous polyp arising from the posterior wall of the anal canal was removed by snare polypectomy. Histologically, the tumor was tubulovillous adenoma with high-grade dysplasia and the cut end was negative for tumor cells. Six years later, an elevated lesion, macroscopically five millimeters in size, was detected in the left wall of the anal canal in a follow-up colonoscopy. Local excision of the tumor was performed, and the lesion was pathologically confirmed to be tubular adenoma with high-grade dysplasia limited to the mucosa. The patient is currently alive without any evidence of recurrence for six months after surgery. Although she had a past history of cervical cancer, the multiple tumors arising in the anal canal were unlikely to be related to human papilloma virus infection. Our case report underscores the importance of careful observations throughout colonoscopy to detect precancerous lesions, particularly in anatomically narrow segments.

Anal Cancer Incidence in the United States, 1977-2011: Distinct Patterns by Histology and Behavior

BACKGROUND

Although anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) are generally combined in cancer surveillance, their etiologies likely differ. Here, we describe demographic characteristics and trends in incidence rates (IR) of anal cancer by histology (SCC, ADC) and behavior (invasive, in situ) in the United States.

METHODS

With data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, we estimated age-adjusted anal cancer IRs across behavior/histology by demographic and tumor characteristics for 2000-2011. Trends in IRs and annual percent changes during 1977-2011 were also estimated and compared with rectal cancer.

RESULTS

Women had higher rates of SCC [rate ratio (RR), 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-1.50] and lower rates of ADC (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.62-0.74) and squamous carcinoma in situ (CIS; RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.34-0.38) than men. Blacks had lower rates of SCC (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.87) and CIS (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98) than non-Hispanic whites, but higher rates of ADC (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.29-1.70). Anal cancer IRs were higher in men and blacks aged <40 years. During 1992-2011, SCC IRs increased 2.9%/year, ADC IRs declined nonsignificantly, and CIS IRs increased 14.2%/year. SCC and ADC IR patterns and trends were similar across anal and rectal cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of anal SCC and CIS have increased strongly over time, in contrast to rates of anal ADC, similar to trends observed for rectal SCC and ADC.

IMPACT

Anal SCC and ADC likely have different etiologies, but may have similar etiologies to rectal SCC and ADC, respectively. Strong increases in CIS IRs over time may reflect anal cancer screening patterns.