PRAME Immunohistochemistry of Spitzoid Neoplasms

The combined diagnostic value of 5-hmC and PRAME immunohistochemistry in melanocytic neoplasms

The diagnosis of melanocytic neoplasms, particularly those with borderline morphologic features, remains a challenging area in dermatopathology. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) and PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) are recent immunohistochemical markers which have been shown to be valuable in distinguishing benign from malignant melanocytic neoplasms. A retrospective cohort of 144 benign, borderline (Spitz nevi, atypical Spitz tumors and dysplastic nevi) and malignant melanocytic tumors at our institution were analyzed for 5-hmC and PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry. Compared to benign nevi, melanoma cases had higher PRAME expression (p < 0.0001) and lower 5-hmC (p < 0.0001) expression. In receiver operator curve analysis, 5-hmC and PRAME were good discriminators between benign and malignant neoplasms; the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.91 for 5-hmC (p < 0.0001) and 0.94 for PRAME (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that 5-hmC expression was significantly different between dysplastic nevi and melanoma. The combination of PRAME and 5-hmC significantly improved the predictive ability of these markers (AUC 0.97, p < 0.001). Having both PRAME expression of 4 + (> 75 % lesional cells positive) and 5-hmC of < 0.2 was highly specific for malignancy (98 %) with a sensitivity of 61 %. Utilizing 5-hmC and PRAME in conjunction improves their diagnostic value in distinguishing benign from malignant melanocytic neoplasms.

PRAME Immunostaining in BAP-1-Inactivated Melanocytic Tumors: Unraveling Diagnostic Complexity and Exploring Germline Mutation Associations

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous melanocytic tumors with BAP-1 inactivation (BIMTs), linked to mutations in the BAP-1 gene, present diagnostic challenges due to their morphological similarities with other melanocytic lesions. The search for reliable diagnostic markers, including PRAME, holds potential to significantly improve the accuracy of differential diagnoses.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 32 BIMTs from 25 patients, collected between 2018 and 2022, involved histologic examination and immunostaining for BAP-1 and PRAME.

RESULTS

Positive PRAME expression, defined as diffuse staining in at least 75% of nevic cells, was observed in 19% of cases. Variations in PRAME expression patterns were noted, particularly in biphasic lesions and those associated with germline BAP-1 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic complexities of BIMTs necessitate a comprehensive diagnostic strategy. While BAP-1 immunostaining remains pivotal, this study explored PRAME as a potential adjunctive diagnostic tool. PRAME antibody shows highly variable expression in BIMTs, limiting its utility as a supportive tool for the differential diagnosis with melanomas, especially in patients with biphasic lesions and germline mutations in BAP-1.

A Comparative Study Between Copy Number Alterations and PRAME Immunohistochemical Pilot Study in Challenging Melanocytic Lesions

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic uncertainty for ambiguous lesions that fall on the spectrum between nevi and melanoma remains a significant challenge and can have consequences for patient management.

METHODS

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic utility of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry to molecular testing (FISH and SNP array) in 34 diagnostically challenging melanocytic lesions and 9 non-diagnostically challenging melanomas.

RESULTS

We conclude that while PRAME immunohistochemistry demonstrates high specificity (96.2%) in diagnostically challenging melanocytic lesions, its low sensitivity (12.5%) suggests that it should not replace histopathological evaluation in rendering the final diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that PRAME may serve as a useful adjunct in the diagnostic workup, particularly due to its high negative predictive value, but should be used in conjunction with other established diagnostic modalities.

Childhood and adolescent melanoma: An update

Pediatric melanoma is a rare but clinically significant public health concern, as it accounts for 7% of all malignancies in adolescents aged 15 to 19. Given the overall rarity of pediatric melanoma, especially in preadolescents, patients can go undetected, leading to a delay in treatment. We divide pediatric melanoma subtypes into three distinct age ranges-infantile, preadolescent, and adolescent-and distinguish the clinical features, prognosis, and associated risk factors of each age range. We next summarize the three predominant melanoma subtypes-Spitzoid melanoma, congenital melanocytic nevus-associated melanoma, and conventional (adult-type) melanoma-and provide distinguishing clinical, histologic, and genetic features from their difficult-to-differentiate benign counterparts. We conclude by reviewing consensus guidelines for pediatric melanoma staging and treatment, with a special emphasis on outlining barriers to adapting the advancements in targeted therapeutics into the standard care of pediatric melanoma.

PRAME and Historical Immunohistochemical Antibodies Ki-67, P16, and HMB-45 in Ambiguous Melanocytic Tumors

ABSTRACT

Ambiguous melanocytic lesions/tumors (AMLs) can be simply described as melanocytic neoplasms that cannot be differentiated as either a melanoma or a nevus. Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is a novel antibody that can help differentiate between nevi and melanomas. However, its usefulness remains controversial in AMLs. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the importance of PRAME and diagnostic auxiliary antibodies (Ki-67, p16, HMB-45) in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions, especially in AMLs. This study included 52 ambiguous melanocytic lesions, 40 nevi, and 40 melanomas. All immunohistochemical studies were performed automatically using the Universal Alkaline Phosphatase Red Detection Kit. Different analytic approaches were used for each antibody based on the literature. Statistically, the multinomial forward stepwise elimination logistic regression analysis was used to create a statistical model to predict the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions based on clinical, morphological, and immunohistochemical data. PRAME positivity was very strong and diffuse in the melanoma group and statistically significantly higher than that of the AML and nevus groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the nevus and AML groups. The Ki-67 proliferation index and HMB-45 staining pattern provided valuable indications for distinguishing between these 3 groups. The P16 antibody was limited in supporting the differential diagnosis. Our statistical model showed that a high mitosis count, central pagetoid spread, and PRAME positivity increased the probability of melanoma against an AML diagnosis. This study showed the advantages of evaluating the PRAME antibody together with morphological features and other immunohistochemical markers (Ki-67 and HMB-45) in the differential diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.

PRAME Immunohistochemistry in Thin Melanomas Compared to Melanocytic Nevi

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma) immunohistochemistry has proven helpful in distinguishing malignant from benign melanocytic tumors. We studied PRAME IHC expression in 46 thin melanomas and 39 melanocytic nevi, mostly dysplastic nevi. Twenty-six percent (26.09%) of the melanomas showed diffuse PRAME staining in over 76% of the tumor cells (4+), and 34.78% of the melanomas showed PRAME expression in over 51% of the tumor cells (3+ or 4+), while 8% were entirely negative for PRAME. No melanocytic nevi were PRAME 4+ or 3+. More than half of the nevi (64%) were entirely negative for PRAME staining, and 36% of the nevi showed staining expression in 1-25% (1+) or 26-50% of the cells (2+). No nevi were stained with a color intensity of 3, while 16.67% of the melanomas were stained with this color intensity. Most nevi (78.57%) were stained with an intensity of 1. With a lower positivity threshold, sensitivity increases with still reasonable specificity. The best accuracy was obtained for the 2+ positivity threshold. In conclusion, PRAME staining helps distinguish thin melanomas from dysplastic nevi. However, the threshold of positivity should be lowered in order not to miss thin melanomas.

Melanoma in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Melanoma in younger individuals has different clinical presentations, histologic characteristics and prognosis from older patients. This review summarizes key differences and important new insights into pediatric and young adult melanoma, as well as recent evolutions in treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular techniques have improved the classification of melanocytic neoplasms, and are especially useful in the workup of the diagnostically challenging lesions frequent in this age group. Molecular evaluation highlights differences between melanoma and atypical lesions with Spitz-like morphology, and should routinely be incorporated for diagnosing and classifying Spitzoid melanocytic to guide prognostication and treatment. Once diagnosed, the management of bona fide melanoma in children and young adults is largely similar to older patients, while the optimal management of lesions such as atypical Spitz tumors remains uncertain. Increased awareness of the presentation and diagnostic characteristics of melanoma in young individuals will allow earlier detection, and improved diagnostic techniques will allow optimum management without over- or under-treatment.

PRAME Updated: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Role in Skin Cancer

Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME), a member of the cancer/testis antigen family, is central to the field of skin cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. As a nuclear receptor and transcriptional regulator, PRAME plays a critical role in inhibiting retinoic acid signalling, which is essential for cell differentiation and proliferation. Its aberrant overexpression in various malignancies, particularly cutaneous melanoma, is associated with more aggressive tumour phenotypes, positioning PRAME as both a diagnostic and prognostic marker. In melanoma, PRAME is typically highly expressed, in contrast to its weak or absent expression in benign nevi, thereby improving the accuracy of differential diagnoses. The diagnostic value of PRAME extends to various lesions. It is significantly expressed in uveal melanoma, correlating to an increased risk of metastasis. In acral melanomas, especially those with histopathological ambiguity, PRAME helps to improve diagnostic accuracy. However, its expression in spitzoid and ungual melanocytic lesions is inconsistent and requires a comprehensive approach for an accurate assessment. In soft tissue sarcomas, PRAME may be particularly helpful in differentiating melanoma from clear cell sarcoma, an important distinction due to their similar histological appearance but different treatment approaches and prognosis, or in detecting dedifferentiated and undifferentiated melanomas. In non-melanoma skin cancers such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma, the variable expression of PRAME can lead to diagnostic complexity. Despite these challenges, the potential of PRAME as a therapeutic target in melanoma is significant. Emerging immunotherapies, including T-cell-based therapies and vaccines targeting PRAME, are being investigated to exploit its cancer-specific expression. Ongoing research into the molecular role and mechanism of action of PRAME in skin cancer continues to open new avenues in both diagnostics and therapeutics, with the potential to transform the management of melanoma and related skin cancers.

PRAME Is an Effective Tool for the Diagnosis of Nevus-Associated Cutaneous Melanoma

(1) Background: Nevus-associated cutaneous melanoma (CM) is relatively common in the clinical practice of dermatopathologists. The correct diagnosis and staging of nevus-associated cutaneous melanoma (CM) mainly relies on the correct discrimination between benign and malignant cells. Recently, PRAME has emerged as a promising immunohistochemical marker of malignant melanocytes. (2) Methods: PRAME immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in 69 cases of nevus-associated CMs. Its expression was evaluated using a score ranging from 0 to 4+ based on the percentage of melanocytic cells with a nuclear expression. PRAME IHC sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were assessed. Furthermore, the agreement between morphological data and PRAME expression was evaluated for the diagnosis of melanoma components and nevus components. (3) Results: PRAME IHC showed a sensitivity of 59%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 71%. The diagnostic agreement between morphology and PRAME IHC was fair (Cohen's Kappa: 0.3); the diagnostic agreement regarding the benign nevus components associated with CM was perfect (Cohen's Kappa: 1.0). PRAME was significantly more expressed in thick invasive CMs than in thin cases (p = 0.02). (4) Conclusions: PRAME IHC should be considered for the diagnostic evaluation of nevus-associated CM and is most useful in cases of thick melanomas. Pathologists should carefully consider that a PRAME-positive cellular population within the context of a nevus could indicate a CM associated with the nevus. A negative result does not rule out this possibility.

Expression of Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma, a Cancer/Testis Antigen, in Carcinoma In Situ of the Urinary Tract

Carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the urinary tract comprises 1-3% of all urothelial malignancies and is often a precursor to muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aimed to examine the expression profiles of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), a cancer/testis antigen, and assess its diagnostic and therapeutic applications in CIS, given that its expression in UC has been minimally studied and has not yet been analyzed in CIS. We selected consecutive patients with CIS who underwent biopsy and/or transurethral tumor resection at the Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital. Immunohistochemical staining for PRAME and p53 was performed. Overall, 53 patients with CIS (6 females and 47 males) were included. Notably, PRAME expression was observed in 23 of the 53 patients (43.4%), whereas it was absent in the non-neoplastic urothelial epithelium. Furthermore, no correlation was found between PRAME expression and aberrant p53 expression. Therefore, PRAME expression may serve as a useful marker for CIS of the urinary tract. Furthermore, PRAME may be a candidate for the novel therapeutic target for standard treatment-refractory CIS patients.

Immunohistochemistry for PRAME in Dermatopathology

ABSTRACT

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is a tumor-associated antigen first identified in a melanoma patient and found to be expressed in most melanomas as well as in variable levels in other malignant neoplasms of epithelial, mesenchymal, or hematolymphoid lineage. Detection of PRAME expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue is possible by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with commercially available monoclonal antibodies. In situ and invasive melanoma frequently show a diffuse pattern of nuclear PRAME immunoreactivity which contrasts with the infrequent and typically nondiffuse staining seen in nevi. In many challenging melanocytic tumors, results of PRAME IHC and other ancillary tests correlate well, but not always: The tests are not interchangeable. Most metastatic melanomas are positive for PRAME, whereas nodal nevi are not. Numerous studies on PRAME IHC have become available in the past few years with results supporting the value of PRAME IHC as an ancillary tool in the evaluation of melanocytic lesions and providing insights into limitations in sensitivity and specificity as well as possible pitfalls that need to be kept in mind by practicing pathologists.

PRAME immunohistochemistry compared to traditional FISH testing in spitzoid neoplasms and other difficult to diagnose melanocytic neoplasms

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma) is a gene first identified in melanoma. It has been proposed as a useful marker to differentiate melanoma from benign melanocytic neoplasms. Recently genomic testing using fluorescence in situ hybridization has been used to aid in the diagnosis of difficult melanocytic neoplasms. We have compared PRAME staining to FISH testing results in 83 difficult to classify melanocytic neoplasms which showed spitzoid histologic features. A relatively low sensitivity of 29.6% and high specificity of 76.8% is seen with PRAME staining as compared to genomic testing with fluorescence in situ hybridization. This study highlights the limitations of PRAME staining in spitzoid neoplasms.

Ancillary testing for melanoma: current trends and practical considerations

The diagnosis of melanocytic lesions is aided by ancillary testing, but clinical inspection with the histomorphological assessment on biopsy remains sufficient in most cases. Immunohistochemistry and molecular studies have proven useful for diminishing the pool of histomorphologically borderline lesions, and sequential testing may further improve overall diagnostic performance, but these assays should be used in a stepwise fashion if at all. Ancillary tests vary based on their technology, performance, and practical considerations, including but not limited to the specific diagnostic question, cost, and turn-around time, which impact test selection. This review examines currently used ancillary tests for the purpose of characterizing melanocytic lesions. Both scientific and practical considerations are discussed.

Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of PRAME in distinguishing primary cutaneous melanomas from benign melanocytic lesions

PRAME is a novel immunohistochemical marker that aids the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. Diffuse PRAME positivity suggests melanoma, whereas benign naevi are negative or only weakly positive. However, the factual diagnostic accuracy of PRAME is not well established. Moreover, some studies have suggested that the threshold of 3+/50% positive cells may be more useful in practice than the most widely used cut-off (4+/75% of positive cells). Hence, we performed a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and optimal threshold for PRAME in distinguishing benign melanocytic proliferations from melanomas. Twenty-six studies were enrolled into the meta-analysis. A total of 2915 melanocytic lesions were analysed. The optimal threshold for PRAME positivity was estimated at 3.11, which translates into 3+ in practice. Sensitivity and specificity calculated from SROC at the 3+ threshold were 0.735 (0.631-0.818) and 0.915 (0.834-0.958), respectively, compared to 0.679 (0.559-0.957) and 0.957 (0.908-0.981) at the 4+ cut-off. In subgroup analysis, the spitzoid subgroup was characterised by the lowest sensitivity and diagnostic odds ratio of PRAME. Our findings indicate that PRAME immunohistochemistry may serve as an ancillary marker to support the diagnosis of melanoma. Nevertheless, the accuracy of PRAME may be lower in spitzoid neoplasms. Our meta-analysis suggests that the 3+/50% threshold might be more useful in practice than the 4+/75% cut-off, as it shows higher sensitivity with retained satisfactory specificity.

Combined utility of p16 and BRAF V600E in the evaluation of spitzoid tumors: Superiority to PRAME and correlation with FISH

BACKGROUND

Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms are diagnostically challenging; criteria for malignancy continue to evolve. The ability to predict chromosomal abnormalities with immunohistochemistry (IHC) could help select cases requiring chromosomal evaluation.

METHODS

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-tested spitzoid neoplasms at our institution (2013-2021) were reviewed. p16, BRAF V600E, and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) IHC results were correlated with FISH.

RESULTS

A total of 174 cases (1.9F:1M, median age 28 years; range, 5 months-74 years) were included; final diagnoses: Spitz nevus (11%), atypical Spitz tumor (47%), spitzoid dysplastic nevus (9%), and spitzoid melanoma (32%). Sixty (34%) were FISH positive, most commonly with absolute 6p25 gain (RREB1 > 2). Dermal mitotic count was the only clinicopathologic predictor of FISH. Among IHC-stained cases, p16 was lost in 55 of 134 cases (41%); loss correlated with FISH positive (p < 0.001, Fisher exact test). BRAF V600E (14/88, 16%) and PRAME (15/56, 27%) expression did not correlate with FISH alone (p = 0.242 and p = 0.359, respectively, Fisher exact test). When examined together, however, p16-retained/BRAF V600E-negative lesions had low FISH-positive rates (5/37, 14%; 4/37, 11% not counting isolated MYB loss); all other marker combinations had high rates (56%-75% of cases; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

p16/BRAF V600E IHC predicts FISH results. "Low-risk" lesions (p16⁺ /BRAF V600E^- ) uncommonly have meaningful FISH abnormalities (11%). PRAME may have limited utility in this setting.