Solid organ transplantation in the HIV-infected patient: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

Beyond the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act: Roadmap to expanding kidney and liver transplants for people with human immunodeficiency virus utilizing grafts from donors with human immunodeficiency virus

People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PWH) face limited access to organ transplantation despite higher rates of end-organ disease. The HIV Organ Policy Equity Act, enacted in 2015, allowed transplants from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV (HIV D+/R+) under research protocols. Studies have since demonstrated overall comparable outcomes between HIV D+/R+ and donors without HIV/R+ transplants, leading to the removal of the research requirement for HIV D+/R+ kidney and liver transplants in November 2024. However, some remaining medical concerns and systemic barriers still need to be addressed, especially for centers that did not participate in the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act. This manuscript reviewed the history, evidence, and key considerations for HIV D+/R+ kidney and liver transplants. Furthermore, a roadmap for implementation, emphasizing the need for reviewing local regulations, establishing multidisciplinary teams, developing personalized protocols, providing medical and cultural training, engaging organ procurement organizations and the local PWH community, and continuing data collection and quality improvement, is discussed. The removal of research restrictions offers a critical opportunity to reduce disparities in transplant access for PWH. Transplant providers should embrace this opportunity to expand access while continuing to address the remaining medical and systemic challenges to ensure that more PWHs receive life-saving transplants.

Comparable Short-Term Survival in HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Dual Organ Heart Transplant Recipients: A Call for Increased Access to Organ Donation for People Living with HIV

Access to organ transplantation for HIV-positive individuals is expanding, yet the outcomes of HIV-positive patients requiring multiorgan transplant are not well-defined. Adult individuals in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry who were HIV-positive and received HT between 2010 and 2023 were included. The primary outcome was patient survival. During the study period, 175 HIV-positive patients were transplanted. Twenty-six (14.8%) underwent dual organ transplantation (20 heart/kidney, 4 heart/lung, and 2 heart/liver) at 23 centers. Median age at the time of HT was 56 years (IQR 47-60), majority were male (n=18, 69%), and 46% identified as Black (n= 12). Dilated cardiomyopathy was the most common etiology of heart failure (n=13, 50%). All patients received organs from HIV-negative donors. The probability of surviving at least one year was 87.6% (95% CI 81.0- 92.0) for single-organ recipients and 82.9% for dual organ recipients (95% CI 60.0-93.4). There was no difference in overall survival between HIV-positive and HIV-negative matched controls among dual organ recipients (log-rank p-value = 0.8). Over the last decade, only a small number of HIV-positive individuals with end-stage heart failure have undergone dual organ transplantation with encouraging short-term outcomes.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in people living with HIV

People living with HIV (PLWH) carry a higher risk of developing chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This relates to shared transmission pathways of HIV and viral hepatitis and a plethora of direct and indirect effects of HIV in the progression of chronic liver disease and HCC. In absence of active cancer treatment, the prognosis of PLWH affected by HCC is worse compared to matched controls without HIV. Evolving evidence suggests that PLWH may receive curative therapies including liver transplantation, loco-regional and systemic anti-cancer therapy for HCC with comparable benefit than people without HIV, underscoring that well controlled HIV infection should not be a barrier to the delivery of cancer care. Nevertheless, PLWH have historically been excluded from interventional clinical trials, and most of the evidence supporting clinical decision making in this population comes from small retrospective studies, adding further challenges to the management of PLWH affected by HCC. Furthermore, whether the biology of the tumour and its microenvironment is influenced by HIV and affects response to treatment is incompletely understood. In this review we summarise the current understanding of pathophysiology, screening and management of HCC in PLWH and discuss the persisting challenges and disparities in care which may contribute to clinical outcome in PLWH.

Proof of Concept that Implementation of a Multispecialty Educational Intervention May Improve Acceptance of Organs from Donors with HIV at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

People living with HIV have a higher waitlist mortality and decreased access to transplants. The enactment of the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act (HOPE Act) in 2013 was a step toward increasing the donor population. However, utilization of organs through the act has been less than initially anticipated, both nationally and initially at our center.

METHODS

To improve the acceptance of abdominal organs from donors with positive HIV tests (D+) for recipients with HIV (R+), we implemented a multidisciplinary educational intervention at our center in December 2020.

RESULTS

Comparing the preintervention period (March 2018-November 2020) to the postintervention period (December 2020-April 2022), the number of organs that were declined for potentially HIV-related reasons decreased significantly from 91% to 63% (p = 0.004). The proportion of organs declined at our center for potentially HIV-related reasons that were accepted later by another center was 40% (10/25) preintervention and 24% (12/49) postintervention (p = 0.2). The rate of transplants/patient-years on our center's waiting list overall tripled (IRR 3.11; 95% CI 1.08-9.44, p = 0.036), with the rate of HIV D+/R+ transplants increasing more dramatically (IRR 16.3; 95% CI 2.90-305, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Intensive provider education may have an impact on improving rates of transplantation of HIV+ recipients and realizing the potential of the HOPE ACT.

Pancreas transplant outcomes in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection

There is limited information on access and outcomes of patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH) who have undergone pancreas transplantation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study analyzing data from the United Network for Organ Sharing from July 1, 2001, to June 30, 2021. Recipients of pancreas transplant were stratified by HIV serostatus. Graft and patient survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were generated to identify factors associated with increased mortality or graft loss. Fifty PLWH and 16 380 patients without HIV underwent pancreas (with kidney) transplantation. PLWH were more often male (P < .001), Black/African American (P = .009), and on Medicare (P = .004). There were no significant differences in waiting time (P = .159) or proportion of patients treated for rejection within 1 year of transplant (P = .189) between groups. There were no differences in pancreas graft survival (P = .964) and overall patient survival (P = .250) between the cohorts. Dialysis status was negatively associated with graft survival. Although PLWH were more likely to represent a historically marginalized population, their outcomes after pancreas transplant were similar to their HIV-negative counterparts.

Dolutegravir-based Antiretroviral Therapy in People With HIV With Solid Organ Transplantation: A Single-arm Pilot Clinical Trial (DTG-SOT)

Background

This study assessed the pharmacokinetic interactions between dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) and immunosuppressants in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients with HIV and ART safety.

Methods

A phase IV, single-center, open-label, single-arm clinical trial (DTG-SOT, NCT03360682) including adult SOT recipients with HIV conducted between 2017 and 2019. People with HIV with plasma viral load <50 copies/mL during ≥12 months and receiving stable raltegravir-based ART during ≥6 months were switched to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine or lamivudine/abacavir + DTG and followed up for 48 weeks. Immunosuppressant pharmacokinetic parameters were compared before and 2 weeks after ART switch (primary outcome). Efficacy and safety were analyzed at 48 weeks by intention-to-treat analysis.

Results

Nineteen consecutive participants (median, 57 years; interquartile range, 51-60), mostly liver recipients (63.2%), received DTG/lamivudine/abacavir (63.2%) and DTG + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (36.8%). Pharmacokinetic parameters changed, albeit not significantly, before and after ART, for mycophenolic acid (maximum [Cmax] +63%, trough [Cmin] +53%, area under the curve [AUC] +16%; n = 7) and cyclosporine A (Cmax -64%, Cmin +14%, AUC -47%; n = 2), with smaller changes for tacrolimus (Cmax +14%, Cmin -29%, AUC -9%; n = 7). No participants experienced acute rejection or virological failure and CD4+ cell counts and percentages remained unchanged during follow-up. Three (15.8%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased (P = 0.0015) and creatinine increased (P = 0.0001) slightly.

Conclusions

DTG-based ART lacked clinically significant drug-drug interactions with tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Switching to DTG-based ART was effective in people with HIV SOT recipients. More studies are needed to evaluate DTG safety in this setting.

Evaluating Challenges in Access To Transplantation for Persons with HIV

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiretroviral therapy has significantly improved the life expectancy of people with HIV (PWH), leading to an increased prevalence of comorbidities such as end-stage organ diseases. PWH with end-stage disease face a significantly higher risk of mortality compared to those without HIV, highlighting the urgent need to improve access to organ transplantation for this vulnerable group. This review examines barriers to organ transplantation for PWH, utilizing a modified five A's model (acceptability, availability, accessibility, affordability, accommodation).

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite comparable post-transplant outcomes to the general population, PWH are less likely to receive organ transplants. The HIV Organ Policy and Equity (HOPE) Act has expanded the donor pool by permitting organ transplants from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV. However, factors limiting expansion include policy, logistical constraints, and HIV-related stigma. Despite pivotal advancements in HIV organ transplantation, multilevel challenges continue to limit access for PWH. Addressing these barriers is essential to ensuring equitable access to this life-saving therapy.

An Enhanced Role of Innate Immunity in the Immune Response After Kidney Transplant in People Living With HIV: A Transcriptomic Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although kidney transplantation (KT) has become the standard of care for people living with HIV (PLWH) suffering from renal failure, early experiences revealed unanticipated higher rejection rates than those observed in HIV- recipients. The cause of increased acute rejection (AR) in PLWH was assessed by performing a transcriptomic analysis of biopsy specimens, comparing HIV+ to HIV- recipients.

METHODS

An analysis of 68 (34 HIV+, 34 HIV-) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) renal biopsies matched for degree of inflammation was performed from KT recipients with acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR), borderline for aTCMR (BL), and normal findings. Gene expression was measured using the NanoString platform on a custom gene panel to assess differential gene expression (DE) and pathway analysis (PA).

RESULTS

DE analysis revealed multiple genes with significantly increased expression in the HIV+ cohort in aTCMR and BL relative to the HIV- cohort. PA of these genes showed enrichment of various inflammatory pathways, particularly innate immune pathways associated with Toll-like receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Upregulation of the innate immune pathways in the biopsies of PLWH with aTCMR and BL is suggestive of a unique immune response that may stem from immune dysregulation related to HIV infection. These findings suggest that these unique HIV-driven pathways may in part be contributory to the increased incidence of allograft rejection after renal transplantation in PLWH.

Presentation and Outcomes of Histoplasmosis in Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Histoplasmosis is an important infection among transplant recipients. Few studies have described its epidemiology and outcomes in the modern era.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis using medical records from a single center in the United States. We included patients 18 years or older with histoplasmosis. We divided the cohort into transplant recipients and immunocompetent groups to assess the outcomes in both groups. We utilized Cox hazard models to assess 90-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The study included 137 patients; with 28 (20%) transplant recipients. After the first year post-transplant, patients with lung transplant (30%) had a diagnosis of histoplasmosis. Transplant recipients exhibited a significantly higher incidence of disseminated histoplasmosis than immunocompetent patients (64% vs. 34%, p = 0.001), higher admission to ICU (39% vs. 16%; p = 0.01) and higher but not significant 90-day crude all-cause mortality (14% vs. 11%, p = 0.71). Patients with transplants had a higher, but not significant hazard of all-cause mortality at 90 days (hazard ratio: 1.5; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-3.9) when compared to immunocompetent patients.

CONCLUSION

Transplant recipients were more commonly diagnosed with histoplasmosis after the first year post-transplantation, and although they exhibited a higher hazard for death at 90 days, this increase was not statistically significant.

Minding the gap: How transplant infectious disease can help close the organ donation gap

This paper is an educationally focused article discussing how transplant infectious diseases (TID) providers balance the risks of accepting or rejecting an organ and have pushed barriers in organ transplantation. We emphasize the role TID providers play in the transplantation process as critical players on the transplant team. We discuss various donor-derived infections that were previously deemed unacceptable for donation due to concerns for transmission. Advances in medical knowledge have changed some of these situations. We discuss the critical role TID providers have in closing the gap between the thousands of patients on organ waitlists and the organ deficit faced each day. We believe TID providers have a unique opportunity to expand the donor pool by increasing education, expanding acceptable organ definitions, and expanding the boundaries of what we can do with potentially transmissible infections in organ transplantation.

Safety of Kidney Transplantation from Donors with HIV

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation from donors with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to recipients with HIV is an emerging practice. It has been performed since 2016 under the U.S. congressional HIV Organ Policy Equity Act and is currently approved for research only. The Department of Health and Human Services is considering expanding the procedure to clinical practice, but data are limited to small case series that did not include donors without HIV as controls.

METHODS

In an observational study conducted at 26 U.S. centers, we compared transplantation of kidneys from deceased donors with HIV and donors without HIV to recipients with HIV. The primary outcome was a safety event (a composite of death from any cause, graft loss, serious adverse event, HIV breakthrough infection, persistent failure of HIV treatment, or opportunistic infection), assessed for noninferiority (margin for the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval, 3.00). Secondary outcomes included overall survival, survival without graft loss, rejection, infection, cancer, and HIV superinfection.

RESULTS

We enrolled 408 transplantation candidates, of whom 198 received a kidney from a deceased donor; 99 received a kidney from a donor with HIV and 99 from a donor without HIV. The adjusted hazard ratio for the composite primary outcome was 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.38), which showed noninferiority. The following secondary outcomes were similar whether the donor had HIV or not: overall survival at 1 year (94% vs. 95%) and 3 years (85% vs. 87%), survival without graft loss at 1 year (93% vs. 90%) and 3 years (84% vs. 81%), and rejection at 1 year (13% vs. 21%) and 3 years (21% vs. 24%). The incidence of serious adverse events, infections, surgical or vascular complications, and cancer was similar in the groups. The incidence of HIV breakthrough infection was higher among recipients of kidneys from donors with HIV (incidence rate ratio, 3.14; 95%, CI, 1.02 to 9.63), with one potential HIV superinfection among the 58 recipients in this group with sequence data and no persistent failures of HIV treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study of kidney transplantation in persons with HIV, transplantation from donors with HIV appeared to be noninferior to that from donors without HIV. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03500315.).

Infectious disease events in people with HIV receiving kidney transplantation: Analysis of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Since the implementation of universal antiretroviral therapy, kidney transplantation (K-Tx) has become a valuable option for treatment of end-stage kidney disease for people with HIV (PWH) with similar patient and graft survival as compared to HIV-uninfected patients. Little is known about the hazards and manifestations of infectious disease (ID) events occurring in kidney transplant recipients with HIV.

METHODS

Using linked information collected in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) and the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS), we described in-depth demographical and clinical characteristics of PWH who received a K-Tx since 2008. Further, we performed recurrent time to event analyses to understand whether HIV was an independent risk factor for ID events.

RESULTS

Overall, 24 PWH with 57 ID events were included in this study (100% match of SHCS to STCS). Of these, 17 (70.8%) patients had at least one ID event: 22 (38.6%) viral (HIV not counted), 18 (31.6%) bacterial, one (1.8%) fungal and 16 (28.1%) probable infections. Most ID events affected the respiratory tract (25, 37.3%) or the urinary tract (13, 19.4%). Pathogen types and infection sites were similar in PWH and a matched control group of HIV-uninfected patients. HIV was not an independent risk factor for ID events (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, p = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

By linking data from two large national Swiss cohorts, we provided in-depth information on ID events in PWH receiving a K-Tx in Switzerland. HIV infection was not associated with an increased hazard for ID events after K-Tx.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Deceased Donors With HIV in the Era of the HOPE Act: Referrals and Procurement

Background

The HIV Organ Policy Equity Act legalizes organ procurement from donors with HIV (HIV D+). A prior survey of Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) estimated >2000 HIV D+ referrals/year; however, only 30-35 HIV D+/year have had organs procured. Given this gap, we sought to understand HIV D+ referrals and procurements in practice.

Methods

We prospectively collected data on all OPO-reported HIV D+ referrals, including reasons for nonprocurement. We evaluated trends and compared HIV D+ characteristics by procurement status using regression, chi-squared tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Results

From December 23, 2015 to May 31, 2021, there were 710 HIV D+ referrals from 49 OPOs, of which 171 (24%) had organs procured. HIV D+ referrals increased from 7 to 15 per month (P < 0.001), and the procurement rate increased from 10% to 39% (P < 0.001). Compared with HIV D+ without procurement, HIV D+ with procurement were younger (median age 36 versus 50 y), more commonly White (46% versus 36%), and more often had trauma-related deaths (29% versus 8%) (all P < 0.001). Nonprocurement was attributed to medical reasons in 63% of cases, of which 36% were AIDS-defining infections and 64% were HIV-unrelated, commonly due to organ failure (36%), high neurologic function (31%), and cancer (14%). Nonprocurement was attributed to nonmedical reasons in 26% of cases, commonly due to no authorization (42%), no waitlist candidates (21%), or no transplant center interest (20%).

Conclusions

In the early years of the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act, actual HIV D+ referrals were much lower than prior estimates; however, the numbers and procurement rates increased over time. Nonprocurement was attributed to both medical and nonmedical issues, and addressing these issues could increase organ availability.

Liver Transplantation in Chronic Liver Disease and Acute on Chronic Liver Failure- Indication, Timing and Practices

Liver transplantation (LT) is the second most common solid organ transplantation worldwide. LT is considered the best and most definitive therapeutic option for patients with decompensated chronic liver disease (CLD), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), acute liver failure (ALF), and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). The etiology of CLD shows wide geographical variation, with viral hepatitis being the major etiology in the east and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) in the west. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is on an increasing trend and is expected to be the most common etiology on a global scale. Since the first successful LT, there have been radical changes in the indications for LT. In many circumstances, not just the liver disease itself but factors such as extra-hepatic organ dysfunction or failures necessitate LT. ACLF is a dynamic syndrome that has extremely high short-term mortality. Currently, there is no single approved therapy for ACLF, and LT seems to be the only feasible therapeutic option for selected patients at high risk of mortality. Early identification of ACLF, stratification of patients according to disease severity, aggressive organ support, and etiology-specific treatment approaches have a significant impact on post-transplant outcomes. This review briefly describes the indications, timing, and referral practices for LT in patients with CLD and ACLF.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Expanding Access to Organ Transplant for People Living With HIV: Can Policy Catch Up to Outcomes Data?

Advances in antiretroviral and immunosuppressive regimens have improved outcomes following solid organ transplantation in people living with HIV (PLWH). The HIV Organ Policy and Equity Act was conceived to reduce the discard of HIV-positive organs and improve access to transplant for PLWH. Nevertheless, PLWH continue to experience disproportionately low rates of transplant. This overview examines the hurdles to transplantation in PLWH with end-organ disease, the potential and realized impact of the HIV Organ Policy and Equity Act, and changes that could permit expanded access to organ transplant in this population.

Lung transplantation in HIV seropositive recipients: An analysis of the UNOS registry

BACKGROUND

Experience with lung transplantation (LT) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is limited. Many studies have demonstrated the success of kidney and liver transplantation in HIV-seropositive (HIV+) patients. Our objective was to conduct a national registry analysis comparing LT outcomes in HIV+ to HIV-seronegative (HIV-) recipients.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried to identify LTs performed in adult HIV+ patients between 2016 and 2023. Patients with unknown HIV status, multiorgan transplants, and redo transplants were excluded. The primary endpoints were mortality and graft rejection. Survival time was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 17 487 patients, 67 of whom were HIV+. HIV+ recipients were younger (59 vs. 62 years, p = .02), had higher pulmonary arterial pressure (28 vs. 25 mm Hg, p = .04), and higher lung allocation scores (47 vs. 41, p = .01) relative to HIV- recipients. There were no differences in graft/recipient survival time between groups. HIV+ recipients had higher rates of post-transplant dialysis (18% vs. 8.4%, p = .01), but otherwise had similar post-transplant outcomes to HIV-recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

This national registry analysis suggests LT outcomes in HIV+ patients are not inferior to outcomes in HIV- patients and that well-selected HIV+ recipients can achieve comparable patient and graft survival rates relative to HIV- recipients.

Liver Transplantation in People Living with HIV: Still an Experimental Procedure or Standard of Care?

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative treatment for various liver diseases, including acute liver failure, end-stage liver disease, and selected unresectable liver malignancies. Combination antiretroviral therapy has improved outcomes for people living with HIV (PLWH), transforming the status of acquired immune deficiency syndrome from a fatal disease to a chronic and manageable condition. These powerful antiviral therapies have not only increased the number of HIV+ enlisted patients by improving their survival but also made the use of HIV+ organs a viable option. In this review, we summarise current knowledge on the peculiarities of liver transplantation in PLWH. In particular, we focus on the indications, contraindications, specific considerations for treatment, and outcomes of LT in PLWH. Finally, we present available preliminary data on the use of HIV+ liver allografts.

Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Infections in Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplant often is complicated by infections in the recipient from therapy-related and patient-related risk factors. Infections in kidney transplant recipients are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and allograft dysfunction. There is a predictable timeline after kidney transplant regarding the types of pathogens causing infections, reflecting the net state of immunosuppression. In the early post-transplant period, bacterial infections comprise two thirds of all infections, followed by viral and fungal infections. Infections occurring early after kidney transplantation are generally the result of postoperative complications. In most cases, opportunistic infections occur within 6 months after kidney transplantation. They may be caused by a new infection, a donor-derived infection, or reactivation of a latent infection. Community-acquired pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal infections are the most common infections in the late period after transplantation when the net immunosuppression is minimal. It is crucial to seek information on the time after transplant, reflecting the net state of immunosuppression, previous history of exposure/infections, geography, and seasonal outbreaks. It is imperative that we develop regionally specific guidelines on screening, prevention, and management of infections after kidney transplantation.

Racial Disparities in Access to the Kidney Transplant Waitlist Among People with Human Immunodeficiency Virus

The epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has shifted such that Black individuals disproportionately represent incident HIV diagnoses. While risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) among people with HIV (PWH) has declined with effective antiretroviral therapies, a substantial racial disparity in ESKD burden exists with the greatest prevalence among Black PWH. Disparities in waitlisting for kidney transplantation, the optimal treatment for ESKD, exist for both PWH and Black individuals without HIV, but it is unknown whether these characteristics together exacerbate such disparities. Six hundred two thousand six ESKD patients were identified from the United States Renal Data System (January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2017), and HIV-status was determined through Medicare claims. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine waitlisting rates. Multiplicative interaction terms between HIV-status and race were examined. The 6250 PWH were significantly younger, more commonly Black, and less commonly female than those without HIV. HIV-status and race were independently associated with 50% and 12% lower likelihood of waitlisting, respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.69, p < 0.001; aHR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.87-0.90, p < 0.001]. There was also a significant interaction present between HIV-status and Black race (aHR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66-0.98, p < 0.001) such that, while HIV-status and Black race were independently associated with decreased waitlisting, the interaction of Black race and HIV-status exacerbated those disparities. While limited by lack of HIV-specific data that may impact inferences with respect to race, additional studies are urgently needed to understand the interplay between HIV risk factors, HIV-stigma, and racism, and how intersectionality may exacerbate disparities in transplantation among PWH.

Immunosuppression in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF STUDY

The purpose of this review is to provide the current state of immunosuppression therapy in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with HIV and to discuss practical dilemmas to better understand and manage these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Certain studies find higher rates of rejection, which raises the need to critically assess the approach to immunosuppression management in HIV-positive KTR. Induction immunosuppression is guided by transplant center-level preference rather than by the individual patient characteristics. Earlier recommendations expressed concerns about the use of induction immunosuppression, especially utilizing lymphocyte-depleting agents; however, updated guidelines based on newer data recommend that induction can be used in HIV-positive KTR, and the choice of agent be made according to immunological risk. Likewise, most studies point out success with using first-line maintenance immunosuppression including tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. In selected patients, belatacept appears to be a promising alternative to calcineurin inhibitors with some well established advantages. Early discontinuation of steroids in this population carries a high risk of rejection and should be avoided.

SUMMARY

Immunosuppression management in HIV-positive KTR is complex and challenging, mainly because of the difficulty of maintaining a proper balance between rejection and infection. Interpretation and understanding of the current data towards a personalized approach of immunosuppression could improve management in HIV-positive KTR.

Switch from a ritonavir to a cobicistat containing antiretroviral regimen and impact on tacrolimus levels in a kidney transplant recipient

BACKGROUND

Solid-organ transplantation due to end-stage organ disease is increasingly performed in people living with HIV. Despite improved transplant outcomes, management of these patients remains challenging due to higher risk for allograft rejection, infection and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Complex regimens for multi-drug resistant HIV-viruses may cause DDIs particularly if the regimen contains drugs such as ritonavir or cobicistat.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we report on a case of an HIV-infected renal transplant recipient on long-term immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus dosed at 0.5 mg every 11 days due to the co-administration of a darunavir/ritonavir containing antiretroviral regimen. In the presented case the pharmacokinetic booster was switched from ritonavir to cobicistat for treatment simplification. A close monitoring of tacrolimus drug levels was performed in order to prevent possible sub- or supratherapeutic tacrolimus trough levels. A progressive decrease in tacrolimus concentrations was observed after switch requiring shortening of tacrolimus dosing interval. This observation was unexpected considering that cobicistat is devoid of inducing properties.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the fact that the pharmacokinetic boosters ritonavir and cobicistat are not fully interchangeable. Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is warranted to maintain levels within the therapeutic range.

Infections after organ transplantation and immune response

Organ transplantation has provided another chance of survival for end-stage organ failure patients. Yet, transplant rejection is still a main challenging factor. Immunosuppressive drugs have been used to avoid rejection and suppress the immune response against allografts. Thus, immunosuppressants increase the risk of infection in immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. The infection risk reflects the relationship between the nature and severity of immunosuppression and infectious diseases. Furthermore, immunosuppressants show an immunological impact on the genetics of innate and adaptive immune responses. This effect usually reactivates the post-transplant infection in the donor and recipient tissues since T-cell activation has a substantial role in allograft rejection. Meanwhile, different infections have been found to activate the T-cells into CD₄⁺ helper T-cell subset and CD₈⁺ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte that affect the infection and the allograft. Therefore, the best management and preventive strategies of immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and intensive medical care are required for successful organ transplantation. This review addresses the activation of immune responses against different infections in immunocompromised individuals after organ transplantation.

Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions in People Living With HIV Undergoing Solid Organ Transplantation: A Scoping Review

The pharmacotherapeutic management of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) undergoing solid organ transplantation (SOT) is clinically challenging, mainly due to the frequent occurrence of complex drug-drug interactions. Although various strategies have been proposed to improve treatment outcomes in these patients, several uncertainties remain, and consensus practice guidelines are just beginning to emerge. The main objective of this scoping review was to map the extent of the literature on the pharmacotherapeutic interventions performed by healthcare professionals for PLWHIV undergoing SOT.

Methods

We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane databases as well as gray literature for articles published between January 2010 and February 2020. Study selection was performed by at least 2 independent reviewers. Articles describing pharmacotherapeutic interventions in PLWHIV considered for or undergoing SOT were included in the study.

Results

Of the 12 599 references identified through our search strategy, 209 articles met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that the vast majority of reported pharmacotherapeutic interventions concerned the management of immunosuppressive and antimicrobial therapy, including antiretrovirals. Analysis of the data demonstrated that for several aspects of the pharmacotherapeutic management of PLWHIV undergoing SOT, there were differing practices, such as the choice of immunosuppressive induction and maintenance therapy. Other important aspects of patient management, such as patient counseling, were rarely reported.

Conclusions

Our results constitute an extensive overview of current practices in the pharmacotherapeutic management of SOT in PLWHIV and identify knowledge gaps that should be addressed to help improve patient care in this specific population.

Donors with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus for solid organ transplantation: what's new

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Passage of the HOPE Act and the advent of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies have allowed for expansion of the donor organ pool to include donors with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), thus providing new opportunities for waitlist candidates. This article provides updates on recent studies in solid organ transplantation (SOT) utilizing donors with HIV and HCV.

RECENT FINDINGS

The first pilot studies of kidney and liver transplantation from donors-with-HIV to recipients-with-HIV (HIV D+/R+) show robust patient survival, comparable graft survival to transplantation from donors without HIV (HIV D-/R+) and no increased rates of HIV breakthrough. The number of HIV D+ organs utilized has been lower than initial estimates due to several potential factors. With high numbers of overdose deaths from the opioid epidemic, there have been more HCV D+ organs available, leading to transplantation in recipients without HCV (HCV D+/R-) in combination with DAAs. Outcomes in both abdominal and thoracic HCV D+/R transplantation are excellent.

SUMMARY

With recent findings of good outcomes in both HIV D+/R+ and HCV D+/R- SOT, we feel the evidence supports both practices as standard clinical care options to mitigate organ shortage and reduce waitlist mortality.

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN HIV PATIENTS: A CASE SERIES FROM THE NORTHEAST REGION OF BRAZIL

BACKGROUND

The emergence of potent combined highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART) in 1996 changed the natural history of HIV infection, with a significant reduction in mortality due to opportunistic infections but increased morbidity due to chronic cardiovascular, hepatic, and renal diseases. In May 2016, a reference center for liver transplantation in the Northeast of Brazil performed the first liver transplantations (LT) in HIV patients, with five others until 2021.

METHODS

The criteria for selection of LT were good adherence and absence of resistance to ART, HIV viral load maximum suppression, T-CD4+ lymphocyte count of more than 100 cells/mm3, and absence of opportunistic infections in the last 6 months.

RESULTS

Six liver transplants were performed between May 2016 and May 2021, five men, with a mean age of 53.2 years, and one was a diabetic patient. All patients had access to grafts with short cold ischemia with a mean time of 5 hours and 39 minutes. The 4-month survival rate was 100%, with a range time of follow-up of 4-63 months (mean time of 31 months). The mean pre-transplant T-CD4+ lymphocyte count was 436 cells/mm3. The mean length of hospital stay after transplantation was 16.8 days. One patient presented precocious vena cava thrombosis; another had stenosis of cavocaval anastomosis leading to refractory ascites, renal failure and post-transplant graft dysfunction, and another presented stenosis of choledochal anastomosis. Immunosuppression and prophylaxis were used according to standard protocols, and there were no differences in the profile of infections or rejection after liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

This case series documents good survival and usual transplant procedures for confirmed HIV cases.

Long-term Outcomes Following Kidney and Liver Transplant in Recipients With HIV

Importance

Kidney transplant (KT) and liver transplant (LT) in HIV-positive patients have become more widely adopted. Data looking at long-term outcomes of patient and graft survival are lacking.

Objective

To compare the long-term outcomes of KT and LT in HIV-positive recipients with matched HIV-negative recipients.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Retrospective, single-center, cohort, study using data from 2000 to 2019. Patients were observed until death, or graft failure requiring retransplant. All HIV-positive patients who underwent KT and/or LT between 2000 and 2019 were included. Propensity matching was performed to the corresponding HIV-negative cohort, which was obtained from the University of California, San Francisco's transplant recipient registry. The data were analyzed from 2020 to 2021.

Exposures

HIV infection.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patient and graft survival for KT and patient survival for LT. Incidence of acute rejection and its association with KT graft survival.

Results

For KT, 655 HIV-negative recipients (mean [SD] age, 52.3 [13.6] years; 450 [68.7%] were men) and 119 HIV-positive recipients (mean [SD] age, 51.7 [9.4] years; 86 [72.3%] were men) were included. Patient survival was 79.6% (95% CI, 73.6%-86.1%) and 53.6% (95% CI, 38.9%-74.0%) at 15 years posttransplant, respectively. Graft survival was 57.0% (95% CI, 47.8%-68.0%) and 75.0% (95% CI, 65.3%-86.2%) at 15 years posttransplant, respectively. Diagnosis of HIV was not associated with worse graft survival (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.61-1.97; P = .77). For LT, 80 HIV-positive recipients (mean [SD] age, 52.6 [8.2] years; 53 [66.3%] were men) and 440 HIV-negative recipients (mean [SD] age, 54.6 [12.8] years; 291 [66.1%] were men) were included. Patient survival was 75.7% (95% CI, 71.8%-79.8%) for HIV-negative LT recipients and 70.0% (95% CI, 60.6%-80.8%) for HIV-positive LT recipients at 15 years posttransplant. Diagnosis of HIV was not a statistically significant predictor of patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.83-2.24; P = .22). In KT, HIV-positive patients with at least 1 episode of acute rejection had a graft survival of 52.8% (95% CI, 38.4%-72.5%; P < .001) at 15 years posttransplant, compared with 91.8% in those without AR.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this single-center cohort study, KT and LT in HIV-positive patients had comparable long-term outcomes with those in matched HIV-negative patients. The high incidence of acute rejection was associated with reduced graft survival. The findings support providing transplant to HIV-positive patients, which may be an appropriate use of transplant resources and provides equitable access for HIV-positive patients.

HIV in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to describe recent developments in renal transplantation for HIV-positive recipients, especially the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) trial results.

RECENT FINDINGS

HOPE trial data show that HIV-positive D+/R+ results are excellent and similar to D-/R+ in patients controlled on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Patients coinfected with hepatitis C or B virus now have effective treatment available. As pretransplant evaluation and post-transplant management is more complex in HIV-positive individuals early referral is important and coordination of evaluation and care with an infectious disease specialist is critical. HIV coordinated care services should be involved for best outcomes. HIV-positive renal transplant recipients have an increased risk of rejection and evidence suggests that standard lymphocyte depletion induction and maintenance immunosuppression be employed. Cardiovascular risk reduction and surveillance and attention to metabolic bone disease are important for HIV-positive renal transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

HIV-positive to HIV-positive renal transplantation has been established as well tolerated and successful. Further efforts are needed to expand access to transplantation in this population.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/MOT/A29.

Early steps to kidney transplantation among persons with HIV and end-stage renal disease in ESRD network 6

INTRODUCTION

End-stage renal disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in persons with HIV (PWH). Limited data exist on access to kidney transplantation for this population.

METHODS

A dataset inclusive of incident dialysis patients between 2012 and 2016 with follow-up through December 2017 that identifies PWH and the general dialysis population of Network 6 (Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina) was created through merging the United States Renal Data System with the southeastern early transplant access registry. Early steps to kidney transplantation and patient and dialysis facility-level characteristics that serve as barriers to transplantation were described.

RESULTS

Twenty-three thousand four hundred fourteen patients were identified; 469 were PWH. Compared to non-HIV individuals, PWH were younger (49 vs. 58 years, p < 0.001), predominantly Black (87% vs. 56% p < 0.001) and male (72% vs. 56% p < 0.001). PWH were less likely to be referred to kidney transplant within 1 year of starting dialysis (36% vs. 41% p < 0.001) and waitlisted within 1 year of evaluation-start (14% vs. 30%, p = 0.05). PWH (vs. non-PWH) waited longer for referral, evaluation-start, and waitlisting and in multivariable analysis; HIV positivity was associated with a lower probability of referral (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.70; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.62-0.80), evaluation (HR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55-0.80), and waitlisting (HR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.20-0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted interventions are needed to improve access to kidney transplants, particularly in waitlisting, for PWH.

Viral infections in lung transplantation

Viral infections account for up to 30% of all infectious complications in lung transplant recipients, remaining a significant cause of morbidity and even mortality. Impact of viral infections is not only due to the direct effects of viral replication, but also to immunologically-mediated lung injury that may lead to acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. This has particularly been seen in infections caused by herpesviruses and respiratory viruses. The implementation of universal preventive measures against cytomegalovirus (CMV) and influenza (by means of antiviral prophylaxis and vaccination, respectively) and administration of early antiviral treatment have reduced the burden of these diseases and potentially their role in affecting allograft outcomes. New antivirals against CMV for prophylaxis and for treatment of antiviral-resistant CMV infection are currently being evaluated in transplant recipients, and may continue to improve the management of CMV in lung transplant recipients. However, new therapeutic and preventive strategies are highly needed for other viruses such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) or parainfluenza virus (PIV), including new antivirals and vaccines. This is particularly important in the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, for which several unanswered questions remain, in particular on the best antiviral and immunomodulatory regimen for decreasing mortality specifically in lung transplant recipients. In conclusion, the appropriate management of viral complications after transplantation remain an essential step to continue improving survival and quality of life of lung transplant recipients.

Advancing organ transplantation through HIV-to-HIV transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Persons living with HIV (PLWH) have a life expectancy that is nearly equivalent to the general population, and thus are facing health conditions associated with normal aging as well as long-term HIV infection. End-organ disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and solid organ transplantation (SOT) may be a viable option for many PLWH. We review the history and recent updates in SOT in PLWH, specifically focusing on HIV-to-HIV transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Following promising data out of South Africa and to expand the donor pool, the United States passed the HIV Organ Procurement Equity (HOPE) Act, allowing for HIV-to-HIV SOT. Preliminary data to date, especially in HIV-to-HIV kidney transplantation, suggest overall excellent patient and graft survival outcomes with no HIV breakthrough infection.

SUMMARY

Preliminary HIV D+R+ SOT data to date suggest promising patient outcomes and no significant adverse events to recipients or living donors. This is an important step in expanding the donor pool and increasing opportunity for SOT in PLWH.

HIV transmission through living donor kidney transplant: An 11-year follow-up on the recipient and donor

HIV transmission via solid organ transplant is a rare but serious complication. Here, we describe long-term outcomes in a case of living donor-derived transmission of HIV in a kidney transplant recipient. After 11 years since transplant surgery, the donor shows no evidence of abnormal renal function, while the recipient continues to have a functioning graft. HIV is well controlled in both individuals. This single case report highlights the possibility of acceptable long-term outcomes in living kidney donors with HIV as well as in donor-derived HIV transmission to kidney transplant recipients.

Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide combination in the management of kidney transplant patients with HIV receiving immunosuppressants

We report here a drug-drug interaction with tacrolimus in a HIV-positive patient with renal transplant, after switch from highly active antiretroviral therapy with boosted protease inhibitors to the combination bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide. Although the tacrolimus doses were adapted to take account of the pharmacokinetic interactions with protease inhibitors, a tacrolimus overdosage occurred in the patient nonetheless. Through this case report, we highlight the need to consider a sufficient timeframe of withdrawal of protease inhibitors, which induce a prolonged drug-drug interaction with tacrolimus. To conclude, we purport that the combination bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide could be an attractive alternative in the context of transplantation provided a discontinuation of boosted protease inhibitors for more than 48 hours before introducing tacrolimus.

The first report of kidney transplantation in a human immunodeficiency virus-positive recipient in Thailand and literature review: Encouragement for developing countries in Southeast Asia

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection are at risk of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Human immunodeficiency virus infection impedes patients' accessibility to transplantation in Thailand and other developing countries in Southeast Asia, where the burdens of human immunodeficiency virus infection and chronic kidney disease are rapidly increasing. We report the successful kidney transplantation in a human immunodeficiency virus-positive recipient in Thailand and provide brief information about the current knowledge of human immunodeficiency virus medicine and transplantation that are needed for conducting kidney transplantations in such patients. Patient selection and evaluation, the choice of antiretroviral therapy, immunosuppressive regimens, and infectious complications are reviewed and discussed. The aim is to encourage kidney transplantation in end-stage renal disease patients with well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus infection, especially in countries where the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection is high and the accessibility to transplantation is still limited.

HIV and Solid Organ Transplantation: A 15-Year Retrospective Audit at a Tertiary Australian Transplant Centre

BACKGROUND

The incidence of end-stage organ disease in people living with HIV (PLWH) is increasing, as people live longer due to potent, tolerable antiretroviral therapy. Consequently, the number of PLWH who would benefit from solid organ transplant (SOT) is rising. Solid organ transplantation experience in PLWH in Australia remains limited. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review the outcomes for SOT in PLWH in Victoria, Australia.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of PLWH undergoing SOT over a 15-year period was performed. Adult PLWH over 18 years of age were eligible and identified from the Victorian HIV Service database. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise baseline demographics and clinical data, and outcomes following SOT.

RESULTS

Nine virologically-suppressed PLWH underwent SOT from HIV-negative donors; 5 kidneys, 2 livers, and 2 bilateral sequential lung transplants. All patients were male, with a median age of 57.3 years (IQR 54.3-60.1), CD4 count of 485 (IQR 342-835) at transplantation, and comorbidities were common at baseline. After a median follow up of 3.9 years (IQR 2.7-7.6), 8 (89%) patents were alive, 7 (78%) had functioning grafts, though 5 (56%) experienced organ rejection. Infections were common. Two patients required modification to their antiretroviral therapy due to significant drug-drug interactions, prior to transplant, while 5 (56%) had modifications post-SOT. No patients experienced HIV virologic failure.

CONCLUSION

PLWH with end-stage organ disease experience good clinical and functional outcomes, and should be considered for SOT where indicated. However, multidisciplinary planning and care is essential to optomise care in this patient group. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Retrospective-prospective study of safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antivirals in HIV/HCV-coinfected participants with decompensated liver disease pre- or post-liver transplant

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has transformed the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C (HCV) coinfected patients with advanced liver disease. STOP-Coinfection was a multicenter prospective and retrospective, open-label study using sofosbuvir-based DAA therapy to treat HIV/HCV-coinfected participants pre- or post-liver transplant (LT). Sixty-eight participants with end-stage liver disease (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score ≥7 and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score 6-29) were enrolled, 26 had hepatocellular carcinoma. Forty-two participants were treated pre-LT and 26 post-LT. All participants completed therapy without need for dose reduction or transfusion; eight required two or more courses of therapy. Ninety-three percent achieved a sustained virologic response and DAA therapy was well tolerated. Despite HCV cure, 12 end-stage liver disease participants required subsequent LT, 7 for decompensated liver disease. Thirteen participants died, 10 with decompensated liver disease pre-LT and three post-LT. Overall, transplant free survival was 42.8% at 4 years and post-LT survival was 87.9% at 5 years. We conclude that sofosbuvir-based DAA therapy is safe and highly effective in HCV-HIV patients with decompensated liver disease and post-LT, with post-LT survival rates comparable to other indications. This removes one of the last barriers to liver transplantation in this challenging cohort of recipients.

Tacrolimus, Sirolimus and Everolimus Doses in HIV-Infected Solid-Organ Recipients, Requiring a Cobicistat-Based Antiretroviral Regimen: Report of Three Cases and Review

People living with HIV should be considered candidates for solid-organ transplantation (SOT). However, managing HIV-infected patients undergoing SOT represents a major challenge due to the potential drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and immunosuppressive agents, particularly when resorting to antiretroviral drugs that require pharmacokinetic enhancers. We report three cases of cobicistat-tacrolimus co-administration, two of which also include the co-administration of mTOR inhibitors, in HIV-positive patients undergoing SOT (2 kidney and 1 liver recipient). We review previously reported cases and provide recommendations for initial management following transplantation.

The current status of virus-positive liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The last 2 years have seen significant developments in virus-positive liver transplantation. This review provides an updated account of the transplantation of hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV-positive livers, with a specific focus on studies published in the last 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of highly efficacious direct acting antiviral agents, nucleos(t)ide analogues and a continued organ shortage have led to the well tolerated utilization of HCV, HBV and HIV-positive organs. There has been a significant increase in the transplantation of HCV seropositive and NAT+ organs into HCV-negative recipients, without compromising patient or graft survival. Early reports of HBV core antibody (HBVcAb), HBV surface antigen (HBVsAg) positive and NAT+ donors are growing in the USA with promising results. Similarly, small studies have described the use of HIV-positive to HIV-positive liver transplantation without concerns for superinfection.

SUMMARY

HCV, HBV and HIV-positive liver transplantations can be accomplished safely and are associated with equivalent outcomes when paired with appropriate recipients. The practice of virus positive liver transplantation should be encouraged to combat the ongoing organ shortage.

Early steroid withdrawal in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients: Utilization and outcomes

Kidney transplant (KT) outcomes for HIV-infected (HIV+) persons are excellent, yet acute rejection (AR) is common and optimal immunosuppressive regimens remain unclear. Early steroid withdrawal (ESW) is associated with AR in other populations, but its utilization and impact are unknown in HIV+ KT. Using SRTR, we identified 1225 HIV+ KT recipients between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017, without AR, graft failure, or mortality during KT admission, and compared those with ESW with those with steroid continuation (SC). We quantified associations between ESW and AR using multivariable logistic regression and interval-censored survival analysis, as well as with graft failure and mortality using Cox regression, adjusting for donor, recipient, and immunologic factors. ESW utilization was 20.4%, with more zero HLA mismatch (8% vs 4%), living donors (26% vs 20%), and lymphodepleting induction (64% vs 46%) compared to the SC group. ESW utilization varied widely across 129 centers, with less use at high- versus moderate-volume centers (6% vs 21%, P < .001). AR was more common with ESW by 1 year (18.4% vs 12.3%; aOR: _1.08 1.61_2.41 , P = .04) and over the study period (aHR: _1.02 1.39_1.90 , P = .03), without difference in death-censored graft failure (aHR _0.60 0.91_1.36 , P = .33) or mortality (aHR: _0.75 1.15_1.77 , P = .45). To reduce AR after HIV+ KT, tailoring of ESW utilization is reasonable.

Heart transplantation candidacy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Timely referral of eligible candidates for consideration of advanced therapies, such as a heart transplantation or mechanical circulatory support is essential. The characteristics of heart transplantation candidates have changed significantly over the years, leading to a more complex evaluation process. The present review summarizes recent advances in the evaluation process for heart transplantation eligibility.

RECENT FINDINGS

The heart transplantation allocation policy was recently reviewed in the USA in an effort to reduce waitlist mortality and to ensure fair geographic allocation of organs to the sickest patients. Moreover, patients with chronic infectious diseases, as well as malignancies, are being currently considered acceptable candidates for transplantation. Listing practices for heart transplantation vary between programmes, with a greater willingness to consider high-risk candidates at higher-volume centres.

SUMMARY

The ultimate decision to place high-risk candidates on the heart transplantation waitlist should be based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative data analysis informed by clinical judgement, and the chronic shortage of organ donors makes this process an important ethical concern for any society. Future guidelines should discuss approaches to achieve fair organ allocation while preserving improved outcomes after transplantation.

HIV and organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the advances that have occurred over the past 2 years in organ transplantation in the setting of HIV.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although HIV+ organ transplantation is both safe and effective, recent studies show that HIV+ patients continue to experience barriers to transplantation. In the United States, the HOPE Act is not only expected to increase the donor pool for HIV+ transplant candidates, but to also allow for the use of donors with false-positive HIV+ tests, which had previously been banned under the US National Organ Transplant Act. More effective HCV treatment, increased experience with heart and lung transplantation and the potential for increased organ availability with the inclusion of HIV+ organ donors have provided for significant advances in the care of these patients.

SUMMARY

There continues to be progress in the field of organ transplantation in persons living with HIV. Future efforts should continue aiming to limit barriers to transplantation and improving the understanding of immunologic derangements seen in transplant recipients with HIV infection.

Incidence and Outcomes of COVID-19 in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients With HIV: Report From the National HOPE in Action Consortium

BACKGROUND

Transplant recipients with HIV may have worse outcomes with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to impaired T-cell function coupled with immunosuppressive drugs. Alternatively, immunosuppression might reduce inflammatory complications and/or antiretrovirals could be protective.

METHODS

Prospective reporting of all cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection was required within the HOPE in Action Multicenter Consortium, a cohort of kidney and liver transplant recipients with HIV who have received organs from donors with and without HIV at 32 transplant centers in the United States.

RESULTS

Between March 20, 2020 and September 25, 2020, there were 11 COVID-19 cases among 291 kidney and liver recipients with HIV (4%). In those with COVID-19, median age was 59 y, 10 were male, 8 were kidney recipients, and 5 had donors with HIV. A higher proportion of recipients with COVID-19 compared with the overall HOPE in the Action cohort were Hispanic (55% versus 12%) and received transplants in New York City (73% versus 34%, P < 0.05). Most (10/11, 91%) were hospitalized. High-level oxygen support was required in 7 and intensive care in 5; 1 participant opted for palliative care instead of transfer to the intensive care unit. HIV RNA was undetectable in all. Median absolute lymphocyte count was 0.3 × 103 cells/μL. Median CD4 pre-COVID-19 was 298 cells/μL, declining to <200 cells/μl in 6/7 with measurements on admission. Treatment included high-dose steroids (n = 6), tocilizumab (n = 3), remdesivir (n = 2), and convalescent plasma (n = 2). Four patients (36%) died.

CONCLUSIONS

Within a national prospective cohort of kidney and liver transplant recipients with HIV, we report high mortality from COVID-19.

Experience with a six-month regimen of Pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis in 122 HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

Anti-Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis is recommended for 3 to 6 months post-transplant in HIV-negative kidney transplant recipients. For HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients, there is no definite duration of primary prophylaxis and is often prescribed life-long. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of PCP in HIV-positive recipients who received 6 months of prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or an alternative agent. One hundred and twenty-two HIV-positive recipients received a kidney transplant from 2001 to 2017 at Hahnemann University Hospital. Most patients received induction immunosuppression with an IL-2 receptor antagonist, with or without intravenous immunoglobulin. Only one patient received anti-thymocyte globulin. Maintenance immunosuppression included a calcineurin-inhibitor (tacrolimus or cyclosporine), an antiproliferative agent (mycophenolate or sirolimus), and prednisone. Mean CD4 cell count was 461 ± 127 cells/uL prior to transplant and 463 ± 229 cells/μL at 6 to 12 months after transplant. None of the recipients developed PCP after a median follow-up of 2.88 years (IQR 1.16-4.87). Based on our observation, a 6-month regimen of PCP prophylaxis may be sufficient among HIV-positive recipients, similar to those without HIV infection.