Pneumonia in solid organ transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

Efficacy and safety of carrimycin in ten patients with severe pneumonia following solid organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

The number of patients undergoing solid organ transplantation has increased annually. However, infections in solid organ transplant recipients can have a severe effect on patient survival owing to the continued use of immunosuppressants. Carrimycin is a novel macrolide antibiotic produced by genetically engineered streptomyces spiramyceticus harboring a 4''-O-isovaleryltransferase gene (ist) from streptomyces thermotoleran. Carrimycin has good antibacterial and antiviral effects. However, no relevant studies have been conducted on the efficacy and safety of carrimycin in patients with severe pneumonia (SP) after solid organ transplantation.

AIM

To explore the efficacy and safety of carrimycin in patients with SP after solid organ transplantation to provide a medication reference for clinical treatment.

METHODS

In March 2022, ten patients with SP following solid-organ transplantation were treated at our hospital between January 2021 and March 2022. When the condition was critical and difficult to control with other drugs, carrimycin was administered. These ten patients' clinical features and treatment protocols were retrospectively analyzed, and the efficacy and safety of carrimycin for treating SP following solid organ transplantation were evaluated.

RESULTS

All ten patients were included in the analysis. Regarding etiological agent detection, there were three cases of fungal pneumonia, two cases of bacterial pneumonia, two cases of Pneumocystis pneumonia, and three cases of mixed infections. After treatment with carrimycin, the disease in seven patients significantly improved, the course of the disease was significantly shortened, fever was quickly controlled, chest computed tomography was significantly improved, and oxygenation was significantly improved. Finally, the patients were discharged after curing. One patient died of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and two patients discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSION

Carrimycin is a safe and effective treatment modality for SP following solid organ transplantation. Carrimycin may have antibacterial and antiviral effects in patients with SP following solid organ transplantation.

Focus on Pneumonia After Organ Transplantation: Is There a Need for Specific Medical Care in the Emergency Department?

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia is a major cause of hospitalization and has a substantial impact on health care costs. Diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients remain a challenge for clinicians in the emergency department. This study aimed to evaluate demographic features, clinical patterns, history of hospitalization, and diagnosis of adult patients after organ(s) transplantation (liver, kidney, pancreas) with severe pneumonia requiring hospitalization. The aim is to determine whether patients undergoing SOT receive or require specific care and whether they need to be prioritized.

METHOD

This was a single-center observational study of adult patients after SOT with severe pneumonia requiring hospitalization. The data set for the analysis included only patients with pneumonia as the main reason for hospitalization. The diagnosis of pneumonia was suspected based on the American Thoracic Society criteria.

RESULTS

The study revealed that the standard of care for patients with a history of SOT did not significantly differ from care provided to the non-SOT patients with pneumonia admitted to the same hospital during a 94-week period.

CONCLUSION

There were notable differences, such as post-transplant patients being transferred more quickly to the hospital ward, having longer hospital stays, and receiving antibiotics earlier than the non-SOT group.

Validation of risk scores for prediction of severe pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

PURPOSE

Risk scores for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are widely used for standardized assessment in immunocompetent patients and to identify patients at risk for severe pneumonia and death. In immunocompromised patients, the prognostic value of pneumonia-specific risk scores seems to be reduced, but evidence is limited. The value of different pneumonia risk scores in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is not known.

METHODS

Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed 310 first CAP episodes after kidney transplantation in 310 KTR. We assessed clinical outcomes and validated eight different risk scores (CRB-65, CURB-65, DS-CRB-65, qSOFA, SOFA, PSI, IDSA/ATS minor criteria, NEWS-2) for the prognosis of severe pneumonia and in-hospital mortality. Risk scores were assessed up to 48 h after admission, but always before an endpoint occurred. Multiple imputation was performed to handle missing values.

RESULTS

In total, 16 out of 310 patients (5.2%) died, and 48 (15.5%) developed severe pneumonia. Based on ROC analysis, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and national early warning score 2 (NEWS-2) performed best, predicting severe pneumonia with AUC of 0.823 (0.747-0.880) and 0.784 (0.691-0.855), respectively.

CONCLUSION

SOFA and NEWS-2 are best suited to identify KTR at risk for the development of severe CAP. In contrast to immunocompetent patients, CRB-65 should not be used to guide outpatient treatment in KTR, since there is a 7% risk for the development of severe pneumonia even in patients with a score of zero.

Atypical pneumonia testing in transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of atypical pneumonia among immunocompromised patients is not well characterized. Establishing a diagnosis of atypical pneumonia is challenging as positive tests must be carefully interpreted. We aimed to assess the test positivity rate and incidence of atypical pneumonia in transplant recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Yale New Haven Health System in Connecticut. Adults with solid organ transplant, hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell, who underwent testing for atypical pathogens of pneumonia (Legionella pneumophilia, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Bordetella pertussis) between January 2016 and August 2022 were included. Positive results were adjudicated in a clinical context using pre-defined criteria. A cost analysis of diagnostic testing was performed.

RESULTS

Note that, 1021 unique tests for atypical pathogens of pneumonia were performed among 481 transplant recipients. The testing positivity rate was 0.7% (n = 7). After clinical adjudication, there were three cases of proven Legionella and one case of possible Mycoplasma infection. All cases of legionellosis were in transplant recipients within 1-year post-transplantation with recently augmented immunosuppression and lymphopenia. The possible case of Mycoplasma infection was in an HSCT recipient with augmented immunosuppression. The cost of all tests ordered was $50,797.73.

CONCLUSION

The positivity rate of tests for atypical pneumonia was very low in this transplant cohort. An algorithmic approach that targets testing for those with compatible host, clinical, radiographic, and epidemiologic factors, and provides guidance on test selection and test interpretation, may improve the diagnostic yield and lead to substantial cost savings.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in Immunocompromised Patients: Current State and Future Opportunities

Immunocompromised (IC) patients are high risk for complications due to a high rate of antibiotic exposure. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions targeted to IC patients can be challenging due to limited data in this population and a high risk of severe infection-related outcomes. Here, the authors review immunocompromised antimicrobial stewardship barriers, metrics, and opportunities for antimicrobial use and testing optimization. Last, the authors highlight future steps in the field.

Approach to suspected donor-derived infections

Prevention of donor-derived disease among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients requires judicious risk-benefit assessment. Comprehensive guidelines outline specific donor risk factors and post-transplant monitoring strategies to prevent and mitigate transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. However, elimination of unanticipated donor-derived infections remains challenging. The objectives of this review are to (1) define risk of anticipated vs. unanticipated disease transmission events in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients; (2) discuss donor presentations that confer greater risk of unanticipated disease transmission; (3) develop a matrix for consideration of donor acceptance; and (4) discuss limitations and future directions for donor screening. Although solid organ transplant confers inherent risk of infection transmission, the risk of significant disease transmission events may be mitigated by a comprehensive approach including donor assessment, consideration of recipient need, post-transplant monitoring, and early intervention.

Delayed Graft Function Among Kidney Transplant Recipients Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Urinary Tract Infection and BK Viremia

Background

Delayed graft function (DGF) among deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (DDKTRs) is a well-known risk factor for allograft rejection, decreased graft survival, and increased cost. Although DGF is associated with an increased risk of rejection, it is unclear whether it also increases the risk of infection.

Methods

We reviewed all adult DDKTRs at our center between 2010 and 2018. The primary outcomes of interest were BK viremia, cytomegalovirus viremia, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection (UTI) within the first year of transplant. Additional analysis was made with censoring follow-up at the time of allograft rejection.

Results

A total of 1512 DDKTRs were included, of whom 468 (31%) had DGF. As expected, several recipient, donor, and baseline immunological characteristics differed by DGF status. After adjustment, DGF was significantly associated with an increased risk of BK viremia (hazard ratio: 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.81; P = 0.049) and UTI (hazard ratio: 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.19; P < 0.001) but not cytomegalovirus viremia or pneumonia. Associations were similar in models censored at the time of rejection.

Conclusions

DGF is associated with an increased risk of early infectious complications, mainly UTI and BK viremia. Close monitoring and appropriate management are warranted for better outcomes in this unique population.

Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Infections in Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplant often is complicated by infections in the recipient from therapy-related and patient-related risk factors. Infections in kidney transplant recipients are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and allograft dysfunction. There is a predictable timeline after kidney transplant regarding the types of pathogens causing infections, reflecting the net state of immunosuppression. In the early post-transplant period, bacterial infections comprise two thirds of all infections, followed by viral and fungal infections. Infections occurring early after kidney transplantation are generally the result of postoperative complications. In most cases, opportunistic infections occur within 6 months after kidney transplantation. They may be caused by a new infection, a donor-derived infection, or reactivation of a latent infection. Community-acquired pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal infections are the most common infections in the late period after transplantation when the net immunosuppression is minimal. It is crucial to seek information on the time after transplant, reflecting the net state of immunosuppression, previous history of exposure/infections, geography, and seasonal outbreaks. It is imperative that we develop regionally specific guidelines on screening, prevention, and management of infections after kidney transplantation.

Pediatric Lung Transplant Outcomes Based on Immunosuppressive Regimen at Discharge: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Real-World Evidence From the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

This retrospective analysis of the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was undertaken to obtain real-world evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in pediatric lung transplant recipients to support a supplemental New Drug Application.

METHODS

Overall, 725 pediatric recipients of a primary deceased-donor lung transplant between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2017, were followed for up to 3 years post-transplant based on an immunosuppressive regimen at hospital discharge: immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC)+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC+azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine (CsA)+MMF, or CsA+AZA. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of graft failure or death (all-cause) at 1 year post-transplant, calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The use of TAC+MMF increased over time. During 2010 to 2017, 91.7% of pediatric lung transplant recipients were receiving TAC+MMF at the time of discharge. The proportion of recipients continuing their discharge regimen at 1 year post-transplant was 83.7% with TAC+MMF and 40.4% to 59.7% with the other regimens. Cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint of graft failure or death at 1 year post-transplant was 7.7% with TAC+MMF, 13.9% with TAC+AZA, 8.9% with CsA+MMF, and 9.1% with CsA+AZA. There was no significant difference in the risk of graft failure or death at 1 year post-transplant between groups from 1999 to 2005 (the only era when adequate numbers on each regimen allowed statistical comparison). No increase in hospitalization for infection or malignancy was seen with TAC+MMF.

CONCLUSION

The real-world evidence from the US database of transplant recipients supported the Food and Drug Administration's approval of tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric lung transplant recipients.

Association between Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and In-Hospital Mortality in Solid Organ Transplant Admissions: An Observational Analysis in Spain, 2004-2021

(1) Background: To analyze the association between hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and in-hospital mortality (IHM) during hospital admission for solid organ transplant in Spain during 2004-2021. (2) Methods: We used national hospital discharge data to select all hospital admissions for kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplants. We stratified the data according to HAP status. To examine time trends, we grouped data into three consecutive 6-year periods (2004-2009; 2010-2015; and 2016-2021). We assessed in-hospital mortality (IHM) in logistic regression analyses and obtained odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). (3) Results: We identified a total of 71,827 transplants (45,262, kidney; 18,127, liver; 4734, heart; and 4598, lung). Two thirds of the patients were men. Overall, the rate of HAP during admission was 2.6% and decreased from 3.0% during 2004-2009 to 2.4% during 2016-2021. The highest rate of HAP corresponded to lung transplant (9.4%), whereas we found the lowest rate for kidney transplant (1.1%). Rates of HAP for liver and heart transplants were 3.8% and 6.3%, respectively. IHM was significantly lower during 2016-2021 compared to 2004-2009 for all types of transplants (ORs (CIs) = 0.65 (0.53-0.79) for kidney; 0.73 (0.63-0.84) for liver; 0.72 (0.59-0.87) for heart; and 0.39 (0.31-0.47) for lung). HAP was associated with IHM for all types of transplants (ORs (CIs) = 4.47 (2.85-9.08) for kidney; 2.96 (2.34-3.75) for liver; 1.86 (1.34-2.57) for heart; and 2.97 (2.24-3.94) for lung). (4) Conclusions: Rates of HAP during admission for solid organ transplant differ depending on the type of transplant. Although IHM during admission for solid organ transplant has decreased over time in our country, HAP persists and is associated with a higher IHM after accounting for potential confounding variables.

Opportunities for Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Although antimicrobial stewardship programs have excelled over the past decade, uptake and application of these programs to special populations such as solid organ transplant recipients have lagged. Here, we review the value of antimicrobial stewardship for transplant centers and highlight data supporting interventions that are ripe for adoption. In addition, we review the design of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives, targets for both syndromic and system-based interventions.

A Case Report of a Kidney Transplant Recipient With Organizing Pneumonia After Graft Loss

We present a case of a 68-year-old male patient who underwent ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation from his wife because of immunoglobulin A nephropathy 13 years ago. Over time, the patient showed a gradual decline in graft function and required reinitiation of hemodialysis because of fluid overload, which led to his admission to our hospital. An arteriovenous fistula was created, and subsequently, hemodialysis therapy was started. Because he had chronic cytomegalovirus retinopathy and thrombotic microangiopathy due to immunosuppressive therapy at admission, mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus were discontinued during hemodialysis initiation. Only low-dose prednisolone was continued. One week later, the patient had a fever, and chest computed tomography revealed bilateral pneumonia, which was not improved by antibiotics. The patient was diagnosed with organized pneumonia. After ruling out opportunistic infection, including pneumocystis pneumonia, increased doses of prednisolone resulted in the remission of organizing pneumonia.

Evaluation of BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Samples From Immunocompromised Patients With Suspected Pneumonia

Objectives Immunocompromised patients, specifically those with solid organ transplants or cancer on chemotherapy, are at particularly high risk of severe pneumonia and opportunistic infections. In select patients, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is performed to provide high-quality samples for analysis. We compare BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States), a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, with standard of care diagnostics in BAL samples from immunocompromised patients to identify opportunities for this test to affect clinical decision making. Methods Patients hospitalized with pneumonia based on clinical and radiographic findings who underwent evaluation with bronchoscopy between May 2019 to January 2020 were reviewed. Among those patients undergoing bronchoscopy, those who were immunocompromised were selected for inclusion in the study. BAL specimens submitted to the microbiology laboratory were chosen based on as part of the internal validation of the panel in comparison with sputum culture at our hospitals. We compared the outcomes of the multiplex PCR assay with traditional culture methods and evaluated the role of PCR assay in de-escalating antimicrobial therapy. Results Twenty-four patients were identified for testing with the multiplex PCR assay. Of the 24 patients, 16 were immunocompromised, all with solid or hematological malignancy or a history of organ transplant. Seventeen individual BAL samples from the 16 patients were reviewed. BAL culture results and the multiplex PCR assay were in agreement in 13 samples (76.5%). In four cases, the multiplex PCR assay identified a possible causative pathogen not detected by standard workup. The median time to de-escalation of antimicrobials was three days (interquartile range (IQR) 2-4) from the day of collection of the BAL samples. Conclusions Studies have established the additive role of multiplex PCR testing in addition to traditional diagnostic tools like sputum culture in diagnosing the etiology of pneumonia. Limited data exist specifically looking at immunocompromised patients, in whom a timely and accurate diagnosis is particularly important. There is a potential benefit for performing multiplex PCR assays as an additive diagnostic tool in BAL samples for these patients.

Immunocompromised Host Pneumonia: Definitions and Diagnostic Criteria: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report

Pneumonia imposes a significant clinical burden on people with immunocompromising conditions. Millions of individuals live with compromised immunity because of cytotoxic cancer treatments, biological therapies, organ transplants, inherited and acquired immunodeficiencies, and other immune disorders. Despite broad awareness among clinicians that these patients are at increased risk for developing infectious pneumonia, immunocompromised people are often excluded from pneumonia clinical guidelines and treatment trials. The absence of a widely accepted definition for immunocompromised host pneumonia is a significant knowledge gap that hampers consistent clinical care and research for infectious pneumonia in these vulnerable populations. To address this gap, the American Thoracic Society convened a workshop whose participants had expertise in pulmonary disease, infectious diseases, immunology, genetics, and laboratory medicine, with the goal of defining the entity of immunocompromised host pneumonia and its diagnostic criteria.

Impact of a Dedicated Pretransplant Infectious Disease Consultation on Respiratory Tract Infections in Kidney Allograft Recipients: A Retrospective Study of 516 Recipients

BACKGROUND

Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a leading cause of death after kidney transplant. Preventive strategies may be implemented during a dedicated infectious disease consultation (IDC) before transplantation. Impact of IDC on RTIs after transplant has not been determined.

METHODS

We conducted a monocentric retrospective cohort analysis including all kidney transplant recipients from January 2015 to December 2019. We evaluated the impact of IDC on RTIs and identified risk and protective factors associated with RTIs.

RESULTS

We included 516 kidney transplant recipients. Among these, 145 had an IDC before transplant. Ninety-five patients presented 123 RTIs, including 75 (61%) with pneumonia. Patient that benefited from IDC presented significantly less RTIs (p = 0.049). RTIs were an independent risk factor of mortality (HR = 3.64 (1.97-6.73)). Independent risk factors for RTIs included HIV (OR = 3.33 (1.43-7.74)) and HCV (OR = 3.76 (1.58-8.96)). IDC was identified as an independent protective factor (OR = 0.48 (0.26-0.88)). IDC prior to transplantation is associated with diminished RTIs and is an independent protective factor. RTIs after kidney transplant are an independent risk factor of death. Implementing systematic IDC may have an important impact on reducing RTIs and related morbidity and mortality.

Aetiology, clinical features, diagnostic studies, and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients admitted to hospital: a multicentre retrospective French cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the aetiology, clinical features, diagnostic studies and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in a French cohort of hospitalized kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multicentre study in kidney transplant recipients admitted to ten French centres for CAP from January 2016 to December 2018. CAP discharge diagnoses were clinically and radiologically validated. We assessed a descriptive analysis of all confirmed CAP including medical ward and intensive care unit admissions.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-five CAP episodes in 132 patients were included. Median time from transplantation to admission was 6.4 (interquartile range, 1.6-12.3) years, with corticosteroid exposure in 112/165 (67.9%) cases. Sputum culture was performed in 47/165 (28.5%) cases including 7/47 (14.9%) positive samples. Bronchoscopy was performed in 87/165 (52.7%) cases with pathogens identified in 39/87 (44.8%) cases. Microbiological studies led to identifying a respiratory pathogen in 64/165 (38.8%) CAP episodes including 11/64 (17.2%) polymicrobial cases. Among these 64 episodes, 75 microorganisms were identified; 46/75 (61.3%) were core respiratory pathogens and 29/75 (38.7%) were opportunistic or drug-resistant organisms including Pneumocystis jirovecii 9/75 (12%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 5/75 (6.7%), multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae 4/75 (5.3%), and Aspergillus 4/75 (5.3%). Patients required intensive care unit admission in 26/165 (15.8%) episodes, invasive ventilation in 20/165 (12.1%) cases, and 22/165 (13.3%) needed in-hospital dialysis.

DISCUSSION

CAP episodes occurred in kidney transplant recipients with a long history of immunosuppressive drug exposure. Diagnostic studies identified a microorganism in more than one-third of CAP episodes, including drug-resistant and opportunistic pathogens.

Shorter durations of antibiotic therapy in organ transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent evidence supports shorter courses of antibiotics for several common infections and prophylactic indications. Unfortunately, solid organ transplant patients are often underrepresented or excluded from these studies. As a result, prolonged antibiotic durations are often used in clinical practice despite a lack of demonstrable benefit. This paper reviews recent publications addressing antibiotic duration of therapy in SOT recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although largely limited to observational studies, longer courses of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis, urinary tract infections, and bloodstream infections have not demonstrated benefit compared to shorter courses. In some instances, longer courses of therapy have been associated with harm (i.e., adverse drug events and development of resistance).

SUMMARY

Although the data remains limited, findings from retrospective studies evaluating shorter courses of antibiotics in SOT patients is encouraging. More robust research is desperately needed to define the optimal duration of antibiotics for common infections in SOT patients.

Lung Transplant Outcomes in Adults in the United States: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Real-world Evidence from the SRTR

BACKGROUND

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was retrospectively analyzed to provide real-world evidence of the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens in adult lung transplant recipients in the United States.

METHODS

Adult recipients (N = 25 355; ≥18 y) of a primary deceased-donor lung transplant between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2017, were followed for 3 y posttransplant based on immunosuppressive regimen at discharge: immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC + azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine (CsA) + MMF, or CsA + AZA. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of graft failure or death (all-cause) at 1 y posttransplant (calculated via a modified Kaplan-Meier method).

RESULTS

Discharge immunosuppressive regimens in lung transplant recipients changed over time, with a substantial increase in the use of TAC + MMF. TAC + MMF was the most common immunosuppressive regimen (received by 61.0% of individuals at discharge). The cumulative incidence of graft failure or death at 1 y posttransplant in adult lung transplant patients receiving TAC + MMF was 8.6% (95% confidence interval 8.1-9.1). Risk of graft failure or death was significantly higher in adults receiving CsA + MMF or CsA + AZA compared with TAC + MMF, with no significant difference seen between TAC + MMF and TAC + AZA. TAC + MMF had the highest continued use at 1 y posttransplant (72.0% versus 35.4%-51.5% for the other regimens). There was no increase in the rate of infection or malignancy in the TAC + MMF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world evidence from the most comprehensive database of transplant recipients in the United States supports the use of TAC in combination with MMF or AZA as maintenance immunosuppression in adult lung transplant recipients.

The Association between Regulatory T Cell Subpopulations and Severe Pneumonia Post Renal Transplantation

Severe pneumonia accounts for the majority of morbidity and mortality in renal allograft recipients due to immunosuppressant maintenance. Regulatory T cells (Tregs), which are involved in tackling infections under immunosuppressive conditions, are rarely uncovered. We aimed to investigate the relationship between various Treg subpopulations and severe pneumonia after kidney transplantation (KTx). KTx recipients with pneumonia were divided into severe pneumonia and mild pneumonia groups. The frequencies and absolute numbers (Ab No.) of total Tregs (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+), six subsets of Tregs (Helios+/-, CD39+/-, and CD45RA+/-), and T cells, B cells, and NK cells were assessed from peripheral blood via flow cytometry using the $t$ or Mann-Whitney test and receiver operating curve analysis. We also determined the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of human leukocyte antigen- (HLA-) DR on monocytes and CD64 on neutrophils. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors of disease progression, and Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed to identify relationships between the measured immune indices and patients’ clinical information. Our research indicated that Treg subpopulations were strongly associated with severe pneumonia progression post KTx. Based on the monitoring of Treg subpopulations, better-individualized prevention and therapy might be achieved for patients with severe pneumonia post KTx.

Bacterial and Viral Infection and Sepsis in Kidney Transplanted Patients

Kidney transplanted patients are a unique population with intrinsic susceptibility to viral and bacterial infections, mainly (but not exclusively) due to continuous immunosuppression. In this setting, infectious episodes remain among the most important causes of death, with different risks according to the degree of immunosuppression, time after transplantation, type of infection, and patient conditions. Prevention, early diagnosis, and appropriate therapy are the goals of infective management, taking into account that some specific characteristics of transplanted patients may cause a delay (the absence of fever or inflammatory symptoms, the negativity of serological tests commonly adopted for the general population, or the atypical anatomical presentation depending on the surgical site and graft implantation). This review considers the recent available findings of the most common viral and bacterial infection in kidney transplanted patients and explores risk factors and outcomes in septic evolution.

The Expansion of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Correlates With the Severity of Pneumonia in Kidney Transplant Patients

Background

Pneumonia is one of the most frequent but serious infectious complications post kidney transplantation. Severe pneumonia induces sustained immunosuppression, but few parameters concerning immune status are used to assess the severity of pneumonia. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are induced under infection and have the strong immunosuppressive capacity, but the correlation between MDSCs and pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is unknown.

Methods

Peripheral blood MDSCs were longitudinally detected in 58 KTRs diagnosed with pneumonia using flow cytometry and in 29 stable KTRs as a control. The effectors of MDSCs were detected in the plasma. Spearman's rank correlation analysis was performed to determine the correlation between MDSCs and the severity of pneumonia as well as lymphopenia.

Results

The frequency of MDSCs and effectors, including arginase-1, S100A8/A9, and S100A12, were significantly increased in the pneumonia group compared with the stable group. CD11b⁺CD14⁺HLA-DR^low/−CD15⁻ monocytic-MDSCs (M-MDSCs) were higher in the pneumonia group but showed no significant difference between the severe and non-severe pneumonia subgroups. CD11b⁺CD14⁻CD15⁺ low-density granulocytic-MDSCs (G-MDSCs) were specifically increased in the severe pneumonia subgroup and correlated with the severity of pneumonia as well as lymphopenia. During the study period of 2 weeks, the frequencies of MDSCs and G-MDSCs were persistently increased in the severe pneumonia subgroup.

Conclusions

MDSCs and G-MDSCs were persistently increased in KTRs with pneumonia. G-MDSCs were correlated with the severity of pneumonia and could thus be an indicator concerning immune status for assessing pneumonia severity.

Assessment of mechanisms of infectious pneumonia based on expression of fibrinogen, procalcitonin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein expression, T helper 17 cells, regulatory T cells interleukin-10, and interleukin-17

BACKGROUND

Infectious pneumonia is one of the important causes of neonatal death that can lead to the imbalance of T helper 17 cells (Th17) and T regulatory T cells (Treg) cells. The correlation between plasma fibrinogen (FIB), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Th17/Treg-IL-10/IL-17 axis balance and their specific role in the occurrence and development of infectious pneumonia are not completely clear.

METHODS

Thirty specific-pathogen free Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into a control group for comparison and IPN model group. After the establishment of infectious pneumonia model, levels of FIB, PCT, hs-CRP, IL-10, and IL-17 in the serum of the two groups were measured using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the pathological changes of lung tissue were observed using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, the number of Treg and Th17 cells and the ratio of Th17/Treg in serum were detected using flow cytometry, and the levels of retinoic acid-related orphan receptor γt and forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) in lung tissue were detected using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blot.

RESULTS

The results showed that the serum levels of FIB, PCT, hs-CRP, Th17 cell number, Th17/Treg ratio, left lung dry and wet weight, lung tissue wet/dry ratio, lung pathology score and IL-17 level in the model group were significantly higher than those in the control group, while the number of Treg cells and the level of IL-10 in the model group were significantly lower than those in the control group. In addition, the expression of Foxp3mRNA and protein in lung tissue of model group decreased significantly, while the expression level of ROR- γ t mRNA and protein increased.

CONCLUSIONS

In infectious pneumonia, the expression levels of FIB, PCT and hs-CRP are up-regulated, and Th17 cells are activated, Treg cells are inhibited, proinflammatory cytokine IL-17 expression is up-regulated, anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 expression is down-regulated, resulting in increased inflammatory response, thus promoting the occurrence and development of infectious pneumonia.

Posttransplant Pneumonia Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Followed in Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVES

Pneumonia is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant recipients. We studied the demographic characteristics, respiratory management, and outcomes of solid-organ transplant recipients with pneumonia in an intensive care unit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There have been 2857 kidney, 687 liver, and 142 heart transplants performed between October 16, 1985, and February 28, 2021, at our center. We retrospectively analyzed records for 51 of 193 recipients with pneumonia during the posttransplant period between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018.

RESULTS

Fifty-one of 193 recipients were followed in the intensive care unit. Mean age was 45.4 ± 16.6 years among 42 male (82.4%) and 9 female (17.6%) recipients. Twenty-six patients (51%) underwent kidney transplant, 14 (27.5%) liver transplant, 7 (13.7%) heart transplant, and 4 (7.8%) combined kidney and liver transplant. Most pneumonia episodes occurred 6 months after transplant (70.6%) with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System II score was 18.9 ± 7.7, and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 8.5 ± 3.9 at intensive care unit admission. Whereas 66.7% of pneumonia cases were nosocomial acquired, 33.3% were community acquired. The intensive care unit and 28-day mortality rates were 39.2% and 64.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Solid-organ transplant recipients with pneumonia have been associated with poor prognosis. Our cohort followed in the intensive care unit comprised mostly patients with nosocomial pneumonia with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, hospitalized 6 months after transplant with high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System II scores predictive of mortality. In this high-risk patient group, careful follow-up, early discovery of warning signs, and rapid treatment initiation could improve the outcomes in the intensive care unit.

Management and prophylaxis of bacterial and mycobacterial infections among lung transplant recipients

Bacterial and mycobacterial infections are associated with morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Infectious complications are categorized by timing post-transplant: <1, 1–6, and >6 months. The first month post-transplant is associated with the highest risk of infection. During this period, infections are most commonly healthcare-associated, and include infections related to surgical complications. The lungs and bloodstream are common sites of infections. Common healthcare-associated organisms include methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Gram-negative bacilli such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Clostridioides difficile. More than 1-month post-transplant, opportunistic infections can occur. Tuberculosis occurs in 0.8–10% of lung transplant recipients which reflects variation in background prevalence. The majority of post-transplant tuberculosis stems from reactivation of untreated or undiagnosed latent tuberculosis. Most post-transplant tuberculosis occurs in the lungs and develops within a year of transplant. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria commonly colonize the lungs of lung transplant candidates and are often hard to eradicate even with prolonged courses of antimycobacterial agents. Drug interactions between antimycobacterial agents and calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors also complicates treatment post-transplant. Given that infection adversely impacts outcomes after lung transplant, and that anti-infective therapy is often less effective after transplant, infection prevention is key to long-term success. A comprehensive approach that includes pre-transplant evaluation, perioperative prophylaxis, long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis, immunization, and safer living at home and in the community, should be employed to minimize the risk of infection.

Management of Antimicrobial Agents in Abdominal Organ Transplant Patients in Intensive Care Unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Early diagnosis of infections and immediate initiation of appropriate antimicrobials are crucial in the management of patients before and after organ transplantation. We reviewed the most recent literature and guidelines in this field and organized the current recommendations for healthcare professionals caring for critically ill organ transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms is increasing. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria comprise about 14% of organisms. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infections are also on the rise, as 20.5% of nosocomial enterococci are now vancomycin-resistant, changing empiric antibiotic selection. Fluconazole-resistant Candida species comprise up to 46% of cases of candidemia in hospitalized patients. Consequently, new guidelines recommend primary use of echinocandins in patients with candidemia who have moderate-to-severe disease. Finally, the incidence of emergence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infection in patients is 5-12%, requiring early recognition and change to alternative regimens in the case of poor response to therapy.

SUMMARY

Bloodstream infections are a major cause of mortality and morbidity in solid organ transplantation. Mortality as high as 24% and 50% have been reported with sepsis and septic shock respectively. As such, bloodstream infections should be diagnosed rapidly and intravenous antibiotics should be started immediately. Appropriate resuscitation should be initiated and the number and/or dose of immunosuppressive drugs should be reduced. Proper source control must also be achieved with radiologic drainage or surgical intervention as appropriate. Initial antibiotic treatment of these patients should cover both Gram-positive organisms, especially in the presence of intravascular catheters, and Gram-negative bacteria. Echinocandins like caspofungin should also be considered especially in critically ill patients, particularly if a patient has been on total parenteral nutrition or broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Pneumonia in solid organ transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These guidelines from the AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice review the diagnosis and management of pneumonia in the post-transplant period. Clinical presentations and differential diagnosis for pneumonia in the solid organ transplant recipient are reviewed. A two-tier approach is proposed based on the net state of immunosuppression and the severity of presentation. With a lower risk of opportunistic, hospital-acquired, or exposure-specific pathogens and a non-severe presentation, empirical therapy may be initiated under close clinical observation. In all other patients, or those not responding to the initial therapy, a more aggressive diagnostic approach including sampling of tissue for microbiological and pathological testing is warranted. Given the broad range of potential pathogens, a microbiological diagnosis is often key for optimal care. Given the limited literature comparatively evaluating diagnostic approaches to pneumonia in the solid organ transplant recipient, much of the proposed diagnostic algorithm reflects clinical experience rather than evidence-based data. It should serve as a template which may be modified according to local needs. The same holds true for the suggested empiric therapies, which need to be adapted to the local resistance patterns. Further study is needed to comparatively evaluate diagnostic and empiric treatment strategies in SOT recipients.