1
|
Granger SP, Preece RAD, Thomas MG, Dixon SW, Chambers AC, Messenger DE. Colorectal cancer incidence trends by tumour location among adults of screening-age in England: a population-based study. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:1771-1782. [PMID: 37553121 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
AIM Proximal and distal colorectal cancers (CRCs) exhibit different clinical, molecular and biological patterns. The aim of this study was to determine temporal trends in the age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) of proximal and distal CRC following the introduction of the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in 2006. METHOD The National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database was used to identify incident cases of CRC among adults of screening age (60-74 years) between 2001 and 2017. ASIRs were calculated using the European Standard Population 2013 and incidence trends analysed by anatomical subsite (proximal, caecum to descending colon; distal, sigmoid to rectum), sex and Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintile using Joinpoint regression software. RESULTS Between 2001 and 2017, 541 515 incident cases of CRC were diagnosed [236 167 proximal (43.6%) and 305 348 distal (56.4%)]. A marginal reduction in the proximal ASIR was noted from 2008 [annual percentage change (APC) -1.4% (95% CI -2.0% to -0.9%)] compared with a greater reduction in distal ASIR from 2011 to 2014 [APC -6.6% (95% CI -11.5% to -1.5%)] which plateaued thereafter [APC -0.5% (95% CI -3.2% to 2.2%)]. Incidence rates decreased more rapidly in men than women. Adults in IMD quintiles 4-5 experienced the greatest reduction in distal tumours [APC -3.5% (95% CI -4.3% to -2.7%)]. CONCLUSION Following the introduction of the English BCSP, the incidence of CRC has subsequently reduced among adults of screening age, with this trend being most pronounced in distal tumours and in men. There is also evidence of a reduction in the deprivation gap for distal tumour incidence. Strategies to improve the detection of proximal tumours are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam P Granger
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
| | - Ryan A D Preece
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael G Thomas
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
| | - Steven W Dixon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
| | - Adam C Chambers
- School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - David E Messenger
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Delon C, Brown KF, Payne NWS, Kotrotsios Y, Vernon S, Shelton J. Differences in cancer incidence by broad ethnic group in England, 2013-2017. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1765-1773. [PMID: 35233092 PMCID: PMC9174248 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01718-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer incidence variation between population groups can inform public health and cancer services. Previous studies have shown cancer incidence rates vary by ethnic group in England. Since their publication, the completeness of ethnicity recording in cancer data has improved, and relevant inequalities (e.g. risk factor prevalence and healthcare access) may have changed. METHODS Age-standardised incidence rates were calculated for Asian, Black, Mixed/Multiple and White ethnic groups in England in 2013-2017, using almost 3 million diagnoses across 31 cancer sites. Rate ratios were calculated with the White ethnic group as reference. Sensitivity analyses used imputed ethnicity for cases with missing data and perturbed population estimates. RESULTS Incidence rates for most cancer sites and ethnic group and sex combinations were lower in non-White minority ethnic groups compared with the corresponding White group, with particularly low rate ratios (below 0.5) for melanoma skin cancer and some smoking-related cancers (lung, bladder and oesophageal cancers). Exceptions included prostate cancer (2.1 times higher in males of Black ethnicity), myeloma (2.7-3.0 times higher in people of Black ethnicity), several gastrointestinal cancers (1.1-1.9 times higher in people of Black ethnicity, 1.4-2.2 times higher in people of Asian ethnicity), Hodgkin lymphoma (1.1 times higher in males of Asian ethnicity, 1.3 times higher in males of Black ethnicity) and thyroid cancers (1.4 times higher in people of Asian ethnicity, 1.2 times higher in people of Black ethnicity). Sensitivity analyses did not materially alter these results (rate ratios changed by a maximum of 12 percentage points, the direction and significance of results were unchanged in all but two cancer site/sex/ethnic group combinations). CONCLUSIONS People of non-White minority ethnicity in England generally have lower cancer risk than the White population, though there are a number of notable exceptions. These results should galvanise efforts to better understand the reasons for this variation, and the possible impact on cancer services, patient experiences and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Delon
- Cancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK.
| | - Katrina F Brown
- Cancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK
| | - Nick W S Payne
- Cancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK
| | - Yannis Kotrotsios
- Cancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK
| | - Sally Vernon
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS Digital, 7 and 8 Wellington Place, Leeds, LS1 4AP, UK
| | - Jon Shelton
- Cancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lipsyc-Sharf M, Zhang S, Ou FS, Ma C, McCleary NJ, Niedzwiecki D, Chang IW, Lenz HJ, Blanke CD, Piawah S, Van Loon K, Bainter TM, Venook AP, Mayer RJ, Fuchs CS, Innocenti F, Nixon AB, Goldberg R, O’Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K. Survival in Young-Onset Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Findings From Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:427-435. [PMID: 34636852 PMCID: PMC8902338 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer (yoCRC) is increasing. It is unknown if there are survival differences between young and older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS We studied the association of age with survival in 2326 mCRC patients enrolled in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B and SWOG 80405 trial, a multicenter, randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy plus biologics. The primary and secondary outcomes of this study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively, which were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared among younger vs older patients with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on Cox proportional hazards modeling, adjusting for known prognostic variables. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Of 2326 eligible subjects, 514 (22.1%) were younger than age 50 years at study entry (yoCRC cohort). The median age of yoCRC patients was 44.3 vs 62.5 years in patients aged 50 years and older. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between yoCRC vs older-onset patients (median = 27.07 vs 26.12 months; adjusted HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.10; P = .78). The median PFS was also similar in yoCRC vs older patients (10.87 vs 10.55 months) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% CI = 0.92 to 1.13; P = .67). Patients younger than age 35 years had the shortest OS with median OS of 21.95 vs 26.12 months in older-onset patients with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% CI = 0.81 to 1.44; Ptrend = .93). CONCLUSION In this large study of mCRC patients, there were no statistically significant differences in survival between patients with yoCRC and CRC patients aged 50 years and older.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla Lipsyc-Sharf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chao Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - I-Wen Chang
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair’s Office/Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sorbarikor Piawah
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany M Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Eileen M O’Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|