Immune function assay (ImmuKnow) as a predictor of allograft rejection and infection in kidney transplantation

Prediction of peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations after renal transplantation

Immune monitoring is essential for maintaining immune homeostasis after renal transplantation (RT). Peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations (PBLSs) are widely used biomarkers for immune monitoring, yet there is no established standard reference for PBLSs during immune reconstitution post-RT. PBLS data from stable recipients at various time points post-RT were collected. Binary and multiple linear regressions, along with a mixed-effect linear model, were used to analyze the correlations between PBLSs and clinical parameters. Predictive models for PBLS reference values were developed using Gradient Boosting Regressor, and the models' performance was also evaluated in infected recipients. A total of 1,736 tests from 494 stable recipients and 98 tests from 82 infected recipients were included. Age, transplant time, induction therapy, dialysis duration, serum creatinine, albumin, hemoglobin, and immunosuppressant drug concentration were identified as major factors influencing PBLSs. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and NK cells increased rapidly, stabilizing within three months post-RT. In contrast, B cells peaked at around two weeks and gradually plateaued after four months. Both static and dynamic predictive models provided accurate reference values for PBLSs at any time post-RT, with the static model showing superior performance in distinguishing stable, infected and sepsis patients. Key factors influencing PBLS reconstitution after RT were identified. The predictive models accurately reflected PBLS reconstitution patterns and provided practical, personalized reference values for PBLSs, contributing to precision-guided care. The study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300068666).

Biomarkers in Kidney Transplantation: A Rapidly Evolving Landscape

The last decade has seen an explosion in clinical research focusing on the use of noninvasive biomarkers in kidney transplantation. Much of the published literature focuses on donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). Although initially studied as a noninvasive means of identifying acute rejection, it is now clear that dd-cfDNA is more appropriately described as a marker of severe injury and irrespective of the etiology, elevated dd-cfDNA ≥0.5% portends worse graft outcomes. Blood gene expression profiling is also commercially available and has mostly been studied in the context of early identification of subclinical rejection, although additional data is needed to validate these findings. Torque teno virus, a ubiquitous DNA virus, has emerged as a biomarker of immunosuppression exposure as peripheral blood Torque teno virus copy numbers might mirror the intensity of host immunosuppression. Urinary chemokine tests including C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 have recently been assessed in large clinical trials and hold promising potential for early diagnosis of both subclinical and acute rejection, as well as, for long-term prognosis. Urinary cellular messenger RNA and exosome vesicular RNA based studies require additional validation. Although current data does not lend itself to conclusion, future studies on multimodality testing may reveal the utility of serial surveillance for individualization of immunosuppression and identify windows of opportunity to intervene early and before the irreversible allograft injury sets in.

Detection of Subclinical Rejection in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: Current and Future Practices

INTRODUCTION

The successes in the field of pediatric kidney transplantation over the past 60 years have been extraordinary. Year over year, there have been significant improvements in short-term graft survival. However, improvements in longer-term outcomes have been much less apparent. One important contributor has been the phenomenon of low-level rejection in the absence of clinical manifestations-so-called subclinical rejection (SCR).

METHODS

Traditionally, rejection has been diagnosed by changes in clinical parameters, including but not limited to serum creatinine and proteinuria. This review examines the shortcomings of this approach, the effects of SCR on kidney allograft outcome, the benefits and drawbacks of surveillance biopsies to identify SCR, and new urine and blood biomarkers that define the presence or absence of SCR.

RESULTS

Serum creatinine is an unreliable index of SCR. Surveillance biopsies are the method most utilized to detect SCR. However, these have significant drawbacks. New biomarkers show promise. These biomarkers include blood gene expression profiles and donor derived-cell free DNA; urine gene expression profiles; urinary cytokines, chemokines, and metabolomics; and other promising blood and urine tests.

CONCLUSION

Specific emphasis is placed on studies carried out in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03719339.

Biomarkers in Kidney Transplantation

Currently in the United States, there are more than 250,000 patients with a functioning kidney allograft and over 100,000 waitlisted patients awaiting kidney transplant, with a burgeoning number added to the kidney transplant wait list every year. Although early post-transplant care is delivered at the transplant center, the increasing number of kidney transplant recipients requires general nephrologists to actively participate in the long-term care of these patients. Serum creatinine and proteinuria are imperfect traditional biomarkers of allograft dysfunction and lag behind subclinical allograft injury. This manuscript reviews the various clinically available biomarkers in the field of kidney transplantation for a general nephrologist with a focus on the utility of donor-derived cell-free DNA, as a marker of early allograft injury. Blood gene expression profiling, initially studied in the context of early identification of subclinical rejection, awaits validation in larger multicentric trials. Urinary cellular messenger ribonucleic acid and chemokine CXCL10 hold promising potential for early diagnosis of both subclinical and acute rejection. Torque tenovirus, a ubiquitous DNA virus is emerging as a biomarker of immunosuppression exposure as peripheral blood torque tenovirus copy numbers might mirror the intensity of host immunosuppression. Although high-quality evidence is still being generated, evidence and recommendations are provided to aid the general nephrologist in implementation of novel biomarkers in their clinical practice.

"Transplantomics" for predicting allograft rejection: real-life applications and new strategies from Network Medicine

Although decades of the reductionist approach achieved great milestones in optimizing the immunosuppression therapy, traditional clinical parameters still fail in predicting both acute and chronic (mainly) rejection events leading to higher rates across all solid organ transplants. To clarify the underlying immune-related cellular and molecular mechanisms, current biomedical research is increasingly focusing on "transplantomics" which relies on a huge quantity of big data deriving from genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics platforms. The AlloMap (gene expression) and the AlloSure (donor-derived cell-free DNA) tests represent two successful examples of how omics and liquid biopsy can really improve the precision medicine of heart and kidney transplantation. One of the major challenges in translating big data in clinically useful biomarkers is the integration and interpretation of the different layers of omics datasets. Network Medicine offers advanced bioinformatic-molecular strategies which were widely used to integrate large omics datasets and clinical information in end-stage patients to prioritize potential biomarkers and drug targets. The application of network-oriented approaches to clarify the complex nature of graft rejection is still in its infancy. Here, we briefly discuss the real-life clinical applications derived from omics datasets as well as novel opportunities for establishing predictive tests in solid organ transplantation. Also, we provide an original "graft rejection interactome" and propose network-oriented strategies which can be useful to improve precision medicine of solid organ transplantation.

Role of the Immune System in Renal Transplantation, Types of Response, Technical Approaches and Current Challenges

Advances over the last decades have made renal transplantation an important therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease, as the incidences of acute rejection and short-term transplant loss have been significantly reduced. However, long-term transplant survival remains a challenge in the renal transplantation community. The main causes of long-term graft loss are acute and chronic rejection, as well as the complications related to immunosuppression therapy. In spite of the breakthroughs achieved in recent years, histology is the gold standard technique to confirm the activation of the immune system against the graft with all the ensuing problems that taking biopsies brings to immunosuppressed patients. For this reason, several assays have been developed to try to monitor the immune function, but they show serious constraints owing to the fact that they require substantial laboratory work, they are not clinically available and they provide controversial results, so the combination of multiple assays is often needed to obtain a reliable diagnosis. Thus, the aim of this review is to perform a retrospective study of the immune system in renal transplantation, with special emphasis on the cutting-edge technological developments for monitoring, classification and early detection of rejection episodes in order to contribute to a better adjustment of immunosuppressive therapies and, hence, to a more personalized medicine that improves the quality of life of patients.

Emerging role of cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation

Monitoring kidney transplants for rejection conventionally includes serum creatinine, immunosuppressive drug levels, proteinuria, and donor-specific antibody (DSA). Serum creatinine is a late marker of allograft injury, and the predictive ability of DSA regarding risk of rejection is variable. Histological analysis of an allograft biopsy is the standard method for diagnosing rejection but is invasive, inconvenient, and carries risk of complications. There has been a long quest to find a perfect biomarker that noninvasively predicts tissue injury caused by rejection at an early stage, so that diagnosis and treatment could be pursued without delay in order to minimize irreversible damage to the allograft. In this review, we discuss relatively novel research on identifying biomarkers of tissue injury, specifically elaborating on donor-derived cell-free DNA, and its clinical utility.

Novel ways to monitor immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplant recipients-underlying concepts and emerging data

After pediatric kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy is given to avoid acute and chronic rejections. However, the immunosuppression causes an increased risk of severe viral complications and bacterial infections and is associated with serious side effects. It is therefore crucial to achieve the optimal individual balance between over- and under-immunosuppression and thereby avoid unnecessary exposure to immunosuppressive drugs. In routine use, steering of immunosuppressants is performed primarily by monitoring of trough levels that mirror pharmacokinetics (although not, however, pharmacodynamics). Other diagnostic and prognostic markers to assess the individual intensity of immunosuppression are missing. Potential methods to determine immune function and grade of immunosuppression, such as analysis of the torque teno virus (TTV) load, QuantiFERON Monitor®, and ImmuKnow® as well as virus-specific T cells (Tvis), are currently being evaluated. In some studies TTV load, QuantiFERON Monitor® and ImmuKnow® were associated with the risk for post-transplant rejections and infections, but randomized controlled trials after pediatric kidney transplantation are not available. Post-transplant monitoring of Tvis levels seem to be promising because Tvis control virus replication and have been shown to correlate with virus-specific as well as general cellular immune defense, which represents the individual’s susceptibility to infections. Additional Tvis-monitoring provides an innovative opportunity to personalize the antiviral management and the dosing of the immunosuppressive therapy after pediatric kidney transplantation to avoid unnecessary therapeutic interventions and identify over-immunosuppression.

Application of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Solid Organ Transplantation Recipients: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a treatment method for end-stage organ diseases and improve their life quality, while using long-term immunosuppressant drugs (ISD) is needed to suppress the function of the immune system. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a class of anti-tumor drugs that kill tumors by activating the autoimmune system. The primary objective of our systematic review is to investigate the risk factors for organ rejection and the efficacy of ICIs in solid organ transplantation recipients (SOTRs).

METHODS

We searched four databases to find relevant articles up to January 2021. A total of 61 articles involving 106 SOTRs met the screening criteria and were included in our systematic review. The collected data were statistical described, and the risk factors were analyzed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (41.5%) developed host-versus-graft response (HVGR) after ICIs. mTOR inhibitors (pre-ICIs) (p = 0.069, OR = 0.377, 95% CI 0.132-1.078) and calcineurin inhibitors (post-ICIs) (p = 0.056, OR = 0.375, 95%CI 0.137-1.025) may help reduce the incidence of HVGR. Hormones (pre-ICIs) (p = 0.026, OR = 3.150, 95%CI 1.150-8.628) and anti-metabolites (pre-ICIs) (p = 0.022, OR = 3.214, 95%CI 1.185-8.720) may adversely affect the efficacy of ICIs. Only 35.6% of patients both responded well to ICIs treatment and did not develop HVGR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review summarizes the use of ICIs in SOTRs and evaluates the efficacy of ICIs and the risk factors that induce HVGR. Through risk factor analysis, we found that mTOR inhibitors and calcineurin inhibitors may help to reduce the occurrence of HVGR; hormones and anti-metabolic drugs may have adverse effects on the efficacy of ICIs. In addition, there is a contradictory relationship between the occurrence of HVGR and the efficacy of ICIs.

Immune cell function assays in the diagnosis of infection in pediatric liver transplantation: an open-labeled, two center prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Limited studies have been performed in assessment of immune status of pediatric liver transplants (PLTs). We conducted this study to evaluate Cylex immune cell function assay in diagnosis of infection and its potential clinical application in Chinese infant PLTs.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 227 infant PLTs from two medical centers were enrolled, and 216 completed the study. Cylex ATP values were measured before and after liver transplantation (LT) at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 and 24 respectively. Accordingly, patients' clinical records, including demographic data, liver function results, tacrolimus dosages and concentrations were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty of 216 PLTs (74.1%) were diagnosed infection based on the parameters including abnormal vital signs, imaging changes, and pathogens detection, while 44 (20.4%) were clinically stable and 12 (5.6%) experienced acute rejection. The median Cylex ATP value in infant PLTs post-surgery reduced significantly in infection group compared to stable group (median, 137 vs. 269 ng/mL, P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined that the cut-off value of Cylex ATP was 152 ng/mL in diagnosis of infection [area under the curve (AUC): 0.784, 95% CI: 0.720-0.848]. Meanwhile, Cylex ATP value showed no correlation to tacrolimus dosage, blood concentration, dose-normalized concentration/dose ratio or Kaup index. However, it tended to correlate weakly with the white blood cell (WBC) number (R =0.462, P<0.0001) and lymphocyte counts (R =0.363, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrated that low Cylex ATP represented partly over-immunosuppression and had diagnostic value in infant PLTs with infections, which might assist individualized immunosuppression in PLT patients.

Absolute lymphocyte count as marker of cytomegalovirus and allograft rejection: Is there a "Safe Corridor" after kidney transplantation?

The contrasting outcomes of lymphocyte manipulation after solid organ transplantation are allograft rejection and infections, commonly with cytomegalovirus (CMV). Peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) may serve as a predictive marker for these outcomes. Using a retrospective review of clinical and laboratory dataset, we aimed to determine whether a range of ALC (termed "safe ALC corridor") exists where CMV infection and rejection outcomes are minimal in a cohort of 381 kidney transplant recipients. In an extended Cox model using a time-dependent covariate for peripheral blood ALC, a value below the cut-off of 610 cells/uL was associated with the development of CMV infection both in the overall cohort (Hazard Ratio [HR] 2.25 (95% confidence internal [CI] 1.02-4.96; P = .043) and the subgroup of high-risk CMV D+/R- mismatch patients (HR 2.91 [95% CI 1.09-7.77]; P = .033). In contrast, a time-dependent Cox analysis did not show any significant association between ALC and rejection (per IQR decrease, HR 1.2 [95% CI: 0.76-1.9]; P = .434). Accordingly, a "safe ALC corridor" could not be defined. In conclusion, a low peripheral blood ALC (ie, threshold of 610 cells/uL) can be used to stratify the risk of CMV disease after kidney transplantation.

Evaluation of cell-mediated immune response by QuantiFERON Monitor Assay in kidney transplant recipients presenting with infective complications

The net level of immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients is difficult to assess. QuantiFERON Monitor (QFM) is an in vitro diagnostic test that detects interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release in peripheral blood. The aim of our study was to compare QFM testing results in stable kidney transplant recipients and kidney transplant recipients with infection, in a single-centre cohort.We enrolled 71 kidney transplant recipients from our transplantation centre. They were divided into 2 groups according to clinical presentation (Stable kidney transplant recipients or Infection).There were no significant differences in interferon-γ release between the 2 groups (Stable kidney transplant recipients 140.59 ± 215.28 IU/ml, Infection group 78.37 ± 197.03 IU/ml, P = .24). A further analysis revealed that kidney transplant recipients presenting with bacterial infection had significantly lower IFN-γ release when compared to stable kidney transplant recipients (26.52 ± 42.46 IU/ml vs 140.59 ± 215.28 IU/ml, P = .04).Kidney transplant recipients presenting with bacterial infection had lower IFN-γ release when compared to stable kidney transplant recipients. The QFM test may be useful as a tool to help guide immunosuppression dosing in kidney transplant recipients, but further studies are required to confirm its diagnostic value.

The damage response framework and infection prevention: From concept to bedside

Hospital-acquired infections remain a common cause of morbidity and mortality despite advances in infection prevention through use of bundles, environmental cleaning, antimicrobial stewardship, and other best practices. Current prevention strategies and further hospital-acquired infection reduction are limited by lack of recognition of the role that host-microbe interactions play in susceptibility and by the inability to analyze multiple risk factors in real time to accurately predict the likelihood of a hospital-acquired infection before it occurs and to inform medical decision making. Herein, we examine the value of incorporating the damage-response framework and host attributes that determine susceptibility to infectious diseases known by the acronym MISTEACHING (ie, microbiome, immunity, sex, temperature, environment, age, chance, history, inoculum, nutrition, genetics) into infection prevention strategies using machine learning to drive decision support and patient-specific interventions.

Biomarkers in Solid Organ Transplantation

After more than 6 decades of clinical practice, the transplant community continues to research noninvasive biomarkers of solid organ injury to help improve patient care. In this review, we discuss the clinical usefulness of selective biomarkers and how they are processed at the laboratory. In addition, we organize these biomarkers based on specific aims and introduce innovative markers currently under investigation.

Drug Metabolism, Drug Interactions, and Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Living Donor Liver Transplant Patients

Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) fills a critically needed gap in the number of livers available for transplant. However, little is known about the functional recovery of the liver in the donor and in the recipient after surgery. Given that both donor and recipients are treated with several drugs, it is important to characterize the time course of recovery of hepatic synthetic, metabolic, and excretory function in these patients. In the absence of data from LDLT, information on the effect of liver disease on the pharmacokinetics of medications can be used as guidance for drug dosing in LDLT patients.

Moving Biomarkers toward Clinical Implementation in Kidney Transplantation

Long-term kidney transplant outcomes remain suboptimal, delineating an unmet medical need. Although current immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is effective, dosing is conventionally adjusted empirically on the basis of time after transplant or altered in response to detection of kidney dysfunction, histologic evidence of allograft damage, or infection. Such strategies tend to detect allograft rejection after significant injury has already occurred, fail to detect chronic subclinical inflammation that can negatively affect graft survival, and ignore specific risks and immune mechanisms that differentially contribute to allograft damage among transplant recipients. Assays and biomarkers that reliably quantify and/or predict the risk of allograft injury have the potential to overcome these deficits and thereby, aid clinicians in optimizing immunosuppressive regimens. Herein, we review the data on candidate biomarkers that we contend have the highest potential to become clinically useful surrogates in kidney transplant recipients, including functional T cell assays, urinary gene and protein assays, peripheral blood cell gene expression profiles, and allograft gene expression profiles. We identify barriers to clinical biomarker adoption in the transplant field and suggest strategies for moving biomarker-based individualization of transplant care from a research hypothesis to clinical implementation.

An optimized protocol for adenosine triphosphate quantification in T lymphocytes of lymphopenic patients

In several clinical contexts, the measurement of ATP concentration in T lymphocytes has been proposed as a biomarker of immune status, predictive of secondary infections. However, the use of such biomarker in lymphopenic patients requires some adaptations in the ATP dosage protocol. We used blood from healthy volunteers to determine the optimal experimental settings. We investigated technical aspects such as the type of anticoagulant for blood sampling, the effect of freeze and thaw cycles, the reagent and sample mixing sequence, and the optimal dilution buffer. We also shortened the incubation time to 8h, and even showed that a 30min incubation may be sufficient. To evaluate the ATP rise upon lymphocyte activation, the optimal dose of stimulant was defined to be 4μg/mL of phytohaemagglutinin. Lastly, we determined that the number of T cells needed for this measurement was as low as 50,000, which is compatible with the existing lymphopenia in clinical settings. This optimized protocol appears ready to be assessed in lymphopenic patients to further investigate the interconnection between T lymphocyte metabolism and impaired phenotype and functions.

Lowered Immune Cell Function in Liver Recipients Recovered From Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease Who Developed Graft Tolerance

Tolerance after treatment and recovery from posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) have been described but little is known about the immunology. The objective of this study is to evaluate the immunity of pediatric recipients who recovered from PTLD.

Immunosuppression Modifications Based on an Immune Response Assay: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

An immune function assay shows promise for identifying solid organ recipients at risk for infection or rejection. The following randomized prospective study was designed to assess the clinical benefits of adjusting immunosuppressive therapy in liver recipients based on immune function assay results.

METHODS

Adult liver recipients were randomized to standard practice (control group; n = 102) or serial immune function testing (interventional group; n = 100) performed with a commercially available in vitro diagnostic assay (ImmuKnow; Viracor-IBT Laboratories, Lee's Summit, MO) before transplantation, immediately after surgery and at day 1, weeks 1 to 4, 6, and 8, and months 3 to 6, 9, and 12. The assay was repeated within 7 days of suspected/confirmed rejection/infection and within 1 week after event resolution.

RESULTS

Based on immune function values, tacrolimus doses were reduced 25% when values were less than 130 ng/mL adenosine triphosphate (low immune cell response) and increased 25% when values were greater than 450 ng/mL adenosine triphosphate (strong immune cell response). The 1-year patient survival was significantly higher in the interventional arm (95% vs 82%; P < 0.01) and the incidence of infections longer than 14 days after transplantation was significantly lower among patients in the interventional arm (42.0% vs. 54.9%, P < 0.05). The difference in infection rates was because of lower bacterial (32% vs 46%; P < 0.05) and fungal infection (2% vs 11%; P < 0.05). Among recipients without adverse events, the study group had lower tacrolimus dosages and blood levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune function testing provided additional data which helped optimize immunosuppression and improve patient outcomes.

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies

Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and reduces the risk of mortality. A majority of the success of kidney transplantation is attributable to the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), cyclosporine and tacrolimus, and their ability to reduce acute rejection rates. However, long-term graft survival rates have not improved over time, and although controversial, evidence does suggest a role of chronic CNI toxicity in this failure to improve outcomes. Consequently, there is interest in reducing or removing CNIs from immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to improve outcomes. Several strategies exist to spare calcineurin inhibitors, including use of agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), sirolimus, everolimus or belatacept to facilitate late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal, beyond 6 mo post-transplant; or using these agents to plan early withdrawal within 6 mo; or to avoid the CNIs all together using CNI-free regimens. Although numerous reviews have been written on this topic, practice varies significantly between centers. This review organizes the data based on patient characteristics (i.e., the baseline immunosuppressive regimen) as a means to aid the practicing clinician in caring for their patients, by matching up their situation with the relevant literature. The current review, the first in a series of two, examines the potential of immunosuppressive agents to facilitate late CNI withdrawal beyond 6 mo post-transplant, and has demonstrated that the strongest evidence resides with MMF/MPS. MMF or MPS can be successfully introduced/maintained to facilitate late CNI withdrawal and improve renal function in the setting of graft deterioration, albeit with an increased risk of acute rejection and infection. Additional benefits may include improved blood pressure, lipid profile and serum glucose. Sirolimus has less data directly comparing CNI withdrawal to an active CNI-containing regimen, but modest improvement in short-term renal function is possible, with an increased risk of proteinuria, especially in the setting of baseline renal dysfunction and/or proteinuria. Renal outcomes may be improved when sirolimus is used in combination with MMF. Although data with everolimus is less robust, results appear similar to those observed with sirolimus.

Serial ImmuKnow assay in stable kidney transplant recipients

Objectives

The ImmuKnow assay (cylex Inc., Columbia, MD) has been reported to measure the global immune monitoring tool for organ transplantation recipients. We assess immuKnow ATP values in stable kidney transplant patients.

Material and methods

Patients who were kidney transplanted between September 2008 and May 2011 were enrolled in the prospective serial ImmuKnow assay study. The criteria of inclusion were living donor kidney transplantation (KT), no evidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and PRA less than 50%. ImmuKnow assay monitoring was performed at one day before operation, post operative weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36 and 52. We excluded patients who had undergone infectious syndrome or rejection episodes during the follow-up period.

Results

Among 71 patients who were enrolled in prospective serial ImmuKnow assay monitoring, 37 patients were proven to stable KT patients during the follow-up period. Two hundred and twenty-four samples from 37 patients were collected. ImmuKnow value and immunosuppression drug level were compared in post operative weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36 and 52. The value of ImmuKnow assay was significantly different depending on the length of time after transplant (p = 0.038). Interestingly, the pre-transplant ImmuKnow values were lower than those of the immediate post-transplant period.

Conclusions

The ImmuKnow value of stable KT recipients is different according to “time after transplant”. Therefore, “time after transplant” should be considered when applying an ImmuKnow assay in clinical practice.