1
|
Chakraborty L, Thistlethwaite J, Scott D, Henstra D, Minano A, Rus H. Assessing social vulnerability and identifying spatial hotspots of flood risk to inform socially just flood management policy. RISK ANALYSIS : AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SOCIETY FOR RISK ANALYSIS 2023; 43:1058-1078. [PMID: 35689358 DOI: 10.1111/risa.13978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
This study presents the first nationwide spatial assessment of flood risk to identify social vulnerability and flood exposure hotspots that support policies aimed at protecting high-risk populations and geographical regions of Canada. The study used a national-scale flood hazard dataset (pluvial, fluvial, and coastal) to estimate a 1-in-100-year flood exposure of all residential properties across 5721 census tracts. Residential flood exposure data were spatially integrated with a census-based multidimensional social vulnerability index (SoVI) that included demographic, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic indicators influencing vulnerability. Using Bivariate Local Indicators of Spatial Association (BiLISA) cluster maps, the study identified geographic concentration of flood risk hotspots where high vulnerability coincided with high flood exposure. The results revealed considerable spatial variations in tract-level social vulnerability and flood exposure. Flood risk hotspots belonged to 410 census tracts, 21 census metropolitan areas, and eight provinces comprising about 1.7 million of the total population and 51% of half-a-million residential properties in Canada. Results identify populations and the geographic regions near the core and dense urban areas predominantly occupying those hotspots. Recognizing priority locations is critically important for government interventions and risk mitigation initiatives considering socio-physical aspects of vulnerability to flooding. Findings reinforce a better understanding of geographic flood-disadvantaged neighborhoods across Canada, where interventions are required to target preparedness, response, and recovery resources that foster socially just flood management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Scott
- University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Daniel Henstra
- University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Andrea Minano
- University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Horatiu Rus
- University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barendrecht MH, McCarthy S, Viglione A. A comparative analysis of the relationship between flood experience and private flood mitigation behaviour in the regions of England. JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT 2021; 14:e12700. [PMID: 34899978 PMCID: PMC8641382 DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
There has been a move towards a more integrated approach to flood risk management, which includes a stronger focus on property level measures. However, in England the uptake of these measures remains low. Flood experience has been found to influence preparedness (i.e., the uptake of measures), but even experience does not always result in an increase in preparedness. We investigate the variations in the relationship between experience and preparedness for the regions of England as defined by the Environment Agency. Analysis of survey data collected by the Environment Agency among the at risk population between 1997 and 2004 was undertaken to determine the differences between the seven regions. We find that in the South West, Southern and Anglian regions increases in preparedness with increasing experience are higher compared to other regions. In the Thames, Midlands and North West regions the preparedness increases less with increasing experience. We explore the influence of other factors influencing flood mitigation behaviour that have been previously found in the literature and find that the differences between regions are correlated with the severity of experienced flooding and whether English is the first language of the respondents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Simon McCarthy
- Flood Hazard Research CentreMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK
| | - Alberto Viglione
- Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Longman JM, Bennett-Levy J, Matthews V, Berry HL, Passey ME, Rolfe M, Morgan GG, Braddon M, Bailie R. Rationale and methods for a cross-sectional study of mental health and wellbeing following river flooding in rural Australia, using a community-academic partnership approach. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1255. [PMID: 31510969 PMCID: PMC6739930 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7501-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Climate change is associated with greater frequency, duration, intensity and unpredictability of certain weather-related events, including floods. Floods harm mental health. There is limited understanding of the mental health and well-being effects from river flooding, particularly over the longer term and in rural contexts. This paper describes the rationale, aims, objectives, study design and socio-demographic characteristics of the sample for a study measuring associations between flood experience and mental health and wellbeing of residents (particularly those most likely to be negatively impacted and hard to reach) in rural NSW Australia 6 months following a devastating flood in 2017. To our knowledge, the study is the first of its kind within Australia in a rural community and is an important initiative given the likelihood of an increasing frequency of severe flooding in Australia given climate change. METHODS A conceptual framework (The Flood Impact Framework) drawing on social ecological approaches was developed by the research team. It was based on the literature and feedback from the community. The Framework describes putative relationships between flood exposure and mental health and wellbeing outcomes. Within a community-academic partnership approach, a cross-sectional survey was then undertaken to quantify and further explore these relationships. RESULTS The cross-sectional survey was conducted online (including on mobile phone) and on paper between September and November 2017 and recruited 2530 respondents. Of those, 2180 provided complete demographic data, among whom 69% were women, 91% were aged 25-74, 4% identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander, 9% were farmers and 33% were business owners. CONCLUSIONS The study recruited a wide range of respondents and the partnership facilitated the community's engagement with the design and implementation of the study. The study will provide a basis for a follow-up study, that will aim to improve the understanding of mental health and wellbeing effects over the longer term. It will provide an important and original contribution to understanding river flooding and mental health in rural Australia, a topic that will grow in importance in the context of human-induced climate change, and identify critical opportunities to strengthen services, emergency planning and resilience to future flooding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Longman
- The University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia.
| | - J Bennett-Levy
- The University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia
| | - V Matthews
- The University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia
| | - H L Berry
- Sydney School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - M E Passey
- The University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia
| | - M Rolfe
- The University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia
| | - G G Morgan
- The University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia
| | - M Braddon
- The University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia
| | - R Bailie
- The University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ibrahim SS, Ozdeser H, Cavusoglu B. Vulnerability to recurrent shocks and disparities in gendered livelihood diversification in remote areas of Nigeria. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2019; 26:2939-2949. [PMID: 30499093 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3854-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
New multidimensional indicators of vulnerability to disaster from external shocks were constructed using survey data covering 1750 respondents from rural Nigeria. Simple ordinary least squares and decomposition analysis were then used to examine the effect of recurrent shocks on livelihood diversification. The results elicited several findings. Although findings from the constructed vulnerability indices revealed overall high risks of disasters, females were disproportionally more vulnerable to cattle rustling. Conversely, both natural hazard-induced and cattle rustling-driven shocks have a strong negative impact on livelihood diversification. This effect is invariant regardless of the perceived gender of the respondents. Decomposition results show that recurrent shocks have moderate influences on inter-gender income disparities, as a larger proportion of the inequalities are explained by demographic characteristics. The findings point to a number of policy recommendations, most notably that the disaster prevention and management strategies should prioritise interventions that have a direct bearing on an individual's economic, human, and social capitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saifullahi Sani Ibrahim
- Department of Economics, Near East University, Near East Boulevard Via Mersin 10 Turkey, 99138, Nicosia/TRNC, Cyprus.
- Department of Economics and Development Studies, Federal University Dutsin-ma, Dutsin-ma, Katsina State, Nigeria.
| | - Huseyin Ozdeser
- Department of Economics, Near East University, Near East Boulevard Via Mersin 10 Turkey, 99138, Nicosia/TRNC, Cyprus
| | - Behiye Cavusoglu
- Department of Economics, Near East University, Near East Boulevard Via Mersin 10 Turkey, 99138, Nicosia/TRNC, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Assessing the Capacity to Govern Flood Risk in Cities and the Role of Contextual Factors. SUSTAINABILITY 2018. [DOI: 10.3390/su10082869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Sea level rise and increased storm events urge cities to develop governance capacity. However, a cohesive conceptual and empirical-based understanding of what governance capacity implies, how to measure it, and what cities can learn, is largely lacking. Understanding the influence of context is critical to address this issue. Accordingly, we aim to identify crosscutting contextual factors and how they prioritise different elements of governance capacity to address urban flood risk. In doing so, a framework of nine conditions and 27 indicators is applied in two Dutch cities and two cities in the United Kingdom. Three crosscutting contextual factors are identified that may explain differences in capacity-development priorities: (1) flood probability and impact; (2) national imposed institutional setting; and, (3) level of authority to secure long-term financial support. Capacity-priorities include, the recent political devolution in the UK, which emphasizes the role of citizen awareness, stakeholder engagement, entrepreneurial agents, and the overall necessity for local capacity-development. The Dutch focus on flood safety through centralised public coordination reduces flood probability but inhibits incentives to reduce flood impacts and lowers public awareness. In conclusion, the three identified contextual factors enable a better understanding of capacity-building priorities and may facilitate learning between cities.
Collapse
|